@@khairiirfan102where can I watch it

@@princesssega4898 its on apple tv+ last time i check or rent it in amazon prime

Well, moon came out 12 years before Finch.. so first isn't necessarily wrong

@@bubdigli6756do i care no... are they both awsome yes and am i wrong yes

@@bubdigli6756 terminator 2 judgement day i forgot

It sounds like they did honor their contract end to the original Sam, just kept it going with clones.

well they did honor the contract end terms to the original Sam, just that they unethically create clones of him for their personal gains

Yeah I remember seeing short-term it was released

David bowies son

whats the movie name?

This is a really good one for sure

@@thelastzoe91It's just called Moon

The two movies share the director and might be set in the same universe. Not exactly what you'd call a follow-up.

@@jeremycarl2401 k

Lol fr

Personally I think being an astronaut with the technology we have right now is pretty crap. If it were Star Trek level or a little below that okay I'm down. But eating freeze dried food and no gravity living in a tiny little metal box that can be destroyed at any second no thank you.

​​​@@hotrodhunk7389and can get cancer easily. it ain't worth the risk, time, and money. they know they can do better, but their budget is higher this year compared to when it was during the moon landing except, it's been divided over other projects and I don't think it has as much for the moon landing with people on it again. there is a new battle for going to Venus and so far, one space company has the funding and plans to go to Venus.

Who said they werent

For all we know it does happen

I've appreciated him since The Green Mile... he played a bad guy..perfectly, the kind you love to hate

He's really great

to prevent copyright strike

Sounds like clones were already a thing, if they could be used unethically

They would just have to implant the knowledge and memories of the original Sam in each clone. This would create an instant worker with the knowledge and skills available to do the job required. It's much cheaper than training hundreds of different people.

@@azalago It doesn't explain the main problem, that you need to "grow" the first clones to an adult man out of nothing in just a few months on the Moon.

@@Furgettyu - I think this is where it says, "Hand Waving," in the script. A majority of the audience will accept it; "Well, it's clones, so yeah..." without knowing how cloning works.

@@douglasdavis8395 Yep, my brain always instantly searching for the logic behind. Maybe my fault 😂

It's only a great business model if this type of cloning technology is cheaper than "real" people. but realistically it would probably end up being too expensive and resource draining to justify. Also, it doesn't seem benifital to spend so much on an overly complex conspiracy strategy of cover-up clones when you could just use robots for the same tasks (and they clearly have access to advanced AI technology)

True as any company that would have the cloned would have patents on them.

Because u aRE a liar

​@@merlith4650 Exactly what was i thinking They can just automate the entire operation to save money

Yes true but he actually wanted to go back to earth to expose them not to live a normal life cuz he knows that’s impossible for him He just wanted to clone making to stop hence the plan to bring back the live feed with earth and to return to earth in the pod Truly we don’t jbje for sure wether or not the clone continued to live on or not but then regardless the movie was great and ended well exposing the company

It would plummet as the more ethical people sold their shares. Then the bastards would buy up the cheap shares.

@brettsymons604 I doubt that. At most "ethical" people would raise a debate over if a clone is a real person or just a copy of a real person. They don't want to go up there anymore than anyone else probably does

Looks like the Corp has a monopoly on the largest source of energy for the world. It's no use going to the police, they own the police and all world govs.

Similar to the island but not on the moon

Yep, that is the real hole in the plot, they implanted the most recent clone memories into the new one awakened to finish the "contract", that makes no sense, the corporation clearly have control on everything in the operation, didn't put security cameras or stopped observing them after 15 years of the plan going smoothlessly, it was a perfect slave loop for them, no one was checking on Sam or even knew who was working on the Moon, there was no need to continue this cycle, it should have just been restarted with the new one. The only explanations I can think of is that the old Sam had to finish prepping the station for the "contract" end, or there was some shipping to do and they couldn't alter it, so if they had awakened a "new contract" clone and it found the station as used by himself for 3 years it would have messed the plan. I haven't watched the movie so the only explanation to the hole is that in exchange for only needing 1 worker the station did need costant work in it to work, so leaving the old Sam for dead and keeping the new one released for a week would have caused too many problems to the corporaton.

To drive the plot forward

Accept it bro.😅

No more intro except they change😊

to tidy everything up so sams don't keep finding dead sams. Although you'd think they'd see each other when they're out harvesting anyway

@@jointgib If they have the resources and manpower to send in people every 3 years, they could have just sent a new employee anyway instead of having this elaborate operation going on, don't you think? lol

it's not a crater i'm willing to die on, lol@@Krenisphia

​@@Krenisphiawell, usually the dying clone gets in a 'cryo hub' to be sent 'home' but is in fact incinerated. Only reason the rescue team is coming is to remove the corpse that didn't unwittingly incinerate itself. Rescue team doesn't come every 3 years.

I also remember Sam's actor but i don't remember his name.

Nahhh , if anybody ever got to do this , that person would be dead in next few hours. .. Just like how that one scientist who invented fuel without using oil or gas , or like how those scientists who almost got the cure for cancer. .. Somehow their lab "accidentally caught fire"

@@weebhousewife lmao what are you on about there thousand of engine that do not use oil or gas its just that in the end there not as efficient and the fact that you talk about a "cure" to cancer show your lack of understanding on what cancer is you cannot cure cancer you can stop it but not cure it as its inertly a part of life

@@weebhousewife The guy who made fuel out of water was just a con artist. Think about it all our combustible fuels are hydro-carbon based. Sure you can get carbon basically for free, but there's no way to get the hydrogen for free your going to expend energy to get it. As for the cure for cancer... I'm mighty suspicious myself on that subject.

They explain it in great detail in the film. The floor is made out of metal and there are magnets in people's shoes.

​@@drmodestoesq Great detail is relative, I guess, as gravity affects everything else. For instance, items falling should fall more slowly, body movements more exaggeratedly pronounced for lower gravity, and other things, but it's probably difficult to effectively show it in a movie without CG.

More like oblivion...

"Oh wait killing employees is a trend now? Damn I'm late!"

Helium-3 is real...

Sam. From 2009.

Moon. It’s free on UKposts right now.