It sounded spectacular that's for sure the audio was incredible

That would have been epic. Kind of like SN 4 only in the air?

I saw it

Elon turned it up to eleven.

Sn10 explodes moments after landing, they are trying to perfect the timing with sn11

When did he say it?

Vandenberg much? Bogus O.P. Fog is transparent to radar and telemetry.

Lol 😂 beware the fog

@@canberradogfarts Pretty sure he’s just joking around.

@@OtherTheDave It's one of those instances where someone couldn't tell that a joke was being told.

At leas it has landed on its legs, actually one leg...

2:49:07 Yuka Gets hit/Plant Gets Hit

384x288 resolution? Drunken bigfoot footage taken with a potato would look better.

@@hawthorne-kswg-cap Still better than nothing tho

haha thats unlucky, for sn9 we here had to stay awake till 3am also, i dont normally care about english errors, but you said today though twice and thats a bit annoying to read, fix it will ya

@@lemonandgaming6013 You must be the fun guy at parties.

@@squerlicious you should insult me in a more up to date manner, we are in a damn pandemic, thank you in advance

@@lemonandgaming6013 u do u baby cakes

Ruining ur 69 likes

Are they actually destroyed? I didn't wait for a damage report.

@@cryophile They stopped returning footage, not a great sign.

@@samburnes9389 hopefully it was just a connection that got severed

@@samburnes9389 u m =the p.

Yes i am thankful my lord jesus christ heard my prayers and saved the equipment. Praise jesus praise him. The devil will not tempt me with thoughts of japanese women dressed in cosplay outfits.

Thank you, I was

Thanks mate

Plus the boom in the audio happens almost immediately after engine ignition, meaning there wasn't enough time for it to hit the ground, unless the raptors ignited late which is unlikely.

no mind to wait two hours and the fog cleared and weather fine?

In fact, it did.

It really did seem to explode in the air, but then Elon tweeted, "At least the crater is in the right place." Maybe a big bulk of the falling wreckage damaged the landing pad?

@@LisaBowers That's true.

@@LisaBowers crater being in the right place could also just mean that it didn't hit anything critical

nosecone fell in nearly one piece, engine on fire during ascent blew up on landing burn ignition

crossing fingers now See you in 7 months when it lands

conspiracy theorists dont believe that Mars exist...

@@midwestnagyfa4648 it's been 7 months lol

@@ClearVod haha! Of course sn11 ended up landing on Earth. Not to say we're disappointed

I noticed the same thing. There was definitely fire above one of the engines (I think the leftmost from that view) but when they switched back it was gone. I also noticed one of the engines was running fuel-rich, a yellow flame instead of a blue one. But that fuel could have been engine parts and not methane.

@@silmarian watching the video the second I definitely agree about the flame color. I saw the flame on the plumbing when I first watched

@D R will be interesting to see, after all, the raptor is the first of its kind so it’ll have a lot to learn

It felt much longer when watching it live. There was silence on the SpaceX feed, silence on the NSF feed, just nothing.

@@shawnikins1111 ?

The stuff in the engine bay is designed to handle that. They haven't fixed it because it's not a problem.

@@Zebra_M Hate to belabor a point but stuff that shouldn't really happen in the first place can and often does have horribly unintended consequences in the end. Just sayin'. Been there, seen it, got the t-shirt, suffered the consequencces.

@@johnbaker537 After all, they fixed the fires which used to happen around the engines after Falcon 9s landed.

@@Zebra_M The very fact that the engine bay design is intended to mitigate a problem means that the problem does exist, and the efficacy of that mitigation needs to be considered as a remaining problem. It is not smart to assume something is fixed just because it has been addressed.

@@Zebra_M I may not be a rocket scientist (although I am an aerospace engineer with 30+ years experience) but the fire is supposed to come out of the end of those big bell nozzles. When it starts coming out of other places I would regard that as a Big Problem. The crew of Challenger would probably back me up on that one. The fact that everyone seems to be so blasé about it is disturbing.

It is more than a goof flight. If it didn't blow up on liftoff, it was a good one

@@muhammedsillah3363 righto on that one

I’m gonna edit it so it’s a little more understandable lol

That's what I think, maybe something went wrong and they chose to blow it up

@@antoniskyvellos6631 there were pieces of thermal blankets in really far north. Think something went wrong really high up. And they had to terminate low.

@@MonsieurDijon Oh so you say there is a chance that some pieces fell from the starship before the explosion. Interesting. I guess we will find out soon

Possibly gimbal failure requiring FTS activation, a couple of hundred meters up. Spontaneous explosion of rocket seems unlikely.

@@jonbong98 it was almost certainly the fts, but I don’t think it was gimbal error. You can see the engines gimbal out-ish right before startup. No need to jump to conclusions.

There was a problem with one of the Raptors which was replaced on Friday...

@@TraditionalAnglican That doesn’t seem to have helped very much...

The problem Friday was that there was too little fog

You really don't understand how a suicide burn works do you?

Look up the dunning kruger effect my guy

@@woofcaptain8212 Sure, but those starships keep on crashing nevertheless....

@@phoenixrising4573 I sure do though. And space X can crash all the ships they want but to my logical mind learning to walk before running is a better approach. Something about the starship vectoring vertical to horizontal back to vertical again upsets the engines and fuel tanks to where they fail repeatedly. These problems could have been sorted on a static test fire rig before several hugely expensive full starships were launched. But seeing as they are using your suicide burn from the off and it’s failing every time maybe another approach is needed because the starship carcasses are mounting up. When they succeed I will be first to congratulate them but until then why are my suggestions so far out you feel the need to attack them?

With every explosion the profits increase. Because that is what this is all about ...And nothing else. A scam.. . SpaceX is the R&D arm of NASA. Funded with our tax dollars. And NASA wants you to believe that they landed on the moon - really?

Maybe they are checking all the negative possibilities out...

Maybe they are checking out all negative possibilities.

I saw that too, I've seen fire on a lot of the other flights but sn9 and sn11 both looked different.

I’ve seen those fires around the upper section of the engines on just about every launch I’ve watched. Nobody seems overly concerned about it, but the failures keep on occurring.

@@markmywurdz3968 Me too but this one seemed to burn longer and had some sparks flying out as well. If you like at 2:16:55 right before they shutdown the first engine you can see one of the engines appears to be have a yellowish tint opposed to the blue it's supposed to have. Possibly burning fuel rich or components inside burning up?

@@miketeran1739 Several people have commented on a possible fuel ratio imbalance. I’m not enough of an expert on that side of things to offer any kind of insightful response, although I’d like to think that all the combustion occurs inside the engines. What does concern me is that these flames keep appearing in places where they are just not supposed to be. Unless there is some combustible material in those areas I can only wonder if something is leaking.

@@markmywurdz3968 I'm not an expert on the engines by any means. Have you seen flames like the big one that happened about 20 into flight before though? I haven't seen enough of the launches but it looked like a major leak possibly damage judging by the it being sustained for several seconds and sparks being present. I can't remember what previous flight it was but it burned some copper and that made it look green. That being said I wonder if some components are getting burned up?

So if that's the landing leg, it didn't collapse on itself. So it did explode in the air.

*unscheduled*

*bkbfhdjdbdxhjddjdbdndkdkdmmdkddk*

i don't think sn11 got completely blown to pieces after the explosion so a big chunk of it remained intact (?) although, i thought starship would start the landing burn not exactly over the pad but offset so the engines would bring it over the pad. maybe that means the explosion didn't happen immediately after ignition

@@yigit8411 I heard two bangs on one of the streams.

nosecone fell in nearly one piece, engine on fire during ascent blew up on landing burn ignition

@@yigit8411 nosecone fell in nearly one piece, engine on fire during ascent blew up on landing burn ignition

No it's still all property of SpaceX and you can't take it because it might be needed for the investigation into what happened by SpaceX and the faa

@@jamesminett9717 I know, bud. This was tongue in cheek

@@Bubbajo4378000 fair enough, sometimes it's hard to tell online

@@jamesminett9717 I hear ya there

It uses GPS and radar, neither of those are affected by Fog

Assembly in a freaking dust-storm the likely cause...I cannot believe the conditions they are putting these things together in.

@@imtheonevanhalen1557 ?

Win!

type of plant en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca

The plant

No