There was no independent Ukraine back then, so how else can you relate. History of Ukraine is history of Russia, even if you don't like it. Even the name comes from the word "outskirts", which implies it was the border region.

@@doktorkoka So, I see you are claiming you can relate more than me? First of all, the history of Ukraine is the history of the free people of Ukraine, it belongs primarily to them. We inhabit this land for centuries, so we own it. Everything that has been done by our ancestors on their (and our) land is our history. It's quite simple. And we know our history. However, we don't arrogate neighboring countries' history. People must know what is theirs and what belongs to others. Ignorance causes historical delusions and wars. Concerning the word 'Ukraine'. The fact that it sounds similar to a Russian word 'outskirts' ('okraina') is not a linguistical or historiografical evidence of its meaning. The language was quite different in times when the word 'Ukraine' emerged. Initially, it was used to describe different lands of Rus bordering with other non-Rus territories. I haven't heard people using the word 'outskirts' to call any land that has an external border but I don't reject the fact that such border territories could have a specific term. Also, the word 'ukraina'/'ukrayna' was frequently synonymous to the word 'land' in different historical documents. In historical letters of the Cossack period, besides the word 'Ukraina' itself, the expression 'Ukraine of Little Rus' ('Ukrayna Malorossiyskaya') is used. Thus, it meant literally 'the land of Little Rus', not 'the outskirts of Little Rus'. The word 'Ukrayna' was used then as a name of the country and had nothing to do with 'outskirts'. If we even try to judge about the word 'Ukraine' through modern languages, I can mention some very similar words from Slavic languages. Here you go: UA: країна - country BY: краіна - country SK: krajina - country CZ: krajina - land PL: kraina - land SI: pokrajina - landscape ... and there is 'окраина', which corresponds to 'outskirts' in Russian. Only in Russian. I think it's clear now.

@@kostiamarich but no one takes your land, the problem is the government, you can still be proud of your history and ancestors even being included in other state. Real Ukraine (I mean historically) and the territories that belong to the state now are totally different territories. It's a complex thing, and the border between two countries shows nothing but the borders. Historically most people living in modern Ukraine are russian people, as were cossacks, I believe they called themselves russian.

@@doktorkoka Firstly. It's not true that no one takes our land. I can't get to many places in Ukraine where I was before because these places are now invaded by Russia. I can't see my acquaintances there due to the same reason. Don't pretend you have no clue what's going on. Russia is the biggest country in the world. So I genuinely cannot understand: why is Russia so obsessed with gaining new territories? Secondly. It is very ignorant to say people in Ukraine are actually Russians. Actually, it offends me but I see you believe in your words sincerely. Ukrainians in the past called themselves with different names, such as 'ukrainskiy narod', 'rus'kiy narod', 'ukrainskie malorossiyane', 'savromaty', 'kozakorussy', 'kozaki', 'rusyny' and many other. The Ukrainians are East Slavs, so they are heritors of Slavic tribes of Southern and Western Rus as well as of nomadic tribes of the steppe (but not so much). We have our own unique gene pool which differs from that of Russia (containing more Finnic and Central Asian elements) and Belarus (sharing more common with Baltic peoples). We have our own language, folklore, political traditions, national heroes and the most important - national self-consciousness that has been existing for centuries. It didn't emerged once independent Ukraine appeared on the map. Ukrainians have always known they are not the same as Russians, even if it's obvious we share some similarities and the common source - Kyivan Rus. You just have to accept that history is moving. We don't want to fight with anybody but we have to because someone always doesn't like our existence as a separate independent nation. But we are so. You don't speak Ukrainian, you don't know Ukrainian folk songs, you haven't read Ukrainian literature, you know not much about Ukrainian mentality, you probably haven't been to Ukraine. But this is ours, and it's not Russian. If we are East Slavs too and our ancestors had a similar ethnonym deriving from the word Rus, it doesn't mean we don't exist but only you do. Just accept that and stop looking for a trick.

@@kostiamarich Why, I accept your existence and respect your independence as a person. It's just that state is not the real face of the nation. Ukraine as a state has little to do with real ukrainian people, same as Russian Federation is not russian people. Politicians always use people. Same as inquisition was not the true face of christianity. Speaking of that you can't visit many regions (and there are much worse problems) - it's fucking sad, man, I feel for you. Still, it's not the territory expansion war, it's a result of an obvious american plot. No western country is saving Ukraine with those weapons and "help", they're choking the country and people in it's blood, feeding the war. RF won't stop even if they drawn own people in blood. I wish the government could just yield and let RF put it's own people in charge, so no blood would be shed, but the situation wouldn't appear in first place (I mean the war) if they were not american puppets already. The war is a desperate move, and it was provoked by the american (and british) deep state, same as other slavic conflicts. As if everyone forgot already. I'm aching for everyone who have to fight though they never wanted violence, regardless of their beliefs or nation and side in the conflict. Both sides are sending people to die for their interests, and the people is the lamb. This is mad.

Agreed - gotta love it when idiots merely google search a topic whilst throwing in stock footage, claiming they're subject matter experts. Disgusting.

Lol this is true for most UKpostsrs that talk about Muslim history!

Can you please be specific?

Well said. Lazy.

@@sonah9126 He is too young to be an expert. Listen to his voice.

*Empress Catherine the Great (Sophie Auguste Friederike von Anhalt-Zerbst-Dornburg)

1. Catherine the Great invited Germans, German know-how to Russia. Not Ukraine. 2. If your ancestors were expelled by the Czar, they were expelled from Russia, not Ukraine. 3. I have never learned or heard that the Czar expelled Germans from Russia. They expelled Jews... But Germans? 4. Post-Roman Germanic areas became Christian very, very quickly. (became a part of Holly Roman Empire). And in the Middle Ages they were already Christian for about 900 years. So what post-Roman pre-Christian thing are you looking for?

Russia not only wants to control Ukraine, it controls already its new/old territories (Dotentsk, Luhansk, Herson, Zaporozhie). People oh those territories voted on Referendums for return back to Mother Russia. There is Russian rouble there in circulation which replaced Ukrainian Grivna. And children there are educated in Russian. Hi from USA 😁😁

My mom was born on a Sioux Indian reservation in Timberlake S.D. on land the US govt gave to my grandparents who were from Russia, near Odessa. My grandparents left Russia not from pressure from the Russian government but because the lands the Russian govt. (Catherine the Great) gave German immigrants like my grandparents' ancestors had become scarce through consolidation of ownership over the course of a century, so by 1900 there was no place left for my grandparents to settle for themselves. In addition, the Tsar at the time wanted to draft my grandfather and his brothers into the Russian army to fight a war against Japan; another reason to leave. My family originated in Strassburg, Alsace before emigrating to Russia, and they still spoke German at home even with my mother's generation.

if one of your siblings is a woman and can suck the metal from a rail then it is a good chance you are.

You might also enjoy this one ukposts.info/have/v-deo/a3lnaKedsJWitWQ.html

I think you men Zaporozhian Cossacks? There were multiple formations of Cossacks. Some Cossacks were later conquering Siberia for Russian Empire (although most of those territories were - and are to this day- uninhabited and some tribes agreed to join Russian Empire for protection).

Because it's a BRIEF history of Ukraine - can't go into every aspect of its history.

@@magpiegirl3783 as I said these points are quite important for understanding Ukraine's history

Thank you for your comment. It lead me to do some more reading on the situation, and has added to my awareness of more of the history of this part of the world.

It wasn't an intentional starvation, the exact same famine occurred in all of the central agricultural regions of the Soviet Union, at that time. It came as the cumulative result of years of civil war and political infighting, economic turmoil (widespread across all of Europe at the time as well) and enforced collectivisation of grain by the Soviet authorities, in order to help maximise exports and get the money needed to build Soviet industry, according to the Five Year Plan. Perhaps you're not aware of this fact, and it is actually one of the biggest errors and misconceptions of the public in general, who assume a famine only existed in present day Ukraine.

Russia never brought anything good to Ukraine; holodomor, communism, chernobyl...you name it

@@markeedeep Cool idea, but it is highly debated. Many believe that Stalin directed it at the Ukranian people and many countries view this to be the truth. The Ukranian people view it as a genocide. So be careful saying that it wasn't directly aimed at the Ukranian people because that is not know. What is known is that the Ukraine born the brunt of it and by far the most people died there.

Alberta?

@@wadopotato33 why ought I to believe it was aimed at any one group inside the SU, more than all of the others? Collectivisation of agricultural produce was universal, it was policy everywhere inside the SU.

Ukraine is far from innocent but okay, have fun with your lies. Russia and Ukraine both commit atrocities against each other since 2014, normal things.

you cannot write in blood, it's liquid.

@@rhino_force7679 Sorry Rhino. A lot of history has been written in blood. A common theme around the World.😔

thatb area belong to celtics not slavs.. its now a cursed land. !

@@jonathanr72 Poles did similar things as Stalin on those territories... polonization, destruction of Ukrainian language, heritage, culture, enslavement and denial of basic human rights... wild times

Ukraine was invaded by Russia during the Russian revolution almost right after it gained independence

In Habsburg times, Lviv was known by the German name Lemberg.

Your timeline is off. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was dissolved at the end of the First World War. There's twelve years between that dissolution and the Soviet invasion of Poland which you haven't accounted for.

Infact the nationalists and anti-russian come mainly from there, am I wrong? if they want a nazi Ukraine they can have it, but not with the borders of nowadays Ukraine because the people living in the east and in the south simply don't want them.

Aha. It tells nothing about inventing the gunpowder, the wheel, Jesus Christ beeing the Ukrainian and digging up the Black Sea. How dare they?! 😠

Such as? Just name e few. We really want to know.

Even mentioning the Holodomor on Reddit will get you banned as a far right conspiracy theorist extremist.

@@theobolt250 the most important moment from our history it is a The Ukrainian Revolution (1917-1921). In short, during those years, Ukrainians had their own state, the central bank, that is, the currency. There were many events in 4 years, managed by different people. The most important thing is that the Bolsheviks attacked our State and captured it and installed puppet governments of the so-called Soviet Ukraine.

Yes a few important key points are missing

Agreed- the US did not attempt to put nuclear weapons in Ukraine. This was about the basic right to self determination

Agreed- the US did not attempt to put nuclear weapons in Ukraine. This was about the basic right to self determination

Ukraine is Texas. If the US broke up and lost it.

Absolutely right ✅️

completely disagree with your analogy too: Poland, Ukraine, Baltic countries, Finland, Romania (Moldova) have nobody on their sides against Moscow expansionism. Has been that way even before US become superpower in 1945 or NATO was founded in 1949. Poland was even nearly incorporated into a Soviet state during Lenin's 1917-1920 war.

That's been disproved many, many times

those who cannot think of original comments are condemned to put pointless quotes instead

@@stronkserbia444 Better- those who do not LEARN from the past are condemned to repeat it. There's nothing pointless about it- IT IS TRUE.

@@Nancy-nc4sw I'm sure this is a repeat comment lol

They repeated it only because they remembered exactly how to. How would they invate my country if they didn't know it's possible?

Lie

​@@user-ly7yi3ip2l The word Lie doesn't cut it. Make your point tell us something we don't know. Surely.

prove your point or move on and let the potty-trained people talk...@@user-ly7yi3ip2l

Why when you had a choosing president he was shovels away back in 2014 by a coup????? Because he was Russian minded and the NATO wanted control over this country!!! With this willing of the NATO they didn’t hold on the agreement in the Minsk papers! And what did the Ukrains back in 1950???, almost a Armageddon created!!! And what did the Ukrains after 2014 with theire own people in the Donbas/crimea??? They are proving to be corrupt, why had Zelenski fired his generals???? So not slava ukrain, but slava freedom! War never solved a problem!

@@saymyname3097there is so much you don’t know, so do we don’t know! But do you’re research and the reason why you need to choose one side is totally ridiculous! This war is not based only on a part of the country, Geo politics go way back to at least 1918 and up to the future! The most people based theire conclusion on one part of the history and wave the previous history away! Where two sides have a conflict both sides are responsible for this! And where two dogs fight for the bone, Zelenski though he get away with it!😅

For starters, you're hair-splitting about the names. It is explicitly said at the beginning that MODERN place names are being used to avoid confusion, so who cares if they used "Russia" instead of "Muscovy". Second, the Cossacks lived on the frontiers and depending on which group you're talking about, some were temporarily allied to the Tsars, in an effort to screw over Poland or the Ottomans, others were integrated into the Russian military structure to exert greater control on the regions further east of the Dniper river, near modern-day Kharkiv. It is true that many Cossacks did resent the centralization of authority under the Tsars and fought against it, many more felt a greater affinity towards the Russians due to shared Orthodox traditions, and similarities in language---more so than with Poland and Lithuania.

@@matthewgillies7509 He's correct . Using the name "Russia" for muskovites , creates confusion , gives the impression that Moskow ever ruled Kievan Rus or inherited it's legacy . This is not the truth . By the time Moskow rose from the swamp to bargain with The Horde , Kiewan Rus was already splitted and was history . Moskow rose from under the tartars as an independent city state , not the capital of any Kiewan state . All the rest is conquered , annexed , aggressed etc . This is what characterizes today's wanna be Russians - the permanent aggression towards the neighbouring teritories, people , nations .

@@seaman5705 once again, incorrect. The Kievan Rus were not an unitary political entity, and the Rus/Ruthenian region was politically and military similar to the Italian city states, or the Swiss Cantons, or the contemporary Maya civilization. While there was a "chief" or paramount city for the cultural region, each major polis was ultimately administered separately and according to local custom. As Muscovy was the weakest, they submitted to the Mongols while Novgorod and Kiev did not. Subsequent history resulted in the slow drift of Rus culture into multiple groups, similar to the differences in language and traditions of various regions in China, Italy, and presently the English-speaking regions of the former British Empire. Russia has long claimed the mantle of "Rus" (about 500 years), so there is no inaccuracy or in describing the area as such in the video.

@@matthewgillies7509 I don't know what are you talking about . Kiewan Rus was an unitary political entity from 9th century, under Oleg , till 11th century , under Yaroslav . Then it splitted . Moskow , if I am not mistaken , was first metioned in the 12th century - no connection with Kiewan Rus . Don't really know how it became "grand dutchy" . because in the 14-15th century, was just a fortified village in a swamp - the swamp being the dutchy - no paramount city for the cultural region either . Actually there was no any culture in Moskow or arround it by that time - they where kind of savage swamp ogres like Shrek and they remained savage barbarians for another few hundred years . There was no swift of Kiewan culture towards Moskow , but culture was asimilated and adopted with the conquering of teritories by this savage swamp people . Yes , some Rurikids moved to Moskow , but they ended in the blood bath of the swamp people . The swamp people , much like today , where not even slavic, but more finic , or balto-finic . See russian DNA today - finic and mongol more than slavic . So there seems to be a propagated lie about the origins of today's Russia .

@@seaman5705 pardon if I listen to the expertise of Ukrainian with a PhD on the subject matter, over some random person online who takes exception to name place simplifications for a general audience. The Rus were not a singular entity, and the strength of one Prince to subjugate his rivals does not translate into a unitary political system, particularly when multiple cities were Republics.

I love how you casually ignore Russians themselves fought a huge civil war after WWI, which was borne precisely out of a nationwide anti-communist rebellion. So Ukrainians were not the only ones who hated the Soviet government, ya know?

@@markeedeep oh yes, my bad. It's unfortunate that those were denazified in Siberia.

Just like every Soviet country ever, USSR was never a proper country, it's a military occupation, it's shouldn't and can't exsist forever because it's illegal to begin with.

You offer a useful and important correction - that there was an internal struggle in Ukraine about whether or not to join the USSR - then undermine yourself by saying something that is a historical distortion - that they were "puppets of Russia." Once Ukraine joined the USSR, it was by no means a "puppet", it was quite a formidable and integral part of the USSR. Yes, autocratic rule from Moscow undermined the agency of soviet republics, particularly under Stalin. However, people easily forget that there were powerful bureocratic and governmental institutions in place within the USSR through which could be used to assert pressure on Moscow - not democratic pressure, but pressure nonetheless. In that sense, the Soviet Republic of Ukraine was a force to be reckoned with in Moscow. I recommend that you separate your political views from your grasp of history. Ideology tends to just distort history and keep you from really seeing things clearly. (Just a tip from a friendly historian.) Ukraine's relationship with Russia is extremely complex. It is a messy history, at the very least. But even if Ukrainians were wholly "Russian" (as Putin claims, citing the fascist philosopher Ilyin and others), it would not justify his recent attempt to invade and overthrow the democratically-elected Kiev government.

@@markeedeep "Anti-communist" is a loaded and imprecise word for the contingency you are referring to in the civil war that came after the Russian Revolution. The term "anti-communist" is from the Cold War and implies opposition to nation states run by totalitarian communist regimes like Maoist China or the USSR. For the Russian civil war, it is more accurate to use their own terms. "The Whites" opposed "the Reds." Or, "Anti-Bolshevik." Ideologically, the Whites were actually a loosely banded together group of Russians from all varieties of political orientations - monachists, republicans, conservatives, classic liberals, and even former Menshavik social democrats. (The Menshaviks were social democrats, a variety of socialism, who split into two camps at the start of the civil war.)

Crimea was still massively ethnically Russian at the time, they lend their trust to keep their Russians safe, and well to Ukraine, and when the coup happened which put a Pro-Western, anti-Russian president in 2014, they obviously saw a great mistake there, and went to liberate their Russian lands, Donbass regions broke away for the same reason since they were ethnically Russian. The first Ukraine-Russo war was the most reasonable conflict ever in Eastern European history.

@@lch7732 ha ha bot

apparently, Crimea did not have a lot of sweat water and needed this water from the Donbas region that's why it moved from Russian SSR to Ukrainian SSR (among other logistic reasons)

@@lch7732 you right

@@lch7732 Yeah, but people on here are just going to call you a bot because they lack the historical knowledge and general brain capacity to deal with any of this.

---- > I didn't get the impression that Ukraine was always part of Russia. My understanding is that the video referred to the Cosacks as mongols who invaded the Kyivan state, people, originally, from Sweeden, Finaland and tha Baltic states. It would seem that Russia has less of a claim to Ukraine than does the Norwegian and Baltic states. The video explains that Russsia, Belsaus emerged from, formed after the Kyivan state(Ukraine). . To me, it seems that Russia wants to claim the culture of Ukraine even as they are destroying it. Russian culture, today, seems like the culture of Stalin.. Putin's recent seizure of Ukrainian grain seems no less horrific than Stalin's Holodomor of 1932-1933. What Russia is doing is war crimes and genocide. I wouldn't want to see Russian civilian refugees but I think Ukraine should not be restrickted from returning fire that comes from inside Russia. I hope Ukraine can establish its independence permanently.

@@jannmutube thanks for understanding. We ukrainians wish collapse of russia, because without it this war would repeat in a few years and then again it will look like endless fight. But we don't want to annex some regions (even if they historically belongs to us: fully Slobidska Ukraine and Kuban regions), because we would recieve more problems from it. Also I would mention about our ukrainian intelligence during all history. In our ukrainian history books a great attention is concentrated at our intelligence and we learn about them on our ukrainian literature lessons and on our lessons of ukrainian history, but when I see some information or videos about our History there are no mentions about Taras Shevchenko, Hryhoriy Skovoroda, Ivan Kotlyarevskiy, Lesya Ukrainka, Ivan Franko, Yevhen Pluzhnyk, Vsevolod Nestayko, Maksym Rylskiy, Vasyl Stus, Mykola Khvyloviy or any other poets.

@@maksymkashchuk5420 --- > Historically, Russia has no special claim of origin or cultural heritage over Ukraine. Putin's effort to destroy Ukrainian culture is an effort to legitimize the Putin regime's lie of, itself, being"mother Russia" using genocide as a tool to establish revisionist history . The ignorance of the media in general is disturbing. However, I was not aware of the history until I viewed this video .... Putin, surely, knew that Ukraine would not be accepting of his "special military operation". Russia's current military tactics are steeped in its historical practice of genocide against the Kyiv Rus State (Ukraine). .... @ 5: 43, 1804, a Russian separatist movement in Ukraine banned teaching Ukraine language; .... @ 6: 52, 1876 , another ban on teaching Ukrainian language, also banned books, art, and public forums in Ukraine language; ....@ 7: 58, 1930s, the Holodomore - state sponsored famine by Stalin, stole grain and animals starved 4 million Ukrainians to death in order to finance his own agenda, . . ..@ 13: 10, Kyiv appellate court convicted Stalin, posthumously, of genocide against Ukraine in 2010.

Excellent comment.

Nobody steal your history... belorussian ukrainians and russians have the same ancestors... deal with it. Bye the way, in the 15th century the Greeks call the people of Rus, rossija.

Yep, my thoughts too. Ukraine is full to the brim with unexploited(yet) resources AND they were moving towards the EU. They would have become russia's biggest competitor for oil, gas and all the other goodies they have in their soil or grow on it. No surprise russia wants to put a stop to this. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/epalpaWRhqiqpaM.html

As I said to some others who were unsatisfied with the video: this isn't an academic paper or a Ken Burns documentary, it is a historical appetizer. It is for the layman, it is designed to foster some interest in the regions' history, not dump it all on them at once.

"who build a lot of cities in the eastern part of Rus like Lviv" since when is Lviv in EAST of any RUS??? Never was & never will be.

@@abominabelleddcadent5634 He may have mistaken - east instead of west , but otherwise he's right .

Don't worry. Soon Kiev will be renamed to Putingrad.

@@SJ-nl6xl Don’t worry. Soon Putin will join Zhirinovsky.

Until Stalin in 1945 and Nikita Khrushchev in 1954. Prior to that, Lenin, who allotted huge swaths of historically Russian territories to the Ukrainains.

@@calicocat8213 also hungarian, polish, romanian

@@Sashalexandros That, I think, was Stalin after 1945 (Yalta Conference). The fact is, the Ukrainians have never been known as kind or at least tolerant to minorities and/or cohabitants of any terrain. Any experiences or recollections, family history?

@@calicocat8213 Parts of Basarabia were attributed to USSR in 1940, when it was ocupied briefly by soviets. In fact, in the early soviet days the Party's leaders were ukraineans, theese 2 facts combined could allow to believe that the plan to divide romanian lands were at least made in the 30's. I can say only that in the attempt to destroy romanian population, my family name was ukrainized as an attempt to lower romanian the population number. Also I know that ukraineans have very cheauvenistic jokes about us, unbased. They didn't integrate well into society. In ukrainean history, they clame that they have been living here for hundres of years, yet the census of prior to russian ocupation shows that the percentage of foreign ethnicities was 11%, which became majority by 1918. It evolved into conflict with ukraineans who came on our lands as colonizers, they wanted to rip parts of our country and integrate into ukrainean state. Understandable sentiment, but don't tear pieces of other people's houses. Also search "ukrainean territorial demands at Paris peace conference 1919".

@@Sashalexandros Thanks, I'll make sure to look it up.

EU countries contributions are currently double that of the USA!

Self interest often requires some grand historic link to make rape, pillage and plunder appear less heinous.

My thoughts exactly. 🤔

@H G E So you know, I'm the OP and I thumbed up your comment. You're entirely right. Also, there is an idea of making the New Greater Russian Empire. But first it's theft, then it's fear of the power of democracy and then it's craving geopolitical power. In that order I suspect.

The EU is financially broke.. Russia wasn't....

Well said .

I agree with Lewis Fadipe 100 %. This fight has been going on for over 1000 years!!!

Ukraine has been a free nation for 30 years and has every right to remain free. Peace for Ukraine.

@@bluemoon6380 Free to murder their own citizens? They could've had peace. They chose war, or, to be precise, they allowed their leaders to drag them into war. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

@@bluemoon6380 it has not been free for a day, it is now in the hands of the USA as we speak. It will be free when the international world will leave it alone, that includes Russia.

@@bluemoon6380no free not own by corrupt oligarch Jews helping the cia who use Nazis in exile in Canada .

West ukraine was also the first and the biggest suplier of gas in ussr

Yeah. And Novgorodian Rus was before Kievan Rus.

@@omoikaneru And Politicians in Kiev Junta say now that King Vladimir in 900's wanted Kievan Rus to join European Union. Hi from USA.😁😁

And Politicians in Kiev Junta say now that King Vladimir in 900's wanted Kievan Rus to join European Union. Hi from USA.😁😁

@@mishaknopkin2199 Lmao more russians who don't want to live in russia but leave for evil NATO countries and the USA, pathetic

@@sunnyday1417 I am American for 31 years. I was invited to MIT in 1985. Already as Doctor of Sciences in USSR before 30 years old (just two cases in history of Soviet Space Programs).

About Ukraine: nation created in Lenin's time (not to be confused with the history of the city of Kiev and/or with Kievan Rus & its Rurik dynasty started by Prince Rurik of Novgorod; Novgorod is an ancient Russian city), but only theoretical/administrative terms, since it remained under Russian control in the Soviet era, the conformation of its territory today consists mainly of territories that have historically belonged to the Russians (from the center to the eastern and southern side) and the western side has historically belonged to Poland. Important issue about Poland: the h4tred of the Poles towards the Russians is immense and it is they who have partly influenced the western part of Ukraine, this h4tred is historical, since Poland and Russia have had multiple w4rs for several centuries, even the Poles invaded Moscow at some point and were driven out by the Russians (look for the monument to Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow's Red Square). Now if you add this historical h4tred towards Russia with Neo-Naz1 elements (in western Ukraine) that by default relate Russia to the greatest enemy of the Naz1s, that is, the Soviets, who ended up destroying their beloved H1tler, you will have a gigantic anti-Russian national1sm, which the United States has been able to use as a geopolit1cal tool against the Russ1ans. On the current crisis: The people of Donbass are ethnic Russians and they did not support the 2014 coup, as those who took control of Kiev (with US backing) are openly xenophob1c against the Russians, they even banned the Russian language in Ukraine, which is the native language of the people living in Donbass. Ethnic Russians have lived in Donbass for several centuries, so at the moment they are defending their families and the lands where they have lived for many generations. People living in Donbass voted in a referendum to gain more autonomy and stay inside Ukraine, the latter being important as it shows that the Western narrative that the Donbass conflict was started by "pro-Russian separat1sts" is not is so true and this was part of the typical western pr0paganda to confuse the world about reality and adapt everything to the western narrative of "it's Russia's fault", I repeat "the people of Donbass did not vote for independence from Ukraine and/or to join Russia, they voted to have more autonomy within Ukraine", in fact this is the basis of the famous Minsk agreements that Kiev and the West refuse to implement (accusing Russia of not complying with them, when Russia does not has obligations in the agreement), and it has to be repeated that the people of Donbass wanted this because they simply never accepted the 2014 coup, which brought to power people who h4te ethnic Russians. The Ukrainian army launched an 4ttack on these regions in 2014, moving its entire 4rsenal against the civilians of Donbass, this topic is important since the w4r takes place in the lands of Donbass, therefore civilian v1ctims are always the civilians who live in the Donbass (usually the Western media always interviews Ukrainian civilians living in regions that do not suff3r the real consequences of these w4rs), the people of Donbass won practically all the b4ttles, there were a lot of material on youtube about these b4ttles, where they showed civilians f1ghting aga1nst the Ukrainian army, but youtube has cens0red almost everything. These victories should not really surprise us too much, since the people of Donbass were defend1ng their homes against people who h4te Russians (their ethn1city), any of us would fight with full force if you see that your family is thre4tened by crazy rac1sts that h4te your friends and family, today after all the 4ttacks they have received by Kiev, if they hold a new referendum it is very sure that they will vote to join Russia, they have already seen the true face of the Westerners and of those they control Kiev today. It is true that Russ1a supports those Russ1ans who live in Donbass, in fact it has more right to do so than the illegal military presence of the Y4nkees in northern Syr1a ("support1ng" the K*rds and steal1ng Syrian oil along the way), the inhabitants from Donbass are ethn1c Russ1ans, they are in lands close to the Russ1an border (secur1ty issue), they have an obvious connection with Russ1an culture and above all they share many family members with Russ1ans, for this reason after 2014 many residents of Donbass have obtained a Russian p4ssport (Russian citizensh1p).

@@Dirtmiy what a bullshit you just shitted on the Internet 😅 go to the restroom please, Putler poppy

Everything that is said here cannot be denied (at least for a part or bigger part). But the Ukranian language is just the oldest form of Russian. Just as Belorus has also it's own variation thereof. The factors that do differentiate it from "regular" Russian are geographical, ethnical and maybe to some extend religious/political. Such a proces of differentiation is seen everywhere in the world. So, don't forget, Ukranian is OLDER than Russian!

And yes, you missed it! Like this video said it STARTED with the Duchy of Kyiv! They were dominant from the 10th up to the 13th century. In the beginning of the video. Can't miss it actually.

@@Dirtmiy 2014 wasn’t a coup bro… it wasn’t an organisation it was the people themselves… in dictionary terminology that’s known as a revolution, but please do go on about how Russia is the second country in history after nazi germany to invade a country based on existential threat horseshit. They’re not xenophobic either… you just keep threatening them to the point where they can’t stand you (can’t blame them)… and the US only backed them through infrastructure, nothing wrong with that… moral of the story if Russia wanted to avoid this… don’t threaten people, don’t starve people to death and don’t invade under horseshit accusations.

The "insurgent army" ...yeah probably don't want to mention the original name of that. I won't judge the dead for they did what they had to do but for anyone that thinks having to pick between USSR and Nazi Germany was glorious - no a lot of people ended up stateless all over the world or sent to camps waiting for years after the war. Anyway, my message is not directed at you purely but war tourists and others like the US and Canadian pro-Kurdish "fighters" in the Syria and Iraq. Good intentions perhaps...

West still doesn’t know what about happened there

Exactly the ukrainians are not being taught about the massacre to my knowledge.just as Soviets are not being taught about Katyń.

… and other issues between Poland and Ukraine…and yet somehow Poland and Ukraine have managed to continue on a civilized path to achieve a level of mutual respect. Russia, on the other hand, continues to be a criminal and barbaric state. Слава Україні! Героям слава!!🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

@@ukerkater True. What is up with Russia?

@@ukerkater well only because Olea has shown some humanity towards them doesn’t means they were right. Don’t forget that government pushes this agenda and people are getting tired of it a little as now poles have problems of getting doctors appointments and many other things due to priority given to Ukrainians. Putin shouldn’t get there but wast has created the whole situation to push him to do something- he did what was in his mind right. By the way check how many Russian speaking or Russians has been killed in Ukraine since 2004 by its far right wing.

Andrew - this didn’t help you to understand the history of Ukraine. This video is shockingly inaccurate and skips centuries of history relevant to todays Russian war on Ukraine. Starting with maps, through to false information about Cossack’s uprisings.. Those were never to join Muscovy (called here Russia) although the last uprising had - only partially - such result. Uprisings were to gain recognition of Kossack aristocracy - as equal to the one of Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth - and within it, and to stop Catholicism spreading and being privileged in their lands. After multiple uprisings - Chmielnicky (Kossack leader) asked Muscovites (Russians) for help - what ended with partition of Ukrainian lands between PL-LIT Commonwealth and Russia. That partition has consequences till this day - in what language people speak, and also up until recent Russian invasion - the level of self identity as Ukrainians - being strong where Commonwealth once stood, and not so in the east of the country. The previous division is still visible for example in nova days electoral results. The video instead talks a lot about Crimean war - which may be important to UK coz of its involvement but far less for understanding Ukraine..

Russia not only wants to control Ukraine, it controls already its new/old territories (Dotentsk, Luhansk, Herson, Zaporozhie). People oh those territories voted on Referendums for return back to Mother Russia. There is Russian rouble there in circulation which replaced Ukrainian Grivna. And children there are educated in Russian. Western Ukraine will return to Poland. Hi from USA 😁😁

Privileged? ....clown

The three famines organized by the Soviet communist authorities in in 1921-1923, 1932-1933, 1946-1947, which took the lives of 4 to 10 million Ukrainians, as well as mass forced deportations of Ukrainians to Siberia, as well as mass executions of Ukrainian elite are vivid proof of your words. Throughout its history, Ukraine was at the intersection of civilizations and cultures: the Western world (Poland, Austria, Hungary), the Eastern world (Mongols, Tatars, Russia) and the Muslim world (Crimean Tatars and Turks). Ukraine has lost its independence many times due to agreements between the Eastern and Western worlds (Perpetual Peace between the Muscovite Kingdom and Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1686, the Peace of Riga between the Soviet Union and the Republic of Poland in 1921) on the aggressive division of the territory of Ukraine between them.

Polland was same as russia.....were killing Ukrainians and its language

"Our version" of history, as you define it, is academic and fundamentally different from that offered by the Kyiv manipulators, in that it is based on an evidence base, on historical documents generally recognized by the world community.

I didn’t see anywhere your comments on the CIA and The Ukraine Mess That Nuland Made?!!!

Even mentioning the Holodomor on Reddit will get you banned as a far right conspiracy theorist extremist.

@@kehenabeach4418 fool

@@chingizsalla is someone‘s feelings hurt?

Living next to Russia does not provide any other option.

Ukraine is located in the middle of everything. Of course our territories must be hell with all the wars we have in the world. Like, did we have a choice during WW2? They just needed to use our roads to get to their end point. That's if we talk in general about Ukraine in the world.

It's not difficult at all. Ukraine is Russian and has been for 1000 years. The only anomaly here is the 31 years apart from mother Russia. 1000 vrs 31, yeah we know the answer.

@@sandraleiva1633, Russia owned Crimea from the 1700s to 1991, when they stupidity gave it away.

@@sandraleiva1633 💯

No, it is missing important facts and there are some false information's like the whole today Ukraine was incorporated into the USSR since 1917. It was not, the west part was taken by Poland which created Banderities (it was anti-Polish movement and not anti-Russian as there were no Russians there). This and centuries of western Ukraine being not part of Russia led into the big split of West vs East Ukraine. This split was reason for the Donbas & Luhansk rebellion against western Banderities in 2014 because they do not understand why Banderities are so xenophobic to Russians. There is no mention that the Ukraine border after WW1 were different than now - right-wing Ukraine (Banderities) consider Poland and Belarus as illegal occupiers of part of their territory and have territorial claims against them. The Donetsk was not part of the Ukraine in 1918 but incorporated into the Ukrainian SSR by USSR. There is no mention that Crimea was never of Ukraine and wanted to proclaim independence 3 times since fall of USSR - in 1992, 1994 and 2014. However, every time the Ukraine blackmailed them with military pacification so the third time, they were forced to join Russia to avoid bloodbath like in Donbass. TL;DR - Ukraine was like former Yugoslavia, being in fact a joined state of 3 different nations formed by centuries (West Ukraine, Eastern Ukraine, Crimea).

Even mentioning the Holodomor on Reddit will get you banned as a far right conspiracy theorist extremist.

Russia not only wants to control Ukraine, it controls already its new/old territories (Dotentsk, Luhansk, Herson, Zaporozhie). People oh those territories voted on Referendums for return back to Mother Russia. There is Russian rouble there in circulation which replaced Ukrainian Grivna. And children there are educated in Russian. Western Ukraine will return to Poland. Hi from USA 😁😁

@@mishaknopkin2199 misha jdy nakhyr

@@y.gromyk idu, idu vmeste s territoriyami. Ya kstati "Ukrainez" v Amerike iz Odessy. Skoro i moya Odessa ujdjot v Rossiju.

i would agree, but it's so brief that it's misleading. E.g. Ukraine have not joined USSR. Red Army set puppet government in Kharkov and later occupied rest of Ukraine, pushed Ukrainian government out of Kiev. But in the video it sounds like Ukraine has joined voluntarily. While in fact it was simply occupied by Lenin.

Agree but the video makes it sound as if Russia has preexisting claims to Ukraine and glosses over the actual historical truths.

Also there are religious pressures.

We learn to kill better so that's something.

Anthem of the USSR starts with words: The indestructible union of free republics was united forever by Great Rus'

Makes a 72% turnout and

@@sergarlantyrell7847 Where do your statistics come from? The Ukrainian response to the Russian invasion would seem to say otherwise.

@@danielhagan921 I'm not talking about any referendum in Ukraine. Those were the numbers from the Brexit referendum, that made major changes to the UK, even though the result was marginal and the turnout poor.

there are a lot of rivers in the area, and a lot of the boats could be taken up and walked short distances to other parts of rivers.

The Vikings went all over the place in Europe. I thought they had only wreaked havoc in the Baltic and North seas and the English Channel areas but found out later that I was WAY off.

@@HowardRoark5150 They we’re in the US way before Columbus

@@Terk131 Some say Columbus never even made it to the United States😂

They made it to Paris

full of 'missing' facts and mistakes. he is pro-russian freak

The guy made totally wrong video with huge number of omitted facts, inconvenient for kremlin. Read comments from educated people. below the video.

This is the work of an individual who has google searched the history of the region within one day, before writing a quick transcript to some stock footage and adobe after effects. This is amateur to say the least and an insult to the Ukranian people. I'm suprised this pisstake is still online for viewing.

NATO reliance in energy? Why would a "Defensive Alliance" need energy in quantities it'd have to "rely on"?

Learning history from around the globe…..so important! Make sure your history is correct and factual! ❤️

You actually learned wrong lol😂 read books, here info is very mixed up and much important facts are not said ps I am from Ukraine.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/jKqYhICckJCSsIk.html

very naive and surface level view point

@@viktorias63 ok, so you believe that the largest country in the World are fighting for more land mass with a virtually non existent GDP and an economy that barely meets the definition of “emerging?”

not far from the truth honestly

I wonder who hid their reply…

You might also enjoy this one ukposts.info/have/v-deo/a3lnaKedsJWitWQ.html

Like the religious struggle in the region. Russian Orthodox vrs. Catholic Orthodox. Muslims and Jews, etc. They all want in the fight.

Heil tsar putin

God! How are they brainwashing you... Hundreds of people who fled from Mariupol are screaming that Azov (who is acting on the orders of that same Zelensky) bombed and burned their houses, killed and tortured people. People truly hate him! Mutilated bodies of women with German fascist swastikas were found in bomb shelters! Azov, under the pretext of organizing green corridors, led people to be shot. Children, women, old people ... Russians, unarmed military prisoners on camera, were shot at the legs and their throats were cut! In Bucha, people were killed when Russian troops left from there! And they killed people with white bandages on their hands (a sign of civilians). And all this is video and photo evidence. You will never be shown this ... And the Russian people are crying! Weeps from the fact that we have always been taught that Ukraine and Russia are brothers. And in Ukraine there are people who love and want to go to Russia! We will gladly accept them! But this cannot be forgiven! Please wake up! You can not look at the situation only from one side! 😭😭😭

Bro you added a trans flag

@@Adam-cu3ue huh? thats a joke right?

Вот это насмешка - Азовцы и другие "арийцы" сражаются за права трансов. Вот это поворот для них, если они что то осознали хд

The problem is that this division is useful and invented by Anglos. And Look at Anglos: they never divided them selves. Even India still has a formal alliance with UK. Even US is working hand to hand with Britain. That’s why they are so powerful. UNION. That’s why China is so powerful. UNION. That’s why Russia WAS so powerful before Anglos put his shit. And that’s why they push division (search the Independence “heroes” en Latin America against Spanish Empire and search who support the black legend in America against Spain. Spoiler: Anglos). Slavic people has to do the same as panarabs: UNION. PanSlavism is what Russia government seek and that looks a good idea if you don’t want to be divided and be de dog of Anglos. If not, Russia soon will be divided and dominated by Anglos like is Latinamerica right now.

@@rodoespinosa4680 this is not true. A sense of Ukrainian and Ruthenian identity separate to Russians and Poles has existed for centuries. There have been several attempts at an independent state of Ukraine that were crushed by either Poland or Russia over the years before we achieved independence through a referendum (in which all oblasts voted for independence). Pan-slavism is just imperialism under another name.

Not when you lost over 50 million people in WW2 and have been invaded countless times by the West. Being that Ukraine is flat and easy to invaded and reach the Russian core.

@@sandraleiva1633 Sandra) thanks for adding. What inspires you?

@@rodoespinosa4680 Anglos never divided themselves? Are you kidding? Did we just imagine the War of Independence? The fact that we still cooperate does not make us a single nation. The Anglos are Germanic (in case you didn't know). We still cooperate with Germany and France much of the time but the Germanic tribes that founded these SEPARATE nations went their SEPARATE ways a long time ago (following the decline of Rome). I imagine a lot of Ukrainians are more than willing to cooperate with their Russian cousins. They just don't want to be their pets. They don't want to be Russian. Just like Americans don't want to be Brits. They want to do things a bit differently. And good for them. Oh, and as far as we know, the Anglos (as you call us) were actually mostly Saxons (a closely related but SEPARATE Germanic tribe that had DIVIDED even further back in time). But that's an even longer story of separate nation building.

Anthem of the USSR starts with words: The indestructible union of free republics was united forever by Great Rus'

Ukrainian corrupted Nazis are not heroes, they are criminals.

Nooooo, not at all! It was not reason

@@user-hv9vn4fi4w Actually, it is based *precisely* on those events, regarding the movie.

@@chissstardestroyer 🙄🙄

@@TheRealBillBob What do you mean by *that*, pray tell?

I wish I didn't get this.

So, you are saying that Crimeans who are predominantly Russians by ethnicity and totally russian-speakers have had closer ties with Ukraine than with Russia? That's a funny statement:) And your statement about the origin of Russians and Ukraineans absolutely contradicts with science. As for the origin of the nationalities, according to Y-chromosome researches the are two local maximums of ancient Slavic haplogroups located in Southern Poland and Central/Southern-West Russia. Yes, there was an intermixion with "Finnish"- Uralic but mostly Baltic peoples in Russia, just like with Dinarics-Balkanians in Ukraine, but it was a two-way road, for example Erzya (Mordva) people are probably no less Slavic by origin then Ukrainians.

@@algo8082 And where and when did the Russians come to Crimea? They have only been there for the last 100-150 years. After the mass genocide and deportation of the Crimean Tatars. Those russian speakers who are there are typical occupiers. Regarding the close ties: you take into consideration only the last 100 years, ignoring 1000 years of cooperation between the regions of mainland Ukraine and Crimea. Regarding genes: all people in the northern hemisphere are 98.8% genetically similar, but this does not negate the issue of culture and spiritual tradition that distinguishes Slavs and Finno-Ugric people. Russian culture showed its artificiality and inability to teach the united Finno-Ugric tribes that it is bad to rob, steal, rape and kill. Therefore, it is not a question of genes, but of cultural evolution, which the so-called russia has not undergone

@@RomanKushnir And Ukrainians forms the majority in Odessa region - former Bujak region of the Ottoman Empire. Genocide or deportation? Maybe it's just a colonization of sparsely inhabited lands like in America? And btw Crimean Tatars weren't innocent lambs through all their history.

K I E V A N Rus date back at least 1600 years, some say even 2000 years before Ukraine was even a fucking idea my friend.

@@TomislavPuklin-wz1bl so what? Now we are nation and independent country just like any other in the world.

@@arsenii9329 So independent in fact that there is a recorded phone call of a US secretary of state and US ambassador to Ukraine handpicking your government officials after 2014 coup.

@@TomislavPuklin-wz1bl russian federation exists from 1991 so what? Ukrainian 1991 borders are recognized by russia too in 1997

Well, well, well; it is not as simple!!!

You are correct sir, I caught that mistake also.

And what can you say about the bay of pigs invasion just months before the Cuban crisis? You think America so good or?

That was just one of many disgraceful errors with this video - makes me sick to think this channel claims they're subject matter experts.

Who cares? Crimea is Russia since 1783. Hi from USA

@@mishaknopkin2199 Who cares? so why aren't you eager to return Alaska to Russia then?

@@viktorias63 Banderovka, what are you going to do with Russian Crimea if somehow (in your wet dreams) you get it? Force Russian people to talk mova? Kill all "traitors" i.e. 98% of Crimea population who voted on Referendum in 2014 to go back to Russia after a short historical nonsense of 1991-2014 when Crimea turned out to be in Ukraine. Our America keeps Russian heritage of Alaska after the sale of "Russian America", but your Banderstan wants Crimea for nothing cancelling all Russian history and culture. 😂😂😂😂

@@mishaknopkin2199 And before that? and after 1954?

@@mishaknopkin2199 And, Kalingrad was German for centuries. Stop trying to defend Russian barbaric invaders. Hi from the USA.

Basically, no. The rivalry was there but it was rather soft. Novgorod was the first capital until Rurik (the first ruler of Rus) died, then the capital was moved to Kiev and that was it. After the fracturing of Rus into several duchies (100 years before the Mongol invasion) there of course was rivalry between all of them, including Kiev and Novgorod.

You are right Lviv = Lemberg. Lots of people from austria-hungary moved there due to cheap land, and vision of new start. Something like journey to amerika, but eastwards. Poles, czechs, slovakians most of them killed by banderistas in ww2

My grandparents are all from western Ukraine in what was as the time Austria-Hungary. At the end of WWI the Ukrainian part became the West Ukrainian People's Republic for less than a year before losing to Poland. Western Ukraine and southern Poland are part of an area once known as Halychyna (Galicia). Poles and Ukrainians have had some bad history between them (like many neighboring peoples) but the common, centuries' old enemy of Muscovy/Russia unites them.

No you're not mistaken. The USSR was created by forcefully annexing all those Western territories, including 3 independent Baltic states. Only Finland resisted and managed to remain independent although at a very high price. Russia during it's entire history was conducting aggressive wars instead of developing it's own resources and building prosperity for itself. The main premise for Russian empire and the USSR were based

@@annavorobiev5081 that was not the question anna, no reason to mixed in your xenophobia hatred here. And those aggressive wars are compare to of those of colonial britain, spain, regime changes of usa, or what we talking about here?

Even mentioning the Holodomor on Reddit will get you banned as a far right conspiracy theorist extremist.

Сталин спас крымских татар депортировав их. Не исключено ,что все они были бы убиты разъяренным населением после освобождения Крыма. Особенно вернувшийся с войны мужчинами. 99% мужчин крымских татар работали на нацистов. В том числе помогали и самостоятельно организовывали геноцид народов, проживающих в Крыму.

@@user-nu7fl2dz5q Do you know that USSR was the first who wanted to cooperate (and cooperated) with Germany and even started WW2 together. So do not be a hypocrite.

Crimean Tatars voted on 2014 Referendum mostly for return to Russia. Hi from USA.

Uhhh Genocided Ohhh come it was deportation sure its bad but they werent killed were they ?

​@@miroslavdusin4325 Prvý spojenec nacistického Nemecka bolo fašistické Poľsko. Vojnovú zmluvu proti ZSSR podpísal Pilsudski a Hitler už v roku 1934, postupne bol celý kolektívny západ spojencom nacistického Nemecka, potvrdil to kolektívny západ v Mníchove 1938, schválili Hitlerov plán. ,,Main Kampf " a vyzbrojili nacistické Nemecko ČSR zbraňami a darovali ČSR zbrojovky nacistickemu Nemecku . Dohoda o neutočení podpísaná Molotovom & Ribentrop bola posledná so všetkých ktoré Nemeco uzavrelo. Takže tak pokrytec.

I agree whole hearted. I have to admit that i strayed from the topic in a impressive way 😇 The only place in the world that have better soil than Ucraine is the furthermost part of Sweden (here). The Swedish 10+ lands is however tiny compared to the Ucrainian lands. In the 19'th century, Sweden built railway tracks and stations allover this land and nowadays (i was against it 😇) we build windmills on everything that doesn't have outdated railway tracks. This fact might be outdated but (last i heard, about a year ago) Sweden had 4850 active windmills. We have loads of hydro from northern Sweden, nuclear from the middle of Sweden and wind/sun from everywhere. I have a "environmentally friendly" energy subscription (not what i hoped for but we all know how voting function in a household). Looking at my energy bills i (shockingly 🤡) learn that i had 0,0% of my energy usage from sunpower and between 0,8 and 2,0% from wind. This is obviously simplified numbers but the 98-99% of my needs is actually satisfied by hydro from the far north of Sweden. To transport energy cost energy (that's how a radiator functions). Somewhat overkill statistics but an undisputable fact--> during WWII, Germany used four times as mush fuel to transport fuel, as they used to wage war (that Germany used coal to create the power needed to make gasoline from coal isn't something that the Greens mention every day 😨) Spend 4 $, €, ¥, dog turds, something to get 1 in return. Vote Green.

We aren't really feeling anything that has to do with Ukraine. That's what the West blames to justify it's agenda. Food can easily be produced in many other places.

Because US aended to much weapon and Zelensky put the own country on SAIL. That he bekame an real Slaves of own and this part of sistem which he leaded himself.. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

The economy of Ukraine is dead and will never come back. Those who started this conflict between Russia and Ukraine are intrested in destruction of both countries. Stupid zelenski is a little dog on a leash. Insignificant actor who has been paid handsomely by scumbags of west, including grand Master Schwabb to bark loud and fancy. He is the first who will betray his own people.

Ukraine merged after WW2 with Russian influence. It was like the uk to Ireland and Scotland. If you had given the east a vote during the last 8 years. They would have left West Ukraine. West Ukraine wouldn't let them leave as the East Ukriane is rich of resources including wheat and gas. Also industry. The EU is trying to grab it.

agreed!

one detail. the sex-offender is Western Ukraine who was taken in USSR in 1945. They tried to move the fence to East to rape Russians to be Ukrainians and speak only Mova. Hi from USA.

You lump all Chinese together? The fight (attack of the Russian Federation on Ukraine) is far more complex over where the fence is. It is about imperialism, expansionism , historical revisionism and genocide.-- Perhaps you would prefer to refer to it as a "conflict"?

Just Ukraine. "The" is no needed.

You support Russia? I support Ukraine from the Keivan Rus'

@@kayleightucker6510 no I do not support Russia I hope Ukraine kicks their collective arses

@@vexillonerd True, but it was the acceptable form up until the 1990's and it takes time to change habits. Older people still think it sounds funny without the "the". It comes from Soviet customs and not at all just an American idea. I find myself doing it, as well.

Hahahahaha, what a pile of garbage.

Stop lying about the Kuban! Kuban has never been a part of Ukraine, and then there was no Ukraine as such!

😂

Тогда уж красная армия оккупировала всю Россию! Это ж гражданская война была. И Украина тогда была неотъемлимой частью Российской Империи. Среди Малороссов красные тоже были, как и везде.

Yes, only 90% of the leadership of the Ukrainian Republic were Ukrainians ahaha

Glad you enjoyed it!

Agreed

Surely it could be done well enough. Until a few months ago I've never heard official reorganization for anything Brest-Livotsk generated as it was a Central Powers Treaty. All the short lived late-WWI and Russian Civil War era states which Austria-Hungary or Germany recognized on the Eastern front along with mobile forces like the Czech legion all had their own reasons for fighting the Bolsheviks. A genuine mutiny occurred in 1917 within the Tsarist Army and the Entente were in either denial or had a total lack of intel when the February Revolution came. I spent most of my former-USSR focus in Central Asia but you can't start to understand the entire entity without being as dispassionate as possible. Well that's not likely, but in the last 5-6 months I have seen multiple "unorthodox" readings of some united anti-communist front between Whites, Blacks and Greens or something impossible like that.

And while spending half the vid on the 20th century, it never mentions that, for all its "dignity", the "Maidan" revolution was a CIA / Neo-Naughties illegal coup. That is what in turn led to what is callously called here, "a pro-Russian uprising in Eastern Ukraine, which Russia is suspected of sponsoring [By whom? Look up "Jacques Baud, NATO"] and which has been termed as an invasion [by whom?] saw fighting begin in the Donbas region, which continues at present. [...] Also in 2014, Russia annexed Crimea, which had been part of Ukraine since 1954 [and before then???] The reasons for this are complex". Like over 90% of the population of Crimea being ethnic Russian and feeling either Russian or Russian-Ukranian and very close to Russia? And voting in a referendum in 2014 to join Russia? Complex like that? Clear propaganda. Which is why they needed to spend all that time in the 20th century. NATO only mentioned in passing? Steer clear of this. Propaganda 100%.👎

Новгород не відносився ні до Росії ні до території України, це була окрема земля. І Московія зробила геноцид Новгорода! А про Рюрика немає жодного документа, це придуманий персонаж

Novgorod got nothing to do with Russia until its annexation by Ivan the Terrible try harder

The "first capital" of what?--Of Novgorod maybe? There were no Tsars then! Kyiv is spelled Kyiv not Kiev--come on! What are you trying to say?--or make up?

@@WangAiHua че ты несешь? Новгород столица Новгорода? Тогда были Князья в англиском нет такого слова

@@user-yj5jg8xs2p Novgorod (the city) initially was the capital of Novgorod (the state), just as Moscow (the city) was the capital of Muscovy (the state), Kyiv (the city) was the capital of Kyivan Rus' (the state). As you say English words like "prince" was not used but was perhaps a less accurate English translation of Kniaz.