Right! For those in the past, going to the future(the quick way) makes no sense. In all likelihood, we'd just thank the future people for the heads up and then proceed to prevent that future from ever happening. Actually, in this world of skeptics and conspiracy theorist, there is no guarantee that a warning by people from the future would even be heeded.

then tell them If they try to NOPE out, they'll be Imprisoned

@@NutEmperor Lol Prison it is! With a 20% survival rate, the people on the beaches of Normandy had better odds. And a much better reason for being there.

No shit

It makes sense in this movies context. They only draft those people who were going to die soon anyway, people who if they were taken out of the timeline, wouldn’t affect anything in the future.

One thing that struck me as _truly_ stupid is the design of the arm thingy. Specifically, it comes too far up on along your wrist, which means that trying to _bend_ your wrist (by itself, not with your _other_ hand) would be painful. So why would you cause 'your' troops (easily avoidable) pain? Do you want them to be effective or not?! Also, for me personally, if they had given me a _choice_ about helping out or not, I would've chosen to help, but if they'd given me _zero choice_ about it, when they sent me into the future, I'd be shooting _them_ instead of the aliens.

He forgot Terminator.

They forgot "the great wall"

Yes! That should've been some sins off because that felt so real, hahahaha.

I’d be doing that frfr

Now the songs stuck in my head

Shit joke.. Good song.

No. A seven nation army couldn't hold back the white spikes.

How tf did you comment 14 hours ago?

Got a chuckle outta me

Or if the missing parent means they lose their home, starve, don't get the support to be a scientist, ordon't have kids of their own that will be young soldiers, or...

That's not how time works. I've listened to quite a bit of lectures by the top in the field rn. Everything is happening at all times. You already were born, are being born, and are not Born rn. We experience time like a string in the ocean. We only know the PA of the string, but the ocean still exists. Sowhen they go into the future that exists, and die there, any potential kids of those people exist still. How that works is because dimension. Each reality has a set of identical dimensions inside of them. Pockets of reality each universe sits in. We could have up to 20 from what some professionals believe. But essentially time travel would be between these pockets in our reality with the way we perceive them. Bit since we cannot actually comprehend on an intimate level what and how time and reality work at the moment it is simpler to say this. They are two trains (dimensions) running on the same track in the same moment. But they synchronize in a way that stops them from having issues occupying the same space. The parent dying would make it so that don't have a kid in their dimension. But in their reality they can still have that continuity. Which it does exist since the child they will never have due to them dying early is able to watch them die in their dimension. Most paradoxes we face don't actually exist. If I go into the past and tamper, my future will change but it will never be my past. I will have been in my future though I perceive it as the past. Everything is happening all at once. So, how my life turned out will be how it turns out since I existed and did what I did in my past before I was born. That doesn't stop the evens. It's how they are suppose to go. So if someone went back in time to kill Hitler, we wouldn't know.

@@p.a.w.sthetravelinggamer6750 and of course the Top experts have travelled through time and can be sure this is correct. I assume it is Dr. Brown and Professor Thawne?

@@p.a.w.sthetravelinggamer6750 Given that no one has ever managed to time travel and there are no hard facts, that's a conjecture not a proven fact

@@p.a.w.sthetravelinggamer6750I have name to answer your manifesto, novikov self-consistency principle

haha. CinemaSins has definitely changed the way I look at movies now ahah.

@@aurelius7778 I was watching Spy yesterday and went "In case the reckless driving and the s-ual comments this guy makes weren't enough, lets have him steal an apple from a person who sells apples for a living, and eat it, to further emphasise the fact that this guy is an AH" Hahaha. i just cant stop.

@@fadedslinky1185 hahah. That apple point has broken the window and now I know what character is what even though we're only 5 min into the movie haha. Matter of fact I think some Hollywood exc really do watch his channel because they changed the way the do Title cards now and set locations lol.

Movie logic, all ammo works in all weapons. 😂

Obviously he was stockpiling them in case there was a tough boss fight later on.

After 30 years the best they have in terms of guns are the ones supplied in the current timeline. Ok.......

@@markvandoren3387 To be fair, firearms have barely advanced in the last 30 years to today. There's only so much you can do with a system that shoots bullets from your hands into the enemy.

Or the most glaring problem: facing aliens without telling your troops what they will face or preparing them ahead of time. No wonder they lost the war.

“Friggin’ Bonies!!!”

Shit shit shit Shit shit shit Shit shit shit Shit shit shit Shit shit shit Shit shit shit 100% would be me lol

I have to disagree, it's a stupid idea to begin with. They have time travel and chose to do the stupidest thing possible with it

pretty much all wars are fought in an idiotic way.

The premise of this movie is not sound at all it is ridiculous. Past earth would never go along with future earth's stupid plan. If I remember correctly future earth's population was reduced to 5-10% because of the white spikes. Why would they think past earth would be able to do any better.

pretty sure any 12 year old could make a great breakdown on why using this method to fight the war is idiotic

@@teddy3657 Exactly! It's like stealing from your ancestors to feed your non-existent future children.

He’s 5% flying squirrel

@@Tom-bp6no he used the cartoon feather flap

"The Jumplink doesn't work that way" That's all you get.

@@CopShowGuyit’s wild that they were still able to send people back though. It seems like even just sending back info about technology would be a better plan.

@@CopShowGuyThey said it doesn’t allow them to arrive at an earlier point in the war, presumably only going between two specific points in time However they’re still in the past, before the war started, and are able to prevent it from happening in the first place or at least be better prepared for when it starts

But then you'd have the (far superior) show "Travelers."

You can ask all sorts of questions like this *note that I wrotethis before watching the video,*, which is why I honestly think this may be the stupidest movie ever. Anyone who is sent through time still affects events later in the timeline. This means that if he dies after being sent to the future but without being returned to the past, a literal time paradox is caused because it means he changed events time periods in which he did not exist. They thought the guys from past could fight in a war because they played video games? Ignoring the fact that not all video games involve guns, and not everyone these days plays video games, shooting in a game is not the same as in real life, where there are a lot more factors to consider. Video games are also a safe activity, whereas in a war, you are in constant danger. My father, who was a soldier, had this to say: "if I saw aliens like that, I would shit my pants!" Imagine how the conscripts, most of whom have no combat experience would react to the aliens. Most of the time travelers have no combat experience, yet they have no trouble using their guns with no training. It would have been funny, logical and in character for them to ask rookie questions like " which end do I point at the enemies? "Why is my scope not showing the remaining bullets?" "How do I put bullets in the gun?" This would have humanized them and given some logic to an insanely retarded story. No one thought to investigate the area in which the aliens first attacked, or thought of covering it with weapons in order to fight them as quickly as possible? No one asked how these creatures, which by all appearances were mindless animals, were able to travel through space? No one thought maybe they had a different home? Why send the warning through time to an event as public and popular as the Super Bowl? You want to keep this kind of information quiet to avoid a mass panic.

hes not obsessing about his grown up daughter. he wants a world were she has future were humanity doesnt go extinct. pretty distinct and easily noticed

​@@nomercyinc6783ah yes, comming back for future version of his daughter, that is where useless obsession exist.

"Time travel, it'll fry you brain like an agg" - Looper.

how many youtubers are in control of your opinions exactly?

@@racismwillsaveusallI take it you’re one of the writers for this horrible movie.

Best version and the original film is the first.

I know!!!!

I don’t know why but I really enjoyed this film 😂

​@@afroshinobimikeemikee2208I watched it during lockdown so it was something to do.

​@@afroshinobimikeemikee2208 i couldnt even finish it. 😂 an hour and i gave up. like what he just said, they died so easily by bombing so how the hell did they lose. even normal rifles can kill them. so wtf.. and why would they bother making toxin if they could just use guns to kill the female. thats where i left

@@afroshinobimikeemikee2208 I don’t think anyone expected something other than dumb fun monster movie at least I did so I was just pleasantly surprised mostly with the creature design

Yes, F-22s can drop bombs, they have a package for that. But you are correct about landing on a carrier. But that is assuming there are no land bases left.

@@LancerX916 There would be no reason to have F-22’s left in that world specifically with that package. There are many planes better suited for bombing, especially when fighting any enemy that had no anti-air capability. Also, I said most likely. Seeing as the final base for humanity is on the ocean and how there probably aren’t any land bases near Miami, I was assuming a carrier launch.

I think they were f35s which can indeed drop bombs, they just aren't primarily intended for it.

@@imflikyt They were not F-35’s. They were definitely F-22’s. Also, the F-35 is a multirole stealth fighter, with one of its main roles being ground strike.

@@imflikyt it was f22. the "air intake" part is very pronounced, unlike an f35 which looks like horns if seen top view

The two films have much in common: zero sense and lots of fun.

J K Simmons is a national treasure!

@@Hunpecked Yes! Exactly! 😄

@@raydunakin I 100% agree!😄

I fw him cuz of Omni man

"The hold was loosening anyway, so he wasn't completely responsible for being an impulsive idiot that helped doom the universe". From a generous commenter on that scene.

@@motherplayer they almost had that Gauntlet off

Yea this really bugged me when watching the movie. One of the points made in the movie is that most in the future are young with little to no combat experience, so why not work with the past and share information on the enemy to people that have the experience. The past military would surely outfit their soldiers with better equipment to handle the white spikes if they knew info on them and came up with countermeasures to beat them.

I thought critics hated Renfield

This movie took place in 2022, the year the World Cup final was actually played in November.

especially the world cup which btw 2022 world cup started in Nov. which would explain the Christmas decorations

She also teleported in and some how was able to speak through the stadium sound system.

The Last one was in Winter. But since it was in qatar most ignored it.

​@@emergconmost?

They did obviously not recruit just from the people in the audience.

The fact they sent them with just M-4s with futuristic foregrips is laughable, considering they would know what they were up against already from the first future soldiers. would have mass-produced Tungsten-core smkh Super armor piercing rounds, (The Germans made them in WWII for their 8mm rifles) and then just shredded every single whitespike in the city.

Only by Back To The Future time travel rules. There are at least 2 other time travel theories. Deja Vu gives a decent example of another.

Not to mention they are well aware small arms are trash vs these things but aren't sending everyone in with 50 cal teams, or at least shotguns or a large calibre rifle.

Ah, one timeline using another as cannon fodder. Yeah, that would have been much more interesting.

Or a way distant past where mankind was basically wiped out by the aliens and set back 50,000 years in development.

Because they can't modify a hellfire missile to deploy napalm? All things considered, refitting a hellfire missile to turn it into a napalm bomb doesn't seem like the most difficult thing they have had to do in the future.

@@taoofjester4113no because it’s a missile not a bomb and also because the raptor doesn’t fire hellfires to begin with

Thank you too dicer ik ur not on this one much but ik you’re apart of the group, you too greg Thank you three for the podcast’s also

Hey maybe your life would be a little better if you didn't spend so much time watching UKposts mind you I should heed my own advice

Shotgun slugs, or something. Maybe explosive slugs, no wonder they are losing troops at such a rate.

Lol still watch it, cause its a very entertaining movie

How about BOTH... Because both would happen.

@@captain_context9991nah, that’s why I brought up the surface tension not being broken. Surface tension is what makes it feel like a body of water is a slab of concrete

@@BlaxkSun Yeah, not entirely. But it would be like landing on a non-Newtonian fluid. The water simply wouldnt have much time to go anywhere. But you would prefer water to concrete.

It doesn't even need to be broken. Even at full tension water has nothing on concrete. It's a shame a myth so thoroughly busted is still being propagated.

surface tension is a myth, its still a brick wall even if the water is moving

It's definitely one of my guilty pleasures

So you've not seen this or Its a wonderful life. Very clear.

Removing a sin for being real to life, adding a sin for reminding me of real life.

You wanna do a little research first, before you write something dumb on the internet for everyone to see?

@@MatBaconMC Alright professor, tell us how that isn't true

@@mattsgamesstreams6189 The surface tension of water isn't what makes it "as hard as cement" on impact, it's its incompressibility. Surface tension isn't some magic property of water that, that once you "break" it, suddenly all the water below becomes miraculously soft springy. It doesn't matter whether it's raining, or whether you throw a hammer at the surface, or whether you blow up a freaking bomb on the surface. If you're moving at a certain speed and you hit water, it still won't have enough time to move away from under you, and since water is not compressible, Newton's Third Law applies here. The water will exert as much force back at you as you're exerting on it, thus feeling like you're hitting a slab of concrete. But don't take my word for it. The MythBusters have already experimented on this, and this whole "break the surface tension" myth has been debunked already. Humbled enough, or do you need more?

​@@MatBaconMCquestion, I've seen cliff divers go with large rocks held before them make it just fine, is the rock kind of paving the way by soaking up that impact allowing the diver to enter the space where water is filling up? You're explanation was very good, but with what I've seen, there seems to be something that can circumvent the water tension.

@@dragonheart967 The reason fliff jumpers do that isn't really to break any "surface tension". They do that to 1. Gauge the depth of where they're jumping into, 2. To see if there are any obstacles (rocks, for example) they need to look out for where they land, and 3. To agitate the water below, making it easier to see when they're doing twists and flips in mid air, so they can time their landing right. It's also good to note, you'll see that cliff divers will try to minimize their surface area as much as possible when they land, by going in as a "point" (toes pointed/arms up and fingers pointed towards the water), straightening up as much as possible. This reduces the pressure, and thus impact from the water on landing, since there's less surface area on impact. Think of it as them "cutting through" the water on landing. It seems the fatal height, even with correct technique, for a jump into water is around 200ft, or 61m. 150ft is fatal about 90% of the time. But anything below that can still kill, depending on how you land. Even a drop from as little as 20ft (~6m) can still break bones, give you a concussion, and just overall cause damage. The highest cliff jump ever attempted is 58.5m, or around 191ft. The person who attempted it suffered ligament injuries, and a dislocated hip. You'll also see that for everyone who has attempted a high-altitude dive, usually 20m and above, they all come out of it injured in some way.

I thought the same, but also with that high speed of falling they would still die or at least break their bones by hitting the bottom of the pool.

I thought Mythbusters showed the break-surface-tension technique did not help?