Nice Bro

00

Very awesome as always

Ya its the shit

We have found stars that by our best reckoning are older than the known Universe. So unless the age of the Universe or the age of these stars is proven wrong it puts strong evidence into the big bounce camp. The reason I say this is because all galaxies have intergalactic medium surrounding them. So unless the universe is truly infinite then some galaxy has to be last to go into the big crunch. I postulate that if this is the case and at the point of the most density you don't find any neutrons but just quarks and other quantum particles crushed so close together they are solid. There must be a point at which the repellent forces of the quarks cause an explosion sending the mass of the universe back out to begin anew.

Definitely not just you

Me

Yes me too

Yep

And me too 😴

Haha! You said it, bro.

True if we were closer we wouldn’t exist really shows how many independent things have to occur for life to flourish

Sure, but you're also looking back in time. For all we know the Milky Way was a quasar when it was younger. The light from some of these extreme things has travelled for billlions of years. They won't be there anymore now, if that word even has any meaning in spacetime. But you know, our now. So most likely they represent a phase in the development of early galaxies and can no longer form for whatever reason. Space is just...difficult when you consider both space and time. And you can't really understand anything in space without both. All sunlight you have ever seen is 9 minutes old. But the individual photons can be hundrreds of thousands of years old, because it is hard even for photons to make it out of the sun's core. It can take a long time.

Ahhh come onn, human curiosity (stupidity) tells me we’d embrace it while doing back flips, go pro camera strapped to our heads. #onegiantleaptowardsdoom ✌🏾

Hope you’re feeling better! 🌸

I suggest SEA too.

Maybe people who think science is against their religion or something.

@@airnoiphongsavath8509 yeah it's quite odd. Science and Religion can exist side by side. The universe exists, so science must and has to exist, simple as that. Plus the funny thing about all those people like that, is that earlier scientists were mostly religious

@@deadly_mir Don’t forget about the flat planeteers that claim we’re unable to travel to space due to the firmament. A great deal of them also think that there’s water on the other side of that firmament, not just empty space.

@@justincasey_grabbederpussy6756 And the other loonies who think himans cannot go to space because of the Van Allen Belt, or some such bollocks. So many strange ideas out there.

@@owenshebbeare2999 I know right?!? The small little tiny things that they use as proof/evidence for their arguments is what’s really comical. They’re saying that the Falcon 9 rocket was “bouncing off the firmament” and never made it into space!

Mare - Mah-Ray - correct pronunciation of the Italian word for SEA.

Right!?

pinheads like you are impressed with visuals. The content of this rubbish is scientific BS.

@@andyiswonderful 💪🏾

@@andyiswonderful religious by any chance Andy?

Check out dttv and viper too

There will ALWAYS be more to discover out there.

Mr47Shots Even the most prominent physicists and astrophysicists don't ever claim that they "can't find anymore knowledge to obtain about space". You're either deluded or a douchebag.

Until proof of other life , we are alone. It may just be true until the day it is not.

😀

Science doesn't deal in proving negatives. If you want to make a claim, provide positive proof for it. Until then, it's assumed false.

@@wasd____ - No, not really. Science doesn't "assume" it's false. If there's some evidence to examine but it's inconclusive, then it remains a hypothesis. If there's no evidence at all that can even be investigated, like for gods or ghosts and such, then science just has no opinion on it. The personal beliefs of individual scientists is a separate thing.

@@renejean2523 "No, not really. Science doesn't "assume" it's false." It literally does. The null hypothesis (that is, the negative statement countermanding the positive hypothesis currently at question in an experiment) is assumed to be true until falsified (thus making the positive claim true instead). "If there's no evidence at all that can even be investigated, like for gods or ghosts and such, then science just has no opinion on it." Wrong. There is a perfectly valid opinion on claims with no evidence that can be investigated to support those claims: they're presumed false. "The personal beliefs of individual scientists is a separate thing." Good thing I didn't mention 'personal belief,' then. If you want to be so clear about the conceptual distinction, then likewise please don't try to muddy which one is actually being discussed.

Science-YT-Channels are like a Puzzle: You cant do anything with just 1 of them. And Learning never 'ends' anyway! So dont mind me if i recommend some nice channels you may or may not know: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Hbomberguy. -Redditor. -Legal Eagle. -Michio Kaku.

Nothing fishy about this channel then so, and you're not a sleeper bot account? Why aren't there any photos of things when the English narrator pretending to be South African speaks about photos? These photos are public domain.

Agree completely!

but BGM dont make sense

True it is. 👍🏼

Pp

What would make you assume that there is a creator?

Right?!

Facts

This channels amazing, I love it ! “KOSMO”

Buddy deserves more subs

360k subs...channel with adorable kittens: 5 mil subs. This is why we'll probably stay in our suburban system forever.

Honesty? Are you serious? Pretty much everything discussed in this cartoon is literally science fiction. Scientism. When you find out how dedicated these “scientists” are to their religion you should be highly skeptical of their methods to say the least. If you are honest, that is. We have been taught to simply believe what they tell us. Have you ever looked into their methods of finding out the distance and ages of the luminaries we see in the sky? While watching this , did you notice how many times he made positive claims about age and distances of lights in the sky where the numbers are so ridiculously high that if it were true bot would be utterly impossible to see them . We are talking trillions and trillions of miles away. To put that in perspective, 1 trillion seconds comes out to 31,000 years. Everything that was said is a lie .

@@MultiFisherofmen there is truth to what you say there, people say they believe science but there methods are not always correct.

Sleep with that shite music banging away?!

Really?? You watched this, and didn't wonder what the hell he was talking about when he said "dethane" over and over? jackass.

@@andyiswonderful calm down

❤😅🙆‍♂️i goch you

@@psi4262 I'm pleased you got me

Reference? Nevermind. Heard him say it as I typed the question mark... Ha

@@BLD426 Science-YT-Channels are like a Puzzle: You cant do anything with just 1 of them. And Learning never 'ends' anyway! So dont mind me if i recommend some nice channels you may or may not know: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Hbomberguy. -Legal Eagle. -Michio Kaku.

Science-YT-Channels are like a Puzzle: You cant do anything with just 1 of them. And Learning never 'ends' anyway! So dont mind me if i recommend some nice channels you may or may not know: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Hbomberguy. -Legal Eagle. -Michio Kaku.

He also stole music directly from @melodysheep's "Timelapse of the Future" video without crediting him...

😂

😂😂😂

No s#!+. Strong accent on heoouule huh? Love it.

Pretty sure he’s an it.

@@renegadenobody6802 I have heard a few different accounts, including an artificial voice, and the narrator is an Indian educated in the UK. No idea really, but the pronunciations do seem to upset Americans for some reason.

Science-YT-Channels are like a Puzzle: You cant do anything with just 1 of them. And Learning never 'ends' anyway! So dont mind me if i recommend some nice channels you may or may not know: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Hbomberguy. -Legal Eagle. -Michio Kaku.

@@slevinchannel7589 omg. Thank you!!! I'll check them out when im free from work and dramaaaa. Thank you so so much!! 😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️

@@slevinchannel7589 omg. Thank you!!! I'll check them out when im free from work and dramaaaa. Thank you so so much!! 😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️

@@foodiemoodie6383 I love to help.

Science-YT-Channels are like a Puzzle: You cant do anything with just 1 of them. And Learning never 'ends' anyway! So dont mind me if i recommend some nice channels you may or may not know: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Hbomberguy. -Legal Eagle. -Michio Kaku.

That's somewhat arrogant. I mean, your atoms could make up Margot Robbie's left nipple instead...

@@metjammer4403 touché

@@metjammer4403.......Wtf man, those atoms might be happy as hell and saying; C'mon Met Man, let's go party tonight...We'll be your wing men!!

Yes there's oxygen space isn't up It's Over You Don't See spaceships go straight up you see them go up and curve over

1 part per 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 edit- forgot a zero

@@bluntp.n.i.c7701 spaceships go up and over because it's much harder to go straight up actually.

I'd assume that whatever grows and happens naturally on Earth would happen elsewhere... its mind blowing to think of the beginning of everything but it seems life can live as long as there isn't too much of one thing... we have life in salt water, too much salt and no life. We have life in super hot environments, but even too much heat and no life. Life grows it seems where there is just enough oxygen and water seems to be important... a atmosphere that blocks sun's radiation is a must. The weather can not be so extreme either... Earth seems to be very lucky, but if we came then there must be others... the most mind blowing is how did intelligent life come from bacteria? And when did the stage of life start? Were chickens eggs then hatched? Which came first? The baby or the adult? That is what is so hard to wrap your mind around.

@@spin-cthrowshands5553 egg came first. to me :) cos i presume it was bacterial life in a coral shell or something initially. tho for sure, how it turned into a chicken is wierd.. also we believe in evolution buit ive never seen evidence of any species changing into another species ie a cat was always a cat, it wasnt a lizard before being a cat, it was a cat that evolved into a modern cat

Kinda have to agree, background music for the fist bit was so far over the top it annoyed me. That track is not intended as a looped backround theme.

Agree with you

Yep made it 7:32 in before I changed

And what caused the first cycle ever before it became a repetitive cycle? We cant wrap our heads over that.. How can a cycle cause itself or cause anything at all when it's not there yet? If there is a cause to that first cycle, a begining, then according to the laws of nature, it must have an end. Like all cycles have a begining and an end. In other words, if there is a first cycle, then there is a last cycle. That said, whatever that caused the first cycle, is what will end the last cycle, after an unknown number of cycles. And that is on of the definitions of God. The First and the Last.

@@ayaterrahmanehassib4502 : god

I think the locals call it 'the 1930s'.