This "we don't like what you say so we are labeling it as misinformation and 'canceling' you." BS must end.

The level of corruption and manipulation in the world these days is unfathomable to the average person. We are truly stuffed.

It must be extremely convenient to declare anyone that disagrees with you as, 'unreliable and harmful' and ignore the truth.

This guy speaks truth. “They” have theories which are unproven. Censorship is dangerous. Welcome to the dark ages 2.0

Someone recently stated that Google is the largest, most successful mind control device ever created. I’m beginning to agree.

I was a 100% climate change believer (in boots and all including spending 20K to put solar panels on my roof) until the day I watched a debate featuring Dr Roy Spencer. The debate was an hour long with a Q&A and by the time it was over it made me want to investigate the many claims that were being made. I read Dr Spencers book Climate Confusion and then another book by Dr Tim Ball and immersed myself in understanding the argument being put forward by the skeptic community. Now after careful consideration of many of the facts I find myself to be a skeptic. The most amazing thing that I experienced after this journey was the lifting of a level of anxiety about our existence that I didn't even realise I had.

Getting pretty easy to know what's true, basically it's the opposite of whatever "consensus" is being declared.

I'm kind of a weather junkie and would look at the temperature plots from all over the world including the polar regions everyday on the interactive radar. Over a year ago, most of the temperature plots of the polar and subpolar regions were removed. I thought to myself maybe they don't want us to see it because we might be seeing trends they don't want us to see. I then thought I was being a conspiracy nut. Now I'm not so sure.

It's all about power and control, not the truth.

Even so, it’s suppression and censorship, for “wrong-think”.

These cancellers need to start seeing some big lawsuits and consequences. If victims never hold them to account they'll keep doing it.

Them: Trust the science. Also them: Not like that!

Just proves that it's just as easy to buy a climate alarmist scientist as it is to buy a politician. Dr Roy please keep doing what your doing, the world needs truth not political propaganda.

"Believe the science!!!" Unless the science disproves their agenda!!!

I remember being 9 or 10 and hearing about New Ice Age models for the first time, while Al Gore was talking about “global warming” on the radio. It occurred to me that he’d soon switch to a vague term like “climate change,” so as to be “proven right” no matter which direction the climate seemed to shift. *A couple years later, “climate change” replaced “global warming.”* I was a stupid kid, and I’m still not wise (this is a silly gamertag). But c’mon, when cancel culture is applied against dissenting data models, it’s obvious what’s happening.

The prominent climate scientists have underestimated the way the oceans mitigate global temperature and has done so for millennia.

The same happened with covid. Plenty of scientific voices expressing doubts, all silenced.

We absolutely have to break up big tech.

This is exactly why the USA, and the world, needs smaller government. Bureaucrats should have very limited power, narrowly defined by statutes, rules, and regulations. Whenever an agency, such as the USA Department of Energy, decides to set policies that affect the public convenience and necessity, they should be required to hold open to the public meetings with opportunities for interested parties to address the issues.

We have access to these tools ourselves. I've been tracking this since the mid-90s. Also I'm a person that goes out of my way to not pollute my surroundings. Global warming is a real thing, all you have to do is take a glance at Venus. This is my problem. USA taiwan, japan, France, Germany, Sweden, every first world country is producing about the same amount of average carbon emissions. 150 ppbv's. New York City is the most polluted place and the United States at 500 during its peak. China is producing 2,000 up to 3,000 units on average. There's a few key cities that almost never drop below 5,000. Yets everyday I hear from the left that we need to curb our missions but not one single person is pointing out the fact that even if every first world country stop producing carbon emissions completely. China nullify any kind of effect that would have on the planet.

"The truth does not mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged" - Unknown

Whatever he said, must have been true. Truth is the first thing they squash.

Thank you UKposts for all of the disinformation “context” boxes. Without those I would be absolutely lost. Thanks also for doing all of the thinking for me. It is a big help to know the right way that I should form my world view. Perhaps u should consider removal of all videos and simply display ONLY context boxes. That might be a very good business model allowing for equity and diversity.

thank you for allowing this man's valuable data to be shared, instead of hidden by those corrupt monsters

That's funny, Tony Heller has been saying the same thing this guy has. If you're telling the truth, Google and Boobtube will try to silence you.

Have followed Dr Roy Spencer for quite a few years. His data is the gold standard. That’s why they have gone after him.

And remember, for a good part of the northern hemisphere, 1979 or there about, was the end of a cold cyclical period that covered the previous decade or so. So it’s only normal, temperatures would trend up after that period.

The earth has been warming about 1.5 to 2 degrees per century for a very long time. Chicago just released average temperatures for the last century. They weren't very precise but stated average temperature went up between 1 and 2 degrees. That is a century of record keeping in the same place.

If "they"ignore it, it probably isn't true; if they go to great lengths to discredit it, it's absolutely true.

Well you know this guy is right when the UKposts "context" warning pops up.

I'm still waiting to read proof that the warming that has occurred since the Little Ice Age has much of anything to do with carbon dioxide (CO2). Independent researchers for both historical CO2 levels and temperature show that 550 million years ago CO2 levels were around 7,000 parts per million (ppm). Temperatures were at the mid to high 20 degree Centigrade level. Over the next 50 million years CO2 levels plummeted to 4,500 ppm yet temperatures remained stable. Then there's the Cryogenic period when CO2 levels were 40,000 ppm and the Earth froze over twice. After reading over 100 books by climatologists, environmentalists, geologists, meteorologists, philosophers and others regarding climate I'm than ever convinced this is really about the money. By declaring CO2 a pollutant politicians then had the ability to tax that which produces it, namely fossil fuels. The bad news is it's bankrupting western civilization. Some European countries are now beginning to realize this and are backing away from their NetZero commitments. Meanwhile the larger BRICS nations are on a power plant building spree with coal-fired plants in the vast majority.

when youre so rich you get to dictate what "science"and "truth" is

MSM: "Follow The Science!" Scientist: *provides factual data that counters the narrative* MSM: "NOT SCIENCE! *THE* SCIENCE!"

This type of censorship applies to everything unfortunately, from scientific research to fact checkers.

On Jan. 19, 2009, James Hansen, climate expert who until last year was head of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies, firmly declared that President Obama “has only four years to save the Earth” which you might have noticed he failed to do. Back in 2006, Al Gore told us that we had only “10 years” to solve the global‐​warming problem.

A question that needs to be answered is just how much heating is occurring once you remove the urban heat island effect from the data?

It basically means YOU'RE RIGHT and they're wrong. They're just using their instituted means to push a narrative. Keep up the good fight.

When the climate alarmist say it isn't true, you know without a doubt its true

The UN said the dust bowl would return to the USA and that entire nations would be submerged by the rising sea level due to global warming. The UN said these things would happen in 10 years. They said this in 1989.

In today's science you don't have to to prove anything. You just have to feel and believe it. Just like every pre school toddler

fun fact: not a single climate model does predict the measurements correctly. They are all above the measurements.

He needs to sue Google: they have defamed him by stating that what he says professionally is harmful and unreliable, whereas it clearly is simply an exposition of pure data.

Using linear models for a non linear, chaotic system perhaps? So Google is ignoring actual data in favour of model 'predictions'.

Old science: Create a hypothesis, make observations. If the observations don't fit the hypothesis, change the hypothesis. New "science": Create a hypothesis, make observations. If the observations don't fit the hypothesis, alter the observations.

And Doctor Facebook fact checked the British Medical Society. Like China we are allowed to know what they let us know.

The leading scientist says something like "I have no proof but I believe that it is human made" .... wow ... what a great scientist.

Google is the last place I look for truth.

Of course they don’t want the accurate temperature changes to be announced, otherwise they will lose all their funding.

This confirms what I’ve been thinking, that the predictions of catastrophe that the climate models spit out seem to be worst-case scenarios that have no relation to reality.

Thank you Dr for the 43 years of research and the proof the world needs to intelligently filter the truth from the background noise!

Climatology must be held up to the same standard as any other discipline. If climatologists willfully continue to pimp broken methodology to promote hysteria in the service of their agenda, the institutions of that science must discipline them with the decertification of their credentials! Climatology must return to a gold-standard of methodology and disavow anyone who corrupts this!

“Trust the science” only if it supports your cause…

'unreliable and harmful claims' means "not toting the approved narrative, regardless of your facts."

• The oceans haven't warmed • The polar caps haven't melted • The polar bears have not gone extinct • The seas haven't risen • Hurricanes/cyclones haven't risen in intensity • Hurricanes/cyclones haven't risen in frequency • There hasn't been 30 - 100 years of drought as predicted • Islands in the oceans haven't sunk and disappeared, but continue to prosper • There are ZERO climate refugees from 3rd world countries flooding the west bc of global warming • Snow from ski resorts hasn't vanished • The earth hasn't warmed much in last 30 yrs • CO2 caused by humans is way too small in the mix of gases in the stratosphere to have any significance at all ALL. ONE. BIG. GLOBAL. HOAX !

How dare this grubby little scientist insert his factual data into their pre-conceived resultant models? The nerve!

btw.. Whenever Google/UKposts posts a little "context" header directing you to a "reliable source" that is pretty much much an admission that you're looking at an inconvenient truth.

Their claim of "Follow the Science" just isn't genuine when it doesn't agree with their evil narrative.

If not for the UAH there would be nothing to contradict the "corrections" climatolologists apply to historical temperature measurements

The top geologist in the country a few years ago said that global warming is B S and if anyting the planet is cooling off rather than heating up......

It’s about money, it always is. They make billions off scaring the heck out of people

Thank you Dr. Spencer, for not jumping aboard the global warming gravy train like so many other scientists!

Your telling me the company with the most specific data, rules, requirements, etc have no specifics? Yup.

Get so tired of big tech’s “we will tell you what’s really true” boxes. Every box is an insult because they are really saying people are too stupid to make decisions for themselves. To me the boxes really say “we don’t like this person having free speech” boxes. Or big tech is saying they are so stupid they would believe this video unless they were told beforehand what to believe.

The fact that UKposts has labeled this video under its title with its own link to their own definition of climate change shows that google isn't the only one trying to disprove the experts.

Would be interesting to see the results of these climate scientists research, if the scientists didn't have to choose between a four bedroom house in Surrey or a cardboard box under London bridge, dependant on the "data" they release.

It's the microplastics in the air. Not fossil fuels. We are making a huge greenhouse.

Refusing to open your ears is self -destructive! Following the cool side is often done with no knowledge!

this has always happened in science. Basically if you dont give the correct answers you dont get funded.

When the real adults take back control, this is something that needs to be dealt with once and for all!

Social media needs to be held accountable through some legal means, possible also being mandated to switch off their service if they dont comply ..... wouldnt that be interesting.

Does anyone think the warming could be due to the magnetic poles drifting in combination with the Sun reaching super high Solar activity? I mean this stuff cannot happen w/o repercussions...thoughts?

Don’t burst the climate change bubble..... John Kerry needs the job and the politicians need the “climate change” money. Big money.

I haven't researched the subject in enough detail, but the fact that the same shitty people that are on the wrong side of the coof and health are trying to censor him make me more inclined to assume he must be saying something right.

Earth is not a stagnant marble.

THEY SHOULD BECOME A UTILITY SO NO ONE WOULD EVER PAY 4 THEIR BS!!!$$$$ NEVER!!!👿👿👿

Riddle me this, climate alarmists - when the earth was emerging from the last ice age, was that due to global warming too?

Silver lining to this pandemic: Started questioning what the "mainstream narrative" was on many alarmist subjects. I used to be all in on alarming people on Climate change, went to rallies, etc. Built a business with that in mind. Now... look at objectively on all sides, all time frames, I think a lot clearer and rationally. Also not denying any human cause, but all things considered its a much smaller component than the MSM would have you believe.

At school back in the 70's we were told a new ice age was coming, in the 80's the Global Warming gang took hold of the narrative and predicted all kinds of catastrophes by the year 2000 etc. None of which have been remotely close! Now when I was at school doing A 'Level maths and physics, plus technical studies etc, I was taught how to calculate a mathematical average. It is a very simple process, eg: if there are 10 houses in a small street, with varying numbers of occupants, you simple add the number of occupants together and divide by the number of houses, to get the average number of occupants per household. So for clarity this would be a simple example, House No 1, 3ppl, No 2, 2ppl, No 3 5ppl, No 4, 1ppl, No 5, 4ppl, No 6, 2ppl, No7, 3ppl, No 8, 6ppl, No 9, 4ppl, No 10, 4ppl. So we have a total of 33 people living in 10 houses. So the average number of occupants in each house is 33/10= 3.3. Now to arrive at this average number you need two constants, the number of houses and the number of people. If two kids leave home and leave the street, then the average number of occupants becomes 3.1 per household! A big change to a climate scientist. Now to the main point of this little example, to say the AVERAGE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE, think ppl in the houses, has risen by XYZ, then you need to have reliable temperature readings from the same data point over the period of time you are stating the temperature has risen. NO WHERE CAN YOU FIND A LIST OF THE DATA POINTS THESES CLIMATE CLAIMERS HAVE BEEN USING GOING BACK OVER 100 YEARS< SO HOW THE HELL CAN THEY GIVE SUCH PRECISE FIGURES? As you can see from the simple example above, just two kids leaving a street changes the average by a factor of appx 6%!!! Also the fact the climate warms in some places, and cools in others means a SINGLE GLOBAL AVERAGE is almost meaningless! Droughts and wild fires are not a direct result of a 0.5 degree rise in temperature, they are due to climatic conditions causing more rain to fall in different areas, leaving the land in the dry areas prone to fires. The land where floods occur don't see this activity every year, why? Because it doesn't rain the same amount each year, it is infinitely variable, and when the land becomes saturated, due to too much rainfall, you get floods! One last point, the people who predict what will happen if all the ice on earth melts are probably more crazy than a flat earther, as if you take a look at any decent weather site, you will see temps in the Arctic, Antarctic and Greenland, Siberia etc virtually never see positive figures. As an example, today we have -6 C in the middle of Norway, -22 in Northern Siberia, -40 In central Greenland, -34 In central Canada, -5 in Fairbanks Alaska, and -45 in the South Pole! So all these places covering a large area of the planet are not only below freezing, they are ACCUMULATING MORE ICE! And for these places to be at an average temperature to actually loose their ice would take a seismic change to the earths inclination that would render other catastrophes much more serious to our existence than a little bit of hot weather! Lastly, the earth will only be here for around another 10 billion years according to a few sources, so even if you could set off now at the speed of light and go for a trip to our nearest star, Alpha Centauri, you would just get back in time to see the sun explode and the Earth will turn back into a cloud of matter floating through the cosmos looking for another gravitational source to pull it all together. So worrying about 1 or 2 degrees and causing all this misery with stupid electric cars and impossible directives just seems a little bit dumb? But then our political leaders aren't coming over as very competent lately, unless it is to do with them getting money out of something, then they seem quite proficient!

The last thing Google want is to advertise when they sanction a site as it brings unwanted curiosity as people want something to comment on and find out the truth accidentally.

Discovering truthful data that don't fit the required narrative???? How DARE you!

Controlling everything is the aim , free thinking is their nemesis .

When UKposts demonetizes, the algorithm also suppresses the occurrences of suggesting that same video in the "you might like" playlist suggestions on the lower right. It's not just income, but views that get quashed.

What's amazing is that so little land mass contrasted with vast amount of water on earth but yet warming the entire globe.

when I was a kid, there was scenery, you could see for miles in some areas in NE, not any more, freak'n trees have grown like weeds up here, it sucks, all you see are trees, trees, trees, trees, so, tell us again how bad CO2 is !!!

More people need to listen to this meteorologist. He is absolutely right. Him telling the facts does not fit the woke establishment.

When they try to silence you then you know that you're absolutely on the right side of the truth....

I would like to hear Dr Spencer's opinion on carbon reduction in relation to the acidification of the oceans, climate/warming aside. There are other issues like that, as well as the depletion of resources like soil and uncontaminated water, that people will not act on because they become anti-environmental as though it is a left wing issue.

Google is hysterical, I wanted to find flights and they're shaming you about CO2 emissions on flight search now hahaha

A very inconvenient truth.

I know first hand that office workers in the public service know more about climate change than I do, I just been a scientist for 20 years.

I remember back in the late 70’s and early 80’s we had a lot of really hot days. The scientists said Miami would be under water by 2000. Well in 2010 it still looked pretty dry in the streets to me. The traffic cameras today still have dry streets. Still waiting.

I am very concerned about global warming/climate change and have a lot of faith in the majority that go against this fellow. HOWEVER, this guy has a lot of credibility and if he can provide verifiable data based on his research then Jesus Christ he should be listened to and not receive this type of treatment. These are the typed of people who have the juice to talk about these things with authority and as opposed to listening to my drunk brother-in-law who claims climate change isn’t the result of humans I’ll listen objectively to this guy. Knowledgeable people like this guy can ease a crap load of eco-anxiety. I’m disappointed in Google but that us their prerogative.

The conspiracy theorist were talking about this 25 years ago and people couldn’t stop laughing at them.

Big tech attempting to hide everything... Also Big tech: We're going to be fully transparent.

De-monetize Google!

I was mad about the censorship after watching this video. Decided to check out Dr. Spencer's website: He does point out that the linear warming trend of 0.13 degrees/decade can be observed. Which is still alarming.

The more important point is that temperature changes are perfectly inline with solar activity. Human activity has virtually no affect on global temperatures. That is a fact. We must remember that when CSIOR was asked to present scientific evidence of man made climate change they couldn't provide any abd ended up stating that the CSIOR had never claimed that man made climate change was real or that we are facing an existential threat, despite the fact that Politicians and media personalities have claimed that they have.

If he was being totally honest then he would tell the reporter that carbon dioxide doesn't drive earth temperature and that human omissions are insignificant.

I’m truly surprised UKposts is running this! Great informative video!

Sinister indeed . . . it is contrary to their agenda.