Thankyou for being so accommodating 🇬🇧

We've heard you've got some good Rally courses, just coming to have a go on them if thats alright?

Welcome Finland to the family.

@@OhWendy Did you finish? 😅

Your poor boy . You dont understand that like Scotland you are now a sitting target ? I wonder how many nukes are pointing at us both right now

Apologies but have read some negative comments about this deployment. While we are a small island nation we are really well connected across the globe. Our military training in another European, Sovereign Nation is a sign of commitment and solidarity. Do I agree, personally with all the politics, not necessarily. Am I willing to watch another country bullied/invaded….definitely not. Apologies but rant over.

​@robstafford8306 The problem is your fellow countrymen and media, not you. Your countrymen go out of their way to degrade, belittle, and diminish their allies and their achievements, quality, etc. This, in turn, breeds hate in response. Any negative comments you're seeing here is a direct result of that pig-headed attitude.

They learn even more from the Russians, but none of them are alive to tell the story

"Support & cohesion" 🤣❗️

@@robstafford8306 you might want to educate yourself!

Lol. Nah.

Amen

The world has changed since February 22.

​@@stevee7467what happened then?

@@RogerMellie-yk3gw Think he ment February 24 2022 The second start of the Ukraine war..

@@mynameisschezuan oh right. I don't think that was too big of a deal. But I get what they mean

@@RogerMellie-yk3gw Ukraine started the war in 2014, Russia will end it very soon

nato is a agressiv army ,wake up, kid

We know are thankfully.

Yes the UK forces needs more but it has to be paid for and NO one wants to pay more taxes and the UK lost nearly a billion in taxes a year thanks to that dirty pedo in Dunblane sadly.

What? They do that for fun not to fight in the governments wars

@@mikey22355 pls accept my profuse apologies.

This started back in about late February , going in stages until at least May

Or Blue Thunder.

Ask it in person please

Ignorance is failure

@@costacoffee9961 you've failed then 🤣😂🤣😂👍

@@costacoffee9961 I'll come round your house if you want 🤣😂🤣😂

@@md2320 I've put a kettle on

Yep -- Google Translate.

We're not at war, does it need to be spelled out for you?

@@luciussander8217 OK then. Syria , Iraq, Isis, Somalia

@@jfkj1695yes, those are countries. Still doesn’t make Britain at war with anyone currently.

@@jfkj1695 shows you have no clue, Syria, Iraq, "isis". Why do you think we went into those nations......

Most people understand this

Shine against who? Unsophisticated Middle Easterners for the last 20-30 years?

@@smithers4420 Well if you listen to some commentators over the last couple of months, it seems they believe we would lose because we have less artillery. Wich is nonsense. The truth is, we (NATO) can make every opponents land look like a parking lot.

Sorry ... but your point was what exactly Casey?

And don't waste too much time and money

From a training op? Lol

I’m 54 ex army veteran.slipped disc,torn rotator cuff,torn knee ligaments Oh and hayfever 🤣🤣 Seriously I would be at the front of whatever queue there would be,just don’t tell my wife

I don't think that training the Jihadis who come amongst the economic migrants is a wise move.

@@thegoat11111 I agree that is why they would be given only jobs that are not in the least bit a matter of security. They would be given jobs such as cook or cleaner of the kitchen . Ditch diggers and so on .

@@bobbates7343 Cook? So they can poison everyone.

Thank god you're not in a position of power.

The UK still has plenty of territory overseas......

@@grovsey3656 not near Ukraine though

@@tim-williams so your pro russia? 🤣🤣

​@@tim-williamsthey have allies near ukraine.

@@thescottishanimeguy9946 still not defence though is it. If you ally with some kid in the playground and fight all their neighbours for them, that is called attacking not defending. It's a basic English language lesson.

womp womp

The ban on beads was lifted sometime ago !

@@RJM1011 : ah -> leaky gasmasks ..

@@bobnewhart4183 Not my problem !

No lol

Z

❤❤❤Gods will Be Done for it has to happen no Fear

Well, I live right next to a airbase, and they now train in there helicopters through night and day, rather than 1 or the other, and they have doubled the aircraft in the sky at once. Somethings happening. For past 3 years its always been the same number in the air, past few days it doubled.

@@Glory3823Gods ? Pagans

At least 90, 000 troops involved in total in Steadfast Defender , that being the overall exercise , and that 90,,000 approximately represents that immediately available of Nato's 300 000 strong Response Force , this all was spearheaded a month of so back by deployment of UK 7th Armored Bde the Desert Rats, among others , the Poles involved ,and at sea UK Carrier Strike Group centered on HMS Prince of Wales with Nato escorts ,under Nato command , that deployed supercarrier by itself more than russia has operable , Kutznesov not back til later this year or next yr or maybe never. And at same time then ,last month Norway Finland and Sweden , the latter 2 having joined Nato now , had almost 20 000 troops in an Arctic exercise in Lappland ,that being a couple or few hundred miles from Murmansk . and now at this point in Steadfast Defender , Poland and Lithuania with about 20, 000 troops exercising, training to defend the Suwalki Gap in NE Poland ,&the Brits in with this at same time

@@mnufeld8448 What will 300,000 soldiers do against a power like Russia? Russia couldn't beat Ukraine with 300,000 troops initially so what good would 300,000 NATO soldiers do if push comes to shove? It will all end in nuclear war probably.

@@KungFuWizardOfJesus combined with other allied forces in the area 300000 troops would outnumber Russian forces in the area.

@@AutismIsUnstoppable Russia could just call up more soldiers?

@@KungFuWizardOfJesus yes and so can nato. If push comes to shove NATO forces should have local superiority for a while and be able to bring more troops if needed.

Absolute hell if they were and we all know that’s why you said it....

Putin is not the problem, You need to look at Ukraine and the gangsters running it.

AH-64E is anything but ancient.

@@LRRPFco52 just a modification of 1976 concept...

​@user-yp2sc1cy1n and? It's still upgraded, a lot of Russias newer kit like the t-90 and BMP 3 are based heavily off precious designs. That doesn't make those systems bad either.

And a KFC

Also more joining NATO ! Which is a GOOD thing as Canada is such a let down and the worst member of NATO.

Our pilots don't wear flip flops in the cockpit.

Yeah lmao being over there in finland especially

Losing? Putin is losing 900 people per day apparently. Not a recipe for political success.

NO one is wining over there !

@@RJM1011clearly Russia 🇷🇺 is winning 🎉

​@@bugazi3037pretty sure they won a couple years back. Who controls Donbas? It sure ain't Nato-allied Ukraine

Not their role. Obviously, you have no clue.

It's an attack helicopter, not a typhoon.

"The AH-64E also allows its crew to take control of UAVs in its vicinity, and to view ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) information and full motion video feeds directly in its cockpits from both those UAVs and troops on the ground." RUSI "A Rebirth for the British Army’s Apache Fleet" 2016

@@cluckingbells One drone would take it out and it would be a waste of money and crew . Pretty much like a tank your a sitting duck

Well it's a good thing your not making decisions.

@@AutismIsUnstoppable what sending men to an inevitable death ? I think the world needs me more than it needs one flew over the cuckoo nest

Take note of a country far smaller and weaker than themselves? Lol. Don't think they need to

Wtf would an apache do to stop a small boat full of non combatants? Serious question.

you are yes

​@James28R comedy golf. Very One Show

And a Kremlin bot

​@@Atlantis.Rebornnah. That's you

Your quoting a mistranslation. It's more correctly translated as "thou shalt not murder"

Z