* Countries of which Yugoslavia consisted

+Skyler TV Yugoslavs were first trollers confirmed. XD

Mihajlo Stojanovic Yes xD

lol hahahha balkanci

hahahahahahahajahahhahahaha

nie umiem ustawić nicku most likely the 1 million of us in the uk

Ale Polaków... XD

*222

Добрый человек + theyre 7 jury is 229

@@user-qw3uh8vr8c 222+ 7

anavi nasruk wtf you on about

+brittany watts lmao

xD

That was so funny :D

+Der fliegende Holländer Best joke ever.

And winner Turkey :)

it's a prank

it doesn't have to be forever... esc voting changes all the time like with juries and stuff. if after may everybody thinks this way of voting sucks they might change it again :D

+jr I think this voting is amazing, but it would be better if the televoting would be given 1-7 , 8, 10 and 12 points, and the jury vote just overall. So, if they switch, it can be better than the old one

+ESC Albania i agree

***** pffff....since when do you watch esc?! Last year ?!?! Omg such a pathetic bitch...

+Italy In Eurovision Just the announcment changes

@@Bayar-oe7rj he's belarussian lol

@Jan Neisius the invisible commenter

Well, it´s just normal in Nordic countries, Finland being the most extreme example. And yes, I´m from Finland. :)

That's Not 504 because Norway can't vote for Norway so it's 492...

@@Bayar-oe7rj 12 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

The highest when relevant to the highest possible and those that were attained was Brotherhood of Man 1976, averaging 9.65 points per country. Nicole for Germany 1981 was 2nd with 9.47 (I love stats, lol)

He recieved 387 points

HAHAHAYA ya! 😂

XD

+anna janus .i. points for Poland

Amir Afendin Poland had from jury 7 points and then BOOM 222 points from the televote

what is memorable about it? just arrogance.

Ruud22nl Jansen looks like someone doesn’t have a sense of humour...

That was just a lame joke

Same With sweden

Yes

my fav from last year

But Portugals song 2017 was horrible... So bad! Even me would have been better (I suck at singing).

@@RealKingston1 Portugal's winning song was the only real song that won Eurovision for a long time. Away with special effects and show, it is a SONG contest. Luckily Netherlands follows Portugal's excellence with a song that also is about voice, music and lyrics!

@@ruud22nljansen88 Then the following year, a Pop song with chicken sounds won, Oh the Irony XD

Under the 2009 system, Portugal 2017 would've received 417 points. That overtakes Anne-Marie David's record of points share (84.7% vs. 81%), and would have received 12 points from a record 20 countries each.

@@toot-tootmcbumersnazzle7604 ..and then promptly succeeded by the more music-inclined number of the Netherlands after.

+Didrik Gustafsson it actually wont why are we wasting 50 mins for the jury votes seems like a waste of time imho they should switch them both around

brittany watts nah i would say its slowly building up the tension, the other part probably wont take more then 10 minutes, no i think will be good, at least worth trying, in worst case they may change it to upcoming years

Didrik Gustafsson true but next year if they keep the system i hope they switch the voting around

brittany watts haha yea, well lets just see how it goes, maybe people change their minds once the show is aired

+Didrik Gustafsson lets see

+Sander X no it;s not

i heard anti social media so denmark last year...

+Sander X No, it Anti Social Media - The Way You Are, from last year's contest

from 3:00 it's Goodbye to yesterday. My last year's favorite ♡

+Sander X first is Denmark's 2015...

?

+fabb4i2 Or in 1990 as the Italian Jury said : "voici le résultat du jury espagnol". And last year when the lines to 3 Countrys broke down.

***** Yes exactly. xDD It's even kind of a classical imo.

fabb4i2 good night United Kingdom

Nemon Cubez 😂😂

Ornochestror Interesting but that happened in 1988 and it was definitely an even bigger thriller. It was even closer. You see almost *all* countries (all but two) had awarded the United Kingdom some points. Many of them 10 and 12 points. Celine Dion of Switzerland was *behind* the United Kingdom by 5 points *not* the same points like was the case in 1998. Then the final votes came in from Yugoslavia. She was trailing the United Kingdom. Yugoslavia then only awarded Switzerland (Celine Dion) 6 points which barely put her in the lead with a single point when 7, 8, 10 and 12 points still could be given... Since the United Kingdom just needed 2 points to overtake Celine Dion chances seemed high they would either get 7, 8, 10 or 12 points and win. As it were Yugoslavia awarded 7 points to the Netherlands, 8 points to Germany, 10 points to Norway...and then a complete shocker - they gave 12 points to France. France was in the lower midfield and nobody had given France any high points. Yugoslavia giving France their 12 points was totally unexpected but it meant Celine Dion had won by the smallest possible margin. Yugoslavia only placed Switzerland 5th and gave higher points to France, Norway, Germany and The Netherlands. So it seemed as if Celine Dion's 1 point lead was a final tiny bit of brief glory. I checked up 1998. The country Macedonia gave 10 points to wasn't Ireland it was the United Kingdom and it wasn't a shocker since it was one of the favorites that evening and had already received four 12 points and placed 2nd overall. Also Macedonia gave Croatia 12 points (not very surprising) and Croatia was doing well that evening and had two 12 points and four ten points votes. It ended the contest in a strong 5th place. So let's summarize: In 1998: They headed into the final vote with equal points. In 1988: Celine Dion was behind and trailing the United Kingdom by 5 points. In 1998: Macedonia still placed Israel top 3. In 1988: Yugoslavia placed Switzerland (Dion) 5th. In 1998: Macedonia gave United Kingdom their 10 points, a popular song which ended the contest in 2nd place and 12 points to Croatia which in a strong 5th place (already had six 10/12 points votes). In 1988: Yugoslavia gave the Netherlands 7 points (a song that finished 9th that evening), 8th to Germany (finished 11th overall) , Norway 10 points (finished 5th but only had a single 10 point vote by said Yugoslavia) and France (!) 12 points (which catapulted France to 10th overall in the final standings). Nobody expected France to get 12 points from Yugoslavia. But this meant that their 6 points had given Celine Dion the lead by a single point at the finish line. As such Yugoslavia's "We sort of like Switzerland's song but don't like United Kingdom's song at all" won Switzerland the contest by a single point after having been behind by 5 points.

+Marcus Larinen I like this system, but I will miss seeing how the public in each country voted. It's not the same thing checking the lists online after the competition is done and over.

+Marcus Larinen No one asked Swedes to hijacked Eurovison and change rules because they think they are big shots.They are ruining Eurovision cause Eurovision is not Melodiefest( all whatever is called)

TheNellic07 1. The Swedes introduced the current voting system in 2000 after they had won. People probably whined back then aswell but now they are defending the system. 2. ESC needs to evolve and change things up or it'll die off.

Mycenaea This is Eurovision, not Nordicvision.Swedes have their Melodiefest,and they can change everything they want on Melodifest, Eurovision is not their property and no one likes Swedes because of all things, you are ruining ESC!.Last year, winner would be Italy based on televotes, and winner was Sweden because of juries( so, they do all this things cause it is good to them).I don't know why Great Britain, Italy, Germany, France,Spain allows these kind of things!I wanna hear every vote from every country,not to hear boring juries and results from televotes only for 10 the best countries.Swedes- eat dicks!

TheNellic07 hahah! Your Swedish complex is reeeeking!

it was always the same power ... if you take in account the years with televoting of course

+jr This way, the televoting will be more equal to the jury voting. We will not be scammed anymore

+ESC Albania i don't understand how really...

+Baton People complain just to complain without understanding the context of the change. :P

+Malte Schulz Absolutely not. I don't see what people are complaining about. Yes, the previous system was good and we've gotten used to it, but everything needs to change at some point.

Should what back?

@@e.o.9094 periodt

Thunder Cat You sound like a very educated supplier of facts and arguments...

There is not any dictator in Turkey. Turkey is a demokratical republic. Every one has to feel respect Turkish people's choices in elections. Turkey does not participate the esc anymore because the voting system is not trustable with national juries.

We cant get rid of him because he cheats on elections

meanwhile 2021, four losers

@@ThePiro246 I'm SoRrY, 0 PoInTs

LoL 😂 That's right

SertaBBB

+LaVoixCZ What do you mean? And no, she didn't deserve to win more than anyone else. That was then, now is now. Rules and time changes.

+Mycenaea She was better anyway, much bigger personality, probably even the most timeless song ever at the ESC. Everyone knows it! :)

+LaVoixCZ That victory could have changed the Schlager hegemony in succesive years.

+LaVoixCZ in 1992 it was irrelevant how many countries voted for a song, but today this is the first rule to look at in case of a draw

+brittany watts new voting? why would it be beaten?

+gummybears50 Because now, Jury-Voting and Public-Voting are not combined anymore. So every Country gives two times the Classic Points from 1-8 and 10 and 12. But only the Jury-Votes will be announced by a spokesperson. The Public-Voting result will be anncouned, starting with the Country with the fewest Points.

why would they do that? so bizarre! also public voting is more important for us as public ourselves. But I dont understand.. if it's not combined, which one is the considered one?

gummybears50 its double the points if he doesnt get beaten then the person who won did a pretty bad job

oh noooo, I want Rybak to be the one with the record :( :(

+Şule Güleryüz Why ruined? Now you can't say anymore that the Jury Votes ruined everything. Or in the other way, that the public voting destroyed it. (but nobody said that ever). I would love to see Turkey back in the Contest. And Liechtenstein should debut. They have enough Money, so why don't they go to the EBU become a member of them? Why Liechtenstein, Why?

+Schinni Nobody The televoting ruined Malta 2015 and Albania 2012. 😢😢😢

ESC Albania 5th for Albania in 2012 is a verry good result and Malta wasn't that good in my opinion.

+Schinni Nobody Well, it could be 1st in SemiFinal and 3rd in Final, but Rona did amazing as a 5th too. And Malta was 4th for the jury. Amber was AMAZINGLY good.

ESC Albania Amber was in my opinion not that fantastic. Warrior was good, but not amazing.

+A n a k i n ' s E d i t s But Alexander Rybak's points are already up to 3 times as many points as some of the winners from the 80's and 90's. Those winners would only rank like 6th-8th compared to the points that entries nowadays get.

Actually, its gonna be more interesting

+ESC Albania true

+ESC Albania if this system was used last year it would have been obvious Sweden was going to win before the timedevotes were announced. Same as 2012 and even so now you'll know that one of the top 3 countries in the jury vote will win.

No the winner will not have 200 more points than 2nd place. You clearly haven't got how it works!

Sabmis I fully understand how it works. Since the points are effectively doubled a country that would normally win by 100 points e.g. 2012 this gap would be doubled. I just think the new system wasn't needed and it feels like the televotes aren't important.

Effective Media Yeah!

Yeah I love that song

+Ugur chicken

LEONIDAS very funny :) try harder next time

NeverGreen35 son of mongols

***** please try harder next time. I'm pretty sure you have the capacity

***** thats my cock

ArsenijeviĆ.

+Flazh Why should they include it? It's not like it was the first time it ever happened.