4 YEARS with the PANASONIC 12-35 II f2.8 (REVIEW + FOOTAGE)
Переглядів 36,050
3 роки томуLet's review the video capabilities and take a look at tons of example footage of the Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 12-35 f/2.8 ii. My review is based on over 4 years of use with the lens paired with my Panasonic GH5. I'll talk about what I liked about the lens and what I didn't like. If you're not interested in the lens itself, maybe you'll be interested in the variety of example footage I shot with it.
Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 ii
amzn.to/3gCEpcn
90% of this travel film shot with this lens
• BOLIVIA | Cinematic Tr...
40% of film shot with this lens
• SRI LANKA | Cinematic ...
🎨 Get the PRO LOOK you're looking for 🎨
www.fcpcolorgradingmasterclass...
▶️ TRY MY LUT PACKS | www.dylanjohndickerson.com/luts
▶️ FILMIC BURN PACK | www.dylanjohndickerson.com/fi...
▶️ FULL GEAR LIST | www.dylanjohndickerson.com/gear
🤙🏼 BECOME A PART OF MY UKposts CHANNEL MEMBERSHIP! 🌴
geni.us/CreatorClub
---------------------------------------------------------
✏️ MY FAVORITE FCPX PLUG INS
For travelers! | geni.us/mJourney
Amazing filmic transitions | geni.us/mTransitionFilmRoll
3D tracking in FCP! | geni.us/mTracker3D
Realistic, trackable flares | geni.us/mFlare2MotionVFX
Awesome music video plugin | geni.us/mMusicVideo
They made another! | geni.us/mMusicVideo2
Cinematic Lighting Effects | geni.us/mMovieLightss
Glitchy cinematic transition pack | geni.us/mTransitionNoise
Apple-style titles | geni.us/mTitleKinetic2
Must have for UKpostsrs | geni.us/mTuber3
Must have for social media | geni.us/mShorts
How I zoom in and out | geni.us/ProZooms
Best PIP effect | geni.us/FCBPictureinPicture
Professional Color Grading Plug In | geni.us/ColorFinale
Remove Video Noise Easily | geni.us/neatvideo
Most realistic filmic effect | geni.us/Dehancer
Amazing cinematic titles | geni.us/mTitleCinematic2
📲 WEBSITES I LOVE
Artlist | geni.us/Artlist2freemonths (get 2 months free w/this link!)
Professional Stock Footage | geni.us/artgridvideo
Great for your UKposts Channel | geni.us/wiVsHx
Cut up your videos with AI | geni.us/editquickly
✌🏼Follow me on social media!
FACEBOOK
👉 / dylanjohnvideo
TIKTOK
👉 / dylanjohndickerson
INSTAGRAM
👉 / dylanjohndickerson
WEBSITE (Courses/LUTs/FCP Resources)
👉 www.dylanjohndickerson.com
PS: Some of the links in this description are affiliate links and I get a small kick back for them at no extra cost to you. Thanks for your support!
👉 www.dylanjohnmedia.com
PS: Some of the links in this description are affiliate links and I get a small kick back for them at no extra cost to you. Thanks for your support!
-----------------------------------------------------------
#panasonic12-35 #lensreview #examplefootage
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
My older travel film shot ENTIRELY with this lens (and a Mavic Pro drone) ukposts.info/have/v-deo/jph4qplrkKtq02Q.html 🌴Subscribe for more videos 🌴 bit.ly/DylanJohnSubscribe
@PhiTienAiNiLifestyle 11 місяців тому
Really appreciate your wit, quick, and professional about this! Love it!
@dylanjohndickerson 11 місяців тому
My pleasure! Thanks for watching and commenting 😊
@PhiTienAiNiLifestyle 11 місяців тому
@@dylanjohndickerson 🇳🇱🇺🇸💛🙏
@AiurMedia 3 роки тому
Beautiful footage, nice review
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
Thanks so much!
@marcopervo 3 роки тому
Footage shot with M43 lenses is reminiscent of that of the ENG broadcast cameras I used to shoot with. They are fine for photography or daytime run-n-gun video, when a clinical, interlaced look is less of an issue.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
Ya agreed Marc. There are some M43 lenses that I think have a minimized 'clinical' look, however the Pana 12-35 isn't one of them. Shooting in a LOG profile did help though.
@SVCN Рік тому
Hi! Are the 12-35 and 12-60 the same except that one has a constant aperture and the other does not have the same focal length? Do they have the same anti-shake effect? Thanks!
@dylanjohndickerson Рік тому
Hey! I don't know enough about the 12-60 to accurately answer that question. I'm sorry!
@cjevan9837 Рік тому
12-35mm is more towards professionals and features weather sealing.
@SVCN Рік тому
@@cjevan9837 Thank you!
@marike1100 Рік тому
The images look incredible in this video, both the content and the technical execution are next level. Congrats.
@dylanjohndickerson Рік тому
Thank your so much, Markus! That means a lot 👊
@dennyyshmael 2 роки тому
Anyone know if the Lens image stabilization will work with the IBIS on a Olympus E-M10 miii at the same time on stills mode?
@MrRoFella 11 місяців тому
Great video. You got any preference for sweet spots of this lens at the far end of aperture? For a deep depth of field? :)
@dylanjohndickerson 11 місяців тому
Thanks so much! I do not. I haven't had the lens for awhile now so I forget specifics about it. Sorry about that.
@JustinMannMedia Рік тому
How well was the focus ring for video? I know those focus by wire lenses are tricky to manual focus with. Torn between this lens and the Olympus 12-40. Mainly because the Olympus has a manual focus clutch.
@dylanjohndickerson Рік тому
It was okay. I've never tried the Olympus 12-40 so I can't quite say which is better.
@swiftdetecting Рік тому
what mount did you get for the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM ? also did u try it with adapter with m43?
@dylanjohndickerson Рік тому
I believe the Viltrox? I forget which model I had. And the 12-35 is an m43 mount. No need for an adapter.
@brunobader5046 7 днів тому
Unfortunately, the sigma lacks the electronic lens correction to a Panasonic lens and in addition you hardly use 18 mm in an indoor room or for portrait photography
@MaximeCheminade 3 роки тому
Had you tried using some diffusion filter ? like a pro mist or something like this ?
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
When I was using this lens, no, however that would’ve helped with that digital look I was talking about.
@DiscoverWithDima 2 роки тому
Awesome review dude, I'm a MFT shooter for a long time now but want to upgrade to a higher quality lens than the 12-60mm Panasonic kit lens. Been shooting a lot of content that I want to shine and this lens can do just that.
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
Thanks brotha! You'll love the lens. Also, I've attached a link to a review of by far my favorite micro four thirds lens. It may be one of my favorite lens period. Pair that with the 12-35 II and you're freakin set. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/pH6oi2ONj6yC0nk.html
@markshirley01 2 роки тому
Do you think the GH6 would be good with this lens with the better lowlight and auto focus. PS: I actually liked the digital look - I want my vertical clips to look more like they weren't shot on a pro body for insta and tiktok clients if that makes sense to you.
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
Ah that totally makes sense! More of a 'genuine'/candid look if you will. I think the lens would be a great fit for the new GH6. Have you looked into the Olympus 40-150 f2.8? That's my favorite lens for micro four thirds.
@markshirley01 2 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson no I haven't thanks - I'll take a look. 👍
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
@@markshirley01 Cool cool. I also have a video review on my channel of the lens if you want to see some footage examples.
@Daniel.K.Crandall 10 місяців тому
If you're familiar with the Blackmagic system - do you have any insight if the digital sharpness would be softened if shooting in BRAW on a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema 4K camera (in the "film" setting)?
@dylanjohndickerson 10 місяців тому
I am not familiar with the Blackmagic system
@A1Bokeh 2 роки тому
What camera are you shooting with now
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
The Sony A7siii ukposts.info/have/v-deo/oGh6gK6Ro4uKuIE.html
@weedeeohguy 2 роки тому
Follow the flock?
@FIRUFILMS 2 роки тому
hello the f stop is f2.8 in al range? from 12 to 35 ?
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
That's correct! It's an f2.8 constant
@FIRUFILMS 2 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson Thanks!
@SiliconPrairie 3 роки тому
What do you mean by "too sharp"? Just a bit too pixelated? I'm planning on getting one for my GH5S and I've never seen my current lens look too digital or shap. I've always like sharp footage. I can always de-focus if I need to. Currently, I have the 25mm Panasonic f1.7.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
I mean it has more of a digital camera look instead of a film camera look (however it is a digital camera so it makes ). But ya, maybe too pixelated. If you like sharp then this lens is perfecto. You’ll enjoy it.
@SiliconPrairie 3 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson Do you think that these sharper lenses can be compensated for with VHS/filmic effect plugins in Premiere Pro and such? For example, Universe VHS from Red Giant. It's what Kung Fury used, and that looks very VERY analog.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
@@SiliconPrairie I think adding some type of grain or really dialing down the sharpness in camera can minimize that look. I did notice the shooting in V-Log really helped out as well.
@A1Bokeh 2 роки тому
@@SiliconPrairie pro mist filter
@housevibez8828 2 роки тому
So the footage you showed in this video was all from the Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 ii ? Some people say that the power ois stabilisation does not work well, and that the image jumps when you pan with the stabilisation on. Is that right? What do you say to that after using it for such a long time, is it true, can it be used without a gimbal? Thanks in advance.
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
That’s correct. Everything with that lens. And I’ve never had an issue with jumping when I pan with stabilization on. That was my main lens I’d use for gimbal work and it worked great. Yes it most definitely can be used without a gimbal. I switched over to the Sony A7siii and the one thing I really miss from the GH5 and that lens is the incredible stabilization. It’s like you’re using a gimbal just by holding it (obviously not exactly, but it’s pretty damn impressive).
@housevibez8828 2 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson Sounds good and looks good! Great footage. Thanks for the answer, im glad the image did not jump. The person that sayd it was using the bmpcc 4k maybe because this camera has no internal stabilisation, idk.
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
@@housevibez8828 Thanks man! Glad to help!
@Kniesoor Рік тому
@@housevibez8828 maybe I.S. lock was on in camera. This has to be off when panning videos because when its on, the stabilization tries to correct your panning.
@myzingiber1510 2 роки тому
nice clip, i'm used lumix gx85 with 20mm f1.7 now i interest and looking for 12-35mm. Thank you for review.
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
You’re welcome! Thanks for watching ☺️
@FishVisionsMedia Рік тому
Can I put this on my S5?
@dylanjohndickerson Рік тому
You cannot. This is a micro four thirds lens and the S5 is a full frame camera
@DiscoZocker 3 роки тому
What’s your new camera ? 🧐
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
It’s the Sony A7siii 🎥
@saigonvideographer9828 3 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson sad you not gh5 fan anymore you broke my heart bro hahaha let meet for coffe in d2 something.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
@@saigonvideographer9828 Haha I will always be a GH5 fan brotha ❤️ Let's do it!
@arturkechter9631 3 роки тому
man, i miss La Paz...
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
You and me both Arthuro. There’s something magical about that city.
@sacredxgeometry Рік тому
Didn't seem too sharp for me. Also the Dual Native ISO of the GH6 and GH5 ii, is good enough to taper the lack of _speed_ of an f2.8 aperture indoors. With that said I am normally a full frame shooter in all capacities so my understanding of light comes from both film cameras and 2nd generation DSLRs (2008-2016ish). 3rd generation is mostly Mirrorless and some powerful new DSLRs as well, but my time with m4/3 is quite short, so I don't have a grasp yet of how well it handles light. Still? I have shot with a GH5 indoors at a concert using this lens. Perfect to me, thus far. Only lens to come out on top against this is the 10-25, which is a 20-50 equivalent, and it's a 1.7! Effing incredible
@JoseManuel-video 2 роки тому
12 35, micro jitters?
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
Nope! It's a stabilized lens so it's buttery smooth for most shots
@Kainthemain 2 роки тому
Why not buy the gh6 and keep the lens for that?
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
Because I jumped ship and bought an A7siii.
@Kainthemain 2 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson yeah good choice. But gh6 is around the corner. If you like Panasonic I would have waited for that. Alsono think Sony will be getting a new camera soon
@dylanjohndickerson 2 роки тому
@@Kainthemain I've already invested too much into Sony now. The a7siii fits all my needs so I'm chillin for awhile
@neaumusic Рік тому
sigma 18-35 is so heavy
@dylanjohndickerson Рік тому
That it is.
@ThomasHalways 3 роки тому
The lens is "too sharp"? You just got the Grand Price for Bizarre.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
A digital look? Yep, a common opinion about the lens. Thanks for the prize 🤙🏼
@user-su8st1gi3h 3 місяці тому
Never heard of it.
@VoicesofMusic 3 роки тому
It's a great lens, but sadly not as good as the Olly 12-40 or even the Panny 12-35 first version. So there is no reason to consider it.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
Not better than the first version huh? Why is that? I have heard the Olympus 12-40 is great.
@VoicesofMusic 3 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson First version is sharper for some reason, even accounting for sample variation. The pannys are more compact than the olly.
@dylanjohndickerson 3 роки тому
@@VoicesofMusic very interesting. I wonder why that is.
@VoicesofMusic 3 роки тому
@@dylanjohndickerson I know, right? It's more like cars than cameras.
@thedexterbros 2 роки тому
image stab
The Hybrid Shooter
Переглядів 147 тис.
5 канал
Переглядів 797 тис.
Caleb Hoover
Переглядів 15 тис.
The Filmmaker Journey
Переглядів 841
Micro Four Nerds
Переглядів 27 тис.
Caleb Hoover
Переглядів 51 тис.
gen x tech guy
Переглядів 77 тис.
Крінж Жопіль
Переглядів 301 тис.
ТНТ4 Shorts
Переглядів 730 тис.
Ахалаймахалай
Переглядів 8 млн