Ai destroys the currency model as resource supply can be automated, either through a democratic system or an ai resource coordinated supply system. Simply send a request to an ai model and it will be sent automatically. What need of currency is there?

I have said the same thing.

​@@arandmorganI don't think so. Currency, including btc, is just a scoreboard and with AI, one can increase one's score faster. There will always be a need for a scoreboard so people know who owes what to whom.

​@@arandmorgan Considering the fact that money serves three functions, your proposal for an AI-coordinated resource distribution system might perform the "unit of account" and the "medium of exchange" functions that money currently plays, but it does not perform the "store of value" function. Of course, if AI and robots can one day create so much abundance (think of the Star Trek universe, not the Star Wars universe) that anybody can afford anything legal, then we might no longer need money as a "store of value." People will no longer need to store huge value in the form of cash (or in other forms like stock, bonds, bitcoins, real estate, etc.) because they can "afford" everything. But this utopic scenario is unlikely to play out in the next 10 years. Also, think of expensive, exclusive health technologies like Peter Diamandis' Fountain of Life -- only with lots of money can one afford such life-expanding technologies and resources. The good news, which I've tried to explain through keynotes since 2018, is that with AI, people can create a huge amount of money in a relatively short period of time. This is how I'm able to quit in 2023 my $80/hour teaching position at a college.

Exactly you are right

These people are hypothesising, but in a manipulative way to ensure the security of their own positions, whilst deluding is all into believing security in our future positions. None of these are true and the capitalist model is over.

They are the ones missing real world experience, or they are simply being dishonest for reasons of their own

More jobs for robots,what else?

Ai won't attack us, they aren't sentient. The dangers of ai, is the ai, capitalist model combination. Ai will outperform everyone, so therefore the worker is taken out of the capitalist\worker model. We need a new model. Don't be so scared of AI. Be scared of those controlling it.

Are you on the run?

@@honkytonk4465 - Nah, just half joking / half serious, thinking about AI leading to a cyberpunk dystopia in the future. :-)

If AI is reaching human level skills at much lower costs than why should you still employ humans?Makes no sense to me.

Imagine spending ~$74K per year in undergraduate tuition alone to learn this fluff. Seriously, this topic is one the most important issues of our time and this is the best these "experts" can give us?

The fact that Columbia University is uploading this video and risking its reputation, tells me they and probably other universities have no clue how powerful AI is and can become. If this is the best "advice" they can offer, then parents and students should look elsewhere for advice. I graduated from McGill University in business, the so-called Harvard of Canada and am teaching digital marketing at a college in Montreal. The future belongs to those who create products using AI and sell them online (also with AI help). Job holders are losers.

@@peternguyen2022 disagree, Saas and chatgpt wrappers are at existential risk due to improvements in the underlying tech itself. AI model providers can provide platforms that covers niche areas quite easily and automatically, which is an issue today which is why there are so many external Saas providers

@@resa574 You should read Mack Hanan's book Competing on Value. I've read over 1000 business books and that one is easily in the top ten. Hanan explains that value comes from applying the technology to the client's business operation to yield increased profits and sustain their competitive advantage. You may be right that consumer apps based on ChatGPT are doomed, but not enterprise apps or AI systems. Each corporate client is too complex for ChatGPT or similar LLMs to satisfy their requirements.

I don't see a substantial risk for humanity as long as AI has no own goals.

That s why they didn t invite you 😅 !!!

Veil for grown up women?Do better!