64 MAJOR Differences Between SHOGUN (1980) and SHOGUN (2024)

  Переглядів 144,806

Think Story

Think Story

17 днів тому

In this video we look at some of the major differences and compare SHOGUN the miniseries (1980) with the FX/Hulu SHOGUN (2024).
SHOGUN Ending Explained: • SHOGUN Ending Explained!
Check out my other Comparison Videos here: • Crazy Cool Comparisons
FOLLOW ME:
Twitter: / thinkstoryyt
Instagram: / thinkstoryyt
TikTok: / thinkstory
#Shogun #FX #Hulu

КОМЕНТАРІ: 747
@ThinkStory
@ThinkStory 16 днів тому
Which SHOGUN reigns supreme? Check out my SHOGUN Ending Explained here: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aHmLh6-nmY-Ul6c.html
@jp16k92
@jp16k92 15 днів тому
Which Shogun reigns supreme? Well, read and loved the book, loved the 80s series and have mixed feeling about the new version. I like it but it is too far from the original material and missing some great moments. Granted, there are some great moments here too, but for me, the original still reigns supreme!
@jp16k92
@jp16k92 15 днів тому
And by the way, all the scenes that differ were invented for the new series. The original stuck close to the book. As for Ishido, his fate was even worse in the book: passersby were invited to saw his head with a bamboo saw!
@stephanclemens2348
@stephanclemens2348 14 днів тому
Difficult Judgement. Overall I would recommend the current one more as the old one probably looks a bit silly and too colorful for a modern audience but the old version has aspects in which it is vastly superior. Richard Chamberlain being a Star would be one of them.
@CardPicker-xo2hg
@CardPicker-xo2hg 14 днів тому
@1:24 "some boiled" no, it was only 1.
@amgdirect
@amgdirect 14 днів тому
I still prefer the original miniseries. I enjoy getting more Toranaga in this one, but the original characters all loomed so larger than life. I liked the fact that the new show was able to embellish and flesh out details and events, but do much of the romance and intrigue felt lost on the new series. A narration would have been better, also, with the option to remove the subs and let the narrator summarize events, as in the original. Overall, I give the new series a B+, and the original gets an A. It would get an A+ but it IS a dated miniseries, in parts.
@amgdirect
@amgdirect 16 днів тому
The priests wore orange because in Japan, that was the color worn by Buddhist monks, and this was how western priests would show the commoners they were spiritual men, which gave them a social standing among the Japanese.
@poggamus4330
@poggamus4330 16 днів тому
Yea orange would have been way too distracting in the modern version.
@EarJuice
@EarJuice 16 днів тому
Only for a short period. Traditional priests came over and were like yo what u doing bro. Get dem blacks back on. Orange was short lived and wrong for the exact time period.... so computer told me.
@rayjones597
@rayjones597 16 днів тому
Yes, that's true, but at the time the series takes place, the priests were back in their traditional clothing, so the new show is accurate.
@Hibernicus1968
@Hibernicus1968 15 днів тому
@@EarJuice Actually, it was a specific individual of the senior Jesuits -- a man named Francisco Cabral -- showing up in Japan, and saying "nope, you're out of uniform." He reimposed the black cassocks.
@Yamigata
@Yamigata 15 днів тому
Yeah. I found this VERY quickly in a Google search. No idea why the guy in the video couldn't.
@andriswood5434
@andriswood5434 14 днів тому
I grew up with the 1980 version, and NO ONE can beat the charisma and genius of Toshiro Mifune!
@Cryptonymicus
@Cryptonymicus 12 днів тому
Toshiro Mifune could intimidate an army with a glance.
@andriswood5434
@andriswood5434 12 днів тому
@@Cryptonymicus He's definitely someone you would follow into Hell!
@martinfiedler4317
@martinfiedler4317 10 днів тому
Richard Chambelain is difficult to replace in terms of charisma and presence, either. The new actor definitively had the lower ground...
@DanCThorpe
@DanCThorpe 10 днів тому
If your ever thinking on wearing a man bun, ask yourself are you Toshiro Mifune. If the answer is no. Don't wear a man bun.
@andriswood5434
@andriswood5434 10 днів тому
@@DanCThorpe 🤣🤣🤣
@easternlights3155
@easternlights3155 16 днів тому
The 80s version was closer to the source material in some ways, but the 2024 version was closer to actual Japanese culture. As much as he surely researched, Clavell made a lot of mistakes in that department, and the 80s version stuck to them. The new version corrected them while staying true to the spirit of the source material. Focusing primarily on Toranaga rather than Blackthorn was a good decision as well. Following him from the start, the '24 version makes us feel like we're getting to know him, which is why the ending reveal of the true depth of his ambition is such a gut punch. We thought we knew him, but we knew nothing at all, which ties greatly into the motif of hiding one's "secret heart". Hiroyuki Sanada was an inspired choice to cast as Toranaga. He brings as much gravitas and charisma as the late great Toshiro Mifune, but he also brings his incredible talent for portraying emotions so subtle you barely notice them, but also so genuine you never doubt their sincerity. His Toranaga is not merely defined by his cunning, ruthlessness and ambition. He comes off as a man who genuinely grieves the loss of lives he has to trade for victory, but is also so utterly convinced that his path is the only right one that he will not stray from it, no matter the cost. He is a much more complex character than both the novel and 80s version, which is why I prefer this iteration.
@SkankyBurnedToast
@SkankyBurnedToast 15 днів тому
I know your not throwing shade at the 1980's version but I thought itt would be nice to point out that they didnt have internet in the 80's, atleast not like we do. The historical accuracy is because of time and more accessibility to historical documents.
@matthewmob2860
@matthewmob2860 15 днів тому
Well said. His daughter even says it. He did much research but didn’t want to try to tell Japanese history. He fantasized about it and loved the culture he made his book and it a master piece. This 24 version was a Japanese point of view and Hiroyuki is a master of these types of Japanese film and knows the historical character very well. He’s done an amazing job acting and producing. Loved all versions.
@geoffmaloney2717
@geoffmaloney2717 15 днів тому
@@matthewmob2860 yes she said he researched for two years before writing a word, but he always said he was to entertain first and was not an historian. Interesting character, PoW in the infamous Changi Prison in Singapore in WWII goes on to write a couple of books on Japan and quite a few on Asia itself.
@grandmufftwerkin9037
@grandmufftwerkin9037 15 днів тому
​@@geoffmaloney2717 More than telling history I think Clavell tried to capture something more philosophical. Almost all his novels are about the clash of cultures, and finding a bridge in between, as well as survival under difficult circumstances. I think Clavell discovered more about human nature in those camps than any of us will ever know.
@geoffmaloney2717
@geoffmaloney2717 15 днів тому
@@grandmufftwerkin9037 so well put
@geoffmaloney2717
@geoffmaloney2717 15 днів тому
People dont realise what a cultural event the 1980's version was. There were sections in newspapers with translations of multiple japanese words so western audiences could follow. Obviously was on Network TV so it could only be watched at that time and the scenes were timed to fit into advertisement breaks. The version was a complete departure from what was presented to western audiences at that time. Nothing before had been so widely watched from an Asian cultural perspective. I was a young 20 year old when it aired, loved it, read all the Clavell books after it and loved it more. About 20 years ago bought the DVD. Upon reviewing it, I thought while the story was good, the production values were poor and the music gratingly terrible and very early 80's. Never like Chamberlain as Blackthorne. The 2024 version was told from all perspectives not from just Blackthorne's. Not a criticism of the 1980's version the choice to have the audience in the dark like Blackthorne was good and just added to the alien nature of the Japanese culture. 2024 was from three main character perspectives with many other characters fleshed out. Blackthorne was our gateway to the rules of etiquette, manners, culture and philosophy of 16th century Japan. The production values, music, acting and writing of the 2024 outstripped almost anything I have seen in a series in years. It brought us along with the Japanese mindset of Toranaga to the point that an epic ending battle would have been a contradiction to the whole series and most of us have understood that. Both series had their merits, however as an original watcher and lover of Shogun, I am so grateful they made the 2024 version. 1980's was great entertainment, 2024 was almost Shakespearian.
@ChrisLiptan
@ChrisLiptan 14 днів тому
This. I watched it in the 80s and was totally captivated but rewatching it this year was painful due to reasons you mentioned. The production value of the 2024 version is 10/10.
@todglenn2707
@todglenn2707 12 днів тому
I can recall people who watched the 80s series picking up bits of Japanese. Wakarimasu ka? Wakarimashita. It was weird watching the new series and still remembering some of the phrases.
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
@@todglenn2707 I agree. It was almost impossible NOT to learn some Japanese from the '80s version. But I don't know if it is just my hearing, but in the '24 version, were some pronounced differently? I wondered if that represented changes in Japanese pronunciation as a whole. I agree with @geofmaloney though. The earlier series had some pretty awful acting at times, and that fucking music! I thought the original Mirako was absolutely gorgeous, just a huge shame about her later 'career'.
@keithyonick5023
@keithyonick5023 11 днів тому
@@davebox588 I couldn't follow the Japanese in the 2024 for the most part, whereas, like you said, in the 1980's versin, it was pretty impossible not to pick up some of the Japanese phrases.
@davebox588
@davebox588 10 днів тому
@@keithyonick5023 I've read since that this later series uses Japanese as spoken at the time. That would explain it I think. Maybe just as Shakespearean English is different but understandable to modern English ears, so some Japanese words are the same while others were probably phrased or pronounced differently. Maybe a shame not to continue the Japanese lessons, but this series isn't really for purely Western ears. Historical research globally has moved so far in the last forty years and in these more globalised times people are often more interested in their history.
@SOYCD99
@SOYCD99 16 днів тому
Can't wait for the 2068 version to come out.
@qetoun
@qetoun 15 днів тому
any day now.
@ilkinsuleymanzad8252
@ilkinsuleymanzad8252 14 днів тому
Starring black lesbian Mariko who fells in love with gay Anjin with robotic arm.
@Puffdamgcdragon
@Puffdamgcdragon 13 днів тому
@@ilkinsuleymanzad8252Anjin also needs to be enormously fat. Otherwise they/them would be excluding us fat people, and we’d be offended.
@blas3266
@blas3266 13 днів тому
​@ilkinsuleymanzad8252 and people committing seppuku because they misgender someone
@guywithdacap4713
@guywithdacap4713 13 днів тому
@@ilkinsuleymanzad8252 It´s 2024, dude. Why is live and let live such a big problem for guys like you? Don´t make your social anxiety a problem of everybody else. Accept that other people have different characteristics and the right to express them like you do and everything is fine. Life is to short to get angry about stuff that you can´t change. 10 people 11 styles of life. Live and let live. Easy!
@sentaifavel
@sentaifavel 16 днів тому
His name wasn't shortened to Yabu for the 80's miniseries....that's his name in the book.
@MilkoInsano
@MilkoInsano 15 днів тому
yeah it's kinda hard to compare 2 things without reading the source material, you don't know which is doing things the correct way and which one is making the changes
@lucyshnyr5647
@lucyshnyr5647 15 днів тому
Yessss! Finalmente. Also Nagakado is just Naga in the book, doesn’t die and is a most unpleasant young man to me. The episode with Jozen was … arghh
@jp16k92
@jp16k92 15 днів тому
@@lucyshnyr5647 and "Ajiro" was "Anjiro"
@AliAiham
@AliAiham 13 днів тому
Yabushige!!!
@szepi79
@szepi79 11 днів тому
@@MilkoInsano yeah, with analysis like this, you need to: 1. be aware of what really happened (and that is already a huge task by itself, since we interpret historical figures differently than we used to 40 years ago) 2. read the book, that was based on the real events, and keep in mind the "creative differences" towards reality 3. watch the 80s show, and keep in mind the differences toward 1 & 2 4. watch the 2024 show, and not lose your mind with everything going on :D
@felixseagal4954
@felixseagal4954 14 днів тому
1980s series has more colors - the sunlight, nature, dresses. Everything was in full color. 2024 version has this blue filter and lots of scenes are in the dark. I also think Toshiro Mifune's face who played shogun in the original version better translates ruthlessness of Toranaga. Mifune is a legend who played in almost 200 movies and series. He is a standard of how to depict samurai.
@Songbirdstress
@Songbirdstress 11 днів тому
The Japanese actors are incredible in 80s version. The guy who is forced to commit seppuko in the pit hits it out of the park.
@rocketsjudoka
@rocketsjudoka 2 дні тому
That's the biggest change I noticed too even in the previews that the color palette of the 2024 version is very dark while the 80's version is much brighter. So both the look and the feel of the two versions are much different with the 1980 version more of an adventure romance story will the 2024 more of a political intrigue.
@michaelnorthcutt7628
@michaelnorthcutt7628 16 днів тому
It might be a good idea to read the book or listen to the audiobook. It's a very good book.
@AliAiham
@AliAiham 13 днів тому
Would it be okay if I listened to the audiobook considering I have trouble reading at all let alone a book of that depth size and magnitude?,
@michaelnorthcutt7628
@michaelnorthcutt7628 13 днів тому
@@AliAiham honestly I listened to it the first time on audible and it kept me hooked. I'm listening to it again right now.
@mikep760
@mikep760 9 днів тому
Yes it is.. I've read the book a couple times and have listened to the audiobook a few times.
@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady
@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady 15 днів тому
The 1980 version was much closer to the original book by James Clavell. The romance with Blackthorne and Mariko was a key part of both the book and the 1980 version. The new version does not really play that up too much. Also the new version, concentrates on Blackthorne losing and loyalty to Toranaga . That never happened in the 1980 version or the book. I liked the book the best and the 1980s version better than the current version but I’m still happy. They remade it in modern times.
@gretchenmiller3639
@gretchenmiller3639 15 днів тому
Totally agree!
@Cryptonymicus
@Cryptonymicus 12 днів тому
Shogun 2024 is a typically mediocre production with very nice effects.
@57palmtree
@57palmtree 11 днів тому
100% agree. In the 2024 version the sun never shined. Each day scene was mostly overcast or foggy. The characters were mostly violent, ignorant, or manipulative.
@artm1973
@artm1973 6 днів тому
@@57palmtree That's because the 2024 version was filmed in British Columbia, where it's always raining, while the 1980 version was filmed in Japan.
@57palmtree
@57palmtree 6 днів тому
@@artm1973 Humph!
@bani_niba
@bani_niba 15 днів тому
It's quite the surprise to me that the 1980's version is truer to the book. The 2024 version makes more historical sense though.
@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady
@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady 15 днів тому
But the point is the book is a novel. Not a non fiction book.
@colingoldie9173
@colingoldie9173 13 днів тому
Explain please.
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
@@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady well not really. The current version is BASED on the book. There were cultural mistakes and a very Westernised perspective. The Japanese characters were often extremely 2 dimensional. I've been saying for years that a remake was due. It would have been an awful waste to stick to Clavel's interpretation of 16th C Japanese culture. Background music aside, I really liked the '80s version, as well as the book. But this new version is a much better representation of the culture at that period (as far as I can tell).
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
@@colingoldie9173 Clavell developed a deep interest in Japan and the wider Asian world while a prisoner of war and from reading after that. He never was a historian in the modern sense and never claimed to be. He therefor made the central character an Englishman like himself acclimatising to Japanese culture. The events that he alludes to happened but aspects of the culture are necessarily missing. In this later version you only have to look at the credits to see how much they have tried to get everything right. There are advisors on clothing, kimono gesture, social contract, just about all aspects of 16th C Japanese culture are covered by experts in the field. Clavell's daughter spent two years in research before even starting to write. Consider also that the story is now how Toronaga uses Mariko and Blackthorne to win him Shogunship. We have the benefit of subtitles so we see how Mariko almost always mistranslates to achieve her Lord's wishes (I noticed also that she translates literally in her mediation between the paid courtesan Kiko, and Blackthorn. I put this to one side to contemplate later, but is she putting herself in Kiko's place for their encounter later? Maybe she uses Kiko's skillful description of the Japanese art of lovemaking so he understands it clearly.). The original book was groundbreaking and deserves its place as a masterpiece. You only really get at the subtleties if you reread and reread it. Most of that was missing in the original series, but jumps out in the later version.
@castlerock58
@castlerock58 8 днів тому
@@davebox588 Remakes are almost never as good as the original. This was no exception. The acting was not as good.
@hblanche
@hblanche 15 днів тому
I'm someone who is old enough to have read the novel when it was a bestseller and saw the first miniseries when it actually aired. Both versions have their strengths and weaknesses but yes, the first one was more faithful to the novel. And perhaps most importantly to me, even though I appreciated the latter series, the first one was just more fun and entertaining. And the soundtrack by Maurice Jarre was bombastic and memorable, while the new soundtrack sounded synthetic and boring.
@grandmufftwerkin9037
@grandmufftwerkin9037 15 днів тому
Both the 1980 series and the 2024 series share the same problem; time, or the lack thereof. Clavell's story needs more episodes than what it's given.
@khal7702
@khal7702 15 днів тому
it really didn't mini series is good as it is, there was no downtime in the 24 Shogun, it had u engaged whole time
@markuskampmann2053
@markuskampmann2053 15 днів тому
Totally agree in terms of time. That's a huge problem. Personally I would have liked that they would tell the Story of the Tokugawa Ieyasu, then we would have material for several seasons. 😍 The "Shogun" story is just too short.
@Cryptonymicus
@Cryptonymicus 12 днів тому
@@khal7702 Shogun 2024 didn't have me engaged the whole time because really I didn't find any of the characters to be at all appealing.
@Rudero3
@Rudero3 12 днів тому
I agree, it should have been at least 15 episodes, that ending is just so fast.
@Smithcraft1
@Smithcraft1 11 днів тому
They had time in the modern one, but they wasted it on adding fluff.
@gdkopinionator4356
@gdkopinionator4356 16 днів тому
Nagakado is in the 1980 version. He is simply known as Lord Naga, and is an aide to his father. When Blackthorne first meets him, Naga is somewhat stiff and unpleasant (Anjin calls him "an unpleasant little bugger"). When Anjin is made hatamoto, then given a fief/lordship, their relationship warms. In fact, Naga takes part in the ceremony where Anjin is given his fief. In the 1980 version, Omi's relationship to Anjin is complicated. Despite the fact that they, very much, start on the wrong foot, it is clear that Omi finds value in Anjin. He prevents Anjin from committing suicide, and begrudgingly accepts Anjin as a fellow samurai/lord. Toranaga intentionally gives Anjin the contract for Omi's lover, knowing that Anjin would give the contract over to Omi. It is hinted that this bonded the two characters forever, which was Toranaga's intent. His most important vassal, and his most important admiral will have each others backs from then on.
@kansairobot2015
@kansairobot2015 15 днів тому
exactly!
@jamesdunn1935
@jamesdunn1935 15 днів тому
Not sure if it was mistakes or he merely chose to omit them from his story. What I found interesting is the immense contrast in the interpretations both these movies illustrate from the same book.
@zooks527
@zooks527 10 днів тому
In the book, Omi accepts that he can never have Kiku and rides off, finding himself freed from his obsession with her and open to wider horizons. Quoting from the book: "I bless Toranaga for releasing me from servitude. Now nothing binds me. Neither father nor mother nor Kiku. Now I can be patient too. I'm twenty-one, I'm almost daimyo of Izu, and I've a world to conquer."
@AnonymousGamer546
@AnonymousGamer546 8 днів тому
We know that William Adams (John Blackthorns real life counter part) became trusted advisor to Tokugawa Ieyasu (the real life counterpart of Yoshi Torenaga) on all things outside of Japan. Adam’s also supervised the construction of several European style ships in Japan for Ieyasu.
@gdkopinionator4356
@gdkopinionator4356 8 днів тому
@@AnonymousGamer546 Indeed. There also was another European gentleman who also became samurai and hatamoto under Ieyasu. The 2024 series specifically states that Toranaga is the regent charged w/ foreign policy leadership. I wonder how Ieyasu reacted to learning the entire text of the Saragosa Treaty? 200 years of Tokugawa rule would tend to indicate that they managed the situation closely.
@frankfitzpatrick7279
@frankfitzpatrick7279 15 днів тому
I think that before you compare or criticise the 1980's production then first read the book.The 1980's version is so close to the book.He learns simple Japanese words while in the prison and while you laugh that he danced for Lord Toranaga and also acted the fool in order to stop Lord Ishido searching the caravan procession leaving Ishido's Castle (containing Toranaga disguised as a woman) all these elements are contained in the book.So as good as the 2024 series is,it lacks the true feel of the book.Almost every important event and character in the book is in the 1980's version.
@chrisr1733
@chrisr1733 4 дні тому
Totally agree. When I saw the first trailer for the new version and saw that Mariko is now some kind of killer samurai warrior, I realized it would be a joke. The book (and all of Clavell's books) is excellent, and the 1980 film version respected that.
@MurdochGuitar
@MurdochGuitar 16 днів тому
Orange on the Priests is explained in the book. They wear Orange to match the Orange robes of Buddhist monks. They were approprating the religious wear of the Japanese
@steveyi2859
@steveyi2859 11 днів тому
Should have used orange
@coltfan1726
@coltfan1726 9 днів тому
@@steveyi2859 No they shouldn't. It was explained in the book, but the book was wrong. Or off anyway. They did use orange early one, but switched back to black by 1600
@timizero
@timizero 9 днів тому
Japanese Monks don't usually wear orange, but mostly black unlike Chinese and Thais.
@cbspock1701
@cbspock1701 15 днів тому
The original was actually shot in Japan, the new one is very dark and at times looks like it was shot on a soundstage with the volume
@Fred_L.
@Fred_L. 13 днів тому
The new one was mostly filmed in Canada.
@DeeDiamond2981
@DeeDiamond2981 13 днів тому
They used the scenery...of Canada...
@SCharlesDennicon
@SCharlesDennicon 12 днів тому
Nah, the places they picked in Canada were perfect, they can serve as Japan. You say it looks "very dark"... have you been to Japan? I've been to Nagoya, a few years ago... the countryside can be preeeetty dark.
@lsamoa
@lsamoa 12 днів тому
@@SCharlesDennicon lol, what a strange thing to say. Japan isn't darker than other places. It's not Greenland/Alaska/Iceland.
@seanmurray8439
@seanmurray8439 12 днів тому
Vancouver shoot apparently
@MilkoInsano
@MilkoInsano 15 днів тому
the 1980's version is definitely much more of a fun watch, the characters get to have happy moments in that version. the modern one is very gritty and cinematic with much more depth to the characters
@Yamigata
@Yamigata 15 днів тому
Yabu's name was not shortened in the 80s show. It was lengthened in the newer show. His name was Yabu in the novel.
@williamquintana1668
@williamquintana1668 13 днів тому
The 1980 version was closer to the book, the story was centered on Blackthorne, as it was on the book. The 2024 version was adapted to be more Japanese centered. It makes sense to me, since Toranaga on the 2024 is portrayed by Hiroyuki Sanada, thus as a Japanese, he decided to flesh out the Japanese characters more and changes that he felt were closer to the true story of Tokugawa Ieyasu, the real man who united Japan. I like them both. The 2024 cut significantly the interaction between Blackthorne and his crew, as well with Father Alvito and Vasco Rodrigues, there were nice ancillary stories both on the book and the 80's series, and gave more importance to the Black Ship (which did exist). And indeed on the book the character was called Kasigi Yabu, not Kashigi Yabushide. In the 80's version and the book the love story between Mariko and Blackthorne is developed further and both Buntaro and Toranaga suspected about it, a fact confirmed when Mariko bequeath the money for Blackthorne to build a new ship. In the end, artists can adapt source materials according to their sensibilities, the 80's version was American produced, the 2024 version have Japanese producers, more familiar with the real story of the Sengoku period than many western audiences, thus, having the series seen more through the Japanese point of view was interesting and refreshing to me. It would have made no sense whatsoever to recreate the 80's series frame by frame on the 2024 version with new actors.
@atomictao
@atomictao 3 дні тому
Well said. The source material is rich enough for multiple interpretations.
@ellblake
@ellblake 15 днів тому
Well they didn’t “omit” the backstory with Ochiba and Mariko. It was invented for the ‘24 version since they decided to elevate Mariko’s character and make Blackthorne a supporting character in his own story
@einezcrespo2107
@einezcrespo2107 15 днів тому
Agreed. What both versions didn't do was Ochiba's "disdain," for Toranaga because she was afraid he may have seen her pillowing a peasant who looked like The Taiko. She wanted to sire the son he wanted after the death of his first born. In truth Ochiba secretly desired Toranaga. Mariko never had a friendship back story with Ochiba nor were they acrimonious. In fact Ochiba was only slightly jealous of Mariko's talent as a poetess.
@kansairobot2015
@kansairobot2015 15 днів тому
Perhaps, I dont remember very well, but what they did omit was that Mariko was the daugher of Akechi Jinsai, which IS in the book
@hueyslick291
@hueyslick291 14 днів тому
I watched the 1980’s version after reading the book and again before I watched the current one. The biggest difference was the 1980’s was much more a love story with the current one more of a subtle inspection of the Japanese culture.
@ellblake
@ellblake 14 днів тому
@@hueyslick291 Yeah, they definitely cranked up the romance for the '80 version. I think they turned it down so much for the '24 version that it almost doesn't make sense for Blackthorne to react as he does to her death.
@Fred_L.
@Fred_L. 13 днів тому
They also changed the relationships. While the 24 version makes Kuroda (who was killed by Mariko's father) the father of Ochiba the historical Kuroda, being Oda Nobunaga, was not (if I remember correctly he was an uncle).
@HarfangX
@HarfangX 15 днів тому
The 80s Shogun has been a yearly watch for me for many years. I've never read the book but I always knew that the 80s adaptation was focussed on Blackthorne and less so with the politics of Torenaga... Obviously I was already very fond of that version. I welcome the 2024 version for giving me all the context I was missing in the 80s version. It's hard to choose between both series as they both give you something very unique... For one, the 2024 version is filmed in British Columbia and unfortunatly... I feel like I can tell... where as the 80s version shows you actual japanese castles and countryside. The 80s version is very streamlined as well as the complexities of the politics are not very present... and having a narrator does help to highlight important information. I like both but the 80s version will always have a special place in my heart... I hope one day it is remastered.
@Cryptonymicus
@Cryptonymicus 12 днів тому
Frankly, I don't know why Blackthorn is in Shogun 2024. He doesn't seem to serve any purpose in Shogun 2024 unless you also know what he's done in Shogun 1980. A great deal of Shogun 2024 seems to rely on knowing Shogun 1980.
@trickydicky8488
@trickydicky8488 12 днів тому
@@Cryptonymicus And I thought he was a complete dick in the 2024 version.
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
@@Cryptonymicus I don't see how you can say that when it's being lauded by people who have never seen the '80s version. '80s Blackthorn follows a very well trodden "hero" narrative (Man Called Horse", "Dances with Wolves" etc). A character foreign to a culture who goes through true hardship, a harsh trial of character, before ascending to the highest levels of that society. This later Blackthorn is less of that. He starts out brash and acquisitive before learning a series of lessons and becoming immersed in the culture. Notice the early Blackthorn speaking rapidly, often without thinking or the consequences of his actions. Then see his later self. Calmer, more measured. His journey leads us into an understand of the way Japanese culture worked, and in some ways works today.
@jdpc9391
@jdpc9391 22 години тому
They complet each other in showing more of the book, but the 80th version is way closer to it in it's story, structure and following Blackthorne.
@HarfangX
@HarfangX 22 години тому
@@jdpc9391 i agree they’re great counterparts… now that the 2024 series is done… I’m sad that there’s no more of it 😢 "Flowers are only flowers because they fall"
@johnsteed9083
@johnsteed9083 15 днів тому
Personally I thought Blackthorne's character in the 2024 version seemed much less significant than the 1980's where it was almost given centre stage. The scene in the 80's version where Blackthorne gives Kiku's contract to Omi was just fabulous. I would love to know what Omi says to him, but of course no subs. Presumably something along the lines of 'a debt I can never repay....'
@VValkyrie
@VValkyrie 13 днів тому
1980 Omi rocked! Both Yabu versions were excellent.
@ADAPTATION7
@ADAPTATION7 12 днів тому
Considering the guy pissed on Blackthorne's back, it was quite generous of him.
@artm1973
@artm1973 6 днів тому
In the book Blackthorne didn't give her to Omi, Toranaga had big plans for Kiku and Blackthorne.
@johnsteed9083
@johnsteed9083 6 днів тому
@@artm1973 It's been so long since I read the book, I didn't remember that. Thanks for the heads up.
@artm1973
@artm1973 6 днів тому
@@johnsteed9083 I thought it was a great moment in the miniseries though.
@littlewing7017
@littlewing7017 16 днів тому
I preferred the earlier version, as it was closer to the book. And Richard Chamberlain looked far more like the description of Blackthorne in the book. (Although Cosmo's voice was wonderful to listen to.) However, no miniseries, not even the 1980 version, could ever equal the vast pleasure of reading the book. (IMO, the difference between watching the miniseries and reading the book is like smelling the pizza baking in the oven, versus actually tasting it.) BTW, I appreciated your comparisons. You did a fine job!
@jp16k92
@jp16k92 15 днів тому
I’m with you there. The only thing I liked more in the 80s series than in the book is making Blackthorne blind instead of death after the explosion. That way, the burning of the ship with him slowly recovering sight is made more dramatic.
@littlewing7017
@littlewing7017 11 днів тому
@@jp16k92 Yes! Me too! Temporarily blinding the Anjin-san made so much more sense in getting the story across. People forget that "reading" a story is experienced in a different part of the brain than "watching" a story. (When I finished reading the book, I felt a little lost for a few days. I missed being in Japan and following all of his adventures.)
@clash5j
@clash5j 15 днів тому
It's too much for me to escape the nostalgia feels of the 1980 version. It just hit me at the perfect time in my life and I'll always love it. I did enjoy the 2024 a great deal though and it would still be up there among my favorite miniseries
@farvque
@farvque 15 днів тому
For it's time, the 1980 version is/was an epic and still reigns as one of the greatest series of all time IMO. The 1980 version followed the book religiously (with a few notable exceptions) while the 2024 version takes a lot of liberties with the story, but overall ends up in the same place. Since this is a work of fiction based on historical events, poetic license is acceptable in the re-telling while overall staying true to historical events. You can't compare the production values since technology has come so far in the intervening 44 years, but for it's time, the 1980 version was outstanding. Frankly I'm not so upset that the 2024 version wasn't a bespoke retelling of the 1980 version and had a uniqueness to the story and the characters that was different from the 1980 version. The main difference being the 1980 version told the story from Blackthorn's point of view, while the 2024 series told the story from the Japanese point of view. I'm a fan of both! To this day (I'm in my late 60's), Shogun is still one of the best books I've ever read as is most of Clavell's works. It's outstanding to watch this epic novel come to life using current technology.
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
So true. Fucking awful background music aside, the '80s version was a complete departure from most storytelling at the time. It misses most of the subtlety in the book, but still a good effort. In a nutshell, the '80s version is the story of Blackthorn helping Toronaga become Shogun. The '24 version is how Toronaga uses Blackthorn as one of his hawks to attain the same position. PS. that other Clavell film, Tai-Pan, needs remaking as well. The book is fascinating, while Australian Dan Brown affecting a Scottish accent for the film is laughable. Very little sense of place either.
@AghartaColony
@AghartaColony 11 днів тому
If I can say James Clavell's daughter was a part of the script in the show. It will be good if in that energy Michaela Clavell can make a series about King Rat, Tai Pan or Gai Jin like a continue to the saga... until then I really loved the new adaptation of Shogun even if with in compare the 80's version was just legendary. But yeah I really hope this TV show get more viewers and hopefully it will get the needed appreciation from the audience.
@cybele_mullejz
@cybele_mullejz 6 днів тому
I just watched the 80s version for the first time after watching the 2024 series, and was surprised by how much I enjoyed it (except for the music ,,,, ugh). I also just started reading the book. Each version offers something different to like. The 80s miniseries is told entirely from Blackthorne’s perspective and does a decent job portraying his transformation from an Englishman to Japanese samurai. Every time he faces what he thinks will be certain death - like following through on his threat of suicide because he didn’t want an entire village’s destruction on his conscience - it seems to be a pivotal moment for his character, with Mariko even telling him that he’s been “reborn” (I’ve not gotten that far in the book). What I like about the book so far is the amount of time given to the POVs of characters like Omi and Omi’s uncle, Yabu. I’m especially enjoying Yabu’s internal dialogue - despite his shady, sometimes cruel and sadistic behavior, there’s something about his POV that makes him a particularly engaging and fun character …a “glass is half full” kind of guy. And I can’t _not_ picture the 2024 actor who plays Yabu whenever he appears in the book. The same is true for the entire 2024 cast, and while I liked the 80s version of Blackthorne, I preferred Jarvis’s portrayal of him more than that of Richard Chamberlain, who I actually thought was miscast at times. I also appreciate the commitment to authenticity in the 2024 series, even down to how the extras would sit or carry themselves depending on the role & social status of their characters. As a weird aside, I was impressed by how the cast and extras, especially in the 80s version, were able to do all that repetitive kneeling on the ground, then rising, then kneeling, etc, in practically every scene, while also making it look graceful and effortless. As someone with a bad knee, I couldn’t help but cringe. Interestingly, in the 2024 version, there was less of that repetitive kneeling & rising, and more just sitting and staying on the ground, cross legged. One thing I didn’t like - Mariko’s ultimate fate. But I get why it had to be that way for the story’s conclusion to work.
@davebox588
@davebox588 5 днів тому
@@cybele_mullejz Great observations IMO, and I agree. The book tells a lot more about each major character's inner thoughts and motivations, and I believe the '24 version is better at revealing those. Also you'll recall how right at the beginning of that later version that Toronaga is out hawking and describes how his hawk (presumably a peregrine) comes out of the Sun so the prey doesn't know it's there until it strikes. That's a perfect metaphor for Mariko, who is polite, subservant and contained until the moment she appears out of nowhere and her actions result in the disintegration of the Council of Regents who up to that point had been in broad agreement. In the book and '24 version it's clear that Mariko dies by her own actions (voluntarily standing in front of the door) and thus suffers a samurai death. That event is not so clear in the '80s version where it appears almost an accident that she's there. Not dissing the '80s version at all. I have watched it countless times over the years, but it was a series of its time and it would have been disappointing if the latest version hadn't done a better job.
@ohauss
@ohauss 15 днів тому
No, the new ending doesn't say that war is averted, it says that Toranaga has a chance at winning at Sekigahara, because the Heir's troops will not join the battle. Toranaga says five armies WILL meet at Sekigahara, but Lady Ochiba will make sure the Heir's army will not support Ishido there. He also says that this will cause the other leaders to turn against Ishido. Buthat will only happen there, on the battlefield, so that Ishido will have no chance to do something about it. This mirrors Yodo-dono not deploying Hideyori's troops and thus not formally supporting Ishida, leading to him having a shaky authority and several daimyos switching sides over the course of the Battle of Sekigahara.
@gunsort3242
@gunsort3242 15 днів тому
I suppose that I'll never get the version of Shogun that I have always wanted. The 80s version was very close to the novel. It focused more on the Anjin/Mariko relationship and omitted most of the intrigue with the Japanese characters. The producers of the 80s version didn't think that the audience would be interested enough or that there would be budget enough to make a 22 hour miniseries. Which is what they figured would be the length of the story if they did the entire novel. In the book, Yabu was Yabu. Not Yabushige. The cannon scene didn't happen. Toranaga's son didn't die. Lady Ochiba and Mariko did not have a childhood back story. Yedo stood in for Edo, and Anjiro was not Ajiro. While the new version was interesting, I felt that the Blackthorne character was made to be kind of goofy and did not adapt well to his situation as he did in the novel. Of course, the new adaptation is really only loosely connected to the novel. It is quite a different story in many ways which is fine as many films take liberties with original material. The producers of the 80s version had to stick closely to the novel as it had only been five years since it's release and it had huge popularity. My ideal version of Shogun would be the 22 hour epic that will never be made. I guess it's time to read the book again.
@stephenderry9488
@stephenderry9488 14 днів тому
Nothing goofy about Richard Chamberlain's dancing, of course.
@gunsort3242
@gunsort3242 13 днів тому
Sake, neh?
@sir-ok9gd
@sir-ok9gd 12 днів тому
@@stephenderry9488 Also an Englishman with an American accent...
@stallion78
@stallion78 12 днів тому
@@sir-ok9gdwell their first choice was Sean Connery, he was interested but wouldn’t do regular television
@talisa222
@talisa222 10 днів тому
@@sir-ok9gdWell they were all speaking Portuguese so what does that matter
@gyakuto7775
@gyakuto7775 15 днів тому
Thank you for this informative comparison video. The 80s version had an edge of ‘mysterious Japan’; it was back when we (especially those of us involved in Japanese martial arts) were fascinated by that aspect. The modern version rightly assumes the audience knows a little more Japanese culture and treats us accordingly. The inclusion of classical Japanese language was a brilliant idea and had me reaching for my dusty classical Japanese language book. The one thing I struggled with was the dark, grey, wet appearance to the modern version. It was gloomy, dour and I found it oppressive. It seems to be ubiquitous and fashionable in modern filming. This will date Shōgun 24 for future viewers just as the over saturated colours of 80s Shōgun helps to date it (and those even earlier ‘green tinted 60s films’). Both versions have their charms, the 80s version has a few cringey moments too. I liked the visual warmth of the original and the cultural authenticity of the new version. I look forward to the Blu-Ray of Shōgun ‘24 coming out with all it’s extras and will likely be watching that more than the original.
@AghartaColony
@AghartaColony 15 днів тому
If you read the book you will see that the movie from the 80s is hundred % more accurate to the book. That's why I really appreciate the one from the 80s more but I do appreciate the new one as well. But if I have to chose 1, the one from the 80s is much better because actually almost the whole story is focused on Blackthorn and Mariko not like the new adaptation in Ishido, Lady Ochiba and Toranaga. And that's how it is in the book as well. Oh and also I really don't understand how in the 80's they did the job and for 9 hours they putted the whole story better and even some small details was fact even with the long music scenes typical for the 80's period. And in the new one they missed so much of the details about the story... I appreciate the details about the costumes and the Japanese culture but like they missed the details about the actual story... Like example I really missed the story about Kiku in the last when Toranaga give her like consort to Blackthorn and he give his documents to Omi...and actually if you do the math 10x60 mins is even more time than the previous one... but like every episode almost 2-3 mins are only for script... :D and okay I appreciate Hiruyuki Sanada version but he put too much time in the episodes about the actual Japanese culture like food scenes etc. instead of some details that was very important from the actual story from the book... what a waste...that's why the one from the 80's is much much better... But still for 2024 the new one is 10/10 for me.
@victortonelli5670
@victortonelli5670 10 днів тому
They turned into a feminist story. It's boring.
@zamlat8118
@zamlat8118 2 дні тому
They kept some scenes from the book but rushed them to the point of completelly missing their significance. Like Omi pissing on Blacthorne - in the book Blacthorne submits to humiliation to save his men, in 2024 he is physically subdued.
@katherine.benson4489
@katherine.benson4489 16 днів тому
The 1980 version adheres more closely to Clavell's book which I like because I have read the book many times. The Anjin san seppuku scene is very significant and occurs early on, because it happens when Anjin finally realizes that he must think and act Japanese if he is going to survive. In the 1980 version, Yabu, Omi and Mariko give his effort great seriousness which it merits. The 1980 version shows the character development of Anjin into living like a Japanese early on whereas the 2024 version continues to portray Blackthorne as sort of a bumbling white guy throughout until the last episode. Also, in the 1980 version the love story of Anjin and Mariko is given much more time and development with Mariko instructing Anjin in Buddhist philosophy and Japanese culture. The 2024 version is riveting in its portrayal of Japanese culture. However, as I like the book so much, the many small changes to Clavell's story are a little annoying to me. I wish the 2024 version had done two seasons and given the details of Blackthorne's character development and the love story more time.
@khylaldana2757
@khylaldana2757 15 днів тому
I havent read the book yet, so I was watching the 2024 series sort of like it was a standalone thing. Caring not about the show’s fidelity with the book but rather its narrative quality, I think Blackthorn committing seppuku at such an early stage of his development would not have made sense. The ultimate end-point of his development was to embrace Japanese culture, because he will never be going back to England. Blackthorn throughout the show demonstrated slow integration, starting off with the little things like minding his cleanliness and starting to adhere to Japanese rituals and practices. Then he started to understand the deeper culture of the Japanese people, why they’re so detail-minded and distant. Then he started to speak the language… idk where you saw him being just a “bumbling white dude”. Though luck was on his side, he still had to do a lot of things that took a lot of grit, tenacity, insight and some cunning to maneuver his way thru Japan’s weird bureaucracy, assimilation being one of them. But Sepuku has always been at the extreme end of Japanese culture, and at the beginning Blackthorn could not even accept that he may die in Japanese lands. It makes sense that only when Blackthorn is finally able to accept his fate in the Japans, he was willing to sacrifice his life for the village and die in a country that he once vowed to leave. It makes less sense if he was willing to do that mid-show, when he’s just barely able to understand why japanese people were so very willing to take their own lives away.
@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady
@MarkFisherandJanisGillhamGrady 15 днів тому
I agree with you completely. Blackthorn was almost an afterthought in this new version.
@katherine.benson4489
@katherine.benson4489 15 днів тому
@@khylaldana2757 , if you read the book, you will understand that the changes in Blackthorne took place over the first 6 months as he was learning the language and the way of life around him.
@AghartaColony
@AghartaColony 15 днів тому
I agree 100000%
@lucyshnyr5647
@lucyshnyr5647 15 днів тому
Yes, yes and yes. A brilliant comment!
@Peekingduck
@Peekingduck 15 днів тому
For all its claims to be more authentic, the new version sure misses on several points. Why is it raining and dusk throughout the 2024 version? Why is the lady Toda's Naginata training in sgi? Why, if you are going to use computer graphics, don't you use them to make the landscape look less Nordic (Vikings)? Why are all the castle walls Uchi-Komi hagi, which were mostly use later in the Edo era? Why is the blade that Blackthorn is given by lady Fuji(ko) so obviously a bad tourist/souvenir sword, like those you can buy in Asakusa? Why do some of the zori used in the 2024 version have a rubber surface?
@patrickrada2923
@patrickrada2923 7 днів тому
Why are you asking these questions under the video of some fan of the series who can hardly answer your questions instead of asking them to the producers or their public relations department?
@ksjazzguitaryt
@ksjazzguitaryt 13 днів тому
I'm only halfway through the 2024 one. I loved the 1980 and loved the book. So far, I miss the inner politics of the Japanese Catholic priests. I miss a little of the romance. I think Mariko's character is too cold and bitter - she doesn't hid her feelings at all. I miss the interesting and complex relationship between Omi and Anjin and how hit evolves. The scene with the "unless I win" line I thought was much better in 1980 - it was about rebelling against your liege lord, a much more subtle question, steeped in honor and honesty and a question that is weighing heavily on Toranaga's as he contemplates treason and is surrounded my betrayal. Anjin responds to the accusation of rebellion that there were mitigating circumstances. Toranaga says there are never mitigating circumstances in rebellion. Anjin wryly smiles and replies, "unless you win", capturing Toranaga's heart. That is so much more rich than 2024's "why fight a battle hopeless battle". I also missed the extended conversations about the pheasant with Fuji, and the aftermath of the execution. I also think that Anjin's and Rodrigues' relationship is a lot more fun and developed in 1980. I thought the "would you prefer a boy" scene in 1980 was a lot better - it showed the cultural differences a lot. (Though even there, I missed the conversation about a "duck" from the book - too funny.) What I like of 2024? It is less campy. In 1980, I thought the lack of subtitles allowed us to feel Anjin's isolation, but having them in 2024 allows us to get more of the story from the Japanese perspective. I like that they've given the female characters more depth. I like that they've cut out some of the suicide (in the book, it seems like every other page someone was committing suicide - OK, author, we get the point). I like that they've moved a little focus from Anjin - he's not the solver of every problem. I miss the almost regal bearing of Richard Chamberlin - but maybe that's a good thing as it gets us away from the "white man comes and becomes the best of them" trope. I don't know, watch them both. And then read the book - it's great.
@rsuriyop
@rsuriyop 15 днів тому
They diminished Omi sooo much in the 2024 version. This incarnation of Omi shows him as looking a little younger, a little smaller, and a lot less authoritative and intimidating as the 80s version of the same character.
@Fred_L.
@Fred_L. 13 днів тому
Meanwhile his machinattions and own troubles are shown much better. Just wish they would have left him getting Kiku's contract from Blackthorne.
@rsuriyop
@rsuriyop 13 днів тому
@@Fred_L. I suppose so. But the casting direction is still an odd one. After all, he is supposed to be like some sort of head samurai. To be kind of puny is a bit belittling considering his position of authority.
@TheGordyb102
@TheGordyb102 15 днів тому
Read all his books, 80 version closer to book however Iike the changes in today s depiction. Shogun is a great love story and culture story, Muriko is the true Samurai in both renditions
@russelltimmerman3771
@russelltimmerman3771 15 днів тому
10:28Tominaga is behind the burning in both versions. He admits this in 2024 when he seconds Yabu's seppuku.
@atticstattic
@atticstattic 15 днів тому
The difference being that in the new version, he _allows_ it rather than being the originator of the idea.
@talisa222
@talisa222 10 днів тому
@@atticstattic Isn't it implied that he was the one who did it in the 2024 version as well?
@atticstattic
@atticstattic 10 днів тому
@@talisa222 No, I think Mariko's deal with the Catholics for Blackthorne's life fit into his plans, so he allowed it to happen.
@Schunn
@Schunn 15 днів тому
Personally, I prefer the 1980s version (granted I did watch it first). I don’t want to dismiss the achievements of the modern adaptation, I think it’s great that we get to see the Japanese characters’ side of the story that we didn’t get to see in the original, but I think they diminished the European characters too much. In a perfect world all the factions would get equal screen time. Plus, I’m at a point in my life where I’m tired of dark, bleak movies and TV shows, I see it everywhere-I miss the levity and bombastic nature of older cinema.
@vishaansingh1019
@vishaansingh1019 15 днів тому
The 1980s miniseries was actually unsuccessful in Japan because audiences found it too dark and grotesque (with elements of condescension towards their culture.) But yes, I get what you mean (although at age 25, I'll admit I have more stomach for darkness, I just want it to be in service of something besides "Game of Thrones did it!") But 2024 makes a lot of changes for the negative- why change Blackthorne meeting his old crew and realizing he's on a different path to "Blackthorne beats up his drunk friend in an alley fight"?
@NukeMarine
@NukeMarine 15 днів тому
In the mini-series, Blackthorn's men warmly receive him when they meet again, though he's disgusted by them (only shown when he takes off his kimono afterwards and demands it be burned as it's bug infested). However, they do join him help fix the Erasmus before he heads to Osaka again (iirc).
@Cryptonymicus
@Cryptonymicus 12 днів тому
Why Blackthorn's crew is in Shogun 2024 remains a mystery to me. You could cut them out and who would notice?
@fencer5411
@fencer5411 14 днів тому
Two huge differences come to mind for me. The 1980s version seems to always be shot in bright light, whereas the modern version makes much more use of darkness and shadows. Also, in the 1980s version, everyone looks relatively clean, whereas in the modern version the characters look more realistic, covered at times with sweat, blood, and dirt.
@57palmtree
@57palmtree 12 днів тому
The '80s version was stunning! More pageantry, more character development, more historical context with respect to the geopolitics of the 1600s. The quality of the characters was levels higher. John Rhys-Davies as Vasco Rodriquez stole every scene he was in, the guy how played Father Alvito, had more screen presence and dignity. And, Toshiro Mifune as Lord Toranaga is priceless. The 2024 version was dark and brooding. The courtesans in the 2024 version were depicted as scrawny, scheming, manipulating females one level above rats. While in the book and 80's versions there shown as cultured beautiful women with intelligence. Kiko even rushes to Omi's wife when she arrives home to tell her what has transpired and to assure her Omi is well. The 2024 version is definitely a step down from the book and '80s miniseries.
@lsamoa
@lsamoa 12 днів тому
Sweat and dirt doesn't necessarily make it more realistic. Cleanliness was a big deal back then. The notion that people didn't really wash in the past is a bit of a myth. Sure, the French didn't (jk), but other people surely did.
@globalist1990
@globalist1990 11 днів тому
@@lsamoasome people think you can only clean yourself with a shower. No showers then: dirty stinky people. Also no washing machines...
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
@@lsamoa Blackthorne's crisp white shirt seemed to defy physics even after being kept in a stinking pit for days. As to washing, both both the '80s and '24 Blackthorns complain about washing twice in a week for fear of the flux. Let's be clear, initially even by rough camping standards, Blackthorn would have stunk.
@timizero
@timizero 9 днів тому
The funny things about 24 version is that they purposely choose to do things either early in the morning, late afternoon, at sunset, or at night...which did not make sense. I assume people in the past would utilize daylight as much as they could....like who the hell would do seppuku at sunset? That would be tedious to do the cleaning later.
@sandirawrmore6776
@sandirawrmore6776 15 днів тому
Really enjoying all the differences you found. Thank you for putting them all together. I enjoyed the small homages to the 80’s version, in the 2024. The drop of water on the leaf at the tea house in the 2024 version, mirrors Mariko’s tear in the 80’s version. Toranaga’s line about her being a bonfire, a callback to her funeral in the 80’s. Not sure if there were others.
@jp16k92
@jp16k92 15 днів тому
Look at Blackthorne's kimono in the new version. The colors are different but otherwise, it the same as the white and brown kimono worn by Chamberlain in the promo pics.
@mariapedroso6569
@mariapedroso6569 7 днів тому
Liked 80s better little of everything better understood 2024 too much talking dark n hard to follow but ok
@Nefylym
@Nefylym День тому
I watched the 80s version as a kid, and I remember my mother and brother and I being so struck by the marvelous story and culture, that a month later she presented us both with our very own daisho and did so during a small mini gempukku ceremony. I had those swords for years, but lost them to my great regret when we moved from Europe to America. They were only ceremonial, not battle-ready so tempered but not sharpened. I still remember the slide of the blade from the tsuba. A truly happy memory stirred by Chamberlain's and Mifune's wonderful performances. Domou Arigatou Gozai Masu, Tsepanji no Kuni.
@bobhill3941
@bobhill3941 12 днів тому
Thank you for the compare and contrast because I only recently heard that the 2024 Shogun which I watched (and loved) was a remake. I saw it advertised on Disney plus and thought it looked cool and decided to check it out and I wasn't disappointed..It also gave me something to watch on Tuesdays. I thought it was cool that Orson Welles narrated the original.
@Yamigata
@Yamigata 15 днів тому
"The same guy who played Gimli" has a name, you know. Good grief dude.
@patrickrada2923
@patrickrada2923 7 днів тому
Yes, the actor playing Rodriquez/Gimli is called John Rhys-Davies. However, I also had to google the name because I didn't remember it. Either the video creator no longer knew the name and was too lazy to google it, or he assumed that viewers wouldn't be able to relate to the actor's name, but they would be able to relate to the name of the dwarf from Lord of the Rings.
@lsamoa
@lsamoa 12 днів тому
I remember watching the older version as a kid. I liked the beautiful visuals, the story and acting were good etc, but I remember distinctively how uneasy I felt about how Japanese people were portrayed, like they were alien and strange. It was so obvious that even a kid like me noticed. Looking back, I think the lack of subtitles was a big mistake in that version. You just couldn't really get the Japanese character's motivations. I haven't seen the new version yet but apparently it brings more of the Japanese characters' perspectives into the story, so that's a good thing. I look forward to watching it, even if it looks like most of it was filmed at night. Better not be like that battle of Winterfell in the last season of GoT where I couldn't see a damn thing haha.
@tacitus7797
@tacitus7797 14 днів тому
Fun fact: when shogun was originally broadcast (yes, I saw it them) - there was no Orson Well's narration and one of the reason for no subtitles was expense (at least that is what TV Guide said). On a later rebroadcast - the narration was added.
@JeanSunny226
@JeanSunny226 11 днів тому
I remember this as well.
@CharlesECheese365
@CharlesECheese365 13 днів тому
Thank you! Awesome recap and comparison
@gretchenmiller3639
@gretchenmiller3639 15 днів тому
The 1980's version followed the book much closer. Not sure how this reviewer missed that Toranaga destroyed Blackthorne's ship as he actually says it. Blackthorne thinks it was Mariko, but although she did manage to keep him alive, she did not burn the ship.
@robertjohnstone3706
@robertjohnstone3706 15 днів тому
I loved the book , Clavell changed it for the mini series focusing on Blackthorn, which i loved , but was of its time . The new series was brilliant as well , which one do I prefer The Book you can never make a show that has the intimate details of a book .
@davebox588
@davebox588 11 днів тому
Agreed. It would take a 22 episode series to cover the subtleties from the book. Maybe even two seasons to let the audience catch their breath.
@samlanganke1262
@samlanganke1262 16 днів тому
It's really a 70s version, produced right after the book became a bestseller after being published in 1975. It was only aired in 1980.
@zimvader25
@zimvader25 15 днів тому
Making it an 80s version… movies and shows are produced in different years all of the time, just because avatar 3 finished filming last year, it doesn’t mean anyone is going to claim it’s a 2023 movie. This series aired in 1980 making it an 80s version. Not that hard to comprehend.
@jimlamb7642
@jimlamb7642 9 днів тому
@@zimvader25 Well since you want to be pedantic about it 1980 is still in the 70's until it ends. The next decade does not start till 1981 just like the millennium was not until 2001. So @samlanganke1262 was right. The more you know. 🤓
@Grimskarr
@Grimskarr 16 днів тому
I would disagree that the battle didn't take place. I believe that although Ishido realizes he has been outmaneuvered from the message, like the daimyo of episode 7, he would still have fought even though the final result was already determined.
@willbrink
@willbrink 12 днів тому
Considering the time and that it was made for TV the 1980 version was quite good. I'd read the book several times before the series came out, and was not unhappy with the TV version overall. The modern version didn't focus on the romance aspect oddly.
@petar.dj98
@petar.dj98 16 днів тому
If I remember correctly, in real life priests wore black at first but were not taken seriously by locals so Francis Xavier had them wear orange like buddhist monks.
@mackvanover735
@mackvanover735 12 днів тому
I love both. I have fond memories of my parents watching the original when I was very small. As an adult I tracked the series down and watched the full series a couple times in the last 15 years thanks to finding it on the internet. The new series is great too. I am currently listening to the audiobook as well. You should do another video on the differences between the novel and the new series. I’d be interested in finding out which of the television series were more accurate to the book.
@TakaAmun
@TakaAmun 4 дні тому
Informative video, and triggers my nostalgia of watching the original so many years ago. Thank you for posting! 00:03 I rented that VHS box set from Blockbuster, maybe 27 or 28yrs ago. The booklet that came with it was the Glossary and Translation Guide to words and phrases from the show. I may be describing it poorly, as it was almost like a very rudimentary Learn Japanese book with the difference between uses of words, i.e. wakarimasu (I understand) and wakarimasen (I don't understand). When my then girlfriend (now wife) returned the set to Blockbuster, she didn't know the booklet was part of it she thought it was mine and she shelved it. I didn't find out until years later when I discovered it on the shelf (it was magazine thin) when we were packing for a move! By then Blockbuster was shut down, though it would not likely have been returned anyways - I mean, how do you? "Hi, X years ago I borrowed Shogun, but left this out. Oh, you don't still have VHS or Shogun...?" 🤷‍♂ I still have it, somewhere, but probably in the same box it was packed in as none of my old apartment books were unpacked at new house, they were stored.
@canundrumsixnine6830
@canundrumsixnine6830 13 днів тому
According to several people I spoke to, Portuguese priests wearing orange garments in the 1980 Mini-Series was explained in the novel. It was because the Japanese required this of them because priests in Japan wore orange.
@koroba01
@koroba01 10 днів тому
It should be noted that one of the biggest reasons there are so many differences is that the current treatment strays much more from the novel than the 1980 version, it would be interesting to marry this video with a comparison of both to the novel. The filming aspect difference is right on, the 1980 version has not-so-appropriate music and has the distinct feel of a TV mini-series, whereas the current version is much more cinematic. One glaring difference not mentioned (not related to the story) is that the previous version was filmed in Japan but the current one was filmed in Canada - so many trees in the village it seemed like everyone was camping out, I think that affected my opinion of the current series (I have been to Japan many times, the trees in the series are very different). For the record, I first read the book when it was released and since read it many times. I also watched the 1980 series when it came out and later bought the DVD set. The current version really hit the mark on showing the culture, sets, and costumes but the 1980 series came close. Blackthorn is shown in the current series as fairly rough and barbarian like and Mariko much more brooding and her lack of Japanese accented English did not feel right. The Portuguese presence in the current version strays far from the novel and the 1980 version, they are almost nonexistent.
@rgnyc
@rgnyc 9 днів тому
I remember watching the 1980s version of Shogun when it was new. It was amazing and the performances were stellar. The lack of subtitles was a brave decision and paid off - we're all in the dark with Blackthorne until he learns rudimentary Japanese. The 2024 version also has incredible performances, and I've read that the Japanese spoken in this version is closer to the Japanese from that period (the equivalent of Elizabethan English). Overall, I think the 2024 version has a more "realistic" feel to it and the cinematography is pure poetry. But I love them both.
@dexterquilang2247
@dexterquilang2247 15 днів тому
1980 Fuji pretty AF tho
@straywolf77
@straywolf77 14 днів тому
I think both series were a reflection of sorts of the times. Both are excellent and both remain true to the historical story brought to life in Clavell's book. Note - I watched the original story back in 1980 as a kid. Here I am now watching the new version at 50+. Time...does fly folks and we view things through different eyes.
@natebuffington
@natebuffington 15 днів тому
This was fun. I feel that Clavell wrote a great work of historical fiction essentially about the Tokugawa shogunate as understood through Western eyes. Regardless, I much prefer the 2024 version as it is more culturally accurate from a Japanese point of view and helps us to better learn about an interesting culture while we are entertained.
@chrislj2890
@chrislj2890 10 днів тому
I had read the novel by James Clavell before the '80s mini-series came out, and as I remember it the Richard Chamberlain version was pretty true to the novel. We waited for the whole 2024 version to finish so we could watch it in its entirety one episode per night, and will watch the last tomorrow night. This had been a bit confusing because of the plot departure but it has made it very entertaining and suspenseful. Both versions are of their times and I like them both.
@jeffwagner6123
@jeffwagner6123 15 днів тому
I vote for the original. I like the characters and story line better. The new Mariko, while attractive, is rather cold.
@Cryptonymicus
@Cryptonymicus 12 днів тому
Mariko 2024 strikes me as a modern woman with a chip on her shoulder and when the actress is speaking English she sounds like an American. Not very convincing.
@SCharlesDennicon
@SCharlesDennicon 12 днів тому
@@Cryptonymicus I enjoyed 2024 Mariko overall because the actress is gorgeous, talented, and the series is sensational, but the lack of Japanese accent when she speaks English is an issue for me too, as are her looks, because her beauty isn't stereotypically japanese. Unlike the actress who plays Fuji, for example. Boy I so wish we had more of her.
@sjb3460
@sjb3460 12 днів тому
yes, she does not have the warmth and emotion of the original Mariko. Thanks for the observation.
@cliffjones8809
@cliffjones8809 15 днів тому
The better question would be which version more closely matches the book. It seems you haven't read the book. It is an absolute certainty that the book is best, and actually contains much more material. It's also certain that no movie would fail to make some changes to the story, but hopefully not the important points. One thing about the book: there are a bunch of languages, Dutch, English, Spanish, Portuguese, Latin, Japanese, and maybe even a little Italian and Chinese. And the reader always knows what language is being spoken, and which characters speak that language. This is a very key plot point, and the 1980 version's biggest failing is that they left all this out. (Did you ever notice that most Nazi villains actually speak English, with maybe a German accent?)
@rebeccaboudreau7589
@rebeccaboudreau7589 13 днів тому
Read the book before the 80s show came out, loved that because it was better than anything representing Japan before. The 2024 version is a HUGE improvement in Japanese culture and storyline. Love, love, love the new one - it’s a classic already
@edwardmcallister5681
@edwardmcallister5681 13 днів тому
Having read the James Clavell novel, the two mini series weirdly combine elements of them both. I was glad of the subtitles though. I think Cosmo Jarvis' portayal of the Anjin was way better than Richard Chamberlain's version. I always wondered why the 1980's verson of the Anjin always looked like he was about to fly into a rage. Cosmo Jarvis' portrayal has more humanity and vulnerability about it. I though Anna Sawai was incredible as the Lady Mariko with a backbone of hardened steel and resolve, where Yoko Shimada's 1980's Mariko was more delicate and unsure. I also thought the casting of Fuji San was odd in both versions. Moeka Hoshi in the 2024 vesion and Hiromi Senno in the 1980's version were both beautiful, but the Fuji in the book wasn't beautiful at all. That said, these three leading women are all breathtakingly beautiful. I hope they do not film another series, James Clavell finished it with the reader never knowing the fate of John Blackthorn (Anjin), and it should stay like that. I was also glad that this was a mostly Japanese production with Japanese leads. For me though, the stars of both versions were the fantasic late Toshiro Mifune and the immensly talented Hiroyuki Sonada, both playing Toranaga.
@alexbanks7115
@alexbanks7115 4 дні тому
I saw the original first back in the 80’s. I was a child and much of it went over my head, however it definitely made an impression it introduced me to Japan and the Japanese culture and the samurai, as well as the ninja. It also made me really look forward to the remake. Which I enjoyed. As far as which is better I’m unsure. The first was lighter more fun. The most recent was darker sadder I also understand loss frustration and despair a lot more at this point in my life. So I would say the most recent version would be the one I would gravitate to watching more however but the first left me with happier memories if that makes sense.
@Mjw90803
@Mjw90803 8 днів тому
I learned much more about Japanese culture in the 2024 version. Like the importance of pouring of tea. How "Buntaro" prepares tea for Lady Mariko in a typical Japanese tea ceremony. It was emotional and unexpected. Even in the brothel, Blackthorne was told to give complements on the pouring of tea to the courtesan- almost like foreplay! How the women had to walk with their knees together. Unlike the 1980's version, Japanese input, direction and producers depicts the show with more accuracy! I read where the dialogue was written in English before being translated into old Japanese and then checked by historians to ensure it is period appropriate! The script was written with a few more twists and turns. For example, although women weren't given any power but I LOVED the implied power that Mariko and Ochiba were able to wield, inspite of this male dominated feudal system who were at war. But through poetry, demure glances the women found a way to achieve victory for Toronaga! I just liked the 2024 version SO much better!
@troublemethis17
@troublemethis17 16 днів тому
though the earlier version was melodramatic, it established the relationships and had a lot better chemistry btw most of the cast. what i appreciate about the newer version is a japanese pov, sets/costumes etc. anna played mariko well but lacked both chemistry and charisma of yoko shimada... but then you'd have had to watch the first one first for comparison. cosmo played blackthorne better as a scumbag pilot/ sailor but like the new mariko, lacked chemistry and the directors didn't establish relationships very well. toronaga/sinada was fine but lacked the gravitas of mifune. in contrast, i did like the casting of the bontaro, yabu, ochiba, and fuji better than the original. in fact, i thought the actresses that played ochiba or fuji could've been cast better as mariko.
@pariposo
@pariposo 11 днів тому
That's exactly what I thought. The actress Anna Sawai has a very cool, modern appearance, almost arrogant. Given her past, Mariko would to have a differently character, like women in feudal Japan in general. They tried to write a strong female role and didn't realize what the real strength of the Mariko from the book was. Yoko Shimeda portrayed this perfectly in the 1980 series. Gentle on the outside but tough on the inside. This gave the dialogs with Anjin interesting moments. For the role of Mariko, I would have preferred Fumi Nikaidô (Ochiba No Kata). Anna Sawai Anna Sawai with her bossy Style would have been the bette fit for the Role from Ochiba No Kata. However, I also wonder why I never saw her as a Japanese.
@shaundavenport621
@shaundavenport621 11 днів тому
You're totally right.I was eleven years old and managed to pick up rudimentary Japanese from the show.I found it a very easy language to get to grips with.Far easier than Spanish or French. Some people just take to certain languages. 😊
@johnwachter6369
@johnwachter6369 11 днів тому
I much preferred the 2024 version.....seems much more realistic. And I fell in love with Anna Sawai !!
@unferrc
@unferrc 11 днів тому
Nice synopsis. Never watched the 80's version but remember how it captivated many. Interesting how the old version is so bright and John is often portrayed with such a smile. I'll take the newer version.
@Jagent
@Jagent 15 днів тому
This is the first video that I have ever seen explain the 4:3 letterboxing of old media. As someone who is old enough to remember when VHS beat out Betamax, I think I hate this milestone of my life.
@Songbirdstress
@Songbirdstress 11 днів тому
What he didn't explain is that tv was 4:3 because that was cinema ratio...
@TheRocco96
@TheRocco96 15 днів тому
Other differences: the 1980 series was filmed in Japan, while the new show was filmed in Canada. In the 1980 series Rodriguez was the very outspoken, extravagant character. In the 2024 series they made Yabu the outspoken, extravagant character. This change didn't fit well, it made Yabu a goofy, dumb character instead of an evil traitor.
@stallion78
@stallion78 12 днів тому
Both were amazing. I felt the 80s was truer to Japanese mannerisms as well. Father Alvito in the 80s version had commanding presence. And I must say the women were hotter in the 80s version. But i do appreciate the story twist in modern version. Because I never felt like Toronaga was in much danger in original version. Where as I didn’t feel like Blackthorn was in much danger in modern one…or I didn’t care much because his personality sucked
@sophmore90
@sophmore90 15 днів тому
In the 80s version I felt had a more "white savior" mentality I guess because it was closer to the source material. The modern version, because of its much larger Japanese producer, cast, and crew influence, made some cultural corrections bringing it closer to how it would really have been. In the modern version, Blackthorn was more a side character while in the 80s, he was the lens by which the audience navigated through the world of the Sengoku Jidai. In other words the European-centric perspective.
@metjetfan23
@metjetfan23 11 днів тому
I’m old, so watch the 80s version first, and it’s my preferred version. They added more narration on the 2nd showing of the mini series. They also made a movie for Europe that shrunk it down to 2ish hours. 😮
@TheMotomuras
@TheMotomuras День тому
Shogun is one of my favorite novels. I’ve read it at least 3 times. The love story is the emotional core of the book. While I enjoyed the new miniseries, I thought it gutted that core, turning the romance into what felt more like a high school crush. I kind of wish they had made a 3-season series, with ~7 episodes per season, in order to expand upon the world while also retaining the Blackthorne-Mariko romance. Just my two cents.
@Amtcboy
@Amtcboy 12 днів тому
1980 version was very much lighted up. Night time indoor scenes seemed like there were fluorescent ceiling lights. I watched the 1980 version back in the late 1980 during HS, but I can’t recall anymore if there were subtitles, coz up until now, I believe there were.
@Puffdamgcdragon
@Puffdamgcdragon 13 днів тому
Looks like the 80s version was more true to the book. But this new version is truly epic!
@bujindork
@bujindork 14 днів тому
80s was very close to the book and focused on Blackthorne(which was also book accurate). It also focused more on Blackthorne and Marikos affair and how much she comes to love him. 2024 was more of a modern retelling of political intrigue 1600 Japan with Blackthorne more of a side character. After the finale of 2024 I do like the 80s series better with Toshiro Mifune slightly edging out Sanada as the better Toranaga.
@PatriciaPerkowski
@PatriciaPerkowski 10 днів тому
In the 1980 version…Blackthorn explains to Mariko about what life was like in England…he tells her about his wife and two children back in England
@russelltimmerman3771
@russelltimmerman3771 15 днів тому
12:03 The Buddhist priests wore orange and the Catholic Jesuits wanted to be seen as holy men. So they adopted the color. Latter a new head of the order in Japan made them convert back to black.
@lucero3945
@lucero3945 5 днів тому
My mom loved the 1980s version. She loved Richard Chamberlain! I've seen the old one many times. The new one is excellent. Beautiful representation of the Japanese culture. AND everyone in it was SO GOOD!!!! They are different because the times have changed.
@MichaelLee-fg7qr
@MichaelLee-fg7qr 6 днів тому
Though the 10 1980's version is excellent, the 2024 version is SUPERB!!! Especially showing how proud and powerful Markio is! This version is truly spectacular with the great actors, beautiful costuming and beautiful sets! Truly a feast for the eyes!
@maurus01
@maurus01 15 днів тому
Thank you for the video, since I saw the 1980 version when I was a kid, that's the one I prefer, the narration of Orson Welles was great and the lack of subtitles it was the right moved to put oneself in the character shoes, not knowing what's going on and learning a long as the episodes went by. Obviously can't compare the special effects from the 80's to this new version, however it would seem all this CGI makes everything dark, like there were never sunny clear days in Japan, anyways once again thanks for the video.
@johnm2881
@johnm2881 10 днів тому
Having read the source material many times over the years and have watched the original miniseries I can tell you the book is much closer to the 1980 miniseries and everyone watched the series. It did very well. Having said that the 2024 version as mentioned in the video is quite different but having just finished episode 10 I must admit, even though different from the book all the main characters are strong and the story is great. Good comparison
@sackwhacker
@sackwhacker 13 днів тому
1:49 He plays Lord Tsunanori, Daimyo of the Uesugi Clan in Ako Roshi the year prior.
@bigstunna2049
@bigstunna2049 9 днів тому
Both are groundbreaking in their own right. I only wish they would release a sub version of the 80s
@richardwynne6596
@richardwynne6596 15 днів тому
I watched the 80's one and enjoyed it. I don't think it was ever re-shown on terrestrial TV. Can't understand why. Enjoyed this one too. The 80's one was as big and talked about as this one is now. It was talked about more actually as we only had 3 channels to watch and few people owned video recorders.
@russelltimmerman3771
@russelltimmerman3771 15 днів тому
1:08 pilot not captain.
@drcovell
@drcovell 2 дні тому
Read the last lines of the novel, where Toranaga (Tokugawa Ieyasu) states the matter as based on his and Blackthorn’s *karma* outcomes.
@chrismcguinness5405
@chrismcguinness5405 15 днів тому
I really love the 80's version. I like the new one well enough. For me it comes down to a couple things. It was one of the first things I can ever remember watching and from that point on I have always wanted to go to Japan. Also it is more true to the source material which I have read many times. I can not fault that acting in either really, the OG once was directed towards an American audience with all the roadblocks that entails, but what a cast! Mifune?!? Wells?!? Davies?!? The new one as well just not well known people and that is ok.
@MegaParillo
@MegaParillo 14 днів тому
1980 follows the book. 2024 has Japanese producers so gives the Japanese perspective, which is fine. 1980 is about an Englishman caught up in Japanese politics, 2024 is about Japanese politics with an Englishman as a chess piece. And there is a 'battle' in both, just not on screen. They both mention Sekigehara.
@mikaelhultberg9543
@mikaelhultberg9543 6 днів тому
I haven't seen the new series, but from this video it is clear that the old series, which I have seen, stays much more true to the novel (which I have read many times).
@EyeInTheSky982
@EyeInTheSky982 15 днів тому
I have the 1980 Shogun on dvd; and I enjoyed it. I found out recently the book was reissued in two parts; and each part is about as thick as a brick. 😳😲 Luckily though, I found both parts of the book on Audible; and I plan on listening to them at some point. 🙂🙂
@FindecanorNotGmail
@FindecanorNotGmail 14 днів тому
The 1980's version was shot in Japan. The modern version was shot in Vancouver, and I think it shows: the nature did not feel quite like Japan for me. Mariko's seppuku scene is at Himeji castle (34°50'18.5"N 134°41'30.5"E), standing in for Osaka Castle, as it also did in the James Bond movie You Only Live Twice.
@ukmediawarrior
@ukmediawarrior 8 днів тому
I like them both for different reasons. I have never read the book so do not know which is closer, but I grew up on the 1980 version with Richard Chamberlain as Blackthorne and still prefer that one over the modern iteration. However the modern one does look a lot better, but then it should with modern tech these days.
@JRod-XD-mod
@JRod-XD-mod 15 днів тому
concerning the sinking of Blackthorn's ship, the 2024 version was by Toranaga as well, just cleverly done in secret to make it appear Marikou had orchestrated it.
@mogomarkas3187
@mogomarkas3187 7 днів тому
For me, the main difference between the two is that there is no longer Toshirō Mifune. He gave a certain authenticity and gravitas to the series that no one can duplicate.
@xandlhofer8029
@xandlhofer8029 15 днів тому
Clearly the 1980 version is more close and true to the book, no wonder, as the author Clavell was a producer. Compared directly the older series does have more charm. I do like both though.
@joshcampelo
@joshcampelo 16 днів тому
thank you for this! new version all the way!
SHOGUN Ending Explained!
11:03
Think Story
Переглядів 119 тис.
How are Harakiri and Seppuku Different?
14:57
Let's ask Shogo | Your Japanese friend in Kyoto
Переглядів 1,8 млн
Эта Мама Испортила Гендер-Пати 😂
00:40
Глеб Рандалайнен
Переглядів 5 млн
GOLDEN KAMUY EPISODE 2x11 REACTION MASHUP!!
20:52
ANIME reaction 2
Переглядів 599
Naval Historian Breaks Down 'Master and Commander' Movie | Deep Dives
39:17
The True Story Behind Shoguns' Main Characters
55:42
History Profiles
Переглядів 27 тис.
Деконструкция. Клим Жуков о сериале «Сёгун» (2024)
56:21
Battle of Sekigahara, 1600 AD ⚔️ Tokugawa Shogunate is Born
21:19
HistoryMarche
Переглядів 514 тис.
Shogun Review : The Original Masterpiece
55:22
SamaLlamaStudios
Переглядів 415 тис.
The Entire History of Ancient Japan
1:17:35
Voices of the Past
Переглядів 4,4 млн
Shogun Ending Explained | Episode 10 Breakdown | Finale Recap & Review
26:57
ну это логично
0:19
FRANKUS
Переглядів 866 тис.
Банда МОНГОЛА #shorts
0:55
WebM_ShoRTS
Переглядів 1 млн