(ᵔᴥᵔ)

Please add Arabic translation

hello there historymarche ive recently heard the news about you're father i hope he will recover and i wish you luck in these tough times, thanks for all the video's love you're work.

@@aa_23485 I will. UKposts subs are bugged, I can't upload subtitles at the moment. Hopefully this will get resolved in a few hours.

I don't know if showing a Image of Jibril as (Gabriel) was a good idea! Other then that Much to love to you and your familly !

Exactly Islam is the way of life of every prophet.

He brought a composite religion he created from a mixture of Judaism, Christianity and the Pagan beliefs dominant in Mecca at the time. This probably explains why Islam is so mixed up.

@@yktv.tounsi Mohammad is the only prophet in Islam....he is not from the line of Prophet’s and he is obviously not a Prophet for Christians or Jews.

@@rorynicholson8558 as i said, Abraham is not a Jew even according to Judaism, nor christian according to christianity, so no one can say that islam copied from judaism or christianity

@@rorynicholson8558 what are you talking about

use this 🤲

why is he not supposed to be pictured ?

He did it because he doesn't want to be beh eaded

@@rurhmcwatch9410 it is haram (forbidden in Islam) to try making a picture/drawing if him

@@rurhmcwatch9410 In Islam, Muslims are taught to avoid creating pictures or Images of the Prophets, Their Companions and family. It is mainly to avoid distortion of the image over time and to avoid disrespecting the individual being portrayed. We can never really capture their true Beauty as they were amongst the best of people

be aware muslim,muhammad was never prophetize in the bible, you can lie to yourself about the corruption of the bible, he can claims to be the last prophet of what he thinks but the reality is islam isn't even abrahamic, because it clear in the hebraîc bible that god will make covenant through Abrahams, isaac, jacob, so why in the quran, a book which came 1900 years after the story of abraham state that ismaêl was in the covenant??

The video is being objective and did not make a comment on Muslim claims, that is what historians do, they should take sides.

​@@Mulberry2000yes if its about symbol. But if from the history perspektif is wrong. Islam has own history the name is Sirah Nabawi. Islam forbid to attack before it attack muslim nothing found about prophet raiding caravan

In your research, you will be impressed, as we were, by the ONLY MAN who has a COMPLETELY clean resume that does not bear a single mistake, even a small one in his ENTIRE LIFE! A man whose (followers agreed with his enemies) on his righteousness and fairness, so he is only sincere in his message about Allah (the God) to people of the world 🤍

You may read Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources by Martin Lings for a start. Followed by The Abbasid Dynasty, alongside Al-Andalus, greatly contributed to the development of the Islamic Golden Age, especially through the direct promotion of arts, philosophy, and scientific progress. I suggest finding from the right unbiased sources. Lost Islamic History by Firas Al-Khateeb is an abridged one for a start.

Run from Islam - they have nothing to offer you but darkness.

@@georgejones4435since when the Light is called a Darkness 😅

You should read about the beloved prophet of Islam Muhammad s a w peace be upon him

Early Muslim scholars were obsessed with recording the early history of Islam and their prophet with extreme attention to detail.

@@patrickriarchy1976 details so miticulus to the point of how h used to eat his food and with what hand

@@frankmark787 totally accurate and true, recording every detail is very important to learn and let others learn.

@@frankmark787 Perfectly noticed!! Even it is accurately recorded that what words he (Peace Be Upon him) said while seeing his image in mirror..

Well, we also know about many of the Roman and some of the ancient Greek battles.

If prophet Muhammad would accepted thier offers God would perished him .. and its not a prophet that God choose to refuse to obey God commands .. Prophets are the best and sincere humans chosen by God .

Even if you*

Sallallaho Alehi walehi wasallam

This is not authentic, he ﷺ said another statement which I cannot remember at the moment.

@@Abu_Hafs it is authentic actually

@@iSYRIANpaganists saying oh my gods

@@iSYRIAN Pagans are polytheistic, they have multiple Gods wheres we, Abrahamic religions have Monotheistic beliefs.

Me too I spotted that. The polytheism at it best قريش: يا أبا طالب إن ابن أخيك يسب آلهتنا! 😅

Because they were worshiping more than one god

@@iSYRIAN the quraysh worshipped more than 1 god

Thank you sir.

Moarr

Yup

It’s actually very very biased he only uses the Islamic sources when there’s no other source it’s very twisted

@@aziztherealone441 shame on romans that they didn't record the battle they have participated in!

This stupid His name is Amr son of hesham or abu jahl ( master of ignorance ) Not hisham

@@islamdowidar1930 umm… you are so wrong I don’t even know where to begin

Can you guys not argue about what that body of bones is called? Doesn't really mater, & faraz is trying to give some context

Umer bin hashaam

@@logistaur there is something really upsetting when somebody is mistaken, like Islam dowidar, yet he does it with an attitude.

Thank you so much for supporting the channel 🙏 I am also working on the Battle of Uhud

@@HistoryMarche Wow, thank you for new news about that. Keep it up!!! 💪

@@HistoryMarche Can not wait for it

@@HistoryMarche thank you! Can you please do battle of khandaq as well?

how much is 10k idr?

Another extended translation: (Already there has been for you a sign in two hosts that met (in battle), a host fighting in the cause of Allah and another of disbelievers; Seeing them (Seeing the disbelievers) twice their own number by eyesight. And Allah strengthens with His victory whom He wills. Indeed In that there is a lesson for those of vision.) Qur'an 3:13

Me too

They believed on many Gods

same lol

Same lol 😂,

@@themuhammad1 who would win 360 idols or 360 noscope arrow strats

هذا أخ أبو جهل ابن هشام وأبي بن خلف وحيي بن اخطب النضري والشيخ النجدي👹👹

According to whom? Himself? 😂

@@olekcholewa8171 according to Allah Azzawajal.

@@browser3152 And according to what Allah thinks that? Quran. And Quran was written by whom? Muhammad. So as you can see Islam is a circular logic, in which Quran says to obey Muhammad and Muhammad says to obey Quran 😂

​@@olekcholewa8171quran wasn't wrote by Muhammad

Thank you for the kind words and thank you for supporting my work. Very kind of you.

he said that Muhammad (saw) came up with a new religion. Islam was not a new religion, indeed it is the Abharamic faith. It is the religion of Moses and Jesus and other prophets who came before prophet Muhammad (saw)

@@talksense6648 Mistake happens, I don't think it's intentional. The video is more than great. The primary content of this video is about the battle.

@@plung3r Agreed, but it is one of the great mistakes. The biggest claim which non muslims have is that Islam was created by prophet Muhammad (saw). I know mistakes happen, but this one is very sensitive.

Same here. History Marche gave all important context to the battle which makes it much easier to understand the significance

@@talksense6648 He did not talk about religion except from a political point of view on the lips of Arab pagans who believed that it was a new religion and in fact it was legislation, religion and belief that Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, brought. As for the rest of the prophets, he came with legislation.

This is Greatest battle in Islamic history follow by The battle of the trench and uhud and Yarmouk and qadissya

@@RJFPme poor crybaby 😂

@@RJFPme christianity was a lot more damaging

@@il967 Whatever makes you feel better

@@leonrothier6638 the truth does

pedo

Yeah about 2000 gods to be technical 😁

bro not all quraish are non muslim

360 idols used to surround the Kaaba

They used to make idol.from date then pray for it to help them , then at the end of the day they eat it hahahah

@@bestryfulhd2102 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Glad you enjoy it!

Specially when history is very well reported. Very good job.

@@HistoryMarche keep the great work my brother❤️ and do some more Islamic history this plz. We need fair and open minded historians today.

Except when he portrayed the Angel Gabriel as a roman blond white man :P

I don't know, to me it sounds like the Meccans were demonised by HistoryMarche at every available opportunity. Events told from the Muslim perspective are stated as absolutes, whereas with the Meccans we are given "in their mind" or "they thought", separating perception from reality. The matter of honour, when raised, is treated almost as if the sole individual stating it is the only one concerned, when given the importance of honour in Arab culture, it is no small thing to be concerned about. There's also an element of derisiveness when it is made mention, and more than once, of the Quraysh fearing loss of power. Why is this fear wrong? What group, if they can help it, willingly gives power to a rival? If you think it didn't try to side with any group, so be it, but the video literally describes one side as the enemy and attacks them at every moment. It is still however a well made video.

Nice to see history channels supporting each others!

Hey Hikma, great working with you on this one!

Masya Allah...Great job!

thank you for your effort on this video

Excellent writing paired with excellent production. What an amazing video

True man.

This is just the beginning, people's minds will change in the end.

Great additional detail, thanks!

That’s true

@@mahdih2141 curse on you.

May ALLAH guide you to right path ameen suma ameen

yep - thanks for clarifying this for everyone - or in other words the presecutor firawn

That’s obvious

Hisham is Abu Jehel, right?

@@jafro8 not so obvious to non muslims

@@captainsuperbatpoolstrange7317 yes, i didnt even actually realize until when he mentioned ye was called the faraoh of the era. I'm so used to only saying abu jahl

Thank you so much 😀

Why did he not say that prophet Muhammad peace be upon him came to complete the past scriptures as a continuation and did not bring a new religion

@@visualhadiths9924🤣

@@HistoryMarche make video about battle of uhud and battle of motah

Well there is a lot of details lost, like when Muslims were banned in Makkah and even died of starvation and they were not allowed to be traded with and get married and many tortured to death and their homes were taken and all there wealth more details about the trade from Makkah later on and how hisham was killed by two kids when they really wanted to fight with the army. And a lot more but I really appreciate the video because it is very short. So 22 minutes is not bad actually even though it would be better if had more details about the night before Bader and after the battle it seemed very clear Angeles fought on their side as the Quran mentions when the prophet called upon his Lord, that if we get defeated Islam will end and than Allah sent peace and tranquillity and subsided them with 3000 angels.

May Allah bless you in abundance Tamoor Khan I needed to read these words from him❤️

I wish,I were there!!

@Asdz He does, but you shouldn't

Subhan Allah ☝️☝️

Aal-e-Imran 3:123 وَلَقَدْ نَصَرَكُمُ اللّٰهُ بِبَدْرٍ وَّاَنْتُمْ اَذِلَّةٌ ۚ فَاتَّقُوا اللّٰهَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُوْنَ And already had Allah given you victory at [the battle of] Badr while you were weak [i.e., few in number]. Then fear Allah; perhaps you will be grateful.

Bhavisyath Puran contains a prophecy regarding the advent of the Holy Prophet(saw). Maharishi Vyas Muni occupies an emminent position among the Hindus because of his vast knowledge and wisdom, and God-given capabilities. In addition to other religious literature, he has written 18 Puranas such as Brahma Puran, Bhagath Puran. The 18th Puran is named Bhavisyath Puran. It contains prophecies pertaining to the future. According to the beliefs of the Hindus this book contains Divine revelations and prophecies. This Bhavisyath Puran contains the following prophecy regarding the Holy Prophet: A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)

Ofcourse

Thank you very much for the generous support! Very kind of you.

Thank you for watching :)

@@HistoryMarche please tell us if the Hannibal series will continue. It's been 7 months. :(

@@marine4814 Yes it will. Working on 2 scripts for Hannibal

@@HistoryMarche Thank you! I can sleep in peace now! :)

@@marine4814 Cheers :)

Me too. Iam crying because i feel exactly that our prophet muhammad pbuh was perscuted. Hurted and his followers have been killed but he never called his companions to war until Allah swt gave him the permission to fight his ugly oppressors.

@@djamalmegari6891 "he never called his companions to war until Allah swt gave him the permission to fight his ugly oppressors" You really believe that, buddy, dont you.... Holy f-, you people are gullible.

@@oliveryt7168 i believe and iam certain that our beloved prophet muhammad pbuh never begun a war until god gave him permission and felt that the new muslim society is threatened by pagan arab tribes. Persia and Rome. Do you think all these powers are joking when realising that in Arabia there is a prophet and he is establishing a new faith. Look what Romans did to jesus and his disciples. Iam not speaking illusions. Iam speaking history and facts.

@@djamalmegari6891 you my brother, have not studied well about islamic history. If u studied well u would understand that muhammad waited for years to make himself powerful enough to make an army to fight his opponents and not because he waited for Allah's approval.

@@fxswinger5922 This is the reply from Qur'an itself ( Permission for those who fight because they were wronged and Allah is able to help them. Who were expelled from their homes injustly.....). Here Allah is revealing to his messenger that fighting is prescribed to him and his companions as a self defence coz they were oppressed since a long time and patience is enough for them. Now it's time to stand against injustice. I know about my religion don't worry bro.

Totally Agree. I wish All Muslims United With all their Sects. Just Look When Prophet Mohammad United Islam the Muslims Were the Most Powerfull. In today The Muslims Are spilt. They should United. As the Holy Book Quran: United in the Rope of Allah and not Disunited.

What about godzilla he's pretty powerful

yeah right, your religion is there only because of your warlord prophet.

​@@moebazzi340 not trying to hurt your religious sentiments, but ,muslims were more powerful during the ottoman times

@@alexpulickal1617 fact,,, now we muslims losing badly every where becoz we forgotten allah and floating with haram things 🙁

With all respect, Ali ibn abu Talib is the greatest warrior in the history.

@@lianshahafcan9579 It's Ali ibn Abu Talib, not Taliban.

@@adnanhussain4699 lol bro, with all the news about Taliban, they have worked their way into my autocorrect.

@@lianshahafcan9579 Ali ibn Abu-Talib was one of the greatest warriors in the Islamic history but Khalid ibn Al-Walid is the greatest warrior hands down "Women will no longer be able to give birth to the likes of Khalid bin Al-Waleed" -Abu Bakr

Best is khalid bib walleed

One of the authetic sources said that, the Muslims army at that pre Islamic time fought with all what they have because they are not well-equiped, not so weaponised for their lacks of fiscal and wealthy. They almost equipped with a farmer's tools such as axe, shovel, sickle and with their sincerely truthfully faith to against the superior enemy army until they gained the victory.

Muslims were always outnumbered and less equipped in all of their early battles and they won most of them

The battle of Gibraltar is an example, 3000 soldiers facing 10,000 Visigoths, the commander burned their boats to prevent retreating and in the end, they won

@Абдульзефир the fact that Muslims call one another brothers as they fight with absolute faith despite outnumbered greatly seems to resonate with the Imperium of Man than Tzeentch.

@@erichvondonitz5325Absolutely man. Muslims were outnumbered in all of the early battles. In the Battle of Yarmouk, 15,000-20,000 Muslim fighters defeated 100,000 trained soldiers of the powerful Byzantine Empire and captured Damascus. Most of the Byzantines were killed or flee.

David McCallion

Yes Indeed💙💙

I seriously laughed at that 🤣😄😅

i can feel that LMAO.

😂😂

This cracked me up

Mercy to all mankind sounds very ironical in a video that shows an obvious raid that proofs to be not a defens war and comments full of boasting for Muhammads battles.

@ in what way am i islamophobic?

@@christophsurbeck2814 Chris it 'was' a defensive war. Badr is closer to Madina. The Makkans travelled out to attempt to finish off the Muslims once and for all. They sent approx 1,000 armed men. They thought this was sufficient.

@@voiceglobalinc.6731 i still don't get how my answer was islamophobic. The islamic documents as main sources on this are the Quran, the main hadeeths and Sirat an-nabawiya by ibn ishaq (or more precise ibn hisham). Even with their perspective in favour for the muslims (since they are muslim sources), the provided informations and details are still not obvious that it was correct for the muslims to try raiding the quraishi caravans. The modern islamic explanations i read so far, are theories to justify the caravan raids, but are not as self evident as claimed. It looks rather the like that other views are not welcome on the matter. However, i wish to know why you call me islamophobic.

​@@christophsurbeck2814 I guess you were not aware that most of those caravans were carrying the possessions of the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him AND his followers when they were exiled from Mecca? They were on route to Syria to sell them, right past the Muslims door-step. I don't know what other justification is needed in re-equipping yourself with your own possessions. He assumes you are an islamaphobe, and for good reason too. (Al-though it's not good to assume). Because you have to audacity to say it is not a defensive war when in reality it was by every measure. Every major battle the Prophet was in involved in, he was heavily outnumbered and in almost ALL cases was the one to take up defensive position's (in his own land). You probably weren't trying to be rude, but if you understand the history you will understand what your saying was incorrect bro.

He never mentioned the 1,000 angels that where present at the battle.

google ------------- faithfreedom ali sina challenge google --------- internet archive ali sina debates google ---------- faithfreedom ali sina articles

Yes he missed the angels part.

Muslim preserved each and every order of prophet

Yeah he’s going to make it. A saudi influencer made a shoutout to this channel 3 months ago, and the channel team saw the Saudis comments he said that he’ll make Badr and Uhud battles, so yeah he’s going to make Uhud battle next 😄

@@user-tb5hs6pf2m Well, glad to know that 😁 I'm amused to know that this channel is run by a person, not a team. Really hope that this channel get more views it's deserved.

Bhavisyath Puran contains a prophecy regarding the advent of the Holy Prophet(saw). Maharishi Vyas Muni occupies an emminent position among the Hindus because of his vast knowledge and wisdom, and God-given capabilities. In addition to other religious literature, he has written 18 Puranas such as Brahma Puran, Bhagath Puran. The 18th Puran is named Bhavisyath Puran. It contains prophecies pertaining to the future. According to the beliefs of the Hindus this book contains Divine revelations and prophecies. This Bhavisyath Puran contains the following prophecy regarding the Holy Prophet: A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)

The losses to Muslims army not so significantly loses, its seems like so much Muslims soldiers martyred and suffered heavy injured including the Prophet(PBUH), but the battled end up with the decision about draw as the Musyrikun Quraisy army withdrew from the battle and the Muslims side are struggle to reorganized and treats the injuries and casualties and some of the authetic sources said that the Muslims army led by one of companion of the Prophet, build up the strength then chase the Musyrikun Quraisy army but they are too far away to return back to Mecca.

@@ophirbactrius8285 The prophet who brought monotheism to Egypt and Assyria It was prophesised in Torah

Was it the help of god or the will of the warriors? Instead of god appreciate the power and tactics of the warriors

@@arminalizadeh2616 its both

Can you tell me where?

@@arminalizadeh2616 warriors would have non if god wouldn't approve it

@@arminalizadeh2616 First off without God they wouldn't even be able to kill one of the enemies men, God will provide however you must put some effort. Second off, I dont think you understand how disadvantaged they were outnumbered 3 to 1, some even came with just sticks and only a couple of casualties its a pure miracle they won.

@Ronaldjump u seems like a nice guy, u should start a youtube channel I sure people will love it

Dont SUBCRIBE.his info is wrong.The byzantine army was 150,000 strong.And the Arabs had 15,000 soldiers.The Romans always used large armies to fight their enemy,its well known fact. western historians always corrupt and distort Asian history(mostly out of jealousy).And how the heck will this people get more authentic history about Asians.They didn't live there,and neither did their ancestor.If we Asians start to describe western history then you will see the hypocrisy.

@Ronaldjump "Almost any western historian are unbiased" said no one ever.LOL.British have a sinister reputation for rewriting history,and so does the french.Nepolian had a bad reputation of glorifying his own accomplishment.Almost all western historians are biased toward their own race and will vilify other people's history.Especially if those people were more successful then them.Also western historan cant be trusted about Asian history as there ancestor didn't live in Asia around that time so they will bring info out of their ass.

@Ronaldjump You people should not be trusted with Muslim history,as you are clearly an uneducated Muslim hater.Learn critical race theory first.And stop hurting black people.

@Ronaldjump Western writers are more interested about why Indonesia becomes predominantly muslim, but never say anything how christianity brutally came to my country.

Much respect from a Muslim ❤️❤️

Don't appreciate the muslims but the faith they follow. it is the faith that has made them a true humans.

@@mrsimplym6822 100 % agreed to u

Brothers are true :D I'm a muslim and 6 months ago got robbed by a guy with a muslim name XD Islam is perfect while with everyday more and more muslims are just nominal ones with muslim names and that's it. God knows the best.

@@dogrudiyosun I completely agree. But as far as I concerned, all religions are evil. Fortunately, In Western countries We've achieved religious freedom. Which means, that I won't die at the hands of a fanatic fellow, just because I don't believe in his fantasies. Warmest regards from Argentina.

Бисмилляхи Рахмани Рахим. Потому что эти Курайшиты были многобожниками. Это значит у них был не один бог, а много богов.

​@@justkind777 Bismillahi Rahmani Rahim. I know. Thanks for explaining the joke.

Can you give me the hadith volume

@@nein1046 What is the meaning of Hadith volume? Do you mean Sanad ?

@Riverz Wyte You are the most one who need help, Boy! It's the work of Devils Allah (subhanahu wata'la) say: "They followed what the devils used to recite in the reign of Sulaimān (Solomon); and it was not Sulaimān who became an infidel, but the devils did become infidels, teaching people magic, and what had been sent down to the two angels, Hārūt and Mārūt, in Babylon. And these two did not teach anyone without first having said (to him), “We are but a trial, so do not go infidel.” Then, they used to learn from them that with which they could cause separation between a man and his wife. But they were not to bring harm through it to anyone without the will of Allah.They used to learn what harmed them and did no good to them; and they certainly knew that he who buys it has no share in the Hereafter. And, indeed, vile is the thing for which they sold themselves away. If only they knew!" Al-Baqrah-102

@Riverz Wyte u munafiq

The Messenger of God, peace and blessings be upon him, was truthful

Agreed .. hey bro i wanna ask you a question if you don't mind . is that your real name ? Because i never seen a muslim named Markus .. just asking

في هذه القناة ماذكر تفاصيل كثيرة يذكر المختصرة على سبيل المثال: -كيف عرف ابو سفيان ان في اثنين من الكشافة يلاحقوه؟ عن طريق روث الاحصنة تحسسها وعرف وين راحوا -معركة بدر كانت بين المسلمين وامدهم الله بالملائكة من السماء الثالثة اما المشركين فكان بينهم ابليس بس هو اكتفى بذكر البشر الافضل تقرأ عن تاريخ الإسلام لانه افضل وكتبونا بكل تفصيل كأنك بينهم .

@@abdelrahmanmahmoud7961 I googled it, and Marcus Damon is a character in the Digimon anime. Perhaps he got it from there. Markus is a Latin name from the Roman god of war, Mars.

@@Spacemongerr thanks ,bro

@@abdelrahmanmahmoud7961 Now you can never say an atheist never helped you 😋 Have a nice day!

Hi, A. Criticus, nice to meet you, I suggest you look up Khaled Ibn Alwaleed, he's one of the greatest military leaders in history, Fought about 100 battles or so and he never lost a single one in his life.

@@modi5136 Yeah, I've also read about him. How he was a strong foe, turned into a friend, and then at a certain point even supposedly made a Byzantine General converted to Islam while in a duel. That guy was so awesome.

@@Xaiff Truly exceptional guy.

@@Xaiff wait. The Byzantine General convert to Islam?!

@@Xaiff I would like to know who are your top 3 characters in history so far? cause my knowledge in history is litreally nothing compared to yours, so it'll be very intresting to know your top 3!

How is Iraq now brother

​@@khalidmahmud2347 messed up

Bhavisyath Puran contains a prophecy regarding the advent of the Holy Prophet(saw). Maharishi Vyas Muni occupies an emminent position among the Hindus because of his vast knowledge and wisdom, and God-given capabilities. In addition to other religious literature, he has written 18 Puranas such as Brahma Puran, Bhagath Puran. The 18th Puran is named Bhavisyath Puran. It contains prophecies pertaining to the future. According to the beliefs of the Hindus this book contains Divine revelations and prophecies. This Bhavisyath Puran contains the following prophecy regarding the Holy Prophet: A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)

Much appreciated :)

History is written by the victors. The numbers are most likely exaggerated.

@@theblackswordsman9951 that not true, yes it was the first battle against the qurashi but the battle of uhud was a battle when Islam fate hanged in balance since the prophet was reportedly killed and morale broke within the Muslim army. That battle was 600 vs 3000 and they lost the battle against the qurashi

@@theblackswordsman9951 Most likely exaggerated but it’s also equally likely that the Prophet Muhammad was outnumbered considering the resources of Medina and Mecca.

@@theblackswordsman9951 Muslims know even the name of each one of the muslim soldier of 313 who participated in Badr. During my childhood we used to recite that in a poem about badr

@@sagaramskp There are no texts written about the battle that were made before the 9th century, 200 years after the battle. Anyone who was around at the time of the battle would have been long dead, leading the tale to be warped and shaped by natural inaccuracies of oral inheritance or whatever way the writer wanted. Just because people supposedly know the names doesn't mean it was true or even if they are those people.

No . They don’t accept him a proghet ،. They lied the massenger out of envy and arrogance , they thought that the massenger would come from them from , because a many probhets come from bany israeil ( jewish) like moses and jesus but they don’t believe in jesus . The jewish told the ansar that he will come help him and fight with him , when he come the ansar believed they saw what the jewish told them , but the jewish don’t believed , Except for a few who believed in it . They don’t believe Conquer and envy Sorry my English not that good. Thank you

Jews on there because them is waiting the last prophet also, they knew that yathrib or khaibar are town of prophet from holly book. But alerady know that last prophet came from mecca from lsmail first son of abraham, jews refuse the last prophet. They only want last prophet come from jews from lshaq, second son from abraham. Wallohu'alam

@@agusammar6876 👍👍

@@agusammar6876 in old holy books God never said yatrib or mecca or prophet will come from this race or that He simply said this is the land of black mountains and from here the last prophet will appear it was revealed to prophet moses on his time when he came to mecca for pilgrimage with his people they recognized the land that God promised so 3 men of them left the caravan and start living in khabar those 3 jews tribes were children of these 3 men God never said about from which race the prophet will come there was no reason for jews to not believe but jews were wrongfully excepting him from their race which didn't happen so they disbelieved I may be wrong Allah knows best.

@@thunderbear0 i just explain why jews on there. Because yatrib or khaibar that likely place the last prophet come from or stay on there, both yathrib and khaibar have kurma tree n between 2 rock mountain. Jews is clever. Why jews come to there? Palestine more rich land from yathrib, yathrib is poor town. May be God never said or we never know? You right, I can be wrong also n Alloh always know the truth

We must add that in the Quran Allah says that he sent 3000 angels to help the Muslims and 1000 as backup. And also it must be known that Muslims throughout history HAVE NEVER WON a war where they were the greater numbers. They always win when they are the smaller numbers. The only battle where Muslim had the greater numbers was named "Hunayn" and muslim lost the first day of battle. In Quran Allah says they lost because they liked their numbers and thought they will win anyway.. But the victory only comes from Allah.

just the extremisim stuff is bad rest all is fine and normal

@@nachiketkejriwal9433 Extremists are a problem for every society. Muslims in their early stages fought against extremists (al khwarij). The prophet (peace be upon him) prophesied about them. He said they would outwardly look and talk very religious, but there is no Islam left in their hearts. They’d be be very merciless and would always jump into shedding innocent blood. However in the early history of Islam, you’d not find the "terrorism" theme attached to Islam. Mostly it all started after European colonization of Muslim dominated lands. Specially after the establishment of the Zionist State of Israel in Palestine. Oppressive regimes always try to tarnish the name of freedom fighters by calling them terrorists or something bad. So, yes we have real terrorists, but no where near to the scale that has been being promoted. Hope it helps you to understand us better.

I see a lady of culture, if you wondering, i am Mostak ahmed from flcb, a very old fan of historymarche

@@nachiketkejriwal9433 extremism exists everywhere in the world. What’s your point bringing this bs here?

@@jitumostak5902 Assalamu Walaikum brother. Hope we see more of each other in such videos then.

Islam was the newest monotheistic religion at the time. It took a lot from Christianity and Judaism.

@@JohnDoe-sw1rs Islam preserved those teachings in the Bible which were not corrupted and nullified and corrected the corrupted teachings.

@+Moshe Eikman+ Then what are you doing in a Muslim video

Bible is full of errors in it's historical and scientifical explanation. But Quran corrects Bible. It doesn't contain any of those errors from Bible. For a minded man this proves that Quran is not at all copied from Bible, rather it corrects Bible. But but but it tells what happened with all previous prophets. Including Jesus, bcz simple he is a real person and a real prophet. After Jesus Christian's made Christianity as we're seeing today. But Jesus never claim himself as he is God rather he is a prophet sent by God "Jesus said: that they may know you are the only true God (Aramaic# Allah in Arabic also same) and Jesus Christ who you sent) this is exactly what we beleave. Although Jewish people refuse him. PEACE BE WITH YOU.

I am 100% sure ans know what IAM talking. But just ur brain can't grap this information. This is ur problem not mine. U will may understand if you research open-minded. Only if you want.

May Allah Almighty guide you and your loved ones onto the only right way of life - ISLAM. Peace my brother❤️

Asalamu Alaikum! Stay safe and happy in Mexico ♥

I am just about to watch Fornovo on K&G! I was waiting for my upload to complete. Thanks for stopping by Dennis!

A day worth celebrating till dawn

King and generals are propagandists

Facts

@@semregob3363 how?