Worldwide box office 260 million, budget150million not too bad

Think of how stupid the average person is... Then realise 50% of the world is more stupid than that. They chose to watch Marvel trash instead of this gem.

@@illastration1 ummmm marvel is still good. Everyone has tastes my dude. And thats ok. You shouldn't shame those with not as high standards as u. You sound pompous and douchey

I really like the Car Chase in the final parts of the movie, the way they move, how the water interacts with the cars, how the light interacts with the environment, it's extremely real.

It was an unnecessary sequel, and an attempted cash-grab based on nostalgia.

It's amazing how high quality the vfx in tv series are these days. I remember when I first watched Altered Carbon... great first season, but I was blown away that this was essentially a TV show. From the practical effects to the VFX.

Yeah I am looking for the same thing

@@enda0man found anything yet?

@@apurvz5466 nope

You mean the one with just the music? I agree that was epic!

@@KiyokaMakibi yea it was. One of my daily routines at that time.

digital

@@freetube3255 thank you. 😊😊

@@moritzstrohriegel8724 you are welcome!

Elaborate

@@faronomus1589 This video was posted before by another channel with the exact music, editing, and sequence exactly to this video maybe 2-3 years before this video came out. The other video was taken down (which didn't include a voiceover) and later this video was uploaded with a voiceover on top of the original video. The original was better, just the before and after reels without anyone talking over and was much less annoying (imo) without a narrator

I see your point, but i came to understand the pace worked for me ultimately as it built up the tension. Other big blockbuster films are too fast paced, showy, loud and in my face for my taste.

hii

Almost Every critic disagrees with you here. Many regard it as better than the original

@@galador8089 I don't care what the critics say. Blade Runner offered a lot of new topics in 1982 and Blade Runner 2049, on the contrary, offered nothing new but concepts that for the 2017 viewer were perfectly feasible. What the viewer saw in 1982 was... revolutionary. Blade Runner went down in cinema history, the 2017 version is a run-of-the-mill movie.

Problem was at the time it was a flop in 1982, it didn't hit hard until it gained a cult status audience when released to Laser Disc and Video tape and then only through that decade people began to see it as hard hitting. I had the film on video cassette etc...read the original Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (If you haven't read it I recommend it, different to the film but also new and interesting ideas...Mood Organs etc...) and unfortunately the spin off books. Also a good book to read on the first Blade Runner film is Future Noir by Paul M Sammon. I like the new Blade Runner film, for different reasons, perhaps as a sentimental homage.

@@adib396 That is true. If you were into science, technology and the philosophy of both, you understood the implications in 1982. People who lived thinking about something else were slow to realize it. And then there was the issue of the dark aesthetics of Blade Runner, which hit the hardest because you could see it directly . Like the aesthetics of the Matrix.

as someone who wasnt around to see the original i throughly enjoyed the sequal.