Complete Guide To Starship: Falcon 9 VS Starship. What's new? What's different?

  Переглядів 3,564,567

Everyday Astronaut

Everyday Astronaut

День тому

SpaceX is taking everything up a notch with Starship. This thing is the ultimate challenge in aerospace engineering, a FULLY and rapidly reusable super heavy lift launch vehicle, capable of taking 150 metric tonnes to low Earth orbit.
But Starship’s ultimate goal goes way beyond just terrestrial orbital ambitions, Starship is the first vehicle designed to actually take human beings to Mars and back again.
In order to achieve this absolutely bonkers goal, SpaceX has had to employ a litany of new technologies, use new materials, develop the most advanced rocket engines ever made and come up with some wild ideas that have never been tried before… and maybe for good reason.
So today I wanted to go over all of these new technologies and compare it to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy to help point out what things are new, what things are different and what they’ve learned from the Falcon family that will apply to Starship in order to really understand just how ambitious this project is.
We won’t be just scratching the surface here, in fact we’ll actually be taking you inside the rockets and showing you basically every single part and going over all of them with a fine tooth comb so you can learn as much as possible and have a definitive guide to Starship.
Article version - www.everydayastronaut.com/def...
Starship Playlist - • Playlist
Is SpaceX's Raptor engine the king of rocket engines? - • Is SpaceX's Raptor eng...
A conversation with Elon Musk about Starship - • A conversation with El...
SLS Vs Starship: Why does SLS still exist? - • SLS VS Starship: Why d...
Why won't Starship have an abort system? - • Why won’t Starship hav...
Why SpaceX switched to stainless steel - • Why SpaceX ditched lig...
Why SpaceX's Starship will fall like a skydiver and not fly - • Why SpaceX’s Starship ...
Will Starship make Artemis better than Apollo? - • Can Starship Help Make...
Why Starship will only have 2 rear fins instead of 3 - • Why does Starship only...
How much do rockets pollute? - • How Much Do Rockets Po...
Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro
05:05 - What's the same
06:00 - What’s Different // Engines and Fuels
23:05 - What's Different // Size, Capabilities, Construction, Costs
32:15 - What's Different // First Stage Reuse
41:50 - What's Different // Second Stage Reuse
53:40 - Conclusion
-------------------------
Special thanks to Caspar Stanley, subscribe to his channel! - / stanleycreative
Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! - / everydayastronaut
Extra special thanks to my Mission Directors who are producers for these videos! - Matthew Rutledge, Jeff Hutchinson, Ruben Maier-Gerber, Austin Murnane, Frans de Wet, Chad Souter, Sam Fisher, Jason Kelnhofer, pexis petersons, Eric Beavers, Arthur Carty, Lawrence Mansour, DLB,Joshua Rule, David Glover, Scott G Raderstorf, Nicholas T. Gallman, Max Haot, John Malkin, TTTA, Jared smith, Simon Pilkington, Héctor Ramos, Tomdmay and Mac Malkawi
Or become a UKposts member for some bonus perks as well! - / @everydayastronaut
The best place for all your space merch needs!
everydayastronaut.com/shop/
All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastronaut.com/music
I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on UKposts / ourludicrousfuture

КОМЕНТАРІ: 5 400
@lschaaf611
@lschaaf611 3 роки тому
Tim Dodd: I'll just do a short video while they wait for SLS Vs. Starship Pt. 3 Me 2 weeks later: Yay!! Another documentary Love Your Work!
@Ingens_Scherz
@Ingens_Scherz 3 роки тому
He is terrific, right? I'm so glad I found this channel. It's just the perfect expression of an excitement about space I haven't felt since the first Shuttle launch when I was a little boy.
@lschaaf611
@lschaaf611 3 роки тому
@@Ingens_Scherz He is the one who got me so excited about spaceflight!
@carljohan9265
@carljohan9265 3 роки тому
Whenever Tim says he will be deep diving into the details about something, I reflexively smile in response. Love hearing Tim talk for hours about nerdy space stuff :)
@lschaaf611
@lschaaf611 3 роки тому
@@carljohan9265 me too
@tomottodockter2072
@tomottodockter2072 3 роки тому
agreed, has there ever been such a thing as a short video by Timm
@Victor-rx4fv
@Victor-rx4fv 3 роки тому
1:00:00 long video and it’s not a random lo fi playlist. That’s art and dedication right there
@gumbygomes3278
@gumbygomes3278 3 роки тому
Tim makes the music that he uses in his videos
@scholtzm8
@scholtzm8 3 роки тому
i know all that is pretty far away..but elon should fly tim in his rocket..this guy is huge for spacex
@georgehayward7668
@georgehayward7668 3 роки тому
He’s interviewed Elon once that I know of, and Elon actually engaged with Tim. It wasn’t a run of the mill type thing. I love this channel, I was supposed to going to see a launch this year but then everything went tits up and we all stayed home. I’m hoping that next year will be better and it would be great to try and get to a launch when Tim’s there.
@joshmumpower4077
@joshmumpower4077 3 роки тому
Great job brada Tim really enjoy watching your productions really hope youtube get your live stream right for the test flight of sn8
@uzz32carl
@uzz32carl 3 роки тому
@@georgehayward7668 tits up...love it
@mrblurleighton
@mrblurleighton 2 роки тому
"This maneuver will make the Falcon 9's landing look like a walk in the park" May 2021 Update: They did it man
@thenegotiator9701
@thenegotiator9701 2 роки тому
Update; they put one together, for fun.
@colegustafson199
@colegustafson199 2 роки тому
@@thenegotiator9701 edit a month later they took it apart and put it back together again and are almost ready for an actual suborbital launch
@daanzoomer2997
@daanzoomer2997 2 роки тому
Wel that was just a suborbital landing test
@fullflowaerospace
@fullflowaerospace Рік тому
May 2022 update: wait when was the last time we flew a starship?
@nickhilbert9376
@nickhilbert9376 Рік тому
August 2022 update: Starship will be doing an orbital flight in the coming months.
@andrewedmunds4583
@andrewedmunds4583 3 роки тому
Replacing the CGI image of starship with the real sn8 in the thumbnail, veeeeery sneaky.
@nagarjunkashyap5987
@nagarjunkashyap5987 3 роки тому
I thought it was a new video😅 Till I saw the date added
@skm8838
@skm8838 3 роки тому
Sneaky
@Azmythometre
@Azmythometre 3 роки тому
@@nagarjunkashyap5987 Same
@garybensman1358
@garybensman1358 3 роки тому
Has anyone witnessed the overhead bridge crane in the high Bay being used for stacking?
@DarkBraveStuff
@DarkBraveStuff 3 роки тому
yes
@annego
@annego 3 роки тому
40:04 "Hovering is just 100% a waste of fuel" *Shows video of New Shepard* Well thats a creative way to bash Blue Origin.
@Scott_C
@Scott_C 3 роки тому
You edited but hovering is still misspelled. ... shhh.. I won't tell.
@abeeinspace
@abeeinspace 3 роки тому
I think you meant New Shepard instead of Blue Shepard also
@GenasysMech
@GenasysMech 3 роки тому
The "Feather", aka making a small fortune out of a big one....he just cashed out 3 billion of Lizard stock...
@tscchope
@tscchope 3 роки тому
@@abeeinspace ... and thereby avoided a copyright strike ...
@tuhinmia1967
@tuhinmia1967 3 роки тому
"The SLS, wait... That's already a thing" I could not stop laughing XD
@richardmalcolm1457
@richardmalcolm1457 3 роки тому
The last time I was this early, Tim was wearing a pumpkin suit.
@chickentakeover2076
@chickentakeover2076 3 роки тому
Lol.
@HarshRaj-xd6ix
@HarshRaj-xd6ix 3 роки тому
😂
@GabrielRodriguez-cu4do
@GabrielRodriguez-cu4do 3 роки тому
Lol
@caitlinwarren461
@caitlinwarren461 3 роки тому
Lol
@declan9876
@declan9876 3 роки тому
Lol
@mrinal6917
@mrinal6917 3 роки тому
This was the total opposite of spending an hour in math class. At the end i was like why is this ending so soon LOL
@robertmartin1226
@robertmartin1226 3 роки тому
I don’t know when I have ever heard a technical presentation so well put together (content) and so well delivered. The presentation was enthusiastic, perfectly paced with excellent voice control, and so clear and understandable. Fantastic job. Thank you
@franklinkz2451
@franklinkz2451 Рік тому
Your knees hurting
@janmelantu7490
@janmelantu7490 3 роки тому
“You might call it a Starship Launch System…SLS” incredible
@LA-MJ
@LA-MJ 3 роки тому
Literally loled
@michaelburkey5358
@michaelburkey5358 3 роки тому
So, once SpaceX gets Starship flying, NASA can just quietly leave all their updates to Congress as "SLS" while changing just the glossary.
@ryanpoisson8403
@ryanpoisson8403 3 роки тому
Omg that was the best !!!
@steveLiteable
@steveLiteable 3 роки тому
It sounded like he was trolling for a second.
@emirduarrr1214
@emirduarrr1214 3 роки тому
CMIIW, it was Kate Tice that first came up with Starship Launch System, during the water tower stream.
@ElectronChaser38
@ElectronChaser38 3 роки тому
Instant like for the early SLS joke.
@felreymiguel5734
@felreymiguel5734 3 роки тому
S pace L aunch S ystem *AND* S tarship L aunch S ystem
@bru6104
@bru6104 3 роки тому
Bruh nasas sls :am I a joke to you
@nalle5227
@nalle5227 3 роки тому
I gotchu 3:30
@shifa-8423
@shifa-8423 3 роки тому
Me too @ElectronChaser38
@protomors
@protomors 3 роки тому
It could be abbreviated as SSLS - StarShip Launch System. But simply "Starship" sounds even better.
@sytzeboerstra9581
@sytzeboerstra9581 3 роки тому
3 months later: Starship lands successfully
@jorgenarnesen-lerudsmoen6929
@jorgenarnesen-lerudsmoen6929 3 роки тому
More importantly, hopped twice in one day :D Very rapid reusability :lul:
@sytzeboerstra9581
@sytzeboerstra9581 3 роки тому
@@jorgenarnesen-lerudsmoen6929 haha :lul:
@benjy_3264
@benjy_3264 3 роки тому
You could say it hopped 3 times. 1mm hop in the abort. The successful hop. and the boom
@DarkBraveStuff
@DarkBraveStuff 3 роки тому
@@jorgenarnesen-lerudsmoen6929 rap unscheduled disa- flight
@alt8791
@alt8791 3 роки тому
Well yes, but actually no
@janemcgann8650
@janemcgann8650 2 роки тому
Enjoying rewatching this after SN15’s successful landing today :)
@clart658
@clart658 3 роки тому
Alright, whoever came up with that SLS joke is amazing.
@user-lv7ph7hs7l
@user-lv7ph7hs7l 3 роки тому
The Starship users guide refers to a Starship Launch System. SpaceX came up with the joke.
@l4ur4nt78
@l4ur4nt78 3 роки тому
I'm pretty sure we all got it the first time🌚
@danwhiffen9235
@danwhiffen9235 3 роки тому
I’ll bet the SLS will be waaaaay better than the SLS...
@sallltynacl
@sallltynacl 3 роки тому
Hey Tim, I’m sure you’ve heard this from a lot of your viewers, but I just can’t express how great you are for making these beefy videos filled with information, and your delivery of these information is practically the reason why I continue to watch your content, because it really shows that you love what you do and that you love what you talk about, keep up the amazing content man.
@donkisiko
@donkisiko 3 роки тому
I second this!
@rizdalegend
@rizdalegend 3 роки тому
Third this
@kenrupert6041
@kenrupert6041 3 роки тому
4 th .. Thanks Tim !!
@kaweesirobert3267
@kaweesirobert3267 3 роки тому
I 5th this!
@DavidJohnson-tv2nn
@DavidJohnson-tv2nn 3 роки тому
A great video with a lot of technical information. But something Tim neglected to mention.... The most important difference.... Falcon 9/Crew Dragon having launch abort is safe for human spaceflight. Starship without launch abort is a deathtrap!
@roborchiston9419
@roborchiston9419 3 роки тому
You're a genius Tim. Thanks for dumbing this down into plain language. Your mission has been accomplished. Love your content.
@TosteKSP
@TosteKSP 3 роки тому
Probably a good decision on SpaceX’s part to call the booster Superheavy rather than ‘falcon 30’
@UrbanWindowFarmer
@UrbanWindowFarmer 3 роки тому
I now have enough information to build a starship in my garage. Thanks, Tim.
@greggswanson58
@greggswanson58 3 роки тому
If you need help making the raptors, give me a call!
@inconnudetousse1929
@inconnudetousse1929 3 роки тому
I have a soldering gun, maybe I can help for the rings.
@UrbanWindowFarmer
@UrbanWindowFarmer 3 роки тому
@@inconnudetousse1929 The team is coming together nicely!
@OzAndyify
@OzAndyify 3 роки тому
I've got a drill-press and a 3D printer. Just have to get those Raptors working under 220 degrees. How hard can it be?
@_Elkov
@_Elkov 3 роки тому
I have a hammer and a screwdriver. Can I come over, too?
@steceriotti5883
@steceriotti5883 3 роки тому
There's something in the fact that it's precisely 1 hour long that particularly satisfies me...
@benjy_3264
@benjy_3264 3 роки тому
Almost as precise as starships landing. 😂
@DarkBraveStuff
@DarkBraveStuff 3 роки тому
yeah
@williamthomas5780
@williamthomas5780 3 роки тому
Got recommended. Grateful for it. Informative. Impressive. Not a dull watch at all for me.
@ChaJ67
@ChaJ67 3 роки тому
Top notch video and well appreciated. As for speculations I have for future development, here you go: 1. SpaceX is already using solar electric propulsion for Starlink. As most of what you ship to the moon is fuel to push more fuel around and SpaceX has already proposed landing a massive Starship on the moon, which is going to take a lot more fuel than what can be loaded onto a single Starship in LEO, especially for reuse, I think they will use a solar electric space tug launched on on Starship to push tanker Starships out to the moon. The ISP on these solar electric drives already exceed 4,000s of ISP where Raptor vacuum gets up to 350s, so even with the extra mass of a space tug and the loss of using the Oberth Effect, it would be far more efficient and require far fewer launches than to LOX/LNG the whole way. Elon Musk has stated Starship should have very little fuel boil off on the way to Mars, so why would there be an issue spending say several weeks slowly pushing a tanker to the moon? I am thinking this could also be done for cargo only missions, except using a cargo Starship instead of a tanker Starship. The reason for pushing a tanker Starship to the moon would only be so a crewed mission could happen rapidly instead of at the slow pace of a solar powered ion drive in the Earth-Moon system. 2. Something cool about the cargo space tug idea when applied to Mars is while the space tugs will produce a lot less thrust around Mars, with cargo you mainly have to eventually get the job done. Also a space tug could separate from a cargo Starship before entering Mar's orbit and start its capture burn while the cargo Starship continues to the surface or swing by Mars and go back to Earth. Once the space tug gets into a highly elliptical capture orbit, it could circularize with its large delta-V potential and say get into a low Mars or low Earth orbit. The cargo Starships sent out to Mars could either be optimized with small fuel tanks designed to get an empty Starship into LEO and then once refueled and loaded with cargo, land the maximum amount of cargo on Mars in a one way mission or be a more generic cargo ship with some hardware for unloading on Mars and be able to fly back to an orbiting space tug to be brought back to Earth. Having a space tug with over 4,000s of ISP capability really expands the possibilities of what can be done for cargo missions, granted it just takes too long to speed up to be the primary mover on crewed missions. 3. I think the first generation of 'safe' crewed transport to Mars will involve building large scale nuclear thermal propulsed spaceships as that will get you up to ~1,000s of ISP, which really changes the dynamic of how a Mars mission could go while having enough thrust to do things quickly with either nuclear electric or solar electric drives to help speed along the 'coast' phase of the mission. Once we are gathering material from the moon, an important overlooked material is nuclear fuel. If you gather the nuclear fuel from the moon, you avoid a lot of fallout from trying to ship that nuclear fuel up from Earth with hopefully controlled explosions into space and the controversy attempting such a thing would cause. You really can't do a safe crewed mission to Mars without nuclear power shipped to the surface of Mars as one dust storm covering your solar panels and your crew dies, so it makes sense to extend this nuclear power into making the trip to Mars in the first place faster and safer as well as more comfortable. One reason why you need to go big with a crewed mission is surface area to protect from radiation is a square factor where volume covered by that shielding is a cubic factor. So as you go bigger, that shielding goes from being too heavy to eventually being a relatively trivial part of your space ship mass wise. There is a second thing where task optimized Starships are going to be a lot more effective at their job than jack of all trades Starships. So you do a jack of all trades Starship to Mars, maybe you stick 10 people on a one way mission to Mars and the Starship is loaded up with shielding and provisions and space to move around and equipment for once you get to Mars, etc. Also maybe some crews can handle the isolation and some crews go nuts and space each other on the way to Mars. However have a fleet of task optimized Starships riding on a mother ship to Mars allowing for tight coordination and your crewed lander Starship carries 100 or more people airliner fashion to the surface and then flies back up to refuel and carry another 100 or more people to the surface. A large ship means you can have thousands of people onboard and lots of space to move around, which is a lot easier to cope with than say 10 people trapped in a tin can for a long duration mission. Having a large ship also provides more room for trying out artificial gravity, though would think the artificial gravity experiments would be done in LEO first to determine what exactly would need to be done for this large ship going to Mars. Also such a large ship would always be in space and so would be optimized for a permanent space environment going between the Earth and Mars cruise liner style where Starship could then be left to focus on being a short haul airliner of sorts. If a good nuclear fission propulsion system could be achieved where maybe low to no fallout fuel is used around Earth while avoiding big flashes that could harm satellites in orbit (or even blind people looking up) and then you do whatever is cheapest a safe distance away from Earth, the efficiency gained in propulsion could allow very fast trips to anywhere in the solar system. So far with our fusion work we tend to go big to get the economies of scale to make it work and be more practical, so a large dedicated ship for this makes a lot of sense. Chemical rockets just cannot do such a job of going to and from Mars because the ISP is not there and so say a Mars mission is a one way mission with it being rather impractical to in-situ manufacture the large amount of fuel needed to send say a 9m wide Starship back. Nuclear thermal exponentially improves the equation to it at least being somewhat practical, though still somewhat expensive to go back and forth between Earth and Mars, but a lot cheaper, faster, safer, and more comfortable than doing chemical only. Ion drives makes it a lot cheaper to move cargo and fuel around and this is important because fuel tends to get a lot more expensive the further out from Earth you are, at least until you figure out a system of getting it from the solar system, which we are way far from doing in a practical manner right now, granted it should be doable one day with the right setup. Direct nuclear propulsion can really open up the solar system, though some thoughtfulness needs to go into the safest designs possible, especially when operating around Earth, which is really important because literally no humans live beyond LEO right now and at that the current count in LEO is 7. So if it is not safe to use that drive in LEO, another drive system will be needed to get to a safe distance away from Earth, but this leg of your journey is a huge part of your battle for basically every mission, so your drive system really needs to try to solve this problem if it can be done.
@MrGoesBoom
@MrGoesBoom 3 роки тому
Still amuses/amazes me how Elon engages with you and others that actually show interest in the technical specifics of SpaceX rather than the general bland stuff mainstream media tends to focus on. Like he seems super happy to geek out on this stuff with you guys
@pmj_studio4065
@pmj_studio4065 3 роки тому
If you know MBTI - Elon is most likely an INTJ, Tim to me looks like an ENTP. That alone is a decent reason why they can get on so well:)
@Chuckiele
@Chuckiele 3 роки тому
I can fully understand him though. Hes mainly an engineer with huge ambitions and it must be a nightmare for him to stand on a stage and have to tell people the same story over and over that theyre not gonna understand anyway. Of course he would rather be with other geeks that share the same dreams and discuss about how to achieve them.
@asahiorbit4565
@asahiorbit4565 3 роки тому
@@Chuckiele I notice how Elon dumbs down some of his ideas so the public can understand what he's saying.
@Chuckiele
@Chuckiele 3 роки тому
@@asahiorbit4565 yeah but you can see how uncomfortable it makes him.
@esaedvik
@esaedvik 3 роки тому
I'm constantly surprised by this since his social media presence just started irritating me personally so much that I had to unfollow. I do love that he does engage with fellow nerds though. Love getting some first hand data into videos like this. Absolutely priceless.
@yahikotendo5631
@yahikotendo5631 3 роки тому
The video is exactly 1 hour... That's so satisfying!
@EeekiE
@EeekiE 3 роки тому
What a colossal effort putting this video together. Extremely well done.
@dustyk9409
@dustyk9409 3 роки тому
I keep replaying this video every so often as starship progress continues and I am amazed at how much I learn each time. Well done Tim.
@PhantomMods4
@PhantomMods4 3 роки тому
Not only is this a great video, it’s exactly one hour. *satisfied*
@shifa-8423
@shifa-8423 3 роки тому
*satisfied*
@ryancg6439
@ryancg6439 3 роки тому
*satisfied*
@pseudonayme7717
@pseudonayme7717 3 роки тому
OCD, retracted
@PhantomMods4
@PhantomMods4 3 роки тому
@@pseudonayme7717 Bruh you just gave me ocd
@charliemoore9165
@charliemoore9165 3 роки тому
satisfied
@nicholasspence480
@nicholasspence480 3 роки тому
Hey Tim....Don't stop making long form content. The deep dives are great even if I have to wait a while
@MakeMySanctuary
@MakeMySanctuary 3 роки тому
Totally agree!!!! Love the niblits
@sofianeloum7746
@sofianeloum7746 3 роки тому
Im not agree
@KennyPeard
@KennyPeard 3 роки тому
@ronnakansonglin9902
@ronnakansonglin9902 3 роки тому
Welp there goes being productive this hour
@djschultz1970
@djschultz1970 2 роки тому
Thank you Scott! You covered all the questions the others haven't yet. Great episode!
@cseblivestreaming8073
@cseblivestreaming8073 3 роки тому
The fact that he produces this, and an article version for free is honestly impressive as hell
@lustfulvengance
@lustfulvengance 3 роки тому
He doesn't do it for free he gets a shitload of money from UKposts!
@cseblivestreaming8073
@cseblivestreaming8073 3 роки тому
@@lustfulvengance i know he does, but it’s still nothing compared to professional productions
@usernamewastaken17
@usernamewastaken17 3 роки тому
Imagine Using Starship to deploy a single small cube-sat, only to flex on every competitor because its cheaper...
@spoony8232
@spoony8232 3 роки тому
It can pick up some of their junk while it's up there.
@kleinerprinz99
@kleinerprinz99 3 роки тому
Considering a flight to the moon is alteast 100 million Dollars per Vehicle.. yeah cheaper than Electron or Falcon 9 I think not.
@pranavbakre5201
@pranavbakre5201 3 роки тому
@@kleinerprinz99 I think he said deploying a satellite into earths orbit. not moons
@gabrielchanel4448
@gabrielchanel4448 3 роки тому
@@kleinerprinz99 they dont have to launch everytime just to take single small debri, starship can pick up multiple debris at the same time since its payload bay is so massive, yeah right
@cheaterman49
@cheaterman49 3 роки тому
I'm honestly not sure the numbers actually do add up, considering fuel and crew costs. RE: fuel, also do consider the amount of dead mass - if Rocket Lab manages to make the cost of Electron marginal through reuse, it sure would use up a lot less fuel (and presumably less crew/time as well), so it really should be cheaper no matter what.
@gailharaldson2252
@gailharaldson2252 3 роки тому
Well, since there seems to be a “fleet” of starships, seems we need Star Fleet Command running the show.
@cjnelson8627
@cjnelson8627 2 роки тому
Lol
@adammarkiewicz3375
@adammarkiewicz3375 2 роки тому
Thinking out of the box: While having fleet of starships (and that's what Elon is really aiming for): Why burn the fuel to reverse heavy booster back to original starting point? Wouldn't it be better to have second facility at the other side of Earth and head there forward? Besides less fuel needed (you need only to stop, not to reverse and go back), you could have customers from the other side of Earth much closer. Just a thought.
@439sparky1
@439sparky1 2 роки тому
@@adammarkiewicz3375 Sure but you need to somehow transport that booster back to the original site for a second launch
@adammarkiewicz3375
@adammarkiewicz3375 2 роки тому
@@439sparky1 No! You need a second launch point. That's what I meant. Even if you need a small trip, transport on the ground would require much less fuel than turning around midair and flying back.
@439sparky1
@439sparky1 2 роки тому
@@adammarkiewicz3375 But what if you want a quicker turnaround. It takes starship 2 mins to fly back while ground transport will last days or weeks
@nicklebar4668
@nicklebar4668 3 роки тому
Just a amazing video brother. You nailed it, very well said and extremely in depth. Great job and keep up the good work. Nick from Toronto
@adis95
@adis95 3 роки тому
"I'll be intervewing Elon Musk AGAIN very soon..." what an absolute flex. Great vid!!!
@LaughingOrange
@LaughingOrange 3 роки тому
That is nothing, he sells Elon's favourite shirt. And almost every tweet with a question to Elon is answered.
@davebrooks69
@davebrooks69 3 роки тому
Yeah, its because he's secretly trying to get Elon to give him a free ride to Mars!
@subramaniamtg1108
@subramaniamtg1108 3 роки тому
Hahaha
@petercrowhurst
@petercrowhurst 3 роки тому
Adi S sits in corner still drawing prototype model A fords .......
@paulknight5018
@paulknight5018 3 роки тому
Winny Tim "But I don't wanna go to Mars!!" Lol
@ryanhamstra49
@ryanhamstra49 3 роки тому
“Hovering is a waste of fuel” *shows clip of blue origin* Jeff bezos “Heyyyyy.......”
@robertoc.4432
@robertoc.4432 3 роки тому
lol
@joshbreaksk8IN
@joshbreaksk8IN 3 роки тому
I thought the same thing lmfao
@alt8791
@alt8791 3 роки тому
When referring to Blue Origin please use the abbreviation “BO.” “Blue Origin” is a general term for any useless suborbital vehicle.
@malemute4378
@malemute4378 3 роки тому
Jeff who?
@warrenayres200
@warrenayres200 3 роки тому
Jeff... who?
@NeilFiertel
@NeilFiertel 2 роки тому
This is the best explanations of engine design ever. I have learned hugely from this and thank you for this!
@shannonparkhill5557
@shannonparkhill5557 2 роки тому
Just joined your Patreon! Keep making these sweet deep dive videos, please!! :) I love the way you do the graphs!
@WasatchWind
@WasatchWind 3 роки тому
3:30 😄 How about Starship Transport System or STS? wait...
@UNSCPILOT
@UNSCPILOT 3 роки тому
Or Starship Mission System, SMS ... oh
@ryanhamstra49
@ryanhamstra49 3 роки тому
Starship-Superheavy transmartian orbiter or SSTO......
@bourne1012
@bourne1012 3 роки тому
Are these Star Trek jokes?
@randomguy0047
@randomguy0047 3 роки тому
@@bourne1012 STS = Shuttle, SMS = text messaging (duh), SSTO = Single Stage To Orbit
@mnh1270
@mnh1270 3 роки тому
Extraplanetary Starship Apparatus? ESA? Too silly? Okay....
@Rjysrb
@Rjysrb 3 роки тому
The fleet of starships may be called 'StarFleet' (?)
@JohnDavidDunlap
@JohnDavidDunlap 3 роки тому
Yes please
@sean21868
@sean21868 3 роки тому
Yeah
@eluder25rs
@eluder25rs 3 роки тому
And the people living on newly build bases on the Moon and Mars will be called StarCitizens O.O
@kyleyamada1313
@kyleyamada1313 3 роки тому
@@eluder25rs they will be in development for 10 years though
@malcolmdavid722
@malcolmdavid722 3 роки тому
Surely not..... if they did, it would have to be managed by a 'Federation' !
@Easedaray
@Easedaray 3 роки тому
"They both have boosters with landing legs and grid fins." Elon: no
@lindagauntt4712
@lindagauntt4712 Місяць тому
SpaceX and SpaceShip great job✨️✨️🚀✨️✨️🚀✨️✨️
@DeaPeaJay
@DeaPeaJay Рік тому
35:00 whatever that debris is, it looks like a little man running away from the rocket. 😂
@NoahB-gj5fg
@NoahB-gj5fg 3 роки тому
Welp there goes being productive this hour
@DJ_Level_3
@DJ_Level_3 3 роки тому
This is absolutely productive, right? ...please tell me it is
@poormantravelers311
@poormantravelers311 3 роки тому
i know right
@ironspider9280
@ironspider9280 3 роки тому
Exactlyyyy... lol c'mon Tim.
@fcogradion4823
@fcogradion4823 3 роки тому
@@DJ_Level_3 100%
@jackbruh3397
@jackbruh3397 3 роки тому
69 likes nice
@jherrinjr
@jherrinjr 3 роки тому
Here we go! Got my popcorn, comfy chair and blanket!
@jacobbeitner8796
@jacobbeitner8796 3 роки тому
I need to go back to zoom school in 2 mins ;(
@kyleking3839
@kyleking3839 3 роки тому
@@jacobbeitner8796 same
@alexdroner4068
@alexdroner4068 3 роки тому
on the contrary man, got my shake , treadmill and shirt off :)
@johnkean6852
@johnkean6852 3 роки тому
Yes its a sci fi movie almost yes fiction defo
@ericmaroney2466
@ericmaroney2466 3 роки тому
You seem to be a reliable source, and I appreciate that.
@AndersonSouza-ri3fb
@AndersonSouza-ri3fb 3 роки тому
not only the hard work making the video, the passion of talking of something you really like gives me a new vision about the evolution of the spaceX. thanks a lot, won a subscriber!!
@EverydayAstronaut
@EverydayAstronaut 3 роки тому
Awww thanks! Lots more coming!
@silas-the-person3895
@silas-the-person3895 2 роки тому
@@EverydayAstronaut hi tim big fan love your content and you haf made my wanna be a aerospace engineer our astronaut
@jarodatkinson5306
@jarodatkinson5306 3 роки тому
When you started talking about stainless steel construction, I immediately flashed back to Doc Brown explaining the Delorean lol....
@RiderV6
@RiderV6 3 роки тому
😂
@GameHardYT
@GameHardYT 3 роки тому
Lool
@gabrielchanel4448
@gabrielchanel4448 3 роки тому
Me Before: omg this is so long Me Now: WhY iS tHiS sO sHorT
@user-uh9hq5zi3u
@user-uh9hq5zi3u 3 роки тому
Making 1:00:00 percieved as 0:10:00 shows a great professional level of author.
@doodletanki6661
@doodletanki6661 3 роки тому
thats what she said
@shifa-8423
@shifa-8423 3 роки тому
Why is this so short? Really
@Caddiken
@Caddiken 3 роки тому
😂🤣😂
@jcdavis5871
@jcdavis5871 3 роки тому
Me too lol...I shied away from his content cus it was so long, but it was reccommended so much i had to watch something and BOY was i missing out
@raymondjordan9682
@raymondjordan9682 3 роки тому
And you too Tim! For all you do and keep us grounded.
@liambenn1214
@liambenn1214 3 роки тому
Well “definitive” is out of the window now, considering Elon has stated he wants to literally catch super heavy rather than just land it
@georgesgregorius5752
@georgesgregorius5752 3 роки тому
Has to invent the flight catcher :-) (pun intended)
@pravusnex
@pravusnex 3 роки тому
Tim you have outdone yourself. I have been following Starship development quite closely and I learned a ton from your video anyway. Thank you so much for all the hard work. Everyone should take time to give your video a thumbs up. One small edit though. The hover slam landing will never, never be boring. Just like watching a jet liner land is never boring. It is always an awe-inspiring feat of engineering.
@spadrevideo
@spadrevideo 3 роки тому
Wow Tim, I finally got a chance to sit down and watch this! Not that I need to get any more excited about Starship lol but I'm definitely next level stoked now !! I'm so honored to be a part of your team, and I love getting to share with the world what I get to see every day. I think you are about to have the craziest experience of your life too!!
@karanguyen7569
@karanguyen7569 3 роки тому
Hey Tim, I’m sure you’ve heard this from a lot of your viewers, but I just can’t express how great you are for making these beefy videos filled with information, and your delivery of these information is practically the reason why I continue to watch your content, because it really shows that you love what you do and that you love what you talk about, keep up the amazing content man.
@drinozhao7652
@drinozhao7652 3 роки тому
31:50 ... peter beck left the chat
@drinozhao7652
@drinozhao7652 3 роки тому
Wow Tim, I finally got a chance to sit down and watch this! Not that I need to get any more excited about Starship lol but I'm definitely next level stoked now !! I'm so honored to be a part of your team, and I love getting to share with the world what I get to see every day. I think you are about to have the craziest experience of your life too!!
@MarsChroniken
@MarsChroniken 3 роки тому
Best spent hour of my life! Thank you Tim!
@gerritgeitenbreier6551
@gerritgeitenbreier6551 3 роки тому
Thank you so much for this clear and informative comparison!
@AliothAncalagon
@AliothAncalagon 3 роки тому
Dude, you are literally in the process of writing the rocket bible.
@SuperSMT
@SuperSMT 3 роки тому
He should write a book, eventually
@MrAlRats
@MrAlRats 3 роки тому
@@SuperSMT What for? Videos are better than books. All books should be turned into videos like these (I love books though).
@e1123581321345589144
@e1123581321345589144 3 роки тому
They'll never be boring. The landings are the one reason I still watch most every starlink launch.
@cwifrbm926
@cwifrbm926 3 роки тому
Me Before: omg this is so long Me Now: WhY iS tHiS sO sHorT
@user_25th9p7
@user_25th9p7 3 роки тому
Ok what da heck is your name, did you fall on your keyboard?
@cecejuliu3097
@cecejuliu3097 3 роки тому
i will not like this tweet, because it has 69 likes ;)
@anandsuralkar2947
@anandsuralkar2947 3 роки тому
True
@anandsuralkar2947
@anandsuralkar2947 3 роки тому
@@user_25th9p7 looks like Fibonacci sequence to me
@wilboersma9441
@wilboersma9441 Рік тому
"It's hard to deploy parachutes when you are in a million flaming pieces." -Tim Dodd, bringing space down to Earth for everyday people. Seriously though you are doing some great things, you explain it very well, thank you!
@timhill7291
@timhill7291 3 роки тому
Fascinating video! Thanks for your excellent commentary!
@nathanwestwick815
@nathanwestwick815 3 роки тому
500 likes and no dislikes! This is one of the things I love about the spaceflight community!
@Scott_C
@Scott_C 3 роки тому
There are now 5 dislikes. Some people are just trolls.
@rikubackman2496
@rikubackman2496 3 роки тому
@@Scott_C yeah and also there are some bots that just dislike every single video they can/see.
@thecodewarrior7925
@thecodewarrior7925 3 роки тому
3.3k upvotes and 13 downvotes. That’s quite the ratio. Edit: reloaded the page and now it’s a 4.9k like to 24 dislike ratio.
@tintin27udec
@tintin27udec 3 роки тому
12 flat earther's dislikes
@TheSpaceEngineer
@TheSpaceEngineer 3 роки тому
5.8k likes, 30 dislikes all 30 dislikes are flat earthers and blue origin employees
@karora
@karora 3 роки тому
"Boring is good business" was something I learned many years ago, and I've never seen it contradicted.
@-danR
@-danR 3 роки тому
That will serve Jeff Bezos _very_ well then. Didn't hurt Bill Gates either.
@ironcito1101
@ironcito1101 3 роки тому
Especially for companies making tunnels and such.
@bt4168
@bt4168 3 роки тому
Rewatching this 2 months later and still it's the most helpful starship video I've seen.
@RandomPerson-zl6uz
@RandomPerson-zl6uz 3 роки тому
Yep apart from Elon is now going to catch super heavy instead
@bt4168
@bt4168 3 роки тому
Yes true, eagerly looking forward to it! Also SN9 in a few days hopefully haha
@N1gel
@N1gel 9 місяців тому
Thanks Tim. Your quality is superb. wai was good & possibly the best bi-daily update channel and he is getting even better. But your in depth deep-dives are a world treasure. You are explaining & recording the most detailed aspects of human space exploration, not just for us, but for evidencing what is daily becoming history to be taught to every future generation of humans. Your doing the future world a magnificent service. We are very proud of you and thats why you totally Deserve your seat on Dear Moon. Your Dear Moon commentary live will be riviting. Your Dear Moon video will be un-missable. Your Dear Moon Outtakes will likely be stretching our emotions to their limits. Well done.
@keithnance4209
@keithnance4209 2 роки тому
Excellent video Tim! Thank you for this education 🤙🏽
@Kabacisdead
@Kabacisdead 3 роки тому
Impressively enough, the SN8 belly flop was a lot smoother than in the simulation!
@hooptiej
@hooptiej 3 роки тому
it was both a successful flip, and a spectacular lithobrake
@paulround8501
@paulround8501 3 роки тому
The flip worked a treat and if the pressure hadn't been lost on the methane header tank it would probably have been 100% success.
@zakkhoyt
@zakkhoyt 3 роки тому
True, but the real test had almost no horizontal velocity. Future ones will though
@paulround8501
@paulround8501 3 роки тому
@@zakkhoyt Not necessarily, the translation to put it over the landing pad happened during the belly flop phase and it was already in the correct position falling vertically before the flip. It would only have horizontal velocity if it hadn't finished the translation when the flip happened and there is no reason for that to be the case. However there is no reason why the flip could not slightly over rotate to compensate for any residual horizontal velocity. I am sure we will see this in future tests as they start to push the limits of the landing manoeuvre.
@patrickdurham8393
@patrickdurham8393 3 роки тому
If the engines hadn't gone all self consuming I think it would have worked. Still better than what Musk thought we'd be see.
@Sudz3
@Sudz3 3 роки тому
*waits for Elon to tweet some change that makes this video obsolete within hours of release* (I say this affectionately. This video is awesome)
@Theiliteritesbian
@Theiliteritesbian 3 роки тому
This is the first time in a few years (when ever Nelly Tyson hosted da cosmos) that a true nerd has completely entertained me. Nice job pulling it off!
@hoylekiger2194
@hoylekiger2194 3 роки тому
Oh my! How the discussion of space has shifted since my days in high school Airforce ROTC, 1969.
@PRH123
@PRH123 3 роки тому
I’m actually intrigued by how similar it is overall to Von Brauns concepts, that I used to look at again and again in the 1969 World Book...
@baldhat2498
@baldhat2498 3 роки тому
Love how his subtitle is still "For everyday people" even though he is the one with the deepest, longest and most into detail videos
@dylen6151
@dylen6151 3 роки тому
I'm pretty sure long time viewers are now learning more than everyday people from watching these videos
@A.Lifecraft
@A.Lifecraft 3 роки тому
It's still made for everyday people. Never had to read up anything from back in my physics studies to understand whats going on here. Well maybe someone who wasn't so lucky in his education would have to google some things or look up wikipedia, but people will get around. There are other youtubers who do shorter more in-depth videos but you have to bring along some scientific knowledge there.
@limiv5272
@limiv5272 3 роки тому
I think the videos are long and detailed *because* they're made "for everyday people". He has to explain everything and give analogies that would make sense to people with no relevant education
@A.Lifecraft
@A.Lifecraft 3 роки тому
@@limiv5272 These are not just short infostrips inflated by explanations for dummies. As i said i once studied physics with the objective to maybe become an aerospace engineer. Tim still delivers numbers and infos that make sense and are relevant to me while everyday people might pass this as information not relevant to them. It's like a good family movie where you have the slapstick for the kids but also the more subtle jokes for parents.
@limiv5272
@limiv5272 3 роки тому
@@A.Lifecraft You're saying exactly what I am, but somehow claiming we're saying something different
@andro3131
@andro3131 3 роки тому
I watched the whole thing immediately. At the end I felt like only 10min have passed. Thumbs up, that was really great stuff !!!
@davidharness1507
@davidharness1507 3 роки тому
That has been the best thing about this. We can tune in!!
@directedby100
@directedby100 3 роки тому
Great summary, Tim. I actually found most interesting the multiple currently planned and potential Starship types coming ... Crew, Tanker, Cargo, Lunar, Deep Space, Earth Transport, Atmospheric Sanitation, ISS Starship Shuttle, Four Seasons Sheraton Starship Taxi, etc etc.
@shawndouglass2939
@shawndouglass2939 3 роки тому
😜😜😀😀😀😁😃🙌🙌
@funkengruven7773
@funkengruven7773 3 роки тому
A whole hour and never lost interest...now that's a new milestone! The craziest thing is going to be the belly flop maneuver. I don't see how they can even simulate getting it right, much less nailing it on the first try. I expect we'll see some crazy "Wile E. Coyote" style explosions and folks will call it the "ACME ROCKET" for a while, but just like Falcon 9 we'll all be watching with mouths hanging open in disbelief while it does exactly that over and over again. Watching the Falcon 9 still feels like a little miracle each time it lands. I hope they nail it right out of the gate, but that is optimistic to the extreme. I'm just happy Space X is bringing us along for the ride and doesn't hide their light under a bushel like Blue Origin does.
@devindykstra
@devindykstra 3 роки тому
I really appreciate the dark theme graphics, thank you for sparing my eyes!
@video_head
@video_head 3 роки тому
Really appreciated how technical this video was!
@davis302
@davis302 3 роки тому
Really high quality stuff...nice job man
@halpaiderta1496
@halpaiderta1496 3 роки тому
"I want the quality to be the best they possibly can be" Well, mission achieved. This was superb. Love your work.
@abbiemarshall7996
@abbiemarshall7996 3 роки тому
"I want the quality to be the best they possibly can be" Well, mission achieved. This was superb. Love your work.
@arturoeugster7228
@arturoeugster7228 2 роки тому
-24:49 spinning cloud like object? -24:52 another
@paulpantea9521
@paulpantea9521 3 роки тому
Every new EA documentary is like an early Christmas. Keep up the great work!
@gasdive
@gasdive 3 роки тому
Way better than Christmas
@danielseguin913
@danielseguin913 3 роки тому
Another marterpiece documentary. Well done. Good research, good animations, good quality. Thanks for sharing.
@frozenprakash
@frozenprakash 2 роки тому
Space channel with Metrics. I would ask nothing more nothing less, Keep the great work. Very inspiring to learn new things from your channel on every video !
@cpthornman
@cpthornman 3 роки тому
As usual Tim knocks it out of the park. These rocket deep dives need to win some kind of awards. This is top level stuff.
@Ifan-oq3nf
@Ifan-oq3nf 3 роки тому
When the conclusion came, I was like: Awww man its already almost over. It was such a great video with so much information. The wait truly paid off in my opinion!
@rpmfoto
@rpmfoto 3 роки тому
I don’t have time to keep up with all of this. You are my raptor that gets me up to speed. Thank you!
@kamaltaher7796
@kamaltaher7796 2 роки тому
Thank you man, brilliant video. Keep it up.
@bradhoward9165
@bradhoward9165 3 роки тому
Tim, this 1 hour video was impossible to turn off without watching in full. This is the video I needed to understand Starship, so thank you, thank you, thank you! This was so much information put in a way that was easily understood. This is the video I needed. Let's see this fly now.
@theglobalwarming6081
@theglobalwarming6081 3 роки тому
TIM! When you're recording Starship landing, please dont forget to put a wide-angle camera up; dont just record closeups. I want to see the the belly flip on the perspective of a stationary person
@EverydayAstronaut
@EverydayAstronaut 3 роки тому
We’ll have tons of cameras, don’t worry!!!
@harveykelley2571
@harveykelley2571 3 роки тому
Not only is this a great video, it’s exactly one hour. satisfied
@jeschinstad
@jeschinstad 3 роки тому
@@EverydayAstronaut: They don't have to be heavy. :> But there should be lots of planes and drones in the air capturing every single second, including VR cameras.
@josephdargy936
@josephdargy936 3 роки тому
@@jeschinstad That... that would be awesome.
@jeschinstad
@jeschinstad 3 роки тому
@@josephdargy936: Yes, unfortunately, people tend to not recognize history until after the fact.
@adoidpea4456
@adoidpea4456 3 роки тому
Your da man the internet science world needs more like you, great job explaining.
@robertmanrique1509
@robertmanrique1509 2 роки тому
...THANK YOU for a great and most informative hr..!
@dawintch4596
@dawintch4596 3 роки тому
Everyone else: build rocket inside factory SpaceX: build factory around rocket
@adamrezabek9469
@adamrezabek9469 3 роки тому
Tim: SX is building factory around rocket and not vice versa. Me:Why would you build factory inside rocket?
@johnkean6852
@johnkean6852 3 роки тому
Standard Fireworks has come a long way from a warehouse in a back yard to this
@coenzijlstra5145
@coenzijlstra5145 3 роки тому
Thanks for motivating me every time Tim, I was just struggling with studying all day but this one hour has given me motivation for weeks. I can't wait to finish my studies and start working for whatever thing space related. Thank you Tim I love you, I love your videos and I love your eyes. Keep up the incredible work of inspiring the next generation
@mallorymyers7525
@mallorymyers7525 2 роки тому
I was about to watch your Starbase tour and I'm so glad you redirected me here first.
@Seafariireland
@Seafariireland 3 роки тому
Super show, thank you for all the effort teacher!😁
@jacobhocevar8472
@jacobhocevar8472 3 роки тому
Dang, those animations and renders are insane! Excellent production as always.
@LuciaRose
@LuciaRose 3 роки тому
Exactly what we needed in such political time, spaceflight to unite us all under one atmosphere by reminding us of the planet we share (but still fight over) and the possibilities we have when working together. Thank you Tim!
@ImieNazwiskoOK
@ImieNazwiskoOK 3 роки тому
At the same time USA wants militarry satelites to literaly keep dominancie in space 😞
@hondatuner5156
@hondatuner5156 3 роки тому
Hello youtube algorithm👋 Hello Tim👋
@mobiuscoreindustries
@mobiuscoreindustries 3 роки тому
@@ImieNazwiskoOK Everyone want and has surveillance satelites, civilian satelites are already surveillance even when not designed to do so. And it has its advantages too. In itself it isn't too diffrent from ordinary aerial reconaissance but without all the air violation problems. Moreover, without these satelites, there is a ton of devastating phenomenons, hidden governement projects and blatant human right abuses that would have gone unoticed. I especially think of the CCP's muslim concentration camps, something that is so hidden within the country there is no way it would have been spotted otherwise. Plus, everything is a weapon in space. A civilian satelite is a kill vehicle by simply altering the orbit. This is why countries banned putting weapons in space, because it is a situation can do nothing but escalate. It is why when china decided to prove their anti-satelite capabilities by shooting a satelite on a stable orbit upset so many, because while unessesary, when the US did it, they at least did it on a satelite that was already on its way down, garanteeing that almost all the debris would be burned in short order. Meanwhile doing in on a stable, busy orbit created a lot of dangerous fragments that are going to remain there for decades. Not THAT much of a problem overall, but still an unessesary and poorly planned one, as often CCP projects are. Both tests were unessesary (and the US pushed it explicitly because it was going to be outlawed soon) but at least one was slightly planned. As for today, militaries understood the importance of having a comunication network independent from any foreign influence. That's why militaries are looking to establish parralel satelite networks that would be a lot harder to destroy. GPS is a big target, that the most unscrupulous of players would not hesitate to destroy, and there needs to be alternatives. Intel and information is what space is all about. Weapons? well everything and nothing is. China and Russia already have military satelites specifically designed for the purpose of taking out other satelites. These are more effective and more beligerant in their nature, but satelites of all kinds could be used as kill vehicle. When the entire orbit is a homing mine field, no one is going to be stupid enough to start the chain reaction. At least, most people would be...
@nickopedia5669
@nickopedia5669 3 роки тому
@@mobiuscoreindustries Starting the orbital mine field would be like the cold war with nuclear weapons. Mutually assured destruction - Not only would everyone lose their satellites, they would lose the ability to send up new ones for decades to come until the orbits deteriorated over a few years for the lower altitudes, to as much as 500 or a thousand years for some of the higher orbits. But even as the lower orbits started to clear up, you would have to worry about debris clouds from higher orbits coming down and possibly hitting one.
@enriquevargas2514
@enriquevargas2514 3 роки тому
such a great work!! Thank you Tim!
@lucasliam8238
@lucasliam8238 2 роки тому
This videos is so extremely well made that I feel like I need to make a comment just because you deserve to get one. Thank you so much
@unkn0wnd34th
@unkn0wnd34th 3 роки тому
Liking this before I watch it because I know how much effort you put into these videos and that in itself deserves a like! Keep up the good work Tim, and thank you. 👍
@Jimmy_Jones
@Jimmy_Jones 3 роки тому
Landings will never be boring. We will forever be looking for that perfect feed start to end. Along with the possibility that we get an explosion on landing.
@felreymiguel5734
@felreymiguel5734 3 роки тому
The most epic landing was when I jumped and landed perfectly :0
@vincentcleaver1925
@vincentcleaver1925 3 роки тому
Kinectic energy at the square of the velocity, moving through that much more atmosphere
@leodelpo
@leodelpo 2 роки тому
Hola Tim, tu programa es genial, gracias por compartir tus conocimientos y tu pasión por la tecnología aeroespacial. Este es sin duda el mejor programa que he visto en youtube. Muchas gracias!!
@MirorR3fl3ction
@MirorR3fl3ction 3 роки тому
11:54 this is one of the best diagrams/charts explaining chemical storage temperature, fantastic job Tim and crew! :D
@vaiuuii
@vaiuuii 3 роки тому
Starship Launch System.... SLS.... I actually had to pause to video, laugh my socks off, comment and only then click play one again. Epic Tim is epic!
@siddharthachowdarykoripell237
@siddharthachowdarykoripell237 Рік тому
This great, superb, amazing work dude
@MattH-wg7ou
@MattH-wg7ou 3 роки тому
I feel like I should owe you money for watching these dude! Such high quality documentaries. By far the best. Thanks man keep doing what youre doing!
Why does Starship belly flop?
45:47
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 1,6 млн
Why won’t Starship have an abort system? Should it?!
48:44
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 2,7 млн
ЗОРЯ - ШАХТАР.  Пряма трансляція. УПЛ. 10 тур
3:48:51
Как делали трек Меломан
00:44
Gazan
Переглядів 1,8 млн
Why SpaceX is Making Starlink
16:01
Real Engineering
Переглядів 7 млн
Why don't rocket engines melt? How engineers keep engines cool
26:31
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 3,5 млн
How SpaceX and Boeing will get Astronauts to the ISS
30:11
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 4 млн
Why Starting A Rocket Engine Is So Hard!
1:00:26
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 1,5 млн
SLS VS Starship: Why does SLS still exist?!
49:21
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 3,2 млн
How SpaceX Is Upgrading Raptor To Be The Ultimate Rocket Engine!
18:36
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 618 тис.
Can Starship Help Make The Artemis Program Better Than Apollo?
1:02:13
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 3,9 млн
Why do cylindrical rockets roll?
22:38
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 1,4 млн
The Entire Soviet Rocket Engine Family Tree
1:34:01
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 2,4 млн
What Went Wrong With Starship's Third Test Flight?
47:23
Fraser Cain
Переглядів 424 тис.
Почему iPhone ярче? #apple #iphone
0:46
Не шарю!
Переглядів 323 тис.
Продать одно приложение дважды
0:49
Real Emil
Переглядів 694 тис.
БИТВА ЗУМЕРОВ. iPhone 15 Pro / Samsung S23 Ultra / Realme 12 Pro Plus
13:58
Ох и ПАЛАС! Как я полетал на фанере с ONEPLUS 12R
15:04
i-shoppers обзоры
Переглядів 48 тис.
Зачем нужна эта кнопка?
0:25
Construct PC
Переглядів 113 тис.