The muzzle ring of fire doesn't always happen in real life

it's a little weird to compare CoD to Battlefield because Battlefield matches are so much bigger, you can't as much into it because of hardware limitations.

They still made so much details

@@Ryzot Warzone maps are huge and it's still the same

@Jach Liccroy That's such a poor comparison. CoD is a much larger franchise with a bigger player-base. And they don't even have the same style of game. Battlefield matches are huge games of Ground War, and while CoD usually does have a Ground War mode, it's hardly played because people prefer the smaller TDM or Search n Destroy

Still better thou

It’s still better since it isn’t the same game every year

@@fuma2980 bf 2042 vs cod 2019 cod will surely win and the last game also bf5 was trash but both games are different categories if you want a bf type category game you'll love bf if youll love cod type category youll love cod

COD is the best selling FPS title and 3rd best selling franchise even after the collective abomination of vanguard. I’m a battlefield fan as well, and I think that both are good in their own way. But after mw2019, cod is truly better than battlefield. MWII will blow bf again.

@@mduggy1396 mw19 was amazing and a fresh breath for the cod franchise, cold war was decent in my opinion but vanguard i did not like at all especially when it was added to wz. but hyped as hell for mwII :)

lol you got me in the first half.

Who would've thought that stripping everything out and adding in shit nobody wanted would make people hate the game. If they just did Battlefield 4 but moved the timeline up and added more reactivate maps we would love it. Or in my 35 year old mind. Just do Battlefield 2 again and let us have mod support.

@@Mirokuofnite I personally dont mind BFV. They could have just kept updating that one for all I care. I never wanted this new hot trash

LOL, for real.

xd

Bf5 was mid BF1 was fucking lit

The team behind both games were fired

@@nickbuckley4371 EA does seem to have a habit of firing or killing off teams/Studios with actual talent while keeping around those who just do what they want.

​@@nickbuckley4371 no they quit

​@@oldarthurmorgan6319 bf5 was fantastic

Thanks 👍

BFBC2, BF3, BF4 and BF1 are the real OGs

We say that BF4 were always ahead now, but BF4 was a big mess up until a year aswell. I mean the launch was extremely bad, i and many friends had many crashes up to a year after launch. BF4 now is incredible and great, but it had some really bad moments too.

Bf4 had huge bugs, glitches and optimisation issues. But the Dev team doesn’t divert from core fundamentals of a typical Bf game. But the dice team now, changed that in 2042. That’s why bf4 was a massive success even it suffered from issues. Bf2042 abandoned bf formula.

@@PrasathMGM nop, i remember bf4 has a really bad issues, worts in beta against bf2042 beta, bf4 only became a good game with years of updates

@@TorbisINACTIVE i tell people this too when they shit on bf2042, tends to make them go quiet since they realize 2042 wasnt the only terrible launch game dice did lol

They don't, these details have like 0.001% on your total experience with it, of course like you say it makes it more immersive, more believable, but jesus I find it so dumb the millions of people who use this type of videos to judge entirely a game, saying Red Dead 2 is the best game ever because they saw in some UKposts compilation that horses have balls, when meanwhile the game has a game design from 2003 and gives you a game over for even trying to flank a group of ennemies. The stupid useless shit casuals base themselves on to judge the quality of a game is unreal. I can understand appreciating all the littles details the devs took the time to put into the game, but going as far as judging an entire game only on this is something I find so dumb

You'd think but the reality is that they don't. I've played MW/warzone a lot. Barely noticed any of these things. They're pointless. Most notable imo is the weapon sling. I've never seen something more useless and by extension, detrimental to the experience. Why? Well for starters the asset is still there. There's clearly physics attached to it and there needs to be a more elaborate system in place for things to work that way. Compare that to bf 2042. It does it right. Swap to secondary and your primary despawns. Why is this right? Resources. Optimisation etc. I'd also like to point out the fact that bf 2042 has 128 players. MW doesn't even come close. Ground war is all it has basically. Warzone is different in the fact that there's definitely things left out or changed just so they can get 100 player lobbies to work properly. So in reality it's not really a 1 to 1 comparison. But yeah, there's so much detail that's just fucking irrelevant in MW. Impressive on the devs for doing that. Ultimately pointless as it doesn't make the game inherently better

@@XenonArcher You literally picked the one thing I noticed that would break immersion for me in previous games that I think actually had a point lmao

@@maybeiamepic2263 what the weapon sling thing? I mean I'd say the grenades not rolling in 2042 kinda breaks immersion, but it's also a game. Games working exactly like real life isn't always good. I've missed so many guaranteed grenade kills in CoD just by NOT using semtex (though I did get pretty good timing the fuse) And why do people use semtex? To stick? No, not really. Its cus it lands where you want it to explode and then it fucking explodes and kills the people. Not bounce and end up in a different post code or god forbid back right where it was thrown from :V

@@XenonArcher I don’t think the small details effect optimization all that much. They add to the environment and I think more devs need to try adding them in when possible because in many cases it’s eye-candy and can even add to the experience of the game. I hate to say it but COD has BF2042 beat on that aspect. Now, I think BF2042 has bigger fish to fry but that’s besides the point.

Thanks for letting me know

@@Stay_Frosty you’re welcome! Keep up the good work! I watch all your comparison videos! Love em

Just thought of this, but a sweet detail to look for would be games that have say a Glock, but then also have a like a Beretta 92FS (M9) as well. I’d be really impressed if the barrel tilts on the glock and not the beretta. That’d show that they really did their homework

Yeah I was going to comment that the Glock and 1911 both use the Browning tilting barrel. If you watch one of those guns fire in slow motion you'll see the barrel tilting.

@@chadcurtiss5965 Thank you, I thought I was the only one who noticed that about the barrel. The longer full size Glocks like the 24 I use for open competition its not as noticeable as compacts mods. Hate the triggers on them too, worked down to 1.lb target is still icky.

Absolutely!

😂 say what ya want bf3 and bf4 were peak bf. Good days was when mw3 game out with terminal and bf3 came out with high rise condos.

Absolutely agree with you. But don't forget BF1 it was also very good.

Imagine if MW2's Ground War gamemode can out-Battlefield even Battlefield 2042.

Dude I agree completely. I think many of the really good devs from Bf3 and Bf4 are gone at this point, and it’s really sad. I used to talk SO highly of DICE and now it just makes me sad

​@Nobody i mean its disappointing because cod releases every year while battle field dosent. they had more time to improve on a game than cod yet the manage to fuck it up even more

@@Legomaster0001 actually bf games have less time to develope

@@sgt3ziz794 oh my bad

@@sgt3ziz794 source?

bro who the fuck cares if you cant hear a shell bounce off a wall in bf2042, or shoot cracks into ice. it does not impact the overall game

mf sais to this day to a 2 year old game

what exactly do the other cods not "hold up to?" the animations and sound aren't as good but the new cod has much better gameplay than 2019

the game got shitted on and forgotten by warzone, it’s so sad.

same im switching to tactical shooters

@@majinbooch3787 Yes, I started playing CS:GO years ago and COD and Battlefield seem so mindless

@@andrewericson8741 true I’ve been playing ready or not but thinking about getting squad or arma for a mature battlefield like experience

You can’t trust a foreign man to do American work

Been playing bf since I was 7, over a decade of fun and great games but now I feel like they redid bf4 and made it worse with 2042😂

And got the best animator aswell.

@@ufuk5872 Hyper gets all the attention but let's not forget everyone else on the animation team that did an outstanding job.

well u cant compare 2042 to anything above potatograde and for once cod is above potatograde lol

@@trice286 I don't think without him the guns would goes the direction that it did.

​@@ufuk5872 khoa lee was the lead animator for mw2019, although i wouldn't be surprised if ranon also had an important role in the team.

Yeah, we have to wait and see the final product. Can't trust trailers from triple A studios. Elden ring was the only exception

Their one chance to encroach on battlefields main selling points.

cod19 is diff top 3 cod and i started playing since cod 5

@@MX009m I agree. The game got so much unnecessary hate. But the dlc maps got better and better and showed that they learned what the community wanted. So I hope mw2 is a more refined version because they know what works and what doesn’t. Can’t wait

@@Frank-eh3jc the reason people hated MW 2019 was because the maps were not traditional style maps (not quite 3 lanes and very open), loud footsteps, ghost always active, and the unsuppressed fire doesn't appear on the mini map as red dot. If at least the footsteps, ghost, and mini map were changed it would have been better received by an even LARGER portion of the community. The MW2 devs said they has learned from MW 2019 so hope that means fixing these things I mentioned.

Can’t forget that every WW2 weapon has a Tommy gun grip, skeletal Tommy gun grip and a skeletal or hell no stock at all!

They should have been separate weapons, you can’t just turn an AKM into an AKS-74u. That was a dumb thing about the gunsmith in my opinion.

@@luger700 it would save time grinding out a brand new gun, but I get your point, it’s a different gun not just attachments. I assume it was made for just making things simpler

@@luger700 they're literally the exact same gun, chambered in different calibers, and with different barrel length.. both are stamped sheet receivers, with the exact same design, with minimal upgrades between the akm and ak74.

@@luger700 if I take an M16, and change the upper, it can be an M4 chambered in .300blk, it can be an mk11, it can be an sr-25. they're the same gun. different iterations. how do you think they developed the ak74 series rifles? they made changes to the akm to improve performance, and versatility.

Yeah small details really should not be praised in arena shooters though where the vast majority of the playerbase will never notice. The time and resources spent on that could have been put elsewhere. For CoD that is modeling leg position and for BF that would have been better used modeling one-handed ladder climbs or rolling grenades. Likewise modeling pin deformation for BF and Car suspension and tire deflation could have been spent on weapon slings for the former and ground deformation and mobile vehicle hit markers for the latter. Point is they both put resourcs where frankly they would have been better placed and more noticed elsewhere.

@@ShiningDarknes I very much love and appreciate attention to detail myself, especially as I started on games that didn't have the luxury of minute high res details. Key word- luxury. It's not worth the price if it comes at the expense of gameplay in titles like these. I think the push for higher and higher pixel counts and fidelity make it more noticeable when those details aren't there too, which means more backlash for leaving them out. :( I think the community myself included at times and marketing from publishers have raised expectations so high the expense and risk of making these games has grown too great to achieve everything we want in a big title.

@@WhatIsSanity Look man all I want is for the damn feet to find their way onto the ground instead of levitate in the air.

@@ShiningDarknes hahahaha fair enough!

@@ShiningDarknes yeah I agree it’s pretty neat that they added those small details but the resources could have been better utilized to put forth something that would actually matter.

and BF2042 tried copying CoD and failed horribly

@@TheIceBallsGaming Ultimately I couldn't care less which one I play more either. I just want to play a good game, period.

@@notrealneverwas same here

@@TheIceBallsGaming they dont want to copy cod xD

@@Unschuldigxr but they literally did

bf never beat it in the first place, CoD has always been more popular, from the original mw series to the black ops series. + all the iconic campaigns and zombies.

@@sead6171 I'm sure they are talking about the actual game mechanics not popularity

@Hideous Gamer BF has more wannabe 'realism' players who sucked too much to play Tarkov, hence why BF exists, an easier game overall.

@@koriander.k7377 makes zero sense

@@kohlplatt5695 Yes, you too casual. Enjoy playing bugfield 2077

As well there is numbers in the hud of the game, which exist in real life..... 😆 🤣

@@domingofung ok keep saying that bf fan

@@hahabrrrrr4465 bf has numbers too you know lol. Try again

@@domingofung try again like your dad trying to make a new kid since youre a failure?

@@domingofung the fuck,Are you saying that We have HUDs Irl?

If Modern Warfare impressed you (which it should, it's pretty detailed and accurate, especially for an arcade FPS) and you have a PC, you should try Escape From Tarkov. That game has arguably the most realistic gun sounds, mechanics, attention to detail etc. But be warned, it's not a simple arcade shooter like COD. It won't hold your hand so you'll have to overcome a huge learning curve before you can actually enjoy it lol. But the guns and their mechanics are sooo satisfyingly realistic that you will not be disappointed.

Insurgency samdstorm

@@toxicgracie3772 I wouldn't say realistic, especially the sounds.

@@toxicgracie3772 arcade shooter? wtf bro lol

@@toxicgracie3772 Just gotta purchase a high end PC first. Lolz

Ayo, new video anytime soon?

animations, recoil, the punchiness of the weapon sounds. Thats about it that I can't think of

What makes the guns in mw2019 sound so good is that infinity ward actually recorded the sounds that the irl guns make and stuck them in the game, all other games just stick in computer generated gun sounds

@@nicholaspatricks8870 if only cod WW2 did the same

@@ZeroFox0013 they did the same with new cod too

Yeah bf has had that for quite some time....bf4

What, are we playing Dead by Daylight?

@@ezokyf i was thinking the same thing lol

@@ezokyf ez calm spirit value

@@Max-js1mx ye lol helps a lot

Truly we are in the dark timeline

Why do most game companies always downgrade ? Like holy shit the only thing they fucking care about is graphics and they care about it so much to the point where its required to have a decent setup to play the games properly. And not to mention the amount of fucking cash grabs in the present games

And some of the graphics aren't even good

@@Bananana4320 tru

@@Bananana4320 In Battlefield's case the attention to detail is one of the known things about Battlefield games.

Barrels are rifled? Wow so thats where 5gb went

​@@exa0710 worth it imo

one thing i did was use the muzzle break on the renetti with burst, makes it much easier to see the target

Same, too bad they took some steps backwards on Cold War and Vanguard. With 2042 being the way it is I hope MW2 delivers

@@seanpalmer3982 that mw developers(infinity ward) are different and the engine is only exclusive to them, coldwar and vanguard both different devs. So now everytime infinity ward release a cod game you will get mw engine. Like the upcoming mw2 and probably future mw3

@@AbdurRahim-ep5qv That's not true actually, Vanguard uses the MW19 engine. It was even a selling point they tried to use. Just goes to show that because you have the same engine it doesn't mean you'll have the same quality. Quality is dependent on the skill and effort the devs put it (and who's directing it of course).

@@whatm8516 yes there is a difference when you own something and use someone elses stuff and try to make it perfect, you cant ever master it never lol, mw had the best realistic sound effect any video game guns had offered, but vanguard was even worse than cw.

Well Infinity Ward all the way

Yeah and being able to pretty much make other real weapons by just gunsmith was incredible. Like the AK-47 could be turned into the 74M or even a AK-100 series as well as RK-74. And being able to make some dmr versions of assault rifle platforms was so amazing.

100% agree. Vast amount of playtime was spent tinkering with all weapons, designing them for various situations and finding new classes to explore with. I truly hope this tradition carries over to future cod titles, along with the otherworldly immersion that MW19 brought along.

Amax not good anymore

@@meowkittyplays6375 in multiplayer it’s still amazing

@@meowkittyplays6375 we were just talking about how every gun was that much okay that you could pick your favourite by the feel of the gun. And here you come "BuT AmAX NOt gOOd ANyMoRe"🥴🥴🤡

Well they slacked off and didn't use its full potential.

I feel that it's not about the engine its about the people working on that engine, the team that worked on previous games are not around anymore and it clearly shows.

Implying that BF1 which also uses Frostbite doesnt look 10x better than BF2042 lol

@@AvieRaptor bf1 still looks better than 2042

frostbite's biggest limitation is how hard it is to use if you are new to the engine.

Not even op but useful against those ladder campers.

I’ve used it quite a few times. Nobody expects a Desert Eagle to the face when standing in front of what should be an empty ledge. Very useful against campers on Rammaza.

@Dale Macarenait's in MP and Warzone

Fun fact, if you choose a skin that has a pistol (like the Ghost skin) even if you don't have a pistol equipped in your secondary slot, your character will pull out the pistol on their skin. You only get 1 mag though.

You actually very vulnerable while using the ladder. It's useful for getting the drop on a player though

That’s the point that the video makes

Yikes it's not that good Lol

@@Rilez616 Best COD since OG MW.

@@only1dirtymouf lol

@@Rilez616 it is

@Vulcan yikes battlefield is even worse

Except gameplay wise

@@Ryan-GosIing Cope

@@FadazMada You were born after Black Ops 2. Kiddo.

@@Raul_Menendez I'm older than your dad kid

@@FadazMada which is probably why you think the gameplay of MW19 is good, it’s literally made for campers and bad players.

or Lugers and C96s!

More proof that the hi point is the best gun ever made #teamproblemsolva

So is it a safety mechanism?

@@rileyflint1619 an important part of a semi automatic pistols design is keeping the slide and barrel together for long enough for the explosion from the cartridge to dissipate. Otherwise you get the action (slide of the handgun in this case) opening pre-maturely and that explosion can split shell cases, shoot fire/unburnt powder out of the ejection port. For low powered ammunition (generally 380 acp and down from there), the weight of the slide and the strength of the recoil spring are enough to keep the action (slide) closed for safe operation. This is referred to as a straight blowback gun. Once you hit 9mm and above, the slide and recoil spring are generally not strong enough to keep the action closed for long enough for safe operation, unless you make the spring way stronger and the slide way heavier. Since making the spring way stronger and slide way heavier is impractical as it makes the gun heavier and harder to operate, alternative systems were designed to keep the action closed for that split second longer for the explosion to happen, essentially adding a bit of mechanical resistance into the mix. That mechanical resistance in handguns is also referred to as “locked breach”. There are several types of mechanical resistance designs. The most popular of which is a John Moses Browning (best gun designer of all time, in many peoples opinion) tilting barrel design. As the gun is fired, the barrel and slide are locked together until a cam tilts the barrel up as you see in the video game animation. That slows down the opening of the action just enough to contain the explosion and make the gun safe to shoot. Rifles also have similar systems that accomplish the same thing (I could go into more detail on rifles bc they are a bit different, but this comment is long enough). Long story short, it is a safety mechanism. Otherwise you could get burns or worse the gun could batter itself to death or explode in your hands, or a case rupture could occur. Always wear hearing and eye protection when shooting guns of any type.

@@bannedbycommieyoutube5time920 that makes a lot more sense thanks for breaking it down for me man👌

I remember playing Bad Company 1 and 2 back in the day and being blown away by how I could manipulate and destroy the map as a player. Even Battlefield 3 had that to some extent. With each passing game it just gets less and less and to me the destruction and ability to change the map with player choice was what made Battlefield fun and unique. Yes stuff like blowing up the building in Rush in BC2 to advance the objective was not very balanced, but it was also unique and fun in its own way.

MWII has ground war, and the maps are actually dedicated to the mode instead of being taken from a larger map like in MW19.

To be fair, the jump from bad company 2 to battlefield 3 in regards to enviromental destruction was depression in a literal sense and they still never redemed themselves

​@@SolisFactor nice

They made this game when the pandemic was still big

It also allows the barrel lugs to lock and unlock to the slide.

🤓 🤓

Im waiting for someone to do a "So Basicly" so I can understand it easier

@@ghostface6947 that must be how u see everyone

@@fireflydies807so basically pull top back is hard, tilt helps (its hard to simplify it)

I mean, it does inherently help with feeding in pistols because the feed ramp doesn't reach the magazine until the barrel travels into position as the slide goes rearwards. You are 100% correct, the primary design feature was tilt barrel lockup while the feed ramps were designed as such to account for the travel required to free up the slide.

the M1911 did this right?

​​@@catf4077 yep! it was one of the first to do it and nowadays, almost every pistol design has that Browning tilting action included! it's pretty amazing how well John Browning designed guns that we're still using his designs and his guns even to this day over 110 years ago! 😁👌🏻

Its almost like a gun simulator built into a cod game, I cant for mw2, gonna be sat in a custom match inspecting every gun

@@oidowell5940 😂😂

It raised the bar for CoD, not for other games though.

Daniel Gandara none has surpassed battlestate in gun detailing, and its an indie studio.

@@DCGMatthew1 and so far, treyarch and sledgehammer games has failed to keep up

Hyper, one of the MW animators, actually made an animation joking about flicking the cylinder shut. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/f5-Hgal7cG2au40.html

Idk if that’s a detail and more of a style choice tbh

this was one of my top reasons that stopped me from playing warzone after CW integration, CW and Vanguard were really way behind MW19 dev team in almost every aspect, i hope MW2 has the same feel of MW19 or better.

Not only that but they had gun UKpostsrs like T.Rex Arms help them with animations.

@@iiFuture I played through the campaign, and afterwards thought about it, the reload animations felt SO familiar......true as nuts, there was his name in the credits. Can't escape the Robotkin.

@@MX009m I still use MW guns from time to time. Most MW guns feel super crisp while some Vanguard guns feel like I am shooting water despite being much stronger. Their agency is to change the gun balance to sell their games and 30$ skins, that is why VG guns are buffed while MW guns are literally made unplayable.

@@SkynetGeneral yeah, the vantard weapons have next to no recoil (can't remember the name but there's this assault rifle that doesn't move at all and fires at the same rate as the MP5).

And a BF game from 2018 is better than COD 2019 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/b3Wfa62tnX-qwIE.html

No lmao MW9 was beaten by BFV ukposts.info/have/v-deo/b3Wfa62tnX-qwIE.html Thèse 2 released closer together than 2042

It's like 2042 was created by AI. It's off on so many levels. It's a clean and sterilized imitation of a Battlefield game, with Specialists added because the AI knows how much human gamers love Specialists.

Can't leave out Bad Company 2 aswell. It was the Battlefield that introduced me to the series and omg was it so good 😊 And honestly, as goofy as Hardline was, it was still a solid game. I had a TON of fun with it personally, even if it wasn't the prototypical Battlefield. Also BF1 was very solid. BFV is where things started to go downhill and now BF2042 is at the bottom of that hill lol

@@MrTickleBean spot on mate... well ive not even played the new map on 2042 yet. might have a look see whats up.. we can only hope..

@@MrTickleBean 2042 being put together by mostly AI makes too much sense lmao. The game's art direction is all over the place, feeling like random assets from different artists with different styles being thrown together with lighting that does not fit with anything, like ain't no way an AAA dev team run by humans can be THAT dumb. Stuff like Anthem which was basically one of the worst thing ever atleast had good art direction and stayed consistent in terms of visuals

Sadly I think MW2 this year will have the same issue tbh. Warzone will definitely tie into the game still. It’s a shame really, I’m spoiled by my PS5 having games with file sizes half the size of those on other platforms or even just the last gen version of the game.

@@GabrielIgnacio Why would warzone be tied, they said that’s not the case.

@@LaggingDuck- they said that with respect to current Warzone - likely because the overall menu containing MW2019 and Cold War and Vanguard is too crowded and is convoluted. I have absolutely no doubt that when Warzone 2.0 releases it will be a required download to be able to play MW2022. Activision uses technicalities like that all of the time so when they do the same shit again they’re technically not lying.

"realism shooter" homie this is a arcade shooter a realism shooter would be Tarkov Arma Squad etc.

I'd bet money that mw2 will be at least 90 to 100 gigs on launch day lol

2042 ruined that lead.

@@SHAHDIFMDKF Honestly, 5 did it first.

@@aveteranplayer6403 nah. Atleast that game wasnt that much of a downgrade compared to 20-42 fps. 2042 is just next level shit

@@aveteranplayer6403 No. BFV’s was superior to even 1 in terms of small details, animations, graphics etc… BFV was criticized for things like the customization but in terms of mechanics it’s incredible. BFV beats The shit out of any cod in comparisons, you should watch some. It even Beats 1.

@@aveteranplayer6403 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/b3Wfa62tnX-qwIE.html everyone in the comments is saying that MW doesn’t even come close to BFV now so trashing on what you don’t know.

Sad how we go from the amazing BF 1 to BF 2042

Wich one do you prefer?

@@TheManWhoErasedHisNane amazing was BF4, 2042 is just a shameless cash grab that I noticed before buying.

If people can shoot through walls than what's the point for cover? At lest if the wall broke so I can see I'm being shot through the wall.

Well, in previous BF titles, you were able to shoot through thin walls. I don't know if all walls are impenetrable on 2042 though since I barely played it.

You say that as if because it came out 2 years later they should be more capable of adding details ?

@@Rilez616 looking at what your competitors are doing and improving or expanding on that should be a no brainer, especially if your IP has a reputation for being more detailed.

And not to mention MW came out on older consoles than BF 2042

I wish dice wasn't completely fucking stupid with the marketing. I personally don't care they showed a woman (shocker i know) with a prosthetic. However when you go on rants about inclusivity then we have a problem. The reason you put the woman there is tokenism. They could have it be like Wolfenstein where it's an alternate universe WW2 and i don't think there would've been much backlash.

Yes but a Battlefield from 2017 had better details than both me 2019 and Battlefield 2042, same with Battlefield V

He even does meme gun animations on his UKposts channel

They also hired the second best firearm animator on the planet. They have both Hyper and MrBrightside now. MrBrightside did all the weapon animations for Insurgency Sandstorm. The two are best friends and use to stream them animating weapons back in the day. Awesome to see them working together now.

and also this is the first time that DICE didn't even tried. This is not the DICE we used know of.

@@SeaGLGaming thats a pretty neat story

@@ariaseraj4005 sad,but true

Bf1, Mw2019, Mw2 best console shooters ever Anyone who disagrees, 1v1 me in Microsoft flight simulator

@@Me-Dwight I don't disagree, but i wanna 1v1 you in MFS

Nice joke

@@slayed9602 how

@@Me-Dwight idk if i can call mw2019 the best if the maps are the bane of my existence

No it won’t, the engine feels like garbage, no amount of remade content will fix the horrible gameplay

BF1 not that good, sorry. Gunplay is simply awful

Nothing can save this crap, main team is working on new BF, 2042 have a small team to push small content, sorry but all ppl whi purchased this crap been fooled. Again after BF5.

People said "the only thing that will save this game is Portal" months ago when the game came out. The game was not saved, and won't ever be. I think people need to accept that.

@@azazel673 Nah BF1 was solid, different, but solid.

But the recoil is so not realistic!

​@@biopower5160 on the contrary, it seems about right, having shot my fair share of rifles, sidearms and shotguns I can safely say I see nothing too off about it.

As far as I know, all the animations in MW are hand crafted, which is very impressive, considering the quality.

Yeah I was so pleasantly surprised when I first saw it, no more weirdly fluid COD reloads, another game that does it well is Insurgency Sandstorm

*sensitivity 1000 player enters chat*

If mw2 2022 Become a Success (beside Ppl Will Find a Way To complain Cause its a Cod game)..Than Cod Should stay as Modern era Military game..That's really suits better with Cod now cause ww2 Fps games are milked afs

Jdm gang

Would you say that it did deliver?

@@thecarsavant nop

@@thecarsavant it's like MW19, b u t w o r s e

You can’t peek doors in 2042

@@gabrielhowes4702 yes that's what they said

Not to defend them, but the primer marks are purely aesthetic while rolling grenades and peeking doors affect gameplay. They could be design decisions, intentionally not coding those features in because they thought they negatively affected gameplay. Who knows... but they are more than just details.

@Roy Dunno man, after all happened I don't think that they will make the game so good that it will have the amount of players it had at launch again.

The recent updates has rly improved the game tho, I too felt so disappointed with the state of the game’s release but the recent updates has gave me a reason albeit a small slither of hope that bf2042 will become a good game, its just taking too much time to get there😂

Just like hope that they make a better game after bfv right ? BF won't be better anymore it only will be worse.

Not to battlefield but to shooters in general this game was suppose to resurrect shooters again especially since all 3 games were coming out in the same year turns out vanguard was just a boring copy and paste only made for warzone like Cold War, halo being good but super dry and empty and battlefield just being such a buggy mess that missed out on a lot of things from battlefield along with changes no one wanted besides from player count and map size everyone asked for it and now we regret it

@@pp-xz7rx BF5 was an absolute blast for me and in terms of gunplay and movement it was better than the previous title even though the atmosphere and ambiance picked with BF1 imo. Also, BF5 could go under a large level of destruction and the details they showed were very impressive.

As someone with over 300 hours in MW in the last year and 8 hours in BF2042, I’ve got to say whilst BF is a lot of fun, MW makes you feel *in* the game, which BF fails to do. The guns feel cartoonish in BF but in MW the feel like a genuine firearm, making it more immersive and overall a more enjoyable game

@@SovietAirCon goddamn bro 300 hours?

@@SovietAirCon For me MW 2 was pinecal of shooter games, yeah black ops 1 was fun and good but certainly not on that lvl

until you relaod it and it magically fills

@@EzMatt90 what do you mean ?

@@Cockalicious Possibly a reference to older animations. _Where they take the same Mag out of view, then just reinsert it._

@@Cockalicious well in real life or even more realistic games like arma, each magazine is a separate count of bullets. so if you reload before the magazine is empty, then that magazine stays having that many bullets in it. so if you load that magazine back in later on it might only be half full. makes you think twice before reloading a mag that isnt empty.

And the m4a1

Funny that they even know the difference in caliber these days. They used to call 5.45×39mm weapons submachine guns. Even fucked up the name of that specific weapon to this day.

@@Evokyr what’s the weapon