But most of them past their best.

We won't see so magnificent 😊 Real Madrid.

@@Foleytalenot past, still in best, maybe r9 after injuries was not that good, but rest were still at they peak, mentality they were even superior and more mature than in past

​@@NostalgicMem0riesgalacticos were very unsuccessful in ucl tho

@@russian_supremacy they won ucl once, but i agree they should have won way more. few notes why they were like that, they invested into attacker and attacking midfielders, but not defenders, while casillas was solid goalkeeper, their defence was mediocre, after hiero left and ramos era started there was gap, roberto carlos was always in attack and other were crap. they also sold makelele that won them ucl, and CDM is one of most important roles... second point is that we talk about early 2000s football, so many good players and teams in that era to play against. put this galacticos in this era and they would dominate it like real did in cr7 bale times 3 ucl in a row

Ever than maradona ?

No doubt!

A few still consider him the best they’ve seen with the injuries so I can’t argue with that. Not sure if it’s just a nostalgia thing though maybe? For me I’d say messi because he’s my era.

@@musakubilaypolat2600 🤔

Injuries is why there's a debate. He is still considered one of the GOATs of the game

How did he adapt it?

@@johnsmith-tq5zn It wasn't just the injury but als his age. His pace drastically declined. So he changed from a winger to a classic striker. He didn't make as many deep runs anymore but became a better finisher, especially in the important games. Pretty much the same that happened to R9.

Mine too :)))

Most legends aren’t appreciated until they retire.

​@@bryanguerra9311go check the history of R9s signing with RM

True !

That team wasn’t the GALACTICOS (without Ronaldo and Beckham)

There are few goals from 2000-2001 when Ronaldo and Beckham were not yet signed@@gabrielaranedafigueroa8609

@@gabrielaranedafigueroa8609 It was in 2002 that’s the galacticos era

Играли красиво, но по сути Галактикос толком ничего и не выиграли.

только после такого понимаешь насколько велик КР7, его подборка голов в сухую куда красивее топа голов всего галактикос, + выиграл с командой куда больше @@nikolayscherbakoff519

THE NAME " GALACTIC " COMES FROM THE NUMBERS OF THOSE FORTUNES AND ABILITIES.......... THEY WEREN'T FROM THIS WORLD.................

Yes!!

Потому что лч это кубковый турнир в отличие от чемпионата. Что бы победить в чемпионате нужна стабильность, в лч все может решить один матч и не всегда побеждает сильнейшая команда

@@user-uu7lq1hy1x или несоблюдение тренировочного режима

Defense was shit and no depth

2002 zidane volley.

2001/02 Champions League winners 2002/03 Semi final lost 4-3 on aggregate to finalists Juventus 2003/04 Quarter final Draw 5-5 on aggregate to finalists Monaco who went through on away goals. 2004/05 Last 16 Knocked out by Juventus 2-1 on aggregate 2005/06 Last 16 lose 1-0 on aggregate to finalists Arsenal