I’m surprised there’s no “Everyone survives this” when Thano’s army missies the base which had no defense

Steve returning the soul stone: Steve: hey. Red Skull: hey.

Gotta remember that before he was an avenger, hawkeye was a highly trained spy AND assassin for years with SHIELD. It’s totally possible that he could take out those yakuza by himself

on your left is a good scene. but i still think my favorite moment comes right before cap and the hammer. when Steve's shield is broken, he looks down at his arm and sees the massive gash and just tightens the straps to stay in the fight. if you had to sum up caps key character traits across the entirety of the MCU that scene does it perfectly

"Is that everyone?" "You wanted more?!" Yeah, but they're stuck with Fox and Netflix, sorry.

Falcon: the portals must be on his left Dr. Strange: why is that so impor- Falcon: *IT IS IMPORTANT*

14:55 Take a sin off! 2014 Nebula actually wraps her perfectly good hand in cloth to hide the fact that it is not burned. You see her unwrap it before she brings Thanos' ship through the portal before the Endgame Battle.

So.... The fact that Steve and Tony had a character arc from when they met that came full circle in this movie made me happy. Tone made the sacrifice, and Steve showed he was more than the super serum by lifting Mjolnir. That is damn good writing.

Plot twist: The stone never required a sacrifice. The Red Skull was just messing with everyone

Imagine sitting beside this guy in the movie theatre.

_“Alright the Gloves ready”_ Tony, Rocket and Professor Hulk are 3 scientific geniuses and each are shown here developing the gauntlet in a context related to their history in the MCU. *Rocket:* Found a way to extract the power stone from Ronin’s War Hammer - then he found a way to extract the reality stone from Jane, so he presides over the final fitting of the Stone’s into the Gauntlet. *Banner:* Joined the Avengers in the 1st place to help SHIELD with the tesseract (actually a concept in physics for a 4 dimensional object that can explain how the 4th dimension in space at right angles to the other 3 is *what we perceive as time.* ) because he is the world’s leading authority on gamma radiation which the space stone gives off. He is shown monitoring (containing?) the radiation given off by the stones from his computer. *Stark* Has Holographic tech that allows you to manipulate Nano bots and remotely handle objects and he is seen physically fitting the stones into the Gauntlet. Whole scene is like 2 seconds, but contains more science and logic than many entire SCI FI films do.

The Thanos not disappearing right away part got me rolling on the floor laughing. This guy a fool for real 🤣

Imagine Howard Stark's horror as he watched his child grow up to look exactly the same as Howard Potts.

Endgame was like: How are we going to get everyone back? The directors: Let’s slap some quantum physics on it

I am not a humongous fan of this movie because it's kinda confusing, but Steve's ending actually makes me happy, he got the life he always wanted

21:08 My best guess as to what's happening is because both the new gauntlet and Tony's suit are both his nanotech, he was able to move the stones over to his hand because they were touching and temporarily "merged" while Tony was pretending to struggle. He wasn't trying to take the gauntlet off of Thanos, he was buying time for the Nanotech to move the stones over.

You missed the biggest sin in this movie. Tony Stark says to his father: "No amount of money ever bought a second of time." WHILE LITERALLY TIME TRAVELLING!!!!

They honestly could make a whole ass movie about Steve returning the stones Edit- holy crap thanks for all of the likes everyone I hope Marvel decides to make this a movie!

Back in the day (almost 5 years earlier) some were asking how come the actress who plays Cassie Lang is so 'old'. Actually The actress Emma Furhmann (born Sept. 2001) was *16* at the time of shooting (which wrapped in January of 2018 making Emma 16 years 4 months old) - exactly the age of the character. Cassie Lang - born in 2007 - Snapp occurred in 2018 at the age of 11. She was not snapped. In 2023 Cassie is you guessed it ..... *16.* So the film is perfect with its casting in terms of age. This is ironic - because..... the actress has been replaced in Antman 3 by Kathryn Newton. She was born in 1997. Some thinks she looks younger but she is 4 years older than Furhmann. lol.

Endgame actually helped fill in plot holes from previous movies like how Hydra got ahold of the Mind Stone

It’s bullshit that he didn’t sin the part when everyone survive thanos Missiles

Fun fact: the rat that released Scott, wasn't CGI. that was a real, trained rat

*Steve Rogers vs. Superman* Steve Rogers: _I've been an underdog since the day I was born. I will fight for what's right against all odds._ Superman: _I have infinite plot armor and can't be beat._ 🤣 DC fans still a bit salty.

19:02 there is a sins reduction sound effect after Cap says assemble but the counter didn't change.

“Is that everyone?” No. The Netflix heroes couldn’t make it.

Everything Wrong With Avengers: Endgame Fans: There's Nothing Wrong, It's Perfect Jeremy: And This..Is...Cinema Sins *Snaps* *Ding*

At 81 it does the "Avengers assemble" thing. Then the sound of a sin removal. But there's no sin removal.

*5 years later - more people understand and accept that the time travel in this film is to multiple universes in the multiverse.* Understanding this should never have been a problem. The 1st time you saw Nebula 2023 kill Nebula 2014 .....and yet not die herself, ala Back to the Future......the question was answered. The two Nebula's are from different Universes - that's why 2023 Nebula doesn't die. How does that answer other time travel related questions? Think about it. If you accept that Nebula doesn't die when killing alternate self - then you accept that other Nebula is from a different Universe. If other Nebula is from a different Universe then *so were the stones - the Avengers went to gather from said Universe.* Now you've accepted - whether you admit it or not - that the stones come from different Universes.

"This is the best moment of the movie. This is why I'm taking five sins off. But I'm also giving five sins back almost immediately after"

That’s kinda my problem with Rhodes. He has no character development or arc he just makes a snarky one liner 4 times a movie and does nothing useful

6:11 he stopped you say, remember that between the snap and this movie, he designed 35 suits. 35 in 5 years. Yes, phase 2 Tony did better with 35 suits in about a year. But still.

Biggest sin: Cap never said his awesome, "I can do this all day," after Thanos smashed him. Why did they forget that? It's his motto!

"Rando pop culture references don't ALWAYS equate to comedy" Look who's talking

I'm legitimately surprised there was no "They survive this" sin after Thanos's battleship blows the hell out of their base

I'm 3 years late but a sin you missed was a cgi mistake. When scott was given a taco by hulk-bruce, in the first shot hulk had two tacos in his hand, but in the next he only had 1.

at 4:17 - the names are listed horizontally in rows not vertically in columns, so they are in alphabetical order.

Cinema sins: “Ok, fine movie have a sin back” at the cap hammer scene Me: *”Lowers gun”*

“Rando pop culture references don’t always equate to comedy” You’re one to talk

Thanks to this video. I'm rewatching Infinity War and End Game starting right....... now...

*Character driven storytelling* The reason that Cap wielding the hammer is such a cool moment is because there’s much more to it - than a ‘cool’ moment. Zack Synder for example is good at ‘cool’ moments but they are also empty - and have no context or substance beyound titillating 11 year old boys. We saw in Age of Ultron that Cap could budge the hammer but not quite move it. This created a mystery, that goes to the core of how you see the characters and what makes you think of a character as worthy. Thor watched Cap with a bit of concern - which in turn indicated that the God might potentially be jealous of a mortal, who might be just as worthy as Thor. Why would Thor even care? Maybe because the whole reason his father put the enchantment on the hammer - was to question Thor’s character - and to remind Thor that self entitlement of Godhood is *no substitute* for content of character. But there’s more. Is Cap actually worthy? In Winter Soldier he finds out the terrible truth that Bucky murdered Iron Man’s parents - but he hid this from Tony. A ‘lie’ that came back to haunt him as it resulted in the break up of the Avengers. Only after coming clean with Tony - admitting that he knew what Bucky had done and concealed it, can Cap be truly honorable to his own moral standards and not a hypocrite. Thor meanwhile traveled on a downward spiraling journey that reaches one low point - when he pauses to announce his prideful vengeance against Thanos - only to realize that he had avenged nothing. “You should have gone for the head!” But that’s not Thor’s breaking point.....the breaking point occurs when *he does go for the head* but it’s too late. This isn’t revenge. It’s just futility and failure. Thanos has completed his mission, ‘destroyed’ the stones to remove temptation - and died by hand of Thor - just as Thanos foresaw - and effectively commanded Thor to do in Endgame. Making his inevitable victory now as complete as Thor’s failure. When in Endgame Thor is about to be killed by Thanos, and Cap picks up the hammer, all the change and growth of the characters now reaches a point of payoff. Thor - is no longer driven by ego. He can both accept Cap’s worthiness and admit that he needs the help of the mortal to vanquish this foe. it’s no just longer about *him.* Captain America - is not attempting to lift the hammer in a prideful act of machismo, he is doing so to save Thor and everyone else’s life. Thor does not put his thumb on the scale to stop Cap from lifting the hammer - he now shares his power with his friends, just as he did earlier with Iron Man. “I knew it.” Character driven story telling, not just mindless action scenes. Another reason why Endgame is a great film.

“Directors accidentally film Paul Rudd talking about his own life and put it in the movie” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

"Temporal manipulations can create branches in time. Unstable dimensional openings. Paradoxes! Time loops! You wanna get stuck reliving the same moment over and over forever or never having existed at all?" - Mordo If you took the time stone from Tony and turned back time on him - you'd create a time loop, but Tony would still be dead. You take the stone, turn back time, stone goes back to Tony, take stone, turn back time...... [he's still dead] It's just an error of logic some fans don't want to accept of course because they don't want Tony to be dead.

Disney+ could make a 6 ep series of each stone Steve returns

The biggest sin on the "girl power" moment for me is that wasp is there too. Isn't she supposed to be helping Scott fix the van? 😂

I’ve watched this movie probably 5 or six times outside of this video. And the Avengers Assemble line still gives me the chills

*Yes Tony can wield the gauntlet - no Captain Marvel can't. Here is why:* The Infinity Gauntlet is body, mind and soul, connected to space time and reality. This means that *if* you are strong enough in body mind and soul to bear the gauntlet then you can command the Universe. The most powerful limiting factor is clearly the soul stone. Its uniqueness is explained by the Demon Red Skull in Infinity War. In order to harness its power you *must* sacrifice the soul of someone that you love. It's an everlasting exchange. Thanos sacrifices his daughter Gamora - likely the only person in the universe he loves. Banner sacrifices Natasha. Tony -> *sacrifices himself* -> He willingly gives himself to the soul stone. In exchange for ridding the Universe of Thanos. This is why the scene does not show him struggling while the power of the stones flows thru his body. That is the nature of sacrifice - to know - and to withstand - for something greater than yourself. Given this: *Of course Danvers couldn't have handled the stones.* No matter how powerful she might be. Physical power is *not* enough. This is not a problem that can be *overpowered.* The requirements are of body, mind and soul. (Danvers has physical power, but neither intellectual genius and more to the point - the spiritual connection via sacrifice to the soul stone) You must be able to *give* not take. That's actually the thesis of the film. Which is intelligent and unusual for these kinds of films, and that is why some did not get it. They are still on comix 101 level and don't know why Superman doesn't punch the problem in the face. lol

Tony being funny and then angry 2 seconds later is actually pretty realistic for someone still processing what happened.

18:45 "Is that everyone?" "You wanted more?!" "Well, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, Daredevil, the Punisher, and Quake might all come in handy if we need some help."

21:26 something tells me that Tony made them turn into dust on purpose as payback for five years prior.

The Antman crawling in Thanos thing was explained in Guardians of the Galaxy. He is just as tough on the inside as he is on the outside. Sure he would probably die, but they would just grow and conform to the inside of his skull. They would die an absolutely brutal death.

I’m so glad you mentioned how equally awful it would be to bring back everyone 5 years later

When Hulk punched the elevator door after he was told he couldn't enter, how did the lift not get stuck?

*Iron Man Becomes First MCU Film Inducted into National Film Registry* The key to Iron Man is the conception of his character by RDJ and Feige. _When he announced _*_I Am IronMan_* - this meant comic book conventions of secret identities were being abandoned for the sake of *filmmaking.* A film is actors communicating character and creating the illusion for the audience. Comic books *have no actors.* They are drawn. The comic book is the artist's *drawings* which communicate meaning. They are two completely different forms of art and you cannot 'paste' one onto the other. Allowing the actors to unmask was the stroke of genius that Feige and RDJ figured out. There are virtually no secret identities in the MCU. When Gwyneth Paltrow tells Tony _you can rest now_ the audience is weeping (i witnessed this multiple time in the theaters - everyone but me, right 😉) it's because RDJ has created a character that the audience cares about. It's this - *not the CGI* - not the super powers that actually makes the audience care. The great Kirk Douglas (Hank Pym's dad, for you kids) , said _the actor doesn't get caught in the illusion, the actor CREATES the illusion and the audience gets caught up in it._ Still today....does DCU understand this? Nope. Does the Star Wars Universe get it, how about James Cameron who seems always so impressed with himself? No - he - doesn't. He still thinks its the spectacle that makes a film great, and you don't need actors, story, dialogue and meaning. Iron Man's place in Cinema history is well earned.

"Imagine they send Rhody and Scott to get the soul stone". LoL 🤣🤣🤣 I'm dead

Endgame: exists Cinema sins: finally a worthy opponent. Our battle will be lengendary!

oh my god old captain America looks exactly like joe biden

It has been bugging me, since you always refer to it, but Tony Stark DID NOT solve time travel in 1 night. Multiple reasons: 1. We do not know how long he was working on it prior to Cap, Nat and Scott showing up. There is a clear implication that he was playing around with time travel. And 2. We do not know how much time has passed from when Cap and crew leave and when Tony solves the problem. All we saw was Tony washing the dishes, looking at the pic of Peter, and putting Morgan to bed. For all we know, weeks could have passed, as seen when Hulk and Scott are trying out their solution, they had to construct the computer systems, the cables, and write the programs.

You took back Sins for EVRYTHING that needed sins taken back for. I'm glad you felt what I felt when I watched this movie.

Dr. Strange: "Is that everyone?" Everyone from the Netflix shows: *Am I a joke to you?*

fun fact: some candles are used for smelling good, not light

“Why is there all this trash with half the population missing?” That’s just how San Francisco always looks.

_In Infinity War, how did Thor know to come back straight to Wakanda?_ He brought the pod back from NoWhere- so either he traveled back to earth with Rocket and Groot in the Pod, or……he used the Bifrost and brought the Pod back to earth, and then tracked the alien Invasion to Wakanda. (Since he doesn’t have the pod with him in Wakanda) Note: No matter which version of events you choose - there is *no exposition* for it, because it’s boring. You want to see Thor’s dramatic intro. Not him going thru the process of finding out what’s going on - on Earth and where everyone is at…when we are watching the battle and the heroes are losing. Likewise: _If the Guardians ship is out of fuel……how do they then use it to travel to the Planet to confront Thanos?_ Once the ship is back on earth, then they have access to at least 3 sources of space fuel from Cosmic characters 1)- Danvers who is/was a member of Kree Star/Force (the Guardians ship is a Kree ship). 2) Rocket who has the Pod - that Thor brought back, and access to intersteller communications - which he used to track Thanos location. 3) Thor, who has the bifrost and can go anywhere and get anything. You want to see the Avengers go after Thanos. You don’t want to see them refueling the ship, or making plans for what they will do when they get there. Exposition should only exist to explain things that cannot otherwise be explained. A good example is - you do need some explanation for guns in action films w/unlimited supply of bullets. 😂 But you don’t need to see in that same movie, the car stop for gas. lol 😂 Filmmaking 101.

I get it now. Someone has taken a stone at the beginning of 2020

Fun fact: That one scene of Natalie Portman is actually a deleted scene from Thor: The Dark World.

We finally know why Captain Marvel never heard of Thanos' hunt. She was busy singing and getting married.

20:10 There is a show called "Invincible" Watch it, sin it, look it up, I don't care just find the scene where Shrinking Ray "dies" and you will remove that sin faster than the writers explaining the time travel.

"Thanos destroys the stones after using them to balance the universe, yet the 'ancient one' says that with a single stone removed it branches that timeline into a unimaginable darkness. So Thanos actually doomed the MCU to an unimaginable darkness, but this isn't mentioned or even taken seriously by anyone including Banner who got the explanation." Ding

Thanos: I am inevitable. Cinemasins: So are we.

YOU MISSED ONE! If nice nebula only had one pym particle jar thing to get back to our time, and evil Nebula used it to get to our time, how did Thanos’ ship get small enough to get in the quantum realm???

An unending amount of sins for you sir, for failing to take AT LEAST one measly sin off for Stark saying "And I.. am.. Iron Man".

Cinimacins: " pop culture references aren't comedy" The second sin is a pop culture references we weren't 1 minute into the video darn it

Does anyone else just watch CinemaSins to watch movies u like again but quickly

Funny how someone so meticulous didn't even notice that Nebula wrapped her arm in gauze to disguise it. Sins on you buddy!

I’d like to sin cinema sins for assuming tony knew about hanks work simply cause tony is super smart and not considering the fact that that tony probably did some research on hanks work beforehand

Honestly, this is a lot less sins than I expected for a major blockbuster

That one single scene with Natalie Portman was actually a deleted scene from Thor 2, they just decided to use it in this movie. So Natalie Portman actually didn't do any filming for this movie. Just a fun fact 🙂

_The problem with moving backwards in time is that people forget about the other side of the coin. It’s a space Time Machine, you have to move in space as well as time._ - Neil deGrasse Tyson Avengers Endgame - which had physicist consultants is one of the few time travel films that understands this - at all, and deserves credit for it. Problem is - the science challenged knuckle brains on this site, are like… wha???? 😵‍💫

3:09 it should be said: obviously having the text take a while to finish revealing puts a little perspective into just how much time is being passed

You forgot "They survive this" when Thanos blows up the compound

Red Skull being the one overseeing the Soul stone makes so much sense. The stone requires you to sacrifice something that you love to obtain. Red Skull has never loved anything, therefor has nothing to sacrifice, making him the perfect overseer of the stone. I love it.

2:25 "All Nebula knew was the garden" Wrong. She knew that Thanos intended to 'retire' after the snap and exactly where he was going. Hence the joke by Rhodes: _Thanos has a retirement plan._ Rocket knew there was a spectacular energy surge - implicitly unlike anything naturally occurring. The result of both items of information suggest that Thanos would be there. Try not to make the mistake - that so many make and give the characters information they don't have. *They don't know the energy surge means Thanos destroys the stones.* They think he still has them, which means he can be anywhere in the Universe. It's really *Nebula* who knew the whole time exactly where he was- Rocket is only providing the confirming evidence. Nebula knows *because Thanos told her* - so now *she tells us.* Lol. Just have to pay attention. Also you have to think: *Why didn't Nebula just tell them earlier??* Why does she tell them - only now? There is an answer - in the film - *if you are smart enough to follow a story and understand character motivation.* So I will wait and give you a chance to think about it.......

*Director of Marvels - on ‘that scene’ in Endgame.* _"I, like many women around the world, watched Avengers: Endgame and had that six seconds of all the Marvel women together," she explained. "And at once I had chills, but I was also very annoyed. I was like 'Two hours of this, please.”_ Oh, don’t worry Nia. The folks who *hated* this 6 second scene…will hate all 2 hours of your upcoming film, for the same reason. 😂

You missed a sin: when all the Avengers emerged from portals and the camera shows a wide shot of their army, you can see Cap with an intact unbroken shield.

"Is there a spare rat around, to fire that shit up?" comic gold, can't stop laughing....

How did everybody hear cap WHISPER ASSEMBLE?

One question , what happened to loki? This timelines does not make sense ... They took back whatever was in the past so they don't change it but they did change it by interferencing so how does it work?

They killed him properly this time and 5 years was like 5 hours and tony is..iron Man

The shot where Steve is slowly walking towards Thanos and his giant army all alone, injured with a broken shield is just awesome.

"We're the Avengers not the PREvengers." Captain Marvel in Civil War 2: "Um actually"

You know you've done something right when even heart of stone, cinemasins guy Jeremy is moved by your ending

I literally had chills when i heard the sound from the movie contact (1992) "let me go" You need to do a cinemasins video of that movie

Missed Sin: At 2h22m, we see Scott and Hope trying to start the van, but a minute later while Black Panther makes his run we see Giant Man trying to shove a Leviathan through a Doctor Strange hole. Also, This movie contains no Luis. The movie is 3 hours long. Nobody would've been disappointed with a quick montage of Luis filling in Scott over what he missed.

“Where’s Nat?” “She fell” 😂😂😂

12:15 _It seems like the main issue isn’t branch realities - but that this timeline wouldn’t have a timestone anymore?_ [ding] It seems like this is simply your trying to understand what is happening - so what is the ding for? Trying to make sense of what you’re saying [never easy] could be you’re implying that you don’t see why branch realities are an issue? The answer is - the 3rd act of the film. Because Thanos found out - he created a branch reality. The consequence of which is that he traveled to the future to attack the Avengers in this timeline. He came within a whisker of defeating the Avengers - AGAIN, and his plan would have then eliminated from the Avengers all memory of what happened. So yeah - CinemaSins…..that is a problem.

Watching Hawkeye and Black Widow fight over who will sacrifice themselves got me a little misty eyed....❤️

In "Far From Home", we see the reverse snap makes people come back exactly where they died. So...if people were having sex... oh that's awkward

18:01 Portals are opening - 5 sins off 19:03 Avengers Assemble - 5 sins added "CinemaSins changes mind cliche" *ding*

No one has EVER mentioned that ant man drove from San Francisco to New York in that van

Dialogue vs. Exposition - for CinemaSins. Dialogue - characters speak to ‘each other.’ They express and reflect unique voices and personalities and motivations and psychologies. By indirection this imparts the film’s meaning. Exposition - Actor is really talking to the ‘audience’ explaining what is happening on screen, usually because the filmmaking cannot show or does not trust you to comprehend the indirect aspects of dialogue. There are key moments of Endgame which are dialogue but CinemaSins wants exposition - as simpletons will. Examples: ⬇️

I ABSOLUTELY want to see a new Disney+ series about Cap's adventures putting the stones back. Tell me that wouldn't be a hit.