Are Electric Cars REALLY Better for the Environment?

  Переглядів 2,834,692

Donut

Donut

День тому

Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to keeps.com/wheelhouse50 to get 50% off your first order of hair loss treatment.
We hear it all the time: “Electric cars are better for the planet”. Statements like that have been the foundation of electric car builders like Tesla for over a decade. But is it true? Join Nolan and take a deep dive into the manufacturing process, and see just how much energy goes into building a car. We’re gonna find out if electric rides are better for the Earth once and for all.
Compare Electric Cars and Gasoline Cars emissions: Climobil App
Some of our best videos ever are coming out soon, stay tuned so you won't miss a thing!
►Subscribe here: bit.ly/1JQ3qvO
Check out more Donut Media Videos: • Evolution of the Porsc...
Want a Donut shirt or sticker? Visit shop.donut.media/
Like us on Facebook: / donutmedia
Click here if you want to learn more about Donut Media: www.donut.media/
Donut Media is at the center of digital media for the next generation of automotive and motorsports enthusiasts. We are drivers, drifters, and car enthusiasts who love to tell stories.

КОМЕНТАРІ: 18 000
@Donut
@Donut 4 роки тому
Hey guys I felt this was an important video for us to make, and I'm really glad you guys like it. We've covered a lot of different cars on this channel and talked to a lot of owners, and the one thing that unites them all is the desire for MO POWAH BABEH! So no matter how your car makes its power, you're welcome in the Donut community. - Nolan
@jjrestomods
@jjrestomods 4 роки тому
Hi! Do you have any sources that you can share about the amount of CO2 produced when producing an ICE car? Thanks!
@therisensun9277
@therisensun9277 4 роки тому
Hey Donut crew! I was wondering if you guys could cite your sources for more controversial/political videos like this?
@kyle_vr
@kyle_vr 4 роки тому
Looks like a bright future!
@crimsonsr20
@crimsonsr20 4 роки тому
Cool video Nolan. Super informative and maybe now people will know that EV vehicles aren't as clean as they think. That they'll stop being smug and pretending their doo dont stink lol. The one thing that I feel got left out, is where EV vehicles get there energy from. All power plants have their downsides. Solar and wind power isn't as clean as you think it is. Look into it. I don't want to destroy our beautiful planet, but I'm really tired of misinformation about "clean" energy.
@_generation_youth_x28
@_generation_youth_x28 4 роки тому
can i just say they should instead of making new cars, just re fit them with batteries
@Brandonmntoya
@Brandonmntoya 4 роки тому
dude really stood in front of a green screen just so they could make him stand in front of a blue one
@wayedk1040
@wayedk1040 4 роки тому
But look how evenly blue it is
@themechanic6117
@themechanic6117 4 роки тому
I was thinking the same..
@ryanmchardy6242
@ryanmchardy6242 4 роки тому
Uzi Corndog content Brua 😂 lol good point
@ryanmchardy6242
@ryanmchardy6242 4 роки тому
Wayed K there is a fold in the screen on the bottom right it only shows when he puts a shadow on it
@jacksontheenderman1677
@jacksontheenderman1677 4 роки тому
Did you know that blue screens exist
@bryantvaldez9428
@bryantvaldez9428 4 роки тому
"turning gas into noise. Im going to get that tattooed on me someday." may i recommend the lower back area?
@jonasr.3083
@jonasr.3083 4 роки тому
😂😂😂
@jensenpierre1764
@jensenpierre1764 4 роки тому
😆🤣💀
@S42069
@S42069 4 роки тому
And we can all call it a "champ stamp".
@AngelMartinez-tt1hc
@AngelMartinez-tt1hc 4 роки тому
Amazing! Haha
@purujitpradhan3550
@purujitpradhan3550 4 роки тому
Good one... Hahahahaj
@ZeroDamage.
@ZeroDamage. Рік тому
I'd like to see a part B with the end stage of the vehicles. The recycling of the batteries the recycling of the gas motor versiand just would be interesting
@kadrikarakoc807
@kadrikarakoc807 11 місяців тому
you can basically melt an ice engine, and and an ice engine can be used way longer before rendered useless and have to be recycled. so ev probably will lost that comparison.
@orcusdei
@orcusdei 11 місяців тому
@@kadrikarakoc807 nope, for a single reason and that is called math. The recycled battery is used for the NEW car, so you are not putting recycling to the equation of the old car but to the equation of the production of a new car. And since recycling old battery is more environmentaly friendly than mining that shit, the new cars from recycled batteries are way less environmentally friendly than ICE :-) Of course if you throw both cars off the cliff, then obviously EV vehicle will be less environmentally friendly and the whole argument will then be whats worse - old lithium battery in nature or lets say 500 tons of CO2 and poisons in the air.
@DjAled4K
@DjAled4K 11 місяців тому
Recycled burned gas?
@orcusdei
@orcusdei 11 місяців тому
@@DjAled4K That is basically Porsche's solution with eFuel. But for eFuel to be produced, you need a massive sustainable energy powerplants. And that's what's cool with sustainable energy - it's unlimited power. In theory, you can build a massive floating rig stretching 20x20 kms on the ocean covered with solar panels and you can "store" it in the form of H2 which you can use to fuel these cars or use for any combustion needed. No need for batteries. All the power from the solar panels go to electrolytic reaction in the ocean, producing H2 and O2. Negatives? The sea can get a little bit saltier depending how much of water you take out of it in the form of H2 - but hey, the good thing is you will be returing it back in the form of clouds.
@SomeRndomGoose
@SomeRndomGoose 10 місяців тому
@@orcusdei you can't recycle the battery because it has already lost alot of charge
@danielc8818
@danielc8818 8 місяців тому
Excellent breakdown of the pros and cons of EVs. One big issue I see with them is that they’re still not affordable enough for most people even with a tax credit. And on top of that a lot of people don’t have access to charging because they live in an apartment. Someday it’ll get there when the technology matures but not yet.
@mattpierson6100
@mattpierson6100 8 місяців тому
I just bought a used bolt with a fresh battery replacement for 18k. After the 4k I'll get back from the tax rebate, that's only 14k. Very affordable.
@danielc8818
@danielc8818 7 місяців тому
@@mattpierson6100 wow that is a good deal. Hard to get a decent car for that price. How did you find that? Does that price include the new batteries or did you have to pay separate?
@larrybethune3909
@larrybethune3909 7 місяців тому
@@mattpierson6100 And, with the cost of a new battery pack, the car becomes like a bic lighter. Just throw it away and get another one once the pack cacks.
@JSchroederee
@JSchroederee 7 місяців тому
I think the ice market is setting the price trends. The average new car in the US is ~$45,000, and seeing bottom of the market cars on the road is rare. People complain about the prices but still very few buy the budget option.
@danielc8818
@danielc8818 7 місяців тому
@@JSchroederee yeah that may be true but I wouldn’t consider that affordable. I know lots of people finance way more car than they should and blowout their budget with the payment. And I suppose I should also admit that affordable is relative. I bought my Subaru new in 2015 for 26k. Now the same model and trim would be 30k. For my friend affordable meant buying a used Chevy truck for 10k. While for most people in my area affordable means an Altima or a very used old car like an Impala or similar. And you’re right you don’t often see the cheapest new cars on the road, which I guess proves your point about the trends and mine about financing
@stefanczyzewski7157
@stefanczyzewski7157 3 роки тому
I just realised that my friends presentation for school is the exact same, word-for-word, as this video. Lol
@genericjohn972
@genericjohn972 3 роки тому
Lmao, smart man
@hueyrosayaga
@hueyrosayaga 3 роки тому
@@genericjohn972 umm, you may want to read that comment again. I think it means something more than that guy is "just smart"...
@genericjohn972
@genericjohn972 3 роки тому
@@hueyrosayaga I'm pretty sure there isn't more to his comment. Maybe there is and I'm not seeing it, idk
@fatblunt3210
@fatblunt3210 3 роки тому
@@genericjohn972 if he said it word for word doesn't that mean that he copied it ? (Probably)
@genericjohn972
@genericjohn972 3 роки тому
@@fatblunt3210 Ahh, you've failed to see why it was smart of him to do this
@minuschubz
@minuschubz 4 роки тому
Hey Nolan, make the hour long episode, we aren’t busy we’re locked in our houses...
@smundurornmatthiasson7319
@smundurornmatthiasson7319 4 роки тому
Yeah there are more problems with ev's bc when you need to get rid of the batterys they are just sent to an undeveloped country and into landfills and the harmfull stuff in the batteries will ruin the land
@hectortitan2892
@hectortitan2892 4 роки тому
Perhaps an episode of Past Gas on this? Would love to see more on this topic from my favorite car guys. And no Nolan, it doesn't matter that I already heard what you had to say about it here because facts be facts.
@WarriorsPhoto
@WarriorsPhoto 4 роки тому
It's true. Sadly.
@nuclearbaguette6646
@nuclearbaguette6646 4 роки тому
Smae
@junkiejackflash
@junkiejackflash 4 роки тому
@@smundurornmatthiasson7319 that's why we need to just throw them into the ocean. It's a safe and legal thrill, that the marine life love.
@dlzott
@dlzott Рік тому
Why did you calculate the cost of drilling oil but not the mining of coal for power plants or mining of aluminum for wind turbines or processing of silicone for solar panels?
@Sigma_Cat_memes
@Sigma_Cat_memes 2 місяці тому
thank you! finally someone with a functioning brain
@T-Will-4554
@T-Will-4554 14 днів тому
Because it all works out to about the same lol there's virtually no difference from the mining/extraction, production, life of vehicle, and death of vehicle. With the onslaught of EV's being produced, it's not helping C02 emissions at all.
@dlzott
@dlzott 14 днів тому
@T-Will-4554 did you do the calculation? Cause the math is actually one sided here. Ev is much worse than gasoline cars (which also can be converted to alcohol or natural gas)
@shelbylover1359
@shelbylover1359 Рік тому
Hoping Porsche is successful with their alternate fuel source so we can keep engines for longer
@KingTeobald
@KingTeobald Рік тому
Amen to that
@Balisongs-are-cool
@Balisongs-are-cool Рік тому
Amen
@markfuckerturd5165
@markfuckerturd5165 11 місяців тому
Amen
@ab3040
@ab3040 11 місяців тому
Best way to combate climate change is to keep using the same car for longer Hopefully the fuel cell works
@DarmiGames
@DarmiGames 11 місяців тому
Wonder how will the numbers compare then
@waynealejo8772
@waynealejo8772 4 роки тому
Y’all at Donut need to get this guy a higher frame rate camera.
@PeperMintification
@PeperMintification 4 роки тому
why?
@KuyaArbee
@KuyaArbee 4 роки тому
FActs!!!!! His low FPS camera looks so bad lol
@MyOldNameWasTaken
@MyOldNameWasTaken 4 роки тому
@@PeperMintification it's something console plebs like you will never understand. I bet you think human eyes only work at 15fps.
@harry-of9oz
@harry-of9oz 4 роки тому
@@MyOldNameWasTaken or shit pc plebs
@twingolord
@twingolord 4 роки тому
Wojciekaz or Mac plebs (this is a self burn)
@wellfuckyoumr
@wellfuckyoumr 4 роки тому
“ICE engine” Internal combustion engine engine.
@tamake4492
@tamake4492 4 роки тому
"ASAP as possible!"
@CLK944
@CLK944 4 роки тому
smh my head
@my31and37
@my31and37 4 роки тому
I I noticed noticed that that too too.
@ak19910716
@ak19910716 4 роки тому
Inter-City Express Engine, but it's electric.
@The25soumitra
@The25soumitra 4 роки тому
Ice Ice Baby
@markaingham
@markaingham Рік тому
Lots of pretty good info. I seemed to have missed if you added the impact of the oil extraction and refining to the ICE cars (over all or per gallon). From what I have read, that adds about another 5ish pounds of CO2 per gallon that is burned,... or another 2500 lbs a year. (haven't addressed any oils, or other fluids in ICE or their disposal or production either :))
@marlboroman2393
@marlboroman2393 Рік тому
C02 is good it feeds the plants that then create more oxygen
@anthonymmeek
@anthonymmeek Рік тому
Loved the video and the detail. Would prefer citations from your sources in the video (just a visual reference or in the bio would be good). Thanks for the content
@victorancelmo2549
@victorancelmo2549 4 роки тому
Nolan: Ugh those frickin chargers James: MOW POWA BABEHH
@dlnairways3966
@dlnairways3966 4 роки тому
Victor Ancelmo lol
@coltonwatson4907
@coltonwatson4907 4 роки тому
DLNAIRWAYS 12 they sounded good too
@amer2142
@amer2142 4 роки тому
lol
@campkira
@campkira 4 роки тому
well limitation was we can do..
@eurosonly
@eurosonly 4 роки тому
"I know you're busy" Busy being jobless and just watching youtube all day long.
@Xsonic378X
@Xsonic378X 4 роки тому
eurosonly I got you up to 69 nice
@salvadorvazquez7291
@salvadorvazquez7291 4 роки тому
@@Xsonic378X Hop in we're gonna go find who asked
@GrandTonka
@GrandTonka 4 роки тому
@@salvadorvazquez7291 I did. Any problem?
@RealEvo1st
@RealEvo1st 4 роки тому
Salvador Vazquez who tf said you could talk?
@salvadorvazquez7291
@salvadorvazquez7291 4 роки тому
@@RealEvo1st "I did. Any Problem?"
@forwardfaith
@forwardfaith Рік тому
Well done. A couple of things to add...companies like Redwood Materials are recyling over 90% of battery materials today. Also, LPF chemistry batteries are becoming more popular. They use lithium but not cobalt, which addresses the concern about child labor for at least that metal.
@eSstonY99
@eSstonY99 Рік тому
Don't worry child labor is prevalent on a multitude of other global industries... Which might not be so comforting to know
@lemmyspeaks
@lemmyspeaks 11 місяців тому
The child labor was for the lithium and the cobalt 😂😂😂
@diegocarrillo2360
@diegocarrillo2360 10 місяців тому
I think you mean "LFP" right?
@deydraniadiancecht8298
@deydraniadiancecht8298 8 місяців тому
Cobalt is a byproduct of mining nickel so they're still using those same mines, polluting, and exploiting children. So even if they stop using Cobalt, they're using nickel.
@a3dr2
@a3dr2 7 місяців тому
@@lemmyspeaks Child labour does not depend on the type of industry so, by fact, the less materials we use the better. Environmentaly and for child labour also.
@davidcolson1900
@davidcolson1900 Рік тому
Great video man! One thing we have to consider here is that EV production technology is still in it's infancy. The process will get more efficient as the economy of scale gets larger. Also, our power grid is something that will get better over time also. On the other hand, you can't just take oil out of the air and put it back in the ground. Once the genie is out of the bottle, it's stuck in the carbon cycle.
@spark300c
@spark300c Рік тому
well you can. You grow stuff and bury it. think of all the paper waste we are burying in land fills.
@gregorsamsa1364
@gregorsamsa1364 Рік тому
One of the dumbest and most common arguments I see is "the power grid can't handle 100% EV's. Checkmate, hippies. Hurr durr." As if the current grid is this static thing that will be as it is for all of time
@w4tt322
@w4tt322 Рік тому
The power grid where I live, isn't going to be better. It's simple, most roads are gravel and the ussr still exists on maps were I went to school at. So electric cars? Really? Maybe in the city but everywhere else. Nope.
@josiahfugal5407
@josiahfugal5407 Рік тому
I'd like to mention that hydrocarbons are also cleaning up. Unknown to many people, the introduction of fracking has significantly reduced the amount of emissions attributed to the USA. There are plenty of startup research companies looking into making hydrocarbons with carbon harvested from the atmosphere, either biologically or chemically. Having your fuel as a relatively inert liquid which is easy to transport and requires specific conditions to ignite, let alone explode, is pretty beneficial. Having your power plant also produce heat is very good in harshly cold environments, not to mention that basically, as long as you can get the engine turning and the fuel isn't frozen, you can start an ICE. Electric batteries, on the other hand, do not fare well at all once you are well below freezing. EVs are inherently heavier too, putting more stress on brakes, tires and roads. I believe repaving highways is not only a big inconvenience and expense for travelers and taxpayers, but involves plenty of emissions as well. I would place my bet on cleaner oil, not electric vehicles for all these reasons and more. Just because newer tech exists doesn't mean the old is bad. We still use steam turbines all over the place in power generation, even if the heat comes from a nuclear reactor. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Oh yeah, one more thing: Different cars will not make American cities any more pleasant to live in. The solution is fewer cars, and better public transportation. Make downtown cities walkable again.
@MovingUp7
@MovingUp7 Рік тому
I am a home builder and we have been putting higher amperage service panels in single-family homes to allow for the use of ev's in the future.
@anangrymanatee8830
@anangrymanatee8830 4 роки тому
Nolan: “that’s if they drive the national average of 11,800 miles per year.” Me: laughs and cries in 30k plus a year...
@DraconicWasTaken
@DraconicWasTaken 4 роки тому
Laughs in 47kmi/yr
@frisbe9279
@frisbe9279 4 роки тому
You're a homosexual
@thatonegamer9547
@thatonegamer9547 4 роки тому
I have yet to meet someone that does less than 25k a year
@anangrymanatee8830
@anangrymanatee8830 4 роки тому
Draconic that’s literally the same as 30k in miles...but go off.
@DraconicWasTaken
@DraconicWasTaken 4 роки тому
@@anangrymanatee8830 47 k(thousand) miles per year
@skyty0
@skyty0 4 роки тому
0:02 damn it sounded like Nolan was about to spit some fire for a second there
@niko4628
@niko4628 4 роки тому
Everytime it blows my mind These UKposts comments out of line.
@zamin_ali
@zamin_ali Рік тому
A subject you did not cover in this video was the lifespan of an EV battery versus the lifespan of an internal combustion engine.
@katokianimation
@katokianimation 11 місяців тому
Also what is more green, do something with retired batteries or do something with a huge piece of metal?
@FinesseBTW
@FinesseBTW Рік тому
Watching this 2 years later and I have a few comments: I think you did a really good job looking at this from an unbiased perspective, however I think you missed out on a couple important points. 1. The batteries on EVs wear out. These batteries will need to get replaced multiple times throughout the life of an EV. Judging by the fact that the majority of EV emissions come from the battery manufacturing process, I feel like accounting for this would change the numbers a lot. These batteries don't last nearly as long as reliable gasoline engines, which can run for hundreds of thousands of miles with no issues. 2. The power grid concern you denoted as a myth actually has a lot of merit. There was a recent heatwave in California. Because of this,home owners tend to use more electricity on air conditioning. This alone was enough for the state of California to request their residents not to charge their EVs because they couldn't provide enough power to do so. They also requested residents to set their thermostats to 78 degrees or higher in order to conserve power. This is ridiculously hot and not at all a reasonable request.
@notDestroyer
@notDestroyer Рік тому
I was going to point out the same thing with the electric grid downing/restrictions in CA! A lot more work would have to be done to prepare the electric grids for electric cars.
@ChristineTurner
@ChristineTurner Рік тому
The other thing that wasn't noted was the reduced battery function in colder states or countries like Canada, where everything east of British Columbia is a frozen tundra for 4-5 months of the year. That harsh weather is going to kill the battery life & efficiency and cause even more frequent replacement, and that's just based on basic use of the vehicle, not counting the fact that you NEED the heat on and that's going to burn more battery power. So many factors to consider...
@ricksilvas855
@ricksilvas855 Рік тому
That's a great point but there have never been a shut down of the power grid in California and probably never will be. They do warn there might be certain areas that get shut down for a while but it's not the like the entire grid would ever be shut down. To this day California had never had the grind shut down as mass. Texas on the other hand is another can of worms.
@notDestroyer
@notDestroyer Рік тому
@@ricksilvas855 not a total blackout but a brownout warning for 10 straight days that prohibited normal life and transportation for those with EVs
@ricksilvas855
@ricksilvas855 Рік тому
@@notDestroyer lol that's not true at all... what city or cites are you talking about? I have not experienced and power outages due to demand ever here in my city.
@guardrailhitter
@guardrailhitter 4 роки тому
Remove both, use horses again
@arctus4272
@arctus4272 4 роки тому
Oh sh-
@KTham-li1fe
@KTham-li1fe 4 роки тому
Horse farts
@ChickenMusiala
@ChickenMusiala 4 роки тому
Ay smart guy buy a horse call him (or her) a Mustang
@guardrailhitter
@guardrailhitter 4 роки тому
@@KTham-li1fe cow farts
@mattiabusi6812
@mattiabusi6812 4 роки тому
You can still have a Mustang lol, only with one HP
@christopherleetrf
@christopherleetrf 4 роки тому
Nolan: those freaking Chargers Also Nolan: nothing matches a V8 turning gas into noise 😂
@djaydeved
@djaydeved 4 роки тому
have you heard of the 671 detroit mate? because the detroit engines are pure heavenly noises
@BuildFly
@BuildFly 4 роки тому
His car is warranted and the excessive noise outside is not. Like how bikinis in public are warranted when you’re wearing them but underwear is not. Warranted. Consent.
@forest6045
@forest6045 4 роки тому
Sounded like a 5.0
@dreygrach
@dreygrach 4 роки тому
Hahaha
@ElectrifiedStud
@ElectrifiedStud 4 роки тому
I think you haven't installed a proper ice (in car entertainment) in your ice car. Ev's can produce any type of noise/muzik, on demand, any volume, etc with an aftermarket kit. All that whilst no emissions to burn your beloved/nonbeloved one's lungs if you please. Plus there's a new segment of aftermarket kits that can be devised just like the good old ice rice cars 😆
@flyingbadger1759
@flyingbadger1759 Рік тому
Funny thing about your electric grid point. Overall the US might be fine but some localities will have issues. CA recently was telling people to refrain from charging their cars to prevent blackouts.
@sinfullv9411
@sinfullv9411 Рік тому
That only mean our power grid is suck and need to be updated. And US is failing behind the rest of the world
@ShapeCZ
@ShapeCZ Рік тому
And you are not intelligent enough to understand that producing gasoline uses a lot of electricity as well?
@F1ve-seveN
@F1ve-seveN 2 місяці тому
9:08 is plain out wrong or misleading. In 2020, a well renowned institute in my country did a complicated calculation for average CO2 emmision per kilometers. They found out that in my country, where 70% of our electricity depends on burning coal and gas, CO2 emission per mileage is only 5~10% better for EVs than Combustion engine cars. Making compensation for larger emission in manufacturing almost impossible (>25years) Where the maintenance for EVs at certain mileage are just over 3x more polluting, making EVs basicallya big ass lie in my country.
@heresjonny4107
@heresjonny4107 4 роки тому
Nolan: I know you're busy *100k views in 2 hours Everyone: Yeah not really that busy
@Renee_R343
@Renee_R343 4 роки тому
Also, partly because it's Nolan, not one of these new guys with no charisma. The dude modding the miata is ok too.
@Connersheckells
@Connersheckells 4 роки тому
Finally, something educational and entertaining to do for school
@xehloh
@xehloh 3 роки тому
Facts
@kuldeepsandhu8057
@kuldeepsandhu8057 3 роки тому
Ya facts
@undertyped1
@undertyped1 3 роки тому
BUT! He hasn't taken into account that the lithium car batteries can be recycled. What is the emissions for a recycled battery for a recycled electric car? hmm?? hmm?? Recycling is in it's infancy along with eletric cars, and they can already recycle 80% of every battery. In the future it will be 20% mining and 80% recycling, so the footprint would be lower from the outset. Who knows the, in the future it could become 100% recycled, and there would be no more mining.
@MrFlame-qe2hv
@MrFlame-qe2hv 3 роки тому
Ikr hair product is a really good idea!!
@KrazyKeith4
@KrazyKeith4 3 роки тому
But MO POWAH BABEH is the most educational thing I've ever learned
@AHVENAN
@AHVENAN Рік тому
No matter which is less damaging to the environment, a brand new EV or a brand new ICE car, I still firmly belive that the MOST enviromental thing you can do as a car owner and driver, is keep an old car running for as long as possible, the production of new cars is responsible for quite a large chunk of the emissions no matter how you spin it!
@opoxious1592
@opoxious1592 10 місяців тому
The new e-fuels in development has all the good characteristics like regular gas. With the difference that these e-fuels do not consists out of any fossil components, and it's also emission free. And the good news is, that any existing car can drive on these e-fuels with just a small adaptation to the engine. This will be the future. It's clear now by a lot of people, dead the electric car is a dead end. This is also the reason why sales are so low. It's also obvious when you look arround you, or in traffic. If you see a parking lot with 100 cars, at best you will be seeing 3 to 4 electric cars. So i'll will be sticking to my own car.
@omegastudios-minecraft1865
@omegastudios-minecraft1865 9 місяців тому
@@opoxious1592the closest thing we have to an e-fuel is hydrogen gas, but the fuel cells are so massive that it leaves barely any space in the actual car. They’re also not very efficient, so you won’t see any car going more than 250 miles on a hydrogen powered engine. Additionally, these cars are very slow, having abysmal acceleration and terrible top speed. EVs on the other hand, do not have any of these flaws. Of course this may change in the future, but as of now EVs are far superior
@opoxious1592
@opoxious1592 9 місяців тому
@@omegastudios-minecraft1865 It's not hydrogen gas. It's a synthetic liquid that is colorless, and the car is filled up just like a regular car. It's like gasoline, but it's not made out of crude oil. So it don't need any special "fuel cells" or anything.
@omegastudios-minecraft1865
@omegastudios-minecraft1865 9 місяців тому
@@opoxious1592 ah cool, I just looked it up. This could be a very nice solution to our carbon emissions, but I’m just worried about the price. Experts say that by 2026 prices will go down to 7.57 dollars per gallon, which is notably much more expensive than gasoline. On the other hand, electric is far cheaper than both gasoline and Porsche’s eFuel. Electric is probably still the way to go, at least for now
@opoxious1592
@opoxious1592 9 місяців тому
@@omegastudios-minecraft1865 The prices will eventually will go down, when they are able to mass produce it on a large scale. So what you say is right, that in the beginning it will be above the avarage price comared to gasoline.
@ajarms86
@ajarms86 Рік тому
Whilst looking into this have you looked at the comparison of the impact of a new EV produced this year versus keeping a 10 or 15 year old ICE on the road - I would imagine (but don't have the figures) keeping a well maintained existing ICE car on the road is far better then the production of a new car
@shaynegadsden
@shaynegadsden Рік тому
That applies to just about all vehicles even ones with pretty average fuel economy, if the enviroment is the primary concern keeping your existing car is better than getting a new one
@starofdavid9919
@starofdavid9919 11 місяців тому
Makes total sense but will interfere with big car makers profits.
@paulogden7417
@paulogden7417 4 місяці тому
Donut’s math: an ICE car puts out 5.2 MT of CO2 per year, an EV 2MT. So 3.2 MT/yr reduction for EV. Now, it takes 9MT of CO2 to produce an electric car. So, if you have your ICE car destroyed and buy a new EV, in three years you have worked off the 9MT of CO2 it took to produce (9/3.2=2.8) and from then on you are producing 60% less CO2 every year (worst case) than your old ICE car. So, buy the new EV. And consider getting one with a smaller battery, such as a Model 3 standard range, as they cost less and have a smaller battery so less CO2 to produce. This means the CO2 break even calculation is even shorter, about 2 years.
@paulogden7417
@paulogden7417 4 місяці тому
@@starofdavid9919wrong, see my other comment with calculations.
@paulogden7417
@paulogden7417 4 місяці тому
@@shaynegadsdenwrong, see my comment with calculations.
@djsercy5879
@djsercy5879 4 роки тому
Nolan: "I know you're busy---" Me: I clicked on this video because the opposite is the case
@Refman42
@Refman42 4 роки тому
Dylan-James Sercy same
@sebastiangrob4813
@sebastiangrob4813 4 роки тому
That is the joke
@nowammies9986
@nowammies9986 4 роки тому
And then was wrong?
@whatisnot1926
@whatisnot1926 4 роки тому
Living in countryside: annoying rooster cuckling Living in city: Dodge chargers ramming the engine
@usa-ye4ob
@usa-ye4ob 4 роки тому
You've not lived in the countryside before have you. People are always speeding down the road on loud as fuck dirt bikes.
@jansen7640
@jansen7640 4 роки тому
@@usa-ye4ob that's not nearly as bad as cars passing by 24/7
@butkusfan23
@butkusfan23 4 роки тому
jansen in some parts of the countryside, its just as bad as living next to a major highway. Yeah, you get moments of quiet, but other times, it seems like every time you want to read a book or take a nap or enjoy the peace and quiet, everyone in the county loads up their 4 wheelers, dirt bikes, and their Blazers/Broncos/Tacomas/Jeeps/Subarus/Trackers that ALWAYS seem to have an exhaust that needs to be fixed, or they took the mufflers off of completely because the damn thing isn’t street legal anyway, and head over to your stretch of the woods or your part of the dirt road to get loud and stupid. It gets old. And if they are on public property or public roads while they do it, cops do nothing about it, so you just have to live with it.
@jansen7640
@jansen7640 4 роки тому
@@butkusfan23 oh I get it. Well in the Netherlands everything that's sort of fun is illegal so we can't do anything like driving motorbikes four wheelers etc. In the woods without getting the cops called. So it's really quiet here.
@Acrich1000
@Acrich1000 4 роки тому
@@jansen7640 well here's the deal its illegal here too but that's what makes it fun and our cops are very lazy here if you're out in the country you're gonna get caught by a sheriff and they'll probably just want a beer.
@Daniel-tf1vc
@Daniel-tf1vc Рік тому
Hey Donut Media. I’m doing research for this exact topic for school, and was just wondering if I you had the sources that you used for your information?
@kinster02
@kinster02 Рік тому
I think he needs to redo myth #2 because Cali and Texas are having grid problems to the point that, they are telling you not to charge your car.
@codyerickson3550
@codyerickson3550 Рік тому
I literally said “Bullshit” out loud when he said that. There’s no fucking way our power grid could support that many EV’s. We’d have regular rolling blackouts. Especially since there is absolutely ZERO plans in order to update or enforce this country’s power grids.
@antontaylor4530
@antontaylor4530 Рік тому
@@codyerickson3550 Look, don't be so afraid of EV's. The more EV's in the world, the better. Gasoline is in short supply, whereas minivan owners are not. If every non-petrolhead gets an EV, it simply means more go juice is left for those of us who deserve it, instead of being wasted taking timmy to violin practice or going to buy a vegan mochilatewhatever. Save real fuel for real car drivers. Petrol for petrolheads. EV's for everyone else. That'll result in massively cheaper *real* fuel. I look forward to a time when a V8 costs the same to run as a small 4 cylinder does today. As for whether or not the grid could cope, it could. It *TOTALLY* could. EV's are mostly charged at night, when everyone's asleep and the grid is underutilised. Also, what most people don't understand is that refining crude oil requires massive amounts of electrical energy. To refine a single gallon of diesel/gasoline requires about 7Kwh of electricity. Most EV's can go as far on 7Kwh of electricity as a regular car can go on 1 gallon of fuel. So as EV numbers increase, the refineries will use less electricity, lowering stress on the grid, not increasing it (because as stated earlier, most cars are charged at night whereas refineries run through the day and night). A single refinery uses as much electricity as a small city. And does so 24/7. Add vehicle-to-grid (most EV's are capable of this) and it will *add* stability to the grid. No more rolling blackouts, because the EV fleet will act like a nationwide battery backup. No more paying thousands for electricity during emergencies when the utilities screw the pooch.
@omgitswywy
@omgitswywy Рік тому
Came to find this comment, had to pause the video
@haie90
@haie90 Рік тому
but you can't create energy out of non existence, and energy conversion efficiency is way better for electric cars. although I love ICE, their low thermal efficiency is a major downside compared to EV
@haie90
@haie90 Рік тому
@@antontaylor4530 people who says EV are bad doesn't know that thermal efficiency exists, and as a gas powered car enthusiasts, I think people overshadowed evs as being cringe liberal science stuffs
@knutearmstrong5252
@knutearmstrong5252 4 роки тому
8:39 that's a nuclear power plant and the gas coming off the top is just steam. Nuclear reactors are incredibly clean energy.
@boataxe4605
@boataxe4605 4 роки тому
Until it’s time to get rid of the spent fuel.
@knutearmstrong5252
@knutearmstrong5252 4 роки тому
@@boataxe4605 spent fuel is a political issue, not a technical one. Using current reprocessing methods we can separate out the fission products which account for over 99% of the radioactivity but only a few percent of the mass. Those isotopes also have very short half lives and only need to be contained for a few hundred years, not 100,000 years. The rest of the spent fuel can be recycled and burnt again. This means a reactor's waste would produce only a few liters of truly harmful waste which can be buried.
@Martink9191
@Martink9191 4 роки тому
@@boataxe4605 Fun Fact. 95% of spent nuclear fuel is still located in powerplant.
@boataxe4605
@boataxe4605 4 роки тому
Martink9191 Fun fact: Chernobyl is so clean the almost 35 years later people still can’t live there. Another fun fact: Three mile island was only minutes away from suffering the same fate. Fun fact #3 Fukushima.
@Martink9191
@Martink9191 4 роки тому
@KhakiPeach67 Waste fuel is not reactive anymore. It needs 20% to be littlebit dangerous. 80% clean to be used in bombs. anything that is lower than 0,7 is practically useless. Powerplants uses 3-5% enrichment to produce electricitycy. What happened in chernoble, wherent actual nuclear explosion. it was steam explosion, that damaged the reactor core. Well. i put it that way. Put a sealed cettle onto fire. If temperature increases presure inside increases also. In one point cettle can't hold it anymore and it "explodes". Very same happened in chenoble. To mutch pushing rods made boiling prodcedure extremly fast. "cettle" could'nt stand the inside presure and blowed up. How reaction works? Wel it needs water... Basically you have nuclear fuel. it is harmeles. Add some water and it starts to react. That was the main problem in chernoble. If nuclear fuel would made its way to ground water, extremly fast reaction would have been formed.
@dman9728
@dman9728 4 роки тому
Imagine this was the first Donut video someone ever watched and saw a shirtless guy saying ‘mow pawa babhe’ they would have no idea 😂
@ianferreiraian
@ianferreiraian 4 роки тому
That's me right now.
@thomasgeorge5106
@thomasgeorge5106 4 роки тому
mind explaining it??
@falcon1378
@falcon1378 4 роки тому
@@thomasgeorge5106 basically more horsepower/stronger turbocharger or a bigger engine (like the 6 pack) and anything that powers up the livelihood of a car has more power or moh powah babah.
@yo_utub-e
@yo_utub-e 4 роки тому
thats me xD
@yo_utub-e
@yo_utub-e 4 роки тому
@@falcon1378 Oh lol
@ArneyO7
@ArneyO7 11 місяців тому
I work at dams in the pacific northwest. Saw a tesla plugged into a welding receptacle on the down stream side. Doesn't get cleaner than that haha
@FRANANGELICOONA
@FRANANGELICOONA 8 місяців тому
Whats the efficiency of the energy transfer from power plant to car battery? I heard its 50%.
@kamillebidan7129
@kamillebidan7129 4 роки тому
Day 1: Asking donut media to do an up to speed for Toyota Century.
@yaboierikwithak2179
@yaboierikwithak2179 4 роки тому
William Sampson Ayy that’s what I was gonna say
@user-zc2hz3yj2k
@user-zc2hz3yj2k 4 роки тому
What about za Toyota Crown?
@Louis8257
@Louis8257 4 роки тому
or a B2B
@rossneyman7781
@rossneyman7781 4 роки тому
Yeah but james already said you have to be more creative than asking every day for it since someone did it for the lexus episode
@giaopx
@giaopx 4 роки тому
@@user-zc2hz3yj2k agree, i have a toyota crown and it is awsome
@alicia03
@alicia03 2 роки тому
Can we give this man props for how he explains things. He makes it so easy to understand what he’s talking about!
@ayoungtricknamedjim5498
@ayoungtricknamedjim5498 2 роки тому
He deliberately omitted the part where there are massive factories all over the world that have to recycle the batteries. If he was good and unbiased at explaining this topic, he would have explained the *massive* amounts of cO2 that those facilities produce. The omission of that information turns this video into nothing but propaganda. Also, the replacement of the battery packs in the cars. EVs have a much longer lifespan than ICE vehicles due to having far fewer moving parts, so people replace the battery packs in their vehicles instead of buying a new car when the batteries no longer hold an acceptable charge. This means that the cO2 production of the batteries is already at least double per BEV than what he's claiming.
@DH-gp3gp
@DH-gp3gp 2 роки тому
@@ayoungtricknamedjim5498 Yes, he never covered what happens to dead batteries and cost of replacing them! My cell phone battery replacement is expensive so I can’t imagine how much it would cost for a car.
@toomuchgyal9083
@toomuchgyal9083 2 роки тому
@@DH-gp3gp and your cell phone probably has a bigger carbon footprint than your refrigerator.
@toomuchgyal9083
@toomuchgyal9083 2 роки тому
@@ayoungtricknamedjim5498 and notice how he didn't give a number for the c02 emissions from lithium or cobalt mining? Judt the ethical thought. 17 metric tons for a big EV, plus atleast 2 tons per year? So 37 tons for 10 years? You're getting up there with ice vehicles, and that's not including replacing the battery or from what I here the additional maintenance of EVs, I hear the tires need to be replaced more. And in an electrical world you still need to take into account the emissions from manufacturing solar panels and wind mills, mining for copper or processing recycled copper... I want to do more research on coal emissions vs oil refining. I thought I read that coal is worse, not sure if it takes into account refining of oil or just burning gas. And there is still energy loss in transporting power. Good luck mining lithium, or copper, or anything heavy with an electric power CAT truck. Most likely will have a low range when it comes to hauling or towing heavy material, which means more charging, and therefore more c02 emitted, whether from coal or manufacturing of solar panels, wind mills, hydro power systems. And more solar? = less room for trees and grass that love c02. Not all solar is just on roofs or pavement... edit: and i also read that mining for uranium emits c02, and heating up your home with electricity is tough vs gas, sooo you're probably going to need more juice, therefore more mining and c02 emissions. They say it's just water vapor, but doesn't water vapor heat the earth? And then you're just taking water from resources around you and speeding up that process that's supposedly already happening in our "warm" world. Just like digging for oil and speeding up that process...
@ayoungtricknamedjim5498
@ayoungtricknamedjim5498 2 роки тому
@@toomuchgyal9083 these are the thoughts that are good to ponder. Everyone should be researching this stuff instead of having the EV narrative force-fed and blindly accepting it. One thing I'd mention is that H2O/water vapor actually *cools* the air. Once it reaches a couple of feet from the exhaust pipes, it has a cooling effect :)
@shininio
@shininio 9 місяців тому
Very well researched and present video. Kudos
@fish4716
@fish4716 Рік тому
Well made, very informative!
@sandwichdood6634
@sandwichdood6634 4 роки тому
“ I know you’re busy and ya ain’t got time for that” Thicc boi we all at home rn
@josephjoy6994
@josephjoy6994 4 роки тому
We need sail cars.Sail cars are the future. No powah baby!!!! 😂😂😂
@Jimrlst
@Jimrlst 4 роки тому
Landsurfing is already a thing, so why not bring it to the roads?
@The25soumitra
@The25soumitra 4 роки тому
Raghav Varma You can do Sailouts..😝
@The25soumitra
@The25soumitra 4 роки тому
😂
@bryanlammers384
@bryanlammers384 4 роки тому
BLOW POWAH BABEH
@matthewandrade1893
@matthewandrade1893 4 роки тому
Then for people where wind isn't a thing, they can use urine. Its free we all have it.
@theonlyalan731
@theonlyalan731 7 місяців тому
Wow, things have really changed over the three years since this video was made.
@AlansWoodworking
@AlansWoodworking 6 місяців тому
Haven't they just!
@frederickthesquirrel
@frederickthesquirrel Рік тому
"The power grid could handle it if 25% of cars were electric tomorrow." I'd like to see the source for that, considering that the electric grid in some places already can't handle the current load. Rolling blackouts are common in California, and starting to happen in other states as well.
@UrAvgRetail
@UrAvgRetail Рік тому
The majority of the grid is not anywhere near as strained.
@frederickthesquirrel
@frederickthesquirrel Рік тому
@@UrAvgRetail Yet
@meanmutton
@meanmutton Рік тому
EV charging pulls about as much power as a home A/C unit. You tend to use the A/C units during the day, charge EVs at night. Quite a few companies have incentives for people who only charge their EV at night.
@halnogaies1256
@halnogaies1256 Рік тому
There is a problem with Ca's power grid that involves the lack of funding for its maintenance.
@UrAvgRetail
@UrAvgRetail Рік тому
@@halnogaies1256 California is a fringe case the majority of the USA has much less stress on their grid and could easily handle electric cars. We needed nuclear power in CA but it’s gone now
@_nines8270
@_nines8270 3 роки тому
When do we get nuclear-powered muscle cars
@paulgoogol2652
@paulgoogol2652 3 роки тому
Oh yeah. I want to see the nuclear explosions whenever they crash.
@JasonS42
@JasonS42 3 роки тому
@@paulgoogol2652 Even if those cars had their own nuclear generator in them (more likely they'd be electric and charged by a nuclear grid), they wouldn't explode. They'd melt down. You'd just have a smoldering lump of steal emitting gamma rays for thousands of years! XD Stop being so dramatic!
@kartikeypant4387
@kartikeypant4387 3 роки тому
I'm getting fallout vibes
@jazx7104
@jazx7104 3 роки тому
Fallout timeline... I guess 2254? :D but they are fusion based... you CAN blow em up though!
@DTMPROD.
@DTMPROD. 3 роки тому
@@JasonS42 if ur not joking ill tell ya its a joke
@user-ec6kt2fg7m
@user-ec6kt2fg7m 4 роки тому
People: Co2 emissions; Carbon footprintm child labour Cars: V10 go brrrtrtrttt Nyaaaaooooommmm
@christcarsandcountry6812
@christcarsandcountry6812 4 роки тому
Does your EV sound this good, hippie? *happy carbureted V8 noises*
@timmy9796
@timmy9796 4 роки тому
what?
@CrazyWeeMonkey
@CrazyWeeMonkey 4 роки тому
Old boomers: noo you can't make an SUV get to 60mph in under 3 seconds EVs: EVs go eeeeeeee
@swanauto47
@swanauto47 4 роки тому
V10 is better
@timotiusxxxful
@timotiusxxxful 4 роки тому
haha Cars go vroom vroom
@JoelPlamondon1967
@JoelPlamondon1967 Рік тому
Can you put a link to a graph that shows those numbers? I would love a visual of one Vs the other.
@nicolaistrandet830
@nicolaistrandet830 9 місяців тому
Did you know you also use cobolt in making og gasoline? How much cobalt has been used in arms lifetime vs ev?
@garrettprofancik7311
@garrettprofancik7311 4 роки тому
6:15 props to the editors for making the music perfectly sync with the video it was a satisfying detail lol
@lauchlanstill6677
@lauchlanstill6677 4 роки тому
I watched that 3 times over lol
@blitzsgarage6323
@blitzsgarage6323 2 роки тому
Nice video. I just wanted to add a couple notes for clarification. I work in the utility industry. There are two issues with the power generation and supply for EVs. One is simply we don't have the capacity. I know you said this was incorrect in the video, but the US power grid only has roughly a 10% surplus during peak load. And that surplus is not tangible across the entire grid at any one given time. While it would support a sudden spike in EVs, the grid would be in stretched pretty thin in some areas with high population densities and those areas could experience "brown" or "dirty" power outages. These already occur on occasions when the system is stressed by unusual weather conditions such as those seen in California and New York in the past. There is another related issue. Coal fired or liquefaction plants converted to natural gas are dependent on volume and that volume delivery is directly associated with environmental events. In the middle of the winter, during a severe cold snap, a generation plant my need to dip into the reserve to feed the electrical system, but is unable to because they are not able to get the volume due to the residential customers, high volume and distribution operators drawing down the gas supply before it reaches the power plant. This occurred in the midwest in 2021. The volume of gas available was not enough to supply the demand and the states of Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri and parts of Texas had to cycle scheduled blackouts to get the grid back into a stable state. The generation company was forced to mass purchase natural gas that was in storage in order to meet demand at a much higher cost per mmcf. (We knew some folks in OKC that recieved power bills between $3k and $5k for a single month of power, but luckily president Trump issued a state of emergency that allowed the government to subsidize the cost.) Secondly, your recap didn't take into account the infrastructure itself. Transporting the amount of power needed to supply the move to electrical power has been discussed for years, and no one has a sure fire bullet as to what will be needed, and upgrading the current infrastructure could in itself take decades. It's also not economically feasable to upgrade the grid in one step even if you have a good understanding of the future demand because the cost to meet expected demand far exceeds the amount of money the vast majority of operators are capable to generate. I'm not saying that it is an impossible endeavor, just a lot of guys hacking at calculators in a closet trying to get a decent idea as to how much load they will be expecting, and a heck of a lot of money for infrastructure upgrades. Honestly the current EV infrastructure is not much more than those gravity hand gas pumps you find in third world countries at the moment. Imagine what the electrical grid would be required to handle if every gas station you know of only had charging ports. We're talking in the trillions for infrastructure upgrades when we can't even keep our bridges maintained properly. Then there's the lack of taxes for road use ... Third note. Most of the oil that comes into the country is from Brazil. The reason we import is because Brazil has what we call heavy crude. The crude found in Texas, Oklahoma and even Alaska is a lighter grade that takes less refinement, but doesn't have the value of Brazilian crude which is more suitable for producing a broader range of products per volume. I also found your figures a little high there, but I'm only familiar with onshore wells. Most wells, even frack wells can produce for years with hardly any emissions. More emissions are generated off the coast of California and Florida daily in naturally occurring releases. Things decompose, gas and oil are created. It's a natural process regardless of what the environmentalists want to say. I'm not saying that our dependance is a good thing, but I find a lot of times that these numbers are heavily skewed, or in the case of power generation, white lies to draw new avenues for revenue generation. Clarkson did some research on the creation, processing and shipping of lithium batteries used in the Prius. His findings were that the shipping and environmental impact of creating, shipping and assembly in conjunction with use and eventual disposal, generated an equivalent or higher level of emissions over the life of the vehicle then an equivalent gas powered low emission car. I know this was specific to a certain car, but it's also something that should be considered. Does a battery that's shipped 9k miles by a diesel ship create less pollution than a gas powered VW beetle? I can't answer that question honestly. Forth note. Have you ever looked into how we deal with pollution created from creating solar cells and the disposal of wind turbine blades? It should also be considered, especially turbine blades, since well, we can't recycle them in any way and they are piling up. Hydro power, while the cleanest, really causes numerous other issues with the environment. There is no sure fire way to generate electricity today with minimal environmental impact. Those wave generators are interesting though. Just remember, Newton was right ;) Thinking about combustion engines and electrical cars. A plain old metal oil burner can pretty much be recycled from top to bottom. Many of these new EVs are using exotic materials that can't be simply ground down and remelted. We simply don't have a way to deal with the materials currently. Would going to EVs truly solve our problem? Who creates more emissions, a person that buys a fairly low emission oil burner and drives it 200k miles, or a person that buys a new EV every couple of years? If you want to lesson the impact on the environment then there would need to be a stipulation on how long you would be required to retain that EV or have a buyback program to ensure the vehicle remained in service long enough to meet some desired degree of acceptable pollution. We would also need to formally tax, and tax heavily, the power utilized in the charging process to pay for emergency services, roads and infrastructure. There are also other things that people don't consider what about possible electrical shock for police, fire and EMTs? What about training firefighters to deal with the battery cells and the special equipment they will need. If a battery cell is ruptured it could set off a chain reaction that can't be extinguished for days. Top Gear's Richard Hammonds wreck with the Rimnac is a good example. It burned, self reignited and was extinguished continuously for 5 days. An EV fire is a scary thing and currently there are not enough fire departments with the training and equipment to deal with resin, exotic material and large scale lithium battery fires. At any rate, I think that the video was well put together and thought out. I definitely can't fault you for missed points because this is a massive undertaking that we are forcing into motion. I imagine I'll be long gone before everything is sorted out, but I have found the whole thing intriguing to watch. A good friend once said to me "we are all in it together". As I get older I realize just how correct he was when he said it.
@veronikameyers3436
@veronikameyers3436 2 роки тому
Thank you for your comments! It's great when someone who actually understands the topic can explain their perspective.
@marcoscasado8698
@marcoscasado8698 2 роки тому
FACTS! That's what all these folks doesn't want to understand!
@divad435
@divad435 2 роки тому
All of these issues you raise can be solved though. Just like there were many issues and problems with extracting fossil fules from the earth, we have come leaps and bounds with that. The same can happen with renewables. Just needs more R&D and for big fossil fuel companies to get out of the way and let it happen.
@mrmckle
@mrmckle 2 роки тому
The number of likes under your comment really reflect how narrow-minded most people are. Rather than reading a slightly longer comment which contains valuable information, they ignore it and look for something shorter and easier to read. Always looking for the quick fix won't get us anywhere.
@wasabi_san
@wasabi_san 2 роки тому
Thanks for a good read. I would say that we've come a long way with combustion engine in terms of how we manufacture and recycle its parts. Keep in mind that EV is still at its infancy and given the same amount of time that combustion engine had matured; EV's battery component will find its way to be more efficient and sustainable. Keep using the same technology just because it works is what stifles innovation. Remember there was a thing called the steam engine that came before the combustion engine.
@robertvanderlinden2813
@robertvanderlinden2813 17 днів тому
i know one thing that can save combustion engines, Biofuels, these are way cleaner to make than regular gas and has nearly no impact on poweroutput, and there is stuff out there that can be mixed with fuel to further make combustion more efficient
@BainKail18
@BainKail18 Рік тому
This was super well done! Thanks for doing it 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
@lootingiv4058
@lootingiv4058 Рік тому
except what about the fact that you have to replace the batteries in the evs.... after 1 replacement you are even to a combustion engine lifetime but you will still have to change it more than a few times... which makes it overall worse....
@thevtecguy5551
@thevtecguy5551 4 роки тому
Nolan: *damn charger* Me when I see a charger: *REV IT*
@midnighttc.300coninsta7
@midnighttc.300coninsta7 4 роки тому
Me: SEND IT
@robertparks2933
@robertparks2933 4 роки тому
EXACTLYYYYY!!!!
@LoserSnoozer
@LoserSnoozer 4 роки тому
V6 charger sounds
@waynemeredeth9536
@waynemeredeth9536 3 роки тому
Here in California our power grid can’t keep up with our air conditioners.
@NeverWoken
@NeverWoken 3 роки тому
the irony is that heat is generated in order to provide the power for you to cool down the air. absolutely bonkers.
@Sevenspent
@Sevenspent 3 роки тому
yeah I wonder whats gonna happen in 2035 when California's 14million cars(2019 stats) are EV's in the middle of summer heatwave
@Xeraghusta
@Xeraghusta 3 роки тому
@@Sevenspent bold of you to assume that california will still exist by 2035
@anydaynow01
@anydaynow01 3 роки тому
@@Sevenspent Yep and they insist on shutting down all their fossil and nuclear base power. I see a lot of power purchasing from Nevada and Arizona in their future.
@OneNidim
@OneNidim 3 роки тому
@@anydaynow01 why would they shut down nuclear power? It’s one of the most efficient and green sources of energy to date. I guess just another reason Cali sucks
@zaranski2009
@zaranski2009 9 місяців тому
9:08 Without forgetting that you are comparing a very powerful electric car with a compact car. Imagine if you compared the Taycan with an Cayenne Turbo GT or this Mitsubishi with a BMW i3 or BYD Seagull
@xrpeople2394
@xrpeople2394 Рік тому
Great video definitely helped me with the thoughts about EV versus ICE. Although the power grid side of the argument I am still unsure about.
@dt9913
@dt9913 Рік тому
You should be unsure. Have you watched Planet of the Humans?
@FranciscoGarcia-mc8gj
@FranciscoGarcia-mc8gj 2 роки тому
Great explanations. However, at 8:42 in the video, what you showed as emissions from an electric power plant was actually steam from the cooling towers of a nuclear power plant. This steam is no radioactive, but rather it is isolated from any radiation. A lot of people mistakenly show cooling tower steam as scary "smoke" when in fact it is quite the opposite, as nuclear power plants emit very low CO2. They are the type of power plant we should want more of until this nuclear fusion power is figured out.
@samuelmatheson9655
@samuelmatheson9655 2 роки тому
Because it looks more imposing then a regular power plant
@rolandjacques649
@rolandjacques649 2 роки тому
Yep Americans are very ignorant when it comes to True clean plentiful, affordable and safe energy. France has 75% Nuclear energy, we can learn a lot right there.
@AnthonyMoody
@AnthonyMoody 2 роки тому
Fucking thank you!!!!! I hate that everyone thinks those cooking towers are emitting smoke Edit: cooling towers
@mariocamilleri9723
@mariocamilleri9723 2 роки тому
Good point.... In fact, they actually emit water vapour ! That's a misconception which I always try to address during my Physics lessons !
@darrenlombardi2576
@darrenlombardi2576 2 роки тому
Thank you. I have known this since I was young. Nuclear power is way more efficient and cleaner and last longer.
@albertoalmonte6131
@albertoalmonte6131 Рік тому
Thanks 4 this,your knowledge is very appreciated 👍
@g3ek1337
@g3ek1337 Рік тому
Do you include battery lifecycle and change in this after dies?
@ConairHockey
@ConairHockey 4 роки тому
I’m curious where hybrid or diesel cars sit in all of this.
@andream.464
@andream.464 4 роки тому
Connor Hall Hybrid cars are the least efficient: a lot of CO2 is produced during the production of the battery and CO2 is emitted during the life time of the vehicle! Diesel is worse than gasoline because it creates microparticles of polluting agents, which are very detrimental to the public health.
@sacatolasmoreira5593
@sacatolasmoreira5593 4 роки тому
@@andream.464 they have particle filters though
@cluelessbeekeeping1322
@cluelessbeekeeping1322 4 роки тому
They exist, they're just bigger and ride on rails.
@hendrikdependrik1891
@hendrikdependrik1891 4 роки тому
@@andream.464 It really depends on the building year and maintenance. According to Flemmish state broadcaster VRT research 2020 diesels are actually better for the environment compared to their gasoline environment. Indeed it's still true atmospheric gasoline engines are the best, but turbocharged gasoline engines are worse than turbocharged diesels due to the fact they've less filters. Turbos are bad, because they heat up the air so much they literally starting to burn air, or at least the nitrogen part of it. Cars running on CNG are okay with NOx emissions, but worse than diesel with PM emissions. www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2020/01/08/bijna-geen-verschil-meer-tussen-de-verschillende-type-auto-s-di/ These are the stats of new cars. When cars become older, filters become worse. Some owners even remove filters and catalysts to get more performance. With that in mind long-term turbocharged gasoline is better than turbocharged diesel.
@Henriburger1
@Henriburger1 4 роки тому
I don't know about diesel but I saw in a government report recently that the lifetime impact is lowest for hybrids, even lower than EVs who came second, and gas cars coming in last. I looked for the report again but I can't find it by myself. If you search and find it please link it below so I can bookmark it, thanks lol.
@josaphatfebrianj.f_works2838
@josaphatfebrianj.f_works2838 4 роки тому
"i know you're busy" yeah. busy searching for videos to watch on youtube
@yungamurai
@yungamurai 4 роки тому
Haha fr man.
@abdulgill5013
@abdulgill5013 4 роки тому
Of coarse, lol
@barracuda6817
@barracuda6817 4 роки тому
@@abdulgill5013 you're being very coarse
@stanlee1490
@stanlee1490 5 місяців тому
best with the line chart graph to understand the emission part too.. and batteries life for each EV can last max of 5 yrs (avg 4 yrs) ? every time there is a replacement, will this be extra emission?
@LS3D_Printing
@LS3D_Printing Рік тому
I appreciate this a lot. I feel like every person I talked to about this has only watched half of the video and made their opinion up.
@KrazyJake88
@KrazyJake88 4 роки тому
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I NEEDED IM DOING A SCHOOL PROJECCT MO POWAAHH BABEYY edit: holy crap thanks for the likes !
@unproductiveworkshop
@unproductiveworkshop 4 роки тому
Hope the school project goes well!
@NewbyTon
@NewbyTon 4 роки тому
Weight reduction and weight of the battery will be part of your project And remember that the force needed to accelerate something is mass times acceleration So the more the mass the more energy is needed Plus batteries for cars are at their infancy i think so it's power might get stronger while it's weight can also reduce as time goes on
@2013project_z
@2013project_z 4 роки тому
i’m doing one based on which is better for certain situations. gas or ev
@bryanperez2947
@bryanperez2947 4 роки тому
Easy A after watching this
@unproductiveworkshop
@unproductiveworkshop 4 роки тому
@@NewbyTon Definitely a good point there! Also worth mentioning the emissions and energy required to extract and manufacture some of the materials, alongside longevity/life.
@kertsisontare5266
@kertsisontare5266 4 роки тому
This video explains CLEARLY and more satisfying to watch than any other videos that I've watched so far related to this matter! Kudos!
@djaxelcarter5777
@djaxelcarter5777 4 роки тому
I've shared the shit out of it to my PetrolHeads
@bobtaylor9273
@bobtaylor9273 Рік тому
Concise and informative. Thanks a million for educating me for this important topic!
@matsv201
@matsv201 7 місяців тому
To bad the conclusion is all wrong, and not even close to be true. For example a EU low emission car (pre 2024) is 92gram/km. The most efficient electric car on the market (tesla 3 and Huyndai Ionic, shared place) will use about 0.18kWh of power from the power-station (grid losses included). The most efficient coal power plant in existence is 740g/kWh.. so that brings the mots efficient car and the most efficient power plan to 133g/km. That is quite a bit more than 92gram/km
@whoknows141
@whoknows141 Рік тому
Love these educational videos! 💪🏾
@sensiblecougar2723
@sensiblecougar2723 3 роки тому
“The average car in the US goes through about 500 gallons of gas per year” *Laughs in 5.7 hemi*
@thomashuxtable2817
@thomashuxtable2817 3 роки тому
Lol same *laughs in 5.0 coyote*
@maxxtheender
@maxxtheender 3 роки тому
could be worse, could have a SRT10 RAM, or have those all caught fire already?
@jalexanderevans
@jalexanderevans 3 роки тому
Get that supercharged 6.2, bruh
@codydunn242
@codydunn242 3 роки тому
Laughs in 7.4 😂 😂 😂 aka 454.
@kreizmann2943
@kreizmann2943 3 роки тому
*Laugs in 8.0 W16 Veyron*
@PaganiGaming
@PaganiGaming 4 роки тому
Day 113 of asking James to do an Up to speed on his Dad
@winterspeed6796
@winterspeed6796 4 роки тому
Same.
@captinmurphy1999
@captinmurphy1999 4 роки тому
Day 113 of seeing this bs
@Laylowex
@Laylowex 4 роки тому
Same👏🏾
@ianholmquist8492
@ianholmquist8492 4 роки тому
2 days ago you said it was day 93...
@trevorflanagan4873
@trevorflanagan4873 4 роки тому
We can still try
@hippie-io7225
@hippie-io7225 Рік тому
Nice overview! Also, fueling an EV from coal still results in fewer overall emissions, if you value moving the source of pollution away from city centers. This could save approx 100,000 lives per year.
@GreggSR
@GreggSR 11 місяців тому
Old video, but a good one. I learned something new today, thanks man.
@juniormoreno3489
@juniormoreno3489 4 роки тому
* depressed Hemi noises*
@emaxxracer9931
@emaxxracer9931 4 роки тому
Junior Moreno underrated comment
@hathaway.1166
@hathaway.1166 4 роки тому
WHEEEEEeeeeee....
@matthew_natividad
@matthew_natividad 4 роки тому
*Sad turbo hisses*
@Underp4ntz_Gaming_Channel
@Underp4ntz_Gaming_Channel 4 роки тому
Depressive Hemi Noises and Sad Turbo Hisses aren't going anywhere they will be still around over 50-70 years. Fossil fuel will stay and hydrogen is the future, and probably alongside fossil/bio fuel... in Europe companies are already building a lot of hydrogen pump stations.
@justindesrosiers3145
@justindesrosiers3145 4 роки тому
**sad knocking 3 cylinder noise**
@hashtag3073
@hashtag3073 3 роки тому
"such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric" BOO free my boy nuclear power!
@Simon-nx1sc
@Simon-nx1sc 3 роки тому
Although nuclear can be clean and safe, to make it safe is incredibly expensive. I wouldn't call it the best new power station to build. Especially economically speaking. (src: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/jXOQdnmxZ6arrqs.html and extensive wikipedia research)
@DeiKuromu
@DeiKuromu 3 роки тому
Western Europe (except France): We are going to decommission all our nuclear plants! Long live renewables! Also Western Europe: They build new coal plants and pipelines to avoid an energy crisis... Me: *_Why the f***!?_*
@ronnies07
@ronnies07 3 роки тому
​@@Simon-nx1sc Also very hairy politically. US has a nuke waste problem stemming from carter's ban on fuel recycling in '77. When you reprocess nuke fuel you end up with plutonium, which has military applications. Having all these reactors for "Peaceful purposes" that conveniently made the magic sauce for mega bombs during the midst of the cold war was some seriously bad optics.
@goganito
@goganito 3 роки тому
it isn't clean
@MrArjanOskam
@MrArjanOskam 3 роки тому
@@DeiKuromu France has now the highest amount of clean energy. Germany planted a million windmills and solar panels. Which kill thousands of birds, destroy enormous pieces of land and make them inhabitable. So you would think Germany is green now? Well, France has like more than twice more green energy, only because of a few nuclear plants. So while France is clean, Germany is mass-murdering birds and other animals.
@charlienorway
@charlienorway Рік тому
How much electricity is used getting up the oil, processing it?
@4sm0d34n100
@4sm0d34n100 7 місяців тому
One other thing to consider is the ability to charge vehicles at home, many homes cannot actually generate enough power to charge vehicles and the cost of upgrading the central power at a private residence is high enough that there are going to be people that cannot afford to switch to an electric vehicle. I would also be curious to see comparisons on how far electric cars can travel vs how far an ICE engine can go. Also length of charge time vs how much time it takes to fill a gas tank is something to consider. I am seeing a lot of things coming out about EV semi's and delivery vehicles and many drivers that I have talked to are worried that it will be impossible to finish a delivery route in an EV. I would be curious to see if you all can find more definitive information on some of these points because all of my sources are biased and not 100% accurate.
@carultch
@carultch Місяць тому
You can implement a control system that monitors the net instantaneous power to your house, and controls big ticket and flexible loads to run at different times. Most of the time, your house isn't consuming anywhere near its full electric capacity; it's only when you have a perfect storm of load concurrence that you have this problem. The controllers can put EV charging on pause, any time you have high demand from other loads, and waits until your other demand settles to charge it. It can also do this with hot water heaters, air conditioning, and other big-ticket loads. Another thing that helps is a VFD driven air conditioner, so that you don't need to have it spike on and off intermittently.
@devongee1776
@devongee1776 4 роки тому
"this could've been an hour long video" -me, and everybody else on Coronacation: yeah. Thanks for cheaping out
@jakereese6698
@jakereese6698 4 роки тому
I am literally writing a term paper on this right now.
@aljon5947
@aljon5947 4 роки тому
Whats your opinion on it?
@AwesomeAlex808
@AwesomeAlex808 4 роки тому
Take a 5 hour break
@m_paz
@m_paz 4 роки тому
I did a paper on this a few years ago. Keep in mind battery production carbon emmissions are very over simplified and biased, I sugest you go through the different components of it and come up with an average yourself, there are many papers on this which are more specific and most of them not biased
@qlus
@qlus 4 роки тому
I also did a project on this last year
@jordanharkema1495
@jordanharkema1495 4 роки тому
I wrote on on the topic this semester too. Really interesting stuff
@devonwright1651
@devonwright1651 Рік тому
Love the content love the video's, keep up the great work! 👍
@reditoao
@reditoao 26 днів тому
Your math is wrong. The average EV breakeven point is more like 1.5 years for short range EV, and 5 years for long range EV. You also didn't take into account battery replacement especially for short range EVs, who will be far more affected by battery degradation. Battery warranties typically last for 8 to 10 years. 2nd hand EVs will need their batteries replaced sooner than later.
@chrisguevara
@chrisguevara 4 роки тому
Solid State batteries...that should revolutionize energy storage for years to come.
@nathanlucas2169
@nathanlucas2169 4 роки тому
I believe Samsung finally created one that actually works. It's not great but it's a start
@ingeralhaosului
@ingeralhaosului 4 роки тому
Liquid metal batteries will revolutionize large scale grid level storage for renewable energy like solar.
@AmplifyAmbition
@AmplifyAmbition 4 роки тому
Solid state is a pipe dream.
@vwertix1662
@vwertix1662 4 роки тому
@thevso i present to you, nuclear.
@tsgoten
@tsgoten 4 роки тому
VwertIX I like nuclear too, but recently I’ve learned that aside from the toxic leftover, which I can overlook since it produces SO much energy and we can store the toxic waste in Lead containers and such. The biggest issue is actually insurance and cost, no one insures Nuclear plants because the possible payout if something were to go wrong is just too much for them. So taxpayers have to insure the nuclear plants. Also the vast majority of plants are not profitable. I still think we should continue doing research and trying to make it safer so insurance is easier and development costs can also go down.
@adamsudek9436
@adamsudek9436 4 роки тому
Man, this is the best video at the best time. Im actually doing a school project about this exact topic. Thx for clearance😂
@jg5001
@jg5001 4 роки тому
I did my college report in 2018 about this. We had a minimum 7 minutes of talk time but this topic took me at best 18 minutes to discuss with my backed up sources. Donut needed to bring in source information on screen to make it a bit more credible.
@user-ec6kt2fg7m
@user-ec6kt2fg7m 4 роки тому
Me too. I did it in Uni. nobody knew about it when asked. I called it conflict minerals. I went from phone to cars, to referencing jewelry. I got extra credit, too. Great topic. XD When 7 mins. turn into half an hour and no one is yawning that's a great job right there.
@chris_081
@chris_081 4 роки тому
Think outside of CO2 footprints. What effect do batteries have on the environment in regards to mining? I'm not speaking on the fuel spent by mining vehicles. Think outside of that. Look at what strip mining does to an area. What cobalt mining does to a community. I want electric vehicles to be something viable. However, concern over the longevity of a battery and its replacement concern me as well. What does it take to reproduce a battery. Again outside the box thinking away from CO2 footprints.
@connermay5995
@connermay5995 4 роки тому
U got school rn?
@edward2030
@edward2030 4 роки тому
There are numerous things he got wrong
@rayban8680
@rayban8680 Рік тому
Thanks, great video, truly informative.
@anjalikiranpure4696
@anjalikiranpure4696 Рік тому
From where did you take this information
@Bularistan4o
@Bularistan4o 4 роки тому
James: *tattoos Dodge* Noaln: FRICKING CHARGERS!
@topd7566
@topd7566 4 роки тому
just say fucking
@tsinjorasamy3852
@tsinjorasamy3852 4 роки тому
Noaln
@anthnylder8136
@anthnylder8136 4 роки тому
Noaln
@stevenleach6506
@stevenleach6506 4 роки тому
@@topd7566 *demonetized*
@DerekGaston
@DerekGaston 3 роки тому
Great video! One quibble: please try not to show nuclear cooling towers when you talk about emissions. All that’s coming out of there is water vapor….
@Cody-cs9hj
@Cody-cs9hj 3 роки тому
Many coal power plants use the same type of cooling tower. We have one near where I live that uses them.
@DerekGaston
@DerekGaston 3 роки тому
@@Cody-cs9hj true - but it’s also true that the only thing coming out of coal cooling towers is steam as well. Basically: pictures of cooling towers that look like that are dramatic (mostly because of their association with nuclear) - but they are not where the pollution comes from…
@hannahbanana9901
@hannahbanana9901 2 роки тому
Water vapour is still a greenhouse gas
@alexanderwu
@alexanderwu 2 роки тому
@@hannahbanana9901 yes but it doesn't actually cause the Earth to warm because if there is too much water vapor it condenses into liquid
@ContentKreate
@ContentKreate 2 роки тому
@@alexanderwu And like co2 its good for the environment.
@uria702
@uria702 2 місяці тому
“As time goes on the environmental impact of production will go down…I hope”… I can say the same thing about gas engines.
@cheker008
@cheker008 Рік тому
What about battery longevity and the co2 involved in putting a new one in and getting rid of the old one ? You even mentioned the recycling process and didn't include it in the calculation ?
@bigyike
@bigyike 4 роки тому
Seriously loved this video, glad we can finally put this argument to rest.
@HyperVanilo
@HyperVanilo 4 роки тому
Not until another person make this kind of video
@alannafs4
@alannafs4 4 роки тому
I'm sure ev abuse won't end anytime soon
@brionwreede9989
@brionwreede9989 4 роки тому
there still a few points that are not covered by the video. like electric semi trucks and if its possible to convert over to them completely. not to mention the oils used in electric vehicles, and if we switched over 100 percent to electric vehicles would it work? for the most part this does get rid of most questions.
@Troy_K
@Troy_K 4 роки тому
Amen
@herejust4cars723
@herejust4cars723 4 роки тому
​@@brionwreede9989 Also nolan said Lithium extraction pollutes a lot of water, and then he only compared the atmosphere pollution
@charlesadams6154
@charlesadams6154 2 роки тому
If I have to drive an EV to work so I can drive my SS on the weekend I’m fine with that. I like the idea of EV’s but not the limitations.
@magnom3922
@magnom3922 2 роки тому
Yeah. I'd if they are around i just want to be able to still have gasolines newly produced.
@scottwilson6771
@scottwilson6771 2 роки тому
This is an underrated comment
@thomasmichaelctan
@thomasmichaelctan 2 роки тому
This would be nice if by 2030 companies didn't have to stop ICE production on vehicles. What an end for petrol heads. smh
@6-Iron
@6-Iron 2 роки тому
@@thomasmichaelctan Says who? When was this decided and agreed upon by consumers? Demand will decide what is produced. You can’t force an energy transition. It has to be feasible to do so.
@FroggieIII
@FroggieIII 2 роки тому
By SS do you mean Camaro? Or Commodore? Or something else? Either way, props man!
@michaelusswisconsin6002
@michaelusswisconsin6002 7 місяців тому
Also the rare earth elements that are mined have to be purified but this leaves radioactive material behind like Uranium.
@OldSkullSoldier
@OldSkullSoldier 9 місяців тому
You forgot to mention one very important thing: recycling and pollution. stockpiling of EV batteries means that these will either corrode and poison ground waters or start burning - every year there are many typical landfill fires, just because there is too much garbage and someone wants it to disappear. When this happens there will be no way to put that fire down - right now only fast way to extinguish EV burning is to submerge it in water. absolutely undoable on a landfill. Also about electric grid overload: Yes, 25% of energy being used to charge EVs is acceptable. But problem is that EVs are being charged mostly at the same time (evening). THere are university studies on this and as I recall maximum number of EVs that should not cause any trouble was in range 2-5% of all cars in US. In EU it might get even worse, as at the same time heat pumps are starting to be a must for new houses and in winter PV produces barely any energy - if you and your neighbors charge EV and heat home at the same time, your town might get into trouble.
@bluecollardisruptor9584
@bluecollardisruptor9584 4 роки тому
Video released one month before Tesla’s announcement of the zero cobalt/one million mile battery.
@rodh1404
@rodh1404 4 роки тому
That brings us to the issue of energy density. The Million Mile battery exists, but as I understand it, the lower energy density means the battery has to be bigger and heavier, making it a lot less likely that these batteries will be used in cars intended for private use or for long distance travel. You might see them in taxi cabs and city based courier vans though.
@Joelbrown97
@Joelbrown97 4 роки тому
Check out “the limiting factor”, he’s put out some great videos recently detailing what is likely to be presented at battery day. I think you’ll find that energy density will go up not down.
@oscarscottbaker2641
@oscarscottbaker2641 4 роки тому
@@rodh1404 the motors would be fucked before it hits 500k
@yeahbuddy92193911
@yeahbuddy92193911 4 роки тому
SO true Adam! Tesla is already making their batteries to last 500k miles, people just dont know, they just want to hate electric vehicles for some reason.
@gigi9467
@gigi9467 4 роки тому
yeahbuddy92193911 cuz they have no soul, sure they are fast but thats only part Of the equation, also i dont want to wait 4-8 hours for a charge thats why ppl hate on the or should i say car guys.
@CabGaming__
@CabGaming__ 4 роки тому
8:08 RAMCHARGERS!!!
@lREZinPEACEl
@lREZinPEACEl 28 днів тому
Can you do a video on the charging infrastructure and when it makes sence to switch? In my area there is not much charging and a lot of apartments where you can’t charge. My friend had to return his. I also live in a van and would like to switch to the electric sprinter van but it’s just not doable atm with infrastructure. Also maybe talk about winter effects on electric cars. Iv seen a lot about how in northern nh where I live they can’t handle the winter months
@LarryMcLarren
@LarryMcLarren Рік тому
People who have a progressbar on their sponsorships should have a guaranteed place in heaven
@Mr.Ramirez95
@Mr.Ramirez95 4 роки тому
*Nolan:* I know your busy, you ain't got time for that *Me:* laughs in quarantine
@yammmit
@yammmit 4 роки тому
Mr. Ramirez He said “you’re”
@mantis_toboggan_md
@mantis_toboggan_md 4 роки тому
@@yammmit Yer
@yammmit
@yammmit 4 роки тому
Adrian G. no, that’s not a word.
@Mr.Ramirez95
@Mr.Ramirez95 4 роки тому
@@yammmithow about yonder?
@abdulgill5013
@abdulgill5013 4 роки тому
@@Mr.Ramirez95 why you making up words
@kennethSaavedraIG9812
@kennethSaavedraIG9812 4 роки тому
Nolan: I know you’re busy Me under quarantine: 😐 what the f??
@Architect172
@Architect172 7 місяців тому
Even if not better for the envirment , they can't do not have monopoly on the price of the "fuel" that goes in it, and thats also inportant.
@jmizzonini
@jmizzonini 3 роки тому
The power grid can handle it! *Lives in California confused
@adamsmith-bg5wq
@adamsmith-bg5wq 3 роки тому
According to Engineering Explained, if EVERYONE swapped their cars for EVs it would be an extra 30% draw from the power grid. Most grids could handle that at non-peak load times.
@patrickprafke4894
@patrickprafke4894 3 роки тому
Lol, 30%? That's optimistic.
@andrewminott7225
@andrewminott7225 3 роки тому
And here is my $0.50 take on this... to increase the electricity needed for consumption, you need: 1. More hydro electric power to create electricity... dams use up more land space and flood out ecological and productive lands ☹️ that's a no-go 2. You need hectares to produce electricity via solar panels, again reducing prime productive land to create electricity for EV consumption 3. You need hectares to produce electricity via wind farms/turbines... again reducing prime productive land to create electricity for EV consumption 4. Increasing nuclear production to generate electricity needs strict monitoring (remember Love Island / Chernobyl) Every electricity solution has major impact on the environment so EVs may not be the ideal way to go
@patrickprafke4894
@patrickprafke4894 3 роки тому
forgetting 1. The "high" demand for these they tout is from mandates and regulations. Can't say its demand when its closing in on the only choice. 2. The electric cost that's about to skyrocket to repair from all the equipment not being able to handle the sustained load. 3. The cost of having "licensed elechickens" installing all this stuff in your home to charge this stuff. 4. The odd simutanius occurence of state and local governments eliminating your ability to generate your own electricity. 5. The rabbit hole of control your various levels of government is going to have to wield in order to make this work while profiting from this both personally and professionally.
@patrickprafke4894
@patrickprafke4894 3 роки тому
@@andrewminott7225 sadly Chernobyl didn't have enough rods to stop a reaction to begin with. It was a disaster waiting to happen.
Why Hydrogen Cars Flopped
16:31
Donut
Переглядів 4,8 млн
Are Electric Cars Worse For The Environment? Myth Busted
13:47
Engineering Explained
Переглядів 2,1 млн
Эта Мама Испортила Гендер-Пати 😂
00:40
Глеб Рандалайнен
Переглядів 8 млн
Зомби Апокалипсис  часть 1 🤯#shorts
00:29
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 7 млн
Why Car Colors Are Boring Now
11:45
Donut
Переглядів 4 млн
Americans Refuse to Buy EV’s… Why?
15:54
Cash Jordan
Переглядів 821 тис.
Why Electric Cars Won't Save Us
14:06
Our Changing Climate
Переглядів 162 тис.
EVs Owners HAD ENOUGH & Want to SWITCH BACK to Gas Cars!
8:48
Chase Car
Переглядів 263 тис.
Who ACTUALLY Made Your Car? | WheelHouse
9:51
Donut
Переглядів 3,6 млн
The reality of living with an EV that nobody talks about !!
17:17
Why Race Cars Don’t Have Airbags
17:31
Donut
Переглядів 2,8 млн
Electric Cars Won't Change Anything, Here's Why
11:05
Adam Something
Переглядів 1 млн
Разбил лобовое стекло! 😱
0:20
Взрывная История
Переглядів 2,5 млн
Лучшие АВТО за 100 тыс. ТОП 3
0:45
Авторазбор Гидрач
Переглядів 1 млн
John Deere 6430 #tractor #ploughing #lemken 😎 @FlyingPixelsPhotography
0:15
Van Dronewerk Agro
Переглядів 2,1 млн