Every time Gary comes he explains.... in a way no one does

I’m just sitting here waiting for that 0nm chip

Summary: next year's mobile phones are going to be better than this year's.

and intel still struggle with making 10nm processor

Intel: Wait, that's illegal.

I wish Qualcomm would release their flagship processor earlier And I mean putting them in actual phones much earlier Apple and Huwawei launch their new SOCs around October and put them in actual phones that we can buy the same month On the other hand we have to wait till March of the next year to get the new Snapdragon SOCs in actual phones, that's 5 months from when Apple and Huwawei provide them, almost a half a year late!! That really sucks! And you get brands like Google's Pixel, Oneplus T series and Asus ROG phones launching around October/November with previous generation SOCs, promoting them as cutting edge flagships and pricing them at that level when the iPhones and the Huwawei mate phones are one generation ahead It's really frustrating

Wow mind blown,so who else just has a hard on for lithography as I do,I never realised the factor 0.7 pattern till Gary explained my love of processors is rekindled

Imo snapdragon 875 is supposed to be competing with a14 bionic. And 865 with a13. Because the gap Is very little between when the chipsets are announced and released.

Just stumbled on your channel. Loving it!

your videos are so great because they are so dense in knowledge and you know how to exlain things simple. i would really enjoy a channel where you explain things more in depth too.

*GARY!* *Good Afternoon Professor!* *Good Afternoon Fellow Classmates!*

lovely explanation Gary, this is what we play for :D indeed, density hasn't been increasing linearly, but things like finfet made them so they could pack things in a shorter density without really decreasing the feature size to the same degree because of finding other way to reduce leakage/arcing to nearby transistors. i still remember them moving from copper to aluminum to reach higher package densities in the 90s too i also remember the 10ghz future claims made in those days, but the truth is, we're hitting a hard wall considering lithography on aluminium that makes anything beyond 5-6 ghz pretty much unfeasable, especially if you want to remain power efficient. the only way to really keep up with moore's law right now, is width (core count at lower speeds) many of the methods used right now are using 2 passes of a higher density, offset by half, to approximate double density historically, intel has een closest to transistor density:package size ratio, and therefor closest to the true number. but package size isn't the be al end all either, i remember some iphones had 2 versions of a CPU, 1 being a samsung 14nm, the other a 16nm TSMC, the TSMC was both more power efficient, and clocked higher. ofcourse LP and LPP and the such matters too, the former usually not clocking as high but very often used for server-grade hardware that isn't after the highest clock speeds, but aims for power efficiency instead. (this is why considering ryzen gen1 a server design gone mainstream is a pretty apt description, r7-1700 may be the most efficient mainstream desktop cpu to date even now) i guess there was a reason nvidia stuck to the TSMC 16nm for longer for their graphics cards, better results, and likely lower wafer costs, who could turn their backs on a deal like that ;)

This needs a million views. This guy knows what's up... And that's coming from a former semiconductor researcher!

Very informative and helpful. Loved the way you convey technical information in a simple language. 👍👍

I really was waiting for this, thank you sir.

Is your background your kitchen? Or is it a green screen of your kitchen?

Nice video but I am still a bit confused on that fin FET part and how chips are made and marketed nowadays as a smaller nm chip, I get the density but exactly how are fin FET transistors made?

That's good news. Was considering swapping out my Poco F1 for a SD865 phone this year, but now, I'm going to wait for the 5nm chip next year. Thanks for the update Gary!

Really liked the video, you have a new subscriber, great content

Gary please compare the the differences between brands at "same" nm process like zen+ zen2, Intel qcom Intel tlsc, till this video y think all nm where the same in term of scale between brandings beyond the architecture used, cheers from Argentina 🇦🇷, love your channel

I knew there is going to be another even smaller size after 7 that no one expected. So oh well glad I still stick with my 835 still strong enough for now till when the gap got much further then I'll upgrade.

Hmm 875 for sure but will they release a early version as 865+. Gary can you make a video later about the GPU updates that will be pushed with the google play store with the 865.

So, G man, what is the physical size of the gate, or the whole transistor on a 5nm transistor? Also, does this mean that a quantum barrier busting 3.5nm chip is now on the cards for 2022?

So basically by the upcoming year we will hold a phone that can pack more than +100 M transistors. Absoluteley mindblowing! And awesome explanaition of how transistors work!

Well done. You explain it well.

Hi Gary, years ago there was talk about not getting smaller than 32nm as the machinery vibrated more than this. Something about natural harmonics of the machines etc. So how can they make 5nm chips ? Why aren't they all blurred.

Just to put this in perspective, when I started, devices were 10 micron (10,000nm).The other thing is that an individual silicon atom is 0.2nm so the line width is a mere 25 atoms wide.

Good one Gary!

it's must to be great power eficiency for IOT with 5 nm technology!

Will chips contribute to shrink? Is it true that quantum tunneling becomes an issue if we get any smaller?

We are near 1nm chip . Thanks I have Lenovo g580 laptop with 28nm i3 processor.

Every time best content Sir

Okay, thanks for the informative video, but can you explain me, why SD 865 is still 7nm as 855 was and then where is the difference in terms of power efficient and performance? Generally power efficient. Thank you in advance 😊

What about quantom tunneling, it should effect right

Good video as usual

I dont understanding one thing, why not jump directly from lets say 90nm to 10 nm? Why did they need to go step by step? One generation needs the previous one in order to evolve? Or is that to avoid big jumps in performance and let people keep buying again and again each generation?

Isn't the node nm telling you at what resolution they print, which then affects how small the transistor can be?

Why You Did Not Metione The Kirin 990 5G In Your Eplains???

Thank you ASML GRUP

SO, I guess this is an ignorant question: There's the manufacturing process (by Intel or Qualcomm or whatever) and there's the chip design by say ARM. Can you use the same chip design on a smaller process? Could you use whatever the design is for some current 7nm chip and just do it on 5nm? Or is the design very closely tied to the process?

Are CPU and gpu on the same chip or apart?

Hello Gary. I know it's a little off base, but can you explain OnePlus's new feature of accelerated download. Thanks

Is it going to be much faster?

Hi Gary! I hope you're doing well

How fast will be the zero nanometer chip?

5nm has been out for a while now. TMSC has had the process since last year.

The nm count isnt the real count like you said. But they usually just state the cpu or gpus total transistor count on the entire die. Which you woupd then divide by the nm number and you would get how many of those transistors are in each 7nm squared.

Can someone explain why Apple is ahead in performance every year, when TSMC is generally the supplier of the latest node to Apple, Qualcomm etc. Is it due to the release cycle of their phones due to the time of year? I'm no Apple fan boy but that's one argument they seem to always have validly as apple is usually ahead for 5 months until the next Qualcomm chipset.

@Gary Explains, I have learnt from the internet that Samsung built 8nm exynos SoC. 10nm--> 8nm and then 7nm comes??

I'm so glad I bought a Xiaomi MI Mix 3 5G for a fairly affordable price last year. It's got Snapdragon 855 and the X50 chip. This year's chips (865 and X55) seem to be a fairly minor improvement, so I'll keep it until the next year when we'll see real improvements. Until then if 5G is rolled out in my area, I'm covered, the 855 has me covered for any workload, so it was a great investment.

I always feel a tad bit smarter after watching Gary.

Still watching on my 28nm processor 😥. Considering swapping with a 7nm this year but wait.....???

Good video. It was understandable 😁

What kind of lithography is used for 7 and 5 nm?

I hope they will come up with Adreno 700 series this time.. & Snapdragon 700 series processor should also need to have tri cluster (1+3+4) with little lower clock speed than 865 etc.. who all agree with me ?

Garry can you tell me about SD 730G ,you said companies go down by 0.7× from their previous chipset so 10×0.7=7,then how 730G is working on 8nm process

Nice video 👍

Hmm Gary, let me explain!! Please make the white images a little smaller on screen next time, I nearly blind watching this video last night..😎

So when will we get phones with this chip?

what is about atmega and stm32 on 5 nm teh?

Ty

Gary please tell me; does snapdragon work in middle east because of carrier thing , I live in iraq and I want to buy note 10 plus snapdragon from amazon and some say it won't work in middle east , is that true ? Does anybody know ?

What is the width limit? Does this mean intel is far behind the tech of Qualcomm and Samsung?

This is a dumb question but can't they just make bigger chips? With 5nm transistors or whatever you call it? Then they can fit a lot more millions of them right? Because we are approaching the limit of how small we can make the transistors

I think this channel needs some visuals cause the average curious guy(me) doesn't get anything you're sayin but linus' vid helped much more

Wohoo!

best process of finfet is from samsung tsmc has too much load on it. I have used samsung ones in iphone se It was much better than tsmc version initially battery drain was from samsung at 14nm and heated and tsmc used much larger die size but after updates it got resolved with an undervolt and underclock in stress now Samsung handled much better like 8% better.I did find some stuttering but all went smooth. I favor tsmc but now samsung is heating up

What I don't get is how to read from those tiny transistors, how to get the current state of billion of transistors?

I hope OnePlus 8T Pro McLaren (when it launches later this year) will have the x60 chip.

I think 5nm is the physical area of the transistor and not the whole area of conductive element

It's going to keep going to we see .07 nano technology.

Is lowering capacitance the main they are doing?

Where is the limit?

I wonder can they make chip that stay in 7-10nm but hv 2-3x performance? Example: 1st gen flagship 7nm chipset hv 500k score benchmatk, but in the next gen of 7nm, the score is doubled become 1000k-1500k.

Legends says that this chip is cooling the device

I can't wait for 90 picometer nodes 😁

interesting times we live in now, either we break the limit of silicon chips or switch to graphene

Hopefully it comes out sooner, like the end of this year. Like the SDM 865+ 5nm.

I'm still enjoying my 855+ 7nm Chip and I'm loving it.

Gary so what about iphone 12 will use X55 modem from qualcomm ? alot of source i research that iPhone will be use qualcomm modem chip for at least the next generation ip by 2024 so it's looks like apple it doesn't have it's own modem to get a third party modem and borrowing from Qualcomm Lol

That's about 10 by 10 atoms (by the number of atoms in a pcb layer) for a single transistor. Insane. We are two orders of magnitude away from picotechnology.

Meanwhile cadence installed in my university only has 45nm

Waiting for your Exynos 990 v Snapdragon 865 test.

Snapdragon still needs singlecore improvements as compared to A13

I think it was because of some business matters that Qualqomm went with TSMC and not that it was better.

Smaller MOSFETS are not exactly more efficient. They tend to leak more current when in an "Off state" the smaller you make them.

🤩🤩👍

Anything beyond 3nm will happen? I'll be waiting for that with my 28nm 1+ ... lol

Gary Is My Guardian Angel In The Afterlife! 😎

if it is samsung 5nm for sd875 then wait for 885 XD or gonna wait for sd895 3nm, I think 7nm 3nm 1nm is a good upgrade than 7nm to 5nm to 3nm i mean that every nm they make it for 2 year like 7nm and 7nm+ so 2021 5nm 2022 5nm+ and 2023 is 3nm ??? sorry to my english

Sir, Please make a video on " f " Aperture of the Mobile Camera. Whenever a mobile is launched We hear f2.2, f1.8, f this, f that...very Confusing ...What is that affects on Camera performance (if any) and what does that mean for a Buyer. ??? What is a Good Aperture? Thank You for all other videos, Very Informative, #BIGFAN

much better if you have animations to explain this

A professor indeed.

What next after 5nm?

Even "RISC"-based CPUs, in my opinion, are getting too complicated. Out-of-order instruction, speculative execution, major cache management, etc. I have designed a general-purpose processor with only 16 instructions with no multiplexing and no microcode. Straight, hard-wired instructions. It will run like a BEAST on an FPGA, and be super easy to program, even at the Assembly level.

Great

I like thick cut ones

I have a real question when will we see a mobile chip that can support PC graphics?

You remind me of the lecturer in my college

Then lately that sd875 would be on ROG3