Computational Conversations EP#1 | How do Al, machine learning and LLMs relate?

  Переглядів 827

Wolfram

Wolfram

День тому

Conrad Wolfram and Jon McLoone explore the relationship between AI, machine learning, LLMs and computation. What's new, what's hype and what's possible?

КОМЕНТАРІ: 8
@benjaminwilson6487
@benjaminwilson6487 17 днів тому
Very much enjoyed this!
@ianrobinson9802
@ianrobinson9802 18 днів тому
Good stuff. Looking forward to future episodes. Will the be a dedicated podcast RSS feed for Computational Conversations episodes?
@vonHolzwege
@vonHolzwege 18 днів тому
Interesting -- hope that there are more like this.
@NightmareCourtPictures
@NightmareCourtPictures 18 днів тому
never thought about AI being thought about like that. I do think that AI is just I (intelligence) but intelligence is itself always shifting and not grounded in any objective basis. If we do break it down into wolfram-esque ideas, then intelligence is at most just a system running rules and intelligence no longer holds any qualitative meaning for the purpose of making comparisons. So in this sense ya, he's right in that AI as a naming scheme is meaningless but its just a bit deeper than just shifting of intelligence gap. Machine Learning and LLM's are two such type of systems (programs) that follow rules to produce some output, and you could just consider them as intelligences themselves, under the above definition. What do you think?
@georgetsatas6022
@georgetsatas6022 18 днів тому
Whaaaaaaaaaaaat
@Dr.acai.jr.
@Dr.acai.jr. 11 днів тому
Sudomerge: rrr4:(r:0) +Minsky Her name is said thurnberry but is spelled like Daniel from ell. Check: Nader+goff+ellsberg:y !!-
@Dr.acai.jr.
@Dr.acai.jr. 11 днів тому
My octopus teacher. Consciousness ed. Link with octopus circuit. Find. Link with joules thief circuit. Find. See vi hart, Kantor and Hilbert for nested infinity memory array dimensioning primer. Bring forward integrating operations. Stop thinking of yourself as 1 and running out of numbers. The system is error-correcting in a way that amazes Neil degrasse Tyson. You possibly remember. Watch the Sagan version. Sorry to say it was much better than the stuff of Neil's I managed to illicitly acquire in the UK. Call the piss off lice. Hugh Everett can be verified accurate. Because he was accurate. We do not exist in a universe and your attempt to describe time function was something I thought I might never hear, condemned to the BBC's DReemer Brian Cox batting forever how blooming vast, vaaaast it all is I tellz ya. Discovering the features and how to use them of the system that can't say anything other than it makes life because it enjoys doing so ..... worth doing.
History of Science and Technology Q&A (May 1, 2024)
1:34:48
Wolfram
Переглядів 1 тис.
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 3,8 млн
Google’s AI Course for Beginners (in 10 minutes)!
9:18
Jeff Su
Переглядів 498 тис.
Stephen Wolfram on AI, Ethics, and Philosophy
34:23
The Agora Podcast with Byron Reese
Переглядів 1,4 тис.
QuSTEAM and Quantum Education
1:50:07
Wolfram
Переглядів 381
Nvidia's Breakthrough AI Chip Defies Physics (GTC Supercut)
19:43
Ticker Symbol: YOU
Переглядів 1,2 млн
The 7 Types of AI - And Why We Talk (Mostly) About 3 of Them
6:50
IBM Technology
Переглядів 195 тис.
Science & Technology Q&A for Kids (and others) [Part 144]
1:08:16
Wolfram Physics Project Launch
3:50:19
Wolfram
Переглядів 1,4 млн
What are Large Language Models (LLMs)?
5:30
Google for Developers
Переглядів 208 тис.
Спидран по кошмару... 91ч
0:25
Zalperovski
Переглядів 1,3 млн
Друг умный, подпишись на его тгк: ДАНЯ ГУСЬКОВ 😂
0:13