Based Romanian 🇹🇷❤️🇭🇺❤🇷🇴 Love from Turkey

NATO's first secretary general, Hastings "Pug" Ismay, famously declared that the organization's mission was "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down." NATO's mission has not changed in the more than seventy years since 1952 when the organisation founded to oppose the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union fell apart more than thirty years ago, and Russia is not the Soviet Union of old, and left Eastern Europe voluntarily leaving NATO without a mission, and yet the U.S. occupation forces remained in Germany consistent with the original NATO mission statement mentioned above? Russian President VIladimir Putin has claimed that he once raised the possibility of Russia joining NATO with then-President Bill Clinton, and that Clinton said he had "no objection." America remains as committed as ever to keeping the Germans down and preventing Europe from becoming a peer competitor by sabotaging Germany's burgeoning economic co-operation and partnership with Russia, which would have benefited all of us, and this was most vividly demonstrated by the destruction of Nordstream by the U.S., effectively an act of war on Germany. The war in Ukraine was supposed to accomplish two American foreign policy objectives, the first being to bring Russia to its knees economically and the second being to weaken Germany and Europe. Whilst the U.S. has failed abjectly in achieving the first objective, the EU appears to be trapped in a death spiral with industry now unable to rely on cheap energy from Russia relocating out of Germany and the EU while America profits from substituting it's own more expensive gas and it's insatiable Military Industrial Complex earning bilions from supplying new arms and ammunition to Ukraine and to replenish depleted European stocks.

Yes but are some hungaryans brain parrarel wich Say (TRaNsIIlVVaniA iS HunGaaRy💅💅💅💅💅💅💅🇭🇺🇭🇺🗣️🗣️)

❤

W

🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺

Brothers, ha ha, they came and devide Slavs in south and north...

​@@ruleofpeacepriests6911So what? Slavs are migrated to the balkans and no one asked them to so🤣🤣😭 Source:en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_migrations_to_the_Balkans

Thanks 🇭🇺❤🇲🇽

Thanks 🇭🇺❤️🇲🇽

Thanks

Thanks

Köszi😁🇭🇺

🇭🇺♥️🇵🇱

Mi is titeket! 🤝

🇭🇺❤️‍🔥🇵🇱

🇭🇺♥️🇬🇪😊😘

But you have to understand good. We only speak since 895 about the Hungarian State not earlier. But I find the video good.

@@tiborfarkas5180 This video is a TRASH! First of all the creator os separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

yeah because they didnt exist

​@@fabialexandru4498cigány, 1859 ROMAnia founded 😂

@@J-IK By ur logic germany has short history bc Germany was founded in 1871 , ur not smart at all asian

I think you are also descendants of the Scythians or Sarmatians, just like the Ugors - Hungarians and the Magors - Magyars, only you spoke a more Sarmatian-Slavic language! For example, the ruling class of the medieval Poles knew very well that they were once Sarmatians! Nowadays, many people dispute that the Slavic languages ​​and peoples could be related to the Sarmatians or possibly the Scythians, and based on genetic and linguistic research, the roots of the Slavic peoples go back to the Iranian Sarmatians, since after the Scythians, the Sarmatians conquered and ruled the entire Eastern Europe, all the way to the Huns! Based on the archaeological research, the Sarmatians completely switched over to the Huns, but when the elite tribes of the Huns retreated to the east after the death of Atilla, the descendants of the Sarmatians remained here. And then this also explains why the Ugric Scythian language was limited to only one narrow area, the Carpathian basin! Anyway, as far as I know, the Slovak language has many words related to the Hungarian language, which would prove a long coexistence in the kingdom of Hungary, but maybe also a relationship between the peoples and the languages of Scythians and Sarmatians!

​@@szakaattila7899szlovák = Magyar + Czech

Wow you are the only Slovak , who is proud of that . Massive respect to both nations ! From CZ . Hajrá Mátyás király! I am.proud he was our king too.

​@@J-IKSlovak=Slavic, magyar= mongolian + turk. 😉😜

​@@mareqg4849slovak=otrok! MAG-yar=ENKI 🌌🌍🌞!

+1

🤣😂😝🤪= polish hungarian race connection -> sarmatians ! = only two kurva exist in europe = magyar + lengyel , the dwa bratanki + firewater : wodka + pálinka ! = 😏🤪

No w ostatnim czasie to trochę niekoniecznie.

🇭🇺💪🇵🇱

He spent more than 2 months

Péter Szilágyi, "such a good and elaborate video of the history of the Hungarians"..????? Teljesen elmentek otthonról? This video is a TRASH! First of all the creator os separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

Toto video je zavadzajuce.

Incredible poor video. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

@@martinm3594 slavonia and zagreb were under hungarian influence, but southern than river sava croatia was fully independent, croatian nobles were totally free there, they had their money, they had their army, their cities and most important they could do whatever they wanted without king's permission. I know that in 1102 to 1527 we were in personal union and yes kings were rulers but these nobels were free and hungarians never established strong rule there, it was some kind of commowealth

Praise our mutual hero Zrinski/Zrínyi 🇭🇷🤝🇭🇺⚔️🇹🇷 1566 Glory to the Brave

@@ffarkasm he literally saved europe

@@swordfish_wotb2249 So there was autonomy?

@@Artuuur_005 not autonomy, equal rights to both nations

The ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

Far cry hard from that: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

Don't let the details fool you, that doesn’t mean it's true.

detailed but he forget the turan and hun(garian) empire that conquered Rome

@@ancienthunnicempire-hungar241 😂😂😂😂

@@Tovalokodonc romanian

@@Tovalokodonc It's troll edition. :)

Not really, the author ignored hundreds of years! First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

Lol

haha

Not really, ethusiastic, but poor work: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

@@sghxcy angry hungarian😡🇭🇺

@@srpskahentai9782 Sorry, teh mistakes are annoying really, despite the intention of the aker was surely good.

CsabiTube, megnézted te rendesen ezt a videót? First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

@Defender of Flop Ok, i understand, but this does not mean we should ignore crucial mistakes; in fact when the goal is the biggest accuracy. So now he has the chance to correct it.

First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

@@sghxcy we know, this is not perfect, but still the best one at the moment, so i guess we need to appreciate his work. Am I wrong?

@@olymonusolymonus2637 Yes, there are better demonstrations which don't erase hundreds of years....

And few major errors as well: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

Nagymagyar, hoygan lehet ennyire vak? jesszusom a magyarok itt mind meggárgyultak? Hogyhogy nem veszed észre az amatőr, ostoba hibáit a szerzőnek? First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

@@sghxcy akkor csinálj jobbat. Hajrá.

@@nekutassutanam Ok, te meg mielőtt valamit mesterműnek hívsz, előtte jól ellenőrizd le!

Correct opinion, compared to Bohemia and Moravia, Hungary was more free. Nevertheless, the author did not describe it badly in the video, between 1700 and 1867 there was little Hungarian state, although you wrote it the emperor was legally the Hungarian king. Without a background grinder incineration, the video is not completely understanded.

Based.

First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

Ervin, és az oké hogy 1711-1867-ig eltüntette Magyországot a térképről? Miért kell félrevezetni az embereket?

@@sghxcy I think he didn’t include it since at that point Hungary wasn’t really “independent” but under complete Austrian rule until the creation of the duel monarchy

First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

@@sghxcy Yeah, there are clearly a lot of mistakes, but considering the quality of similar videos...

@@Tovalokodonc Ok, but we cannot give up ultimate accuracy, especial many I mentioned are very huge flaws, unfortunately :(

​@@Tovalokodonc Hungary is Romanian

@@superpower21 Thanks for the childish comment

Its after a Major battle won by Hungary, bulgarian Historian told me to show it like that because dates are disputed.

@@POGKPP Thank you!

@@POGKPP As a final question, what is the state of “Gyepú” supposed to represent as Transylvania is disputed till 936?

No historical source says they conquered Transilvania from Bulgaria, idk what have u been smoking but its nit good for your health, Hungarian sources speak of a man named Gelou as the Ruler of Transilvania, Glad in Banat and Menumorut in Parthium/Crisana, and after Gelou was defeated by the magyar chieftain Tuhutum his son Went to banat where he resisted the magyar conquest for some more time, and then Gyla/Iuliu the 1st up to Gyula/Iuliu the 3rd were probably the descendants of Ahtum, or not, by this time the magyar sources tend to differ, I only used Hungarian sources for my statement, in case I m acused of Bias or something.

@@stefansmith4372 Gyeppu is something as a Buffer land, like the Marches of the Frankish empire,

Oh, hello there)

@@justpetrushka sup ;)

no

First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

The Hungarian language is related to the Finnish and Estonian languages ​​but practically unintelligible (like other languages). They are part of the Finno-Ugric group. It looks like a European population because their nomadic ancestors were not very numerous, they conquered the Pannonian space and others only militarily and later linguistically not ethnically. The Hungarian kingdom in general throughout its history has been a small "empire" of many ethnic groups (Hungarians, Cumans, Romanians, Slavs, Germans, etc.). The nomadic population has been reduced in battle over time and has mixed with the majority native population of the Carpathian Basin, so it looks like Europeans .

Because in central Asia there was white europeans lived. The Hunnic invasian, and the others too just a retreat, because mongolid races become too strong. Interestingly, some of the Attilas hunnic wariors have balkanic genes. Their burial found in nowadays Mongolia.

​@@xerxen100Are the Hungarians the remnants of the Huns, who were a group of Turkic descent who came from Central Asia to Europe in the fourth century AD under the command of A.T.I.L.A. They did not come to Europe

@@muhammadmahdikarimi12 Partially. The ruler elite were certainly the remnants of Attila and his Huns. The commoners were mixed aboriginals, slavs, Avars, germans, vikings, semitic peoples, turks, Iranians and many more. But the core were always the Huns, till the 16th century, after that and nowadays the Jews rule Hungary.

Great video with full of mistakes. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/hoaXgGaFrmaWt4k.html here's the song, thank me later

Zavadzajuce video.madari prisly na velku moravu a ziadna hungaria tu nebola.ako polak by si to mal vediet kedze sliezko a vislansko boli sucast miravy

with silly mistakes

he doesnt ad turan (house of all turks hungarians finns and mongols) and Hunnic empire (we conqiered romanians and take rome)

Prime Minister and President are two different things. Also, despite what everyone says, I believe if Orbán wouldn't run for the position with highest power, FIDESZ MAYBE(!) wouldn't have supermajority (Although so many ppl hate Gyurcsány, who can be seen as the leader of the opposition, that maybe they's have that anyways)

Hungary is a parliamental republic, where the Head of State (aka the President) has only symbolical power. The first leader is the Head of Government (aka the Prime Minister). But the video shows Miklós Horthy, the Head of State (Regent) for the Kingdom of Hungary, and then also shows the Presidents for People's Republic of Hungary. But in those times, the Head of the Communist party was the highest power, and not the President. It should have shown Rákosi as leader from 1947 until 1956, then Kádár from 1956 until 1989. Even thought its still an amazing video!

@@ancienthunnicempire-hungar241 stop larping as an oriental. youre just as european as your average french or pole

The video is impressively mistaken. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!

You can use video as a source if you credit me

​@@POGKPP Köszönöm. Also, great video as always

I would say it would be a mistake, because the territory was not Hungarian. It was in equal part Romanian. Consider the most important aspects of it's history. The revolt of Horea Closca and Crisan, as well as the revolt of Avram Iancu. If you are to acknowledge those, you would know Hungary didn't hold the territory in any way. It was under Habsburg rule, with a significant Romanian population, as admitted by the Saxon leadership and their statements on the territory. The land was Romanian, as according to the vast majority of the population, Romanians and Germans combined.

@@sticlavoda5632 I didn't thought about showing it as an entity inside Hungary, but inside Habsburg Monarchy, as I stated. And yes, Romanians for sure made at least 50% of population (it may had been higher/lower, but Romanians were present). And yes, I will cover Revolt of Horea, as well as possibly Bobalna Revolt, and of course Revolt of György Dózsa (this one spread over big part of Hungary; also, I'm not gonna argue about his ethnicity)

@@triballianmapper I don't care much about arguing ethnicity, but I believe that the census data from the Habsburg period, and the statements made by several scholars and statisticians over the years, all showcase a clear Romanian majority from the 1600s onwards at the very least. Romanians have been considered the most highly prominent people of Transylvania, and the native ancestral population of the region since the 11th to 12th century. If this is true or not I can not objectively say, but if we are to logically account for this fact, a Romanian majority is evident.

Sunt ca un cui în mijlocul Europei. Cuiul care va face mereu rău celorlalte popoare, la umbra URSULUI din est. In realitate au fost mereu in umbra Austriei sau Rusiei. Ungaria Mare nu a existat ! Din păcate lobyul lor este ascultat mai ales în America. Minciunile ridicate la rang de adevăr.... O minciună repetată la infinit ajunge sa fie percepută că adevăr daca nu este contracarată cu argumente de adevărații istorici.

Shaightly frustrated. Saying you know things.

Romanian 🤔🤔

Nici nu-ţi dai seama că de fapt vorbeşti despre "Mioriţa", singura baladă originală despre etnogeneza reală a unui popor de păstori şi oieri nomazi din Balcani!

@@Arpoxais1Ateas2 Fiecare popor are Miorita lui. Invidia, crima din invidie este peste tot.

idk

After Mohacs, there were the kingdom of hungary, called eastern Hungary, and the kingdom of hungary, the royal hungary.

@@xerxen100 tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmanl%C4%B1_%C4%B0mparatorlu%C4%9Fu#/media/Dosya:OttomanEmpireIn1683.png

Plagues, wars etc.

Na végre valaki észrevette, amit a többség nem. Amatőr hibák vannak ebben a videóban.

​@@sghxcy Na ja. És minden egyes ilyen hungarian history videónál ezt elrontják... Csak nem tudom, hogy miért mert eléggé egyértelmű, hogy létezett Magyarország Habsburg uralom alatt...

@@tibi7402 Azért mert a sok képzetlen, műveletlen ember keveri a Habsburg "Birodalmat" Ausztriával, holott maga a Habsburg Birodalom is csak azon területek összessége volt ahol Habsburg uralkodó volt, nem volt egy ország stb. Nem képesek felfogni...

Hungarians have owned that territory for a long time, but now the Hungarians living there are oppressed by the 🇺🇦 government & can’t speak their language in schools.

@@schutzanzug4518 You are obviuosly Russian bot because nowadays Hungarians do not live in the steppes of Ukraine (they live in Transcarpathian region). And Hungarians can speak their language free in Ukraine but they also must know the state (Ukrainian) language (as well as in every state of Europe children of ethnic minorities learn the state language at school). So it is pure propaganda that Hungarian children are prohibited to speak or to learn Hungarian at Hungarian schools in Ukraine.

@@TheOlgaSasha there is a minority of Hungarians that live there. Go do your own research, but Hungarian gatherings have been raided on camera for no apparent reason, Ukraine has been pressuring minorities for a while, and get this, 80% of the population of Carpathia wanted autonomy or independence, after the breakup of the Soviet Union when they were now apart of Ukraine. Of course the Ukraine never has given them autonomy, still, along with all of the other people Ukraine oppresses, like the Russians.

if you don't like living in Ukraine, then you should return back to your real homeland, and not spread the propaganda of idea of being a separate country as simple as that But of course, you'll ignore my comment, because you won't find a counterarguement against the truth@@schutzanzug4518

​@@TheOlgaSashaTheir cruel minority laws have brought the separatists upon themselves. They have only themselves to blame for what happened, as the Russians there did not want to secede in the first place.

@драза михаиловић true he is deeply invested in what he s doing

Hungary and turkey are not friends

​@@magyar2896brother

We are all from ancient turan but hungarians where creators of this empire

Yeah,thieves and stealers of others territories..

@@ruleofpeacepriests6911 didnt every nation start like that?

@@black_station No, some were the first settlers after ice age..

I am a Greek and i have to say. Greece. Bulgaria. Serbia an Hungary have a lot in common. We all lost our nearby land. And we all want it back. Especially as Greeks want Northern Epirus and Constantinople.

@@ruleofpeacepriests6911 You say that of hungary? You are talking crap just tripping.A feel you uncivilized. Don't be frustrated.

Azt is megköszönöd hogy eltüntette magyarországot néhány száz évre?

@@sghxcy te tényleg nem értetted meg amit írtam a köszönéssel. Kicsit gondold át

@@atillakrisztian8023 Én értem, csak azt nem hogy miért nem nézted meg figyelmesen a videót. Még ha a szándék nemes is volt, igazából munició a magyarellenes propagandistáknak :/

@@sghxcy tisztában vagyok vele DE a propagáláson kívül mire mennek? Semmire Ha nagyon lépnének meg tették volna de egyik sem veszi bátorságát hozzá

@@atillakrisztian8023 Ezért kellünk mi legalább, meg hogy legyünk többen. Nem adhatjuk fel.

You're right. Those parts were leaded separately. By Transylvanian leaders (Fejedelem)

Hi.

Not, the Germans did it not you

@@romanianlegioner3980 Where do you know that?

​​@@botiabonyi In the summer of the year 410, Visigoths from Eastern Europe ended a three-day sack of the city of Rome (now the capital of Italy). This was the first time Rome had been defeated in nearly 800 years. As for the Visigoths themselves: they were an early Germanic people who, along with the Ostrogoths, constituted the two major political entities of the Goths within the Roman Empire in late antiquity, or what is known as the Migration Period. So early Eastern Germanic Tribes, and not the Hungarians. And if you still need more clarity on the subject, you can feel free to google the history of the fall of the Roman Empire yourself.

There was no such thing as Barbarian invasions.

I just wish I was able to find that first csango music

Czarnogóra albo bitwa o kijów.

Jakie są tutaj błędy?