Why do you admonish your viewers to be respectful but not the panelists. This video is full of outright lies about the other side and plenty of character attacks. The fact that you don't have an equal presentation of the other side makes Jubilee very suspicious.

Lol

LMAO "so what".. so even i know that if polar bears went extinct it would fuck up the entire ecosystem.. do these people have a middle school education?

@@para-yw9dn elementary school*

best ever if you had a middle school education you would know that if an animal that is dominant in the web were to disappear all that would happen is another animal would come and take its place because of the absence of its dominance. and in some cases you could even do without something like a polar bear

I like watching polar bears hunting seals off of ice floats . The seals eat way too many salmon .

Maybe because once someone makes up their mind about something, they will very rarely change it, regardless of any information. Cognitive bias makes fools of us all.

Exactly! Exactly exactly exactly exactly exactly

Bella Do you trust politicians for politics?

@@Jabree Not the same, my friend. We can argue political matters with politicians because we are or can become informed as to the effects of their policies, because we live directly under those effects and we are the experts of our own experiences. We can also become informed on climate science, but actual expertise has a much higher barrier to entry. You won't be able to learn as much as a climatologist did in their schooling and continues to learn in their job simply by googling, or by looking around you and saying that things look fine now.

Because most alarmists aren't scientists either. They were only talking about fossil fuels, but ignored nuclear energy, that's the safest and most reliable way for energy production when you ask scientists, but because of decades of misinformation by media uninformed people are afraid. The same alarmist who think the world as we know it is going to end soon and become a Mad Max World ignore that, because they are themselves uninformed about nuclear energy and believe the corrupt green eco-communist alarmists out there.

Hey, let's get rid of affordable energy so that poor people freeze to death.

Yeah I live in the city with horrible athsma and some days I the air quality is so bad that I won't be doing anything and just have an attack come out of nowhere

That is not correct, every time pollution came up they said reducing pollution is a good thing.

Co2 is not pollution, it greens the planet.

@@basketball9013 hey, let's get rid of corporate greed that is slowly killing all of us

Extremely telling

@@Daaanieeel123 that she is 60 +

She dunk the kool-aid and than some

this was so funny

Ecosystems naturally change and adapt over time

@@matthewbolton2246 over time. over many years. polar bears numbers are dropping dramatically.

The guy is a religious nutjob. Only humans matter to him. It is sad because the Bible does genuinely encourage conservationism and protection of the environment. These guys just choose to believe certain things from their own religion.

@@walmart2568 been saying that since the 70s but okay LMAO

@@ikninja1hd the bible also says the dinosaurs didnt exist, the earth is flat, and there is no such thing as space

I don't get that argument at all...the complexity of life on earth is miraculous really. It's taken billions of years to develop, and it's the only life we know of in the universe. We have absolutely no right to destroy it, and besides, we need it to live as much as any other species

🤣

Just pathetic

Go and live in the woods, then. Live in a totally natural environment. Also, make sure not to build a shelter for yourself, as even that is changing the environment. You people are such hypocrites... they ought to have all ran to Strong Agree. You're short-sighted, and don't think before you speak.

@@vanivanov9571 you can alter the environment in a way that minimizes impact. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

The accuracy of your comment makes me cri

thanks for the script format

LITERALLY ME

I do this with all these videos 😂😂

Most 'scientists' are corrupted, bought and paid for hacks funded by the global elites to push their destructive agenda! Sheeples such as yourself are too blind to see that, so I understand if your a little slow to get it. 😉

Connor Cameron What?

I legitimately can’t tell if your joking or not (if not no offence)

@@jimothyjimmz8372 sorry I'm just trolling a bit

Connor Cameron found the uneducated flat earthist in the comments

or the bible. as a catholic myself, we don't claim him

Just looking at him makes me feel annoyed

That one made me laugh

I LAUGHTED AT LOUD

My least favorite person besides the vegan guy

The logic in the room is non existent

Big brain time

Human arrogance - if the Earth gets ruined. The Earth went through some massive extinctions, naturally, before we ever existed.. The Earth went through Ice Ages...and Asteroid Impacts. Those examples are just off the top of my head and I'm not even trying here.. Life will always find a way and bounce back. It may not be a perfect vision of what you have in mind with what species might or might not survive, but it will go on with or without us. In other words, what The Earth will have going on will be perfect per say and it doesn't need you or any of us to have that vision.

@@Sparkk0 Yeah...do you know how many animal species we have extinguish in the last 100 years??? We can alter the envirormente way more of what you way think. Just create an genetic agent and bring to the extinction the bees, for example. You may not see the consequences of it now, but our childrens would. And that is the thing. Is NOW when we are starting to see some real effect of our actions in the planet. We cant destroy the Earth, not even with nuclear power but we can distroy ourselves by alterating the envirorment. Im quite sure that "small changes here and there" in the envirorment can have serious impact

You are constricting nature to me to just water, plants or animals. I think nature is bigger than that. Human beings philosophically can be considered nature and in that sense there's no obvious opposition between being humanist and loving nature. The thing is humanism is a term that is used in different ways by different people without defining in the intrinsic parameters behind it. Humanism at the source, in the 16th century was a movement that places "human beings and their qualities + values" at the center of everything. Literature, art... were a product of that and were sanctified. But the main question to me is what qualities and values are we talking about? Is critical thinking for instance, something promoted by Humanism in the later 16th, a core component of human beings, validating the existence of these pieces of opinion of these people? I do admit that his definition of humanism is extremely peculiar but it's his definition based on his set of values. In that sense he places humans at the center with his sets of values. He believes that the world would be better off with fossil fuels etc. these are sets of values from that past in which they believe and humans should be a part of. Personally, I disagree with him but it's his set of values.

they won't

@@maxbalk but if they did it would be bad

@@aarongonzalez4458 I would cry all night *no sarcasm*

@@wischrilliams8588 Why do you think so?

@@maxbalk Seen a few different articles that say the numbers are dropping and they're endangered. Also David Attenborough said they're being threatened by climate change and considering he's spent the last 60 years of his life documenting wildlife that's good enough evidence for me.

Where do you get this sense of moral responsibility for animals from?

@@leonardu6094 biodiversity conservation is important for our health wealth food security economic growth and poverty reduction

nazmi nazmi he wasn’t being ignorant at all, the original comment was a view in which we as humans have a purpose or responsibility to maintain all species alive. That’s what he personally thinks is right, and rights or wrongs are a question of morality, so the reply was regarding why he viewed it that way. I personally think all animals including humans are selfish, they have to be in order to survive, even when we help people and act with solidarity we do it because it makes us feel good about ourselves... im not saying that it is bad because i think its awesome when we all benefit and feel good, but regarding evolution and animals “coming and going” i don’t think it is our mission to protect every single species, i do believe though that it is our mission to build a nice and balanced world for everyone including those animals, if a certain species hurt us they can go, if human overpopulation is bad for the quality of life of future and present generations we must limit it, if the system is already balanced we must assure that we don’t hurt it etc... but not just protecting every animal without a reason when it comes to our quality of life. I hope you get what i mean, like a don’t think many people would be sad if mosquitoes went extinct lol, because they annoy us, transmits diseases and as far as i know are not essential to life in general, unlike bees for example.

Snoochies he only asked a question about were the morality of the original comment came from, the sentiment of protection. You are the one assuming things here and it only hurts us as a society to have people be that aggressive and sure about something they have no clue about. Morality is a personal sentiment, it messes with our emotions, passions, and actions, it has nothing to do with empirical science and facts, it had to do with what we believe is right or wrong and i personally believe that acting like you are is totally wrong. We totally can argue morality if you want because it isn’t restricted to each one obviously (our rules of society are based on morality as well), that was what he was trying to debate and understand

Isahaq Yusuf yes it definitely is, but he wasn’t implying that it didn’t matter. He only asked a question, and probably the both of you have similar opinions since you highlighted the importance of it from a humans survival and well being standpoint, which i understand and agree with, i just don’t believe it is our responsibility to protect every single species but to establish balance and maintain it, to have a good quality of life

Ikr! He wouldn’t be saying that if he lived in Australia...

@@ohmon As an Australian, the bushfires wouldn't have been such a disaster if the State government didn't fuck up their forest management (nothing to do with climate change)

@@Jamcad01 As an Australian, I would disagree

As another Australian, although bushfires have been worse than usual, in Australia it is common for bushfires to occur as it is a process that helps burn up all the dead foliage to clean up ready for the new shoots to emerge. New flora can pop up only a couple of days after a massive bushfire

The bushfires in Australia were a combination of things, with climate change underpinning most elements, such as a an inability to burn off due to extreme weather

lmao

LMFAOO FR

@Herbert Meier im not so sure… Polar Bears disappear so what we have Grizzly bear, Sloth Bear, Giant Panda Bear A skin color of human beings disappear so what we have black people, white people… Thats how I get it i'm sorry but it is shocking to me to hear such things! thank god our new generation will change this mindset

@Herbert Meier Yes i do. So because we are not affected by them dying means we should not care? It is a human centred vision I don't share with you, bears have as much rights as we do to live on this planet. And maybe I don't know all species of bears, but that does not make it okay for us to ignore their disappearance, when we are the very cause of it...

Would you be okay if all the dinosaurs were back and living with us?

Arthur Lefèvre thats fine to think that, but most people prioritize human lives over animals because we consider them more valuable

xAFBx Moto What are you getting at here?

If only more people and especially politicians knew what the constitution said and respected it

Man i dont understand that why do people think that constitute is like a holy grail it is a flawed document thats why we have people to alter it from time to time

[Statement: I am well educated in this subject] Keith: "I am well educated about the constitution" Completely irrelevant in an global climate change perspective. Also "as it says in the bible..." , really?

I believe climate change is real but I would be considered a skeptic too. I just don't want people their jobs, companies, businesses, resources and properties to be taken away for it.

@@tibodeclercq2131 agreed but I do think that some specific and not very environmental friendly companies should be encouraged to evolve their product or whatever to be more eco friendly. So like either the production process or the materials that goes into the product. But that would probably cost a lot of money and coming from a country that does focus a lot on environmentalism, I think the government should play a bigger part in not just paying Co2 kvotes or whatever but reinventing certain products, like idk making all 1 use cups eco friendly instead of just wasting plenty of plastic

He's obviously not very educated on how that affects humans

A lot of people don't know about habitat fragmentation, food chains and what a loss of biodiversity means, it's scary how uninformed people can be and still be given the opportunity to discuss their viewpoints that are not backed up by empirical evidence.

He said we still have other bears, so maybe he thinks we can just throw a couple pandas out there and it'll all be fine...

carolyn greenway one of the most important predator in the Arctic would disappear which would literally destroy the Arctic ecosystem

Luo De Li Ge Si I say we throw him out there in the arctic

Alex Monreal and yet the chase for money is what prevents those things. Trees have value so people plant them. Fish have value so people farm them. Etc. etc. etc.

Abdirizak you’re right. We should never use wood. Too dangerous. It’s a good thing you don’t ever use wood.

Adam Gonzalez the dude didn’t say that though, proper discussion means staying on topic

That's a good quote.

@@adamgonzalez7450 That's one of the biggest strawman I've ever heard.

both things are true. solar and wind is great for places like australia and southwest US but not as efficient **YET** because cost of distributing the harvested energy is a gigantic barrier...

@@TheDriftingsmoke true, I agree

@@TheDriftingsmoke I don't know what her source was on the landmass thing, because we could power the entire Earths energy needs with a little patch in the Sahara taking up about the size of Germany. We don't because there is too much energy loss in the transport through cables over such distances. But the amount of landmass is fine.

But there is enough land for them to take Animals land and construct houses and exploit the ecosystems.

I watched a few of the videos on this channel and it feels like Americans people doesn’t know fossil fuels are not endless...

Hi

HE LEGIT SAYS "THERES OTHER BEARS!" WHILE SMILING AND LAUGHING TO THE THOUGHT OF POLAR BEARS GOING EXTINCT LMAO WHAT

Ozzy Bacchus basically he wants us to drown? If so we’ll can’t say I don’t blame him.

@@unicornmistress9414 IMO, the last question shows how much his mentality was...concerted and conform; he won't likely change by himself unless society change, in other words, he changes when society change. Although he could be the advocate for the ones who don't have the voice; still, he follows "the herd".

@DDAA Do u judge the value of every life based on what it gives u?! Selfish

Keith is the same guy who said that water bans preventing him from watering his lawn were "unconstitutional" and infringed on his human rights. The Dunning-Kruger effect is heavy this episode.

United States Constitution... America is a whole continent

because were talking about lot of contries trying to fukn CHANGE IT all the goddamn time

Cause America (even with its faults) is a prime example of a successful country.

@@Sorakovu North and South America are two separate continents silly billy. Murica Constitution 🤪

Funny, Americans have always thought this way, all through out their history. As if they are the only country in the world and everyone must bow to them .

Aibha Jennings Don’t think that’s how it works.

Edbotikx that’s like saying Walmart going out of business wouldn’t have a massive effect since lots of companies go out of business

Connor McClyman It is lol. Educate yourself. Just google it.

Faith white, Like my boy Edbotikx said “Species go extinct all the time but we still have food”.

I'm not as worried about polar bears as I am about krill. Krill are at risk of going extinct. All animals that live near the north and south pole need to eat krill or eat an animal that eats krill. They are literally the sole source of all fauna in those areas. So if krill goes away, penguins will go extinct, fish will go extinct, whales will go extinct, polar bears will go extinct, sea birds will go extinct. And suddenly we will have no life in the sea. The entire fishing industry will go extinct.

Malu corporations are humans who work together. Businesses are not buildings. Businesses are people. The biggest business of all is government. I wonder if the government is above using global warming scare tactics to gain power.

Generalizing every person that disagrees with your mainstream ideas doesn't make you cool, smoothbrain.

@@asmith7094 but the needs of your business or "people" don't trump the needs of an entire population, such a nonargument, 'i think we should subject millions to unbreathable air and a labyrinth of natural disaster because it means the folks at my place of work have a slightly easier time making money'

Anesu Mlambo thats not remotely the case or situation in 95% of businesses

you're 90% right. everyone who voted for fossil fuel advocates and climate change deniers are part of the problem

Not to mention climate change is impacting agriculture, the majority of developing nations heavily rely on agriculture. These people dont care about people.

Climate Catastrophe movement, or doomsday cultists, are anti-human. You aren't protecting future humans because you don't know the fundamentals required to keep humans alive qua human beings.

The DDV Show its a very simple thing to understand that climate change will and has ruined many lives. Rising sea levels deeming thousands homeless is one thing, but there are many side affects which aren’t looked at, such as the affect it will have on politics when food shortages and refugees increase in numbers. Along with the amount of non-renewable fossil fuels rapidly running out, it is very possible that there will be many more wars to come.

The DDV Show the fundamentals required to keep humans alive are clean oxygen, clean water and clean food. If you don't know that then you have no part in this discussion.

@@tilzo_9752 Do you think that the world would prosper if we completely cut the use of fossil fuels? How do you think we'd fare if you suddenly cut the global energy and polymer production by over 80%? Being a climate nut, whether it be pro-climate change or anti-climate change, will never lead you anywhere. A good first step in the foreseeable future would be to cut down on consumerist culture. Where do you think the Zirconium or the Gold or the countless other natural resources that are used in making your iphone come from? Or what about the 715 gallons of water that go into making your Gucci shirt? Abolishing the use of the largest source of energy and polymer production would cause deaths on a catastrophic scale, cutting down on consumerist tendencies, would not. So a better start to "protesting" climate change is not to go out in front of the US capitol and complain about big energy companies (not to mention the protests themselves create pollution), but to not buy useless things on Black Friday, to mitigate the mindless consumerist culture that plagues society.

Bus Jackson animals shouldn’t be food, but true lol

Lord Kaileez not only that, but as animals go extinct the environment will have to change and the food chain of course thus affecting us

That dude was a straight up douchebag the ENTIRE time.

And just the beauty of the world! Jesus! 🤦🏿‍♀️

Agreed. There is an entire discipline of study called ecology that seeks to know how things in an interconnected environment affect each other and what consequences may or may not occur.

Cons have always been the root of many problems: Great Depression, Great Recession, Opposition to Civil rights and women's enfranchisement, the current wealth gap that keeps trickling up, and last but not least climate change. We should not take cons seriously anymore. We are past civil discord.

they are skeptic

One of them, Alex Epstein, has a book called "The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels". You should read it, it show they are not ignorant, you are.

I legit had to click off of this video, I lost too many brain cells watching this

At first I thought you were just being mean, but I became more and more astonished with every sentence that came out of their mouths.

@@ExistenceUniversity we are ignorant for caring for all species on this planet and he isn’t ignorant for caring for 1 species. That’s somehow paradox, ain’t it?

@@vivalavivaldi yeah it is... but this is the problem of evolution. Evolution is selfish... there are a few human beings who can get over it, but the most people are selfish.

Lys M Polar bears are currently on record highs when it comes to their population size. Their population has actually grown in the last decade, that is why you dont see the propgandists talking about them anymore...

@@wheatandtares9764 that doesn't even have anything to do with what that guy said. his lack of care is what shocked this person, not the current status of the species.

There is nothing wrong with this opinion. 99% of species that used to be around are now extinct and 150-200 get extinct every day. Personally, I find it sad when species die out, but if you don't care that's fine as well. Why does he have to care?

@@kairubynini Where did I write this had to do with what this guy said? Just wanted to debunk another lie that the Mainstream, fearmongers, politicians and "scientist" like bill nye the 1000 genders guy have been peddling. Now that population is exploding they never mention this issue anymore...

Wheat and Tares are you a scientist?

Yea. Idiots exist

And then wanted to say he’s cares about humans 🥴

But he LoVeS nAtUrE

tabitha Jones I don't think he's well educated

Logic.

Is there something for people who hate humans because i can categorize with that

Can you give one example of ANY other species that doesn't act selfishly or for it's own interests? Literally every species behaves in a way that best serves themselves, even those in symbiotic relationships. Why would expect the human animal to behave differently?

Bro you buggin. Of course humans are gonna classify humans as the most important. There’s not a problem with that. The problem is when they are ignorant to other entities

It's honestly disgusting.

the *false* belief that humans are the most important entity in the universe*

Same

I feel like he's the type of person who heard a bunch of misinformation about a topic, joined the wrong side of said topic as a result, but as soon as he hears arguments that disprove it, instead of just plugging his ears until the scary facts go away, he'll go "Huh, yeah on second thought your sides has better arguments, and more facts supporting it", and change his mind immediately

Appreciate him for what? Being ignorant? Nah dude I’m good. He was definitely the best person out of the group but blatantly disregarding obvious and well known facts is not something you appreciate someone for.

​@@kungenkingen4605 We don't appreciate him for his ignorance, we appreciate him for his open-mindedness. And to be fair, he doesn't seem like a complete skeptic. It seems more like he's confused about his position and was exposed to bad sources. Anybody who is willing to change their mind on a topic should be appreciated. What you're doing is basically the same thing as any political ideology, which is bashing someone who disagrees with you, which is wrong.

ngl i just appreciated his ability to be open and disagree with a group so dominated with strong views

Ghassen Ben Abdallah HAHAHAHAHA

🙌🏻This🙌🏻

No, he is open minded. Which most people are not when it comes to climate change views on both sides.

@@ghassenbenabdallah5899 It really depends on how they act about it. If someone is well informed but willing to see/understand other sides of a debate then that is the best.

One of three of the people there with an actual brain.

You people think the well-being of earth depends solely on a single species of bear living or dying

@@chrisj1306 okay but have you ever been affected by a natural disaster?

Chris J no but changes in climate effects species and the dying out of certain species e.g. the bees would effect ecosystems that we benefit from so from a strictly “humanist” perspective it is in our personal benefit to try and fix the climate

@@chrisj1306 Look into trophic cascades. The extinction of a top level predator can massively change an entire ecosystem. Obviously one species becoming extinct from an area won't change the entire planet, but populations of many top level predators and other keystone species in ecosystems all over the world are dwindling fast. With this can come mass destabilization of ecosystems. It's not alarmist, it's a real problem that's relevant to everyone.

@@chrisj1306 no but it's a dick move to bring another species to extinction.

Anthropocentrism is the belief that human beings are the most important entity in the universe. That’s what I think this comes down to

One day when the sun dies in several billion years time, the only hope any species have to survive is intelligent, technologically capable life, of which humanity is the only one showing up to the table.

turdrhinofiend have you heard of evolution?

@@turdrhinofiend no species will survive the sun dying, no matter how intelligent.

@@sigharmin948 unless you fly away in time there are probably aliens way smarter than us that have technology to escape the earth there is even a video of space people recording a weird space vessel getting energy from the sun or refueling it then it dashes away I incredibly fast but the video got leaked through a NASA live recording and later acted like nothing happened trying to hide it

I notice that about every climate change activist I meet as well

@@sithlord335 But....Climate Scientists believe in climate change. And we believe them, not random people who are in denial.

Just like you

@@basicbas4897 except I'm not claiming I'm an expert in the subject of climate change. Nice try though.

@Tairyoku Climate scientists believe that climate change is bad for the earth while these people just study the subject and devote their time to it they don’t have to be considered scientists they just have to know about what their talking about

Are you willing to change your mind? I didnt think so. You cant criticize people for things that you do as well unless you are a hypocrite.

@@theschneider9716 what???? Of course I am willing to. There's no such thing as absolute truth, so I'm always open to hear different opinions. It's cute how you tried to come for me tho hshdhsh

@@mojojose If theres no absolute truth whats the point of asking other peoples opinions, you are never trying to get to the truth anyway

@@UltraAar this is a philosophical discussion that I don't want to have in english, but we all base our opinions on beliefs (such as religion, science, etc) and personal experiences. What I look for is evidence and general consensus on a subject, so if your opinion resonates with me and you can support it with evidence I *will* take it into consideration and maybe I'll learn something I didn't know or get a new perspective. I will never claim to have the absolute truth, but that doesn't mean that I don't have opinions/values I strongly believe in

YES! Thank you...!

Mass school shootings and high demand for human trafficking begs to differ

@@tdub0315 What does this has to do with the environment though?! XD

He was like saying we live in the best world ever created. And young generations are living in the best possibilities ever. Yeah maybe only in his business and the part fo the Planet that has the money of this earth.

But just thinking of it, the younger generation will have to face so many more natural disasters due to climate change. It's really sad...

I think he means that problems in the world still occur, but compared to in the past the overall rate for tragedy has decreased.

I know I'm a year late but I was fumingggg when he said this!

Daphne Veldkamp same! Also not sure if it was intended by good pun!

@@fairylightsaldc4572 oh LOL, it wasn't intended but thankss 😅

Don’t forget the billions of animals

averyaveryp hello 👋 I’m an Australian and I would like to say you are 1000000000000000% right one of my friends parents work at a sheep harvesting company and his parents pay has been cut in halve due to the fires Also I don’t remember the number but around 1billion animals died didn’t they

That's not what he means. He "EVERY DISASTER" there is gets penned on climate change. It's quite convenient for the climate propagandists when every disaster can be "proof" of catastrophic climate change.

trenton9 you know this was the hottest summer we have had for a VERY long time and there is a bit of evidence proving the climate change was the cause for a good 3/4 of the fires

@@gabesnards5939 "The hottest summer in a VERY long time" really doesn't mean anything. All across modern recorded history, before this climate change hysteria broke out, all sorts of temperature records were being broken. I remember a few decades ago suffering through intense record breaking heat without AC long long before climate hysteria.....and long long before I or my parent's parents were born, temperature records were being broken. This idea that climate has ever been so stable that we shouldn't see these temperature changes is a falsehood. So to say that there's evidence that climate change caused 3/4 of the fires is such a vague claim. Climate plays a role in all sorts of things. The core misrepresentation is that man is the main culprit of such climate change and so much so, that the change in climate is world-ending. It's not. That's hysteria.

trenton9 still not right to diminish the severity of such a disaster all to try and suit your own opinion. It’s okay to not believe climate change caused it, I personally don’t either but to call it a little disaster is ridiculous.

Gunner, the “other bears” without the polar ones probably wouldn’t survive. That’s how one extinction can take down the ecosystem

You can honestly believe what ever. There's going to be people no matter what, try to fix it. I respect his decision that they don't matter.

It's hard to think of the future when we don't know what will happen in the future!!!!

@b.m who?!?!

@@AZWallbreaker right!

747lch omg I never thought of that yeah

Mental illness is NOT subjective to ignorance.

@@misty_oar this

He's the only one that seems like if you showed him a duck he would call it a duck. The other would call it a bird.

They’re going to die thinking they were right 😪

@@tdub0315 No ! If the humans go to destroy the planet like now or more,you will see we destroy the place where we live and that isn't nice if you live in a broke home that isn't nice and many people will die! I hope the politicans get the curve and save our Future ! But with Trump...I don't think so... And please inform yourself better! Maybe you will look the docu "our planet" at netflix or simple you believe the Scients (99%of them say that the climat change is true) and i think they are little bit smater then you?!

@@tdub0315 not really, cause you are gonna get to see the consequences of your ignorance

@@tdub0315 thank you

@@tdub0315 respectfully if we don’t attempt to stop climate change the world will end. We can’t sustain anything on our current path.

Madeline Kelly lmao

Actually, it's Dr. Seuss. Real person. Great movie highlighting the flaws in classical/market economics btw.

YESSS

7lets wouldn’t a sensible capitalist try to continue the resource that makes the money. We haven’t killed of wheat, cattle or cotton.

@@alexburds5720 how is that funny?

I mean little compared to the universe.

@@10parth10 That's literally the most nonsensical clarification I've heard.😒 People aren't "In the Universe" they're "On earth"

Parth Shah with that reasoning what’s the point in doing anything Cos we’re nothing compared to the whole universe

@@10parth10 haha everything is little compared to the universe - the universe is ever expanding.

Fires were started by people

Madisyn Grigull Just wanted to tell you you write really well

Dependent on our climate? Lmao, you realise you live in an air conditioned house that delivers water to you and stores food for months right? We are the oy animal that's not dependent on our environment. We can live in any part of the world just fine.

Pablo Santorcuato And where does that food and water come from? and how about that energy and the abilities to obtain that energy? oh, the environment

Thomas Dick Lmao where do we get that energy from? That water, the food... Everything we need comes from the earth, every single creature on this planet is 100% dependent on the environment.

@@thomasdick6797 Where does the water come from? Where does your food come from? Does it materialize instantly when you want it ? We are as dependant on our environment as any other being and you can see that in something as basic as our evolution.

well i believe in Climate Change but it's a natural thing, the ice caps have melted 100s of times, humans aren't doing it it's a combination of so much. like solar rays! the sun and the earth is changing it's tilt. a lot of information isn't true about it, notice how they changed it from global warming to climate change? it's because some parts of the world is going to become so much colder: i mean it snowed in the sahara desert last year and there it was a record low in alaska

@________ Implying that not believing in science and facts is a valid standpoint OMEGALUL

@@DecoyZ Believing or not believing in human influenced climate change in 2020 is like choosing to believe or not believe if the earth is flat. Bro, its a fact that the earth is round, your opinion doesnt matter at this point, just as 99% of scientists and thousands of papers online (which are free to read on the internet for the most part) are the evidence for what most people in the world already agree on since the last couple of decades

@@LeonardoTheMomo science says that climate is changing but climatologist don't agree on how the impact of humans is effecting climate, and they don't agree how disastrous the outcome of climate change will be So science goes from alarmists over to skeptic The issue with convincing people on the skeptic side who aren't scientifically lead is that history has kind of screwed the climate arguement, since I've been alive I've heard 3 different times the wart will end by (insert date) and yet were still here... so now it's become the boy who cried wolf, it doesn't matter if it's true that bridge has been burned by fear-mongering and misinformation

@@LeonardoTheMomo also that 99% stat has been proven to be worthless since only 20% of that 99 were actual climatologist, and I don't know about you but I don't see a brain surgeon about a wart on a toe, so why would I see a psychologist about the environmental impact of climate change

When this whole idea of "climate change" came up, it was actually predicting a global cooling (back in the 60s/70s). Then, when that didn't happen, they started calling it global warming. Then, when their predictions kept failing, they just changed it to climate change so they can still sound credible, even when their models keep on failing. Thus, using the new term, we all believe that the climate changes over time. However, the disagreement is if humans are directly responsible for it.

Basically everyone is mentally ill to some degree

😂😂😂😂

Love the Lorax

Come on, who’s with me????

😂😂😂😂😂

he’s a fossil fuel “activist” what would you expect lmao

I think a better version of this argument is that fossil fuels are to a certain degree necessary, such as during industrialization, and may be necessary to help third world countries to continue progress. (Incidentally, they tend to often be the greatest producers of fossil fuels.) I'm not a climate change denier by any means, but I also disagree with the rhetoric of shame. In many cases, certain fossil fuels are the only option, such as in flights and industrialization. I would prefer that we continue to develop clean methods of transportation and clean energy sources, but I understand why an outright ban would be impractical at this point in time.

At lest u will not be without electricity.

@@rachelhansen2417 I agree with you that for humanity it was a necessary step for industrialization (it still is for countries that are now in this step). And now that we have the means to switch over to cleaner energy, first world countries should give an example and move away from fossil fuels to clean energy.

Yes fosil fuels did a lot of "good" in the past and we a humans decided to use them because we did not know all there was to know about them. Bu now we have more knowledge and we should try to move away from them. Even if you dont believe it has an impact on the climat (global warming) nobody can deny it has an effect on the environment (air quality). And as cities keep on growing smog keeps on getting a bigger issue, using electric transportation would help that and in that way resolve a lot of health issues aswell as the climatechange (witch you might or might not believe in)

@@rikvanderbruggen988 Good statement

the same way someone calls themselves a scientist when they are not open to changing their mind with new information.

We won't either because it's not real

@@Roch10Family Bruh

HockeyPlayer So we’re just gonna ignore everything that shows otherwise? Children are being born with molecules that create plastic inside of them, because of all the pollution that’s in the ocean. Animals eat the plastic, and we end up eating them (through a chain or directly eating those animals).

@@brooke.t.g.r5646 what does that have to do with global warming

@@votedforsaken yes?

ARMY???❤️❤️ and i agree

And that's on hobi's Sprite.

We are going to survive another century. There was a study on climate change and the chances of us dying is VERY small. The most likely thing what is going to happen is that the temperature and the water level is going up a little in some places. The world is not going to die.

@@Thomas48484 that small change will cause an imigration and aggricultural crisis

Thomass hello it’s not going to go up a little? It’s going to go up a lot entire coastal cities will be sunken under water

liam shamir YES

That's really easy when you're poor

What that should really say is "of you prefer the environment over economy then you have no brain cells" if u cripple your economy trying to save the planet when the rest of the world does nothing *ahem* China then you become less competitive and are worse off

@WingsOfTruth Hunting wildlife actually decreases different animal populations over time which is the reason animals keep joining the endangerment list. Food doesn't come from wildlife. The environment is more important than the economy and investing in the envirenment creates jobs and benefits the economy. Hunting for sport should be illegal. The only things brainwashing me are facts. Not the media, not the internet but education and research with credible sources.

@WingsOfTruth I do know the importance of the economy, and I actually agree with you in reguards to how some people see the economy as some sort of abstract concept of greed and wealth and don't realize that the economy directly influences our quality of life. However, most of the people in this video were on the complete opposite end of the spectrum and believe that the environment doesn't matter and all that matters is the economy, whereas I believe there needs to be a balance between allowing economic growth as well as sustaining our environment, since without a stable environment we won't have the resources needed to sustain us.

@@cicidiaries7995 There has been studies that show as economies improve there is a correlational increase in environmentalism. Poor starving people don't tend to fixate on abstract threats coming in 10 years or some other time, they just want to eat, be warm, and take care of their kids. It seems most people here don't get that.

@@manniefresh3425 Oh interesting, I haven't heard of those studies before. Yeah I do agree though that our present economic concerns are usually the more pressing issue, but at the same time we can't just continue to ignore our environmental issues until they turn into a problem that's too big to ignore.

@@manniefresh3425 oh interesting, I hadn't heard of those studies before. I do agree though that usually the economy is the more pressing concern; however, we can't just continue to ignore our environmental issuss until they become a problem that's too big to ignore.

are you well informed on this topic?? just curious

@@savemeplease7955 are you

Lmao right his logic is so flawed wow

"I already killed one person, so if I killed 10 more so what?" Seriously though, this line of logic baffles me.

Bears live on ice not water. What school did Keith go to

Also, "a few islands are gonna get submerged, so what?" PEOPLE LIVE ON THOSE ISLANDS, KEITH

@@Orynae that's not even the big issue, that's the meme issue. The issue with the ice caps melting or destroying the Amazon rainforest is the vast amounts of carbon being released back into the air and then that will absorb more heat into the atmosphere which will damage the ozone. Flip a coin on which will be worse, the temperature killing us or the toxic air.

...You mean, the hypocrites of Jubilee didn't like an honest question with an honest answer, so they kept trying to twist the question until it was pointlessly emotional, to attempt to force discord?

They weren't rephrased. They were entirely different questions.

@@wixxed the first question is based on the assumption of "I have the will to want to stop the ice caps from melting", so what Jubliee did was take a step back and see whether they had that first step motivation, in order to answer the "we should stop" (because there can be a lot of different answers to that). Yes, they are different questions, but they have the same objective

there wasnt any hypocrisy.

Not really. The Earth will heal. We will die out. So we are essentially killing ourselves.

@@brycemonkey3867 that was created to make our brains think we cant live whitout it. but if those things have never crossed your way, you wouldnt see the need of it. it's a concept bigger than "arent you happy with having technology?"

More like 4th grade science tbh

he is proud of having no empathy....

And to think this joke is a teacher...

The well beating of earth does not hinge of this ONE species of bear, you idiots act like it does though.

@@chrisj1306 Nobody claimed that, But the extinction of a species can have an enourmous impact on the ecosystem. Also there are some people on this planet who have empathy and actually care about other beeings than themself.

Vio Venda Money is a helluva motivator i guess

around 200 species of animals go extinct per day. and only now you care because it’s an animal you know, and choose to blame it solely on climate change? millions of animals went extinct per day even before humans stepped foot on earth.

Not everyone has to care, if you care about other species so be it. But respect others opinions

@@MarkiplierOfficial ahah I love that you are assuming they don't care that animals are going extinct everyday. It's heartbreaking, and if polar bears were to go extinct that would be heartbreaking just as much so as all the other species. Stop assuming people's thoughts bud 😉

@@lawrance7340 Heartbreaking to you lol im sure there are others that won't and don't have to care, pretty sure the seals will have a party when it happens

It was compared to the last 10 years in california.

Exactly.

Yes!

Praise this girl, honestly there are a lot of people who hate her but that's just wrong even if you don't agree with her, hate her beliefs but don't hate her as a person

please tell me how

@@kayla4551 She hates us

but it's a natural phenomenon, throughout millions of years, our earth freezes and melts all the time, that's what the research shows. YES, polar icecaps ARE melting but not at an alarming rate.

@@savemeplease7955 Yes, the ice caps melt and refreeze, but not at the alarming rate that they are now

Martial Arts Nerd i thought this was a shot at these guys at first

This would be really good to hear.

Same! I’m 16 years old an autistic and I’ve been asking for this one for a while, hopefully they do it eventually!

I would like to see that to it would be interesting and it would be different then the mental health one

Dqmien same lol then I thought he was gonna say something along the lines of “I’m autistic don’t come for me” lol

Harris Zeboki but most legitimate and certified scientist believe in climate change, would be hard to find a denier

@@samisalsa5546 I specifically meant those scientist vs theses advocates, ignoring Karens who blindly follow Le Bible

@@Zeboki If you mean discussion search for "middle ground" There they have three sceptics and three who accept the news then they discuss.

Why does my name have such a bad repppp 😂😂

Except actual scientists don't agree that climate change and vaccination are hoaxes

Moo Moo HE’S WHITE 🤬🤬🤬🤬

The same can be said with Brazil. You are not a tribe living in the Amazon for thousands of years that wants to raise the Amazon down to build farms for the to have a better life. Are you going to go conquer the Brazil & force the people living there to take care the Amazon for you, while you do nothing? You are pretty clueless. Most poor people don't care about climate change, only wealthy privileged people do... insecure rich people feel guilty about their wealth & they use it as a status symbol of how kind & caring they are.

De Code What? Poor people are the first ones affected by climate change.

@@ohwow851 What are you on about? Poor people where? Climate change where? Be clear. Where I live, climate change regulation & new law hits the hardest the poor people. For e.g. in the EU, they want to ban cars that are 10 years older, who do you think buys cheap cars that are used for more than 10 years? Poor people, if the law keeps going like that... poor people cannot afford to have a car or a transport, which reduces the chance of getting a job or any flexibility in life/career. They also want to introduce over time to buy only electric cars but the issue with using law to force people to buy stuff, it would make the demand for the be unstoppable, it would spike the prices for electric cars so much that poor people would not afford environmental friendly products. Environmental products always leads to more expensive products, especially when the government does it. There are plenty of other examples. Over all, you are really ignorant if you are asking that question. Poor people struggle to live day to day & by some miracle they might save or do something for their children. Climate change hurts poor people when the snotty elite nobles virtue signal crappy laws that is a drop of water in a tub in their finances... while no consideration for the poor people.

De Code I think we agree. Poor people EVERYWHERE are the first to be affected by climate change in any form, was my point.

Idk seems kinda boring to me

Arthur too, he kinda seems like a nut

Is he? To me, he seems like those idiots but just less convinced...

Fr

i really like jeremy.. but i somehow agree with most of them anyway.. im def a skeptic.

Bry Halla learn how to be actually be patient

PiratesLuvRum He should’ve stayed at the “somewhat disagree” when they ask if they were informed in the subject. Did he even know what’s the food chain and what can happen if it breaks? Like c’mon I learned that in 9th grade.

the man doesn't care at least he was being honest, plenty other animals have gone , and no one gives a fuck anymore

Alex Nelson people give a fuck. But once their gone there’s not much else we can do. That’s why it’s a desperate situation to help the animals before it happens to them. Because once their gone what are we supposed to do.

Hi You How does polar bear's existence affect humanity?

@@francestod.tandocjr4092 it doesn't simple as that

Victr Silva nature is what gives you farms. How can u farm cows if there are no cows because there’s no more grass?

Theres not going to be humans even before that without fossil fuels. If there are, with the banning of fossil fuels, then humanity would be miserable. We would have regressed

Victr Silva FARMS ARE IN NATURE!!!

Sehar N higher c02 levels = more nature, you can literally find c02 generators inside certain hot houses so that the plants will grow faster.

Victr Silva a world without nature is not a world i want to live in

I just hate it when climate activists use the term 'greenhouse gas' as a talking point when the term 'green' is a benefit in the greenhouse. That a gas might be beneficial to plant growth and photosynthesis...

how can there be murders in the world, I have a very safe neighbourhood

I don't think they do have a brain...

arjun shawn diwaker see climate change is real, it’s 65 out in January!!!

@@Sparkk0 Greenhouse gas is a term defined as a gas that affects the absorbing of incoming radiation from the sun (e.g., carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone); hence, your following comment is irrelevant to the conversation. Additional note: greenhouses (which are essentially closed systems to the outside world) are climate controlled which make an ideal environment for growing plant life.

Is it coincidental that many climate skeptics are often conservatives, and conservatives are often strongly pro capitalism which is the cause of homelessness in the US?

@@prunesgrove7805 There are far more poor/homeless people in non-capitalist countries

Linus Hägglund pro capitalism isn’t the cause of homelessness lol it’s a lot more complicated than putting a blanket term over that

@@prunesgrove7805 There are more homeless people in Venezuela than in uS

@@prunesgrove7805 I'm curious to know how capitalism is the cause of homelessness?

Literally California and the Eastern States of Australia too

Actuallyyy... 😬 The city is really old and actually sinking like literally sinking due to the type of foundation used and how the city has grown since then, there's a video a yt that explains it fantastically well. According to Maldives idk. I'm not a skeptic just wanted to clarify that Venice is more of a City planning issue than a climate change one. Just spreading the wisdom, no need to hate 😁👍🏽

You used it wrong...

@@erick-gmz i live near venice, I know the city very well. Trust me that the main problem of Venice isn't her structure. I mean, the way Venice was constructed doesn't help at all, but the worst factor is the increasing level of the sea surface

@@jackdelu Venice is literally known for drastic sea changes... the first civilization there built houses on stilts, it's not uncommon for the cities to be flooding, it's been happening for a millennium!

Like what? How can you be so hypocritical!

SiLLy oPIniONS probably because he’s a psychopath. Hell, you see him switch from strongly disagree to strongly agree after hearing one person say one thing. He doesn’t know where he stands unless God and the white slave owners of the past tell him where he stands.

I had to pause the video and cringe.

@@Bobbyheebee Wtf.

@@Bobbyheebee I think he just walked to the wrong side...

I was prepared to cringe, and I did

Failed miserably. Stopped the video at 6:28.

@@Cocoleaf731 the polar bear hater made my fingers curl

Honestly

@@lynnhawkins952 you're a champ for making it that far 👑

Is his lube, is the only way he gets hard