Exactly 😂

Yep😂

Hahhaa yes and frankly this game is much easier.

Yeah same as i think.. In full toss even if u through it directly theres only one thing can happen (air in swing or air out swing/ari up/down swing 🙃). What is actually a normal option for a bowler in cricket. is there any other else bowler can do in baseball?? I dont know actually baseball too much.. Also i have one more thought about baseball (if u want to hit a ball as how u want then why dont u take a perfect bat?? Baseball bat is so tiny, it has only 2 option, either ball will going for home run or it will goes in higher in air) lol 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ but in cricket batsman can play lots of nice tricky shoot without giving strong physical effort.. Thats the one of the nice thing..

@@naturebd6577 yes pitcher should throw away from the batter i.e. in cricket language must give room, a pretty easy ball in cricket.. this is a very easy sport

Don't even get me started on spin.

Bruh cricket is ruthless

hand-eye coordination is the thing that matters the most

all this is true, but there's more to baseball than you think outside of bounce, they got swing too. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/n6JhmX2uf4WcmoU.html

I think baseball players could handle stuff like that. They deal with change ups, curves and sliders with all sort of movement.

It's not like that baseball is difficult to hit home runs. U can hit the ball easily but home runs is different. Baseball players can play fast bowling but spin will be difficult

why you all indians don't stop spreading this lie

@@pmukundhan1163 no they can’t adjusting to playing shots on the bounce will be absolutely massive adjustment

facts; especially when it comes to spin bowling

@@dukewatts4410 do you enjoy being ignorant? ukposts.info/have/v-deo/eZlnaYubrZ95sIU.html

Baseball mey esehi hota hai

Most people know how to hold a bat doesn’t mean there any good

@@9shazad No, a cricket fan can definitely tell the difference

@@9shazad Almost all people who haven't watched or played cricket won't know how to hold the bat properly. These things are best understood when you play the game itself or at least watch someone do it

@@9shazad No, the bat for a cricket bat is pretty unintuitive. When people hold it their instinct is to line the front of their bat more or less square with the lines of their fingers and to grip tight with both hands. In actual fact to make decent contact you want the bat twisted around in your hand, and the grip on your bottom hand (right for most players) should very, very loose so that you can control the direction you hit it in. A lot of pros only use two or three fingers of their bottom hand. You can see the bloke in the Colorado shirt is gripping it like a vice with his right hand, and as a result all of his hard swings are shooting off to the left in the follow through, making it very, very hard to make good contact. Nobody who has ever had even 20 minutes of coaching would hold the bat like he does.

Any person who has ever held a golf club correctly knows how to hold a baseball bat. It is a function of positioning the hands correctly in relation to the grain structure of the bat.

Mate, everyone hates the curveball. Gone back to playing cricket and any delivery on the stumps to me feels like it’s a fat pitch down the middle. Fast bowlers coming onto the bat are so much easier!

@@flyingdutch9818 Except in cricket there are eno second chances, now batter can score it's of runs and that is the point. But in baseball only one hit is required at a time with multiple chances after getting strike. Cricket there are no strikes.

Same situation except I find it easier to hit in cricket. Weird how that works out sometimes

If you are a first-order batsman in cricket then baseball will be very easy for you.

Australian cricketers are the best....at sledging😂 greetings from cricket fan

Yeah not with baseball bat

Yeah but not from so close up, not when the bowler/pitcher is standing and chucking the ball, and especially when the bat is a round bat!

The sports are different, you dont have such a giant surface area to hit the ball and the ball moves a lot more in the air. So the "fulltoss" is not equivalent. Also, the balls are much faster on average from a closer distance.

Fulltoss above the waist aren’t allowed in cricket. Why is that? Is a fulltoss above the waist too scary for cricketers? And if fulltoss are so easy in cricket that proves baseball is harder because it isn’t easy in baseball. Remember we don’t get a surfboard to hit the ball

@@philmccracken179 and we did not get giant hand glove to catch a ball🤣

mate he took drugs

@@lennymcgrath9414 when?

Yes

In baseball, it's easier to defend than it is to score. In cricket, it is *far* easier to score than it is to defend. Baseball generally has three ways to get a batter/runner out. Cricket has at least seven. In order to understand both sports, you really have to watch it, pay attention, and have things explained to you along the way.

Both have their challenges, baseball it's always been difficult to score but now with guys throwing mid to high 90's minimum on average it's even more difficult than it was before in the past. It's definitely easier to defend unless you're facing a monster lineup and even then the pitcher still has the advantage 70% of the time. Cricket there's the bigger bat/paddle/club so easier to score but harder to defend. But as someone who used to play baseball yeah whether it's Baseball or Cricket, watching it and thinking "this is boring and easy" then try playing are entirely different stories. Both are arguably the most mentally challenging, focusing sports especially hitting a baseball you have like .2 seconds to react and commit then there's actually hitting it and hitting it fair lol.

@@MKF30 I mean when you say cricket has a bigger club, your opinion seems very devalued

@@RTG0 How about a larger piece of wood that work for you?? Is this a troll post or have you just never played either sport clearly or are you just one of those UK snobs? When you troll, your opinion is devalued.

So I assume "middled" means that the ball was hit correctly and what we would call "square it up"? This guy didn't in baseball terms. He "middled" the last one maybe and that was a cookie (meaning it was easy to hit). Y'all ain't touching a real pitcher trying to strike you out.

If the MLB players decided to change to cricket, yall wouldn't have a league because America would be the center of it all. It would literally take one year.

@@omariparker3769 Strange guy you.

@@omariparker3769 Lol they were bowling easy cricket balls as well, an American baseball player wouldn't be able to handle a spin ball, swinger, bouncer or any variation really... Americans really are too arrogant...

@@omariparker3769 Ok bro if you say so 😂😂😂, The pitcher just throws the ball straight at the batsman on baseball there's no variations except curveballs, no spin, no bouncers, no different pitches etc...

Not true

@@cricketexplained8526 yeah that's true buddy

@@cricketexplained8526 very true bro

@@cricketexplained8526 no cap

And who wrote the rules, where, and what year?

Hes a living legend

Yes and fastball pitchers or bowlers are not always the answer.I am very familiar with decades of cricket experience but in case you are not aware there are several pitchers from recent and bygone times that specialised knuckle ball and palm ball pitchers did exactly the same. Today's cricketers use knuckle balls that are exact copies gripwise. Warne's LB action was previously used by a great Mexican pitcher Fernendo Valenzuela who had a remarkable career with the Dodgers....look him up.

@@flamingfrancis Thanks for writing this much 🙌🏼 I will look him up for sure.

He was a spinner

@@flamingfrancis yeah, but it's not like Valuenzuela invented leg-spin or anything, or made Warnie what he was. But if Warnie said he did, then fine.

It's a game for people who can't play cricket and need a big glove to catch

@@marknewbold2583 oof

Cricket became a formal sport with fixed rules (or laws) earlier than baseball, or its predecessor rounders. This is because the British upper class popularized it. Rounders was and is still considered a lower class pass-time played in village grounds. The lower class settlers from Great Britain dominated America especially after the independence of USA. In their time, cricket was played in exclusive clubs, with costly equipment. Unlike in India, where people quickly started using cheap replacement bats and balls to play gully cricket, American settlers associated cricket with the upper class, and shifted their attention to a game they were already playing and were familiar with. They evolved rounders into a more serious sport, baseball. They replaced the poles in rounders with bases, made a longer bat, adopted a harder ball and brought the game to the masses. Rules were formalized by the companies which sponsored the games, with several versions still used, and these have evolved. So both sports are technically equally old, but formalization makes baseball younger.

@@rsvinekar The Laws of Cricket predate the Rules of Baseball by best part of two centuries. Then again those Laws (all six of them) were penned onto a silk handkerchief in a public house. The Official Rules of Baseball were adapted from the New York Knickerbocker Club in 1854. To take it to extremes there are depictions of humans hitting a "ball" with a stick in the Pyramids. So how was there a game of baseball played before the rules of the game existed?

@@flamingfrancis Nice of you to fill in the details. Thanks 👍

Bsseballs can swing more than cricket balls, and pitchers have to be precise as well.

@@cricketexplained8526 so which is difficult cricket or base ball

@@robb_lucci9872 The fact is that it is harder to hit a baseball into play if it is being delivered by an elite pitcher. But elite cricket works in a different way and has its own challenges.

@@robb_lucci9872 definitely cricket because there's so much going on, you need a higher skill set for everything involved, even the planning.

Batting is harder in baseball, and bowling (pitching) is harder in Cricket. Batting averages are much higher in cricket, you have a bigger bat, you can't strike out, you don't have to run if you hit it in play, there isn't foul territory, etc... As for Bowling (pitching), It's significantly harder to record an out in Cricket. If batting was as hard in Cricket as it was in Baseball test matches would take 45 minutes. People might disagree with this, but it's extremely obvious if you learn enough about both sport.

There is a USA women's cricket team. What I think a baseball player would find hard are (1) the bowling style (2) leg-spin (3) short balls at the head. They'd have the fielding down OK after some training.

Realistically, a team full of baseball outfielders should do well A good comparison would probably be a Australia or Netherlands Baseball vs Cricket match

You do realise that the USA Softball team have won just about every Olympic Gold Medal that has ever been on offer. Given their national standing they wouldn't be very interested in stuffing around with cricket especially when the USA have a National Cricket Association.

@@flamingfrancis On the other hand, the USA Softball team(the men's team) has not finished in the top 3 of the World Championship since 2000, where it was dominated by New Zealand until the last few years where other nations have gotten better

I'm not sure if I agree with you on baseball players struggling with fielding in cricket because there has been a number of American fielding coaches who are ex-baseball players coming over to the U.K., Australia and India to coach T20 teams in fielding. Clearly the people that run cricket teams see something in the way that baseball players are coached in fielding, and think that they have something to offer to cricket. FYI, I was a cricket fan before I got into baseball, so I'm trying to be objective with my assessment here.

Allan Border played baseball at local club level and said he got benefits out of it into his cricket. So that must count for something.

Very shallow. This video is absolute rubbish and proves absolutely nothing. The hitter would be made to look an genuine fool if he was facilng a good under 19 representative pitcher with a good breaking ball.

@@flamingfrancis all of these videos are rubbish

cricket batting is more accumulating runs while baseball you have to go hard, it's like winning the scoring title in basketball vs being the slam dunk/3 point champ

@@tytube3001 I play both sports and the fact you said that shows you have no say

...and that's rugby....

@@therealmrfishpaste nah...it's cricket and cricket only

@@FBIINDIA Rugby is also regarded as gentlemen's game but played by thugs.

@@jamesbond4810 but that's not same in cricket except few thugs of windies

@@FBIINDIA What do you mean Windies cricketers are thugs ? Do you even know what thug mean ? You are being racist here bro.

too bad he failed his doping test

@@powerfish1127 genuine concern or scorchers hater?

@@powerfish1127 yep the whole situation is strange

baseball is what happened when rounders and cricket had a baby. fixed your description for you!

As a cricket fan, I also hope for the same.

USA is hosting next T20 world cup in 2024 and cricket will return to the Olympic as well in 2028 Los Angeles Olympic.

ok and it takes multiple years to learn a single pitch in baseball. Some pitchers have worked on their curveball for 5+ years before using it in a game. These are not complexities unique to cricket, idk why you are all so pompous about cricket being more difficult.

@@chaboiearl4266 it will take more than a yr to even get a legal bowling action. It takes much more time to build pace and variations. I can just chuck a ball and it would be a legal pitch

@@controversybuttrue1331 Just because a terrible pitch is legal doesnt mean its a good pitch?? Like by that logic you could say football is extremely simple just because you need to kick a ball which doesnt take much practice?? Obviously not because there is a significant level of technique in every kick, just like in every pitch and every defensive play in both cricket and baseball. There is literally no point in acting like one is more difficult unless you just want to feel superior for no reason.

Jomboy is Mandred's daddy

It's the Ashes

Jomboy is the best commissioner baseball has ever had.

Dude 😂 your comment is being copied and pasted by the bots 😂

yeah my OCD is through the roof

Oof ikrrr! 😩

he's wearing the hundred league jersey. In that league, Bowler bowls either five or 10 consecutive balls. Different rule😅

@I do NOT see replies I mean, the same concept applies in cricket, and I'd argue that the bounce allows a bowler (pitcher) to do more with the ball and have more variations. For example, baseball has Curveballs while in cricket we call that Swing, but in cricket there is also Seam bowling, which is where the bowler gets the ball to bounce unevenly and jag left or right as it bounces. Seam can be bowled in the same delivery as Swing and at pace, and I'm not aware of any baseball counterpart. I'm not hating on baseball or anything, for one thing cricket bowlers are generally a little slower, plus the wider bat does help the batsman hit and (more importantly) aim their shots. Mostly I'm making a point that bowling / pitching strategies aren't unique to cricket / baseball, and you can bet that players of both sports have some pretty dastardly deliveries to give the batsman a bad time.

@@isaakvandaalen3899 A good pitcher in baseball will throw three or four pitches that look exactly the same 3/4 of the distance and then curve in different directions. The batter must guess which it is from very limited information. Example: You have a pitch coming towards you. Is it a 155km/h fastball that seems to rise, a 130km/h curveball in the dirt, a 145km/h 2-seam coming inside, or a 145km/h cutter running away from you? They all look the same until they're 5m from you. That's not to mention the lovely 120km/h knuckleball that no one--not the hitter, the pitcher, or the catcher--knows where it'll go. The pitchers/bowlers will do the best they can given the rules of their game, and the hitters/batsmen do the same. As you said, they're different, though similar, games with different rules and strategies.

Anybody can bowl in baseball.....but bowling in cricket needs several years of practice....😅😅😅

​@@rajdeepsharma9005baseball mey bowler ko pitcher bolte hai Aut bowling ko pitching bolte hai

Nice, now trying hitting it with a baseball bat

I don't know the speed of pitches in cricket. 70mph is 12 year old baseball speeds. Good high school pitchers are hitting 90+. But mixthat in with multiple different pitches ( curve, change up and the real equalizer the slider) it is difficult. If I heard correctly in video the elite bowlers throw around 95? What is distance between bowler and hitter? Baseball is 60ft 6inches. Elite baseball pitchers hit 100+ fairly regularly. Would be interesting to get elites of both sports to see how close or far off the completely different sports are. And the difference in skills needed to compete at a professional level. Not elite level but see if any players from each sport could compete.

@@ThomasLeonard-rd9hf I believe cricket bowlers are closer to the batsman, though not by a lot. Also, while it's true cricket bowlers are slower due to not being allowed to bend their elbow, I think most baseball players under-estimate just how much variance bouncing the ball can give. Still, I do think that as far as flat out skill is concerned, hitting a well-pitched baseball is tougher than a well-bowled cricket ball, simply due to the bat being round in baseball. Where the real difference in the sports comes from - in my opinion - is the fact that in cricket you need to be able to repeatedly face the bowlers for many dozens, if not hundreds, of deliveries in order to be effective. Baseball seems to be much more a game about getting one good read on your opponent, while cricket is more of a long-haul strategical game.

@@isaakvandaalen3899I’m pretty sure mlb pitchers are closer by a few feet I might be wrong though mlb is around 60 feet

I agree, I love cricket and during the lockdown I started watching baseball because the two sports are similar

@@valeriematongo and they both are crazy good,some things are brilliant about cricket and some things about baseball

@@akshitijgarg6467trueee e.g. the amazing catches in cricket and the amazing pitches in baseball

@@valeriematongo there are countless things of both sports,like drives and pulls in cricket, cricket ball swinging and spinning,how they kinda escape the fielder and reach bases in baseball,baseball catches by pitchers,bouncers in cricket,hits on a brilliant pitch in baseball(I kinda got into baseball a bit through UKposts videos, though I thoroughly love cricket )

@@valeriematongo and the funny thing is🤦🏻‍♂️😂people still want to humiliate the other sport just to show how their's better🤦🏻‍♂️😂

So there is no weather in America? Why do they have weather forecasts on TV then?

@@cricketexplained8526 Gosh, if the conditions are overcast the ball will swing prodigiously. If it's hot and the pitch bakes up , it starts to crack thereby assisting to ball to spin prodigiously. If it's a green pitch then it will seam as well as swing. Cricket is a different beast, altogether!

@@kirtigupta9753 It is, but you know that baseballs can swing more than cricket balls right? Obviously not.

@@cricketexplained8526 As someone who's played both sports I can confirm the unpredictability factor in cricket is so much higher then baseball

@@cricketexplained8526 If you're bending your arms out of proportions to throw a ball, you can swing anything, let alone a baseball.

Are you an australian

@@skumar-nm1dg From Holland, perhaps. Remember their team qualifying for the cricket world cup once.

@@jarjarbinks3193 holland played in the last t20 world cup

@@jarjarbinks3193 they recently beat South Africa one of gaints in cricket

Oh yeah because there is no emotions and excitement in baseball 🥴. Why are you guys such dickheads? Watch blue jays vs rangers the “unforgettable inning” and tell me that. Watch the whole 40 minutes tho not just highlights

I disagree but at least you gave your honest opinion and didn't make comments about baseball without properly understanding it.

Funny enough my gf from india thinks baseball is more exciting than cricket.

​@@taylorgang2237 watch ashes indvspak matches than say this

You are overlooking the fact that the winner of a baseball game is very frequently (indeed) decided by just one pitch or hit at the end of the game, whereas it's rare for that to happen in a cricket match.

In under two minutes of baseball being explained to you, you would be thoroughly confused and lost.

Okay also just mention which sport in which country

@@codeengineer10 cricket

some baseball pitches swing as much as, or more than, inswingers or outswingers ukposts.info/have/v-deo/n6JhmX2uf4WcmoU.html

play baseball and come back to me please

@@okkcomputer Would help him to go and stand behind the backnet for 15 minutes of pitching.

Baseball pitches are faster, thrown from a shorter distance and can move even more than a cricket pitch when it bounces. Just go look up MLB catchers view of a bullpen.

@@cricketexplained8526 baseball moves the ball much much more

Depends entirely on your position in baseball... 5-tool 2-way baseball players are some of the greatest skilled athletes on earth. For example, guys like Ichiro Suzuki and Rickey Henderson would have straight up BROKEN cricket if they were to ever to have been a partnership. It wouldn't have even been fair. Theyd be smashing sixers, and squeeking 2 or 3 runs out of absolute nothing-contact

@@Dingosean It would make a much better video than this, but sadly this is all we get.

@@Dingosean are you dumb? choose from these options , yes or yes

@@Dingosean literally a cricket bowler need more skills and talents

@@itzbashxll._6987 Then why has every cricket bowler who's tried his hand at baseball failed?

All those factors play into baseball aswell.

@@BnMProductions11 by condition of pitch we mean the condition of the playing surface, just to mention. It's the main difference between the two sports. Baseball has more pace and aerodynamic variation. Cricket has less aerodynamic variation but deviation off the playing surface. This is not intended as a slight on baseball.

@@BnMProductions11 I don't think the condition of pitch/wicket and bowlers finger apply. Welp, you wouldn't even know what those mean.

@@FS-me8mj I don't really understand the comment of bowler's finger here. There are pitchers in baseball who have had to remove themselves from availability because they broke an important fingernail that they use for their variations.

@@BnMProductions11 There is a big difference in terminologies between baseball and cricket, that can confuse such debates. The word "pitch" for instance. In baseball, that refers to the delivery of the ball. In cricket it refers to the ground on which the ball bounces. The softness, wetness, the amount of grit, sand etc. on the ground affect the bounce of the ball, a factor negligible in baseball. The word "strike" "ball", "defense" and "offense" have completely different and sometimes opposite meanings in both games. In cricket, a strike happens when a batsman "strikes" the ball. In baseball, it happens when batter misses and the ball "strikes" the imaginary strike zone. This is because the umpire has to call a strike in baseball using his judgement, the strike zone is not a real thing. In cricket, everyone can see the (very real) wickets being hit, so no call is needed. A "ball" is a valid delivery in cricket, while a "no-ball" is an invalid one which can give the batsman runs. "Ball" in baseball is a delivery which misses the strike zone and can help the batter earn a walk (after four of them), contributing to a run. In short, a "no-ball" in cricket is equivalent to "ball" in baseball. In cricket, the batsman "defends the wicket" and is called the defender especially in test cricket, while the bowling team is offense. Cricket batsmen stop the ball from hitting the wickets, and do not need to run on contact. In baseball, it is the other way round, the baseball batter tries to aggressively hit the ball and has to run on contact. The closest equivalent to a defensive stop from cricket is a bunt in baseball, but even there the batter has to run on contact. Baseball fans use words like offense and defense very often, while cricket fans rarely use these terms.

I can just imagine cricket players facing Jacob degrom or gerrit cole

​@@jbleaver28 i watch Jacob degrom pitching i don't think it's hard to play for a good batting player .. Some good batsman hit those ball but Shoaib akhter or Mitchel stark bouncers is like to you invite your death 😢

Even pro cricketers can't play that and you're expecting it from a baseball players. Funny,innit?

@@jbleaver28 they will be smahsed ngl.

​@jbleaver28 Lol hitting full toss is easy and this video shows it

Nah. Baseball is better and more popular than Criket. Hope it never becomes popular here in America.

@@Penaltypessighost How can you prove baseball is more popular than cricket?

​@@Penaltypessighost R u from Jupiter😅😅😅

Hi

@@abhisekchoudhary3108 Hi 👋🏽

@@8AlisaInez you are from which country

@@abhisekchoudhary3108 California U.S.A

@@8AlisaInez 😯😯😯

They do play bunt. Which is a defensive shot, tap the ball and make a dash for the second base.

No, they also play pulls, drags and bunts to get to base.

@@cricketexplained8526 that's still lower risk plays trying to score. In cricket batters are literally playing for survival. Not trying to score - just survive.

@@KingoftheHill63 that is not true. A cricketer who cannot score runs is useless. In short form cricket you are expected to score quickly. How do you think they score 150-200 runs off 120 balls?

@@cricketexplained8526 I didn't mean all the time. I was thinking about batters trying to survive until the break or night watchmen or stuff like that. Or even waiting for a bowler to get bowled out in short form. There's a thought process at all times between defense and offense.

Then why do baseball players get paid soooo much more?

​@@taylorgang2237 what,r you joking😂😂😂

@@scarlet33333n I’m not. If cricket was harder, and a top tier cricket player could dominate in baseball, they would do so because MLB players make more money.

@@taylorgang2237 i never seen a baseball bat in asia,oceania,r u kidding😂😂😂😂 if you can throw a cricket ball upto 140 kmh then you can earn a lot in 20 Leaugues around the world haha

@@scarlet33333n and yet they play it commonly in Japan and Korea, both of which are in Asia. My point is if cricket is crazy hard and baseball is much easier, a top tier cricket player would have gone to play in mlb for multiple times the money. But they can’t. The batters wouldn’t be able to hit a thing.

Football>>>> any other sport

Worst run franchise

They’re trying to represent every MLB team. Every show they have new jerseys

Rockies Rock!

Lol why are cricket scores 531953753-5311953754 then and baseball scores are like 4-2?

@@philmccracken179 We have 90 overs i.e 540 balls in a day in a test match, 50 overs i.e 300 balls per innings in a one day match. 20 overs i.e 120 balls in a T20 match. Secondly, cricket is a way more skillfull sport. A cricket batter would do way way way way better in baseball than the baseball batter will in a cricket match. The video proves it too. It's time america gets rid of this joker sport called as baseball and take cricket up.

@@nishantthakur3357then why do baseball players make multiple times more money? Why don’t cricket players go to the US and make 400 million usd playing the easier game?

@@taylorgang2237 MLB brings money coz of you guys watching them, MLB started on 1876 or something meanwhile IPL started during 2008 if league cricket had 200+ years to grow compared to MLB i'm pretty sure cricketers will be more rich

@@RandomLelouchFan I get what you’re saying but that’s not my point. If a top tier cricket player could dominate baseball because it’s easy they would come play to make the money. Cricket players vastly underestimate the bat difference and the fact that foul balls exist and there’s limited holes to hit a ball. Its wildly hard and the movement on pitches is way more

And a full toss is a gift to a baseball player, if thrown the same way as it is in cricket -- slow and perfectly waist high. You really think this is how "full tosses" are thrown in baseball? The baseball "full toss" is thrown at 100 MPH, with left, right, up and down movement on the ball while it's in the air. Then you have a curve ball, where the seams of the ball act with the air, making even top-level baseball players look silly, and I know cricket players will *not* be able to hit a curve ball without tons of practice, and may never be able to hit it.

@@paulmckenzie3181 cricket balls deviate even more because of the symmetric stching structure of a harder havier cricket ball, we call it swing bowling (google it) , there r lots of other variations, because the ball is allowed to hit the ground, (remember it can be on the full like baseball too.). Baseball is great too, I think baseball is pitchers game, where cricket is more of a batters game where lots of runs to be scored, where u can hit 360 round the park with a flat bat.

Baseball is a harder game but very different overall.

you would embarrass yourself playing baseball ya clown

@@taylorgang2237 Cricket is very complicated and harder. Ball just comes straight in baseball but in cricket it comes in many ways, such as spin, Yorker, googly, leg break off break. And cricket has many tough and complicated rules.

​@@taylorgang2237 it's a useless game

@@Mom_stealer_the_III baseballs can break in a bunch of different directions. A baseball is significantly harder to hit than a cricket ball. Baseball players get paid more money as well. If cricket was harder, guys would come make 40mil a year playing baseball.

😂😂🤣

Looked like 60

Same goes to both ways. Machines can bowl / pitch that fast.

Respect to all games but bro in term of speed a bouncy rock hard ball with speed 95MPH staight to head or body is way tougher to play than 90MPH full tossed ball(pitch)

In cricket some bowlers touch 100mph with the ball bouncing and moving....and all the pitches in baseball are the easiest ball in cricket..... Especially cricket's test match I think it's the hardest in all sports...playing fo 8 hours in a day and 5 days facing 80-90 mph .... and the bolwers can come back in the same match....the bats man can struggle against fire bolwers and can score runs against not so fired bowlers

there are over 15 different pitches in baseball you clown, and plenty of strategies regarding deception and tunneling, don't talk about something u dont know.

Lol👌

Not true dude. At any high level, baseball is seriously tough.

What are you implying? That it’s easy? Hitting a baseball off a professional pitcher is the harder thing to do in any sport, maybe besides controlling a puck effectively on skates in ice hockey

@@philmccracken179 it may be the hardest thing to do in bat and ball sports, but you're doing marathon, triathlon, MMA and F1 driving a bit of a disservice there.

Yessirrr

Baseball players have played cricket. It's just a question of level.

Considering the avg salary of a MLB player is much higher than a cricket player why hasnt one made it to the pro leagues? Heck the Japan, Korea, Mexican league pay is likely higher than the avg Cricket league why hasnt any Cricketer made the transition yet?

These guys have packed schedules. It’s much easier to get a star in the Donestic level

There’s a video of jos Buttler and Alex Hales hitting a few pitches

There is a video of Rohit Sharma throwing the first pitch in an MLB game. He made a fool out of himself on that one.

Might as well bring up Bauer to the mound to even the playing field. The guy and his media company would love that.

Baseballer facing Pat Cummins would be even better,

the baseball batter is gonna lose his toes haha

Laurie got 3 chances. Let's give the baseball batter 6 balls. 1 each from Starc, Shaheen, Bumrah, Rabada, Boult and Archer. I would be astonished if he scored even 3 runs....

Who is she? Shaheen

That was not a hr lmao

​@@mycricketingworld5328that would be too much. Lets just give them some okay once like part time fast bowlers. Even then they won't be able to play.

ignorant statement

Lol cricket is much more technical than Baseball.

True! 😄

Nice but try hitting a pitch with a baseball bat tho, not a cricket stick

That London pitcher was terrible

Any baseball player could easily hit a cricket bowl that had little to no movement going around 65-70mph. That was basically the pitch version of that which the English guy was dealing with.

What pitch would you throw on a 2-2 count at the bottom of the 9th inning with the scores level? 4-seam fastball, sinker, slider or 2 seam-fastball?

@@cricketexplained8526 cmon bud don't feed the troll

@@wce-cl4mu I am actually a cricket fan, just trying to show that baseball has it's own complexities that a cricket fan would not understand

@@cricketexplained8526 buddy my point is he's trolling.... don't sink to his level

@@wce-cl4mu right

Baseball is also very analytical and statistics-driven.

We do.

You hit “defensively” in baseball at times as well

Baseball plays blunts