❤️❤️

How was he a beast when nothing became of him and everything became of Roger? You're confusing Rafter's skills with Federer's inexperience.

@@lilyleon1475 Heyy I'm new to tennis, could you please explain how the game was slowed down?

@@lilyleon1475 Ironically both of these commentators are still doing this lol! It’s Annabelle Croft and Chris something.

Djokovic is better Fedboy.

@@draakje15 but Federer is no doubt the greatest name in tennis among all the greats…even they think it

@@draakje15 Lmfao - why are you Djokovic fans so awful to others with differing views? I've never seen a Federer fan insult anyone else for their beliefs.

@@Ben6164 i think the worst are Rafa fans %90 are childish.. simply cry babies ..... the proof is : " ohhhhh Rafa lost 😮😮😮 .. no no no he lost because he suffers from multiple chronic injuries otherwise he would never lose " What an old rusty Cliche

@@diosrelish6924 Yeah, that is ridiculous. But I don't understand it. I will always love Federer the most, but all three are fantastic players. I don't understand why Nadal and Djokovic fans need to be so toxic toward those who support Federer. We all love tennis, right? That's something we can agree on? Well, Federer has done so much to promote this sport, it's almost unimaginable - can Nadal and Djokovic fanatics not appreciate that?

You were wrong, he is not even Top 50!

He has 20 grand slams. What are you talking about.

He still does 23 year later

@@asud2571 lol top 3 any way you cut it.

He better stops trying. This is obviously not working out.

@@wouternieminen844 he has 20 grand slams.

@@rebelsrweird4294 I am not sure. But did you sense the joking in this thread?

not really

and then goat gets gobbled by joker

@@abeguy7981 lol okay.... Novax is top 10 at best. No chance at GOAT

@@mikerzisu9508 Haha guy with 21 slams isn't goat but frauderer with 20 is goat ?? Fed fleas don't even know basic arithmetic

@@abeguy7981 a lot more to being the GOAT than some numbers on paper. Novax is an asshole first of all.... absolutely no denying that. His game is boring... baseline hero. Net game is average at best. Serve below average. There is no way he is in the GOAT conversation. Truth hurts Djoker scrub.

@@abeguy7981 Yes because Novax claimed most of his titles in post 2014 era when Federer was 34+ and against the bulllshit young generations. Barring 2011 ..... Djokovic won 3 GS combined in 2012,13,14 and that was his prime. Then he vultured 2015 onwards because Rafa was very bad and Grandpa Federer was his main rival. Djoker never faced a good young generation player. Federer faced great young generation. Djokovic always faced older equivalents on whom he had age and fitness advantage.

With his backwards cap, and his forehand stroke, it reminded me of Leighton Hewitt.

Not available anywhere unfortunately

Yes, now they hug.

@@molybdaenmornell123hopp5 and thats a bad thing for some reason?

They still do.

They still do of course, not sure what that comment was about. But Rafter was known as one of the classiest players at the net after the match, win or lose.

Thank you! ❤️ No idea who she is sorry.

He won junior Wimbledon and the commentator for this very match predicted Federer as a top ten player...

Actually quite the opposite. He was always regarded as a supreme talent but people weren't sure if he had the head to be a great player. Sure proved them wrong

Exactly what can saying the title is extremely hyperbolic

rafter was 26 here...not a veteran player..

@@vladraduandrei5227 you tell me: 26 yr versus 17 yr = veteran vs. junior

Right? Reminds me of (I think) Oscar Wilde: "if you can fake sincerity, you've got it made" or whatever the actual quote is. Pleasant arrogance is hard to pull off.

you mean the back swing?

@@nero1375 kinda the same thing

Dude. The fact he shot up so quick to become unbeatable was cos of his natural talent. Natural talent doesn't mean he never loses. Rafter became #1 player in the world for a while, he wasn't easy to beat.

Fed is incredibly overrated

@@lodensharp2012 Yes over rated. That is why he was 1 point away from defeating 5 years younger Nadal and Djokovic back to back in wimbledon 2019 at almost 38 years of age. It proves that both Nadal and Djokovic was even more overrated since their main rival was a generation older player.

​@@lodensharp2012Not in my opinion.

Yes, thats a good análisis idk what you expect, how they would imagine the career of this 17old apart from (he has some good shots, he could be a great player in the future), when they have seen tons of talented youngsters not living up the hype, you want them to say "this guy Will obviously one of the goats of this sports and Will be gaining gs ay 37" its just bs

It's never gone my friend, I mix between it and the old one when the video is not solely about Rafa!

right, sawing Rod Laver playing comparing to Alcaraz, Rocket looks nothing special. Pretty smart comparison over generations of tennis, equipment and play style. You even see tennis matches? Or just comment dump assumptions ?

@@nero1375 ah shut up man, stop being butthurt. I like Roger too. Nadal is pretty much of the same generation and even a 17 year old Nadal was a physical specimen compared to Fed of same age. Blind fan boy.

@@nero1375 The same with old farts saying "now theres no talent, only hard hitting and grinding, this its not tennis" bs?

@@diegosotomiranda4107 this , so much this. I ve just turned 27 and am so tired of old fuckers on forums talking about how good tennis was back in the day, when to me from every highlights I ve seen from back then it looks much inferior to nowdays.

​@@vladraduandrei5227You will have to learn how to express your views without insulting people .

Oh stop it!

Loden ...... Bullshit. Djokovic beat a worse Nadal in 2015 and 2021 who was injured. 30 yr old Federer defeated peak Djokovic in 2011 in his best season. Djokovic only vultured old Federer (30+ Federer).

He won a set from a 2 time grand slam champion, in his first ever Grand Slam appearance on his least favourite surface!

@@WivoRN that's not a genius feat.

no no, it is not. Is very common youngsters in tennis just break a service and won the very first game on his first appearance over a veteran and Slam Champion. You could totally do it, right?

@@nero1375 you don't get it either. That is remarkable but not GENIUS(!!!). If this was genius what was Michael Chang at 17 beating in semifinal at RG Ivan Lendl(gazillion times GS winner) and then winning RG? Also, when Boris Becker at 17 won Wimbledon? What were those? The title is an obvious exaggeration and Federer's game in this particular match is nothing special and probably similar feats were done quite some times even by players who did not become Federer. Federer IS a genius but not in this game! Sorry to disappoint but try to be honest to yourselves.

@@zberteoc yep, I understand your point, no problem. But Federer it is what it is, one average or bad game do not serves as argument to diminish him. Yea, Chang has a few games but what? He is a very good player and that is it. I'm saying because you mean more like generalist not in this particular match

Can you love Djoko and not diminish other players?

go and have your meds...

@@DiabolicMagicSquare You should have your meds to you can't accept a differing view point .

@@lodensharp2012 So you admit both of you should have meds? Saying he is overrated is you not accepting views differing to yours.

@@vijayendranvijay457 If you think he's the best more power to you i think he's incredibly overrated, in my view dominated an extremely weak era

This is the most ridiculous paragraph I have ever read in my entire life.

@@Ben6164 I agree someone saying he was already a genius at 17 is ridiculous..Fed had success with top players when they were not at their best..

@@canski5646 OK? His defeat of Sampras was still significant - and something no-one else achieved to that extent even though he wasn't at his best and it was a "weak era".

@@Ben6164 no notable wins or players 2003-2009 very weak era and that reflects in fedsqash easy run once he got some confidence..when djoki/ndal/wawarinka/murray started playing well and winning multiple slams was a strong era

@@canski5646 Nadal was literally apart of that 2003-2009 era? Lol. he was strong in Wimbledon 2007... WImbledon 2008.. All those French Opens, AO 2009.. Federer is 23-3 versus Wawrinka and has never lost to him on any HC, so I don't know what difference he makes against Federer. He actually is 4-1 against Djokovic in the last 5 major meetings, so he impacts nole more than Fed. He also beat Novak at his best in 2011 and 2012 on multiple surfaces and even bagelled him once... also 2009 is not really a weaker year than 2010. Djokovic was actually a better player in 2007-2009 than 2010 lol. If that era is weak, then that means that every slam by others as well are weak too which makes 0 sense. Plus, today is less competitive than some of those years in the so-called "weak era". In the recent wimbledon win from djokovic, he got unseeded Kyrgios in the final and did not face a single top 10 player. By that logic, today is an even weaker era. Nadal once again won multiple slams in those years and Djokovic was already a top player. Also, Wimbledon 2009 was a 5 setter last almost 5 hours.