Fun Fact! The B-36 Wasn't Too Reliable

  Переглядів 1,166,556

Sporty's Pilot Shop

Sporty's Pilot Shop

2 місяці тому

КОМЕНТАРІ: 602
@imageeknotanerd9897
@imageeknotanerd9897 Місяць тому
saying "cooling issues" implies the engines were overheating, but the fires were actually due to the carburetors freezing, leading to uncontrolled fuel flow. The engines being effectively backwards meant the parts that are normally heated by hot air coming off the cylinders were instead being cooled by the air flowing from in front of the engine. I learned that from an Air Force veteran working at an air museum where they had one of those engines on display.
@cwheels01
@cwheels01 Місяць тому
You'd think a lot of people would be saying "hold up, this sounds like a bad idea"
@kugelblitz1557
@kugelblitz1557 Місяць тому
​@@cwheels01 yeah but I bet some engineer had an idea like "hey, maybe with the engines this way it would do X better..." And then some higher up grabbed onto it and held on for dear life even when the engineers tested it out and said "y'know, maybe it won't work as well as we thought and we should go back to the drawing board." Or the ever famous "we don't have time to go back to the drawing board on this, so fuck it we go with the design we have."
@murgyj6198
@murgyj6198 Місяць тому
​@@kugelblitz1557sounds like more military contracts 😂
@hotprop92
@hotprop92 Місяць тому
Sounds very plausible. The pusher config gave greater range less turbulent airflow over the wing, laminar flow. The military is always pushing the boundaries on what's possible because that's what the bad guys are going to be doing. Both engines on the P-38 were critical, not to see how many of our pilots they could kill but because it gave better performance that way.
@lokey5430
@lokey5430 Місяць тому
Why the heck didn’t they just turn them around
@tylerblocker2501
@tylerblocker2501 Місяць тому
My grandfather was a b-36 pilot he told me the best part was retiring it and switching to b52s
@chrishamilton8134
@chrishamilton8134 Місяць тому
I bet, . 😊
@fastone942
@fastone942 Місяць тому
B36 jet engines ran on Avgas the same fuel used by the rest of the piston engines, which was rare for a jet engine
@allied_forces_310
@allied_forces_310 Місяць тому
Did he ever mention about the B-47 Stratojets
@jadenantal1652
@jadenantal1652 26 днів тому
​@@fastone942 Interesting, did not know that thank you
23 дні тому
Lol that's funny!!!
@aidenlarson9911
@aidenlarson9911 Місяць тому
“The _____ was famous for reliability issues” could be used to describe about 95% of military equipment
@Bulogan
@Bulogan Місяць тому
😂 So true
@hughcopson1799
@hughcopson1799 Місяць тому
"Military-grade" means lowest bid! 😅
@TheBookofLab
@TheBookofLab Місяць тому
"Its only gotta work long enough to get there" 😅
@bobbybandz9194
@bobbybandz9194 Місяць тому
Get what you pay for 😅
@thetheatreorgan168
@thetheatreorgan168 Місяць тому
The B29s all fell out of the sky because their engines loved catching on fire They tried putting close to original enginrs on Doc but after realizing how much they suck, switched to connie-spec radials.
@thatww2nerd81
@thatww2nerd81 Місяць тому
"And two more unaccounted for." I like that this implies that two of the engines just fell off the aircraft.
@Cemi_Mhikku
@Cemi_Mhikku Місяць тому
Or the also-notorious wiring issues a lot of aircraft of the era had. "Gauges are on the fritz again"
@destructorinator
@destructorinator Місяць тому
Oh they didn't fall off, they grabbed the parachutes and jumped for it
@BCWasbrough
@BCWasbrough Місяць тому
"They are still there, but sight-seeing!"
@alexandersheridan2179
@alexandersheridan2179 22 дні тому
You can really feel the frustration and deprecation through that last slogan! 😂 Long past denial and bargaining, they had fully accepted it.
@silentblackhole
@silentblackhole 20 днів тому
That the joke... ?
@polar_baer
@polar_baer 2 місяці тому
From what I’m hearing, it made anything but peace!
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 2 місяці тому
Peace Faker
@dj.sauerkraut9022
@dj.sauerkraut9022 Місяць тому
piece maker
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu Місяць тому
@@dj.sauerkraut9022 Peace Taker.
@simonrabeder1599
@simonrabeder1599 Місяць тому
I love this comment
@andrebello4191
@andrebello4191 Місяць тому
It made peace because it didn't make it to the battlefield
@Alduins_Flame
@Alduins_Flame Місяць тому
2 turning, 2 burning, 2 choking, 2 smoking and 2 more unaccounted for, the unofficial slogan of the B-36 Edit: Jesus christ, can I get like 20 people to sub to mt channel? This has gotta be my most liked comment
@sternencolonel7328
@sternencolonel7328 Місяць тому
But this wasn't build by Boeing ? Right ?
@Alduins_Flame
@Alduins_Flame Місяць тому
@sternencolonel7328 No the "B" prefix is to signify its a bomber aircraft, the B-36 peacemaker was made by Consolidated Vultee, later Convair
@metatechnologist
@metatechnologist Місяць тому
People can now understand why the military was very eager to move on to the B52 successor and its reliability!
@davidtuttle7556
@davidtuttle7556 Місяць тому
​@@metatechnologistThe BUFF may live for ever.
@MrMaxymoo22
@MrMaxymoo22 Місяць тому
​@@davidtuttle7556a couple years ago I made a pile of landing gear bolts for those from original drawings stamped 1954. It'll never die.
@gregswank4912
@gregswank4912 Місяць тому
It never dropped a bomb in combat, so one could argue that it excelled at making peace.
@dalemcdenver7816
@dalemcdenver7816 22 дні тому
Peace with it's maker maybe, never knowing if this was it's last flight...
@Snek_1000
@Snek_1000 Місяць тому
“2 turning, 2 burning, 2 choking, 2 smoking and 2 more unaccounted for” had me rolling 😭😭
@MrPlab1780
@MrPlab1780 Місяць тому
My class in a nutshell. 💀
@narrativeless404
@narrativeless404 Місяць тому
XD Says a lot about our society lmao
@quentinking4351
@quentinking4351 Місяць тому
That B-36 is at the US Air Force Museum. Last time I was there, it was leaking oil. Still. Hasn't flown in decades.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 Місяць тому
The last B-36 flew in 1959.
@renierbarnard2999
@renierbarnard2999 Місяць тому
After all these years it is still giving problems And its been retired for 60+ years Amazing
@railworksamerica
@railworksamerica Місяць тому
Infinite oil glitch
@circeciernova1712
@circeciernova1712 23 дні тому
That's why the US kept that one
@OG-BIG-SHEPHERD.
@OG-BIG-SHEPHERD. 22 дні тому
You know there are more than one air force museums right?
@jonathonhass4178
@jonathonhass4178 Місяць тому
Had the engines been mounted the way the engines were designed, probably would’ve solved the reliability issue
@cisarovnajosefina4525
@cisarovnajosefina4525 Місяць тому
No way, insight they couldn't have had when it was made😮😮😮
@jonathonhass4178
@jonathonhass4178 Місяць тому
@@cisarovnajosefina4525 No “insight” needed. The engines were designed to be pullers, yet they were mounted to be pushers. Engineering math would show that engines designed to be pullers wouldn’t be anywhere near as productive or efficient if mounted as pushers.
@cisarovnajosefina4525
@cisarovnajosefina4525 Місяць тому
@@jonathonhass4178 and you think they didn't know that back then 🤨🤨
@jonathonhass4178
@jonathonhass4178 Місяць тому
@@cisarovnajosefina4525 More than likely, yes, yet decided to experiment anyway obviously. The wings would’ve needed to be redesigned to mount the pulling engines in a pull orientation, then all the work done to actually do this. Obviously this was decided to be too expensive as the B52’s were starting to come online and sinking money into both projects wouldn’t have made sense.
@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin
@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin Місяць тому
Somewhat. 28 cylinders per is still a loooooot of moving parts to expect much reliability. Jet engines were a much better choice when available-fewer moving parts, more power for the weight, etc.
@331Grabber
@331Grabber Місяць тому
One of the most impressive transition aircraft ever. Saw one when I was a kid. Hard to believe it can fly
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Місяць тому
Between the age of 3 and 5 I lived on Fairchild AFB (my dad was army Corp of engineers, in charge of runway construction) and I can tell you that they flew...with a thunderous roar. Our house was out at the end of officers row, about were they would break above house house top level. About 0500 5 days a week the whole wing took off.
@thomasmleahy6218
@thomasmleahy6218 Місяць тому
Where.
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Місяць тому
@@thomasmleahy6218 Fairchild AFB, about 15 miles west of Spokane Washington.
@memethief4113
@memethief4113 Місяць тому
@@cbmech2563bet you never needed an alarm! Probably had to adjust sleep schedule though
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Місяць тому
@@memethief4113 the only time it woke you up was when it was foggy and they didn't take off.
@buckeyeinmi9950
@buckeyeinmi9950 Місяць тому
Fun fact. The B-36 was especially unreliable in Alaska. Because the engines were in a pusher configuration, the arctic air getting into the intakes was NOT good for the aircraft. And may have lead to a broken arrow incident along the Pacific coast of canada.
@cl844
@cl844 Місяць тому
actually it was greenland not canada close but not canada and there is still missing nuke parts they never bothered to even try tk recover greenland got SACed
@Natediggetydog
@Natediggetydog Місяць тому
How the hell did a broken arrow incident occur in friendly territory?
@cl844
@cl844 Місяць тому
@@Natediggetydog its happend at least 4 times only twice in the usa rest were greenland an spain
@cl844
@cl844 Місяць тому
@@Natediggetydog like the movie what is more scary a singl lost nuke or that it has happend enought to give it a name
@Natediggetydog
@Natediggetydog Місяць тому
@@cl844 I think you have the wrong name, broken arrow is when a US military position gets overrun. It’s a request for all available support, and a status report all in one.
@marckcf9600
@marckcf9600 Місяць тому
Engineer: how many engines do you want me to attach to the aircraft? Director: yes
@KaylieRayne
@KaylieRayne 27 днів тому
I had an uncle who was a flight mechanic on the 36s. Use to tell stories of going in the fix the engines mid flight and stuff.
@ylstorage7085
@ylstorage7085 Місяць тому
"2 turning, 2 burning, 2 choking, 2 smoking and 2 more unaccounted for" "Sounds like a Kinky party, I m in" "It brings nuclear kaboom too" "Cool, is that some kinda Voldaka cocktail" "sure"
@Boop__Doop
@Boop__Doop Місяць тому
It even sometimes almost didnt catch on fire
@kibbs325
@kibbs325 Місяць тому
Legend has it they even sometimes made it off the runway
@skipthefox4858
@skipthefox4858 Місяць тому
I've heard rumors that one time they were actually able to get all the engines to start normally but i'm pretty sure that is just a tall tale
@BentleyTypeR
@BentleyTypeR 2 місяці тому
One of the more fun facts I've heard in a while
@Eggman0430_
@Eggman0430_ 2 місяці тому
The thing was a powered glider, like a rubber band engine on a paper airplane
@budwhite9591
@budwhite9591 29 днів тому
Rubber bands are more reliable
@jezzdogg6857
@jezzdogg6857 19 днів тому
​@@budwhite9591underrated comment lol
@theamaturepro
@theamaturepro Місяць тому
I knew a man who was a WWII aircraft mechanic. He mentioned this as well, but more than anything he despised the F4U Corsair, which is my favorite plane. Said they were the greatest fighter plane ever imagined, but the worst to work on. Every time they took off, he hoped they wouldn't run out of oil. They leaked all over with no hope of stopping it. But considering they were designed, built, and in the air during active wartime, it makes sense they would have been rushed. Incredible plane though
@stealthgaming2298
@stealthgaming2298 Місяць тому
I would love to see the b36 added to warthunder
@nippon19
@nippon19 Місяць тому
jsut to see it burning in the sky ?
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 Місяць тому
Of course, the B-36 was the most complex piece of machinery ever devised by Man up to that point! More complexity, running on the razor's edge of technology, of course there will be issues.
@SergyMilitaryRankings
@SergyMilitaryRankings Місяць тому
That's just nonsense it was an absolute failure that forced the development of a better bomber, and was fast obsolete when the Soviets invented the ICBM
@eustatic3832
@eustatic3832 Місяць тому
Even catches fire in the movies
@robertmatch6550
@robertmatch6550 2 місяці тому
Always wondered if they had separate fuel for the jet engines. Kinda expensive to burn high quality gas meant for the radials. On the other hand fuel management would be complex.
@MrWhite2222
@MrWhite2222 2 місяці тому
Oh absolutely had different fuel systems. Radials are 4 stroke and use high octane gasoline. Jets use kerosene, which is very similar to diesel fuel. Neither are compatible/ interchangeable with the other engine.
@pickle4332
@pickle4332 Місяць тому
@@MrWhite2222can’t turbine engines burn gasoline even if it’s terribly inefficient/damaging to the engine?
@MrWhite2222
@MrWhite2222 Місяць тому
@@pickle4332 so, looked it up more, and looks like jets "can" burn gasoline, BUT it will rapidly degrade the mechanical fuel systems most likely. Not so much the engine itself, but kerosene/diesel acts as a lubricant itself, while gasoline acts as a solvent which strips oil from parts. Possible with modifications? Probably. However, one of the greatest benefits of jet fuel (especially in combat situations) is that it doesn't burn easily in leaks or accidents. It's MUCH safer than gasoline.
@LOLHAMMER45678
@LOLHAMMER45678 Місяць тому
On a smaller bird it would, but on B-36? Adding extra dedicated JP tanks was a piece of cake. They had room to haul an entire RF-84 along too
@jalpat2272
@jalpat2272 Місяць тому
​@@MrWhite2222I know it was built during transition era but, why built a vehicle that needs two types of fuels and engineering.
@oriolesfan61
@oriolesfan61 Місяць тому
Jimmy Stewart had no problems with his
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Місяць тому
Yeah I've always wondered how they did that.....maybe camera tricks?
@oriolesfan61
@oriolesfan61 24 дні тому
@cbmech2563 the film was low key usaf propaganda so of course it never had failures
@Loli4lyf
@Loli4lyf Місяць тому
probably the most amount of engines for a single aircraft ever
@paulmryglod4802
@paulmryglod4802 Місяць тому
Spruce goose had 8 4460 engines, flew a little bit over the long beach harbor and that was all.
@JRHaley
@JRHaley Місяць тому
⁠The B-52 which is still operational also has eight engines. The B-36 had 10, the Dornier Do X had 12, and NASA had a solar powered unmanned aircraft named Helios HP01 with 14 motors.
@SergyMilitaryRankings
@SergyMilitaryRankings Місяць тому
When your engines are bad you need many
@F40M07
@F40M07 Місяць тому
**cries in B-36 fanatic**
@whisperingforest9909
@whisperingforest9909 21 день тому
I feel your pain
@BreandanAnraoi
@BreandanAnraoi Місяць тому
Peacemaker or Piecemaker? 😀
@vincentandhimi6990
@vincentandhimi6990 14 днів тому
First Peacemaker (Actual name is Peacemaker), now both
@ZEBEE0110
@ZEBEE0110 Місяць тому
Fun fact my great grandpa made that emblem😊 its cool to see it in more places than pictures my family has passed down (the strategic air command emblem) his name was Robert Thor Barnes. He won a contest and got to have his art as the emblem for the S.A.C. I didn't think much of it as a kid but I'm happy I got to learn about him as much as I did, we still have most of his old art collection. Man was an insane artist tbh
@BIGMANLOGJAM
@BIGMANLOGJAM Місяць тому
I was lucky enough to find myself in Dayton, OH for a work trip recently. We had about one hour left to see the Air Force Museum in this video, so we did a speed run in our work clothes. It’s truly massive and everyone that works there are amazing. They gave us great directions to see all the best parts and we were sweating by the end of it. Really glad we went!
@Hoshimaru57
@Hoshimaru57 22 дні тому
I want to go back and see the new experimental hangar. All the x-planes were off display when I went.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 днів тому
Is the XB-70 still there?
@brandonpeterman9964
@brandonpeterman9964 Місяць тому
Such a beautiful aircraft and such behemoth, it would be amazing to see one returned to airworthy status
@Veemon657
@Veemon657 Місяць тому
Buddy that thing wasn't air worthy when it was new
@deluxalpha4138
@deluxalpha4138 10 днів тому
@@Veemon657 Of course it was air worthy, it could up to a whole 15 feet of altitude before the engines caught fire
@fgrau7376
@fgrau7376 Місяць тому
Strategic Air Command with Jimmy Stewart is a great movie that featured so many beautiful scenes of the B-36 and the B-47 Worth Watching if you are an aviation lover
@earlwyss520
@earlwyss520 Місяць тому
Great film. Ever seen "Bombers B-52?" There is a scene in the film where they're demonstrating the B-52's CLASSIFIED ability to "crab" roll sideways.
@fgrau7376
@fgrau7376 Місяць тому
@@earlwyss520 No , I just ordered it new DVD on Amazon Thank you looking forward to watching it!!! By the way, I was reading the movie, Doctor Strange love and all the B-52 scenes the Air Force would not give them any access to an actual B-52 interior (still secret) to film that movie so the entire interior of the B-52 in Dr. Strangelove was completely made up and amazingly it was very accurate to the real B-52 .
@stevenslater2669
@stevenslater2669 17 днів тому
I worked with an engineer who always wore a B-36 tie tack. He never talked much about it other than to say he flew the B-36. And the story the younger engineers in his department told was that he flew the last operational B-36 to the Boneyard at Davis Monthan AFB.
@427Arbok
@427Arbok 24 дні тому
Who could've possibly imagined that an aircraft with *_10 separate engines_* might have some mechanical problems?
@Oak.bricks.creation
@Oak.bricks.creation 21 день тому
Oh, I love the Dayton, Air Force museum
@alanm.4298
@alanm.4298 22 дні тому
I can comfirm this. My dad was a USAAF & US Air Force pilot and flight instructor. He mostly flew B29, B50 and their tanker variants. But he and a crew were sent from England to N. Africa to retrieve a B36 back to England "for maintenance"... only to find out that just six of its ten engines were functional. They still were able to get it in the air and make the flight back. Of course, it wasn't "heavy" with a bomb load and might even have had a reduced fuel, since the distance was probably only about 1/4 the airplane's range when unloaded. With a 230 foot wingspan, the B36 was huge! In comparison, a B29 has 141 foot wingspan and over 50 feet less length. Although it was only 3 foot longer than the B52 that followed, the B36 had 45 foot wider wingspan! In fact, only five aircraft with greater wingspan than B36 have ever flown. Three of those were one-off experimental. The two that saw regular production and service were the Antonov AN124 (1982) and Airbus A380 (2005), which the B36 preceded by 36 and 61 years, respectively.
@andrewday3206
@andrewday3206 17 днів тому
The 44,000 pound bomb the T-12 Cloudmaker, the heaviest bomb ever made, could only be carried by the B-36 Peacemaker
@thedepression950
@thedepression950 20 днів тому
'' ah yes lets put the engines backwards. nothing can go wrong and we will look so original that we will get a rise''
@michaelalbert8474
@michaelalbert8474 20 днів тому
I love the slogans the GIs came up with. My time in was with one of the most diverse, talented, intelligent group of people I have ever been around. I wish I had one of our turnover logs just to admire the artwork inside. One of my coworkers had a photographic memory and could go to the grocery store and had his check (that is an archaic method we used to pay for things) before the cashier had rung up the total. And if the totals were different, he was right.
@robertttttt716
@robertttttt716 22 дні тому
My dad worked on them when he was in the Air Force he didn't particularly care for them. Air Force was all about getting air frames in the air and this thing was a beast to keep flying.
@alanhinkel420
@alanhinkel420 27 днів тому
I saw this aircraft at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum. Very cool aircraft. Thanks for the story.
@levidavid3099
@levidavid3099 7 днів тому
When I visited the US Air Force museum, I found this plane strange since it had two types of propulsion, but it was very interesting nonetheless. Glad to see other people interested too.
@Mythilt
@Mythilt 21 день тому
One of the buildings at Wright-Patt I worked in was used to do some material testing on the B-36. They had to do some flex testing on the wings of the plane, and since it would be easier to test the flex if the plane was upside down, they used a couple of cranes inside the building and actually flipped the plane over. There are photos of the work in the building lobby. (Bldg 65, the huge one just off the National Air Force Museum's old runway.)
@chipsaviation767
@chipsaviation767 17 днів тому
"this is the peace maker" Ohh okay "It's a bomber" What-
@Avideep_usapro2
@Avideep_usapro2 3 дні тому
There's a peacemaker, now we need a peacebreaker
@marvwatkins7029
@marvwatkins7029 Місяць тому
I'm a proud Sportys consumer.
@rakhafitra8607
@rakhafitra8607 Місяць тому
Curious on why they didn't just fully replace the prop with jets rather than this hybrid configuration. I guess a jet would jut cut the bomber's range?
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Місяць тому
Two reasons. One, the origins of the program were in 1941, when there was a possibility that we might need to hit Germany from the continental US and liberate the UK from invaders. Two, early model jets lacked reliability, power, and fuel efficiency. This is also why the B-52 had eight jet engines. The earlier B-47 had six, and apparently could be seriously underpowered at the time. They DID, in fact try to rebuild this thing into a jet bomber in the form of the YB-60... which had a high degree of parts commonality with the B-36, but also looked like Convair had copied Boeing's homework.
@LOLHAMMER45678
@LOLHAMMER45678 Місяць тому
The modification program would've cost a lot and the USAF wanted to save money for B-52
@Britcarjunkie
@Britcarjunkie Місяць тому
Convair DID build a prototype with all jet power and swept wings, but the USAF had already opted for the B-52.
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Місяць тому
@@Britcarjunkie the YB-60. The BUFF actually outperformed it, still.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 днів тому
They did in the competition that eventually went to the Boeing B-52. Look up the XB-60 for the 8 jet type.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 Місяць тому
Engineers in the piston engine age just never seemed to have got to grips with the problems of pusher propellor engines.
@SanDiegoHarry1
@SanDiegoHarry1 15 днів тому
a buddy of mine's father was B-36 gunner. Said the aircraft caught fire just about every flight.
@samnelson9038
@samnelson9038 Місяць тому
Awesome looking planes though
@hotprop92
@hotprop92 Місяць тому
The absolutely straining the leading edges of recip analog technology. I've heard it took 45 minutes from startup to ready for takeoff just to go through all the checklists. Probably the busiest person in front was the flight engineer, jeez just to monitor 336 spark plugs if they were firing properly etc etc etc. The aluminum cloud.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 днів тому
I think it was Magnesium cloud.
@hotprop92
@hotprop92 8 днів тому
@@GregWampler-xm8hv do you know the alloy used?
@t.r.campbell6585
@t.r.campbell6585 20 днів тому
There is a B 36 on display between Omaha and Lincoln, Nebraska along interstate 80. This B3 six is on display at the SAC Aerospace Museum.
@Airmanmanning.
@Airmanmanning. 2 місяці тому
I recognize that shield thats the strategic air command.
@690_5
@690_5 16 днів тому
my Grandfather, funny enough used to tell a story about when he was ATC for the RCAF. "Tower, we've lost an engine!" "Okay, you have any runway." "No, TOWER, WE LOST AN ENGINE." "Do you need emergency crews?" "TOWER, the F-ING THING FELL OFF." No idea when this was, but it always makes me laugh. I sure wish I could ask him which aircraft it was. RIP, Captain T.M.
@nrauhauser
@nrauhauser Місяць тому
That is the Strategic Air Command Museum at the Ashland, Nebraska exit about 20 minutes west of Omaha. There are about five acres of floor space, it's a great place to run a bunch of Cub Scouts ragged when the weather prohibits outside activity.
@kh40yr
@kh40yr 14 днів тому
Strategic Air Command - 1955 - Jimmy Stewart
@fixinggrace
@fixinggrace Місяць тому
The J 47 engines were also in the Boeing, 707
@mytmousemalibu
@mytmousemalibu Місяць тому
The 707 had J57's (JT3C) and then JT3D'S. It never had J47's they weren't powerful enough. The B-47 bomber had 6 of them as did the F-86 and a number of other early designs.
@electricpaisy6045
@electricpaisy6045 Місяць тому
Calling military equipment "peacemaker" is the most American thing ever.
@stormtroopertk4285
@stormtroopertk4285 22 дні тому
“We’ve lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire”
@AussieMapper1
@AussieMapper1 2 місяці тому
Reminded me of the buff when it was first made
@garymiedema642
@garymiedema642 2 місяці тому
The opposite of pusher is tractor, not puller.
@TreesandStuff69
@TreesandStuff69 Місяць тому
Tractors can't fly
@randomchannel323
@randomchannel323 Місяць тому
Convair: Yeah lets add 6 engines then 2 extra jet ones won't be too complicated at all
@Nevim1297
@Nevim1297 6 днів тому
Another fun fact: the B36 was so heavy convair thought of adding tracks as the landing gear before eventually just going back to normal wheels
@RedPepper1312
@RedPepper1312 Місяць тому
I LIVE BY THAT MUSEUM NO WAY
@geminijixon6899
@geminijixon6899 23 дні тому
I’ve talked to old timers who armed the ammunitions in this plane. Pretty wild what they did
@tylerbrooking7750
@tylerbrooking7750 Місяць тому
It's weird that I just went to that museum 2 weeks ago, saw that plane and just thought: expensive, heavy, and the thickest wing spars I have ever seen in my life
@Armored_Ariete
@Armored_Ariete Місяць тому
this the one in dayton?
@dougtaylor7724
@dougtaylor7724 22 дні тому
My cousin was a Tech Sgt assigned to a B36 wing. He volunteered for a crap assignment to get away from those beast and work on something else. He was almost assigned to a B52 wing but to sent to an assignment in the Philippines during Viet Nam. He told me he was done with bombers. 😂 But I have to admit, when we went to Dayton to the museum, the two planes I most wanted to see was a B36 and the Globemaster.
@centerfield6339
@centerfield6339 19 днів тому
They added more engines. Perfect.
@nolongerblocked6210
@nolongerblocked6210 18 днів тому
"Peace maker" ~ mission design 😂😂😂😂
@ghost_ship_supreme
@ghost_ship_supreme 24 дні тому
That second slogan was S tier
@YouDriveUSuccess
@YouDriveUSuccess Місяць тому
There would need to be extra crew members just to man the throttle levers! Talk about task saturation! I bet it was quite the experience to fly one when all 10 engines were running right!
@hossahunter22
@hossahunter22 Місяць тому
"how many engines should we put on the plane?" "yes"
@hossahunter22
@hossahunter22 Місяць тому
"and did you want those as props or jet engines?" "also yes"
@Randomfactsofwar
@Randomfactsofwar 24 дні тому
“None turning, all burning”
@briancrawford69
@briancrawford69 Місяць тому
They have one of these at Castle AFB museum in Atwater CA. I go up there on open cockpit days and this thing is massive inside and out
@marchess923
@marchess923 Місяць тому
B29s should have also been renamed "Firebirds".
@JenSalvatore21
@JenSalvatore21 2 місяці тому
Feels like it would be easier and cheaper to just flip the radial engines around to push instead of sticking four jet engines under the wings
@Khmtravelvlog
@Khmtravelvlog Місяць тому
Idk why the engineers didn't figure that out
@CarMake
@CarMake 9 днів тому
called the "peacemaker" because it made it to the battlefield in pieces lmao
@XimCines
@XimCines 17 днів тому
Peacemaker reliability issues, now I know why the name of that character was chosen.
@littledino1515
@littledino1515 2 місяці тому
Oh I wonder why the peacemaker wasn’t effective. It’s not like it’s powered by nearly 8 engines.
@John-qv5ux
@John-qv5ux Місяць тому
This argument would hold water... were it not for the fact that the B-52 is also an eight-engined aircraft.
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Місяць тому
​@John-qv5ux and if the R-4360 wasn't a great engine.
@John-qv5ux
@John-qv5ux Місяць тому
@@thomasgeorge4384 even on the B-29, this engine had no end of problems
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Місяць тому
@John-qv5ux the 4360 wasn't on the B-29, that was a Wright 3350 duplex cyclone. And yesthat engine had troubles. The Pratt and Whitney 4360 was on the B-50, C-97/Boeing 377, C-124, and many, many others, and served everywhere from tropic jungles to the arctic.
@John-qv5ux
@John-qv5ux Місяць тому
@@thomasgeorge4384 I am mistaken then
@luish.990
@luish.990 21 день тому
"This engine is build to pull." "Yeah lets make it push." What did they expect to happen?
@JimmySailor
@JimmySailor 26 днів тому
Yeah, every high performance pusher has the same problem. Actually when you look into the history of aircraft the most common reason for a promising new design to fail is a lack of proper heat management around the engine. This makes sense as engines at best deliver ~30% of their power to the shaft and the rest is heat.
@martykarr7058
@martykarr7058 Місяць тому
The B-36 was a stopgap compromise. Because it could fly from the US to the Soviet Union and back unrefulled, it replaced the B-29 which would have had to been stationed VERY CLOSE, probably Germany, to hit targets in the Soviet Union. And it was big enough to carry the HUGE atomic and nuclear weapons at that time. It held the line until more reliable and longer range jets were developed, such as the B-47 and the B-52.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 днів тому
Well actually it was originally spitballed to be able to make the round trip bomb run to Germany if England fell. In a very contentious competition the B-36 beat out the XB-49 flying wing. Jack Northrup always claimed the AF tried to force him to merge with then Convair the makers of the B-36. What ever transpired behind the scenes the AF was so pissed off they ordered all XB-49's destroyed and then destroyed all the tooling.
@patk8417
@patk8417 16 днів тому
The flight engineer didn't know what those two engines were doing for sure. Information overload maybe?
@DavidJones-me7yr
@DavidJones-me7yr 19 днів тому
I've heard that slogan before and it still makes me laugh!😮😂😂😊
@erictaylor5462
@erictaylor5462 Місяць тому
Complexity is inversely proportional to reliability. Anything that can go wrong will go wrong, and the more that can go wrong, the more likely something will.
@propnotch3466
@propnotch3466 21 день тому
A bathroom and shower are some of her tricks, two things you can't get in an f-86
@Michael-ch2ox
@Michael-ch2ox Місяць тому
Trust the crews to come up with some fun names for it.
@phayzyre1052
@phayzyre1052 Місяць тому
Seems to me like the cooling issues could have been a simple fix by way of adding ductwork. Of course, it would have involved some structural changes, redesign, analysis, etc. but it would not have been too much involved.
@tstahler5420
@tstahler5420 23 дні тому
Jimmy Stewart failed to mention that last bit of information. 😂
@ozzy7763
@ozzy7763 22 дні тому
That thing is unbelievably big in person !
@CommunistNugget
@CommunistNugget 19 днів тому
General Electric: Makes Kitchen Appliance General Electric Also: Makes plane/jet engines
@marksaunders1789
@marksaunders1789 Місяць тому
Not sure if people realised but the video clips hes showing is from a amazing 1955 film could strategic air command nearly all of the male actors we're real life veterans so which I like to call them real life superheroes highly recommend that film to anyone who loves planes
@chrismayer3919
@chrismayer3919 Місяць тому
If nothing else, she was an impressive-looking aircraft (even if her military engines weren’t the best in the world)
@cjford2217
@cjford2217 25 днів тому
These issues were simply a side-effect of giantism. The more equipment you have on board, the more opportunities for failure. If you have a boat with 6 outboard motors, you're 6 times as likely to have an engine failure as someone with a single engine boat. For what it was, the B36 was a colossal achievement of aviation technology. Never dropped a bomb in anger, but it still had the Ruskies sleeping with one eye open.
@newhailman
@newhailman 18 днів тому
Yeah, I used to have one. But the waste water dump switch kept getting jammed up so I traded it in for a B-52
@dylanzwering2255
@dylanzwering2255 26 днів тому
"That's a number I can live with, good landing boys who says penguins can't fly"
@TheNightlessFall
@TheNightlessFall Місяць тому
2 turning, 2 burming, 2 choking, 2 smoking- Oh just like my grand-father.
@DonVigaDeFierro
@DonVigaDeFierro 24 дні тому
Two turning, two burning, two choking, two smoking, two unaccounted for.
@Ben-zr4ho
@Ben-zr4ho 28 днів тому
"Does anyone have a spare... 300 spark plugs I can use?"
@joshuamorin2123
@joshuamorin2123 Місяць тому
It probably just needed more engines. Maybe a couple ram or scram engines to keep with the pattern of mixing and matching
@Clementinewoofwoof
@Clementinewoofwoof Місяць тому
God damn, old slogans are just so funny
Boeing B737 Landing | Girl Pilot Landing in Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport
5:01
Пескоструйный АППАРАТ! #shorts
01:00
Гараж 54
Переглядів 3,1 млн
Voloshyn - ЗУСИЛЛЯ (прем'єра треку 2024)
06:17
VOLOSHYN
Переглядів 485 тис.
Obscure Planes You've Never Heard of
11:38
Aircraft Adventures
Переглядів 129 тис.
How Tesla Reinvented The Electric Motor
15:11
The Tesla Space
Переглядів 55 тис.
The Future of Air Mobility: Lilium Jet || Electric VTOL Aircraft
5:31
ENGINEERS GALAXY
Переглядів 2,2 тис.
The Genius of Cycloidal Propellers: Future of Flight?
11:36
Ziroth
Переглядів 917 тис.
B-29 SuperFortress  Engine Start / Maintenance Check Flight
9:54
Was This The Most Dangerous Airliner Ever?
13:50
Mustard
Переглядів 5 млн
Turboprops vs Light Jets: Why Turboprops Are Superior
14:45
Dwaynes Aviation
Переглядів 131 тис.
CITATIONJ JET CJ1 - IFR FLIGHT and CROSSWIND LANDING!
11:40
Guido Warnecke
Переглядів 1,1 млн
When General Aviation was affordable
11:35
Pilots and propwash
Переглядів 135 тис.
С Какой Высоты Разобьётся NOKIA3310 ?!😳
0:43
Хомяк может разблокировать АЙФОН
0:14
Собиратель новостей
Переглядів 190 тис.
iPhone - телефон для нищебродов?!
0:53
ÉЖИ АКСЁНОВ
Переглядів 3,7 млн
Broken Flex Repair #technology #mobilerepair
0:50
ideal institute aligarh
Переглядів 1,2 млн
🤯Самая КРУТАЯ Функция #shorts
0:58
YOLODROID
Переглядів 2,7 млн
I wish I knew this When Istarted Programming #school #software  #codingtips
0:34
Claude Ams - Programming Guru 💻
Переглядів 13 млн