Keep goin my friend!

🤣🤣🤣😂😂

Hahahhaahha

Who's GQ

@@robertpietraru1939 this channel

she isn't so guilty of her privileged position, but can criticize others for theirs lolol. Of course there is some factors that may affect "privilege," but dedication and passion goes a lot further than your skin color or gender... something msm seems to sweep under the rug.

😂🤣😭

She's a product of the same self-loathing/worshiping culture that manufactured Patty Hearst.

@@ripperfisher182250 Dedication, passion, and competence. Criminals are generally incompetent and thus unable to compete honestly, hence THEIR manifestation of the so-called "patriarchy" - which only exists today in the context of socially engineered unlawful disorder... which benefits the incompetent, and those who feed on them. Donald Trump and the plethora of tribal organized criminal goons circling in his orbit demonstrate how that works.

She is the brainworks of the farm. Are you not aware, sisters, that it is for your benefit that she eats all the apples and drinks all the milk!?!

Peterson pulls a Cathy Newman though: 19:00 'I don't regard the West as a tyrannical patriarchy, that's for sure its purely not, when you describe it as tyrannical patriarchy you are saying it is purely that, merely to define it as a patriarchy implies unidimensionality, to insist that is also tyrannical is not a balanced view point, what if the patriarchy is composed primarily of women, [Helen corrects JP vocabulary problem, that would be a matriarchy.], we take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with most women, is it then a matriarchal structure? If it's dominated by women is it a tyrannical patriarchy? [Jordan, she already corrected you on that, dominated by women is a matriarchy. JP pulls a Cathy Newman, so you are saying If it's dominated by women is it a tyrannical patriarchy? You don't regard the West as patriarchy, but you regard the medical field as a patriarchy? What about in the Rubin/Anderson interview when you said the West is an oppresive patriarchy but not purely that? So which is it? If you say its an oppressive patriarchy you are saying it is unidimensional, purely that, or that it is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that?]

peterson is a crooked liar and clown, claims the hierarchies of capitalism are based on competence. he is "demonstrably" WRONG. the hierarchies of capitalism are /\ pyramid shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy. capitalism is UNNATURAL and abusive because of that fact.

@psychcowboy1 Maybe consider going back to only assuring us how much smarter you are than Peterson rather than trying and failing to show it like you did in your comment.

@@specialkalberta peterson makes the really unintelligent or dishonest assumption that hierarchy automatically means a /\ pyramid shape. that is not strawmanning him, please understand what he is implying in dozens of videos (if you look) the hierarchies of CAPITALISM are /\ pyramid shaped, while every NATURAL hierarchy of competence is a bell curve (IQ bell curve) with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base of low paid workers in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy because there aren't enough people at the bottom to skim profit from their labor. peterson claims that flattening the hierarchy impedes excellence ! that is also UTTER nonsense, it implies that we have done away with the best people ! WE HAVEN'T, that's just another baseless non sequitur peterson makes.

@@specialkalberta This will be tough for you but try debating with facts rather than feelings and insults. Just watch how I do it.

Well that's damning

Yes, it seems you are correct. I had thought the continuity seemed disrupted but didn't give it enough thought til I read your post. thank you for pointing this out. Wonder what exactly they were afraid to let viewers hear and wanted to cut out.

He made her cry after that idiotic opinion about what hierarchy is.

@@navindudissanayake9883 Agreed. Peterson's opinion on hierarchy is idiotic.

@@psychcowboy1 you cant even read, can you? You are such an imbecil that you think your opinion on hierarchy is more valid than the findings of a scientist...

she just got destroyed by 2 words

Eury lol

It baffles me you don't think exactly like me?!?....really, of all the things to baffle you.

*read more* BAM! haven't laughed that hard in weeks

@@Toodream I caught that too....what a smug broad.

Me too!

Same, I'm a female and I admire this man more than any other intellectual I've studied. His logical analysis and articulation are unparalleled today, not to mention his courage. May God bless him and his family.

I think liberals write him off without actually listening to him speak or read his work. He’s an extremely genuine, faceted person and he’s fascinating to me. I love how passionate he is about the topics he feels strongly about. The things he says about equality of opportunity vs outcome is very important especially with the social and political climate we live in. He was so correct about what he said regarding how people captured by ideology are so predicable and lack nuance in that they could have replaced her with another liberal woman and it wouldn’t have made much as a difference because their ideology overtakes their personalities. When she said women can’t live as full humans without access to abortion I couldn’t roll my eyes hard enough. She was so outclassed in this interview with him.

You claim to be a woman. So? Does that matter? Anyway - Peterson is a tool and needs additional professional help. Plenty of professional help. Although I seriously doubt it will help the tool. Why? Because he is a depressed & suicidal tool. He is paranoid beyond help. And- He ought to be!!!

“Dr. Peterson”. Often times the opposition tries to downplay the fact that this man is highly educated, and rather equate him with being ignorantly co-opted by the ‘far-right’.

peterson claims that the hierarchies of capitalism are based on ability, he is lying. every hierarchy of ability is a bell curve (IQ bell curve) with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. capitalism is an artificial PYRAMID hierarchy. /\ pyramid hierarchies are social constructs that are integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy. capitalism is unethical and abusive because of that fact.

White Left in a nutshell, ain't it.

@@aeternusdoleo4531 White left? Racist

@Gophuck Urself is it not enough? What else are you

@@ZehManelCigano You are wearing out words like "racist" and "sexist" to the point where they mean nothing AT ALL anymore. Keep on going! (Proud white MAN here...sue me! Had enough of you getting overpaid for jobs you can't even do over me. Feminism equals cancer!!)

@@AZDC99 im a white male. Please educate me. What is the difference between black left and white left

Understood

😂😂

Viva la revolution!

@@user-qt3nw8oo1q why would an american say that?

@@AikaDear :0 … :| u right.

There's a huge problem of men pretending to agree with women on the most ridiculous things they say. It doesn't help women to be delusional. Bill Burr has a good bit about it, when in ESPN the male pundits have to pretend dumbfounded when asked by female pundits why male NBA stars make more money the WNBA "stars".

Love that so many people are still watching and commenting on this masterpiece. Jordan showed he has a deep understanding of fundamental human needs and what it takes to thrive in our complex climate vs the interviewer who has been programmed how to think and deliver confusing messages that will keep people distracted and in despair.

@@Stokesx Yes, I absolutely love him. Like I said in my original comment, he actually supports women, he is a great voice for women. Usually, people would want a woman to be the voice for their own gender, but a lot of them nowadays are very, very brainwashed by the modern feminist agenda and it is sad. Feminism is great! but not modern feminism.

i think she did a good job in the interview . Don't forget the fact that he does have 21 years on her

@@SimonaPanait-uj5yw its not the age difference. Its her completely false assumptions and agenda driven narrative. She was outclassed.

@@SimonaPanait-uj5yw 21 years, 50 IQ points (at least) and if common sense were a quantifiable number, then at least 200% more than her.

Not really. She asked appropriate questions. Her problem is the indoctrination into faulty ideology based on emotion. She's a woman. Emotion is everything.

@@kenbulut-oe8sb He doesn't really answer her question on why women (and some girls when married from a young age) have historically taken the husband's surname...This is an important question and really does explain the transference of the notion of 'ownership' of males over females in many ways; although some could argue it's a transference of 'responsibility to provide and protect' rather than 'ownership' as such. However, this concept of provide and protect obviously hasn't been the scenario for countless teenage girls and women who have found themselves trapped - physically and economically - in violent and abusive marriages without any financial means out. He avoids this question by saying he doesn't really know, which seems a bit of a cop out as it should really be a topic/fact (as in the factual evidence of women historically taking their husband's surname) one would expect him to have reflected on more... Also her comment on property rights - obviously many men as well as all women didn't have access to property ownership and certain associated rights (including enfranchisement) for a long time (in post-agricultural revolution and industrialised societies, at least), yet certain socio-economic groups of men did achieve enfranchisement and certain ownership legal rights prior to women (including access to mortgage as well as property ownership) - surely this can't be ignored as a form of historical dominance and control of one sex over the other?

A toddler arm wrestling a giant

Perfect analogy.

Saving Private Ryan against the tank

Or blocking roads just coz your favorite candidate didn't get elected

You mean tampons

Congratulations Jason keep it up

Microphone equality!

they did that on purpose cuz their argument is so weak

You do hear his mic in the later part of the interview. They may have forgotten to turn it up earlier, which could mean they never tested their equipment before beginning their work.

I wish you could have seen my reaction to reading this. I almost spot soda all over my desk.

Dude she is writing book about feminism.

The problem is that she is expanding the term alt right to encompass people who it does not apply to, and then saying "look at these alt right people who like your work."

Epic reply.

Yes, I liked that bit!

JORDAN PETERSON DESTROYS FEMINIST WITH FACTS AND LOGIC :D

Lose definition of alt right...haha

Doubtful that "she'll learn". I have attempted to have calm rational discussions with lefties, and it usually results in them resorting to name calling, frantically waving their arms, and making stuff up. They never seem to learn - even the older ones.

I DOUBT IT

Neither one of them went into this interview in good faith. Neither was willing to actually listen to the other. This just furthered the divide.

@@axelbruv Professor and student scenario Expert upon the effects of ideologies and a young neo marxist ideologue... Notice when things were going bad for her she resorted to bad faith tactics by trying to say he was overly feminine....

She has been TOLD what messages to deliver. Be offended by everything. Create self limiting beliefs by a victimhood complex. Jordan simply says take responsibility for your life and somehow that is a threat to humanity.

JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.

​@@psychcowboy1 you see both. I see your issue, you cannot integrate both. You think the inherent contradiction within seeing reality as both object interaction and functional pattern recognition equates to having to sacrifice one for the other.

@@domestinger8805 Actually that psychobabble gibberish is Peterson himself. Apparently Peterson is incapable of integrating a couple things.

@@psychcowboy1 did you have a point?

@@domestinger8805 You determined that Peterson is incapable of integrating some things. My point is that he is the king of pointless psychobabble nonsense with no profound ideas about anything.

Why did I click that !!!

🤣

Yes, quite brilliant!!

* Right hook

She said she's read the alt right "enjoying" his work so he says read more. What? So he does admit the alt right do use his work and is saying ignore that and look at the others who enjoy his work who aren't alt right. What kind of comeback is that? He just admits it and says but don't just look at the bad guys though. The issue she's trying to bring up is whether he's at all responsible for encouraging the alt right so saying 'but there are others too' is besides the point. I feel like I misunderstood or just disagree that that is a 'whopping right hook'.

piyush sharma more like extreme BRUH, am I right?

@Justin Last true

DUDE!!BRUH!! THIS WAS FIRE!!

I like how they did that was to immediately paint him in a bad light

jordan peterson is pretty much the kwai chang caine of the academic world

peterson builds his belief in capitalism on a false premise, that being the hierarchies of capitalism are based on competence, he is wrong. the hierarchies of capitalism are pyramid /\ shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve, with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy.

@@bomination.citation please.

@@andrewross4685 what part do you want a citation on ?

@@andrewross4685 We are searching for a Peterson win.

@@psychcowboy1 watch the interview. The entire hour and a half is a Peterson win.

best comment on here, not sure why it doesnt have more likes.

Made my week!!!!

@@sawyermade5469 only 3 days old as of now. Haha. Doing pretty good.

Almost burst out laughing lol

I properly laughed reading this comment. Thank you 😂.

Total excellence imo too.

Natives Americans arent filthy rich

@@joshuajim65 define rich

JP takin this tryhard to school. She gets cred for trying though

Funnily enough he went through an epiphany and re-evaluated himself and wether most of what he said was ego and then realised that he sometimes had in the past said something that he didn't believe so a lie and it changed him there's videos on here on it, it takes an honest person to admit that they may have been wrong in the past,, I know someone will ask define honest 😉

No one can find a Peterson win.

No one can find a JP win.

@@psychcowboy1 Copying and pasting again, white knight?

@@Vixtuoso I agree, you can't find a JP win.

peterson builds his belief in capitalism on a false premise, that being the hierarchies of capitalism are based on competence, he is wrong. the hierarchies of capitalism are pyramid /\ shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve, with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy.

@@bomination. So, not just a few, but _very_ few at the top? Distinguishing between continents is essential, as there's certainly no lack of people at the bottom of the hierarchy. No model is entirely right or wrong in absolute terms anyway, even if they surely offer interesting perspectives from an analytical and socio-historical standpoint. Nevertheless, I don't see that transitioning from one model to another would have significantly changed the current situation regarding the alleged patriarchy. It wouldn't alter the current reality, our experiences, news, statistics, or the discourse and silence in our society - a society we have a more solid basis to speak clearly about. In short, I see nothing here that undermines Jordan Peterson's arguments or credibility.

strange lee 😆😆😆

😄😆

That’s not deep, but it is funny.

You need to stand up for yourself mate and not allow boyfriend to kick you out- man up - don’t be a wimp and weak

😹😹😹😹😹😹 ohhh boy.... it's so deep .... n dark . Sarcasm

Nnjni n nnnnnnnnnnn nijnnjijninjjnj nnnnnnjnnjinjjnn

She did well not running away crying.

Be more honest jp

I loved that😭

Yeah it’s pretty hilarious how triggered JP gets when it’s pointed out that the alt-right loves him.

peterson claims that the hierarchies of capitalism are based on ability, he is lying. every hierarchy of ability is a bell curve (IQ bell curve) with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. capitalism is an artificial PYRAMID hierarchy. /\ pyramid hierarchies are social constructs that are integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy. capitalism is unethical and abusive because of that fact.

protection from what exactly ?

@@ryan_phdsec so you consider women to be inferior ?

@@bomination.”protection form what exactly?” Well, it is traditionally the males role to provide financial protection and literal physical protection… no?

@@kaysnhawkes financial protection is a presupposition of a financial system/capitalism, that does NOT need to exist. and still the question remains, physical protection from what, other men ? and please don't say protection from wild animals like the other buffoon suggested, because half of all men are physical cowards no better at fighting off animal attacks than any woman !

​@@bomination. Inferior no weaker yes by the laws of averages

i dont want to. someone else should.

I was wondering if someone else besides me caught that. Well done!

@Drew Down Sure it is. Why not? She can easily resign and let someone "less privileged" have her position.

@@charlesomalley9564 The good ol' lets be charitable with the money of the others logic in full display here.

@@enesduraku6087 Exactly, and in this case it's even worse than that! She sees herself as immune (enlightened ally) while professing that others renounce their "privilege" because they are using it in a manner she does not like. If she ever gets what she's asking for, she will lose everything with the rest of us. I can't imagine that she has any children, otherwise how could she promote their genocide? This is subversion of a society in real time.

They probably un-mic'd Jordan on purpose.

Seriously. First thing I noticed haha

Did you just assume the audio person is a guy?! Sexist!!!!!

I also noticed that. The interviewer's audio is fine but somehow Prof. JP's audio is messed up. They probably did that on purpose lol

They definitely did it on purpose to make her appear dominant at a subconscious level

Literally

Yesssirrr

What’s your point?

@@jaymethomas7109 I just thought that it was interesting. Most videos this old don't attract very many comments.

I have no interest in these topics from what i view on youtube but the algerithm brought me to this video through an extension I use to auto play youtube while i lay in bed. If you've experienced 'click here to continue' on a video in the last few years you know what i'm on about but the point is that this is what UKposts wants you to see.

Yup, the propaganda war that various government agencies and globally sponsored think tanks are fighting in the public domain is incredibly real. Unfortunately it’s also unlike what they would wish everyone to believe incredibly easy to spot. My favourite thing is identifying the NPC bot shills in the comment section here they stand out like a sore thumb and it’s like they’re not even trying anymore !

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

And got properly rekt because of it... I think she need to git gud!!?!

😆😆😆

😂

I feel we talked more about her book in this interview than his... You know the one being interviewed

No one can find a Peterson win.

Np sir

Check out her write up on the interview Totally delusional www.google.com/amp/s/www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/helen-lewis-jordan-peterson%3famp

@Anthony Bergs she reckons she stumped him!!! When?!

@@asubmariner7970 she actually thought she raised some good points and stumped him,🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣, I want to watch the interview again if I missed anything

@Anthony Bergs I hope so, But I will check with you after I watched it again. But the most dumb thing she said was she thought that it was weird and out of reach to compare life advice and communism.

It was the best line I ever heard used against a liberal...

When did he say this?

Yeah it was deadly, mic smash

1:08:29

Her conversational style got a bit better after that.

This "lady" is pure evil

@@eagle5818 worse, she is ignorant and obdurately so…

No one can find a Peterson win.

Her poor husband is probably a doormat.

She’s glad

supporting the cause!

@@TranslatedAssumption they got divorced 🤣🤣

​@@TranslatedAssumption Oh, no doubt. Just look him up and look at those puppy eyes :)

"My big problem with the lobster is that it's scientifically... b ollocks" XD

@@quewntenerif616 Except it isn't, if you're capable of reading and understanding. As was readily proven by his comprehensive defense of the point and her shabby argument from authority (PZ Myers, FFS)

My favourite, “I benefit from lots of unearned privileges” Peterson: “Like your job!?” ROASTED and she was totally unaware, haha.

@@CampFireJammer She wasn't the one being silenced for nearly a minute a couple of times lol, and she had the decency of not saying the patronizing expression 'gotcha', like he did to Cathy. Then again she is intellectually honest, we cannot say the same about him.

@@thaliagarcia9684, #YaasSisSlayy #JordanManBad

Imagine being married to that… 🤦‍♂️

SHOCKER!

Hows he doing? Has been sick; last i heard. Like im not on the internet to find out..

Halcyon ur smart for not being on the internet. Hope he’s well

Then you don't know Zizek

𝟾:𝟺𝟻, ᴛʜᴀᴛ’s ᴛʜᴇ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ᴀ ʙᴏᴏᴋ ᴡᴀs ᴇɴᴅᴏʀsᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴀ sᴇᴀʟ.

Patient? Are you joking? He interrupted her every other sentence.

@@psychcowboy1 hahhahaha what a loser, get a life! hahahahh she is a joke like you hahah

​@@psychcowboy1I just watched 10 minutes and he didn't do that once

@@7beers -Were there any Peterson wins? Here are a couple of Helen wins, starting at like 41:00. 1. Helen: It works in two different ways, it makes lobsters more aggressive and it makes humans less aggressive.' Peterson interrupting: No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive...I know my neurochemistry, if you want to go play neurochemistry, It makes a lobster more likely to fight again.' [uh Whoops Jordan. She agreed with you that serotonin makes humans less aggressive, and she is wrong... for agreeing with you? Lobsters that want to fight are not displaying aggression? Fighting isn't aggression? The relevant paper is called Serotonin and Aggression Motivation in Crustaceans, concluding that serotonin makes lobsters adopt aggressive postures...SCORE: Helen 1, Jordan 0] 2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.' Helen: 'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...' Peterson interrupting: 'How do lobsters say that?' [Uh what Jordan? You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that. Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition? Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.] SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0 3. Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0] 17:20 Tyranny isn't good, that is the definition of tyranny, something that isn't good. [Uh no Jordan, that isn't the definition of tyranny.] I am benefiting from unearned privilege. Quit. You could trade it off with someone who is less privileged. I could, but I won't. [Not hypocrisy, no more than someone who supports programs for the homeless who won't just let homeless move in to their house] Filthy rich should pay their fair share in a progressive tax structure. You are in the top 1/10th of a percent of everyone who lived on the planet. [Yes Jordan, she makes more than a cave man, is that your point?] 19:00 in GQ interview: 'I don't regard the West as a tyrannical patriarchy, that's for sure its purely not, when you describe it as tyrannical patriarchy you are saying it is purely that, merely to define it as a patriarchy implies unidimensionality, [Whoops Jordan, remember in the dave rubin john anderson interview when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that? Contradiction alert' Watch him practically yell at her, THATS FOR SURE ITS PURELY NOT] We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with most women, is it then a matriarchal structure? If it's dominated by women is it a tyrannical patriarchy? [Jordan, she already corrected you on that, dominated by women is a matriarchy. JP pulls a Cathy Newman, so you are saying If it's dominated by women is it a tyrannical patriarchy? After spending this whole interview stating there is no patriarchy, now you admit the medical field is a patriarchy?]

@@7beers Listen again.. Peterson interrupting... Why would you blame men for that? Seriously Jordan, why would you blame men for barring women from professions?

Time stamp?

@@amitsaxena4108 17:30

Yup. Just your typical feminist mental gymnastics. It's easy to accuse others. It takes real character to look at yourself with some humility.

…. So women pressure other women into using makeup? According to her . And Great competent fathers are feminine?? I appreciate her ambition, but she has a LONG way to go with: ethics , respect, anger , wisdom, knowledge … Cant get into heaven by provoking people

I know right. Bloody golden

They do it on purpose so JBR won't sound clear

@Legendary StarNPC GQ, FHM et al haven't been male focused publications in years. if you look at the large swathe of their ads, they're very much focused towards women.

Have you ever seen the Mics that Mr Lobsterman uses? They're absolutely atrocious.

Lol exactly what I was thinking.

Or an interviewer who is a bit easier on the eyes

Good quote.

👏

Capitalism vs Communism basically

That is perfect

Solzhenitsyn definitely knew a little about freedom, and a whole lot more about a lack of.

I wouldn't worry too much about him. No doubt they both live in that self-deluded world called the far-left...

imagine being stuck in a marriage like that.

You can agree to disagree in relationships. it might be possible he changes her mind. It's good to have dreams.

The west / first world countries are full of weird and strange people

@@TSAR373 More than likely a beta soyboy.

We are searching for a JP win. No one can find one. At about 43:00 2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.' Helen: 'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...' Peterson interrupting: 'How do lobsters say that?' [Uh what Jordan? You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that. Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition? Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.] SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0 3. Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0] 17:20 Tyranny isn't good, that is the definition of tyranny, something that isn't good. [Uh no Jordan, that isn't the definition of tyranny.]

BS

Chad

New titled “Jordan Peterson defending his rational beliefs for an hour and a half”

@@DeathSpellXVI Nah JP is accurate on most things he says

@@DeathSpellXVI That's your argument? You need to try way harder.

His ability to pinpoint globalist rhetorical obsequious ideological propaganda and counterpoint it with laserlike accuracy is phenomenal to watch, but it’s sad that it needs to be done. It’s sad that these organisations feel the need to fill the public sector with propaganda and socially engineered. Psychologically targeted garbage, it’s screwing up societies, destroying lives and above all, it’s an incredibly dangerous game that’s being played, especially by the intelligence sector who should know better by now!

GQ is dead, nobody is reading it or watching it any more due to the fact the media that they write is BS - truth and trustworthiness is the rare quality everyone wants to find - and once you find that anywhere: person/work/place - just better not ever let that go in this day in age

Amen to that!

Oh, that's so Ben Shapiro: 'I'm more popular than you'

This is by far their most popular video, how ironic

Straight up

Were there any Peterson wins? Here are a couple of Helen wins, starting at like 41:00. 1. Helen: It works in two different ways, it makes lobsters more aggressive and it makes humans less aggressive.' Peterson interrupting: No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive...I know my neurochemistry, if you want to go play neurochemistry, It makes a lobster more likely to fight again.' [uh Whoops Jordan. She agreed with you that serotonin makes humans less aggressive, and she is wrong... for agreeing with you? Lobsters that want to fight are not displaying aggression? Fighting isn't aggression? The relevant paper is called Serotonin and Aggression Motivation in Crustaceans, concluding that serotonin makes lobsters adopt aggressive postures...SCORE: Helen 1, Jordan 0] 2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.' Helen: 'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...' Peterson interrupting: 'How do lobsters say that?' [Uh what Jordan? You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that. Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition? Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.] SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0 3. Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0] --Peterson at 19:00: 'That's for sure it's purely not, when you define it as tyrannical patriarchy implies one-dimensional...' [Whoops Jordan, remember in the dave rubin john anderson interview when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that? Contradiction alert'] What if the patriarchy is composed of women is it still a patriarchy? [Helen corrects JP by stating that it would be a matriarchy, score for Helen.] 'We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with women, is it that it is mostly men that makes it a patriarchy, if it is a structure that is composed of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of women and it is a tyrannical patriarchy... [Jordan pulls a Cathy Newman -- So You are Saying. Sorry Jordan, Helen, She just corrected you that composed or dominated primarily of women is a matriarchy. So after denying that we have a patriarchy numerous times in this interview you are now admitting that the medical field is a patriarchy?)

@@psychcowboy1 that's a whole lotta response for a very shallow comment lol

@@davethescrub858 I understand, you feel Peterson had a calm and concise solution to everything Helen said, but you don't know where that happened. I was pointing to some Helen wins.

@@psychcowboy1 always good to be able to see from the outside both perspectives on things. We good? I'm good, appreciate the time and effort in response 😊

@@davethescrub858 If you note there are about 250,000 comments that JP destroyed Helen with calm facts and logic, but no one has any idea where that happened. As a social phenomenon of mass delusion, it is unparalleled in modern times.

They changed the SD card. It wasn't a spot where JP finally outsmarted Helen.

I was crying when I heard that 🤣🤣🤣 omg he's such a savage

She's writing a book! Didn't you listen?

i'd hardly call a man making some adolescents clean their room a phenomenon

Her face and body language when he was grilling her over the lobsters...it was funny but i kinda felt embarrassed for her.......

Made my day bro

yeah says clean your room, addicted to pills...

pro-conversation

robert fripp he’s not perfect you’re definitely addicted to something aren’t we all

@@tostitosfritos1748 yep.. but i don't make millions posturing to insecure males..

robert fripp it’s business...

It can be quite discouraging to see how identity politics are spreading. But I think people are waking up and realising how bad it is getting. I have hope for the future.

I'm where she described him as calling his description as apocalyptic terms. I need to check back in on this in another 5 years.

Alex Jones been saying sense 1999

it was spreading like fire when they had this conversation - it's been spreading for over 10 years.

Yes!!!!!!

@nvb455 You found a spot where JP outsmarted Helen? Where? 19:00 'I don't regard the West as a tyrannical patriarchy, that's for sure its purely not, when you describe it as tyrannical patriarchy you are saying it is purely that, merely to define it as a patriarchy implies unidimensionality, to insist that is also tyrannical is not a balanced view point, what if the patriarchy is composed primarily of women, [Helen corrects JP vocabulary problem, that would be a matriarchy.], We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with most women, is it then a matriarchal structure? If it's dominated by women is it a tyrannical patriarchy? [Jordan, she already corrected you on that, dominated by women is a matriarchy. JP pulls a Cathy Newman, so you are saying If it's dominated by women is it a tyrannical patriarchy?] UH Jordan rememeber when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that in the Dave Rubin John Anderson video? Contradiction alert.

Right? He is a master at conveying his thoughts

@@Pratherwind 🤣

@@Person0fColor do you disagree? lol

His ownership of the English language is astounding and the way he puts together a complete thought is incredible. When he goes on rogan, I have to slow the playback down just slightly to make sure I catch everything he says.

Watch some Carl Sagan lecture’s especially the Q&As at the end. That man was a literal wordsmith , storyteller all the while being an absolute expert in his fields.

No one can find a JP win.

"Lorrdd Fadda😂"

He's just high on drugs here probably

@@penultimania4295 Helen won most of the points.

@@psychcowboy1JP got you worked up for 3yrs straight 😂

peterson builds his belief in capitalism on a false premise, that being the hierarchies of capitalism are based on competence, he is wrong. the hierarchies of capitalism are pyramid /\ shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve, with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy.

@@bomination.you’re wrong. And capitalism is far better than any other system ever devised, it has fed and housed and clothed and healed and educated and liberated more people than any other system ever. You’re not smart enough to do better. You do not understand human nature or nature nature. Competence is absolutely the driving force.

​@@bomination.The average people end up on the bottom because they are not the top 10 percent that rise to the top the other ten percent on the other side become a drain on the system

@@celuler22 you are definitely in the bottom 10%

Even God was like: 12:19

someone actually did? I doubt it

She never took her husband’s last name

LOOOOOOOLOOOOOOOOLOOOOOOOOOLOOOOOL

his name is Cuckleberry Finn

He is the Royce Gracie of psychology

Infotainment 😂😂😂😂😂

hahahaha he seriously dominated that exhibition!

IMO, Jordan is not at his best here (or maybe it was edited to appear that way), sometimes interrupting, angry?, making some unqualified statements. Helen often showing more patience. But if the topics here are of some interest, maybe watch some other Peterson like: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/soF0iJt-gn6kt5c.html or ukposts.info/have/v-deo/oHuGmpx_j4WTmYk.html

This is SUCH a brilliant discussion. Thank goodness he is spreading the word and standing up for men and women. How great would it be for more of these conversations to take place.

We are searching for a JP win. No one can find one. At about 43:00 2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.' Helen: 'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...' Peterson interrupting: 'How do lobsters say that?' [Uh what Jordan? You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that. Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition? Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.] SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0 3. Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0] 17:20 Tyranny isn't good, that is the definition of tyranny, something that isn't good. [Uh no Jordan, that isn't the definition of tyranny.]

Canadian. So North American, anyhow

Lets get this comment back to the top guys!!

@@Mechanicalpills becuase somehow this wasn't a solid example of what she spoke about in her book. WTF are you saying. Lol

You might need her book. With luck the pages will be Charmin soft, you know, just in case there is another shortage.

This is so funny 🤣🤣.

Fools never listen. They only wait to speak.

Bravo

If I could, I would give you an award for this comment.

So odd. What did you see that I didn’t. I saw an intellectual debate . And I really enjoyed that. What did you see?

It’s hard to argue with someone who has already thought everything through to the end.

Gold!!!!

Literally died reading this comment 🤣🤣🤣

Hahahahaha, true that 😂

@Serpant Stepper i love you more

Dumb comment Just do it ! No need to tell the world what you aren’t going to do

@@elsievaenz9531 That's actually the only need to comment such an announcement.

Time stamp?

Nicholas Brainard like an hour and 15 minutes somewhere around there

1:15:35

Bye Bye ki

No one can find a Peterson win.

But they leave this interview up which is clearly damning to the presenting side’s view 😂

It's likely that it might just be youtube. They mix comments around a lot with so much engagement.

@@leiasart4610 You're right it's youtube. They do mix comments around and push comments down if it's a popular video

@@Gallowglass7 you do realize when you leave a comment then you leave and come back your own comment is the first one you see. No matter where youtube pushes it you will always see your own at the top unless the channel deletes then it's just gone!

What do you expect from leftist amoebas?

peterson is a liar. he is trying to fool people by conflating natural hierarchy with socially constructed ARTIFICIAL CAPITALIST HIERARCHY. the hierarchies of capitalism are /\ pyramid shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve with few at the top and bottom and the MAJORITY in the middle. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy. capitalism is UNNATURAL and abusive because of that fact.

Men are better without even trying get over it. It was it was how we were made. We didn't have drama queens causing all kinds of b******* life would be a lot better

@@user-zz5rk7xc4w Recovering quite nicely

Lol they want the best of both worlds which is impossible, one of the dumbest types of humans on earth

@@stinkwrinkle8219 yes I'm grateful unsatisfied no matter what happens. Just like B l M.

why?

did my job and posted as well

@@logitfau252 how could you crittique her objectly if you shut her down?

Ratio

Missing reading that comment when I last watched this video a year ago - it was a massive hit. Thanks.

No one can find a Peterson win.

I agree, I'm dumb too but common sense is common sense.

peterson claims the hierarchies of capitalism are based on competence. he is "demonstrably" WRONG. the hierarchies of capitalism are /\ pyramid shaped, while every natural hierarchy of competence is a bell curve, with few at the top and bottom and the majority in the MIDDLE. /\ pyramid hierarchies are artificial and integral to capitalism/profit, there has to be a very large base in a capitalist hierarchy in order for profit to be generated, profit is not possible in a natural bell curve hierarchy. capitalism is UNNATURAL and abusive because of that fact