I didn't catch the first mistake xD I was gonna say something about Pilot Tube though hahaha Fairplay for correcting them!

And also no launch control!

Honestly, we don't mind, you've done so much hardwork! Kudos!

@16:02 "CONSUMPTION" (not "COMSUMPTION")

@@GregJoughin Oh my, the typos. I used a different method for my labels this time and told myself "you shouldn't be typing these, take them from the spell checked doc". And that remains true. DON'T TYPE IN THE LABELS, COPY / PASTE THEM FROM THE SPELL CHECKED DOC (repeating so I'll remember!)

Yes

I thought it was 5 mins like most others 😅

Equinox Turbo from 1980s is also up there

Indeed

@@MrJuggernautishere Man that Turbo documentary is awesome

Ermmm... flow of speech, A; tone, B-. A bit too monotonous.

@@christopherbedford9897 You just wait Chris, soon I'll be talking about rocker assemblies like I'm describing my first base jump.

@@animagraffs this was so good, this is my wet dream 😂 fr tho even driver 61 used this many times. you deserve a lot of views for this kind of effort. liked and subbed already

And music! Dont forget the music !

wow

Yea,holy crap,i Never knew how much areodynamics played a part in F1 Racing,I Was so confused how F1 drivers can Overtake another one thst has the same design.

You don’t have to, ask him

@@Idkwhattoputhere...306 that's the thing, they couldn't not until 2022

Or the hundreds of millions of dollars of constant engineering and testing of an F1 car by each team to hopefully reduce lap time by .2 seconds. $$$ a F1 team has is a direct relation typically in how well they do. That's why the manufactures, as much as the love their driver winning the championship or placing high in the standings, the race teams get money for how well they place in the constructors championship to all build a faster car then rinse and repeat the above.

As another person getting into F1, do you have any recommendations of other awesome videos?

@@mlrnagoraplaystop4555 Mate there's a channel called Brrrake F1 if you want much more detailed and comprehensive F1 content, and the best part is its run by a former engineer

This somehow was for the cars that were from before the new aero regs, even though this video was released well over a year after the new regs were put into place, kinda odd lol. A lot of things have changed since this video, as a heads up

Here here you balanced detail at the right level with great visuals well done

Thanks!

Yes! Im your 69th like

That would make for a great video all by itself. With Colin Chapman sitting there with his mouth hanging open. 😲😦😬😳😱🥴

Well, if you would show this to Colin Chapmen he wouldn´t be too amazed. Guy invented/discovered like half of this stuff.

@@GTFan8899 Uuhhh no. He was ahead of his time but nowhere near the Aerodynamics, Brakes, Carbon Fiber, Tyres and Suspension, Engine and Powertrain, Computerized Systems and Power Recovery Systems. Other than THAT, then yeah... He was all over it. 😖

@@GTFan8899 yeah and Bell invented the telephone but would pass out when seeing what iphones are capable of today

@@Duschbag First F1 car to use a downforce generating wing - Lotus 49 First F1 car to have the engine as a structural component - Lotus 49 First F1 car to use ground effect - Lotus 78 First F1 car with a carbon fibre monocoque - Lotus 88 Electric powertrains, disc brakes, fly-by-wire systems and even computerized aerodynamic and engine development were all a thing of the present in the 1960s. Engineers from back then would probably not have there mind blown but rather just realize that everything about this is logical advancement of the stuff they couldn´t do or thought they couldn´t do back then.

Scarbstech!! Your review is the most important. I'm humbled. I spent the last month and a half deep-searching your twitter feed, among other sources (like f1technical forums etc). I didn't realize when I began this project that everything interesting is hidden behind team secrecy. Without your dedication over the years, this project wouldn't exist. Thank you so much.

I totally got the Scarbs vibe from this video, in fact if you told me it was written by Scarbs I would've said I'm not surprised at all. Makes sense you used his twitter for info

​@@animagraffs ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kpuipm6moKpesKc.html Watch this. Actual F1 engineer with actual data that wasnt public before he put it out there

If you understand how "everything/most things" on an F1 car work then colour me impressed (whatever that means 😆). I know a fair amount about cars and while F1 cars theoretically use similar parts they are a vastly different animal e.g. far more technically advanced, so I found this entertaining and informative.

What an awful year to start watching

@@raffaeledelzior_d_z_2763 why

@@thirdasian8541 so many pilot deaths and bad crashes and title scandals. In one weekend, Roland Ratzemberger and Ayrton Senna died, and Schumacher won the title by crashing into Damon Hill, to make some examples. A new fan could get scared on how dark f1 can become.

and I stopped watching on 1994, when senna died.. honestly I still prefer the more old and rustic cars and racing F1 nowdays doesnt interest me

Старые движки звучали смачнее)

What is a monocoque? I thought that every man has a monocoque. I've never heard of a bicoque or a tricoque.

Bleh

Es un gran video, desafortunadamente tiene varias explicaciones físicas erróneas.

@@al_staveley Y por esa razón el primer 'pinned comment' es para correcciones. Porque Animagraffs es un trabajo en solitario. Soy yo, no más. Y para atraer la atención de las compañías que han creado los autos F1 y sus ingenieros, tengo que publicar mi mejor esfuerzo ahora. Para que vean mi habilidad. He tenido que aceptar la imperfección de mi arte por lo mientras.

no that is incorrect

To its credit, he fucken ripped the car in two, destroying the fuel cell in the process 😂

@@Deniz1923 Actually the fuel cell survived intact, it was the fuel lines that ruptured catastrophically spilling most of the fuel. The dry break joints failed

He said nearly puncture proof

@@factormars4339 : actually he could've said puncture proof without nearly. If it survived Grosjean's crash intact as it did , since the fire was only from the fuel lines and not the fuel cell then I don't know what kind of impact it would take to rupture it. A direct asteroid strike maybe?! :)

@@Montreal95 That would be cool! Add some friggin lasers to the asteroid!

I'm in school, and its around for me. Amazing, I tell you :)

@@monatestays7416 Bro flexed all over him 😭

Why doesn't this channel have over 1 million subs already? You're right, extremely underrated.

this video has such great quality, not even those guys at f1 factories can see air that clearly (jk im kidding but seriously great video for the budget difference)

Thanks!

The comment section's divided about my music! Seems like one more misstep and it's curtains for ol' Jake, I gotta watchit!

@@animagraffs no nö the music ist fantastic. It creates a lot positive Tension. U can't make it perfect for everyone.

What is the music piece played in this video . I’d love to have it to listen to when I drive .

I use Blender 3D! It's open source and has a great community. I highly recommend it. (Blender.org)

100% agree. Amazing stuff

@@animagraffs thanks for that input,I was also wondering what program you were using. Great job, the graphics are excellent. I love the "ghosting/ X-ray " views. This is a level of proficiency I strive for. Awesome work. Also, in Blender, did you use the particle physics, I think it’s called that, for the airflow simulations?

@@shakeydavesr I only use simulations when it's absolutely unavoidable. Crack open the physics sim in blender and you're gonna be there for weeks tweaking things. It just takes so long. I 'fake' everything in the absolute simplest but most believable way possible, whenever I can. Air, water, electricity -- for these things I use techniques like old video games. Simple shapes where the texture/material is what's doing all the work. I've studied "procedural nodes" a lot, where you can use blender's built-in textures like "noise" or "voronoi", and mix them together to make clouds or smoke etc. For the air around the body I studied aerodynamics sims online, and then built actual shapes to mimic those photos. The materials and transparency make it look convincing, but they're just many flat simple shapes to get the contours I need.

Blender The comment I was looking for

yea an 8 speed means 8 forward. 6 speeds dont only have 5 forward gears

@@chips_n_dip4971 he also said in the video 7 forward

Also, it's a pitot tube, not a pilot tube.

@siwy you must have some connection from aerospace domain right??

@@Ankaj777 Yes, I worked as FEA engineer at Warsaw Institute of Aviation

@@Ankaj777 lol i only know why you asked this because i couldn't understand the concept around knots as a unit of measurement and went down the rabbit hole

I was looking for this comment, great video anyway!

Yes, I was surprised Bernoulli wasn't mentioned. Yes, I'm nitpicking. Venturi also deserves an honourable mention.

Yes.

Good catch...

Pronounced Pee-tow.

mechanical airflow measuring device

Yeah, this error took me out of the moment and made me start to question the rest of what I learned in the video. Great-looking work, though.

Was hoping this comment was here already. Good catch.

I caught that, too. 😊

Can't agree more Stuart. I was disappointed to see some people pointing out in the comments spelling mistakes. Yes there was a few technical mistake, when I watched the video I noticed the transmission number amount error, but this is the only one that stood out for me, it was also understandable and a easy slip up to make. Considering the amazing animation , the tremendous amount of info, the technical data was impressive, large and complex. Can't wait to see more videos from this channel.

Good point about F1 buying it off them - I doubt they could do a better job

nice