3. Budget Constraints and Constrained Choice

  Переглядів 349,076

MIT OpenCourseWare

MIT OpenCourseWare

3 роки тому

MIT 14.01 Principles of Microeconomics, Fall 2018
Instructor: Prof. Jonathan Gruber
View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/14-01F18
UKposts Playlist: • MIT 14.01 Principles o...
This lecture continues the discussion about consumer choice and what happens when budget constraints are introduced.
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
More courses at ocw.mit.edu
Support OCW at ow.ly/a1If50zVRlQ
We encourage constructive comments and discussion on OCW’s UKposts and other social media channels. Personal attacks, hate speech, trolling, and inappropriate comments are not allowed and may be removed. More details at ocw.mit.edu/comments.

КОМЕНТАРІ: 197
@gilgamarsh
@gilgamarsh Рік тому
Jonathan Gruber is such an incredible instructor, he and MIT should be immensely proud of these lectures.
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze Рік тому
Can u recommend this type of lec for macroeconomics? Pls
@bazingapuzza
@bazingapuzza 7 місяців тому
​@@SakshiSingh-xq1ze there is one on UKposts from another big American school.
@mauriciobemfica
@mauriciobemfica 3 роки тому
Mr. Gruber makes microecon Waaayyyyyyyyy more interesting than my classes in my Masters!!! Thanks MIT!!!!
@NazriB
@NazriB 2 роки тому
Lies again? Bet Clic Acura
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze Рік тому
Can u recommend any macroeconomics lecture series?
@crisronaldo8365
@crisronaldo8365 8 місяців тому
​@@SakshiSingh-xq1ze Principle of macroeconomics by Missouri State University
@suindude8149
@suindude8149 2 місяці тому
Really in case of the previous lectures also so inculcating that generates so many models in my mind solving the crude level industrial problems.
@tarafahey6217
@tarafahey6217 3 роки тому
00:00 Setting Up Budget Constraints 05:25 - - > Marginal Rate of Transformation 07:16 - - > Weight Watchers Example 12:16 Opportunity Set 19:15 Tangency 22:10 The Maths 31:00 Food Stamps Example 38:39 - - > Imposing Preferences 44:13 - - > Effective? (vs money injection)
@THEPBFELIPE
@THEPBFELIPE 2 роки тому
Thank you so much :) Very nice of you!
@abdalla_elhendawy
@abdalla_elhendawy 3 місяці тому
u r a life saver
@yeahwhat6363
@yeahwhat6363 3 роки тому
If I don't have budget constraints I would attend MIT after high school.
@yeahwhat6363
@yeahwhat6363 3 роки тому
@@arrowmouse this ratio seems low, here in India top stem universities (IITs) have 2,000,000 + aspirants and only 10k get in 😂
@actualideas8078
@actualideas8078 3 роки тому
Their faculty vacations on Epstein’s island. I would never give them my money
@hainamtran2232
@hainamtran2232 3 роки тому
@@yeahwhat6363 The quality of the Applicants are not the same lol
@gouravtada
@gouravtada 3 роки тому
@@hainamtran2232 well said
@yusufyakub9068
@yusufyakub9068 3 роки тому
You’re correct
@alita181
@alita181 2 роки тому
Thank you so so much for publishing this. I'm an adult student finishing my degree with an online university and I cannot, for the love of God, understand a single word of the crappy tutorials that my university provides. These videos not only make everything a lot easier to understand but it also makes it so much fun and engaging. Thank you MIT and thank you Professor Gruber.
@dr.cranium9080
@dr.cranium9080 2 роки тому
what uni did you choose?
@nycbankers1427
@nycbankers1427 Рік тому
I told my mom I was attending MIT she was so happy but little does she know my budget constraint only allows me to go to UKposts University
@esosesos9743
@esosesos9743 10 місяців тому
Thanks also to the video editors for showing all the diagrams.
@thequickreviewer7956
@thequickreviewer7956 2 роки тому
Absolutely love the way he explain things with ease and also with great examples with which you can relate.
@sebastianlastname1986
@sebastianlastname1986 Рік тому
This is going hand-in-hand with my online microeconomics class. Thank you so much for posting these lectures, I wish I took this class in person, but this makes up for it!
@debunklies9124
@debunklies9124 3 роки тому
A good idea would be to download the transcript, play the video at 1.75 speed and look at the transcript and the graphs (could been found in the handouts section). If you don't get something you could play the video at lower speed.
@hongyo122
@hongyo122 2 роки тому
Given my buget, 최상의 선택을 하는 것(=further indifferent curve)= tangency 를 구하면 됨, 그 bundle=optimal choice(AC)
@ShyamSunder-se3tq
@ShyamSunder-se3tq 3 роки тому
let's assume that your parents have given you some amount of income, we'll call it "WHY"
@RaylinRecords
@RaylinRecords 3 роки тому
Where are the black and red dots for the opportunity set?
@isabelledesouzaafonso2-a161
@isabelledesouzaafonso2-a161 Місяць тому
im looking for them too
@muchbuild
@muchbuild Рік тому
I am not even economics students yet videos are bingeable it's really good
@hannahurmoneit2218
@hannahurmoneit2218 4 місяці тому
Professor Gruber is single handily saving my economics exam!!
@louisechristiansen3877
@louisechristiansen3877 3 роки тому
Thank you so much for this excellent free education.
@mohdluqman1336
@mohdluqman1336 3 роки тому
Are you on Facebook
@jayangli
@jayangli 2 роки тому
Same. Really like these free lectures from MIT. Thankyou. They don't grant certification on MITopencourseware, but the free learning for anyone that wants to and get education from MIT is just fantastic.
@h.i.sjoevall4213
@h.i.sjoevall4213 2 роки тому
Thank you for publishing these!
@brainstormingsharing1309
@brainstormingsharing1309 3 роки тому
Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍
@lebeccthecomputer6158
@lebeccthecomputer6158 2 роки тому
This guy is an awesome professor
@sauravsatyadarshiray
@sauravsatyadarshiray Рік тому
Bingeing on Prof. Gruber's lectures.
@WorthlessWinner
@WorthlessWinner 3 роки тому
40:00 i was getting really mad at Jon saying he was just doing positive economics when the choice of "shelter" as good B rather than "drugs" has obvious normative implications..... so i'm glad he addresses this, i should've had more faith in him :)
@AsadAliShah89
@AsadAliShah89 3 роки тому
I hadn't budget, so I am attending MIT on youtube after graduation in my private Master degree programme
@zardi9083
@zardi9083 3 роки тому
How to shut a student up: "That is a really good question and we will come back to that later"
@elkyelkyelky
@elkyelkyelky Рік тому
Finished, thanks for sharing
@anshuaditya5665
@anshuaditya5665 Місяць тому
This lectures are so good it's feel it's made by some mit instructor
@Manuel-vz3cu
@Manuel-vz3cu 3 роки тому
Thank you MIT
@shivakumarv301
@shivakumarv301 2 роки тому
Can a person compare more than two variable at a time? Is his focus of attention not limited to two things? What's the point of creating three dimensional plane that represents some models of economics?
@obaadelusi
@obaadelusi 2 роки тому
Thank you for this.
@arielsong1289
@arielsong1289 9 місяців тому
One point I wanna make to the "food/shelter" case, if most people living below the poverty line do prefer shelter, it is better to not give them cash but other life essentials. Because if everybody spend more money on shelter, they would just drive up the low-end housing price. Because they are the target group of that market anyways, so if all of them are capable of/willing to pay more money, the competition'd make price goes up and money goes to the landlords.
@aliasjon8320
@aliasjon8320 2 роки тому
Drafts : 36:00
@gnc9400
@gnc9400 2 роки тому
In lesson 2 professor Gruber mentioned addictive behaviour, like smoking, can change your utility function over time. So I think an idealized perfectly rational agent should take this into account, but in practice doesn't look so simple. In these cases, are economists more amenable to some form of paternalism?
@pickyraccoon
@pickyraccoon 2 роки тому
Look for Richard Thaler and Cass Sustein. They coined the term "libertarian paternalism" and it's well used in behavioral economics as a whole. 😊
@suindude8149
@suindude8149 2 місяці тому
In case of the optimization of life's own temporal value,the most optimistic way in the risk dissoluted scenario of the macroeconomic behaviour,it's really the inverse utility of paternalism if we don't accept the indifference to the smoking habit,the utility of other habits like overeating or any kind of portion that affects the micro temporality creates a long difference in the human behaviour. In that context one indifference of temporality comes in my way of thought as the technical improvement in the world of cheap and sustainable technical imposition to increase the micro utility to support the entire product mix would be a great strategy concentric in case of the product generation.Hence a complete inversion of inverted utility to the actual utility function hence,the same is here the increase in marginal utility by relinquishing the smoking habit would be far more better replacement of everything having high utility function including a saviour in the irrational behaviour to the human being the high penetratiin of sustainability.
@suindude8149
@suindude8149 2 місяці тому
In the post Covid days the budget constratint has its niche to identify the inflationary rate in case of buying the inventory in case of Economic quantity demanded with the revised assumptions. Hence,its most pivotal for the downward slope in the production curve of the industrial phenomenon. Hence,all the subsidirat affecting the quantity demanded will be the hardest portion which needs the utmost discussion often. Thus marginal replacement of goods may be a hugh value in case of diminishing of marginal returns in case of managers.
@minthuta726
@minthuta726 11 місяців тому
These free courses are very useful for students from a third world country like me.
@nahasco
@nahasco 2 роки тому
Where can I watch the math courses guys? The ones he says are on friday...
@nataliabishop5482
@nataliabishop5482 Рік тому
What if I found a place that sold $5 cookies and not $6 so I could buy more for less? How would this effect the equation after the fact? I see how it’d stay if the $5 cookie was the original price but let’s say it’s not..? That or like.. what if there’s a sale?
@yutikasingh5443
@yutikasingh5443 Рік тому
POV: you're searching for the notes.
@rajeshmishra7157
@rajeshmishra7157 4 місяці тому
At 29:05 how is market telling that we can trade a cookie for only half slice of pizza?
@dennis7928
@dennis7928 Рік тому
QUESTION: minute 28.48 > " you're willing to give up 2.5 p for 1 c" is incorrect right? Looking at the graph (minute 29.18) the indifference curve looks like that you're willing to give up 2.5 p for 2 c as the interval on the x axis is not 1 but 2. Can someone either tell me that I am right, but more likely explain why I am wrong?
@7amseel
@7amseel Рік тому
"You're willing to give up 2.5 P for 1 C" is correct. If you look at the graph (29:18) more closely, you will see that at point A, the value at x axis is 2, but also the value of y axis is 5. So basically, you are willing to give up 5 pizzas for 2 cookies which is same us giving up 2.5 pizzas for 1 cookie.
@chhandamachhangte655
@chhandamachhangte655 3 роки тому
Thanks MIT
@ardythe14
@ardythe14 6 місяців тому
Very nice! Also this showed that 4Ps (in the Philippines) is not a good aide to alleviate poverty.
@jamesdhuorchiengkueu3417
@jamesdhuorchiengkueu3417 Місяць тому
I love this lecture. I'm economist who want to learn more.
@arubhardwaj4733
@arubhardwaj4733 3 роки тому
I already passed my UG: why I am watching this? It's an addiction, lol
@anudarib
@anudarib 2 роки тому
Yo I am addicted to isekai mangas and webtoons and been using all my concentration skill to focus on this class Yours is good addiction
@gunha8288
@gunha8288 3 роки тому
27:41 I don't understand the part "du/dp = 0.5xc / root (pxc)" why 0.5? Can any one help me?
@shivanshsubramanian5525
@shivanshsubramanian5525 3 роки тому
dU/dP = d(root(PC))/dP = 0.5*C/root(PC) Its just differentiation
@user-ze1tc1ur9p
@user-ze1tc1ur9p 3 роки тому
@@shivanshsubramanian5525 where's the 0.5 from? and why 0.5*c/root(pc)....thanks..
@davidbarroso8523
@davidbarroso8523 3 роки тому
@@user-ze1tc1ur9p The derivative of a function (ax)^n is a*n*(ax)^(n-1) where a is a constant. The square root of PC is equivalent to saying (PC)^(1/2) or (PC)^0.5, so if you're deriving with respect to P, P is your x, C is a, and 0.5 is n, so the derivative would be C*0.5*(PC)^(0.5-1) or 0.5*C*(PC)^(-0.5). x^-n is equivalent to 1/(x^n), a negative power just means you move it to the denominator, so you get 0.5*C/(PC)^0.5, and again, x^0.5 is the same as square root of x, so finally you're left with 0.5*C/squareroot(PC). If you do it with respect to C, C is your x instead, you get 0.5*P/squareroot(PC). dU/dP means derivative of U w/ respect to P, dU/dC means derivative of U w/ respect to C.
@ahmettayyipaydin6925
@ahmettayyipaydin6925 3 роки тому
@@davidbarroso8523 thank you so much. I was confused but I see now
@Adityakumar-is2ke
@Adityakumar-is2ke 11 місяців тому
@@ahmettayyipaydin6925 thank you so much broo i just wasnt thinking of taking c as constant and your explaination cleared it up
@bhavikaborawat8323
@bhavikaborawat8323 Рік тому
Shouldn't the decrease in budget constraint (imposed by parents) lead the students to opt the cookies more because they are cheaper and hence the slope of curve to change (increase -vely) thus creating a fractional MRT?
@7amseel
@7amseel Рік тому
MRT is the ratio of market prices of two goods. It is independent of your income or budget constraints. The decrease in income will in some combination lower both the amount of cookies and the amount of pizza. However, the exact combination by which pizza slices and cookies get lowered depend upon your utility function which ultimately makes your indifference curve.
@defyingfinance9882
@defyingfinance9882 7 місяців тому
What you described at the end really is the saying, you can’t make a poor man rich. The concept of wisdom over dolllars. Teach a man to fish type of thing. People who get money quick don’t know how to manage it unless they have earned the wisdom prior.
@Charismatic8482
@Charismatic8482 4 місяці тому
This just made life in college a whole lot easier.
@uditabhattacharya2824
@uditabhattacharya2824 4 місяці тому
26:12 watch continue to see food stamps and cash transfer
@pushtysuri6373
@pushtysuri6373 2 роки тому
Can someone explain why A offers more utility on less budget?? I mean-- MUc/MUp > Pc/Pp??
@suindude8149
@suindude8149 2 місяці тому
it might be arising out of the budgetary notion in case of planning or strategizing for the optimal output or utility in sense of personal micro Economics to derive the high value of constrained budget of the whole in case of the value generation of the industrial output.
@sumanchowdhury6162
@sumanchowdhury6162 Рік тому
As someone who came from Architecture to economics, know things different. In architecture it's said - less s more In economics - more s better than less
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze Рік тому
Can u recommend series lecture of intermediate macroeconomics ?
@jat1339
@jat1339 Рік тому
@@SakshiSingh-xq1ze macroeconomics k liye nptel k kaafi ache hai lecture
@vishnukanhan8809
@vishnukanhan8809 Рік тому
Wow if I can ask what made you switch from architecture to economics?
@sahilnegi4326
@sahilnegi4326 День тому
Explaing these concepts without calculus must be difficult for him. And its actually very confusing for the math folks too.
@user-kl7mu7rz1n
@user-kl7mu7rz1n 7 місяців тому
anyone care to help me on 27:59 why MuP=dU/dP has a equation of 0.5xC?? where does the C comes from? I am totally fine with the derivative part, I know where the 0.5 comes from, but C?? why Mu of Pizza has anthing to do with cookies?
@user-kl7mu7rz1n
@user-kl7mu7rz1n 7 місяців тому
the question actually translate into how to calculate dP... I forgot all my learning on derivatives of that part.
@oluwagbamila
@oluwagbamila 3 місяці тому
I got lost with the optimum constraints calculation, any help here please
@jela1277
@jela1277 3 роки тому
12:54 Where are these black and red dots he is talking about?
@heya-fq2nb
@heya-fq2nb 3 роки тому
Here maybe he's talking about the attainable and non attainable combinations where initially the dots were up to previous budget line but now they are within new budget line(black ones) and the remaining between new and previous budget line (red) are not attainable.
@yanneschen179
@yanneschen179 3 роки тому
I don’t understand 16:00 the question : Changing slope does not affect if one buy more cookies than pizza and overall decrease in income affect all. Please help me thanks
@jela1277
@jela1277 3 роки тому
Your question is hard to understand, but I can explain that because the slope is the ratio of the quantity of cookies to pizza, changing the slope means you change the quantity of cookies or pizza or both (see algebra)
@tianshuzhao6966
@tianshuzhao6966 3 роки тому
he is saying that the budget changes (since your disposable income decreases) but the proportion of trade-off between two products remains (since the price of each type remains and the value of each type for you is the same. i.e. the marginal substitution for you is the same). you see the parallel shift of the budget lines but the slope remains.
@lucayan7982
@lucayan7982 2 роки тому
where can i find the "math" part of the course. 19:15 he said they will do more mathmatically on friday
@rm2kmidi
@rm2kmidi 2 роки тому
I didn't go to MIT, but when I took Microeconomics we did all the math in our quiz sections and not during the lecture.
@lucayan7982
@lucayan7982 2 роки тому
@@rm2kmidi do you know how can I get quiz that they did?
@rm2kmidi
@rm2kmidi 2 роки тому
@@lucayan7982 not a quiz. Quiz sections are smaller class groups you attend, usually lead by a TA. So the students would be learning this on non-lecture days.
@rm2kmidi
@rm2kmidi 2 роки тому
@@lucayan7982 "Quiz Section" is what we call the smaller breakout classes in large lecture classes at universities in the US. It doesn't have anything to do with quizzes or taking tests. Typically you attend lecture three times a week and attend quiz section twice a week. I was just explaining that the math-oriented parts of this class were likely all discussed in smaller groups with the teaching assistant and probably wont be on video. At least that's how it was when I was in school.
@lucayan7982
@lucayan7982 2 роки тому
@@rm2kmidi thank you for the clarification
@user-dx7ox3uo4d
@user-dx7ox3uo4d Рік тому
Does anyone know where 0.5 comes from in 26:50 ? Thanks a lot!!
@fevengetachew1035
@fevengetachew1035 Рік тому
It is from derivation of the squareroot like the derivation of squareroot of xy is (1\2 times square root of xy )times the derivation of xy itself.....i am not sure if I explained it in understandable way but I suggest you to derivate the function by yourself first and crosscheck it
@anudeike
@anudeike 7 місяців тому
I think it comes from the fact that the Pizza is worth twice as much as the cookies so P_c/Pp = 0.5. Not sure exactly but that's what it seems.
@kloud1174
@kloud1174 Рік тому
I'm just a small successful business owner just soaking up this information. Don't mind me....
@user-ff1tv2ie2w
@user-ff1tv2ie2w 7 місяців тому
where did 0.5 come from when doing MUp and MUc?
@suindude8149
@suindude8149 2 місяці тому
These equation is quite tricky to make the indifference in the buying behaviour of the product in case of obtaining diligence of his entire family. It seems the Economics is tremendously the unitasking.
@tvvt005
@tvvt005 7 місяців тому
38:42 I still don’t get why there is a horizontal line from 5000 to x2, could someone explain?
@Michelle_Matchahan
@Michelle_Matchahan 7 місяців тому
hey hey. Because government gave the poors the debit card which can be only used for food, the people cannot use this money for shelters. Therefore, people cannot spend any money to shelters and now it has restricted in that 5000
@miltonfriedman5833
@miltonfriedman5833 2 роки тому
Does anyone know how to access the recitation for the course, or if its available.
@mitocw
@mitocw 2 роки тому
Recitations are not available for the course. To see what we do have, visit MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/14-01F18. Best wishes on your studies!
@miltonfriedman5833
@miltonfriedman5833 2 роки тому
@@mitocw tnx.
@dennis7928
@dennis7928 Рік тому
​@@mitocw QUESTION: minute 28.48 > " you're willing to give up 2.5 p for 1 c" is incorrect right? Looking at the graph (minute 29.18) the indifference curve looks like that you're willing to give up 2.5 p for 2 c as the interval on the x axis is not 1 but 2. Can someone either tell me that I am right, but more likely explain why I am wrong?
@deletedaccount2580
@deletedaccount2580 2 роки тому
I was searching for guy who post notes of lecture in comment . But sadly didn't find .
@vishnukanhan8809
@vishnukanhan8809 Рік тому
Same lol
@gytoser801
@gytoser801 Рік тому
19:36
@nox5282
@nox5282 Рік тому
Budget constrained is key to happiness
@frostylunetta
@frostylunetta 2 роки тому
If I were a Math/IT/Science student back at high school, and without budget constraints, I would have applied for MIT
@mitocw
@mitocw 2 роки тому
If you were that high school student, we would tell you to ignore the budget constraints and recommended you apply anyways. 🙂 MIT is need-blind and full-need. If you were accepted, MIT would make sure you could afford MIT tuition... even if they had to fully cover it. Visit sfs.mit.edu/undergraduate-students/the-cost-of-attendance/making-mit-affordable/ for more info.
@economics5595
@economics5595 10 місяців тому
@@mitocw this comment made my day today! :)
@sanajjang96
@sanajjang96 2 роки тому
27:27, where did the 0.5 come from??
@chaitanyasharma3921
@chaitanyasharma3921 2 роки тому
He differentiated root p*c, which is equal to 0.5 *C or P( depends on what is taken constant)/root of P*C
@bloodcarnage8285
@bloodcarnage8285 2 роки тому
Nice..
@elkyelkyelky
@elkyelkyelky Рік тому
2:00
@elkyelkyelky
@elkyelkyelky Рік тому
27:00
@user-hj2td8qs7j
@user-hj2td8qs7j Рік тому
My marginal utility is very high so i intend to attend mit
@oris2723
@oris2723 2 роки тому
Can y'all tell me why that cash given to Africans boosted their income in short run and the effect got nullified in long run?
@yellowusbrickus4821
@yellowusbrickus4821 2 роки тому
Probably something to do with structural inequality issues, for example an insurance firm may offer insurance to rich people, R or poor people, P. When P takes out insurance on their cheaper car, the risk of it breaking down are higher and therefore their insurance costs will be higher as a proportion of their income. This could take away P's ability to increase their wealth because the insurance costs eventually wear away their initial endowment. If the group used their money to buy cars to double their wages, they would not be able to afford good cars and thus they would be subject to high insurance costs, leading them back to a point of not being able to afford insurance or a car. This example is obviously not what happened but in built mechanisms can lead to greater wealth inequality over the longer term.
@codisordelet8380
@codisordelet8380 Рік тому
This course would be considered an intermediate microeconomics course at most universities.
@Andalusian_
@Andalusian_ 10 місяців тому
Think so too. They probably do the multivariable calculus in the side-lectures
@gunnarjensen5910
@gunnarjensen5910 3 роки тому
λ*, Mv = Mp ? The best deal. ? P = MR = MC ?
@suindude8149
@suindude8149 2 місяці тому
While price goes for Marginal revenue then there comes the law of diminishing returns in the case with Marginal cost equating price as well.
@shantanukhandkar
@shantanukhandkar 2 роки тому
Is this an undergraduate or graduate course?
@mitocw
@mitocw 2 роки тому
This is an undergraduate course. See ocw.mit.edu/14-01F18 for more info and materials. Best wishes on your studies!
@hish3098
@hish3098 Рік тому
3:30 they are delicious and equally expensive
@bulbulddd8
@bulbulddd8 3 роки тому
what is du/dp? 26:54 ?????????????????????????????????????????????????
@user-js4ez2yz9b
@user-js4ez2yz9b 3 роки тому
Derivative
@davidbarroso8523
@davidbarroso8523 3 роки тому
The derivative of a function (ax)^n is a*n*(ax)^(n-1) where a is a constant. The square root of PC is equivalent to saying (PC)^(1/2) or (PC)^0.5, so if you're deriving with respect to P, P is your x, C is a, and 0.5 is n, so the derivative would be C*0.5*(PC)^(0.5-1) or 0.5*C*(PC)^(-0.5). x^-n is equivalent to 1/(x^n), a negative power just means you move it to the denominator, so you get 0.5*C/(PC)^0.5, and again, x^0.5 is the same as square root of x, so finally you're left with 0.5*C/squareroot(PC). If you do it with respect to C, C is your x instead, you get 0.5*P/squareroot(PC). dU/dP means derivative of U w/ respect to P, dU/dC means derivative of U w/ respect to C.
@tianshuzhao6966
@tianshuzhao6966 3 роки тому
marginal utility of one unit of product A divided by that of product B. this indicating the marginal substitution between these two products to remain the same level of utility.
@oris2723
@oris2723 2 роки тому
Can y'all tell me why that cash given to Africans boosted their income in short run and the effect got nullified in long run?
@Auriga4
@Auriga4 6 місяців тому
Summary: sometimes we just have to tangent our Pp more often, it's called marginal utility.
@shoaibmalik2231
@shoaibmalik2231 2 роки тому
I am late but at perfect place
@primozbenedicto3501
@primozbenedicto3501 Рік тому
Interesting college professor
@robbyosborne9708
@robbyosborne9708 5 місяців тому
He definitely makes the subject of microeconomics interesting.
@siqihe7806
@siqihe7806 2 роки тому
Never thought of SNAP as paternalistic, make me think of universal income, maybe cash to everyone is not a bad thing.
@rm2kmidi
@rm2kmidi 2 роки тому
I feel like people shouldn't think of it as an entitlement but that their friends and neighbors that pay taxes want to help them, but want some say on how that money is spent. Also, wouldn't person y still be better off because it frees up $300 for more shelter. They're not $500 better, but they're not worse off.
@6and1
@6and1 3 місяці тому
AI push will eventually lead to a more universal income approach due to job losses but if you create a linear equation they haven't quite perfected the income but it's around $1250 a month. You would most likely need a a wide adoption of the digital dollar to track spending on illicit things
@martingenet8799
@martingenet8799 3 роки тому
46 min in
@user-re1su6el4l
@user-re1su6el4l Рік тому
👍👍
@spankyrodriguez007
@spankyrodriguez007 3 роки тому
MIT budget restraints why they use chalk boards? I'm so distracted by this poor guy struggling through the series and hung up thinking of the opportunity costs.
@GiorgiBochikashvili
@GiorgiBochikashvili 4 місяці тому
its 20 under the root, not 10.
@tammy6452
@tammy6452 2 роки тому
Move in with someone and give them your food stamps for shelter, go to the food bank for food.
@d2nd21st
@d2nd21st Рік тому
yup UBI everyone, its actually better than government subsidize programs and such😆
@muhammad-amiindhimbiil6066
@muhammad-amiindhimbiil6066 3 роки тому
We are forcing them on Food Stamps, because Someone who is below poverty line will use Cash for other purposes.
@aasemahsan
@aasemahsan 6 місяців тому
Simplying assumption: Budget=Income 5:25 MRT Shocking the System 17:05 *Constrained Choices* 30:58 Example of food stamps
@jsealejandro06
@jsealejandro06 День тому
vox being a good policy website? That just makes me misstrust completly the opinion of this Professor.
@sethkohn5517
@sethkohn5517 2 роки тому
I just gave this video it's 1k like, because I like pizza and cookies
@crisronaldo8365
@crisronaldo8365 8 місяців тому
If they need cash people in my country (BD) will sell their food for money 😂
@tyranmcgrath6871
@tyranmcgrath6871 3 роки тому
Funny how $12 for pizza is expensive in america
@Learn2SingInEnglish
@Learn2SingInEnglish 3 роки тому
why would it not be? hes talking about per slice
@tyranmcgrath6871
@tyranmcgrath6871 3 роки тому
@@Learn2SingInEnglish right you are
@tyranmcgrath6871
@tyranmcgrath6871 3 роки тому
That's some premium pizza
@Regular_guy798
@Regular_guy798 2 роки тому
Славяне на месте?
@williammuka2290
@williammuka2290 2 роки тому
So, what are cookies ?
@arunsinghmehra7728
@arunsinghmehra7728 3 роки тому
Nptel lectures are way better than mit courses but i thank mit for the free courses though...
@rakkhnaka
@rakkhnaka 2 роки тому
lol
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze
@SakshiSingh-xq1ze Рік тому
Not way better but both r comparable nd good for students like us(budget constraints)
@jat1339
@jat1339 Рік тому
Are bhai chup chap pdh le na , dono ache hai
@keki4578
@keki4578 3 роки тому
23:06 BIG PP
@mirshahid4966
@mirshahid4966 Рік тому
Me watching at 0.25 speed
@afbdreds
@afbdreds 3 роки тому
Food stamps don't buy diapers
@tasnimealami7846
@tasnimealami7846 3 роки тому
Please add Arabic subtitles
@pulkityogi-jf1xk
@pulkityogi-jf1xk 11 місяців тому
ab itne gandiwade me rhne ka koi matlab nhi h
@MohdAbuNaiyan
@MohdAbuNaiyan Рік тому
The professor talks too fast. Slow down..
4. Demand Curves and Income/Substitution Effects
49:31
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 234 тис.
1. Introduction and Supply & Demand
34:47
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 2,2 млн
skibidi toilet 73 (part 2)
04:15
DaFuq!?Boom!
Переглядів 31 млн
Budget Constraints
6:46
Marginal Revolution University
Переглядів 370 тис.
16. Portfolio Management
1:28:38
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 5 млн
26. Chernobyl - How It Happened
54:24
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 2,8 млн
Photons and the loss of determinism
17:21
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 887 тис.
MIT Introduction to Deep Learning | 6.S191
1:09:58
Alexander Amini
Переглядів 115 тис.
2. Preferences and Utility Functions
41:24
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 873 тис.
Necessity of complex numbers
7:39
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 2,4 млн
1. Why Finance?
1:14:17
YaleCourses
Переглядів 1,2 млн
Lecture 19: Dynamic Programming I: Fibonacci, Shortest Paths
51:47
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 2,8 млн
Lecture 1: Introduction to Superposition
1:16:07
MIT OpenCourseWare
Переглядів 7 млн