the virgin ancient european powers, *AND THE CHAD LEOPOLD II*

Chad was not ruled by Leopold ||

@@paudelfamily4812 a different kind of chad is what i meant. :P

&$+$_ did biggest massacre as a ruthless dictator

@@aztekenen1 xd

Don't get it

@@trollinape2697 Usually UK is represented in red and Spain in yellow.

@@sljemic k thx

@Anthony Perez Flag, centre of UK's flag is red while the Spanish is yellow

@@sljemic especially in Paradox games.

@The Crusader You've just described cultural suppression. Bro. The European colonist only ever wanted what was best for them, they didn't give a single shit about the African population, which is why they were sold as slaves, transported across the Atlantic where they literally died, and those who managed to stay in Africa didn't have a much better fate. They died. Lots of them died, horribly, and brutally. Quit your bullshit, We should be amazed most Africans and Arabs aren't calling for our immediate death.

@@RealOsquo Arabs and Africans used and traded slaves thousands of years ago while Europeans were mostly hunter-gatherer tribes. You should quit YOUR bullshit. It was karma.

@@RealOsquo arabs have been selling the slaves since the times of rome, so what are you talking about? They have been buying slavs as slaves, that's actually how the term was created since slavs were the slaves, also Arabic slave trade? And you are mixing atlantic slave trade and colonization:) about some century difference at least

@@LGMechanic Two wrongs don't make a right. How about no one fucking sells anyone?

@@RealOsquo prisoners of war were kept as slaves in africa before the atlantic slave trade.

"explored" feels like quite a euphemism here...

@@jamaike1185 LMAO

Poland never colonized anything :P We weren't under a protectorate, and we didn't get "colonized" (conquered) throughout our history except the Teutonics which we won against anyways and when Prussia (not Germany -_-), Austria (-Hungary) and Russia decided to get our terrain together. We couldn't win, so we remained conquered 123 years but the generations survived and kept the polish culture and it's the same Poles now who live today and lived back then. If you in the first comment mean that Poland colonized Lithuania then sry to tell you that's bullshit... Poland gained a personal union over Lithuania (our monarch gained their throne cuz they had no heir kinda). Something similiar was happening by the Habsburgs

And cuz our big country was a problem to Russia cuz we blocked their border they decided to corrupt our country with a puppet-king and he simply allowed Russia many things that a normal king wouldn't do like: give them our land in gifts step by step. He was so ridiculous that HE spent so much money on fun for him that he somehow managed to use all the country's money, then debted Poland for the same reason by other countries. Ever heard of a king who debted his country for his fun wishes? Ofc he also didn't do other shit than have fun in his palace, most hated Polish king.

Tinnakorn Wantae 3 Not Polish- Lithuanian but Courland have colony in Gambia river island

It was surprise that Polish-Lithuania had colony

@@hym7844 I agree with you, Lublin Union 1569 made us united nations, we were strong, but at 17 century we failed war with Russians, got occupated by Sveden and then splited up at 1795, thats history folks, dont create you own, such like in Russia: that Lithuanians are ancient Russians, uhhh, discusting.

He killed 15m people but his name isn't Hitler you won't hear about it

@@rider6500 And what is that supposed to mean?

We heard about in school, just everybody said Belgium

@@biliminsrlar5752 Don't forget about the Irish famine and Bengal famine.

@Bolaji Windapo it only matters when white people do it to white people.

And you, do you know the level of Colonialism/Imperialism in the United States? The following text may help you: "Please check out these FACTS that are on the Web: "In 250 years of existence as a nation, the US has fought against 29 sovereign countries. (In Fact, since 1785, we have been involved, for 231 years, in some kind of war. And this wars, against all varieties of nations. From going against the Sultan of Morocco, to invading the tiny island of Grenada. Well, this means that in our entire history, we have only had 17 years of peace, and even fewer, cuz here the almost 5 years of our Civil War (Union/Confed 1861‒1865), are Not counted, since this war was not with another country, but against us. And the wars against the Native Nations of America either are not counted, for the same reason). Anyway: We fought against 29 countries. We have "Grown" 711 the size of our territory from the original 13 colonies. Our Economic, Political and Military development was established thanks to the Piracy, the Slavery, the Massacres, the Opium Trade or Cocaine Traffic, and the Weakness of many abused sovereign nations. We have provoked with total impunity, 12 Genocides ‒inside and outside our own borders‒, and Assassinations of Gov’t. Leaders, Coups d'État and Economic Blockades in 6 UN member nations. Between 1947 and 1989, the US tried to change other nations gov’ts 73 times. It includes 66 covert Ops. And 7 overt ones. In Civil Wars: The US has taken advantage of and intervened without justification in the following Civil Wars: In Marquesas Island. (Massacre. 1813). US Forces seize Nuku Hiva Island (French Polynesia 1813), and establish here «The First US Naval Base», in the Pacific. This historical fact is important, cuz in 1813, the US had NO Territorial Land nor Maritime Rights in the Pacific Ocean, until 1848, when the US seized California and other Mexican territories facing the Pacific. In Haiti (1813 and 1901 and then 1915-1919-1934-2001). In Hawaii (1889 and 1890-1893 and 1901). In Cuba (1898 and 1901-1902 and 1906 and 1913 and 1952 and again 1960). In Island of Samoa (1898-1899 and 1904). In Colombia (1899-1902 and 1948). In Mexico (1836 and 1847 and 1886 and 1904 and 1914 and again in 1916). In Russia (1918-1920). In the "Republic Banana Wars" of Central America. (Massacre. 1912-1934). In Dominican Republic. (1916-1924 and 1965-1966). In Honduras (1903 and 1912 and 1919 and 1924-1925 and again 2009). In Venezuela (1936 and 1945 and again in 1948). Military Coup in Peru (1948 and 1967). In China (1856-1859, and 1899-1901, and 1913 and 1933, and again in 1945-1946-1949). Military assistance to Chinese rebels in Taiwan (1951-1952). In Korea (1871 and 1950-1953). In Vietnam (Massacre and Genocide. 1959-1975). In Albania (1949-1953 and 1955). In Panama (1856, and 1903, and 1964-1968, and again 1989). In Brazil (1950 and 1959 and 1964 and again in 2016). Coup and Intervention in Guatemala (1944, and 1954, and 1966, and again 1982-1985). Coup and subsequent Fascist regime in Greece (1967). The Hunting for Che Guevara, in Bolivia (1968). US Military assistance in the Coup in Bolivia (Copper Mining Co. 1971). The “Bombing of Laos” (1971-1973). Terror in Uruguay. (Genocide. 1973). Support for the regime of Moboth, in Zaire (Genocide. 1974). Attack on Cambodia (Kampuchea. 1975). Democratic Republic of the Congo “Simba Rebellion”. (Massacre. 1964-1967 and 1975). Entry of US Troops into Nicaragua (1928-1932 Augusto Sandino, and 1937 and 1972-1973, and 1983 and again 1995). Coup in Chile. Salvador Allende. (Genocide. 1973-1976). Argentina (1976-1986). Support for the cannibal Jean-Bédel Bokassa, in Central African Republic. (Genocide. 1979). We, the US, assistance Saddam Hussein against Iran. (One Million dead in ten years. 1980-1990). Support and funding of the Khmer Rouge. (Genocide 1980). In Angola-Namibia. (Massacre. 1980-1981-1984). In Bosnia (1995)... In Libya, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, in Kosovo, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Afghanistan, etc. And more: We have almost 800 Military Bases scattered around the world; 93 of which are against China. On the other hand, China and Korea (The "Axis of Evil"), in 1,000 years of history have NEVER invaded anyone. These nations have fought their Civil Wars, defended themselves against foreign invasions, and secured their immediate borders, but they have never been meddling or aggressor countries. China is a Nation of Peace. China does NOT Attack anyone. China does NOT Invade nor does it Steal territories of other sovereign nations. China does NOT Intervene in any neighboring nor distant country. Do you know how many Military Bases China or Korea have outside their territory? None. Zero. Any. NADA! They do not have a single Military Base. (The “Chinese Military Base” in Djibouti is actually a Guard Post, with three Artillery Frigates and Choppters to protect against the Somali Pirates. And the “Chinese Military Base” of Patagonia, in Argentina. Well, you don't need to be an expert in strategy here to understand that this is nonsense, unless you think that the Chinese intend to keep all the ice in Antarctica. The Chinese will NOT put a Military Base 7,500 miles from the objective: Washington D.C. So in Argentina there, it is, a Radar Station for they Chinise Space Program. These are verifiable facts). Neither China nor Korea will invade the world; We do... that's DONE, as we do in the Middle East. Iran also does not have a SINGLE MILITARY BASE outside its national territory, and it is surrounded by 16 US Bases, and it is we who call the Iranians Terrorists. We R the Terrorists. --And now, we have ANOTHER WAR on our doorstep, for trying to inaugurate another Military Base in the Ukraine... WHO CARES!!! "War is a Business".

@@salvadorvizcarra769 Cope

What about "learning about" the fleetingly mentioned Arabic Slave Trade within Northern Africa, then? Seems to me that all of you fawners over this phony-authoritative video are looking for the thinnest excuses to justify your prejudiced hatred of all things European. Then I'll ask you to thoroughly denounce and distant yourselves from ALL THINGS EUROPEAN like cures and medical treatments from Malaria, the Guinea Worm, HIV, common bacterial infections curable by penicillin, clean drinking water filtration, refrigeration of compostable foods, etc., etc., etc. AD NAUSEAM! F-ING PHONIES YOU ALL ARE, EACH AND EVERY MEAN SPIRITED PREJUDICED ONE OF YOU! Prejudiced "racism" is practiced in all too great an abundance by every "race" worldwide, y'all!

wow,which went far after the mongols ,afros and arabs invaded europe!

@@chrisdayton35 What a typically condescending and snarky response ("Cope") from just another "holier than thou" Puritanical level smug know-nothing with an arrogantly authoritative-sounding-only voice that wreaks with entitlement and victimhood seeking! What a waste of the Earth's air you are, you wannabe Ivory Tower prognosticator and rewriter of history slanted in your feeble minded favor!

The Saharan Sahara Desert

Casa Blanca means white house. Costa Rica means rich coast. Puerto Rico means rich port. So what? A lot of meanings escape from the common knowledge. Most people dont know what Sahara means. So for us it makes the perfect sense to say Sahara the desert.

KY ..Ferrari La Ferrari

@Artem Kh Woosh?

East timor=east east

Here comes Civilization!

@Raine Riny 7 When the whites trekked to the interiors of the country, there was no development, no civilizations, nothing. Explain why the black languages did not have numerals , only "maningi "which means many.

@Raine Riny 7 Big difference between northern Africa and sub-sahara Africa. Egyptians were not black.

@Raine Riny 7 The pharoes were whites and only became darker when intermarried with the nubians. Black Africa has never produced a civilization.

@Raine Riny 7 Africans obviously had civilization. But those civilizations were 5,000 less technologically advanced than europeans. They were in the stone age. And no, egyptians are not black. Go to egypt and try to convince me they are the black and not arabic.

Isn't Oceania the smallest continent?

@@gustavosauro1882 Oceania isn't even an actual continent, you probably mean australia

@@whyiseverysinglehandletaken2 in my opinion,we gotta classify every island in a continent(even the tiny ones). So I think putting those islands in the Pacific together with Austrália is fine. And even though Australia occupies the entire continental area,calling it Australia would be confusing. But I also don't like the name Oceania, we should call it Australasia.

I suggest you independently research the subject and not blindly take the word of a UKposts video, you'll quickly realise how much war was necessary to oust the Europeans.

The diplomacy of nuclear annihilation is very persuasive

me too

me too

me too

me too

*me too*

Not only that... the african leaders and higher powers were willing to sell slaves. Which europeans did not

@Rapstick pardon me?

@@kasperknutsen8283 that's only half true, some wanted to sell slaves, some resisted slavery, simple as.

@@Echani3007 well ofcourse the slaves didn't consent this action. Still their tribe leaders sold them. That's a fact

@@kasperknutsen8283 No I'm not talking about the slaves resisting, I'm talking about leaders resisting. Specifically tribe and monarchy leaders against selling thier prisoners as slaves meanwhile others were notorious for selling them as slaves. Eg Queen Nzinga of Ndongo fought against slavery and others like king Diogo of Kongo did sometimes sell slaves to the Portoguese. Hence it's half true some did some didn't.

They didn't get to name their country. To they it shouldn't really even exist.

Obviously they didn't name it themselves 🤦🏽‍♂️

you dummy obviously they didnt name it after their oppressor

@@HaziAgat if that's a joke then it's a bad joke

Congo goes back to the Congo river which in turn gets its name from the Kongo Empire which existed a while back mostly in modern day Angola though.

The Iberian bros

@shield&sword peace lmao

@shield&sword peace I think you mean the Japanese

@@thebigsad9463 LMAO

shield&sword peace u are so stupid that was spain not portugal. Portugal was fair to all. Did not kill no babies. Did nothing that u say they did. Take history classes to know better.

*Chinese aid intensifies*

Privyet Tovarisch

that's called:"soo basically our multinationals get here, and they pay the Africans 2 dollars an hour to get (obviously without helmets and security measures) a shit ton of minerals" So yeah they pay like nothing the single African miner and they bribe the politician for the permissions

@@Ethiopianexposer Are you dumb or something? It's nothing to do with the Jews.

@@luxembourgishempire2826 You are all Jews

@FREE 3021 Africa will never become fully independent. Their goverments are too corrupt and the people are uneducated

God no...

Poland have colonies but partitions of Poland begin in 1772-1795 and lost independence to 1918

For a short period of time, one of the Polish-Lithuanian vassal states had small colonies in Trinidad and West Africa. Nothing super important, but still a little fun fact.

FREE 3021 you’re an exception, no offense. But Africa has never modernized, nor have they had any sort of golden age, enlightenment, etc. they’re stuck. And it isn’t due to colonization. If anything, the introduction of western civilization has benefitted them.

YoshiMusic999 canada is bigger than usa

@@bloxknight1145 Canada was colonised by UK

one day african country will say stop to Franceççç Then France will become poor countryç right now France still getting money african countrys and no1 saying anything only Turkey trying stop them. thats why France so mad to Turkey.

@@kayacenk4164 oh my god so France is tsking money from it’s old colonies?????

@@kayacenk4164 Not really chinese companies are taking recources from congo for assistance and such while europian countries are taking in millions of Africans Turkey is building dams to block the water support from iraq

*disappointed Poland lover noises*

Technicaly it was a colony of Duchy of Courland and Semgalia (South and West Latvia now) but it was a puppet of poland

Its the polish lithuanian commonwealth

The poles were victims in WW2, but they were not necessarily morally superior or anything.

@@deadby15 what

And in the future the Indians

@@jamesxia9523 Nope. nah, Not interested, we are Busy in our Development so We are Good Alone with our 2nd Largest market of WORLD. 😂

Jeet Sasmal When you've developed sufficiently your economic growth will slow down and you will quite possibly look towards Africa.

@@jamesxia9523 No india can't lol, it's got to focus on it's development, it's absurd corruption rates to ever think about embarking deals with Africa.

@@axelandersson6314 hope it never happen. We indians hate colonism.

If I'm correct, that was a catalyst for the abolition of the Portuguese monarchy.

Connor in charge yes He should do this

Connor in charge yes yes yes

It was between who ?

@@mtraa.942 britain ireland british america hanover prussia portugal brazil brunswick wolfenbuttel hesse kassel and schaumburg lippe vs france new france holy roman empire austria saxony russia spain new spain sweden and mughal empire

Connor in charge is it for school?

*Abyssinia.**

They were Christians for the longest time. That had its advantages.

@@billyjohnson3674 Ethiopia is a great Christian civilization. Respect

*they never took Ethiopia*

BillyJohnson367 excuse me what are u saying u don’t know anything about Ethiopians so u Better stop talking

I agree, Africans deserve waaayyyy better than they are now

Would you say so? It looks like Africa just reverted back to what it was before the European/Arab powers absorbed a lot of it; remember that much of what France was doing in West Africa had support from many of the tribes that were there, who specifically requested them to be there to attack other tribes. They would later join the French and help during World war 1 and 2.

naw I dont recall mali being one of the richest countries in the world@@imgreen2563

Gold coast= ghana bruh

@@ruzzou9536 There is a city in Australia called Gold Coast. But yeah, it was Ghana which was under British control.

When you try to travel to australia but end up in Ghana: *what*

😘😘👌👌

123 456 read your history books!

you lost the war, they defeated you, doesnt matter if they didnt manage to completely colonize you, they won, and you're a fool

123 456 we are taking about colonialism. Even though they won the initial war and occupied Ethiopia for 5 years the never colonized Ethiopia. You are missing the point.

@@enegess1479 no, you are missing the point, the moment your emperor left and italy definitely conquered ethiopia, the colonization started, you were being colonized, not occupied

Michael Brennan But was There still mass murder?

Augustus Caesar (the first emperor of Rome) personally owned Egypt...

It got much better...

@@the12th68 There never was mass murder to begin with. He didn't even "rule" there, he leased the lands to various companies, and they did some nasty shit there.

@@BamBamGT1 nee man, geef gewoon toe da leopold een massamoordenaar was. Ookal heeft hij daar nooit een fout in gezet, hij was wel de aanleiding dat miljoenen dood gingen. Je gaat toch ook niet zeggen dat Hitler amper iets fout heeft gedaan, want hij persoonlijk heeft geen miljoenen mens doodgeschoten, het waren zijn bevelen, en zo ook bij Leopold was het zijn doen dat ervoor gezorgd heeft

they don't produce the ideos, they just translate them from french (the original channel is french)

​@omg9261 still, I think they are the same person. They just translate into other languages

South Africa wasn’t a European power colonising Namibia, so I think that’s why he didn’t mention it, cause this vid’s specifically about the colonial empires

Yes, but they were acquired long before the age of Colonization. The areas are considered Spanish.

They are integral parts of Spain.

@@elovhak2354 They're not independent at all. They have special status but they don't have more powers than any administrative region in the Iberian peninsula. Source: I'm Spanish

@@elovhak2354 Tell me in what way you're independent

@@elovhak2354 Yeah, but as I said these are powers that other regions have too. You're not more independent than Catalonia or Madrid. Btw I haven't liked my comments people sometimes agree with your ideas you know

thats what they want u to believe......if u dont remove ur self from their equation u wont get the scheme

They killed Gaddafi because he wanted to stop that...

@@hnys7976 was that the sole reason why they killed gaddafi?

@@edofluit6568 He also wanted his own currency away from world bank and was heavily influenced by socialism when it came to social issues.

@@s.a.8548 true iff hhe would have done that the world would hce gone broke since he wanted to pay in gold...

Europe

Where does all that nonsense keep coming from? Leopold never even set foot there. He got the land, then leased it to various companies. He was like an absent landlord, that's the worst you can say about him.

@Phillis "Dick" Black These were self governing entities. There was a rebellion in one of their villages, the local abir guy in charge hired a cannibal tribe to go eat them (this actually happened) I can't say that the crimes the renter commits in the property of the landlord, are the landlord's fault. The 'A' in ABIR stands for Anglo, which is the reason the Brits so heavily focused on Blaming leopld, to hide their own connection to crimes against humanity committed by a parlty British company.

@@BamBamGT1 Leoupold profited and allowed the atrocities to take place. Over 10 million people died, it was literal genocide.

@@weasle2904 The change in population over a few decades has been studied by various people and is attributed to 3 main factors: 1 diseases, 2 famines, 3 natural decline of population due to birth rates dropping. There was no genocide.

Iberian Mapper what about Byzantine or Japan, or do you just mean out of the European Colonisers?

I mean the colonisers

The British Empire still exists but the word empire is something of a bad word that offends a lot of people these days so instead its called British Overseas Territories that consists of 250.000 people and nearly 700.000 square miles

@Finnish Perkele first off, stop saying Portugal and spain are European countries, they are not, they are arab, secondly, why the FUCK they trying to appear white and do the white mans work for them??? why didn't they just try to colonize Europe instead

@Finnish Perkele As far as i know those overseas territories aren't colonies anymore. For example, Macao was always Cantonese, while the Falklands are completely British. And at last, it was from 1415(Conquest of Ceuta) to 1999(Return of Macao) Meanwhile the English Empire only started in 1583 with the foundation of Newfoundland and ended in 1997 with the return of Macao. Even if we included the lasting territories until today, there are still 148 of years that the Portuguese colonial Empire lasted more(as it started 168 years earlier)

Nothing sad here, Mugabes policies should've spread to South Africa.

@@Ntombi_Red look at zimbabwe now and tell me if that would have been good for south africa

It was much more than that, the U.S gave Egypt billions in funds, and much of Egpyt's government was formed of SS lieutenants.

Yeah except he forgot to say what those colonizers did in those colonies and to the natives

I also liked how other recently independent African countries support other African colonies achieve independence

He isn't accurate because Ghana was the first country to be independent

you would’ve been a slave 💀

Why is it heart breaking?

@@teoteo3522 Cause Europe lost its territories.

@@Hienox u are sick in the head

womp womp 🗣🗣🔥🔥@@Hienox

Huh? Being enslaved is an obvious form of oppression.

2 things can be true at once my sister…

@@AddBowIfGirl Yes but ask yourself this: Who oppressed first? The Europeans to the Africans or An African King to another African King?

Long live South Africa! :) -Love from England

Noobtube Someone understands for once 😂😭 Soooo many people say we gained independence in 1910 or even 1961, like no one’s heard of 1931???

@@TerrierMartello the briish empire was the world's biggest teroris organizatin.

@@darylgrimes2601 ok...

Your actually learning the wrong history

@@senseisenpaianimes5612 Can you elaborate on the right history?

yes please tell us colonizer@@senseisenpaianimes5612

Not something to be proud of

If you look closely portugal and framce still have island too 😉

I research more and i realize that technically the british and even italians have some island in African territory

@@exfujoshiad2096 how is he not allowed to be proud of his country (spain) that took an island and still has it to this day.. kinda awesome ngl

@@TearDaTaco yeah took something that doesn't belong to them ....proud of stealing

As well as you omitted the independence of Namibia in 1990ies along with modernisation of South Africa to be more African.

You mean Cecil Rhodes, hence Rhodesia (former name of Zimbabwe)

Yes.. they are still selling their goods to a world market. How awful.

@JonnR Ragga Italy colonized southern Somalia. Also Djibouti is Somali land too and the majority natives are Somali. Ethiopia took the Ogaden region and Kenya the NFD region.

According to Somalis, Somalia has never been invaded or conquered. 🤣

@@CDRNY25 Well he's right in that the Italians really only had control in Mogadishu and parts of the Juba river. Somali sultans held sway in most of the country until the 1920s when Mussolini tried to establish a more Italian Somalia.

@@imperator692 Somalia resisted up-to 15y against 3 European powers

@@A.D.540 More than 15 years. Somalis had been resisting since the Europeans came to our land in the 1600s

However British Somaliland today is independent from Somalia.

@@pyrs9544 not yet but maybe in the future

And what a great success it has become today ???

@@jackkruese9929 As usual the British colonies are always better

@@keeganmoonshine7183 in reality if you go read about the Italian trust territory of Somaliland you can read that at the time (the 60s) it was much more wealthy that the British one, the problem with Somalia came with the Siad Barre the shitty communist dictator that genocided the northern population of ex British Somaliland, threw the country in to bad wars with Ethiopia. With his death the northern part saw the opportunity to free themself while the southern part was going trough a Civil war

This video is basically Europeans worst nightmare

Rhodesia was so much better while ruled by whites

@iuvenis animo But America was never a white nation to begin with. It is completely different with African Americans as they didn't go to America voluntary.

@iuvenis animo Yes but African-Americans are different to White South Africans. White South Africans ancestors left by choice. African Americans are people who were kidnapped. They don't have much similarities.

iuvenis animo into the ground

First world incels who haven't read a single book on post colinial African history praise the state or Rhodesia LMAO.

Ottomans did not have a colonist mentality.

​​@@Tenaciouss666of course they did. They colonized the Balkans, western Arabia, Iraq and Egypt.

@@HiHo-zh4rd Ottomans invested heavily on the Balkans and they lost it. Unlike other states, Ottomans saw the territories they conquered as their own, not like a colony.

@@Tenaciouss666 yes, enslaving the inhabitants and living in their houses. But once they settled in Constantinople that became the center. Palestine was not developed. Nothing was further developed other than regional administrative centers like everyone does.

maybe you should look at how they tried to colonise Romania@@Tenaciouss666

Majority of people in the comment section are adults.

The same for you

You are on history video we talk about history, if u want to talk about football just go on football match video like I do when I want to talk about football

U call intellegwnt people wierd?

@@Wiktor33 unfortunately you're not one of them

**happy Yakko's World music starts playing**

As a South African it was wild to me to find out that we colonized Namibia at some point, I was a bit disappointed that the video didn't touch on Namibia gaining its independence from SA and apartheid. Overall it was a good video.

Nah. I seen worse.

this is how it starts

@@sharkfinbite balkan comment section??? 😂😂😂

@@matiasguerra591 yeah and atheists vs religious

@Mr. Anonymous Indians vs pakisthanis

I know I'm late lol But are you saying that Africans just gave their land up to Europeans wasn't there wars but Africa's lost

@@gwtekz7796 On most occasions African Kings allowed Europeans to build coastal trading posts, it was a two way street these coastal kingdoms got access to European goods, who do you think went into the interior to catch slaves? Clue it wasn't the Europeans. Europeans set up these trading posts all over the world as a first step, in India, China, South East Asia etc. Africa was actually the last continent to be colonised

@@Spartan-jg4bf yeah so I'm asking after the king's and chiefs cooperated with Europeans did the Europeans kill the kings and chiefs to take over the land

@@Spartan-jg4bf because when they talk about colonisation they make it seem like the Europeans went into African countries peacefully and were welcomed with open arms or did the Europeans commit genocides

@@gwtekz7796 Did the chiefs kill other chiefs to take over their land? People have been taking other people's land throughout human history, there are no good or bad guys. Like I said earlier Africa was the last continent to be occupied by Europeans

Hmmmm

@Dante Alighieri look africa its a greek word : Αφρική = africa = afro

greeks and Egyptians were black dumbass, not white like you look in your profile picture, nowadays the only people that inhabit Greece and Egypt are arab colonizers, invaders, not the original inhabitants

@@jermainjackson8626 I can accept you saying that the egyptians were black, but the greeks? Mate I hope you're joking.

@Son of Kemet Then what were they? They certainly weren't white. In fact what's your definition of black?

PliantSanity you’re just a dumb victim, my friend. Even if they were black, they were not related to you. Stop trying to steal the history of others

thank you tho

As a hoi4 player I also agree

Same

Western Sahara is Spanish colonization

Bro before colonisation morocco has the entire Sahara and parts of West algeria .💀

No

The history of China would be a fuck long video