Same thanks!

Thrillseeker has the best review imo.

Glad it was helpful!

​@@dtz1000 I like thrillseekers review but i think adam savage tested's review is the best one hands down. Waiting on bradley to release his 1 month review

@@simpl3lang The Adam savage tested review hardly mentioned the FOV, which I found very odd.

@@dtz1000 i know he mentioned it...just ddnt go deep on it. And its talked about by everyone.

I appreciate that thank you - and yep I think most people feel a similar way about it

That’s my main focus as well - as a VR creator filmmaker. I want a bunch of reviews focused on this angle so I’ll look forward to yours

@@user-hg3iv5hy3s Thanks! I'll check out your videos too

That's the plan!

I appreciate that!

Glad you enjoyed it

😅

This hits different

You are right. But as tech reviewer, he’s tried a lot of them so it’s different to hear that. It’s also something other tech reviewers have said about the AVP.

If you realized that you can have 20 + resizable floating screens that you can place anywhere. It is more than a first time trying out

@@toututu2993 You can do that with the £499 Quest 3 using Fluid. This is just what I mean, people acting like the AVP is some crazy futuristic tech, which it is, but that's because it's a well executed VR/AR headset, and it's not the only one, just people who aren't clued up in the space don't know that, and this comment demonstrates this perfectly

Same use them every evening for dev... I also have a Quest Pro (bought £500 two weeks ago). XReal type of devices are much better for productivity. The software for XReal is however not good. Closed sourced, not OpenXR compatible (PC VR)...

Plus the Xreal looks like normal sunglasses unless closely inspected. NOT Douchebaggery.

@@389293912True but you still have a cable... I haven't taken to the gym for example to watch something while cycling or other cardio stuff. I'll still look like a dork with sunglasses in there...

😉

Agreed. It still suprises me that there is not much focus on 3D object manipulation.

No I ordered it to my friends house first in US, then reshipped

Oh that’s cool! Small world

It also needs controllers so it can run VR games

@dtz1000 Until Apple released their version of 120Hz, you didn't thinked they can gain 2 hours extra battery usage with just how they used it differently like others (so regular fixed 120Hz).. this is the same for controller, you just didn't saw a better options yet.. by the way it supports controllers, you just doesn't need them, but you can connect any PS5 or Xbox controller, and they will works.

The key reason why Disney working with Apple, but not with other headsets is the closed environment, what make the piracy is significantly harder.. 99 out of 100 will pay properly for the content, but on Android or on another cheaper and more open product at best the 50 out of 100 will pay for it, so no reason for them to open the possibility for free piracy on quality content..

@@TamasKiss-yk4sttheyre just assholes. i have been trying to buy 3d movies and they literally won't take my money. I think its partially a technical limitation because when i rip a quality 3d blu ray its like 30 gigs or so. Most internet connections cant support that kind of bandwidth.

There was a note inside saying it had been opened for inspection by US customs.

So dystopian

Apple banned those types of videos on this headset. So you wasted your money.

You can watch anything on safari

100% plus it is a niche at this point.

Unlike the AVP the Quest 3 is not a complete stand-alone computer, it's a totally different product category! You'd have to carry around a laptop in addition to the Quest 3 in order to compare it to the AVP.

which you can cast a Mac screen to your quest 3.... and use it like an AVP@@ruschein

@@Andy-xd7ng You don't need a Mac to use the AVP!

Others have done this already. The Quest 3 is the better device overall.

@@dtz1000 In what way? Resolution, pass-through from the outside, fewer problems with dizziness, color space, computing power etc.

Oh true

20 plus resizable floating screens that you can place anywhere is something that Iphone and Ipad can do???

@@toututu2993 No but it's not something that I need either

I thought the same, but then quickly realized, we just spent in upwards of $5k, including accessories, why be cheap now and purchase something inadequate not only in protection but fit as well. Not to mention we did also get a random VR case online, the quality and craftsmanship are night and day… It’s a bit like buying a Ducati, then getting a cheap 50£ helmet… 🤔

@@superzero4250 not same, I been apple enthusiast almost 20yrs (macs, macbook air, macbook pro, ipad pro, iphone pro, air pods pro, homepods & apple tv but their prices are 🐂💩, especially on accessories (almost pure profit)

who said 3rd party bags would be inadequate? it’s just a bag lol im sure there will be 3rd parties that will make properly fitting bags/cases with some good protection just don’t look at the dirt cheap ones

@@superzero4250^

"inadequate"??? @@superzero4250

Try the XReal glasses maybe

@@AlexDubois like their concept but not quite good enough yet but getting there, maybe next generation

Ah you got me! Apart from XReal isn't owned by Amazon to my knowledge. It's also 1/7 the price and does some of what the Vision Pro can do. Also - have you seen how many favourable reviews of Apple tech I do!?

Hah yes I think so

What have you been using the AVP for mostly?

The same functionality is a bit harsh, the max 2K resolution 2D movie with only stereo audio is deffinitly the same quality like the 4K resolution 3D movie with spatial audio (about the same like the 7.1 sound). Just the initial displays are so far from any other (2200x2000 for Quest 3 is 4,4million pixrls per eyes, about 9 million pixels in total, but the Vision Pro has 23 million pixels, about 2,5x more). Same for the sounds, simple 2 way stereo vs 7.1 sound system.. you can't really say that they are about the same. And based on their current video capability the Vision Pro already miles ahead, don't forget you are comparing a 3rd gen with 1st gen, even the Vision Pro 3 will get at least that amount of apps like the Quest currently can offer.. but for better quality and more powerfull performance on Quest, it's nit enough just a few years of OS update, but the Vision Pro still can evolve just with OS updates a lot, plus with more and more apps.

Definitely Dyson 😅

Just because you know how doesn’t make it finicky

@@ryanw8664 It comes with instructions that ZERO people read, save for us… 🤔

Hah fair enough

😂

A wearable computer with high-fidelity passthrough gives you the freedom to use your hands and eyes unobstructed. You can't get that experience with an tablet or phone. There are obvious limitations now, but the potential is there

@@fosterslover problem is unless you have $4000 cash to blow (if you do great for ya) or developer to make money, it not worth buying it for the potential of future generations of device, yes it’s a glimpse of future but that’s it right now

@@c.daubz.5386 Yep, the steep price is one of the current limitations