Ikr😂

Didn't want to advertise a rival YT channel.....

@@hashtag_thisguyas mr beast says , that’s stupid, you can both learn from each other and grow”

This is going to be on @TMISport bro

Or Bublik cracking up, that was funny as hell

No the rules own them such is life

@@pepelipeau9628 are you saying the umpire is the rule? I disagree

True !!

Are you saying a player could say or do even the nastiest things and nothing an umpire could do if then the other player said 'it's OK' ??

@@yahyayahya9999 eg?

Never seen someone laughing so hysterically after losing a point though. That was hilarious.

He was laughing because it was friendly instant karma For him thinking he was about to get an easy point 😂

@@SahilPatel-ln8iwactually he won the point……

The scream is natural and uncontrollable

​@@relaxtreme it is not uncontrollable. It is natural in some shots, in most it is voluntary, but it supposedly has a positive impact on the game. It is also repetitive and predictable, so it does not create the same disturbance as speaking in the middle of a point (when your rival is going to hit the ball, of course, it could even be hindrance on your ball to hit if you said something disturbing, not "sorry"). Of course some players take it a little too far.

​@@relaxtreme it's not natural, they do it for several reasons, mostly for psychological reasons. They want to distract their opponents by imitating the scream of their partner, so that they will challenge their thoughts of rather playing tennis for 6 hours instead of banging their wife (or the referee)

@@relaxtreme How great would it be if "I'm sorry" was natural and uncontrollable?

​@@Maiqelumpire is wrong here however. Since he said sorry long before the ball was his to hit, he couldnt have distracted the other person this way.

source?

​@@Alexander-nk2fv common sense and lots of matches played over the years

Interesting theory, but irrelevant here since the umpire was right.

The umpire was technically right, just stupid that they weren’t allowed to replay when both players wanted to

@@benhesford175 Bublik could had just smashed the next ball in the stands or let Medvedev hit an ace and the score would be the exact same then before the incident but no we have to go after the ref who did just follow the rulebook. Rules are there for a reason, if we just allow player to replay points on there demand then why even have rules or refs to begin with, nothing here is stupid except no offense your reasoning.

So here is the neat part,it’s not hindrance,there was no need for you to write a whole essay

The rules are clear cut. You can't talk during the point. It's hindrance regardless of the outcome.

​@@yeeeaaahmayneee3808 what is your definition of an essay? I think I appreciated this comment because it gave me a better insight into the situation. your comment was however, unnecessary no?

Its called "talking during the point"!

@@DanTuber At least Med did the right think which is what matters regardless of the sport or situation. That shows respect and human dignity towards that person which counts. He didn’t like how he “broke” a rule or violated a violation because he said sorry. I’ve seen players say sorry and apologized during the point they didn’t get penalized. It was a mistake by the umpire which we all do. That tells you that the player and umpire are not perfect.

It was for saying sorry to his opponent while they were playing a point

@@Jonny.16did you not pay attention to the video? He said sorry while HE was hitting the ball, based on the Ump (arrogant one), he hindered himself

⁠@@paxton4939 yep but some people will say "rules and rules" as if the rule isnt completely nonsensical. its ok to disregard stupid rules in extenuating circumstances

​@@yimpyoi9808what are you talking about? It's a very sensible rule but the umpire doesn't know the rule and she made a wrong call.

Lmao the problem is that he can say whatever he wants as long as he is the one about to hit the ball. Ref needs to go back to umpire school.

"Women"

A woman is never wrong so nah

And the opponent had cero chance at answering that second smash. He was on the floor for goodness sake. Hahaha.

​@@yomamacrib3297Not necessarily, in this case he should never have been given a hindrance but if he said something like "Eat this shot!", it would be a very different situation.

Is it time for misogynistic comments yet? No? Alright, I'll keep it for myself.

​@@SetiKt???

@@austinchen283 just kidding bro, lets make misandry jokes to make up for it, shall we?

@@SetiKtyou good?

Tbf apologising there could have led him to believe the point was over and he’d hit out the ball. If this was the case and he doesn’t get up in time to save ball then her call is correct but when they are both saying she’s wrong she should have backed down.

Thanks for pointing this out

…..Dumbpire?

Tennis TV

@@Bowl-tt8ec Bro

.

@TMISports

Not only WTA grunts, male player grunt too.

They must forbid that, I don't know what they're waiting for...

@@marivipalomino6975mate wta grunts is literally moaning

What are WTA grunts? Answer: Sexy

Premier league refs take the cake imo

As per rules, you can’t talk while the ball is in play. So, umpire made the right call. Medvedev should have finish the point and then apologise to him.

Rules are stupid in some context so if you follow all rules blindly, it makes you stupid too . "Can you imagine how stupid this call is?"😭

@@Kienlamb So, you are saying its OK to talk while the ball is in play. Brilliant.

@@discoverme30 don’twrite nonsense if you don’t know the rules,rule says that hindrance is called if player is obstructed by the opponent while preparing or during actual shot,you can’t hinder yourself,umpire was wrong and so are you

@@yeeeaaahmayneee3808 Do you even know anything about tennis? Don’t write idotic comments. Talking, Shouting, while the ball is still in play is a hindrance to the other player and the umpire made the right call. I guess a lot of keyboard warriors like you think they know better than an official umpire.

You don't know the rules. The umpire was right, the rules are just too broad in this regard.

​@@DrMontgomeryMontgomerycan they not agree to replay the point for a hindrance?

@@DrMontgomeryMontgomery it would have only been an hinderance if the ball was at Bublik's court to play, if it was a hinderane at all on what Medvedev did, then GRUNTING in every tennis match ever, is considered hinderance.

@@Relixification actually I just looked it up and you would be right for doubles, but in singles any talking can be considered hindrance. Grunting, as well as other unintentional screams or sounds, are listed as exceptions

@@jonolsen8136 - As much as that is how we'd like to view a match, players can't actually decide who gets what points because of their take on the rules.

She literally made the correct call

​@@jboww2121nope

@@jboww2121 She didn't dumbo

Women

and there is also this word for you,it's called misogyny

@@gorus6996 there's also this word for you, it's called leftist

​@@gorus6996 Wouldn't it be misogynist if you're calling someone it personally??

They do, they're called the tournament directors, but they always side witht the umpires, no matter how wrong they are.

Wow I feel sorry for the women in your life.

@@marivipalomino6975why? They’re in the kitchen, happy.

you're not making a good point by whining about that when he is quite literally correct here. that diversity hire of an umpire botched this call and everyone knows it. and being the typical woman she is, she does NOT know how to gracefully apologize and move on @@marivipalomino6975

in fact if it were a male umpire both players would have argued with him until he'd have been fined and quite possibly fired over this and he'd been made a mockery of, instead it's a woman so the liberal media has to cater to her and "empower" her, what a slap in the face to real women out there@@marivipalomino6975

I would even say C

No need to use gender specific insults

@@furincleavage8136 No need to use gender specific insults

@@jama211yes there is

​@@jama211yes there is. B and C's should stick to women tennis lol bunch of P's

WOMYN BAAAAD

@@eternalsunshine9010I agree 🤝🏻

It shouldnt be. In most racket sports, the umpire is there only for tracking the score and for when there is a disagreement between the players. In tennis its not really like this because they have line callers, but in semi pro matches with umpires present, thats how it works, just like table tennis and badmington. So in this particullar case, she shouldev only weight in if Bublik said something, other wise, her opinion should not be valid

need those diversity hires 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Speaking isn't allowed in singles matches. It's stated in the ATP rulebook. All she did was her job. Maybe some umpires would choose not to enforce that rule? A lot of fans would argue in favor of an umpire who intentionally allowed players to speak during the point. But the umpire that allows players to speak is the one not doing their job fairly, and the umpire that makes calls according to the rulebook is the one thag is doing their job fairly. Hate the rulebook, not the umpire. Maybe they can rewrite the rule so that it's not black and white? Fans would enjoy that. It would complicate the umpires job, but 🤷‍♂️

@@KoiKoy56 so you basicly saying moaning is prohibited and anyone doing that autolose.

@emraherdogan5286 nope, moaning is allowed. That said, several people have gotten warnings and VIOLATIONS for grunting too loudly/obnoxiously. Grunting is a natural occurrence, and the game of tennis would literally be over (same goes for any other sport) if grunting was not allowed. When people grunt specifically to distract an opponent, they are given a violation. As one can imagine, though, that's VERY difficult to police. For example, a controversial one is when. Nadal got a violation for what seemed like a normal grunt. Ref thought it was an intentional distraction.

Because shes a woman. They know nothing but to make a coffee

MORE EXAMPLES? Let's goooo, POST EM UP!

Just tell the umpire to give him the point

Serve it right at the ump

@brandonhenry5363. That's not correct. Partner communication is allowed even if the ball is traveling to your opponents' side of the court if the utterance is common to the game and not egregious. So things like "watch out," "cover the line," etc are perfectly legal.

I agree for the most part. I feel like it’s weird if there are female refs

​@@anponomo4207 it is...They don't know what it means to be a man, so how could they ever take reasonable decisions in a men sport.

@@LeBabo47 yeah that’s true

Incel

Because male referees/umpires never make awful decisions in sport ☕

@@jakecollins3776 it’s just a joke internet warrior 🤓

@@Pappa_Glock overplayed ass joke

​@@synersk it's not a joke. Women get too much engaged into things they don't understand

medvedev (the guy on the far side) was about to win the point when he apologized to the other guy for the shot he was about to hit. Hindrance is when someone talks during the point, and because medvedev talked, it was called hindrance. This call made no sense because medvedev would only have been distracting himself 😂

@@brandonstevens6886 thank you, seriously.

The umpire erred. You cannot hinder your opponent/distract them such as shouting before they hit the ball. Medvedev apologized but before HE hit the ball. He cannot hinder himself.

I don’t even know tennis but it looks like the girl is calling a foul because he talked even though the ball was on his side or slowly going towards him.

@@Dom-yv4nq Exactly what I thought... I heard him apologizing before hitting, but had no idea why that would be wrong. What a ridiculous decision from the umpire.

@@Blueboy1144 Yes. I'd be very interested in hearing the conversation with officials after the match. Most decisions like this are reviewed with tournament officials at the conclusion of matches.

That is a gross oversimplification of the rule and you know it

@@gwakamoley Maybe i dont and thats what my comment indicates.

​@@discoverme30 if you didn't know for sure why would you speak as if you did?

@@TBDF12 who is asking?

@@discoverme30 ?

Yeah but she forced the rule completely fault because you can only hinderance a other player and it was his shot

@@kwinten962 No talking during points.

@@miguelbarahona6636 its a hinderince call

@@kwinten962 talking between points is hindrance. You can't talk.

@@miguelbarahona6636 you know when even bublik siad to replay the pint because it was unjustified then there is something loco