Like ukraine austraila has byallowing a build up of usa forces and jiont training xercise has volunteered to be a punching bag for china . In a sense . Like wise tiwain will be used to keepthe chinese navy penned in to the first island chain. After the great sucess in Afghanitan i am certain the usa will Prevail under wise leadership of thier young vigerous comander in chief biden

BTW, in Afghanistan, a bunch of Canadian Engineers from one unit came up with an IED/mine detecting robot for a fraction of what the US machine costs.

@@LoneBrowncoat That's impressive, but that's not particularly hard when all US defence contractors use cost-plus contracts to spend the absolute maximum while delivering mediacracy.

@@HexaSquirrel ...There's a missing post of mine...shadow deleted-- we really need some alternative to UKposts. FREE SPEECH!!!!!! Didn't think I was going to need Notepad to protect my words as there was nothing politically incorrect in it.

@@LoneBrowncoat Quite a number of people are copying all their videos to Odysee .... so if UKposts deletes their Channel, it can live on. Also on Odysee, comments don't get shadow-deleted and you don't get shadow-banned.

Harper cancelled everything ....

@@jasondrummond9451what did Harper cancel?

How do you suppose Canada pay for military upgrades? Print more money?

@@RepublicOfWesternCanadaNOW That’s the last thing I want but we can cancel unnecessary programs that the liberals placed? We could idk try being more independent. We have options but we also have an over priced government for what we get. No progress was really made in the last 20 years in general.

@@jordanhulley2184 CONservatives are the ones who spent 80M$ (or what it 800M$?) on the blue-prints alone for these useless ships. You want to talk wasteful spending, talk to conservatives who lined their pockets with it.

@@MelioraCogito You pointed out one minor thing that’s actually justified but you seem to be talking about a topic you know nothing about. Buying ships and producing them are two very different things. The liberals are no better than the Chinese or Russians by forcing their unpopular opinions and ideology. You come across as someone who would vote liberal or NDP who have both caused massive inflation lol if you work for a living this would be an issue.

@@jordanhulley2184 .....BTW......Look up C.D. Howe, the major booster for AVRO and led Canada's WW2 "Industrial Revolution" and old school Liberal party member.

@@pa610 And there are seaborne (aquatic) drones as well as aerial. Good for bridges and ships.

Multiple gun turrets mostly committed to anti air. Radar guided & remotely controlled from below armoured deck.

said 100mm is outdated - fires less explosives per minute than said 76.2mm and 57mm cannons, the 100mm's also highly inaccurate as with other soviet naval cannons

@@blisteringstars Payload isn't everything: maximum range M38 25mm Bushmaster 2000 yards, Russian 100mm gun, maximum range 20 km.

The canadians new vessels can also be modified and armed with more powerful weapons if needed these ain't really ment to be heavily armed tho that'd what are frigates are for

The ice isn't melting. Hundreds of stranded global warming vessels prove that!

Canada has declined to allow british dubmarines passage thru these waters as to not set a precedent. and fear of them or other nations begining a Pattern that could be seen as a declaration of this as a internationally navitable water way subject to unternational law and therfore not canadaian waterways

CO2 = Plant Food.

@@supmdude1527 Imagine trying to refute a claim and not sending a link to said info.

@@supmdude1527 which mainstream, state-funded propaganda outlet printed that headline?

@@dontforget2289 _"Imagine trying to refute a claim and not sending a link to said info."_ ... Says the OP who didn't provide any sources to his/her claim. 🤦 _“The first indication of stupidity is a complete lack of shame.”_ -Sigmund Freud

Canada has 318 billion trees, 8953 per person. We emit 675,918,610 tons of CO2/year. It takes 100 trees to remove 1 ton of CO2 from the atmosphere per year. Therefore it takes 68 Billion trees to capture our CO2. Canada doesn't need more trees we need a PM that can do math.

Russia can open its waters to China, which will hold a gun to Canada and US head this way, it is better to be prepared. Building bases and ships will take time.

True but still Canada should have the ability to defend its boarders..... and I can't believe we have the ability to develop a nuclear weapons and we don't. Canada should not depend on the US for defence.. let's call Canada the 51st state..

It won't be Russian military incursions initially it will be Russian commercial incursions, exploration, challenge of our arctic sovereignty with a few off shore exploration rigs and then on shore. The Canadian military would respond (as best it could) and maybe convene a few meetings. In response to naked aggression against Russian commercial interests by the Canadian military, the Russian military would respond and send Canada packing without an interaction. The US is in no position to respond in the Arctic.

@@ianspeedy Canada does have the technological, scientific and industrial capabilities for develop our own nukes. But that is only happening at the last resort

@@tedyuan2066 I know that but by then it will be too late, i am assuming you understand how long it take to train and have a ready units to defend this country. And all around us have the ability to do so. And we can't count on the US for everything just from one change in presidency the theme was USA first.

Lol you are probably one of those cut the budget conservatives. You want it both ways

@@rcpmac Your bland Assumption is disappointing and laughable. How you turned my comment into something like that just suck's, I fully support the environment and our military. And this current government isn't doing anything about it.

yeah year round is like that not big deal.

Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.

The biggest point working against the climate activists is that they say climate change is such a big problem immediate action is necessary --- unless that country is China, despite China being, by far, the single biggest contributor to the problem. I'll take the climate activists seriously when they finally start demanding actions be taken against China.

Yes and if the climate was following its normal pattern it would be cooling not waeming. Where did you get your degree in physics.

@@jonmce1 there is not way of stopping the end of the earth or time does not matter how many degree in physics, everything that has a beginning will end.

Ya ok lol, you’d be surprised how many people would jump a call to action if Canada was invaded.

As you might know both Denmark and Canada are co-founding NATO members. It seems many in Canada believes the recent agreement making Canada and Greenland land sharing neighbours at Hans Island had that as focus point but that are not the case at all. The entire border agreement covers a vast area from the tip of Greenland and basically nearly all the way to the pole. This agreement makes border enforcement easier for both The Kingdom of Denmark and Canada as well as NATO/NORAD. Any weird thoughts that might have brewed in Russia or even China should now be buried for good.

NOBODY in the free world will allow our borders to be violated. Our allies have as much to lose as we do. and we are NATO.

Burn wood and garbage. Drive old polluting vehicles

Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.

Yes but when the climate has changed in the past it has had consequences for organisms relying upon it. Anoxic bacteria went extinct 2 billion years ago when oxygen abundances from photosynthetic processes by blue green algae became prominent in the atmosphere. About 95 % of life went extinct 250 million years ago when the Siberian Satraps increased carbon abundances in the atmosphere . Curtis you rely on a stable environment where you live to allow you to afford whatever life style you have. If that changes doesn't matter what you can afford because nature doesn't care what you can or cannot afford. A tornado doesn't pick or choose. Flooding rivers or fierce forest fires don't stop at your house and move past. You have relied on a status quo kind of climate for a long time (been around for about 10,000 years) but if it no longer is the status quo you either get with the picture or drown in the flood. Nature doesn't mince words.

@@professorakiba434 what makes you think humans can stop climate change with the carbon tax? We can't even get enough homes,doctors, nurses etc etc In fact the carbon output has only gone up and people can't heat their homes or buy enough food etc etc.

@@-LightningRod- the only foolish people I've seen are the ones claiming the carbon will reduce carbon emissions and claim men can become women and women men.

. . . Du villst ownt nottink undt be happisch!

to make up the news according to his will.

North Warning System was last upgraded in 1985, according to the video.

@@annoyed707 the warning system..yeh..

i agreed lets start by getting nuclear weapons in canada we have none.

@@ididnotdoit1188 all our allies have enough nukes to protect us and would probably start looking at us sideways if we randomly started building them. Waste of money.

@@grandcentral3007 Always best to have our own in case all the allies nukes failed or says Not their business to protect Canada.

@@ididnotdoit1188 what I'm saying is that nuclear weapons are not something we would do unilaterally.

@@grandcentral3007 well how about nuclear powered submarines and icebreakers. We can do that

It is a patrol vessel. Not a combat vessel.

@@kevin-yv1ig True but we have very few combat vessels capable of northern defence. Bottom line we're a large unpopulated country that can't afford the cost of defence and annual maintenance of the country. We need more people overall and way more people in the territories. We need to get serious and more strategic about immigration to populate the north and increase our force. Family reunification is nice but northern service and entrepreneurship is more useful.

@@IMGreg.. Which is why Canada is aquring type 26 frigates. while optimised differently at full load these will be about 9400 tons twice the sivze of our current frigates, about the same sive as the Russian flagship cruiser sunk in the Black Sea or a American Burke class destroyer. But first we need the ice breaking capacity which is why we are building two heavy ice breakers. The ice is still too thick for almost all nabal ships right now.

If we got the backing from NATO like Ukraine did, we could kick Russia's incompetent Navy and Military

Blind leading the blind, nato will help,lol. Maybe we need to start with learning the truth first instead of government propaganda. Independent journalists are a good start. You have been lied to about Ukraine, please research this for yourself. Patrick Lancaster or Eva Bartlett.

Computer control systems

Lol, your logic is laughable.

Russia never went all out lol.. we wouldn’t stand a second

@@dom40864 the delusion is laughable. Russia never was an economic power, they always claimed to have those super weapon/vehicle when they only had the budget to build 10 that would get destroyed within a week, their training even pre war was laughable compared to western standards

Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.

Pretty sure it can't be accessed remotely

i think the germans are building huge modern wing in body flying cargo zeplins those would prob work good in the cold dense air in the artic?

How do you defend against hypersonic missiles?

Well if you are denying that Russia has aims in the north and that we are not friends but bitter enemies and that our northern border is very frail and easily overcome by Russia at this point what you are saying suggests to me that you must be living with your head in the sand. Which caterpillar or flying pig did you consult when you tweeted this. Seems like you live totally in Looking Glass Land. Wonder if inflation even reaches there?

In the late 80's we were looking at buying Trafalgar class subs. Our politicians scuttled it over costs, along with some nudging by the U.S.

It's not just the nuclear sub, there has to be a support infrastructure for the sub which is very expensive and probably not worth it for the number of subs Canada will likely get. Australia may be leasing their nuclear subs from the US, we should do the same.

The reason we need the nuclear submarines is they can be under the ice for long periods of time. In the case of the new British submarines the whole Canadian Arctic could be watched with two submarines. You just cannot do that with any other pieces of equipment...

@@davidgough4750 You need more than 2 subs. Subs require a lot of maintenance time in dock.

Yes we will need a minimum of 6 submarines as one set on patrol, one set in maintenance, and one set training to deploy next...

They can open their Arctic waters to China, did you think about this? You want to see Chinese submarines in the Canadian North?

All of Putin's bootlickers.

They will never interview them, they go against the narrative because they speak the truth

why dont you try googling that you might be surprised

but but ,,,the man on tv told me that if i paid him lots of money he would change the weather???

Bell end.

​@@jimbojones101nah he's right

Can't agree anymore, man. Love this.😃

Our artic sovernty must never be questioned

Canadas navy is weak though

Why would Russia care about Ukraine?

ummm untapped natural resources maybe? strategic positioning?

@@badeggproductions9484 plus they have been talking about getting a foothold on north america. They hate the fact they sold alaska to usa

Resources. Territory. What do you think?. Do you live in a bubble or is that your head stuck in the sand.

@@mobo8933 even if they didnt they would probably lose it during the civil war cause we, the americans or british would've taken it or the white army would make a holdout there.

in the 50's the usa made nuke powered bomber that they test flew twice before grounding.then the "military intelligence" decided to make a nuke powered missle. kicker is they had no idea how to use it, basically in the end they decided it was best used by flying it appx 300ft above the ground over hostile territory setting every thing on fire in its path and spreading toxic radiation every where and then just criss crossing the area at supersonic speeds untill it ran out of fuel. fortunetly wiser heads prevailed and these silly prodjects were cancelled, putin has copied this idea tho. the usa still have appx 56 shouldler launchable mini nukes of 40 k ton yield these were to be carried on a 3 man jeep crews . fortuntly a smart general decided its best not to give these weapons to inexperience soildiers with 6 -8 weeks of basic trainning due to the risks grunts accidentally triggering a nuclear world war 3. Since then war criminal Obhama was suppose to dissassemble these as part of disarment treaties .Instead he spent the 50 million on new drone bases so he could bomb gas stations and wedding partys in the hopes of killing off terrorist ,insurgents, and the usual bad guys?

waves hand ..these are not the russian bots you are seeking luke,,, use the force

@@punkinhootYou're exactly right. I worked in Kyrgyzstan. You could go camping on a nuclear waste dump, if you weren't careful.

Exactly. Russophobia must end by the destruction of Russia's military in the Ukraine. And the removal of Putin.

How do you get to hell? Very simple: claim that you're innocent. How do you get to heaven? Very simple: Admit that you're not Innocent, you're guilty and ask for mercy. How to know if you're guilty or not? Simply: Compare your life to the Ten Commandments God gave you in the Bible. Everyone agrees that if people followed the ten commandments there would be no need for governments or police. Do not lie. Do not steal. Do not commit adultery. Do not insult God by using his name as a cuss word. There are six more but let's just leave it at that. How many lies have you told in your life? Have you ever taken anything that didn't belong to you? Jesus said, if you look at a women lustfully you've already committed adultery in your heart with that woman. How many times a day do you do that? Do you use God's name as a cuss word? Would you do that with your own mother's name? If you answer these questions honestly you know that you're guilty. God can justly punish you and send you to hell. Ask him for mercy. His name is Jesus. It's as simple as this, The Ten Commandments are called the moral law. You and I broke God's laws. Jesus paid the fine. The fine is death. Ezekiel 18:20 - "The soul who sins shall die. That's why Jesus had to die on the cross for our sins. This is why God is able to give us Mercy. Option A. You die for your own sins. Option B. Ask for mercy and accept that Jesus died on the cross for you.

Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.

And God looked and said "I create a climate that can be impacted by geology, astronomic events, and by biological activity. While earth remains, chemical changes and abundances caused by the aforementioned activity can impact and shift climate from extreme warm to extreme cold and that life upon it shall either cease to exist or adapt to survive for climate change is a product of my creation."

@@professorakiba434 God's weather prediction has held true for 4,400 years. It was given to Noah and his family shortly after they exited the ark following the global flood. God is never wrong.

@@-LightningRod- UKposts simply does not allow these comments anymore. No one can see it except for you and I. I do not support this policy, I support free speech.

They all have to use their weapons somewhere, they're making billions on weapons...what are these weapons doing to help climate by the way?

Ils existes déjas, Defense Early Warning Line...DEW Line.

@@JGL841 c'est juste des radars, je parle de points de controle ou des navires veraient necessairement tout vaisseaux traversant nos eaux.