all white things are suppressed

@@onlythewise1 For real! my girl always makes me wear a condom. I hate! being suppressed like that.

@@onlythewise1 I know right! Fridges, freezers, dish washers, polar bears, milk, cream, cotton, snow, paper, clouds, the list goes on.

@@kotastrophie good thing she didn't cut it off like other females have done , you won't joke about it then will ya

Not real

Can't wait till man does space travel and goes to the moon

😮that's amazing travel outside the world

@@isaidthat4505 К сожалению это вопрос даже не сегодняшнего дня, и не ближайших лет. Человек не выживет на Луне и нескольких часов. Там нет защитного слоя атмосферы, и там нет земной магнитосферы, которые защищают от разрушительных солнечных лучей и частиц. На поверхности КОРИЧНЕВОЙ (подчеркиваю) Луны слой в несколько метров радиации несовместимый с жизнью человека, более того, напоминаю, что Солнце - это огромный ядерный реактор, который бьёт прямыми лучами по незащищённой поверхности Луны. Перепады температур в двести градусов. Всё это и ещё сотни причин не дают возможности в ближайшие года посетить НИКОМУ Луну. Если только разовый - недолгий полёт в один конец😁

​​@@isaidthat4505Your pretty late son. Can't wait till they film the landing sites up close. But now with AI you guys will say that's fake too. I was in middle school for the Apollo missions. Too bad you weren't around to see it all happening. A half a million people worked on the project. I suppose u will say that's fake too. Small minds you have.

NASA can you go to Colombia in South America and put the flag there on planet Earth

Actually that’s a good point. We have large sensor cameras with real good low light performance with the capability of storing thousands of images. There is going to be so much to look at on the next mission.

And I would pretend an alien monster was coming for us, bouncing away .😂

As well as livestream the moon's surface and a 24/7 telescope pointing at Earth

@@skatepark02”Low light performance” is irrelevant on the Moon’s surface during daylight. The required exposure settings would be about the same as standing in an asphalt parking lot on a sunny day on Earth.

Yes Good point, I dont know why I brought up low light, I think i was tired. Dynamic range however. People might stop complaining aout not seeing stars @@executivesteps

That's evidence enough for me that it's real, that men like that would turn into excited children. No way they're on a sound stage, they wouldn't be that good at acting.

@@jodyssey9921 And that's only one of a LONG list of reasons why it would be impossible to fake

❤😅

I think they are all equally important in their own way.

Yeah, ask Netherlands how they liked their petrified moon rock.

@@-TheOracle- Petrified wood it was and not even near interesting.

Ha ha.... you *still* think the moon landings were real? 😂

1) Take into account where the recording is taking place (in Houston). There's no reason to expect a delay when an astronaut speaks and Houston answers. The delay is in the other direction, when Houston speaks and an astronaut answers. 2) Many documentaries and other shows edit out the delays because the audience doesn't want the long pauses and wasted time. The delays are always correct on the original recordings.

Because it never happened...it's all a lie.

Damn that's nice

You mean he died?

Did you happen to know the 'coke bottle' lady?

@@MrMarco855 No females on our shift. Don’t think there were on the other two shifts either. Might have been such a person on day shift, but they were pretty much a mystery to us shift staff..

*THAT* was for Unbelievers?? O "it happened" i see, never heard that before....

Am an Aerospace Engineer too young for Apollo. We admire folks like your dad for this achievement. Our modern work stands on their shoulders.

Condolences on the passing of your dad. I am sure that you are proud that he played a part in an amazing achievement. Take care.

Buy the Lego for Saturn V.

Did you ask that NASA stuff about the Moon? How was his experience with Moon and is this document or a movie??? What do you think about Moon landing?

Studio Work😂 How easily came back in all Man Moon Missions 😂 They fooled the world.

If it’s one time, we can say studio work but they went 5 times?

No atmosphere on moon and we can see the flag is waving like their is wind blowing.. Haahhh Nice studio edit but forget about minor details 😂😂😂😂

@@sushandkrishna7220 You cannot convince those who choose to bury their heads in sand. All those conspiracy theories have been convincingly debunked. They all have scientific explanations, including the flag-wave "gotcha" that ignoramuses like to cite. By the way, there were 6 successful human landing on the moon, all by American astronauts. Adding all their missions, a total of 12 men walked on the moon.

​@@CallmeMaspr Are you aware that just like you, there are Pakistanis who believe that Chandrayan-3's moon landing was faked by Indians? I am sure you agree with them also, right?

Hmmm,Just like me , can't believe any of it . The take off thrust in 69 blew the flag over but the landing thrust didn't kick up enough dust to cover the feet on the damn thing , I'm not saying they lied about all of it , but there is no doubt they lied about some of it to this day . And if they will lie about any of it ,,, all they made me believe is , They don't care a bit to lie.

You are naive.😄

No, this documentary is highlighted by incredibly detailed and extensive footage of the work and travels that took place on a soundstage.

🤣🤣 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@@SanolandSanolandYou are pointlessly cynical.

Felix ?

Yep. You are totally "correct" No reason whatsoever to doubt these highly incredulous narratives. None whatsoever. Yep- I totally believe in NASA, even tho they have lied to us SO MANY times. So I just have one simple question to anyone who still believes in the Apollo stories. Question: " How did the footpads of the Apollo 11 LEM get cleaned of the moondust, which would have surely been there after the lunar landing?? Did moon fairies come out with feather dusters to clean them off before the cameras rolled??? Please tell me how. I want to know.

de verdad crees que eso es de verdad? fijate en el minuto 16:10 es una maqueta se puede ver que esta clavado parece chapon y clavos toda esa maqueta esta desnivelada es una broma de mal gusto

lona clavada parece toda arrugada una estupidez

@@BRUSEBEENMA Esto es una recreación de la proeza real, la que me sigue impresionando. Saludos.

@@markdos1538 no se puede salir de la tierra una vez que ya no hay densidad no hay forma de seguir subiendo si no hay densidad contra que se propulciona un motor es imposible solo en la guerra de la galaqxia se puede

@@BRUSEBEENMA Acción y rescción...hasta ahora... Saludos.

Never went.

if the moon is in a vacuum how did it lose the solar heat that has been heating it up for millennia? science

Deluded

If it was more than 50 years ago You watched them, I guess You're not extremely young. Then you must be very fit at your age, hoping you will walk the moon. Stop wasting time, and good luck to you.

@@neilpike6758 There are 3 methods of heat transfer. Conduction and convection do not occur in a vacuum so that leaves the third method. Take care.

It is a shame Apollo 18, 19, and 20 were cancelled. Those would have been bold missions.

@@aemrt5745Schmidt pushed hard for a landing on the far side crater Tsiolkovskiy. Meanwhile on earth, the Space Shuttle was being developed, Skylab was in the works, OPEC was creating oil shortages, and the Vietnam War needed to be paid for. The old saying, “No bucks, no Buck Rogers”, helped to seal the fate of the lunar program.

@@Sherwoody Indeed. Unfortunately large scale space exploration is depended on the changing political tides. Experienced it first hand in my career.

Like a movie yeah 😂😂😂😂

And, they could go to the grocery store, the movie theater, the sports arena, whatever, without being mobbed (like Aldrin and Armstrong always were).

Though as pilots they wanted the "firsts". For example, Apollo 9 was considered a plumb mission even though it never left earth orbit. It was the first chance to fly the LM, the first flying machine designed to only work in space.

If they had continued on, i recon we would have been on mars by the 90s.

@@procta2343The 2090s I presume?

@@executivesteps i would say so now, closet thing we may get in our life time is an orbit around mars, and that's about it.

era todo mentira

Well, Cernan did get in trouble on Apollo 10 for using some blue words on live audio. Had to issue an apology. I think he had that in mind when he says, "Golly!"

Enough brainwashing in schools as is…

Quando?

@@vantuengler1264now. Look up Artemis program. We already launched Artemis 1.

Nah we lost the technology 😂😂😂😂

Wy do i still see pictures of the moon wen they took pictures on the moon,something is fishy,that is not earth

@@shimzamamorobela5085 you definitely have never seen that lmao

​@@shimzamamorobela5085😄😆 😂😂🤣🤣😅

Quando?

I didn’t know they was planning on going back to the moon. I’ve been wondering why Elon Musk hasn’t worked towards that. He has done great things and so far it always seems like he is successful. It will be awesome to land on the moon again.

Hey cody wy do i still see pictures of the moon wen they take pictures,cuz that is not earth,earth is green &waz seen wen they took off frm the moon,something is fishy

@@shimzamamorobela5085 Your education?

@@smeeself Apparently non-existent.

@@rozzgrey801 Apparently, if you mash the keyboard enough, something resembling language just might be created. This was a good example if that cliche.

It's amazing that you believe in space

It’s the best of the three Apollo astronaut autobiographies that I have read.

Cernan was the best moonwalker to speak with (and I've spoken with most of them). That man, I'll tell ya, he could read people better than anybody I've met, and he instantly could tell whether to ramp the conversation up to super-techy engineering talk, or tone it down to casual basics. Somehow, he instantly knew how technical to be (or not to be). I've only met him 3 or 4 times, but, each time was really great. He'd tell my wife exactly the types of things she'd want to hear (more simple stuff), then shift gears and tell me about how the guidance computers worked, then shift gears again and talk about how he felt emotionally while on the moon. The only thing I didn't like was that he kept bringing up his religion (and his religious experiences while on the moon) every time I'd talk with him. That's about the only thing he ever misread about, because I could have lived without those little segments of conversation. But, the rest... pure perfection. Another thing I learned was never to make heroes of anybody. I mean, not that I really ever did. But, like I tell my kids, just judge people on the stuff you know. If you are a Michael Jordan fan (or any other sports person), fine, but don't admire him for who he is as a person, just admire his abilities on the basketball court. And, if you admire an astronaut, just admire him for his accomplishments in space, not because of who he is as a person. Not that Cernan is really bad or anything, but, there are some aspects of his personality that are very "human" (that I won't get into), and it's best to stick with admiring as the astronaut he is (er, was), and not necessarily judge anything (good or bad) outside of that topic.

@@rockethead7 Cool account, thanks for sharing. Great that you met him on several occasions. I never met him. Was born in 68 so too young to remember Apollo 10 and 17. I remember watching him in the broadcast booth during the first Shuttle launch.

@@rockethead7Man, I went to SpaceFest the year after Cernan died and the guy running the booth that sells photos for autographs started talking to me about him and how Cernan liked to get people together for golf at such events (which were often held near golf courses). And then he asked me if I had ever met Cernan, and I said no. The guy looked genuinely sad for me that I would never get to experience Cernan in person.

Its all fake man. Look into it.

We agree and happy you appreciated it.

The ones in your head?

@@ArKritz84 Lol... you know nothing do you!

@@CT2507 how did you get that idea? There's a lot of weird stuff rattling around up in your brainy bits, isn't there?

@@ArKritz84 From photos fool. Search for them. Not all have been deleted from the net. You can still find a couple of them.

@@CT2507 Your claim is completely based on imagination and poor understanding what you see in the photos.

I can't believe that the moon they're drilling holes on the moon

so what are you saying .. the moon is flat...?

Moon is plasma , Earth is flat 💯 ​@@KPL400 FLAT

Good gods, do you REALLY not understand photographic perspective? Really? You're not aware that shadows converge? Dewdrop, it's the same as if you squat down between two train tracks and take a photo. It looks like the two train tracks are converging, right? It looks like there's no way a train could ever roll down those tracks, because the left track is converging toward the right, and the right one is converging toward the left. Yet, you know darned well that if you took the photo from above, the two tracks are parallel. Well, same thing goes in that photo you're talking about, dewdrop. The shadows converge. That's what they're supposed to do. If they didn't then that means that the light source was inside the camera, not 93 million miles away. You have pointed out a very good photo that confirms the single light source that's extremely far away. But, somehow, you managed to believe that the shadows shouldn't converge?

Go take any photo with the sun behind you, dewdrop, and look at what the shadows do. Or, if you're too lazy, "converging shadows" (Google is your friend), and look at the images. Sheeeeessssshhhh.

@@rockethead7My answer to your first question is - no - I'm not familiar with photography aspects, as well as with most other disciplines. I specialze in something completely else as most of the people, except some daVincis who are capable to absorb multidiscipline knowledge. I'm not believer of anything - religious or not religious meaning. I prefer to know. So, if I don't know something, I'm asking question, then I'm thankful for answers.

Jodrell Bank here in the UK observed . I have no idea what has happened to our education system?….we can’t even repair the roads…

@@toucheturtle3840 Not just the lack of education it’s the laziness.

@@stephenpage-murray7226 virtual reality

Ony byly ztraceny úmyslně, protože to byly jen simulace a animace.

​@@NakolezestodolyYour tin foil hat is on too tight.

We don't have supersonic passenger jets anymore either. Do you have s point?

Engineers were so amazing that when they passed they took that knowledge with them. 😂

@@smeeselfis this the only line you can type in English?

🤣...FFS ITS CG👁....🎯🤺🤬TS

@@amarshmuseconcepta6197In 1972? Yeah, sure kid. 🤣🤡

Intersting tech with the field scan video cameras. In 1972, color video cameras were massive. They figured out how to make it light by using a black and white camera that shot three images thru primary color filters and interlaced them to make a video frame. Works well, but it does cause color artifacts called the "Harris Shutter Effect" when objects move between images in each frame. This is why the LM liftoff images have the camera artifact colorful sparks.

@@aemrt5745 😳

Well, it stuck for a while. But, yeah, then they needed to replace the tape with clamps.

Next time they'll have Gorilla Tape.

And what did we learn about duct tape from Apollo 13?

@@You.Tube.Sucks. That you can attach a square container of lithium hydroxide to a suit hose by using duck-tape, of course!

​@@You.Tube.Sucks.They learned how to fit a square peg in a round hole!

"how did they get the massive weight of batteries to the Moon?" By using rockets. But, note: the batteries weren't like any batteries you use in your car or home. They were ridiculously expensive silver-zinc batteries that costed something like $50,000 each (and each lander had an array of them). That's about $400,000 (per battery) in today's dollars. They used 6 of them per lander in the earlier missions, and 7 of them per lander in the later missions (because, as you pointed out, the later missions lasted longer). They were very chemically stable and packed a lot of energy into a smaller weight than conventional batteries. But, the kicker is that they were not rechargeable. "and how did they get three days out of those batteries?" By having a bunch of them. "solar power would not be enough for what they did." They contemplated solar panels early in the design phase. But, that was abandoned because solar panels back in those days were too fragile, and likely wouldn't survive the very harsh shaking and vibrating of a Saturn V liftoff. And, it was too risky to stake their entire mission on something that fragile. The only use of solar panels for any of the Apollo lunar missions was for Apollo 11's surface experiment package. And, it quit working after 3 weeks. So, from then on, they used nuclear powered isotopic generators for that type of equipment. It runs on the Peltier effect. "It's taken until 2023 for a Tesla to get about 300 miles on a single charge, the batteries also weigh 1200pounds." Well, Tesla is welcome to use a bank of silver-zinc batteries, like Apollo's, if they want. It'll give them a much longer range because those batteries hold a heck of a lot more charge than lithium ion batteries. But, somehow, I doubt the Tesla buyers will want to spend a few million dollars every time the battery runs out, because, as I explained, those Apollo batteries couldn't be recharged. They were one-time-use only. For cars, I think people want cheaper batteries, and ones that can be charged daily.

@@rockethead7 LIAR MUST SUFFER , PAIN AND BURNED IN DARKNESS FOREVER...

@@yoskarokuto3553 I am genuinely sorry that you are suffering but it is good to admit that you are a liar. It is the first step in recovery. Take care.

I think they took the energizer bunny with them.

Conspiracy?

1) each other, or the GCTA. 2) the Lunar Roving Vehicle was actually folded up in the Quadrant 1 bay of the Lunar Module on the J-missions (Apollo 15-17). There is footage of them deploying it on Apollo 15. 3) looks can be deceiving, but why would they want to replicate anything?

Cinema goofs: the Earth is supposed to be much bigger from the moon

Ray wy do i stil see the pictures of the moon wen they took pictures on the moon,something is fishy,al the way frm afrika,i would hv loved to cum houston taxes,the is wall unit for poor people,al de way frm Afrika

The largest mass extinction of life on Earth was caused by 100,000s of years of continuous volcanic eruptions (Deccan Traps). The dinosaurs and many other species died due to climate changes caused by changes due to a meteorite impact.

Got it

Indeed. Incredible effort.

It's a credit to them, at least they gave it a good try.

Like a muh fuggin skeleton in the desert baby

I hope they leave it alone. It would be shame to ruin the sites.

There's nothing there. They never went. Sorry!

@@coolnamebro whatever moron there is tons and tons of proof and you choose to deny it all. Literally an explanation for every component involved and hundreds of thousands who worked on the project. But I know you don’t care and we lied about going not just once but multiple times we even faked Apollo 13 disaster just for the hell of it right? Lol

@@coolnamebro sooo much confidence with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Fantastic movie set 😂😂

Yes. Capable of making amazing scenerys in studio.

Looking forward to Artemis and modern tech HD video. Should be awesome!

​@@cuolemaIdiot

That’s why the cant send humans anymore cause they lost the technology 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

There's a link to part two in the description.

There are some pretty good writeups about the orange soil. It ends up that the color was "just" glass mixed in with the lunar dust. It wasn't the miracle they were hoping for. But, all information is good information, so, yeah, they have some pretty good scientific papers on it that you can read.

@@tallSycamore At the end of part two they are just about to reveal that the whole thing was a ,,,, That's where it cut off.

The Apollo program was VERY expensive. The Soviets couldn't match the $$$ it took to do it, and once the landings were successful the Public got bored with it. So they shut it down. All these years later we are still using Chemical rockets to get into space. Yawn.

@@johnadams5489 you have a better idea for getting to space without using chemicals? lol

Because you really know a lot about aerospace engineering.

🤣 *NO!* FAF AS PER.....

​@@rockethead7OK Captain 🚀🍆HEAD....🤣

Freeman i still seee pictures of the moon wen they took pictures,that is not earth,is green&seen wen they took off frm the moon

@@shimzamamorobela5085 what?

@@shimzamamorobela5085 1/10 for spelling and punctuation, could do better, see me after class.

That was Apollo 15, not Apollo 17.

Good point about the suits. There is a just hot off the press GAO report that sites space suit development as one the the potential show stoppers for the Artemis III Mission.

My guess is they’re buzzing with adrenaline and excitement, almost to the point that they’ve lost their sense of danger. You can really hear the excitement in their voices when they first entered the luna orbit. Can’t say I blame them though, what an experience!

These are mainly hardened folks just built for this. They don't let all the small things (that could be catastrophic) get to them. If they did half the missions would be aborted due to anxiety caused by overthinking. Lots of things we do in our world are actually pretty dangerous, but if you don't overthink them the risks are greatly minimized.

The earlier moonwalks were far shorter, less ambitious in scope, and the astronauts much more careful with the suits and other equipment because they didn't know how well things would hold up in that environment. Apollo 11's "contingency" plans for a quick exit if need be were a good example. With each mission they got more comfortable with the technology, more bold in their actions, and less formal in their behavior during the EVA's. By Apollo 17 the moon walkers were downright playful and giddy. In other words, going to the moon had became more routine, which is part of the reason Apollo 18 - 20 were cancelled. We'd been there, done that, it had become routine, taxpayers were losing interest and questioning why we were spending the money to keep going back.

Yes, the astronauts had radios.

It’s all fake ffs

Ed Fendell.

@@rockethead7 A question that you may be able to answer. Is Ed Fendell still alive? I have Googled without success. Take care.

@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth He was active on social media a couple of years ago. I haven't checked lately. But, ok, I'll start looking.

@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth He commented on social media 8 months ago.

@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Yup, looks like he's still alive. His wife died last week, and there are bunches of posts online sending condolences to Ed (which they wouldn't do if he had also died).

There is a goddamn video of it being deployed ,on the moon🤦‍♂️ Is your Google broken?

Yes my Google broke while I was on the internet thingy. My repair tech will try to repair it today. Thanks for your help!

@@scootermacarthy5990 The rover was carried in the empty quadrant 1 bay of the lunar module’s descent stage. It was deployed using a system of pulleys and braked reels using ropes and cloth tapes. The rover was folded and stored in the bay with the underside of the chassis facing out. One astronaut would climb the egress ladder on the LM and release the rover, which would then be slowly tilted out by the second astronaut on the ground through the use of reels and tapes. As the rover was let down from the bay, most of the deployment was automatic. The rear wheels folded out and locked in place. When they touched the ground, the front of the rover could be unfolded, the wheels deployed, and the entire frame let down to the surface by pulleys. The rover components locked into place upon opening. Cabling, pins, and tripods would then be removed, and the seats and footrests raised. After switching on all the electronics, the vehicle was ready to back away from the LM. There are illustrations on pages 135/136 in the Haynes Apollo manual published in 2019, which show how the rover was folded up and stored and on page 199 a diagramme which shows how it was deployed on the surface.

It was stored in a warehouse and moved onto the movie set for filming. Use your brain

Back then there was a Rover dealership on the moon, so they just bought one and sold it to the Martians before they left. The Martians were advanced, they converted it so that it could run on cheese.

Your mistaking this documentary for Bollywood

How I wish I could travel to the moon too like these men….Congrats guys👍👍👍

Both Soviet orbital probes and the Indian moon mission have confirmed the remnants of the LEM on the moon. Not to mention the laser reflectors placed there.

Way to many questions to ask

@@user-sb6uf1pk9tThe best images (by far) of the lunar surface were taken by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter launched in 2009. They clearly showed the disturbed trails in the regolith as the astronauts walked on the Moon along with their equipment.

Which exact technology are you talking about? Don't just say "technology" as if it's supposed to mean something. Name the specific technology you think they lacked. Then, explain why none of the thousands of engineers working on that particular technology ever realized they failed so badly to make the technology actually work. Can you?

@@rockethead7 if you still cannot understand what i am talking about, then it's Just a waste of time to Talk to you.

Pffttt. If you can't be more specific than the word "technology," sorry, dewdrop, you don't know what you're talking about.

ALL LIARS WITH MORTAL SIN WILL NEVER GET TO HEAVEN , THEY MUST SUFFER PAIN AND BURNED IN DARKNESS FOR ETERNITY !

What that's not true?

Wow kannada😅

I agree he was one of the better actors.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 - Your loss. If you want to live in a world of willful ignorance, go ahead. But how you believe something you can't back up with any good evidence is beyond me. I guess science isn't your thing. Try religion.

@@renejean2523 Now, now Rene. Dingus has a point. He was a better actor, when he did all those docos afterwards - In the Shadow of the Moon, my favorite, he did a great acting job there. It was articulate and genuine, almost as good as his piloting and test piloting skills, less better than his astronautic skills as they got him to the moon and back and certainly his moon exploration ability was top notch.

Blech @ Gene. He's so corny and bland. Michael Collins all day long, baby! Grissom if we've choosing skill, but Collins if we're choosing personality. Dude's a riot! 😂

@@ThisHandleFeatureIsStupid - I agree about Collins. He was a hoot. His book is by far the best of any space person I've read. I suppose I'm swayed by Cernan's intense and more comprehensive mission. The length of time on the moon and his relationship with Harrison Schmitt while there. Also, his first words soon after landing were, "Incredible. Absolutely incredible. ... The most epic moment of my life." Which I've always thought was pretty cool.

Yup, and it wasn't even footage from Apollo 17. They borrowed the CDR shot from Apollo 15 at 47:52. And, I'd have to go through the videos to be certain, but, I think the rest of the shots are from Apollo 16. That's why these documentary videos are difficult to watch if you want 100% accuracy. The editors often borrow footage, just in the interest of relaying the spirit of what's going on, not necessarily meant to be taken as exactly correct. As far as I'm aware (and I'm willing to be wrong), there is no Apollo 17 footage of riding the rover.

@@rockethead7 Very interesting, thanks.

@@rockethead7 Interesting note as well - The audio when Apollo 17 clears the launch tower, and Gene says, "There goes the tower. Oooo there she goes!", is from when the launch escape tower was jettisoned just after skirt-sep.

@@rockethead7 You are wrong. This is from Apollo 17 with Gene Cernan talking about the broken fender they fixed on the LRV.

@@ohlalaale The audio is from Apollo 17. But, the video footage at the 48 minute mark was borrowed from other missions, just as I said.

The lunar roving vehicle was folded up in the quadrant 1 bay of the lunar lander's descent stage on Apollo 15-17. The deployment of it was recorded and broadcast live at least on Apollo 15.

@@ArKritz84 where is the link? Have never seen that film

@@thetruthnothingelse5033 search for “LRV deployment” for some clips and also animations, or “apollo 15 eva 1” if you want to see it more in context.

Where broadcasted

@@thetruthnothingelse5033 it was broadcast live at the time, and then recorded. The videos you'll find are, in one form or another, sourced from those recordings.