Cities at Sea: How Aircraft Carriers Work
Переглядів 13,754,602
5 років томуSign up for free at Brilliant.org/Wendover
The first 200 to use that link will also get 20% off their annual premium subscription
Subscribe to Half as Interesting (The other channel from Wendover Productions): / halfasinteresting
Get the Wendover Productions t-shirt: standard.tv/collections/wendo...
Check out my personal channel: / @samfromwendover993
Support Wendover Productions on Patreon: / wendoverproductions
UKposts: / wendoverproductions
Instagram: / wendover.productions
Twitter: / wendoverpro
Email: sam@wendover.productions
Reddit: / wendoverproductions
References:
[1] scienceblogs.com/gregladen/20...
[2] web.archive.org/web/201809061...
[3] www.globalsecurity.org/milita... www.parisaeroport.fr/docs/defa...
[4] www.navy.mil/navydata/ships/c...
[5] nationalinterest.org/blog/the...
[6] web.archive.org/web/201201190...
[7] nimitznews.wordpress.com/2017...
[8] www.embraercommercialaviation...
[9] nationalinterest.org/blog/buz...
[10] www.popularmechanics.com/mili...
Animation by Josh Sherrington and Jorrit van Ginnkel (createjor.nl)
Sound by Graham Haerther (www.Haerther.net)
Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster
Special thanks to Patreon supporters Alec M Watson, Andrew J Thom, Arkadiy Kulev, Chris Allen, Chris Barker, Connor J Smith, Daddy Donald, Etienne Dechamps, Eyal Matsliah, Hank Green, Harrison Wiener, James Hughes, James McIntosh, John & Becki Johnston, Keith Bopp, Kelly J Knight, Ken Lee, Kyle, KyQuan Phong, Manoj Kasyap Govindaraju, MyNameIsKir, Plinio Correa, Qui Le, Sheldon Zhao, Simen Nerleir, and Tim Robinson
Music by epidemicsound.com
Select footage courtesy the AP Archive
@JiajuChen 3 роки тому
World's strongest airforce: US airforce World's second strongest airforce: US Navy
@legitimate_opposition2002 3 роки тому
* incoming angry Europeans*
@invalid8774 3 роки тому
@@legitimate_opposition2002 *laughs in european* we dont waste our money on useless things like that. We have a health care system, public education, properer(ish) democracy and overall a higher quality of life. Europe surely isnt without its problems but we surely arent envy on the US military, else wed have a bigger one. The EU has the higher GDP and the higher man power. If we wanted, we could outpay you. But we dont and so we wont. And Im glad for that. But good luck with investing in death, from what I know, it has a horrible return on investment.
@legitimate_opposition2002 3 роки тому
@@invalid8774 Europe’s turning into a shit hole 😭😭😭 thanks for the paragraph buddy
@legitimate_opposition2002 3 роки тому
@@invalid8774 Also, wasting your money on useless things could’ve possibly saved your ass’ in WW2
@invalid8774 3 роки тому
@@legitimate_opposition2002 lol no EU was a shithole and still is a shithole but it gets better. USA is going nosedive down. And welcome in the 21st century, the war was 80 years ago and you have more nazis than us. Better make sure theyre armed for their next genocide.
@treenoises8009 3 роки тому
aircraft carrier 's list to do: -deployment - training - chilin - *flex*
@andrewmoore7022 3 роки тому
You forgot humanitarian aid and natural disaster relief
@treenoises8009 3 роки тому
@@andrewmoore7022 *deployment*
@meixizou86 3 роки тому
large percentage of it is flex i think.
@idontknowyouitseems_4370 3 роки тому
100% Flex. Rest others.
@womble3383 3 роки тому
PROFIT
@Kevin-fj5oe 3 роки тому
"...That aircraft carrier with all their defenses, are not as unsinkable as some may say" Well, there's a reason why they have 11 carriers
@jonathansalvador5037 3 роки тому
So they can deploy them to multiple locations at once, and have carriers on standby to fill in for others in dock for repairs and maintenance. (Yes I know you were joking.)
@DrJohnnyJ 3 роки тому
Aircraft carriers are a waste and everybody knows it. One nuclear pulse from a ballistic missile and the whole group is useless. They are just the Navy's way to get promotions and budgets. They never fight. When Trump tried to threaten N. Korea, the only carrier we had in the Pacific ran away. During the peak of the cold war, we had three. Now that they are useless, we have 11. 12?
@NautilusSSN571 2 роки тому
And there's a reason why they travel with other 5 ships
@keithcline2280 2 роки тому
@@DrJohnnyJ you are seriously delusional. No facts in anything you just spewed.
@blacklabel130 2 роки тому
@kevin your logic is garbage, even the one down corrected you, they are supported by 5 other ship that are good at different defense for your carrier, anyway 1 submarine and all your 11 carrier are fuckin down
@foxtrotdeltausn4757 2 роки тому
They can go faster than 35 MPH although I am sure their actual top speed is classified. When I was in Japan we escorted a carrier out of port. Our patrol boats maxed out at a certian speed greater than 35 knots and the carrier left us behind when we reached open water. 35knots>35MPH
@lorekeeper685 2 роки тому
They go slower than their cap since boat starts breaking up
@JohnSmith-iw9bs 2 роки тому
top speed is actually around 75 MPH in full steam making a wake 5 Miles long behind the ship
@jamesporter. Рік тому
exactly, our carriers are the fastest boats in the navy, with the nuclear power... they also can go that speed indefinitely. Like John Smith said, its more like 70-75 mph.... Which is just insane with how big it is
@foxtrotdeltausn4757 Рік тому
@@lorekeeper685 what?
@matthew9677 Рік тому
@@foxtrotdeltausn4757 the carrier going full speed, will outrun its carrier strike group
@digitalranger4259 4 роки тому
You didn't mention the role carriers play in disaster relief: When hurricanes hit the Caribbean, a carrier was wired to a grid to provide power, and the desalinization plant onboard provided water.
@switchplayer1016 4 роки тому
@jweltsch22 you said airport and now I have an image in my head of a 747 being yeeted off the flight deck with its launching catapults.
@TViper2369 4 роки тому
@@switchplayer1016 Clearly too big, but they have landed and launched C-130's off of a carrier in the past.
@arthas640 4 роки тому
The 3rd largest city in my state and one of its main ports (im not sure how many people lived there at the time but theres over 200k living there now) had a major power outage once due to some power plants being knocked out, so they literally hooked an aircraft carrier up to the power grid and powered most of the city with it.
@switchplayer1016 4 роки тому
@@arthas640 thank you US navy for providing ships that do double duty as both portable neuclear reactor systems and desolisation machines.
@jamescooper7878 3 роки тому
being an attack carrier like in the WW2 is more of a 2nd role today, while search and rescue/ disaster relief is more like 1th role
@SMATF5 4 роки тому
I was stationed on USS Nimitz from 2006-2011, in the electrical division of the engineering department. I worked on lighting and electrical systems all over the ship, so I got to know it really well. It's so much larger and more complex than it seems from the outside; the interior of a carrier is like an ant hill, especially below the main deck. I still have dreams where I'm going through hangar bays, ladder wells, machinery spaces, pump rooms, bilges, etc.
@danielbrofford3885 4 роки тому
SMATF5 thank you sailor for your service. We patriots admire and appreciate you more then you know. You guys & gals are my hero’s.
@mrnewskin7831 4 роки тому
To bad all u s aircraft carriers can get wiped out with one missile from either China or Russia. And we have nothing to stop them. We are so behind.
@patrickbrinkmeier1858 4 роки тому
@@mrnewskin7831 , keep dreaming about Russian and Chinese capabilities. Just last week Russia tested a cruise missile that they want to use to target American Carriers. The damn thing exploded with its nuclear reactor and not only killed 5 of the scientists developing it but caused the worst Russian Nuclear accident since Cherynobil. Remember Russia and China is still more then 15 years behind us in all technology
@cancelanime1507 4 роки тому
Imagine how a space battleship would look like!
@davishatler1874 4 роки тому
SMATF5 I used to have a recurring dream where I went through many, many rooms in my grandparents house, which I perceived as being humongous
@roscojenkins7451 2 роки тому
My uncle was an officer on the USS Carl Vinson. He gave my mom sis and me a tour of it. I remember seeing the anchor on the outside and thinking it was so small (in comparison) During the tour we ended up in the room that houses the anchor chain. Each chain link was as big as me. That was insanely cool
@cloudbroken 2 роки тому
Crazy part is where the full length of that massive anchor chain goes inside the ship -- two giant wells that go down the full height of the ship. I remember watching a tiny deck sailor get lowered into one via harness so she could clean the bottom. Scary business.
@BJBDF Рік тому
I was on the USS Independence CV-62. Our anchors weighed 30 tons each and the chains had 350 links that weighed 360 pounds per link.
@brad144k Рік тому
I used to paint that anchor. And drive that ship lol
@brad144k Рік тому
I wouldn't say the links were as big as you but definitely heavier than you. 350lbs
@BJBDF Рік тому
@@brad144k If you painted the anchor, you sure as fuck did not drive the ship. And your next comment is just stupid, and makes no sense.
@lawrencelewis8105 3 роки тому
as an ex-navy man I can say that the way aircraft carriers work is first, they must be able to float.
@sagebiddi Рік тому
If Poseidon finds out that you said "ex" it's gone be some drama ....from one sailor to another _sailor_
@elscruffomcscruffy8371 Місяць тому
Unbelievable. You could convince millions and run for President
@jutea9858 4 роки тому
My teacher said the biggest aircraft carrier of USA is Japan，although it can't move,it is really good.
@danielearl3591 4 роки тому
It was Australia 75 years ago >:(
@yuvrajshah1158 4 роки тому
There was also the UK in WW2. That is the country where the American, Canadian, Australian, British and many other nation’s militaries gathered for D-day
@espedro65 4 роки тому
It was Philippines b4 they have the biggest US military facilities outside America
@arthas640 4 роки тому
@@danielearl3591 we pulled out most of our bases when your army beat the japanese but lost against emus
@Botchewlism 4 роки тому
It technically move considering tectonic plates
@ppslayergod69xd96 4 роки тому
Anything in France: *is built* Their builders: *You'll be a Charles de Gaulle*
@switchplayer1016 4 роки тому
@Norm T I wonder if naming anything after Napolean would cause an uproar.
@paulhetherington3854 4 роки тому
Anything-- isn't a verb, or subject-- in US English. Political microlog.
@franzwetrfres2116 4 роки тому
@@paulhetherington3854 *nor, not 'or' in your sentence.
@supersayan8951 4 роки тому
I think we just took to long to find a name and we were like, lets just take that name
@arthas640 4 роки тому
For a country with such a looooong history of going to war with every motherfucker in the room you think the French could think of more than 1 war hero to name shit after. At least the US has the excuse of being relatively young, only becoming a major power in the last 150 years and for most of its recorded history it was only a backwater collection of disjointed settlements. France was famous for its warriors since the days of Rome, yet they name everything after a dude that died so recently there are plenty of people on this site that remember him making the news.
@chrism6904 3 роки тому
WTF Im blown away that people can buy things online and have it shipped to them on an AIRCRAFT CARRIER. That is awesome!
@brad144k Рік тому
I used to have protein and different snacks sent to my carrier. Family would send "care packages."
@jamesmontgomery3818 2 роки тому
For your end of video question, my thoughts on what I know about the doors are: If the statement is false, with current supplied information we can't correctly infer the safety of either door. Logically the information that the statement is false doesn't point to a specific point of the statement, just the statement as a whole. So if the statement "If this door is safe, the other door is deadly" is false, it could mean "If this door is safe, the other door is safe." Thus both doors could be safe. It could also read, "If this door is deadly, the other door is deadly", in which case both doors are deadly. Logically I'd leave the doors alone, because deadly is an absolute that I wouldn't gamble a 50/50 on.
@pleaseendmethx9455 2 роки тому
Good idea, I’ll bet someone wants you going and seeing what’s in the first door with the funny writing on it 🤨 I’m not sure I can infer anything other than it’s definitely a trap for you. But then, 50/50 isn’t that bad of odds really in the cosmological schemes of things, I’d say…
@danielhale1 2 роки тому
I reached the same conclusion: Either both doors are safe, or both are deadly. If you can safely inspect one to see if passing through will be safe or deadly (for example, tossing a frog through), you'll know the state of the other.
@user-xy4ry1lt6n 2 роки тому
@@danielhale1 was that a reference to the witch's house? cause if it was, props to you
@danielhale1 2 роки тому
@@user-xy4ry1lt6n I forget the name of the show, but it was indeed a reference to an episode I saw years ago. They're confronted with two doors and two frogs as guardians, one always lies and the other always tells the truth. One door leads to safety, the other to death. The guy has had it up to here, so he grabs a frog and tosses it through a door, causing it to burst into flames. He slams the door and says "welp, it wasn't that one!".
@Darkfyreofthezenith 2 роки тому
@@danielhale1 Actually, you can't say that with confidence. The sign states that "If door A is safe, door B is deadly" Assuming that is true, there are two options for door A. Option 1: Door A is safe, therefore Door B is deadly Option 2: Door A is deadly, and we therefore know nothing about Door B because the sign only provides information on the situation if Door A is Safe. Based on that, if we know the sign is False, then we can say Option 1: Door A is Safe and Door B is safe. Option 2: Door A is Deadly and we still no nothing about door B. If you must choose a door in this case, choose Door B as in any situation where Door A is Safe, Door B is also safe, but there are cases where Door b is safe and Door A is not.
@romantisanon4647 4 роки тому
We need Seacraft Carriers: large cities flying in the sky that drop boats at strategic locations.
@hibiki9380 4 роки тому
brilliant idea, we should be able to deploy a country by a country carrier 2100
@Feeshyenjoyer 4 роки тому
Hibiki I mean if you can make a boat the size of vieques you could absolutely send a fucking city filled with nukes and planes basically anywhere
@plasticballs 4 роки тому
and the boats are aircraft carriers
@turian1moose 4 роки тому
Somebody give this man a medal
@rea280 4 роки тому
Darkwarrior0920 and why would you need to have a aircraft carrier the size of a city carrying nuclear warheads that would put warning bells on everyone’s radar and you would get a sanction by other country’s we have ICBMs for a reason
@martyzeenyc1210 4 роки тому
“Sailors can even order packages online, to their ship.” Alright, lemme pull out Uber eats.
@itsmekrazyb 4 роки тому
No don't wait *Do IT*
@themartin5122 4 роки тому
Shipping a shipment to the ship
@Bravo_08 4 роки тому
F-18 with the uber eats logo just lands in front of you
@flurry2694 4 роки тому
Rest in pieces uber eats guy
@cosmicpotato3849 3 роки тому
*guy on a jet ski with Uber logo slowly appears over the horizon*
@JB-cg8jr 3 роки тому
I lived on one for 5 yrs 97-02. Was able to launch off of and land on it once in the C2 plane this video talked about. Was great experience in my younger days.
@jaygreider4753 3 роки тому
I served on the USS Forrestal (CVA-59) - '70-'74. Was a radioman.
@redmax3471 2 роки тому
Thanks for your service! I served USS Midway CVA-43 '71'. AK3
@acupofwater8020 2 роки тому
Thank you for your service.
@zacharyingham638 2 роки тому
An under appreciated position. Communication is possibly the most important element on the battlefield.
@aidanw9378 4 роки тому
Something: exists France: let's name it Charles De Gaulle
@jasonirwin4631 4 роки тому
@War Never Changes I think a Joan of arc air craft carrier would be pretty cool.
@SpiritOfFire88L 4 роки тому
@@jasonirwin4631 I agree with you.
@mississippirebel1409 4 роки тому
Charles De Gualle was nothing more than self absorbed idiot. Wait a second that sounds like most French people lol.
@mrjohnbrush 4 роки тому
@@jasonirwin4631 France had an helicopter carrier named Jeanne d'Arc. But yeah, an aircraft carrier with that name would sound cool.
@randallgoguen3463 4 роки тому
@@mississippirebel1409 But Trump is nothing more than a self absorbed idiot.
@soulassassin0g 3 роки тому
US Gov.: "So how many carriers are you going to build?" US Navy: "Yes."
@chefgiovanni 3 роки тому
Great video here, thanks for sharing all this info. Thank you to all who serve.
@piotrd.4850 3 роки тому
Actually, in case of carriers and e.g. C-17 it is the other way round.... USAF repeatedly said "please staph" on C-17 delivery...
@martiddy 3 роки тому
Navy: As many as possible!
@ramgaming9475 3 роки тому
US Navy: enough to empire world
@arpansarkar174 3 роки тому
@@chefgiovanni why don't you just comment your opinion and not ruin the reply section?
@user-fp1go9fl7n 3 роки тому
This really reminds me of the Battleships game I sometimes used to play as a child. I've always never liked the aircraft carriers because they're the largest and probably easiest to spot. It also felt pretty bad when someone else sunk it. Thanks for the great video.
@gemman1 2 роки тому
I was a Navy Photographer on board the USS Nimitz from 1979 to 1982... Got to see a lot of Europe, The Middle East and the Ocean..lol
@FLATSTONE 5 років тому
7:47 when you're a break dancer but you wanna serve your country.
@esatd34 5 років тому
Was looking for this
@kfoster3616 5 років тому
That person was so cool
@ozzzey6371 5 років тому
IKR lol
@tanner_R80 5 років тому
I knew someone was gonna day something about that😂
@filmfan885 5 років тому
😂😂😂👌🏽
@evaristegalois6282 5 років тому
*_RealLifeLore = Toyota Corolla_* *_Wendover Productions = Aircraft_*
@vtron9832 5 років тому
Greatest trend of STEM channels
@cookinwithlil6549 5 років тому
Yesssssssssssss
@mickeyg7219 5 років тому
For those who got these two channels mixed up.
@Ypog_UA 5 років тому
real engineering = rocket
@ON-YT 5 років тому
this guy get's it
@j-dog7767 3 роки тому
8:54 I love how even when Americans are on the bridge of an aircraft carrier they're still wearing their baseball caps.
@keithashline505 3 роки тому
That's because they're on their " on-duty " statues.
@CarterWills1 3 роки тому
Because they are being recorded
@michaelmappin4425 2 роки тому
Ball caps or covers are part of the Navy's working uniform. When a carrier is at sea, the cap is considered as a foreign object debris (FOD) that could ruin a jet engine so they aren't allowed on the flight deck. They also aren't required anywhere else except on the bridge where they are mandatory just for entry. As a flight deck guy that sometimes had to go on the bridge, I would have to make a long trip to my locker to get a cap and then make a long trip up to the bridge.
@MrJimheeren 2 роки тому
@@michaelmappin4425 why didn’t you put your cap in a pocket or something. Seems like a lot of work to walk to your bunk just to get your hat
@michaelmappin4425 2 роки тому
@@MrJimheerenflight deck guys would normally never need a ball cap at sea. In fact, they are considered FOD (foreign object debris) around aircraft. We look forward to getting underway and locking that cap up for the entire time. It's only to get a working over the side chit or a crunch report signed that we would ever go up there.
@trooper9739 2 роки тому
I love how you state your sources clearly. So many people don’t and it leads to massive misinformation.
@cccplt 5 років тому
I work on those supply ships! Fun fact: they are all operated by civilians! Glad to see some appreciation!
@deathbunny1718 5 років тому
@lilbeserk most are civilians though these ships are armed and tend to have retired military personnel on for security. the reason for this that companies will send goods for cheap , and supply ships are not near the fleet for long since the supply ships go for refuel and pick up of new supplies.
@notforgotten3685 5 років тому
@Chuck Taylor no it's true. They use the designation USNS instead of USS in the U.S Navy.
@asasial1977 5 років тому
Funny, every onrep I was ever involved it was from a Navy supply ship
@oscaramador4200 5 років тому
How could one work in one of those?
@rbrick3685 5 років тому
deathbunny Depends on the AOR. Fifth fleet has military personnel pulling security.
@KelchanFerret 5 років тому
On a modern US Carrier, the superstructure, known as the "island," has about 6 decks that view the flight deck: The lowest one, which is at flight deck level, is where the movement officer is stationed, who is responsible for coordinating aircraft movement on the flight deck. Two levels above that, is an enclosed platform where a camera is mounted that gives a panoramic view of the flight deck, and is used for supervising and recording all aircraft operations. Directly above that is the Flag Bridge, then the actual Bridge, and at the top of the superstructure is the Control tower, who coordinates launching and recovering aircraft.
@vangehernandesfrancisco3422 5 років тому
Peso
@appss2277 5 років тому
KelchanFerret qaq
@spatsky 5 років тому
Babylon falling Israel didn’t want the US to know how they will execute Operation Focus. If the US knew, a slip of intelligence may squeak out to the Arab league. There were many different scenarios that could compromise the operation. At the time, Iran could’ve sided with the Arabs that would’ve made religion more of the reason to defeat Israel. Iran already acquired American military hardware by 1967. Maybe the Israelis knew the capabilities of the F4 Phantom better than America did. At the time, Israel were using the Mirage fighter which took on the role of both tactical aerial dog fighter and bomber. F4 was a high altitude interceptor that can easily look down and shoot down the Mirages and also a very proficient attack bomber. I’m guessing the Iranians had something to do with why the Liberty was attacked. Research vessels gather information and radio waves. Mossad had their reasons but the reason can be that they exercised complete black out of any form of intelligence leading to the day of the attack.
@bricefleckenstein9666 3 роки тому
USS Ranger had 7 decks above flight deck level - but the 0-10 level was fully enclosed so it might not count for your statement.
@jaygreider4753 3 роки тому
I was a cryptographer. I was on the O-11 level. Nothing up there but a tiny crypto room and antennas. USS Forrestal (CVA-59).
@deandre2680 2 роки тому
I heard every time a US Aircraft Carrier gets destroyed, the US makes 3 more.
@draheim90 2 роки тому
Just ask Japan.
@incompleteriver770 2 роки тому
“Cut of one head 14 more will take its place” - Some Admiral probably
@AnimaRandom Рік тому
basically what japan sees during ww2: Japan: so..ok..The only Remaining aircraft carrier they have is USS Enterprise and it sank Japan: wait..what do you mean she survive Japan: wait... Saratoga is back? Japan: Wait..what do you mean Enterprise have Steam catapults and newer aircrafts Japan: WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY HAVE NEW CLASS CALLED ESSEX CLASS Japan: *WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY CREATED 32 ESSEX CLASS CARRIERS???!!!*
@burnssy112 Рік тому
One of my high school teachers was a freshly new commissioned Lt. from the naval academy that served on the Enterprise during Vietnam. He always talked about how young he was and was in charge of up to 1000 sailors in the boiler rooms on the carrier. His navy sea stories were always the best!
@InvertedGigachad 4 роки тому
I find it so cool that a carrier literally has hangars below its deck. I used to think that all aircraft would be stored on the deck, I didn´t think about the carrier having space for even more aircraft. So you imagine my face of disbelief when I played the carrier mission in BF4
@bricefleckenstein9666 3 роки тому
All "by design" aircraft carriers have had dedicated hanger decks. Most conversion designs like the Langley did as well.
@a_slime. 5 років тому
0:55 A wild UK carrier appears 🤔
@mrcaboosevg6089 5 років тому
I noticed that, he may have just forgot about them since they're not really in use yet. Gonna be a good few years until the British carriers become fully operational and useable in a war
@Fermonos1 5 років тому
@@mrcaboosevg6089 No, Britain has a AC current war ready, there's two more being made projected to be ready '20.
@ozzybourne199 5 років тому
It appears at 2:56
@jafceeadnakjebxownrnsjsydo 5 років тому
a_slime that confused me too
@mrcaboosevg6089 5 років тому
@@Fermonos1 The aircraft carrier itself is but as far as i know there's barely any planes to put on it, currently being tested with F35's but even then there's only about half of the planned capacity of the carrier and the training for the pilots is still ongoing.
@ironmantis25 3 роки тому
This video did not mention that whenever an American aircraft carrier and its strike group shows up, the song "America fuck yeah" is suddenly heard playing in the background.
@burritoboy1012 3 роки тому
Rumour has it when they move into third world countries you can distinctly hear fortunate son playing in the distance
@Lord_Baphomet_ 2 роки тому
2:48 I love that there is Bobs Burgers playing on the TV in the mess hall! Gotta love the Navy 😂
@swoosh6947 3 роки тому
Other countries: has one or two carriers. U.S.A: *dominance intensifies*
@Lilbarii 3 роки тому
Champagne davy it’s literally 3 percent of our budget
@shelty3178 3 роки тому
KingBar -X out of five!
@Spartacus1314 3 роки тому
Should put more money into nasa
@MrHappyuk 3 роки тому
Us has over 3 trillion us dollar debts lol biggest debt in the world lol
@killerkitten7534 3 роки тому
Moocus14 we’re still the only country to land humans on the moon, and we have plans to go back by 2024 with progress going well. All that while have the biggest military in the world. No other country has landed humans on the moon yet, even though they had 50 years to do so. So yeah
@drak1559 5 років тому
Humanity: *Makes Aircraft Carriers* US: *ILL TAKE YOUR ENTIRE STOCK*
@shanes.9016 5 років тому
We are a force to be reckoned with.
@eighteen1741 5 років тому
Shane , America is the guy who you made fun of for being bad at a game , then they got better than you and are also loaded
@kalt7990 4 роки тому
@@eighteen1741 Modern age Rome.
@brainwashingdetergent4128 4 роки тому
@Jason Stark crack done toppled your mind 😂😂
@tygonmaster 4 роки тому
@Jason Stark Say that when the US is not the top economy in the world with businesses in every country in the world save for North Korea and military presence in nearly all countries as well.
@davedice4688 11 місяців тому
Thank you so much for showcasing the mighty COD! It is definite the best naval aircraft ever made. You got one thing wrong tho. We base on land, mostly, fly out to the boat, and then fly back to land for the night. That alleviates maintenance, berthing, space, etc needed for two more planes onboard. Plus, we operate better when we’re there on land to coordinate the cargo. And it’s 4 less meat-eaters to worry about onboard. Trust me on that one. Thanks again!
@ericjia6591 3 роки тому
Anybody that has played civilization knows how badass they are.
@uwanttono4012 3 роки тому
A super sonic DF26 missile (东风-26) would reduce these carriers to scrap in seconds! Currently the US has NO defense against these missiles!
@dullen2810 3 роки тому
@@uwanttono4012 That's. . . why we have guided missile carriers, and destroyers escorting carriers.
@dullen2810 3 роки тому
@@uwanttono4012 1) That's what they're designed to do. Predict where the missile is going to be, and then launch missiles there. The AA missile doesn't have to go into orbit, so no matter how fast the ballistic missile is, there will always be time to react. 2) Give me a reasonable scenario where China manages to successfully launch a nuclear attack on the United States and doest get at least detected and nuked into oblivion in return.
@uwanttono4012 3 роки тому
@@dullen2810 It's the hypersonic speed of the DF-26 that currently makes it impossible to intercept with present technology even though this technology is constantly improving. Why should I engage with you re your 2nd question? I have no interest in promoting one side over another. I am merely stating facts.
@blackopscw7913 3 роки тому
@@uwanttono4012 American Aircraft missiles travel at mach 4.0
@pelh2466 5 років тому
That guy at 7:50 was pulling some moves
@davari02gaming72 5 років тому
That is the top side PO, he is putting the plane in tension.
@gamernoob6337 5 років тому
Davari02 Gaming but he’s doing it *in style* (^.^)
@m.a4491 5 років тому
*Salt Bae has joined the chat*
@riderprovider909 5 років тому
Pelh24 f
@Ken19700 5 років тому
It's necessary to communicate what he's doing, it's too loud for words.
@thedoneeye 4 роки тому
"Each carrier actually has a mailing address just like any building in the US." That's *one* address that doesn't need to worry about porch pirates!
@amk_2490 4 роки тому
but they have other pirates to worry about LOL
@TheAwesomeAdventureA 4 роки тому
*laughs in Somali*
@ronalddavis 4 роки тому
other sailors will steal your stuff believe me
@ericreynolds74 4 роки тому
Aircraft Carriers now have the Ring Doorbell at each gangplank
@arthas640 4 роки тому
i dont know, China is pretty bold about stealing tech and secrets from the US military, I wouldnt be surprised if they sent spies to steal the Beats By Dre some sailor ordered.
@moms.gardenia 2 роки тому
Amazing, it’s truly hard to take all this in, and I’ve seen a lot of ships but none this big
@anarcipluvian 2 роки тому
The door question is, essentially, one of sentential logic. "If this door is safe, then the other door is deadly" is a normal conditional of for "If p, then q" where p is the sentence "This door is safe" and q "the other door is deadly". The informal semantics of sentential logic tells us that a conditional will be true so long as either the antecedent (p) is false OR the consequent (q) true. Therefore, the only way for a conditional to be false is for p to be true and q to also be false. Since we know the statement on the first door is false, we therefore also know that its antecedent is true and its consequent false. That is to say, "This door (door 1) is safe, and the other door (door 2) is *not* deadly". However, since a door being simply not deadly is not exactly the same as it being safe, since the former doesn't necessarily preclude any bodily harm just fatal harm, I think the unambiguously "correct" decision would be to take door #1, the door the sign is on.
@mr.winter538 2 роки тому
In context of the entire question it is presupposed that doors are either safe or deadly by necessity. Considering the reasoning you initially provided, door 2 cannot be deadly. Therefore, given there are no more than two options for the state of a door, door 2 is also safe. It is also to be noted that the states of both doors were questioned (as opposed to the most optimal choice for mitigating harm).
@supershluffy 2 роки тому
@@mr.winter538 Only if we agree to subscribe to the paradigm that allows for statements to be vacuously true. And also if we agree that the language is well-defined, of course. It is not a universal axiom that a false premise in a conditional statement always yields a vacuously true statement. I would not suppose that people who post deadly signs on doors also subscribe to the same paradigm, and therefore I would not enter either one.
@mr.winter538 2 роки тому
@@supershluffy Does the statement „There are two doors in front of you that are either safe or deadly” not imply the paradigm that allows for statements to be vacuously true? Considering the initially provided logic, we can all agree that the door cannot be deadly. This suggests the door can only either be safe or neither safe nor deadly. Since the door being neither safe nor deadly contradicts the dichotomous nature of the possibility of the states of each door that has been presupposed by the statement provided above, I would assume the door can only be safe. You are of course right in that we have to assume that all language is well-defined, however since we can neither test nor influence this from the perspective of the writers of the sign, I would argue this is a fair assumption to make. Lastly it is of course the best option to enter neither of the doors, since we have no reason to assume the writers of the sign were genuine, and can’t exclude the possibility of human error or false assumptions from either us or the writer.
@supershluffy 2 роки тому
@@mr.winter538 No, it does not imply that. For the simplest proof, we can just suppose that both doors lead to the same room of death. Therefore, even though the door on the left is deadly (i.e, even though the premise of the conditional is false), the entire sign statement is still false. Meaning that in this case, the sign does not have vacuous truth. Further, let us suppose that the doors are disjoint, neither state being dependent or connected upon the other. Also let us suppose that a door can be safe or deadly, but not both, and not neither. Then, let us suppose that the door on the right is in fact safe, while the door on the left is in fact deadly. And then someone puts up the sign. In this situation, some people might say the sign is false (edit: I'm one of them, maybe you are too), since even if the left room were made safe, the right room would be unaffected and would not become deadly. So we have the situation where the left room is deadly (the premise is false), but the sign statement is still false. In this case too, the sign does not have vacuous truth. Thus, we have the sign statement "if LS then DR" (SL = safe left, DR = deadly right) In the first case, we had LS false and DR true. But there was no vacuous truth. In the second case, we had LS false and DR false. Also with no vacuous truth.
@mr.winter538 2 роки тому
@@supershluffy To be perfectly honest I am slightly confused. Conditional statements can only be false if the premise is correct and the conclusion is false. Therefor I do not understand how such a statement could be false when the premise is false. In this example the sign makes no statement for when the left door is deadly. However since you appear to know this subject better than I do I doubt that you would make such a mistake. I either overlooked something crucial to your point or you forgot an important part of your argument. Could you please elaborate on this further?
@sqweebel1 4 роки тому
1:54 there's something so cool about the pattern made by the boats' wake
@WyldestZakk1980 4 роки тому
Looks like a Kite.
@Juggernaut1606 3 роки тому
they seem to be connected by some sort of cables
@bricefleckenstein9666 3 роки тому
@@Juggernaut1606 Only during UnReps.
@wyatt5786 4 роки тому
The largest airforce in the world in the US Airforce, the second largest is the US Navy LOL
@ohboydiamonds 4 роки тому
welcome to america
@breadskate4622 4 роки тому
America! Fuck yeah!
@mezatr 4 роки тому
If you really want to fly, join the Army or the Navy.
@darrenchriest300 4 роки тому
That would be United States Air Force, not airforce.
@wyatt5786 4 роки тому
@@darrenchriest300 -_-
@jacktastick 7 місяців тому
Unless you've seen one up close in person it's hard to comprehend how large these are.
@none.892 Рік тому
In school to work on the reactors on a carrier/nuclear sub now. School is tough, but the more you learn about this stuff the cooler it gets!
@spizzlo 4 роки тому
7:46 that was hilarious and made my day. that leg kick though...
@pikachu5647 3 роки тому
i was looking for this comment
@darkangel13915 2 роки тому
He’s got moves
@Twicken17 2 роки тому
You spotted an airbender.
@williamfarley3794 2 роки тому
I've been looking for this comment
@trishlittlejohn1509 4 роки тому
"you can order amazon on an aircraft carrier" *order amazon prime two day shipping
@d1v1nel2ight 4 роки тому
I had Amazon prime and I ordered stuffs while I was on deployment back in 2016. Took me about a month or two to get them lol
@shannonmurphy5726 4 роки тому
yeah becaus it had to get cheeked
@slashmotovlog973 4 роки тому
And door to door.
@MrLDAndrade 4 роки тому
d1v1nel2ight Were there porch pirates?
@warsameadam5572 4 роки тому
yes mess with USA the one or even more might loom at your shores.
@va960 3 роки тому
5:29 " ...like the one at London City Airport in London..." *Man, the man is killing us, man*
@va960 3 роки тому
And yes, THIS is how I react to a Department of Redundancy Department moment.
@gino14 2 роки тому
PRESS THE BOMB
@CHISK847 Рік тому
Thank you so much, this was so informative! Appreciate this channel
@blacksheep25251 4 роки тому
Aircraft carriers are also dispatched in times of emergency as the have the capability to airlift victims to their highly trained medical staff. Gerald R. Ford, first in the class, has an on-board hospital that includes a full lab, pharmacy, operating room, 3-bed intensive care unit, 2-bed emergency room, and 41-bed hospital ward, staffed by 11 medical officers and 30 hospital corpsmen.
@craigwoodward692 4 роки тому
I served on board the U.S.S. Ranger CV61 Ranger when I first walked up to this ship I was in complete awe by just the size of these ships. It is amazing how huge these these ships are.
@espedro65 4 роки тому
My uncle served also USS Ranger early 70's joseph ortega
@arthas640 4 роки тому
@@espedro65 my dad did briefly around the same time before getting changed to the Kitty Hawk
@oc4964 4 роки тому
my father, he's still a farmer
@jout738 2 роки тому
Its strange how 300 meter ship can hold crew of 6000 people.
@JohnSmith-iw9bs 2 роки тому
They shoudl paint Cool paint jobs on the front and sides of these ships like fighter planes Shark Teeth. For the missile cruisers they should paint a dick on the side and for the carrier they should paint a big black dick
@perigeedynamics5941 2 роки тому
1:50 the wakes of those ships draws Wendover's logo.
@jerrydiver1 3 роки тому
The defensive missiles of the strike group are the second tier of defense; the carrier's airwing is the first, defending the battle group out to hundreds of miles away by attacking the missile or torpedo launching platforms much farther away than defensive missiles can attack incoming missiles.
@_Matsimus_ 4 роки тому
Floating cities! Hell yes!
@SuperGreatSphinx 4 роки тому
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City
@thoseracingdrivers5078 3 роки тому
Did Dr.doofenshmirtz make these lol
@jaygreider4753 3 роки тому
I had been onboard the USS Forrestal (CVA-59) for 2 years. One day, walking through the hanger bay from stern to aft, there was another sailor walking aft to stern. I stopped and said, "David?" It was a guy that I grew up with. I asked how long he had been on the FID and he said "a year." I saw him once and never saw him again. Because of our ratings and where we worked and lived, we never got to see each other again. During the time I was onboard, there were murders, suicides, thefts, drug dealing, and all sorts of crime. Like any other city, it wasn't immune to crime. Onboard there is the MAA (Master's at Arms), the ship's police. Sometimes Marines, but mostly Navy -- all carrying a 45 on their hip.
@bnap3221 3 роки тому
I see you comment on all military videos
@starwarsfan_1206 3 роки тому
With guns. A floating city with guns
@kellensarien9039 4 роки тому
Left unanswered: why Thailand feels it needs an aircraft carrier.
@shadowslayer205 4 роки тому
Because all the cool kids have them.
@weasle2904 4 роки тому
Because China
@justicejordan1636 4 роки тому
Beacuse of the heated situation in the West Philippine Sea. China is building massive military bases on islands of the Philippines, which is by the way supposed to be illegal. However our president keeps telling us that it is a friendly matter which is most of us Filipinos think that it's not. Seriously though I would rather allow U.S. bases on our islands or waters than having those military based from China which imposes great threat in our freedom.
@harshitmishra7091 4 роки тому
True bruh 😂😂😂
@nelotharen8599 4 роки тому
because Thailand likes to show off
@michaelmappin4425 2 роки тому
Very good work. I saw nothing inaccurate. Hats off to TR V-1 Division. I see you guys represent on Elevator 3.
@gregorykennedy6869 2 роки тому
With the need for a stable platform, especially for landing, I wonder how much thought has gone into designing a very large catamaran design. The 2 hulls don't necessarilly need to be the same length, though they can be, depends on the final design. So much more redundancy in case of a hull strike, also have capacity to move surviving aircraft to other hull. I think it's worth a new design look. Austal (Australia) already make some of the largest of the US's multihull transport ships, surely scaling up is possible to the size needed.
@ethanmagdaleno5332 4 роки тому
Imagine needing a ramp to launch aircraft This post was made by flat deck gang
@eggman8053 4 роки тому
Ethan Magdaleno Imagine Only Launching Light Aircrafts This Post Was Made By The Catapult Gang
@RichardThornrose 4 роки тому
@@eggman8053 Imagine using the inferior catapult which can't even launch a 90 kg projectile 300 meters. This post was made by trebuchet gang.
@eggman8053 4 роки тому
Imagine Using A Airbase On Land This Post Was Made By The Aircraft Carrier Gang
@axef2946 4 роки тому
Gonna change my CoD clan tag (cringey, huh?) to FLDG (fl - flat d- deck g- gang) on like, some old one or something. Maybe original Black Ops (I prefer BO2 sadly)
@sleepy6324 4 роки тому
We in the biz call them poverty ramps
@PhilLin 5 років тому
I love how no one actually comments about what the creator wants you to comment on.
@user-jh4rr2es5w 5 років тому
probably most people click off at the start of the sponsor ad
@RalfSiegesmund 5 років тому
We don't know anything about the doors safe passage if the sign is wrong.
@puskajussi37 5 років тому
What if the deadlyness of the doors can be switched and the sign is there just for the occasion?
@Co1010z 5 років тому
@@cookiecookie1411 > If the first one is deadly, the sign cannot be considered "false" since you don't address what happens if it is deadly. This is terrible logic. It could still be false, even though it's not addressed. Unknown =! false. Therefore, the only thing we know is that it can't be 1.safe 2.deadly.
@michaelsachtjen2263 5 років тому
@@Co1010z Exactly. If the first door is safe, the second door is also safe. If the first door is deadly, nothing is known about the 2nd door. Also, we have no information about rather or not the first door is safe or deadly. However, the options on the quiz are: 1. Both doors are safe 2. The first door is safe; the second door is deadly 3. The first door is deadly, the second door is safe 4. Both doors are deadly I'm not so impressed with Brilliant.org if this is a legitimate sample question.
@njk3498 Рік тому
Having been on an aircraft carrier, I can say that this was very well done
@jyuyd8274 3 роки тому
"China, Thailand, India, Russia, and France each have one, Italy has two, and the US has eleven "
@sajidmon4600 3 роки тому
Hey that's not fair let's devide them equally
@SasNolan 3 роки тому
And funny thing, the India and China got theirs from our Russia, cuz we just sold em. Truly the greatest ditch in our gov. No money for maintainence ? Off you go. We're lucky to keep Kuznetsov around.
@sajidmon4600 3 роки тому
@@SasNolan you can sell other countries and still have one
@Liam_Daly 2 роки тому
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA FUCKING 'MERICA USA USA USA
@funnycrab5684 2 роки тому
@@Liam_Daly meinkraft
@gormauslander 5 років тому
When a boat has more residents than my town...
@GracieTurts 5 років тому
That's a SMALL town
@gormauslander 5 років тому
Indeed.
@GracieTurts 5 років тому
Where are your towns? How far is the nearest city?! 280,000 here in CA.
@gormauslander 5 років тому
The nearest "city" is an hour drive away and still only has 9,985
@flighted2513 5 років тому
280,000 is alot of people? LOL. Coming from NYC
@okinawatim3421 4 роки тому
World: How many Aircraft carriers do you have? USA: *YES*
@AurumFaber 3 роки тому
@@n.m.8802 57 in '72 if I remember correctly.
@bricefleckenstein9666 3 роки тому
@@AurumFaber Don't think it was quite that high, as all of the WWII era "jeep carriers" were long since retired and there never were all THAT many LHA-class ships.
@AurumFaber 3 роки тому
@@bricefleckenstein9666 I just reviewed my encyclopedia. I did not have it at the time that I posted my reply. It compares major navies at the time. It says; *US* : 742,000 personal, *56 carriers* , 37 cruisers, 694 destroyers, 260 landing craft, 207 submarines, 137 conventional, 70 nuclear. Russia; 500,000 personal, 0 carriers, 20 cruisers, 210 destroyers, 230 landing craft, 380 submarines, 340 conventional, 40 nuclear. *(Including warships not on active duty)* It doesn't give any more information on these specific navies than I have given. The encyclopedia list it's source as: Jane's Fighting Ships, 1966-1967 This is page 67 of the *N* book.
@bricefleckenstein9666 3 роки тому
@@AurumFaber 56 carriers in the mid-1960s sounds about right - pretty much all of the Essex/Ticonderoga class that lived through WW II, many of the Forestall class (not sure if they all were in service yet, there were 2 built AFTER Enterprise), I think Big E was in service by then, and some of the "jeep" carriers were retained for a while.
@asfadf3038 3 роки тому
4:09 Nongsim Sin ramen 농심 신라면. -Proud Nongshim employee's brother in law
@KhezuWiggles 3 роки тому
‘If this door is safe, the other door is deadly.’ Assuming that this is false, that means that if door 1 is safe, so is door 2. However if door 1 is deadly, door 2 is unaffected, and can be either safe or deadly. This means that there are 3 outcomes, both doors are safe, door 1 is deadly and door 2 is safe, or door 1 and door 2 are deadly. Door 1 has a 1/3 chance of being safe while door 2 has a 2/3 chance, meaning that door 2 has a higher chance of being safe than door 1.
@HuyV 2 роки тому
While I agree on the possibilities, the probabilities are not necessarily true. We have no information about probabilities. So you are ASSUMING uniform distribution of the 4 base combinations of doors.
@ae5646 5 років тому
As someone who has been on 2 Nimitz class carriers and the Gerald R. Ford, you did a very great job in this video. It was very accurate and well researched, probably the most informative video on UKposts.
@xjones2087 5 років тому
i've tracked carriers, they go much faster than 35. The ship i was on couldn't cruise with carriers because we weren't fast enough, lol, not even close.
@spencercarruth9706 5 років тому
How was it on the Ford? I’ve always wanted to see that beauty in person!
@PrograError 5 років тому
@@xjones2087 uhm... classified info much? then again it's peacetime, so most of the ships doesn't get put through it's paces... aka a hidden sword up their ass crack and ready to rip.
@ae5646 5 років тому
@@xjones2087 "35" was just the disclosed speed...which that in itself is crazy!
@ae5646 5 років тому
@@spencercarruth9706 Amazing! Not quite as cool as the DDG1000 series or the LCS class, but it just needs to get the kinks out! Haha.
@jundellas9202 4 роки тому
Italy have two carriers. Didn't expect that
@thomasb.5643 4 роки тому
They're made of spaghetti
@andrewputnam2717 4 роки тому
Well almost the entire country is coast so it makes sense
@mmckenzie9367 4 роки тому
That’s in case the captain beaches one while trying to impress a girl.
@fluffigverbimmelt 4 роки тому
@@mmckenzie9367 Great reference, well played
@str2010 4 роки тому
Mind you, they're just enormous floating lasagnas with giant pizza slices as aircraft
@jazminalarcon8668 5 місяців тому
My uncle served on the USS Kitty Hawk, I've always had such a fascination with air craft carriers.
@metallicmonarch2025 3 роки тому
I remember going on and getting a tour of the USS Turman at Norfolk Virginia, that was a really interesting time and the ship was giant, and being able to go up onto the flight deck was amazing as well like it really is just an airport on water.
@michaelmappin4425 2 роки тому
Norfolk, Virginia.
@metallicmonarch2025 2 роки тому
@@michaelmappin4425 right I keep forgetting that
@Coypop 5 років тому
THEY'RE AIRPORTS IF YOU SQUINT.
@Jake-rm4be 5 років тому
Coypop no there Patrick
@pauljs75 5 років тому
Technically yes. And it has an airforce that's bigger than that of most countries.
@ambalon 5 років тому
@@pauljs75 Most countries? Isn't the US Navy the world's second largest airforce? lol
@pauljs75 5 років тому
@@ambalon Just one carrier all by itself. Not including the rest of those in the fleet and aircraft on bases.
@ThomasNing 5 років тому
no, they are airports.
@zakaryloreto6526 5 років тому
In the USA we have so many aircraft carriers we made one into a museum in San Diego
@iPepy 5 років тому
And one here in New York City, the USS Intrepid
@qwertygirl334675 5 років тому
Yeah, I actually see it from the Roosevelt every day. Love being stationed down in San Diego, gorgeous area.
@tspencer227 5 років тому
...and one in Charleston (Yorktown), and one in Texas (Lexington).
@spatsky 5 років тому
tspencer227 Hornet (Alameda County in the San Francisco Bay Area)
@SuperSMT 5 років тому
I just went to the Intrepid in NYC last week, great museum!
@harikrishna6842 Рік тому
Great work. Thankyou for the knowledge.
@jemimychannel7893 3 роки тому
Wow. .i impressed with thailand which have this vessel.. good job guys.. From your neighbour Malaysia
@Gazzar 4 роки тому
One of the main logistical challenges of operating the Queen Elizabeth carriers is of course maintaining the beer stocks in the onboard pub. If the beer runs out...back to port (get it?).
@brad144k Рік тому
Onboard pub? You got to be shitting me? We got a beer day once like every 4 months at sea or something and could have 2 beers each. Some guys sold theirs lol
@user-wg1nr1lg2p 5 років тому
*My answer to the question is:* There are four possible combinations of deadly/save doors: 1=safe & 2=safe (sign is false) 1=safe & 2=deadly (sign is true) 1=deadly & 2=safe (sign is unknow/indeterminate, in other words: neither true nor false) 1=deadly & 2=deadly (sign is unknow/indeterminate/neither true nor false) The sign is false, only when *both doors are safe.* However, the question can be interpreted in multiple ways (like Swiffah and others explain below). (note 11:20, the original question on Brilliant explicitly states "There are two doors before you that are _either_ safe _or_ deadly")
@fj12n3 5 років тому
comp sci?
@Swiffah145 5 років тому
Brilliant should specify what kind of conditional they mean. If it's a material conditional, then @Æ is right: A->B is false iff A true and B false. If it's something else (e.g. a counterfactual or indicative conditional) then the answer would be different.
@rayblade6383 5 років тому
That's brilliant.
@Chrisc0Disc0 5 років тому
Thank you for this, I was stuck!
@dalegaliniak607 5 років тому
@@Swiffah145 Yeah, this was my line of thinking. You have two indeterminate states, the sign can be false, but since it describes a safe door, if door 1 is deadly, it's impossible to determine the state of door 2.
@rocprcr 2 роки тому
Just to let you know, a ship, including an aircraft career, has four departments: the deck department, the engine department, the telecommunications department and the steward’s department. In the case of a carrier, these colored shirted people are deck officers and deck ratings. Below deck are Engineering officers and engineering ratings. Radio is easily the telecommunications department and food is served by the stewards department under the leadership of the Chief Steward and the Chief Cook.
@ZachCremisiSky 2 роки тому
1 department never to mess with is engineering. They can make sure you have cold water for your showers
@logicplague2077 2 роки тому
"Red shirts do all the handling and mounting of ammunition." Why am I not surprised?
@uss_04 4 роки тому
02:48 “What they can’t do is carry enough food” > Bob’s Burgers in background
@jasonlatham3238 3 роки тому
We had pilots get us McDonalds while in the Persian Gulf.
@blackopscw7913 3 роки тому
@@jasonlatham3238 Awesome 😎
@godlessveteran2431 5 років тому
From someone that served on the USS George Washington CVN-73, good job with this video! Very well done. One nit pick, that top speed is what is declassified. They're faster than that ;)
@ko-Daegu 5 років тому
Kerry Collier What did you guys do back then when you where working Any funny things you can share
@lisarocker24 5 років тому
Kerry Collier omg that’s worse than being forced to mop the flight deck 😂where do you guys come up with this stuff Like making us ask the CO for the keys to the jet 😭
@godlessveteran2431 5 років тому
@@KevinJCoburn I was there from 97 to 2000. I started in V-2 in Air Department but became an AG and ended up in OA.
@lk29392 5 років тому
Ahead flank 151. Set the high speed lineup....
@Fifthelement203 5 років тому
yea cus 35mph made no sense with the distances he says it can travel over the days. def faster
@Bergen98 3 роки тому
I like that US Armed Forces has a separate Air Force, but then each branch has ITS OWN AIR FORCE, and all of them (especially the Navy) can be as powerful as AF itself
@applesyrupgaming 3 роки тому
does your country not have one
@a-drewg1716 2 роки тому
@@applesyrupgaming Most countries generally only have an army, a navy, and then an air-force. Then generally only the air-force has fixed-wing aircraft with the other branches only really having helicopters or some light prop planes. The US is special in the fact that it has both the largest airforce (the USAAF) and the second largest airforce (USN)
@danielcachafeiro2590 10 місяців тому
Im loving this channel. Is there a book recommendation that simulates this kind of narratives?
@willmacca8001 4 роки тому
7:46 made me laugh so hard and I don’t even know why
@iamkaus 4 роки тому
Super Saiyan!
@johnsamson4465 4 роки тому
He is the last airbender.
@cadenschmidt6877 4 роки тому
Will Macca me when i’m home alone dancing in my room
@illpunchyouintheface9094 4 роки тому
That’s the damn Green Power Ranger
@nopiez4u876 3 роки тому
7:47
@manuelpinto3051 3 роки тому
There was also a portuguese submarine (barracuda) in 1983 during an exercise called "locked gate 83" wich was able to get under an american aircraft carrier (Eisenhower) that was passing by. The american ship was going to the mediterranean to replace another american aircraft carrier and so being alies, the portuguese commander thougt it was a good idea to stop the exercise and follow the strike group without telling them in order to prevent any soviet attacks. It turned out he was able to get under the ship without getting identified. The portuguese convetional sub was unable to keep the speed of the strike group tho and so when dettaching from the group it came to the surface and transmitted that they had launched all their torpedoes. The american bridge was concerned but they understood it was a joke. They ended up praising the portuguese comander and asking for it's recordings in order to study why had they been unable to detect it.
@peacebestillconversations3761 2 роки тому
we have launched photon torpedoes, would be more hilarious
@BrucetheChino_ 3 роки тому
This video went straight to the point didnt wait until the end to bring it up
@EnglishLearnersHere 6 місяців тому
Wow! Impressive video since it's packed with a lot of interesting information! 💕💖💖
@Part_121_Wannabe 4 роки тому
"How many carriers do you want to have?" US Navy: "Yes"
@burninroses1755 4 роки тому
hmmm, i dont want that many of em, eh make it 20
@olivermeyer2933 4 роки тому
This moment u realize since ww2 the americans build nearly 100 aircraft carriers soo yeah
@Damfinsaowefinawe 4 роки тому
I’ll take your entire stock
@JJAB91 4 роки тому
Still a far cry from World War 2 when nations had dozens of aircraft carriers each
@eddiemcdonald4720 4 роки тому
Completely unnecessary
@raymondlaniel5407 5 років тому
I also like the way they can provide emergency water, power, medical aid, search and rescue, etc., to areas devastated by natural disasters.
@StoneCoolds 5 років тому
Or devastate un natural areas lol
@user-kx4xs2xd3k 2 роки тому
@@StoneCoolds that if nuclear reactor blow up
@ExplorationAtlas 2 роки тому
Great video. An interesting history note, is that aircraft carriers were first used in combat during the early stages of World War 2. The Japanese attach on Pearl Harbor by carrier-based planes on December 7th, 1941, dramatically demonstrated the potential of the aircraft carrier, which thereafter was the dominant combat vessel of the war.
@S0RGEx 2 роки тому
Actually, their potential was demonstrated in combat before Pearl Harbor, with the Battle of Taranto in 1940 (which the Japanese Navy likely studied when planning the Pearl Harbor attack) and arguably the Sino-Japanese War in the years leading up to WWII. And prior to the outbreak of war, there were exercises ran by many navies which demonstrated the potential power of carrier aviation.
@johnfitbyfaithnet 2 роки тому
Very interesting thank you for sharing this important information
@thelegend8570 3 роки тому
"Red shirts do all the handling and mounting of ammunition." *_HMMM_*
@Lorath333 3 роки тому
They also increase the ammo storage capacity of the ship. Each red shirt can fit up to 300 rounds in their chests.
@toms75 3 роки тому
@@Lorath333 Like, they eat the rounds?
@dane1317 3 роки тому
Tom S Someone didn’t get the joke.
@stereodegree2257 3 роки тому
Huh
@muhonbhuiyan8687 3 роки тому
Don’t get confused by the color codes. Those vehicles contains lots of Souls, Human Being, Our or Your Family and that is important than anything. So, how do you expect that, makers of any kind of vehicle like that will tell you the truth?
@Pikwii 5 років тому
7:48 that guy has some moves.
@JTMarlin8 4 роки тому
bboy for sure
@harshitmishra7091 4 роки тому
Lmao bruh😂
@lordemp7172 4 роки тому
I THOUGHT SO 2 DOG!! LMFAO
@ATHVhandles 3 роки тому
Thanks for sponsoring brilliant. That's an amazing, truly addictive way to learn things better.
@justinwang1523 3 роки тому
0:56 The Brits now have two carriers, the HMS Queen Elizabeth and the HMS Prince of Wales
@buffalome1543 3 роки тому
The video was made in 2018.
@cazulon1122 3 роки тому
Dumbass
@gregspecht481 5 років тому
Carriers are pretty much modern starships. Giant vessels with smaller craft to defend it. Takes thousands of people to operate. Crosses relatively enormous distances extremely far from civilisation. It plays that exact same role
@MTGFoil 5 років тому
Greg Specht run by convicts
@NCRF510 5 років тому
Star Trek : water wars
@gregspecht481 5 років тому
@@NCRF510 With torpedoes AND railguns
@duckqueak 5 років тому
what do you think starships are based off of?
@remembernavarro5344 5 років тому
Don't you think that, maybe, fictional spaceships are based on real world navy ships?
@_wheat856 4 роки тому
That strike group... it feels familiar ITS THE BATTLESHIP GAME LAYOUT
@sohinimukherjee2856 4 роки тому
That profile pic is CREEPY
@firewolf1814 4 роки тому
But battleship has battleships
@aarondas 2 роки тому
2:09 I always knew Captain America still serves for his country
@kevinoconnor6577 3 роки тому
"We are equipped to deal with the US millitary" Japan: "No no no, we have seen this, we attacked a few boats, they dropped the sun on us TWICE
@Monke4_4593 3 роки тому
The true facts
@pexton317 3 роки тому
wow copying the russian badger i see
@ekulerudamuru 3 роки тому
@@pexton317 what vid?
@JDP2104 2 роки тому
The US rules the waves like its father before her
@RennTalIssue 4 роки тому
The guy on 7:46 is satisfying for me. Idk why but that moves tho (I know thats their job but i simply love it)
@chrismaggio7879 3 роки тому
haha fyi they sped that up a bit. We do that a bit slower and more controlled than it showed... was funny though!
@michaelmappin4425 2 роки тому
The V-2 topside petty officer gives visual reference to the yellow shirt director to hook up the aircraft to the catapult for launch.
@catdaddy294 5 років тому
I'm a welder for these things... let me tell you what, the tight spaces? Living nightmare. I have nothing but respect for the men and women who serve on those behemoths.
@DaftPunkSkittle 5 років тому
well they can't leave even if they wanted to, its a big decision
@aleciacarpenter7856 5 років тому
@@DaftPunkSkittle Sounds like the Hotel California!
@youreright4723 5 років тому
Lol are you from Newport News shipyard ?
@issacmcgann9918 5 років тому
im in trade school for welding does this job pay well? if you don't mind me asking
@catdaddy294 5 років тому
@@youreright4723 I'm at Newport News Shipbuilding. I'm a pipewelder on 2nd shift.
@darjanpanovski8515 3 роки тому
love the video keep going on
@justice3865 2 роки тому
+1,000,000 for so much focus on the C-2a. Often overlooked, but still pretty cool 😎.
Фейгин. Смерть Соловьева, арест Шойгу, где будет наступать Россия, штурм Харькова, США нагнули Китай
В гостях у Гордона
Переглядів 996 тис.
Апостроф TV
Переглядів 842 тис.
NAVY Productions
Переглядів 4,3 млн
Фейгин. Смерть Соловьева, арест Шойгу, где будет наступать Россия, штурм Харькова, США нагнули Китай
В гостях у Гордона
Переглядів 996 тис.