Do we Need Nuclear Energy to Stop Climate Change?

  Переглядів 8,769,244

Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

3 роки тому

Get Merch designed with ❤ from kgs.link/shop-140
Join the Patreon Bird Army 🐧 kgs.link/patreon
▼▼ More infos and links are just a click away ▼▼
Sources & further reading:
sites.google.com/view/sources...
Do we need nuclear energy to stop climate change? More and more voices from science, environmental activists and the press have been saying so in recent years - but this comes as a shock to those who are fighting against nuclear energy and the problems that come with it. So who is right? Well - it is complicated.
OUR CHANNELS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
German Channel: kgs.link/youtubeDE
Spanish Channel: kgs.link/youtubeES
HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT US?
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
This is how we make our living and it would be a pleasure if you support us!
Get Merch designed with ❤ kgs.link/shop-140
Join the Patreon Bird Army 🐧 kgs.link/patreon
DISCUSSIONS & SOCIAL MEDIA
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Reddit: kgs.link/reddit
Instagram: kgs.link/instagram
Twitter: kgs.link/twitter
Facebook: kgs.link/facebook
Discord: kgs.link/discord
Newsletter: kgs.link/newsletter
OUR VOICE
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
The Kurzgesagt voice is from
Steve Taylor: kgs.link/youtube-voice
OUR MUSIC ♬♪
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
700+ minutes of Kurzgesagt Soundtracks by Epic Mountain:
Spotify: kgs.link/music-spotify
Soundcloud: kgs.link/music-soundcloud
Bandcamp: kgs.link/music-bandcamp
UKposts: kgs.link/music-youtube2021
Facebook: kgs.link/music-facebook
The Soundtrack of this video:
Soundcloud: bit.ly/3a4Jfi8
Bandcamp: bit.ly/2PNqPvr
🐦🐧🐤 PATREON BIRD ARMY 🐤🐧🐦
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Many Thanks to our wonderful Patreons who support us every month and made this video possible:
Harshul Banthia, Priyadarshi Siddharth, Ethan, Chad, Mason Lagos, Zinovia, BigOlive, Edgar Galan, Lance Liu, Super Luigi Bros Animations, Nicolas Eckert, Drashya Goel, Francois, Seanskios, Alessandro Ticozzi, Cameron McPhail, Ace Sparrow, Russell Stockhammer, o+o, Alec Hogben, Mikolaj Pawlikowski, Alexandra Cheung, SubSonixx, Guillaume VIDAL, Andy Highland, Arina Maria Neculai, Jeremy Engelberg, Josh Lavine, Azreal, Jeremy Clark, Jordi Malaret, Daniel Lo, Kenna Miller, Motin, rayV, Maximo Brito, bque23, Evhen Samchuk, Riyo, Giakeimas, Sunny Bär, Alexander Utz, Gaspard Medina-Creimer, James McClelland, David Nejedlý, George-Cristian Bîrzan, James Ilesley, JP, Ariel Tubbs, Anon, Felicity, Prashanth Samuel, Doop a Derp, Brettyoke49, Oksana Sivchenko, Rene Duedam, Kacey Armbruster, Yu Shing Cheng, osama bin laden's cousin's white best friend, Miko Boulerice, Skyler Martin, Matt Harlow, Arash Amini, Christopher Thomas, João Pinheiro, Raj Patel, Maurizio, panic, Raghav Mahajan, Mate Serdult, Ethan (cathethanoob), Warren Price, Laiton, Drew Johnson, Cole Reid, Daniel Mayor, Vincent Strüh, Gamerbot43, Jonathan Elbaz, matt yang, Nikita Ivanov, Lindsay, David, IsThisRealLife, Sam Wallick, alxpck, Aina Piera Tur, Darius Soo Lum, Happy 1 Year Will Smith

КОМЕНТАРІ: 26 000
@kurzgesagt
@kurzgesagt 3 роки тому
Head over to our shop to get exclusive kurzgesagt merch and sciency products designed with love. Getting something from the kurzgesagt shop is the best way to support us and to keep our videos free for everyone. ►► kgs.link/shop-140 (Worldwide Shipping Available)
@andrefarfan4372
@andrefarfan4372 3 роки тому
Hello
@himmerseld3701
@himmerseld3701 3 роки тому
Beans
@chieckenman4432
@chieckenman4432 3 роки тому
sus
@wzae___
@wzae___ 3 роки тому
Beans
@adityajain1378
@adityajain1378 3 роки тому
pigpie
@turbochicken80
@turbochicken80 2 роки тому
Nuclear energy is in a way like traveling by an airplane. It is very safe, but when something happens people freak out.
@aimilize3518
@aimilize3518 2 роки тому
Very well put
@mobiletaskforceepsilon1172
@mobiletaskforceepsilon1172 2 роки тому
Very true.
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk 2 роки тому
And nuclear, like airplanes, is safer than the rest.
@bartholomewdan
@bartholomewdan 2 роки тому
This is a great comparison. So many people are excessively scared of "what if?" scenarios, but the truth is that they're so well regulated and contained that they're far safer than anything else we have.
@cessnacitation-x
@cessnacitation-x 2 роки тому
The only accidents happened in like the 1970's and thats only because we didnt give a shit then
@richl4761
@richl4761 2 роки тому
I’ve never understood the abandonment of nuclear in progressive countries interested in reducing greenhouse gases.
@filipwolffs
@filipwolffs 2 роки тому
Nuclear energy was a legitimate threat to the fossil fuel industry so companies campaigned hard to make it look like the most horrible thing ever, taking advantage of the fact that the most common nuclear reactor designs produce materials that can be used to make nuclear weapons. Combine that with what happened at Chernobyl and it wasn't very difficult to convince the population that nuclear energy is too dangerous. Younger generations are more willing to give nuclear energy a chance, but the older generations which lived through the Cold War are still clinging to the idea that nuclear must be avoided at all costs.
@-p2349
@-p2349 Рік тому
@@filipwolffs I’m guessing the anti-nuclear propaganda started after chernyobl
@RoflcopterLamo
@RoflcopterLamo Рік тому
@@filipwolffs funny thing is this isn’t the only propaganda and lobbying. all sorts of companies of every sector which has caused a regression in the progression of humanity and all sorts of funny quirks like why Americas infrastructure is all car based and built around cars instead of people causing a nice twisted knife into its back from its dependence on such inefficient paradigms like suburban sprawl.
@cageybee7221
@cageybee7221 Рік тому
Stupidity. People look at objectively the safest, cleanest and most reliable form of energy and somehow convince themselves it is the opposite of those things. sometimes we just need to plow forward regardless of who is in the way, because the alternative is allowing tens of millions of people to die.
@-p2349
@-p2349 Рік тому
@@cageybee7221 nuclear waste is actually a good thing because while other energy sources pollute into the atmosphere (fossil fuel) or Solar the supposedly “clean energy source” which generates thousands of tons of waste that’s just shipped to Africa because it’s to expensive to recycle and then there’s nuclear which can easily be contained in hyper protected barrels
@TunaBear64
@TunaBear64 2 роки тому
"BuT nuClEaR cReATes ToXIc wASte" Well is true, but I prefer a few tonnes of toxic waste underground rather than millions of tonnes of toxic waste on the atmosphere.
@pelicant6497
@pelicant6497 2 роки тому
And now we can use that waste! What a waste.
@kingseekerbackup3085
@kingseekerbackup3085 Рік тому
THe thing about the nuclear is waste is a potential reusabilty, and the fact that theyre also solid makes it easier to control
@acethefiredragon8525
@acethefiredragon8525 Рік тому
Honestly, the toxic waste created from TikTok has far more devastating effect on people than the waste created from nuclear power plants.
@acethefiredragon8525
@acethefiredragon8525 Рік тому
@@cat.in.2020 Still not as dangerous as the byproducts that burning coal produces.
@AlldaylongRock
@AlldaylongRock Рік тому
Waste? Use fast reactors and all of it is either toxic as a heavy metal (Lead), or usable as a radiation source. Unprocessed SNF-HLW is a mess because it has a weird af decay schedule. Processed SNF-HLW is basically depleted uranium... Fuel for breeder reactors. Caesium-137, Cobalt-60,and Iodine-131 in MLW/LLW can be used as radiotherapy sources, as well as some other isotopes.
@oskartross730
@oskartross730 3 роки тому
Ahhh. Yes. The perfect homework distraction
@xanderwild1488
@xanderwild1488 3 роки тому
yes
@user-cv3dr4kt7j
@user-cv3dr4kt7j 3 роки тому
This is interesting as it appears to follow intended route of the mind when listening to duke saying this. Allow me to elaborate duke here is implied to have some kind of knowledge that we ourselves our withheld further implying that we don't ourselves know because of the phrase "but I won't tell you" This is an act often replicated by people in the 1st - 4th grade as they have had less experience and are more likely to tell lies about their knowledge. This is humorous because the final implication is that duke nukem is a child. Over all this comment is funny for explaining the joke just like the comment above which explains the joke to the audience who can almost certainly see fot themselves.
@haathi1065
@haathi1065 3 роки тому
Yeah.
@pyroblade888
@pyroblade888 3 роки тому
Ikr
@alinastanescu4430
@alinastanescu4430 3 роки тому
This is so reletable
@seriousnorbo3838
@seriousnorbo3838 3 роки тому
Can't wait for a movie about Capitan Nuclear, Wind Man, Super Solar and Water Woman fighting against evil Dr. Fossil Cloud.
@DarthPlaugas
@DarthPlaugas 3 роки тому
Simpsons did it
@martiddy
@martiddy 3 роки тому
Not gonna lie, I would watch that
@blank6949
@blank6949 3 роки тому
@@martiddy same
@Frog_Mario
@Frog_Mario 3 роки тому
That would be a good influence for kids to support renewable energy, like how the government influences kids to go into the military
@frontrowattheshitshow8849
@frontrowattheshitshow8849 3 роки тому
A better version of Captain Planet? I'M IN!
@patrolpilot3756
@patrolpilot3756 Рік тому
I was born and raised seven miles from a nuclear plant. We rarely list power and they did wonders for the community. i would love to see more of them.
@LineOfThy
@LineOfThy Рік тому
Dream life
@theorb519
@theorb519 Рік тому
@@LineOfThy before chernobyl
@LineOfThy
@LineOfThy Рік тому
@@theorb519 it still is
@theorb519
@theorb519 Рік тому
@@LineOfThy chernobyl
@LineOfThy
@LineOfThy Рік тому
@@theorb519 uh huh. and?
@raygunn13
@raygunn13 Рік тому
One could argue the biggest threat to the environment is radiophobia.
@SpartanJoe193
@SpartanJoe193 Рік тому
Indeed. Thw green budget should include nuclear.
@toddboyce3599
@toddboyce3599 Рік тому
Is that the fear of radiation? Which radiation? Solar radiation? Nuclear radiation? Ultra Violet radiation? All those other radiations I don't know about?
@franzicoy
@franzicoy Рік тому
@@toddboyce3599 nuclear radiation
@jghifiversveiws8729
@jghifiversveiws8729 11 місяців тому
Seems far more likely to be cost and time constraints.
@halwis
@halwis 3 місяці тому
No, the biggest threats are special interest groups and oil companies that are paying off politicians to have regulation and zoning laws changed to make it harder for nuclear and renewable to be built.
@slolilols
@slolilols 2 роки тому
Dude's voice so clear, the auto-generated captions are accurate
@c5h87
@c5h87 2 роки тому
5 stars would hear again
@nathnolt
@nathnolt 2 роки тому
Except their channel name
@sutoldude
@sutoldude 2 роки тому
@@nathnolt it says “cursed cargo”
@a4dtesseract408
@a4dtesseract408 2 роки тому
pretty sure they typed the captions
@sutoldude
@sutoldude 2 роки тому
@@a4dtesseract408 no
@alexroselle
@alexroselle 2 роки тому
"Should we give up nuclear immediately, and accept higher emissions?" *averts eye contact in German*
@klokoloko2114
@klokoloko2114 2 роки тому
What about Japan, they reduced their nuclear to 20%, Germany only 50%
@Benjiffy
@Benjiffy 2 роки тому
@@klokoloko2114 Japan's starting to put theirs back online 👍
@InformatrIIcks
@InformatrIIcks 2 роки тому
Don't stress, Germany is buying electricity from french nuclear reactor thanks to the european inter connected grid ... So Germany still kind of is a nuclear power 😂
@takkik282
@takkik282 2 роки тому
And in France Ecologists that grow in popularity want to shut down our nuclear centrals... perhaps there is other priorities right now. And batteries used for renewal energy isn't eco friendly.
@alfiepicton1339
@alfiepicton1339 2 роки тому
@@woodenfishes just so so stupid, and such a waste of relatively new power plants they won't even let them have there life time
@levitschetter5288
@levitschetter5288 Рік тому
The feeling when some of the world's biggest problems (climate change, world hunger) are caused by people not understanding science
@dr.snowman4883
@dr.snowman4883 Рік тому
What sucks is that despite being the smartest species on the planet we still have those living in ignorance either by choice or lack of schooling
@demoniack81
@demoniack81 Рік тому
The problem is that we have constructed this idea that everyone is entitled to an opinion on everything and that their opinion is just as valuable as that of the experts.
@Spinner891
@Spinner891 Рік тому
​@@demoniack81 The problem is that as soon as you make the opinions of the experts so valuable that the common man has no input, well, the position of the 'expert' becomes compromised. It becomes a position that people pursue (or PURCHASE) in order to gain power, rather than just to contribute to the world and society. Suddenly the 'experts' are a de facto dictatorship. The more centralized the power, the faster that power becomes corrupted. But even if power in society isn't centralized at first, it WILL become centralized, whether the general populace knows about it or not.
@mrtimmy5795
@mrtimmy5795 Рік тому
I know the perfect solution to this problem, make me a dictator
@ozanozenir2503
@ozanozenir2503 Рік тому
@@demoniack81 that is the problem with democracy.
@700007123
@700007123 Рік тому
Unbelievable how people are more afraid of nuclear power than walking across the street
@rpdlatk
@rpdlatk Рік тому
Well, some people are also more afraid of taking flight by airplane than walking on the street. Extremely low chance of accidents, but that one accident might be enormous, so they are more exaggerated than they should be.
@-YuaFukushima-
@-YuaFukushima- 10 місяців тому
@@rpdlatk like for instance chernoblyl it was big but they already made a housing around the reactor and i think imo if they have good maintenece(dono how to spel) it sould be good and have fail switches
@walterwhite415
@walterwhite415 10 місяців тому
The thing is, while walking across the street I have some sort of control about the situation and can watch for myself. Also a reactor meltdown causes much bigger problems for a lot more people. I live in the most dense populated area of europe and if this area became uninhabitable by a nuclear failure, there would be somewhere between 6 and 8 million people loosing their homes.
@chingirin
@chingirin 9 місяців тому
@@walterwhite415 well, wait till you find out how many people died because of fossil fuels consequences compared to nuclear accidents
@BigManTivO
@BigManTivO 3 роки тому
Kurzgesagt is easily one of the best channels on this platform: • complicated subjects are simplified • we get entertainment • never clickbaits • puts in effort and it’s amazing • amazing animations This channel will never disappoint me.
@DyslexicMitochondria
@DyslexicMitochondria 3 роки тому
This channeI is the pinacle of youtube. Without a doubt its simply the best
@trumpputinkim
@trumpputinkim 3 роки тому
@@DyslexicMitochondria Omg Hi I watch your videos. Love your channeI bro
@derstoffausdemderjoghurtis4346
@derstoffausdemderjoghurtis4346 3 роки тому
The best thing about them is that they DONT simplify. They compromise.
@remiaw
@remiaw 3 роки тому
Lately they've done some clickbaity titles, but surely it's for a good cause. Take as examples the 'nuclear deaths' video or the vaccines one.
@zenithchan1646
@zenithchan1646 3 роки тому
Yeah cuz they spended 100 hours every videos
@Bxrry
@Bxrry 3 роки тому
This guy could be my science teacher for 12 years and I wouldn’t complain
@edwardanimsyujinamuka6203
@edwardanimsyujinamuka6203 3 роки тому
Hell i wouldnt even get mad or sad if he scolded me
@thefork4416
@thefork4416 3 роки тому
18 years* Edit: Proud to be one of the first to reply to this comment. I will always have a space to edit my reply once again and anyone who clicks reply will see it. That’s a cool thing to think about.
@natespors380
@natespors380 3 роки тому
Same
@HondaAccord-zt9id
@HondaAccord-zt9id 3 роки тому
Double or nothing
@zachcrowe898
@zachcrowe898 3 роки тому
It's a team of people not one guy
@user-un2xd4yb4i
@user-un2xd4yb4i Рік тому
Top 10 times nuclear power plants are safer than coal power plants : 1. Now 2. Now 3. Yesterday
@voluntarism335
@voluntarism335 Рік тому
and 100% less pollution
@nicefloweytheoverseer7632
@nicefloweytheoverseer7632 Рік тому
Well, 99.999% less greenhouse gas (we mostly cant dispose that) And 100% more solid waste (which we can dispose)
@asheep7797
@asheep7797 Рік тому
Quick, shut down the reactors! They won't be safer than coal tomorrow!
@SpartanJoe193
@SpartanJoe193 Рік тому
@@asheep7797 Bruh.
@SpartanJoe193
@SpartanJoe193 Рік тому
@@nicefloweytheoverseer7632 What do ya think abt nuclear recycling?
@jdg7327
@jdg7327 Рік тому
How funny it is when everything attached to the word "nuclear" we get a freak out, yet the Sun is perfectly fine.
@Somespacestuff
@Somespacestuff Рік тому
To be fair the sun is not fission it’s fusion
@The_Oddon
@The_Oddon Рік тому
@@Somespacestuff I mean his point still stands it's still radiation
@markrobinowitz8473
@markrobinowitz8473 Рік тому
@@The_Oddon The sun does not create hundreds of radioactive isotopes and put them into the food chain. Radioactivity causes cancer and birth defects. Don't pee in the gene pool.
@-YuaFukushima-
@-YuaFukushima- 10 місяців тому
@@Somespacestuff and they are busy i think making fusion reactors or i just misread it
@lunaevalentine1020
@lunaevalentine1020 9 місяців тому
But the fucking sun is out there giving me a fucking sunburn 😤
@KOODJA
@KOODJA 2 роки тому
So educational, perfect !
@a-prevailbeats
@a-prevailbeats 2 роки тому
Your channel is amazing such a fan 😊
@Harithus
@Harithus 2 роки тому
@ADEN JOHN it is not his channel name is vidio unik and that is in indonesian in english it translates to unique videos
@Blazer-lv3xe
@Blazer-lv3xe 2 роки тому
Your mom
@R3in_Ch
@R3in_Ch 2 роки тому
@@Harithus self advertiser is what he trying to say.
@Harithus
@Harithus 2 роки тому
@@R3in_Ch oh thanks i read it wrong he was talking about tim berg that no longer exists
@graysonsmith7031
@graysonsmith7031 3 роки тому
I have a profound respect for Kurzgesagt. They put an enormous amount of time into research and animating their videos, try to make scientific topics as simple to understand as possible, and treat their viewers with a lot of respect. The Earth mug I bought from them hasn't had any paint come off even though I've been dishwashing it for a year, definitely not a cheap product. Of all the UKposts merch I've gotten, I think theirs is the highest quality (just barely beating out LTT). They could have just kept with patreon alone or gone with a cheaper producer, but they genuinely care. I'm happy that there are actually content producers who just want to educate the world and make the world better. As soon as I get a paycheck I am going to put a good amount of money into their patreon per month.
@DyslexicMitochondria
@DyslexicMitochondria 3 роки тому
They really put a ton of research in their content. They actually inspired me for my channeI.The information they produce is really accurate because they know that even the slight incorrection can lead to millions of people being misinformed. Wish I could be as good as them one day
@Listenimtooshyalright
@Listenimtooshyalright 3 роки тому
@@DyslexicMitochondria Clicked on ur channeI cuz I was curious. Brooo youre soo underrated
@marilynrivera7588
@marilynrivera7588 3 роки тому
*press f to pay reapect*
@mathiasandersen3762
@mathiasandersen3762 3 роки тому
I got the Challender this year and last year. both look amazing.
@rogueascendant6611
@rogueascendant6611 3 роки тому
We should invest more in space technology as it might be the only solution for finding alternative source of energy in the future. Space researched could help a lot in the prospects. There's already a nagging idea of propelling Helium-3 which could honestly a good replacement of fossil fuels. This energy resource could be found on the Moon. Another idea is getting unlimited energy from the Sun using satellite panels and could remotely send energy back to Earth. There was something that Nikolas Tesla proposed to get electricity as safe and cleaner but he died before his idea was struck on the next generations. Either way, mankind should really get their heads out of the ground and look for ways as not doing anything would turn out future into the stuff of nightmare for our future generations to experienced.
@jordanthomas4379
@jordanthomas4379 2 роки тому
The short answer is basically, yes, the only way we can reduce our carbon emissions is to either stop burning the fuel sources we already use, or use vastly more efficient energy dense fuel sources currently available, nuclear is by very far the best option, if you care about the planet, the climate and the human species, you need to support nuclear energy.
@lunny3715
@lunny3715 Рік тому
Let's just hope things like Chernobyl and Fukushima don't happen twice more often while doing this...
@-haclong2366
@-haclong2366 Рік тому
@@lunny3715 In the many years that nuclear energy has been a thing only those two exceptions are ever named. The Ukrainians actively wanted to develop nuclear weapons which is why Chernobyl failed, Japan is one of the worst places to place nuclear reactors but still only 1 person directly died from the Fukushima disaster. More people die daily from coal plants.
@lunny3715
@lunny3715 Рік тому
@@-haclong2366 Which is why nuclear reactors it it'self are very few in numbers across the world, there's only 440 across the world to be exact. Safety measures of local governments would not allow such hazards to be placed around local infrastructure. The problem is, accidents could happen, but the last we'd need is a nuclear accident happening in local cities.
@igorbednarski8048
@igorbednarski8048 Рік тому
@@lunny3715 nuclear energy is the safest energy source per TWh. That includes Chernobyl (and it also includes the 0 people that were killed by Fukushima disaster). Fossil fuels kill 5 million people a year. Chernobyl killed between 50 and 4,000. In other words - if we replace all coal and gas plants with nuclear it would be safer even if we had 1000 Chernobyls EVERY YEAR.
@lunny3715
@lunny3715 Рік тому
@@igorbednarski8048 A new age would mean new problems. And we can't forget about the socioeconomic issues that would come with.
@TheVoyager3301
@TheVoyager3301 Рік тому
Did anybody tell the Kurzgesagt team that making a channel this good and educational is impossible? I love this channel.
@NigerianCrusader
@NigerianCrusader 10 місяців тому
But the idea isn’t original, fallout invented nuclear enegry, do u know that awesome game called fallout: иеш Vegas?
@lilysantiago679
@lilysantiago679 9 місяців тому
The fossil record versus fossil fuels- Are they the same?
@CHIEF__
@CHIEF__ 3 роки тому
There was a fully functioning power plant in my hometown. Twenty years ago they decided not to open it because of evacuation concerns. We're still paying exorbitant electric prices as a result. Fear over innovation is one of the few things that genuinely infuriates me.
@LilliHerveau
@LilliHerveau 3 роки тому
same here. Fully functional power plant got 40y.o., and because of protests saying "end of life" it has been shut down. Absolutely speechless. For those unaware, picture this: would you throw you TV away because the warranty expired? No, of course not! Same thing, except that power plants keep up with regulations and are constantly being made safer, repaired and checked. So, it would be like having a TV, having a repairman over every 3months, after 2y he tells you it's in perfect condition but you still trash it because the warranty expired.
@Akronymus_
@Akronymus_ 3 роки тому
@chief Are you by chance from "Zwentendorf"?
@kevinvan4310
@kevinvan4310 3 роки тому
@@LilliHerveau And add on a billion dollar price tag. I talk to my parents about nuclear, and they're convinced that Nuclear isn't good because it's "not safe." Nuclear is literally the safest energy source currently.
@XxihewixX
@XxihewixX 3 роки тому
Think of how many extra fingers you could have had though.
@thekrampuselbananoquevivee9947
@thekrampuselbananoquevivee9947 3 роки тому
@@user-uw8si1zn2n who cares
@JC-sp6ov
@JC-sp6ov 2 роки тому
It annoys to me to think the only reason nuclear is getting removed in a lot of places is because of a scared and misinformed public which politicians then cater to for their own personal power.
@kingmidasxynopyt
@kingmidasxynopyt 2 роки тому
True.
@nauikunart
@nauikunart 2 роки тому
Indeed, This is currently happening here in the Philippines
@coreystinar7453
@coreystinar7453 2 роки тому
He mentioned loss of knowledge which is a big one. Seems like since the west stopped building reactors in the 80s we have forgotten how to do then. Construction of Vogtle in Georgia is a complete shit show
@BusBusII
@BusBusII 2 роки тому
Isn't your job as a politician to represent your voter base though? I mean I agree that nuclear is likely the way to go but i feel like that's how democracy works.
@Coffianto
@Coffianto 2 роки тому
100% facts
@blackcat4926
@blackcat4926 2 роки тому
These animations are SO GOOD! I love watching the videos, sharing them with my friends, and tracing the cute animals! Does anyone else trace them, or is it just me?
@Tsotha
@Tsotha Рік тому
This is a dispute I frankly don't know enough about to take a qualified standpoint on, at least until now, so thanks for making videos that explain the topic so concisely. I guess I should also watch your video about the worst nuclear accidents in human history. As usual I also think your videos are worth watching for the animation and aesthetics alone - extremely inventive and colourful with a great sense of humour. I appreciate these because I paint in my spare time, and I constantly get new ideas when watching them.
@tryctan2399
@tryctan2399 3 роки тому
This chanel is amazing. - we learn - we understand - we appreciate - we get entertained This is not youtube at this point. This is art. Thanks to the team behind the scenes and everyone that donate to this chanel to contribute to what we can see today.
@limenka.
@limenka. 3 роки тому
@@user-uj7zb7hw3x shut up
@antoniusdaivap7759
@antoniusdaivap7759 3 роки тому
@@user-uj7zb7hw3x you have to be famous to be the most hated
@aro4cinglife
@aro4cinglife 3 роки тому
the truest words I've ever heard
@yonathanjack1313
@yonathanjack1313 3 роки тому
True
@user-qj3jn3ed6v
@user-qj3jn3ed6v 3 роки тому
👄👅🧠💖💕💔💓❤💘💋💗💢💌❣💟💞💝💫💥👘🎒👜👚👝💄📿⛑👠
@Duarte_GB
@Duarte_GB 3 роки тому
Fun fact, the word nuclear was removed from the term magnetic ressonance (it used to be magnetic nuclear ressonance) because people were afraid of doing it due to the conection to "nuclear"
@the360mlgnoscoper
@the360mlgnoscoper 3 роки тому
so let's call nuclear energy magic energy instead :D
@zeroxz5114
@zeroxz5114 3 роки тому
@@the360mlgnoscoper that would be probably helpful xd
@simonilisei1311
@simonilisei1311 3 роки тому
Wtf
@sethapex9670
@sethapex9670 3 роки тому
In the characterization of molecules, we still call it nMRI.
@default322
@default322 3 роки тому
In US? Not in my country (non EN)
@mirog3166
@mirog3166 Рік тому
There are so many things that depict nuclear power plants as extremely dangerous, such as the series Chernobyl. But that stops people from realising how safe these power plants actually are
@scottmatheson3346
@scottmatheson3346 8 місяців тому
they're safe until subjected to the fullness of human depravity, that is to say, not safe.
@sockatoo_
@sockatoo_ Рік тому
i just wanna say i really love how you guys personified nuclear and renewable energy. like actual people, trying to fight the big smoke monster. never change :)
@cdemr
@cdemr 2 роки тому
Germany: - Let's replace Nuclear by Coal to fight climate change! _Something's wrong, I can feel it_
@egggge4752
@egggge4752 2 роки тому
The green party was the main proponent of shutting down nuclear energy. Ironic.
@NCXDKG
@NCXDKG 2 роки тому
let's use snow to cook hot dogs
@AndrewAce.
@AndrewAce. 2 роки тому
LMFAO
@puntersarepeopletoo6
@puntersarepeopletoo6 2 роки тому
Just a feeling I guess, like something is about to happen, but I don't know what it means.
@BnORailFan
@BnORailFan 2 роки тому
The main reason Germany is getting rid of their nuclear power is to not repeat Japan's Fukishima disaster. They announced getting rid of them about a month after that happened.
@DrummerMark20
@DrummerMark20 2 роки тому
Short answer: Yes. Long answer: Yes, we definitely do.
@satanofficial3902
@satanofficial3902 2 роки тому
No. You she entity lifeforces (including she entity lifeforces currently existing in XY DNA template bodies) come up with the strangest notions.
@brianjacobs2748
@brianjacobs2748 2 роки тому
Loooong answer: 0:03-9:03
@IOUaUsername
@IOUaUsername 2 роки тому
Hey look, the inverse of a TERF. I thought it was only theoretical.
@baitposter
@baitposter 2 роки тому
@Dana Durnford Try checking out the modern, more compact reactor designs that can't meltdown in big cataclysmic fashion, unlike the older plants of yesteryear that we mostly have employed
@zacharyelliott7161
@zacharyelliott7161 2 роки тому
Long Answer: Yes but not solely reliant on one source of energy.
@billygoat9381
@billygoat9381 Рік тому
I just did a paper about exactly this and researched from many peer-reviewed articles and books from the library. This is an excellent video.
@aaronvallejo8220
@aaronvallejo8220 7 місяців тому
I love the creative, educational and cartoonish style of your video. The electricification strategy is solid. Lovins, McDonough, Rifkin, Jacobson all have illustrated the practical vision we are increasingly building together. I am seeing renewables scale faster and faster...bigger and bigger every year. 300 MW of new wind is $420 million built in 2 years. A 50 MW solar PV farm is built in 1 year. In spring 2020, I remember the CEO of Vestas saying "the embodied energy pay back is now 3 months".
@givrally7634
@givrally7634 2 роки тому
Honestly, I may hate a lot of things about living in France, but damn am I proud of my country's choice of nuclear use.
@fisheggs_rule
@fisheggs_rule 2 роки тому
It works in France because France is connected by land to the whole of Eurasia and can flexibly transmit electricity in and out the country. It is still cool though:)
@Marcus-on6ni
@Marcus-on6ni 2 роки тому
We are proud of our country !🇫🇷🇫🇷
@Eldor503
@Eldor503 2 роки тому
Well they were not built for this purpose at all, but thanks to them we are indeed one of the cleanest country and people start to slowly realize it. Unfortunately there is our retarded """"ecologist"""" party, which spreads anti-scientific bullshit on nuclear energy. They weigh only 5%, but this is enough leverage for politicians who don't care about science or long term (so all of them, Hollande, Macron, Mélenchon...) to try and reduce the share of nuclear in our electrical mix in order to grab those 5%. Sad to see, although it's starting to very slowly move in the right direction (for example Mélenchon was heavily criticized when he told that he would close nuclear plants and invent some magical science-fiction energy to replace it).
@Dutchman-2002
@Dutchman-2002 2 роки тому
@@Eldor503 yep, green parties are usually the most stupid and un-nature friendly, and very political
@Dutchman-2002
@Dutchman-2002 2 роки тому
@Ej Dempsey nuclear weapons isnt nuclear energy
@cola98765
@cola98765 3 роки тому
0:17 "So, who's right?" Say the line Steve. "well... It's complicated" **whole room cheers**
@JohnDoe-ph7pz
@JohnDoe-ph7pz 3 роки тому
@@user-uj7zb7hw3x you got it
@user-qj3jn3ed6v
@user-qj3jn3ed6v 3 роки тому
👄💟👜
@stale.baguette
@stale.baguette 3 роки тому
@@user-uj7zb7hw3x just give u reports to yt
@doggobind
@doggobind 3 роки тому
@@user-uj7zb7hw3x stfu bot
@DarrensGeneralInfo
@DarrensGeneralInfo 3 роки тому
Hi there.. Please visit my channel if you love science and general knowledge
@cloudking2k
@cloudking2k 2 роки тому
This channel makes me want to try my hand at science and innovation to see what i could come up with. I would love to see Humanity take more steps towards a new future with much more to see and do.
@BlakeRBoles
@BlakeRBoles Рік тому
It’s going to take everyone.
@afriendlyfox
@afriendlyfox 11 місяців тому
Go ahead. All cool innovations were made by dudes who just got interested and wanted to try something.
@alsopatla
@alsopatla 4 місяці тому
Go ahead bro
@cattoleonce4066
@cattoleonce4066 2 роки тому
I hate how anything with the word "nuclear" will make people jump to conclusions even when nuclear energy is efficient and clean (if handled properly) and people against it. I can understand if you dont want nuclear plants in disaster prone areas, but i hate how people associate nuclear plants with pollution even when its the opposite
@adbogo
@adbogo 2 роки тому
It's obvious that you don't know what you are talking about. Fissionable material pollutes the world from the moment it is mined till the radioactivity of the waste has died down to safe levels. We're talking millions of years. Only in the short period of time when nuclear fuel is burned inside a reactor does it not pollute our environment.
@nathancrudup9603
@nathancrudup9603 Рік тому
I blame The Simpsons
@nicefloweytheoverseer7632
@nicefloweytheoverseer7632 Рік тому
I blame Chernobyl.
@adbogo
@adbogo Рік тому
It's definitely not the opposite. Nuclear fuel pollutes the world from start to finish, from the moment it is mined to the end of time when the waste is buried. There is no end to the pollution and it has been proved time and again. So I really do not understand what you are talking about?
@cattoleonce4066
@cattoleonce4066 Рік тому
@@adbogo and what does it do that pollutes the world so badly?
@augustus331
@augustus331 3 роки тому
This is exactly why I am so dissapointed, angered even, that the Green Parties, those who'd supposed to be the surest bet to combat climate change, disregard nuclear power altogether.
@john_john_john
@john_john_john 3 роки тому
It's populism and politics coming from a place of ignorance. It's the same thing with GMOs, for instance. People look at the words "genetic" or "nuclear" and understandably have their concerns, we can't reasonably expect the average person to be knowledgeable about advanced scientific topics. Politicians will either blindly pander to these concerns or have them themselves. The difference is that a politician should be knowledgeable about a topic if they are to give their opinion and vote on it, and always regard scientific evidence over their own premade opinions. And that's not even going into the subject of lobbies. It's unfortunate how leaders worldwide are so easily swayed and corrupted and it's no wonder people are feeling ever more sepparated from politics.
@ciarfah
@ciarfah 3 роки тому
@@john_john_john Or "radiation"
@jeffjests2764
@jeffjests2764 3 роки тому
@@ciarfah wait until they realize that their body is releasing radiation lmao
@Temp0raryName
@Temp0raryName 3 роки тому
Actually there are members of such organisations who are now advocating the use of nuclear, for precisely the reasons shown in this video. Including an ex-leader of one.
@howardbaxter2514
@howardbaxter2514 3 роки тому
@@jeffjests2764 wait until they realize that coal plants expose people to more radiation than nuclear power plants do, and that a banana will give you more radiation than a power plant will in a year. No joke, a nuclear power plant’s radiation release rate is about 0.9 bananas/year.
@nerovanguard846
@nerovanguard846 3 роки тому
That last bit where wind, hydro and solar energies fighting a CO2 Monster with nuclear being trapped was a genius metaphor
@michaelmoore7502
@michaelmoore7502 3 роки тому
@ĶévïņBB Přõďùçţìőñş you clearly haven't heard of MaximilianMus
@olegoleg258
@olegoleg258 3 роки тому
I'm sorry for asking, but can you clarify the metaphor please?
@magiricod
@magiricod 3 роки тому
It's funny though those other solutions are alot cheaper in my state we have a huge over budget over time nuclear plant idk why we don't switch to solar completely considering they have gotten so cheap
@charlesvo54
@charlesvo54 3 роки тому
@@olegoleg258 in the debate between renewables v fossil fuels, Nuclear energy is often left out of the debate due to the past fears of the technology, the metaphor shows that nuclear energy working in tandem with the other renewables, climate change would be pushed back by their combined effort.
@Aereto
@Aereto 3 роки тому
@@olegoleg258 A House divided cannot stand.
@jasperchu2165
@jasperchu2165 2 роки тому
In British Columbia, there is a ban on the use of nuclear energy for commercial power generation. It is somewhat understandable given that a lot of Canada’s nuclear power plants are around 40-50 years old, and restoring and refitting them would be incredibly expensive. In for instance, it’s a mistake to ban commercial nuclear energy if we have the regulatory capability to keep it operationally safe, accountable to the public, and as minimally invasive to the environment as possible. In BC and Canada, we should pursue research, investment, and development of next generation nuclear reactors if they are more modular and cost effective. It seems like the most obvious choice
@dean.coleman
@dean.coleman Рік тому
5:19 I can’t believe they put the detail of blocking the sunlight every time the windmill blade passed over it
@rudenet9937
@rudenet9937 2 роки тому
Note: Japan has shut down its nuclear plants since 2011 due to Fukushima disaster. Now they are reopening them and even plan to build new nuclear plants.
@AileTheAlien
@AileTheAlien 2 роки тому
Japan: progress towards sci-fi utopia America: ...regressing to dieselpunk
@tanimation7289
@tanimation7289 2 роки тому
How long will the new reactors take to build?
@alextherussian7366
@alextherussian7366 2 роки тому
@@tanimation7289 Knowing Japan, they will be able to build them in some 5 year periods
@alextherussian7366
@alextherussian7366 2 роки тому
@@AileTheAlien Well if the activists wouldn't scream wolf about nuklear meltdowns and tragedies in a country where there was only one case in wich no one died or got heavily injured, they might be able to build more nuklear. And no, renewable energy in a country wich has earthquakes, tornadoes and tsunamis with heavy spikes in temperature each year are not an good option. You need a backup plan, look at Texas this winter.
@alextherussian7366
@alextherussian7366 2 роки тому
@@zUJ7EjVD The Wind turbines also froze, making them unable to move. The Nuklear power plant was shut off for security reasons and online in unter one hour, wich can't be said for other power sources. And I agree that not all places in the US are subject to the same environmental threat, but you would still have to destroy a metric fuckton of land to make it usable for solar, had a lot of land disfigured by Wind Turbines and would threaten the living space of a lot of animals. Nevermind that an interconnected power grid within the US is a mammoth project wich will, again, destroy a lot of land and would take more years to finish then building Nuklear plants would. Nevermind that if one of these lines would get damaged, thud cutting the connection or leaking electricity, good luck finding that spot.
@garrettb845
@garrettb845 3 роки тому
It's unfortunate that many of these issues are bogged down by petty politics and political corruption
@ahmooonbaconwilliams3468
@ahmooonbaconwilliams3468 3 роки тому
Actually last year both political parties became pro nuclear
@asdefull
@asdefull 3 роки тому
many of these problems can be solved if renewables and nuclear produces a LOT of money and cheap
@Kabodanki
@Kabodanki 3 роки тому
isn't that true for everything out there ?
@VenomSnakee
@VenomSnakee 3 роки тому
Somebody has gotta be paid, and Somebody has gotta stop somebody from getting paid
@StormTrooperEX
@StormTrooperEX 3 роки тому
underrated comment
@beingablinkforever9818
@beingablinkforever9818 Рік тому
I have a profound respect for Kurzgesagt. They put an enormous amount of time into research and animating their videos, try to make scientific topics as simple to understand as possible, and treat their viewers with a lot of respect.
@wyattskinner697
@wyattskinner697 8 місяців тому
This channel is perfect to listen to while your doing stuff (I would know because I listen to this while playing video games)
@fall3718
@fall3718 2 роки тому
These animations are getting insanely good lately
@fgip358
@fgip358 2 роки тому
Ratioed the comment above
@jacobconnolly6595
@jacobconnolly6595 2 роки тому
they keep getting better!
@lemaroccan
@lemaroccan 2 роки тому
Exactly!
@BrianSantero
@BrianSantero 2 роки тому
They must have taken the Kurzgesagt animation lesson on Skillshare.
@thatotherandrew_
@thatotherandrew_ 2 роки тому
🔫Always has been
@mitsakos3151
@mitsakos3151 3 роки тому
This guy's voice will never get boring for me
@akish302
@akish302 3 роки тому
It’s the British accent
@MushroomMan64
@MushroomMan64 3 роки тому
Ikr
@awsumguy-bh9pz
@awsumguy-bh9pz 3 роки тому
ikr
@joshuagonzalez9361
@joshuagonzalez9361 3 роки тому
I swear
@123cityperson
@123cityperson 3 роки тому
same
@sunykamey4542
@sunykamey4542 Рік тому
The amount of detail in short, comprehendible way is impressive. e.g., talking about the animation, that game is recognizable.
@davidschaftenaar6530
@davidschaftenaar6530 Рік тому
I still love the fact that you made this video. Thank you so much. This helped and will _continue_ helping. Opposition to nuclear _is_ irrational in the face of climate change.
@clarkkent9080
@clarkkent9080 Рік тому
how rational is this?? How about the REALITY for the last 4 state of the art ADVANCED new nuclear projects in the U.S. over the last 20 years. Please don't base your knowledge on social media and YT videos when the truth is just a few clicks of the mouse and some reading. People today want to be spoon fed information instead of researching facts. The Southeastern U.S. is super pro-nuclear MAGA, has zero anti-nukes, and 100% political support. VC Summer (South Carolina) new nuclear units 2&3 were canceled in 2017 after spending $17 billion on the project (original estimate of $14 billion and 2016 completion date) with no clear end in sight for costs or schedule. Vogtle (Georgia) new nuclear units 3 &4 currently 110% over budget and schedule (currently over $30 billion) and still not operating. Mid way into the build, the utility stated that had they known about the many costly delays they would never have chosen nuclear. They are now delayed another year because according to the project management, thousands of build documents are missing. If you can’t build new nuclear in the MAGA super pro-nuclear southeast U.S. then where can you build it?
@scottmatheson3346
@scottmatheson3346 8 місяців тому
what's actually irrational is the refusal of nuclear advocates to be realistic about human irrationality.
@davidschaftenaar6530
@davidschaftenaar6530 5 місяців тому
@@scottmatheson3346 Do you want a localized disaster every few decades? Or would you like a major mass extinction bad enough to make the space rock that murked the dinos look like a pinprick? Yes, we're in the kind of situation where we have to make this choice. I choose option one.
@gavinjones898
@gavinjones898 3 роки тому
I am 99% sure that every Kurzgesagt video starts with “well, it’s complicated”
@bl4k4tt84
@bl4k4tt84 3 роки тому
Because they do this shits complicated af idk how these gods wrap their heads around it
@adolfofaulkner4684
@adolfofaulkner4684 3 роки тому
Well...it is complicated.
@eugenejamesbon4355
@eugenejamesbon4355 3 роки тому
true
@robd1062
@robd1062 3 роки тому
@Arun Kumaresan evdfttt try EF
@thetayz72
@thetayz72 3 роки тому
The real world is complicated. People have a bad habit of oversimplifying to suit their biases.
@bronwynpidgeon8481
@bronwynpidgeon8481 3 роки тому
As a scientist who studies this kind of thing, this is really well explained! I have a similar opinion to you, and many of the scientists in my lab do as well. If we are going to start to fix climate change for real, we need to use everything we have. On the actual facts, I might start using this video to teach my students, as It's really hard to explain this issue and this video does it really well!
@kl4pp3d_78
@kl4pp3d_78 3 роки тому
Please do so.
@dariusduesentrieb
@dariusduesentrieb 3 роки тому
Consider the following thought experiment: You have two technologies. Technology (A) costs 100 € for every MWh it produces. Technology (B) costs 150 € for every MWh produced. For every unit of technology you construct you can decide whether you use (A) or (B). Is there any scenario where you would use a mix of both technologies? EDIT: regarding lordcirth's comment: I assume that you agree with me, that anybody would choose technology (A). Now, you're rightfully said so, that if we add new constraints to these technologies we might decide differently. We have now two other technologies: A grid powered by Nuclear power, which costs today around 100 €/MWh* and the other one is a grid that is powered by wind, solar, power-to-gas, batteries and pump-storage, which will costs around 60 €/MWh by 2050**. Both technologies are similarly reliable, though nuclear has still the (very) small risk to cause significant harm. You can combine these technologies, but they don't complete each other. Would you rather choose technology (A) or technology (B)? * Lazard LCOE 2020 ** Bogdanov et al. "Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps"
@raynasomers6266
@raynasomers6266 3 роки тому
@@dariusduesentrieb if there is no advantage to B, why would u use it?
@lordcirth
@lordcirth 3 роки тому
@@dariusduesentrieb When A only produces MWh at random times, and B produces at a fixed rate for 30 years with a few days of downtime per decade?
@thinkamajig
@thinkamajig 3 роки тому
what nobody talks about is waste heat. nuclear is one of the least thermally efficient method of power production. if we keep increasing our electricity consumption then we are going to keep increasing our thermal output. aside from solar all forms of generating electricity produce waste heat. all forms of consuming electricity produce waste heat. you can equate watts to BTU/hr. it would probably be more wise to look at efficiencies, on both the generation and consumption sides rather than the source of generation.
@MarcoMa210
@MarcoMa210 Рік тому
7:51 Man the new avengers movie looking sick
@Samantha-vlly
@Samantha-vlly Рік тому
8:04 Y’all should make a game about the catastrophes, would love to play it Still, people in this situation need to pay attention.
@TJ-hg6op
@TJ-hg6op 2 роки тому
I’d prefer the waste generated by an energy source to be in underground barrels than in my lungs.
@bartholomewdan
@bartholomewdan 2 роки тому
Not just my (and everyone else's) lungs, but also the entire damn atmosphere.
@nicefloweytheoverseer7632
@nicefloweytheoverseer7632 Рік тому
@@bartholomewdan true
@raiden542
@raiden542 Рік тому
and the waste to be reused again
@x3woots
@x3woots Рік тому
I prefer my waste be contained in a metal cube capable of withstanding rocket powered freight trains that in the air.
@cageybee7221
@cageybee7221 Рік тому
not to mention the waste eventually becomes safe. Fossil Fuels' Pollution has no half-life, it's in the environment FOREVER. not just a really long time, but ALL OF ETERNITY.
@josefrinderer7111
@josefrinderer7111 3 роки тому
I love how at 0:19 you said, "So who's right?.. Well, it's complicated..." In today's society where discussions are driven by pro-this, anti-that. It's so refreshing to hear nuance being introduced into the conversation. I don't think people even know what nuance means anymore. So thank you.
@Coconut-219
@Coconut-219 3 роки тому
Solar: * Exists * Texas snowstorm: *"Hold my beer"*
@TheConjurersTower
@TheConjurersTower 3 роки тому
And then clearly declared when they were going to begin sharing their opinion after presenting the evidence-based section.
@VladiSSius
@VladiSSius 3 роки тому
What is nuance?
@hedgie9823
@hedgie9823 3 роки тому
@@Coconut-219 Solar:*Still exists because solar wasn't the main cause of the outages*
@brycestewart4717
@brycestewart4717 3 роки тому
People like to think in absolutes now. If you’re not this thing, you’re that thing
@zinialee
@zinialee 11 місяців тому
This was such an amazing explanation and opinion, thank you!
@st.michaelthe1st
@st.michaelthe1st Місяць тому
Specifically using the word "currently" then using a chart that happens to look like a small, everyday dry cell battery wqs pretty clever, i almost didn't caych it, ngl. Excellent video as always.
@voornaamachternaam8559
@voornaamachternaam8559 3 роки тому
I love how birds are educating me more than school
@deadtrollz6533
@deadtrollz6533 3 роки тому
Lol I am testing right now.
@Voya_Walk
@Voya_Walk 3 роки тому
It’s also good because we can learn with our own FREE WILL! Plus when you want to learn something, you learn it with care while schools shove it down and lessen the fun with homework, tests, and essays
@USSAnimeNCC-
@USSAnimeNCC- 3 роки тому
Big brain birds
@shyamkumarkhangembam9169
@shyamkumarkhangembam9169 3 роки тому
Idk what school you go to but here they teach us about nuclear power
@garybrown2039
@garybrown2039 3 роки тому
It’s probably because they care more about it than the governments of the world.
@xxsimonsxx7907
@xxsimonsxx7907 2 роки тому
Please, this video needs community subtitles. Everybody from anywhere needs to see this, and subtitles might open the doors for them.
@jasperfrey2418
@jasperfrey2418 2 роки тому
Wait a fee days, it always comes a bit late.
@nawarelsabaa
@nawarelsabaa 2 роки тому
Community subtitles are sadly dead. UKposts killed them. Translators and Kurzgesagt now need to manually work together for the translations. This will, of course, take longer this way.
@kodo1232
@kodo1232 2 роки тому
yos
@kodo1232
@kodo1232 2 роки тому
s
@michaelkochalka3251
@michaelkochalka3251 2 роки тому
Sadly UKposts killed an incredibly useful accessibility tool.
@Lifeinmotion500
@Lifeinmotion500 Місяць тому
Hi , Kurzgesagt . I would like to thank you all, from the deep of my heart, today we had a final day of(MODULE) IAEA and because of your research we proposed your idea and made a resolution, and me myself got an award of the best Diplomat , thank you❤❤❤
@AbdulGhaffarCh154
@AbdulGhaffarCh154 Рік тому
You nice keep going 💜💜 and spread this massage in the whole world thxx a lot to u that your are spreading this massage in the whole wide world ❤❤
@205up90down
@205up90down 3 роки тому
The animation team has really outdone themselves on this video. Absolutely stunning visuals, even on clips that only appear for a second or two
@primetime3422
@primetime3422 3 роки тому
They always outdo themselves
@DyslexicMitochondria
@DyslexicMitochondria 3 роки тому
without a doubt
@sterlingarcher8041
@sterlingarcher8041 3 роки тому
yeeeeeep
@tringadinga1984
@tringadinga1984 3 роки тому
A little bird being mystified about electricity while playing sekiro Is exactly what I needed today
@rompicoglioni8573
@rompicoglioni8573 3 роки тому
timestamp? :0
@arrowtothebow1140
@arrowtothebow1140 3 роки тому
We need more Sekiro!
@Jamandabop
@Jamandabop 3 роки тому
@@rompicoglioni8573 1:44
@jammintoast
@jammintoast 3 роки тому
Kursgesagt is based
@eordonez85
@eordonez85 3 роки тому
He should sell stuffies-merch of the birds.
@rhenzojaquilmac8402
@rhenzojaquilmac8402 2 роки тому
This is so cool and Thanks for the effort
@mildbuffaloenjoyer9510
@mildbuffaloenjoyer9510 Рік тому
I love the art style. It is so warm yet cold at the same time.
@orrindekock8598
@orrindekock8598 3 роки тому
i expect no less from the kurzgesagt team, but keeping facts and opinions separated and clearly delineated is absolutely crucial in discussions like these. massive props for doing it and doing it well
@Muckylittleme
@Muckylittleme 3 роки тому
Climate change has and always will exist. The whole AGW narrative is absolute horse shit. We had 20 times more Co2 in the atmosphere for hundreds of millions of years and life flourished and the Earth was green and temperate from pole to pole. Isn't it strange that suddenly we are in a century out of billions of years where the Earth climate is supposedly at absolute optimum with polar ice caps in an interglacial period? Who decided that the 21st century out of thousands of life giving centuries was the perfect one for Earth climate that needed to be preserved for evermore? It is one big joke when you look into it properly but it gets much worse when you look into the agenda behind it. Despite the fact warmest were claiming the Earth will die within a decade because of runaway warming, the same people who said the Arctic sea ice would have melted by the end of the last decade, the UN never saw fit to put restraints on the worlds biggest polluter China and left them exempt of all the industry busting carbon taxes and economy busting green regulations they put on Western nations. Now China accounts for more Co2 emissions than the whole of Europe and US put together and while the West suffered the preplanned UN agenda 21 deindustrialisation, China boomed as the global elite who fund the UN think tanks that come up with these agendas all moved their finance and industry there and made trillions from using cheap dirty energy and child labour. That made just a handful of people responsible so much money that they now own almost 2/3 of the entire worlds wealth between them (Oxfam 2017 report) So when I see poor puppet Greta and extinction rebellion demanding zero emissions in London and Bozo the globalist stooge obliging even as the UK economy reels under his nefarious lockdown policies I have to laugh because Co2 makes up just 0.035% of atmosphere and of that only about 3% is man made (0.001%) and Britain's contribution to that just 1% of that which is 0.00001% of atmosphere. That means if Britain had zero emissions tomorrow atmospheric Co2 would be reduced from 0.035% to 0.03499% or by 100/1000th of 1% over decades if not centuries.
@henrybarber288
@henrybarber288 3 роки тому
@@Muckylittleme The whole idea that what is happening is “normal” is absolute horse shit. What you’re talking about is the earth’s climate naturally changing over millions of years, this is happening over a few decades. Also, what you talk about with there having been “better climates” before this current one is complete nonsense. I don’t know if it escaped your notice, but humans weren’t alive in the time of the dinosaurs. We are adapted to live in our current climate, and not just biologically but socially as well. As a species we can only cope with so much flooding, so much drought. We can’t just continue destroying the planet and convince ourselves it’s not our fault.
@Zosu22
@Zosu22 3 роки тому
​ @Dan Brown Oh dear, there is so much here that I hardly know where to begin. Has climate change always existed? Yes, of course it has. Nobody is suggesting that the climate is stationary. Has atmospheric conditions and the climate ever changed this rapidly and continuously in recent history? Not as far as I know, and we're going to continue suffering as a result. Every time earth has faced sudden climate changes in the past, be it from large asteroids or volcanic eruptions, mass death followed. Earth will obviously continue to be fine, but life will definitely be less enjoyable and more full of suffering if we continue on this path of self-indulgence without care for what we do to the world. Of course the climate is changing, but when it's changing this rapidly things don't adapt well. Is China producing a lot of CO2? Yes, and they should be doing their best to limit it. But, like videos this channel has covered in the pass on who is responsible, the west has also polluted more if you look at history. Overall, it should be irrelevant who gets the blame because blaming people will get us nowhere. Everyone should be doing the best they can to prevent further damage. China is definitely far from perfect, from their pollution to disregard for freedoms, but pointing to them and saying "we should be polluting to" is a terrible mindset. Everyone should be striving to be better. And then there's this weird idea of some globalist conspiracy about climate change... what? Ah yes, large fossil fuel producing countries and extremely large and wealthy oil companies couldn't have been contributing to any kind of conspiracy against the idea of global warming, it must be those thousands of scientists and activists who want to destroy us, that definitely makes sense... No matter how you look at it, it makes sense to strive for a future where we mitigate extreme climate change. The overwhelming majority of economists agree that investing in a zero carbon future makes sense given the extreme costs in damages we would face in the future if we don't. The overwhelming majority of scientists agree that rapid climate change is an issue. Has there been hyperbole in the past? Yes. Have there been incorrect predictions made in the past? Also yes. We need to keep researching and discovering more about how everything is being affected. The entire globe is an extremely complicated ecosystem and when something as big as these atmospheric changes we've been inducing these centuries comes along the effects on the system are numerous in ways that we may not know yet. TL:DR: Yes, modern western countries like those in Europe are not contributing as much CO2 in the present as more developing countries, but they have historically contributed more. Does this really matter at the moment? I don't think so. We should all be striving to be better, not worse. The world's ecosystem is extremely complicated with everything interacting with everything else that we might not know what the effects are yet. A global conspiracy that climate change is fake makes literally no sense and is like saying that the moon landing was faked. Even if you ignore climate change, going neutral means less pollution in the places that we live, and I like not breathing in poison. Mitigating extreme climate change is in our own best interests in terms of economics and our future well-being. It's cheaper to put out the stove fire than letting it burn down the entire house.
@orrindekock8598
@orrindekock8598 3 роки тому
@@Zosu22 ya know, on a platform where its so easy to just insult someone you disagree with, i really appreciate the calm and collected response. i applaud you, whoever you may be.
@Muckylittleme
@Muckylittleme 3 роки тому
@@henrybarber288 But it isn't happening over a few decades, that is the debunked hockey stick. You have to look at all the data not just cherry pick the data that pushes your agenda. And regardless there have been bigger changes over shorter periods both warming and cooling. It has clearly escaped your notice that Earth climate is no the same around the globe and mankind survives perfectly well from Africa to Arctic. The Cambrian period had 20 times more Co2 in the atmosphere than now and it was Earths most productive time for diversity of life because it was temperate from pole to pole as I said. And what makes you think this climate is more suitable to man that that? Much more of the Earth is inhospitable now and it is far less green. But then we all know the AGW agenda is anti human not pro human though they do rather favour polar bears for some reason, which by the way are thriving. Listen, environmentalism is no bad thing so long as it is based in reality and actually about the environment. Anti pollution benefits plant and animal alike. But that is not what AGW policies are about as I explained. They are about making very rich and powerful people even richer and more powerful while their puppet celebrities parade around telling you not to eat meat to save the planet while they fly their private and collect mansions and live in opulence with a carbon footprint that is a thousand times higher than yours or mine. So how about, if you really believe this is a crisis, you get all the richest people in the world who are behind the agenda to give up all their luxuries before we start eating insects to save the planet? Surely they would have no issue with it given they are the ones who tell us the Earth is on fire. And "we" are not destroying the planet, at least I know I'm not, I don't even drive a car. The people doing any damage and polluting are the same people behind the AGW agenda, the same people who made trillions in China and had them build thousands of new dirty coal plants to fuel their industry while our clean burning plants were shutdown by their mandates. If nothing else, take a look at the hypocrisy of those who fund the eco-fascists and anarcho-communists and ask how their AGW policies make any sense except for keeping us poor while they get to mop the last remaining wealth.
@kinnan931
@kinnan931 3 роки тому
Josef Rinderer I love how at 0:19 you said, "So who's right?.. Well, it's complicated..." In today's society where discussions are driven by pro-this, anti-that. It's so refreshing to hear nuance being introduced into the conversation. I don't think people even know what nuance means anymore. So thank you.
@KrookedKookie
@KrookedKookie 3 роки тому
Ya he is legitimately trying to convince woke activists to change their minds about something, an absolute mad lad.
@stalsore9813
@stalsore9813 3 роки тому
Polarization is a dangerous thing and ideology is one hell of a drug. I'm happy to see there are still at least a few people that know that everything doesn't have to be black or white
@Anthony-ct3cv
@Anthony-ct3cv 3 роки тому
@@KrookedKookie ... is that your takeaway from this?
@TeensierPython
@TeensierPython 3 роки тому
Sounds like you just agree with his side.
@markhackett2302
@markhackett2302 3 роки тому
@@KrookedKookie And you just proved how "In today's society where discussions are driven by pro-this, anti-that..." exists.
@mohmedazam2913
@mohmedazam2913 2 місяці тому
I want to know what programs you use to make this animation , Thank you for this wonderful video
@chrisbarry9345
@chrisbarry9345 Рік тому
Other problem with renewables is density. Just the amount of space it takes to produce the amount of power can't be scaled in most parts of the world. It's similar to the problem with organic farming
@vz2607
@vz2607 3 роки тому
this channel's production quality is better than most movies right now I swear
@RF_N
@RF_N 3 роки тому
More quality: better
@hivestalker
@hivestalker 3 роки тому
No
@HanMestov
@HanMestov 3 роки тому
@@DyslexicMitochondria your video quality is very good as it is right now
@eeveelutionmetaleon1377
@eeveelutionmetaleon1377 3 роки тому
@@DyslexicMitochondria we believe in you! You can do it :D
@genericusername456
@genericusername456 3 роки тому
Hahahahahhahahaha
@Jim54_
@Jim54_ 2 роки тому
Our rejection of Nuclear power was a massive mistake, and the environment has payed dearly for it as we continue to rely on fossil fuels for our electricity
@alabamaaa7245
@alabamaaa7245 2 роки тому
Yeah i dont really get how some people view nuclear energy as evil
@HaosKitsune
@HaosKitsune 2 роки тому
Nuclear , Geothermal and Hydro (where possible) are the best alternatives to coal (and oil) which are constantly reliable I think, while I love solar power myself it is costly to develop a reliable storage for it though an 1GWh battery storage could save enough energy for a smaller city or town safely it'd be very costly to build. I think new generation nuclear power plants will be even more safer and efficient than they are now while new generation geothermal plants will be much more efficient. I think we can all agree that coal and oil plants should be the enemy whenever someone supports nuclear/solar/wind/etc energy.
@Vastin
@Vastin 2 роки тому
@@alabamaaa7245 Too easy to conflate it with nuclear weapons, and somehow people got it in their heads that radiation was some infinitely deadly invisible force of doom. They tend to forget that every time they step out their front door they're walking out under the system's largest un-shielded fusion reactor. So yeah, it's not great for you, but your body is meant to deal with small scale exposure to radiation on a daily basis. Barring direct exposure to heavily irradiated materials, radiation is just a minor risk factor in your day to day life.
@everdale4609
@everdale4609 2 роки тому
@@alabamaaa7245 my.most likely bet is because of. Chernobyl (sorry if spelled it wrong) and fukushima (again sorry) this causes panic and fear. But they were the best option to fight climate change
@analye6814
@analye6814 2 роки тому
The corps love oil money. Marketed nuclear as evil. Things with an imagined system of goals (i.e. economy) is a funnel for the top; utilitarianism is a corpse to be pecked. Although the distinction between imaginery and practical is blurred by words, I believe we can understand the situation and at least try in eachother's way as all fall into the chaos and void.
@Deeshvoo
@Deeshvoo Рік тому
Kurzgesagt, you should really start a podcast! It would be great knowing that I could take a run and listen to your calming voice talk about how we could terraform Venus, or nuke a city!
@chromerims
@chromerims Рік тому
Superb. Excellence in documentary media 👍. Five stars. This should be requisite content that may compel us to start thinking, and change the discourse and course of our flourishing or failing as an enterprising civilization 🇺🇸. With great appreciation and kindest regards.
@thestudentofficial5483
@thestudentofficial5483 3 роки тому
Politicians with 5 years tenure: you get fossil fuel, you get fossil fuel, EVERYONE GETS FOSSIL FUEL
@bananafoneable
@bananafoneable 3 роки тому
Power plants still use oil based products
@DyslexicMitochondria
@DyslexicMitochondria 3 роки тому
You have to understand that election campaigns need a lot of money and energy companies are the major funders. It's a sad reality but energy companies literally control the world and they would do anything to hinder legislations that puts them under threat. I am actually currently making a video about this very topic. Its the grim reality
@epicstuff7522
@epicstuff7522 3 роки тому
@@DyslexicMitochondria sad truth
@tomasbeltran04050
@tomasbeltran04050 3 роки тому
You need to understand that democracy is the ad populum fallacy made into a political system
@igniex
@igniex 3 роки тому
@@tomasbeltran04050 yeah... its quite depressing 😓
@lorenzoscarpato2877
@lorenzoscarpato2877 3 роки тому
Me: searching for simple answers Kurzgesagt in every single video: "well it's complicaded..."
@BroadcastingCN
@BroadcastingCN 3 роки тому
mh
@BroadcastingCN
@BroadcastingCN 3 роки тому
compliacaded
@shyamkumarkhangembam9169
@shyamkumarkhangembam9169 3 роки тому
"complicaded
@USSAnimeNCC-
@USSAnimeNCC- 3 роки тому
Alway has been
@sketchysd1091
@sketchysd1091 3 роки тому
YESS Every video from now on must start with that
@ShortFuseFighting
@ShortFuseFighting 10 місяців тому
this artstyle deserves a friggin' oscar !
@UrielDesLichtes
@UrielDesLichtes Рік тому
There is also the fact that battery technology also needs to change as lithium-ion batteries which are the main ones we use are non-renewable and the materials for them are starting to run low
@Transfixed
@Transfixed 2 роки тому
Modern nuclear plants are so good that they can burn the waste from old plants as fuel! It's tragic that there isn't enough public knowledge and political will to build nuclear in western countries :(
@zombieguyproducion
@zombieguyproducion 2 роки тому
It's all solely due to Chernobyl sadly. :/
@stevealdrich2472
@stevealdrich2472 2 роки тому
If they can burn the waste, why don't they do it? At least one country should have tried it by now. If it worked, we'd have heard about it. Disposing of nuclear waste is one of the biggest problems on planet earth. What's your source of information? What makes you think the plants can burn the waste?
@mikhailoleynikov
@mikhailoleynikov 2 роки тому
@@stevealdrich2472 not all waste can be burnt, and it isn’t reused as is, it requires expensive processing to make it burnable again. It all comes to the fact, that it’s much cheaper to mine new nuclear fuel and bury used fuel, than to reuse the waste. Though this may change with additional research, or just with scale
@stevealdrich2472
@stevealdrich2472 2 роки тому
@@mikhailoleynikov would be wonderful if the reuse came to pass. If this is a viable technique then I am all for it
@keselekbakiak
@keselekbakiak 2 роки тому
@@stevealdrich2472 even if they manage to create this reuse technology, it will be expensive. And most of countries cant afford it. So in the end the majority will still rely on fossil fuel.
@lac1260
@lac1260 2 роки тому
I really appreciate you labeling your opinion portion. Few information portals do that anymore
@theaagmasti
@theaagmasti 2 роки тому
B.e.S.T f'u"l'l D.a.T.i.n.G -L-o-V-e-S-e-X-----۞------------ livegirls19. com 》》 𝙊𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝘼𝙙𝙪𝙡𝙩 《《 !❤️ 在整個人類歷史上,強者,富人和具有狡猾特質的人捕食部落,氏族,城鎮,城市和鄉村中的弱者,無`'守和貧窮成員。然而,人類的生存意願迫使那些被拒絕,被剝奪或摧毀的基本需求的人們找到了一種生活方式,並繼續將其DNA融入不斷發展的人類社會。 說到食物,不要以為那些被拒絕的人只吃垃圾。相反,他們學會了在被忽視的肉類和蔬菜中尋找營養。他們學會了清潔,切塊,調味和慢燉慢燉的野菜和肉類,在食品市場上被忽略的部分家用蔬菜和肉類,並且學會了使用芳香的木煙(如山核桃,山核桃和豆科灌木 來調味食物煮的時候 1618745910
@duolingobird8196
@duolingobird8196 Рік тому
As a Michigander for some reason people are trying to immediately shut down the plant Fermi 2 and keep saying that Fermi 3 should be cancelled and “it will be the next Chernobyl.” They are also pushing for solar everywhere even though solar and wind could probably not support the entirety of Detroit (unless you decided to cover large swaths of land), let alone the entirety of Michigan and part of Ontario.
@serge9492
@serge9492 Рік тому
2:13 I know, small detail BUT when he flips the swith and the power goes off the robots begin losing altitude, howewer they were gaining while the power was on allso about nuclear ALL soviet powerplants are slowly going offline because the parts arent manufactured anymore+the fuel for them is becoming rare
@JohnSmith-qq7fm
@JohnSmith-qq7fm 3 роки тому
Kurzgesagt: "Why should we make things harder than necessary?" Rest of the world: "Hold my beer and watch this....."
@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721
@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 2 роки тому
Oh, right. I forgot how human humans tend to be.
@monito8823
@monito8823 2 роки тому
This is one of the wisest things ever said. Humanity really does tend to make things harder than necessary.
@robertopato543
@robertopato543 2 роки тому
We are humans nothing is perfect for us...
@Operational117
@Operational117 2 роки тому
Me: **takes their beer and throws it at their face** “How ‘bout no?”
@modelgio360
@modelgio360 2 роки тому
We have humans are greedy
@kewlman5417
@kewlman5417 3 роки тому
You know it's about to get good when you hear *"Well, its complicated"*
@midnightMoonlight09
@midnightMoonlight09 3 роки тому
up there right next to _"or is it?"_ -michael please come back to making big videos, i miss them-
@OfficialGhost_Orchid
@OfficialGhost_Orchid 2 роки тому
mhm
@ede-uj4sz
@ede-uj4sz Рік тому
The real problem is greed, the people who hold the wealth, like the governments are just not bothered to invest extremely large amounts into the research needed. But hey, hopefully it’ll change soon enough
@SebastienMay
@SebastienMay Рік тому
Love that Sekiro reference at 1:45 👌
@krn0z.741
@krn0z.741 2 роки тому
So Nuclear Man, Lady Hydro, Solarbot and Lord Robowind have to combine their unique abilities to defend the world against Polution Master and his fearsome Thanos Snap
@MatthewHolevinski
@MatthewHolevinski 2 роки тому
Hahaha nice. When your powers combine I am captaaaain planet
@dutchseitshiro9472
@dutchseitshiro9472 2 роки тому
🤣🤣🤣🤣 I love that!
@TheKhashix
@TheKhashix 2 роки тому
Lady hydro kinda bad tho ngl 😳
@lopil4566
@lopil4566 2 роки тому
@@TheKhashix please go outside and touch grass...
@natanzadworny2287
@natanzadworny2287 2 роки тому
And he has 4 of the stones already...
@Zenith8669
@Zenith8669 2 роки тому
I love how you guys always say “Well, it’s COMPLICATED!”
@mrinchatim
@mrinchatim 2 роки тому
yes i love this, it can be so easy to deduce something down in a b&w way but nothing is ever that simple all sides need consideration
@nichsulol4844
@nichsulol4844 2 роки тому
then so yeah dream keep going strutucture
@KO_Manic
@KO_Manic 2 роки тому
Because it is
@dascplayer740
@dascplayer740 Рік тому
For my Pokémon fans out there. I love how there are magnemites as part of the animation. 2:10
@jrsixowfour8674
@jrsixowfour8674 Рік тому
I live in yukon canada 🇨🇦 and it is now cheaper to use the power company to heat my home when I used to use wooden stove to heat my home, cords of wood now is $500, more than double from this time last year.
@cloverxp1
@cloverxp1 2 роки тому
This channel deserves to be trending.
@klokoloko2114
@klokoloko2114 2 роки тому
Comment 10 times
@chandarasoth2219
@chandarasoth2219 2 роки тому
Well right now it 13 on trending
@klokoloko2114
@klokoloko2114 2 роки тому
@@chandarasoth2219 Yes.
@henrychu495
@henrychu495 2 роки тому
@Dana Durnford ah yes nuclear tests are definitely the same thing as nuclear power plants
@cloverxp1
@cloverxp1 2 роки тому
@Free Speech Bot i meant the whole channel. like every video it posts
@elcrit7860
@elcrit7860 3 роки тому
Every video from this channel in a nutshell: "its complicated."
@summushieremiasclarkson4700
@summushieremiasclarkson4700 3 роки тому
Because it is, but nuclear is the best solution, and has been for decades.
@DarrensGeneralInfo
@DarrensGeneralInfo 3 роки тому
Hi there.. Please visit my channel if you love science and general knowledge
@criogenic1839
@criogenic1839 3 роки тому
Kurzgesagt in a nutshell
@retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456
@retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456 3 роки тому
@F*СК MЕ - СНЕCK МY РR0FILЕ stfu bot
@retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456
@retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456 3 роки тому
@@DarrensGeneralInfo no lmao make actual content and not spam garbage
@mohnplayz8859
@mohnplayz8859 Рік тому
2:10 did anyone else other than me notice the pokemon magnimite in the bottom left
@mohamedhamis853
@mohamedhamis853 Місяць тому
I sure did.
@WALID0306
@WALID0306 8 місяців тому
thanks !! I like a lot these videos 👏👏👏👏
@Brody961
@Brody961 3 роки тому
Much respect over the simple fact that they explicitly said which part of their video was opinion based. We need much more of that
@iamseamonkey6688
@iamseamonkey6688 3 роки тому
they do that in most of their videos actually, but this time was far more explicit then usual. most of the time they have the duck in the corner holding an 'opinion' sign or just show to title slide more briefly.
@yeungscs
@yeungscs 2 роки тому
7:57 "it might be a good idea to see nuclear and renewables not as opponents but as partners" THANK YOU
@mh7491
@mh7491 2 роки тому
RIGHT ON
@irthlingz
@irthlingz 2 роки тому
That would be nice, but would it really happen? In the past the nuclear industry has worked to cripple the emergence of renewable energy.
@Genomsnittet
@Genomsnittet 2 роки тому
This is a very controversial topic. Usually the left is for renewables, the right is for nuclear. I'm left, but I see nuke as a potential friend anyway. People are too rigid in their thinking sometimes
@lucasgodoy688
@lucasgodoy688 2 роки тому
@@irthlingz just as renewables industries work really hard to stop nuclear emergence nowadays. A lot of green organisations demonize every aspect of nuclear and spread a lot of fear and misinformation about nuclear power.
@mikeydude750
@mikeydude750 2 роки тому
Absolutely. I am definitely in the pro-nuclear camp but there's a lot to be said for having local distributed sources of electricity generated by renewable clean sources, not just to add to the baseline source nuclear can handle but also for resiliency against the increasing extreme weather events we're going through (being in California and seeing all the wildfires each year getting worse and worse, our electrical grid cannot cope). Transmission line losses alone are enough to argue that while we can't entirely rely on renewables, generating more electricity locally through city or even neighborhood-centric grids lets us reduce those by quite a bit.
@borysbuza4783
@borysbuza4783 Рік тому
Sure we do. thank you for coming to my TED talk.
@amkamomega
@amkamomega Рік тому
6:18 that board in the back has sator arepo tenet on it!!
@slavicnonatho8062
@slavicnonatho8062 3 роки тому
"Well, it's complicated" -every argument in the world, ever
@Wittty_
@Wittty_ 3 роки тому
@Rita Mellon - 25 y.o - WÁNȚ Š[Ē]X !!! shut up bot
@Wittty_
@Wittty_ 3 роки тому
@trixlr yea I know
@macdjord
@macdjord 3 роки тому
If it were simple, we'd have solved it already.
@josefptacek113
@josefptacek113 3 роки тому
@@macdjord no we won't becoas we are bunch of cowards that don't make choices that actually matter and instead leting idiots making up genders and ruining cultures around the world
@josefptacek113
@josefptacek113 3 роки тому
@Ami Deus some things are simple some are complicated. But saying it's complicated usually means the person wants for some reason support the worse option and uses "it's complicated" as distraction so he can justify his option more easily. Not saying it's always the case. For example: chosing between nuclear and natural energy is simple Nuclear energy is cleaner and more effective. But whats complicated is disposal of nuclear wastes. There are lots of options and we must figure out which is best
@paravirallinen
@paravirallinen 3 роки тому
Can we just talk about how beautiful these animations are
@augustwinterman6952
@augustwinterman6952 3 роки тому
Yes. And they keep getting better.
@jlwilder8436
@jlwilder8436 3 роки тому
We've been talking about it for years.
@whohouuu
@whohouuu 3 роки тому
@@jerramrocks9136 what reward?
@MantaKizaemonFTW
@MantaKizaemonFTW 3 роки тому
YES
@ehhhhh596
@ehhhhh596 3 роки тому
@@jerramrocks9136 if you mean those silver, gold and diamond play button I'm pretty sure they already have those
@emanuellindstrom4003
@emanuellindstrom4003 Рік тому
THANK YOU! This saved my physics project 😄
@-SKULL-
@-SKULL- Рік тому
If humanity wants to use renewables, then each renewable should be suitable for certain spots like solar for desert like environments as well as tropical.
Worst Nuclear Accidents in History
10:39
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 10 млн
We WILL Fix Climate Change!
16:11
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 11 млн
Гражданская оборона 2024 - 12 полный выпуск
1:00:39
Телеканал ICTV
Переглядів 375 тис.
Лама Мама А4 и Кунг-фу Панда топчик❤️
00:22
Дим Димыч
Переглядів 2,4 млн
The Economics of Nuclear Energy
16:11
Real Engineering
Переглядів 1,8 млн
Geoengineering: A Horrible Idea We Might Have to Do
9:10
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 10 млн
Why is this number everywhere?
23:51
Veritasium
Переглядів 887 тис.
Who Is Responsible For Climate Change? - Who Needs To Fix It?
10:36
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 10 млн
Unlimited Resources From Space - Asteroid Mining
7:56
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 10 млн
Why Germany Hates Nuclear Power
19:38
Real Engineering
Переглядів 1,9 млн
Can YOU Fix Climate Change?
15:50
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Переглядів 13 млн