Slightly ? Come on... Break ball Dimitrov, Fed give him an ace on his 2nd serve...

@@RogerBiwanduslightly is the correct word. At that level in tennis, being slightly superior is enough to differentiate between 0 and 20 slams.

I don't think they're equally talented but yeah, small details make the difference between a historic champion and a very good player of a generation.

Actually, Dimitrov's shots are almost identical to Roger's, and they could be almost as effective as the swiss great's shots are... but what's different between them, is the way the two actually play the game. Federer is extremely aggressive, rarely accepts neutral rallies of more than a couple shots without driving the ball and trying to open the court, and he cuts angles superbly, closing a lot of points at the net with a very high percentage of success. Dimitrov Is as good as Roger at the net, but he's not nearly as good at cutting angles and rushing to the net (when he does, he has to run a much longer way to get to the net), he accepts much longer neutral rallies, putting much less pressure on his opponents, and he tends to trust too much his defensive skills.... which of course are very good, but such a player should tend to play mostly offensive tennis, saving his defensive skills and his stamina for when he really need them We've to say that this season he's playing more offensively than ever, though.

@@pierdomenicosommati443as good as roger at the net? Are you okay? Rog is the best volleyer of all tine

He still has years

I'm not sure since he had to fight federer, djokovic and Nadal. Grand slams I don't think so, some masters probably.

Honestly I’d say Fed is an A+ and Dimi is an A-, the difference in level is very small but important among top players. A C player would be about Top 300

you must blind then.

His toilet breaks have legendary numbers as well. 😅😅😅