Hi kids! I am a software developer since 90's, and I've heard this statement multiple times during my career. The first time I heard it was back in the 90's when Java was invented. The statement back then was that since you could write object oriented code, then coding was so easy that every human on the planet could do it, and no software developers was no longer needed in the future.. However it turned out the opposite all the times in the past. Maybe it will be different now that Generative AI is available? Well... My observations during the last year has shows the complete opposite once again. As a software developer I have never before seen such increase in demand for my skills and services from my customers. I need to turn down 90% of all projects that need my help to bring AI tools and software to their businesses. Sadly all my colleagues face the same problem. We need more software developers to be able to meet this enormous increase in demand. So if you ask me if becoming a software developer is useless nowadays, I will say definitely not! Come and work with me! :) Wish you the best!! P.S. My english is bad, I know. I am from Sweden.

learning coding is not just learning coding but learning the fundamental things behind

Learn learn, learn upskill, upskill upskill while the standard of living of middle-class goes down down down and down this world of high technology looks more and more like hell. I don’t wanna learn all the time I want to relax and enjoy life ffs

the fundamental structure, logic, & code behind the magic is very important & will continue to be valuable.

Never take a CEO's word at face value. There is always an ulterior motive behind the things they say. It's not necessarily intentionally sinister, but the reality is that it's in their best interest to guide the masses (that's you and me) toward the kind of things that benefit them and their companies. I have nothing against individual CEOs personally, but they are the public-facing corporate voice of their companies. Even if a CEO made an absolutely factual statement, such as "the sun is hot," I would still have doubts about their motives. That's not to say that it is useless to pay attention to what they say, because we can gauge their intent by the character of their message. However, do not base your entire professional career around their suggestions. As long as computers exist, there will always be a need for software developers building the foundation. I am not a software engineer, I just want to encourage people to think for themselves. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

I understand Jensen's point. He suggests that in the near future, AI may enable anyone to create software effortlessly, akin to playing tic-tac-toe. However, for highly intricate software, a single prompt may not suffice. You'll need to provide AI with detailed instructions regarding workflows, procedures, processes, and more. This necessitates expertise in your chosen field to effectively communicate with AI and ensure the development of the desired software.

Been beating myself up a bit that I sold my 53 shares of NVDA at $303 each back in May 2023. Now thinking of liquidating a few other investments to rebuy but afraid to do so. I also currently have 500k in savings making me next to nothing.

Every CEO: "Don't learn this or that. We already did it."

I do not "code". I develop Software and have been doing it for 30+ years. I asked ChatGPT to design a QuadTree in C++ that has a user defined interface to set the node levels, add and delete nodes from the root down to the specified level and render the entire thing in OpenGL. NOT. It failed hard. Then I asked if it to write C++ to implement a moving average FFT filter. NOT. I do not see ChatGPT or AI replacing Software Engineers anytime soon, if at all.

In other words: "Give us the power to decide and design YOUR life's point of view please? "

This is absolutely predictable speak from a CEO of a tech company who wants to create consumers and reduce competitors. The number of people who should take this 'advice' seriously, if they're serious about computer science, is zero.

If I had a kid, I would encourage them to learn to create simple things with technology that solves problems. That has always been profitable.

No brainer. Semiconductor and AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I have made more than 200% ROI from NVIDIA with the assistance of my fa, I won’t fail to mention. I agree the stock would go higher in the next couple of days.

The next step is to have more companies that can build and sell what Nvidia sells. And that will take more programmers so keep learning to code people.

Until 2023, I was studying architecture and high-density logistics. The tools and technology I've discovered are cutting-edge. This inspired me to do more, faster, to learn from mistakes quickly, optimize output, and increase value tenfold. Today, I'm delving into understanding Python, coding, and training LLMs with data from the past decade. All of this is aimed at improving building processes, optimizing time, materials, and resources. Your classes and videos provide wonderful encouragement for reinventing myself.

I’ve been coding for 28 years now and what makes a great developer is knowing how to elegantly organize your thoughts and express them in code. I’ve seen many devs that know a language or framework really well but were awful at writing good code. So you will really need to know how to come up with great solutions for complex problems and clearly express those solutions to AI.

I just stumbled upon you and the content is fantastic. I feel like you keep a healthy balance between your own personal opinions that are also very genuine and the content you are relaying. I have been saying to my younger brothers exactly the same for the last 4 years since I started prompt engineering - that they should pursue life sciences and gain domain expertise (personally I also studied physics and chemistry and went on to IJSO during high school, but I left that path to just help businesses, get to know and travel the world). I wholeheartedly believe that humanizing AI and setting up social safety nets is the way to go and I love what you guys are doing with Synthminds. I might get back into neuroscience like I originally wanted to :P

Although I have a computer science background, I'm not a great programmer, so AI has been a game changer for me. I do find that it helps to be enough of a programmer that you can either catch mistakes, or help the AI fix them through testing. And yes, domain expertise is also critical. Interesting side note: I have a coworker who is a phenomenal programmer, but doesn't have good communication skills - he has given up on AI, saying that he can't get it to do anything useful or reliable! In order to effectively use AI as a programming assistant, I think the ideal skills (in order) are: communication, domain expertise, testing/validation, and finally some amount of programming.

Having more programmers means greater accessibility and open technology for all. However, if we are simply users of new technology, we risk losing control. Corporations will then build what they want and control everything.

@Goda Go. Great video! I am in the middle of a Gen AI for business certificate, and we're leveraging Python to prompt engineer at scale. I need to become more versed in Python, but with the assistance of LLMs, I have become a faster learner in this space. You hit the nail on the head; people need to learn how to solve problems. It is less about the code and more about identifying sustainable solutions. We ought to push ourselves and dream more. Jensen Huang's notion of life engineering is a prime example of that. Instead of viewing this as potential for mass job replacement, we should look at AI as a mass capability enhancement. Thanks!

I totally disagree with this and with NVIDIA CEO advice. You don't see the beauty of it neither the future of it. Everybody can write, but writing doesn't make you a writer. Or, are you saying that having a calculator makes you a mathematician?

Telling people to not learn programming because AI will do it for you is the dumbest advice you could give unless you want people to become even more dependent on tech and unable to understand and master it….oh, I see 🤔

Gemini summary (Timestamp may not be accurate) According to Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, people should study biology instead of computer science. [1:50, 2:12] In the video, Jensen Huang argues that although computer science is a valuable field, biology is a more impactful field and will become even more important in the future. [2:08, 2:12] He believes that biology is becoming a field of engineering, and that understanding biology will be important for solving problems in areas such as medicine, materials science, and energy. [2:12, 2:20] The video also discusses the concept of prompt engineering, which is the process of using specific language to get AI models to generate the desired output. [3:16, 3:21] The speaker argues that prompt engineering is an important skill to learn, but that it is not a replacement for computer science or domain expertise. [8:22, 8:23] In the future, the most successful people will likely be those who have a combination of skills in biology, prompt engineering, and computer science. [9:22, 9:23]

Thank you so much for this edit, really appreciate it. Thank you

Great video! Times are changing very rapidly from my perspective. I have been using GPTs for over a year now and this is extremely powerful technology. My output is 5X in producing software, business communications, papers, and presentations. The use of AI has become indispensable to me.

OK, my answer to your question - I believe the way things are progressing, as the guy said, you won't need to be coder, but I also feel you won't need to know 'prompt engineering' either. To me that very expression is seeking to complicate things, to create a barrier - 'I'm a prompt engineer; pay me'. AI already understands simple English instructions, especially with a bit of back and forth. I've already seen a tool with a 'magic prompt', where you give it your prompt, an AI figures out a better version of the prompt and feeds it to an image-creator. I find it hard to believe in 2 or 3 years we'll still be having to spoon-feed an AI with very carefully-worded or 'engineered' prompts. It will just understand what you want, or will ask some questions and then understand. Among other things I'm a copywriter, so I know the power of careful wording, but I don't see it applying to AI in the same way, other than jailbreaking perhaps. To say "I'm an expert in talking to something in plain English" doesn't strike me as a strong career over the long-term. Having said that, most people don't understand the value of a copywriter either, because "it's just writing", and anyone can do that? If I were younger, full of energy and no other options I'd certainly explore 'prompt engineering', but I suspect by the term you've learned it, you'll be out of date because the AI won't need such hand-holding. A general-purpose AI that can do prompts for you, in 3...2...

ur one of my new fav youtuber in AI space, very humble, also explore the possibility of making 2 minute news express type of videos!

duuuuuude, you have my gratatude!!! I have completly lost it when I heard the Jensen Huang's speech about AI and programming. Now BACK TO WORK. GO! GO! GO00000000001

0:00: ⚙ Future focus: Emphasize learning human-centered computing technology over programming for children's education. 2:27: ⚙ Closing the technology divide through easier AI engagement and upskilling for better prompt optimization. 4:53: 💻 Importance of understanding software for future technology adaptation. 7:29: ⚙ Importance of domain expertise in guiding AI models for optimal outcomes. 9:19: ⚙ Life sciences transitioning to life engineering, with digital biology becoming an engineering field. Recapped using Tammy AI

One question please! Is NVIDIA a safe buy to outperform the market this year? I'm tired of these new buys every week, just to make up some assets with low percentage on my $236k portfolio and try to keep everything around 10%.

Grateful I’ve spent the last year + focused on learning and utilizing many of the best Ai content creation tools and for my new brand I’m releasing this week! For One and ALL

Overall, just great! It gives a direction of where to focus on! Thanks for doing this work for all of us! The last part ist just getting under my skin. The music just gave me small goosebumps 😁

First step, remove coding interviews from all Nvidia job applications.

I have just started using copilot to assist me with my programming, and it's most useful contribution so far is trying it's best to get .Net Maui to actually work. So far neither of us have succeeded, but it is great to have an assistant. Prompts like translate that android java to c#, or what file action am I supposed to give that file have produced surprisingly helpful results. I think understanding code makes the whole process a lot more efficient though. Plus converting ideas or instructions in my mind to natural language can be less efficient than actually doing it directly myself. Maybe when Elon Musk's idea of mind to AI is realized we wont need to write code anymore, draw artwork, or compose music, but until then I think it is still useful.

I start to feel that most of the AI bros who tell you to stop learning programming are just trying to beat the competition in a tighter job market. All of these people have a personal agenda. Critical thinking is probably the most useful skill out there to avoid being manipulated by online gurus.

Great job providing clarity on Jensen Huang's message; context is key in understanding the implications of AI. For entrepreneurs, it's crucial to follow AI trends and deeply understand the ethical considerations and long-term strategies that leaders like Huang discuss. This insight can be a game-changer for startups looking to innovate responsibly in the tech space.

In the early 2000s I met a guy at a party who was working in biotech. He claimed the 21st century was the century of biotech, and that in the near future, kids would be designing and making their own Pokemon in real life.

the skill of a software engineer/developer is not to code a specific language - it is about the problem solving and the translation of problems into a step by step process. it would be interesting to see if and how programming languages fade away, as those are already more human readable layer above the actual instructions a machine takes and processes - its all zeros and ones in the end.

Glad you got through your "personal stuff" without dying a horrible and messy death. I value your videos!

As a programmer since 1994 I can’t tell you this: each time you learn to program (any kind of programing from assembler to C#) in fact, you are learning how to TALK to the computer to perform the tasks YOU require in order to produce the OUTPUT you need, this step is gigantic towards Isaac Asimov’s robot dream, programing languages are only needed because we cannot talk to a computer to program itself…yet.

I foresee an even larger gap between the people wanting to get into computer science and those who are already very experienced as engineers. AI is promising to perform all of the rudimentary coding work. Which leaves the hard tasks of designing complex systems to the already existing senior professionals. There was already a bias against hiring and training up junior software professionals, but now there is AI to compete with them as well. This is causing a brain drain as senior professionals are retiring, or unwilling to move around due to already being hired with a sweet gig. There are not enough truly senior level engineers available (I'm not talking about the fake, inflated titles of some engineers). We aren't teaching a new generation to have the underlying knowledge and experience to make wise decisions with AI. We just have lots of CEO's telling us "don't learn to code, AI will do that". It's not enough to just have AI capable of coding, we need educated professionals who know how, why, and what to tell the AI to build. Without that, egregious and horrifying mistakes will be made and we will see AI do some very bad things.

Goda Go, this video is so very important and so, Thank You. Correct AI use brings human creativity closer to creating. I can't think of how to say it more simply. Creativity to Creating. So, it's inaccurate to say AI will displace a person - rather, it should allow a person to work in new ways. Using original thought will comprise most of the working day - imagine that. Years ago, I began a personal project to automate all process engineering dimensions for any desired goal/set of requirements. I could see the framework in my mind. Now, either myself or my successors can achieve the vision that was beyond the tools and time I had in the past. Makes me excited to imagine what we will achieve. Thank You

Glad to see youre doing well. Love your content.

I come from a mechanical engineering background, and for the past 6 months, I have learned Python from prompting Chat GPT and Gemini. Now I have an opportunity with a recruiting agency to start entry level software roles. However, I am questioning the value of this and wonder if I'd be better off using these skills for myself and building low/no-code tools as a business enterprise. What ways are you using these tools in your business, Goda?

At first the idea of NOT learning things like programing sounds good but it belies the need to customize and get under the hood of things and assumes that people have the depth of understanding to create on that level...most don't... This reminds me of learning to play music but not wanting to learn theory. You are NOT better or more creative at something that you don't understand. You don't speak a language well because you only know a few words...the ability to create and break rules means you generally need to KNOW the rules SO you can "break" them...

Wonderful video !! This 70 yo man grew up with a Grollier's OUR WONDERFUL WORLD Encyclopedia that had a wonderful index to help you find anything in the 17 volume encyclopedia. I would come home from school and dive into any volume and leaf through it till I went through the entire set of books. When elder sibling tried to assert that he knew how many Karats made pure gold; I simply looked it up and put the issue to rest. This helped tremendously with doing legal research in law school using word search strings to find an issue. But before I got a law degree I got a teaching degree. I was an Industrial Arts teacher. This topic is hugely important. I hope it does not do away with the pleasure of using a table saw to turn a few boards into attractive useful things. Throwing a clay pot can be huge fun. Making special hardware out of leather goes back to indian technology. To lose those technologies due to this wonderful expedient may facilitate life; let's don't let it take the fun out of work-life.

CEO who have never coded advising students note to code. Role of CEO is market their new product, not to advise.

"Don't learn to code, let us do it." I approve this message 👍 Let those of us who know what they are doing do it, and the rest can call themselves prompt engineers. 🤣

It will be a nightmare to resolve bugs caused by ai generated code(especially if you don't know the underlying programming language). It's just that Nvidia wants more money from investors.

It really clicked for me when Jensen highlighted life, biology study. There was only one topic I asked Chat GPT3.5 and that was a very carefully worded couple of questions about Mitochondria's potential role in consciousness(with a little hint as to a really useful clue.) Chat GPT didn't really grok it but it showed promise in it's research assistant skills.

My favorite class in computer science was design. I think that thinking in terms of how to get things done would be a great class for anyone trying to understand how computers work.

This sounds like telling people to stop learning math because we made calculators 😂

The best way to work with ai is probably by using a conversation and not just one prompt.

I am still sticking to pursue fundamental basic science research of physics, chemistry, biology and mathematics but accompanied by engineering and technology fields as an interdisciplinary thing . I still wonder why entropy increases, why electron has only two spins , somethings in physics are laws but don't have any answer to 'why' more fundamentally , ofcourse we observe nature , discover something new and make laws , that's what a scientist does , to wonder and to be curious. Einstein started wondering how gravity works and what it is actually , so he went more into the depth of fundamentals that lead to his ground breaking General Relativity theory . Question the very basics , this generation has lost that thing, that general curiosity, to amaze and to question

I think as just a person that is just here to help, one will need to understand the core data / set, that is being worked with and the bigger outcome. The other items will just work themselves out. I am amazed how fast this has come from the first person's working on AI. Build Data On.

People don't understand how SCARY a world where only AI can code is. Everything depends on code nowadays. If nobody can do it, one big mistake from the AI can send us back centuries. And it WILL make mistakes. But that scenario is unrealistic so whatever. There is an even more interesting logic: in a world where AI is good enough to program on it's own the entire product, it would essentially be at the level of AGI (and a very advanced one too) because programming is one of the hardest human endeavors. And in that kind of world everything will be made by AI. If programming can be automated, anything can. So by learning programming you are entering a flowchart scenario with only 2 branches: either your skill is still heavily needed or the entire world requires no skills of any kind at which point you shouldn't have bothered with any other skill anyway. It is truly the safest career path possible. (Unless you are a shit programmer, of course :D ) And in the scenario where the programmer is using AI tools to speed up the process (the most realistic one) - you still need to be a full programmer...

What Jensen is suggesting is very dangerous. It can lead to loss of general knowledge of coding and in future a total AI dependance because no one will understand the code AI spits out.

Hi! How could I register as an audience guest for the TEDx conversation with Amy Zolotow? I'm deeply curious about the topic and can't seem to find a link to take part in the event :(

I remember drawing on the back of my exam sheet back then in 2008, a conversation between a girl and GLaDOS (Portal was the craze back then). She asked GLaDOS to code the exam questions for her. Needless to say, I failed that exam. 16 years later, a moment that I knew exactly will happen finally happens.

The rule is this:Pick an advice of a big tech CEO and do the opposite.

Why even to learn prompting when chatgpt can list all the prompts according to your requirements...

Wishing you well with whatever you're going through. Keep up the great work. Regards.

There's no reason AI cant also easily learn prompt engineering and in fact will make it obsolete with far more efficient instruction set that removes inherent bias/ambiguity of human language. Jensen has to know this but as someone beholden to shareholders, he's also looking to maximize profit.

They want to sell their GPUs

keep 'em ignorant and unskilled AI "garbage-in/garbage-out" is going to get worse designers will erroneously think they are designing something better, when just the opposite happens people will be more efficiently blabbering nonsense, and producing more nonsense

This channel is awesome! Thank you!❤

Well I'm glad i found your chnanel. I was losing hope but now i get the idea of these ceo's

Just found your channel, love your stuff - video content,

Calculators did not remove Math teachers so why to fear

Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video. I have found it illuminating.

Hi Goda, I hope you are doing well, I caught what you said at the end about going through some personal stuff, I wish you the best. I hope to be joining Uplimit in the near future.

1-Stop hyping this prompt engineering stuff. Just talk with the AI like your regular life chats. 2-Yes, coding and programming will be useless and will be over, but it's all about time. Coding didn't even exist until the 1950s, so of course, it will end. But you know what else will end? Surgeries, nutritionists. Every job will change; every job was already changing. And it is not an instant change, like on 25th April 2026, all programming languages will be shut down. :) There is nothing like that. But it is not hard to see that the usage of programming languages for developing software will decrease because of the creation skills of AI, and at one point, it all will be over slowly. These are my takes.

you're doing the real research and providing the value. Thank you!

I think learning programming now, just like you said in the video, helps to build problem-solving skills. And that's important as we interact with AI tools. My tech journey in 2023, was building skills in programming with Go and my approach in 2024 is domain expertise. Great video Goda, thanks for sharing.

I recommend listening to what Dr. Charles Severance has to say about Jensen Huang's quote. When you hear similar comments like this, you should first think and analyze the purpose behind Jensen Huang's phrase. And then think that these quotes do not refer to programming, or learning something specific, but rather have the intention of increasing the market and making money.

yes, he said that. He does what every CEO does: feed the hype and hope his shares will rise even higher this year. What AI will do is to make programmers much more productive. Learn programming. Learn computer science. The future will be even more exciting than ever before.

This video has taught me that people seriously underestimate the gravity of coming events. They're trying to compartmentalize AI agents and AGI like it's just a product, and not realizing how pervasive it is to the point where nothing involving labor and skill is needed (no not even prompts) that AGI could not itself do far better. Once Perceive -> Reason -> Decide -> Act human processes can be simulated by AGI what can a human possibly do. Skilled jobs will be the first to go, hardware jobs will be the last as robots need to be economical en masse but perhaps AGI will figure that out. Mass unemployment is inevitable, within 2 years. The world economy is radically going to change, we'll be talking about UBI. I had a guy tell me to learn deployment as THAT will be the best job...why wouldn't AGI be the best at a skill like deployment too, far better than a human at figuring out how to deploy AI software and infra.

Thank you for posting. Praying for you. God bless.

I am just watching Harvard CS50 and when I read the title or listen to the comments of the CEO, I wonder why wouldn’t anyone want to learn programming like that CS50. It’s about 12 weeks of your life and it covers a lot of the basic fundamentals. It doesn’t harm anyone but it can only make you better at what you do.

Watching you in that video made me realize what an amazing role model you are. Your confidence and strength really shine through in an empowering way:)

I am pre-AI. So, now I see I am being replaced. I got ChatGPT to verbally chat with me. Thank you Goda Go for your YT content.

This is quite interesting and definitely worth paying attention to. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

And we need people who will fight for the right to live non-digitized lives. Humans are not machines and we need freedom from controlling bureaucracy. Population expansion issues are a temporary problem, and we need people who will continue to nurture and protect our reserves of natural ecosystems and human knowledge of living simply and in harmony with nature.

This sort of technology has both its potential beneficial uses, as well as its severe dangers. I think the question more people should be asking, is not "is AI technology good or bad" but rather, "is humanity ready for this type of technology?" -- and if we look around at the general state of the world and how people act towards each other, I would say that the answer is a resounding NO. But ready or not, here it comes. And we're going to have to deal with the repercussions of this, whether we like it or not.

It sounds good. It is narrowing the gap between people who are intermediate coders and those who are not so familiar with programming.

I think what Jensen meant was don't learn programming for the purpose of it being your profession. He didn't follow up with the positives I'm sure due to time constraints and the loss of focus of his overall message. Prompt Engineering is incredibly important. It is the details we include that creates the right question. It is providing an expectation to an unknown answer. It is the art of digital focus. While 2023 allowed those willing to bleed a little to learn about A.I. 2024 will produce tools to prevent such fatigue. I don't regret the bleed, but look forward to the tools that permit my ideas a suitable canvas so I can focus on helping those in need.

What movie does that footage come from?

I asked Gemini AI what it thinks about Jenson Huang's statement and here is the summary part of the reply: While AI will undoubtedly change the way we code, it's unlikely to completely eliminate the need for coding skills. The focus might shift towards understanding and utilizing AI tools for development.

Imo creativity/ ideation as applied to problem identification and solution are key as well 👍

Somone from the Oxford said that there are 3 segments of AI users: 1. Not much advance in programming, default front-end etc. 2. API users 3. Software engineering experts. I every one mentioned segment prompt engineering is ab essential.

Graphical user interface has replaced command line interface which was very hard for some people. Everyone including children become command expert when gui took over the world. Now ai, promt engineering is fast replacing coding. Also welcome to new tech like no code/low code. Isnt the ai and promt engeneering is just most highest level of coding language. I would like to say to traditionalists who say ai will never replaced coding that there is no need for acting like thier feeling are hurt. Fact doesn't care about one's feelings. Beacuse if you look back at history paper replaced tablets ink replaced tablet carving ,and pen replaced feather, fountain pen replace pen, ball pen and pencil replaced both ink and fountain pen, typewriter tool place of writing by hand itslef, computers took over the place of typewriters,voice command took over, mind command will took over.. For the code lover i would like to say coding isn't going to go anywhere after it will be replaced. It will be be here and stay here it just not will be widely used same as we now dont widely use pen and typewriters but they still exist.

If you don't know how to code, how do you debug codes? Jensen Huang was just being facetious. He meant to say don't write codes, just debug them.

actually: learning right now programming is the best you can make. AI leverages your ability to do things, you can accomplish immense tasks with it. in 10 years, it may be different.

There are more than a thousand jobs offer for skilled software engineer on nvidia website. Finally, it looks like we still need them.

Very well said, and excellent takeaways and messages regarding Generative AI. We are all truly early explorers and as people learn to steel models and developers reinvent to the technology stacks of the future AI applications that will become commonplace, a new world of experiences will emerge, including new businesses, jobs, use cases, across nearly every field. What an amazing time to be alive with so many endless opportunities!

Computer and data scientist are still needed imo since the technology behind the AI revolution is powered by these. There is a lot opportunities for everyone to use AI indeed, but also new job opportunities for those who are not consumers, but familiar with the technology.

The prospect of prompt engineering certainly represents a significant direction for the future. Nonetheless, it is my professional view that a foundational understanding in the relevant knowledge domains is essential to crafting precise prompts that will facilitate automation and enhance efficiency.

9:31 - The Hubris when he talks about bio-engineering is scary. Like Jeff Goldblum's character, Dr. Ian Malcolm, in Jurassic Park says, _"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should"._ There is a clear line between intelligence and wisdom, and just because someone is very intelligent, doesn't mean they are wise. And if one doesn't tread carefully in the field of bio-engineering... it could go very wrong for the world.

I'm definitely a fan of this transition and looking to get AI Certifications.

Wellll, maybe. I have an experienced programmer friend who (at this time) generally doesn't use the AI tools in his purpose-built programming language. He believes (I can't say yes or no) that his code is generally more efficient, and it takes him less time to just write his own stuff. But he's been programming professionally for 20 years. I suspect that having an understanding of how computers do things (learning a programming language) will help you generate better code with AI, and (most importantly) be able to evaluate whether the code is good or bad.