How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy Explained

  Переглядів 6,804,883

Stand-up Maths

Stand-up Maths

3 роки тому

Buy my book Humble Pi now!
www.penguinrandomhouse.com/bo...
UPDATE: Harvard Book Store have totally sold out.
My talk on 4 February 2021 at Harvard Book Store:
www.harvard.com/event/virtual...
Here is the original accusation against Dream.
Video: • Did Dream Fake His Spe...
Paper: mcspeedrun.com/dream.pdf
And here is Dream's reply.
Video: • Video
Paper: drive.google.com/file/d/1yfLU...
"Matt flips a coin 100 times."
• Matt flips a coin 100 ...
"Holy Craps! How a Gambling Grandma Broke the Record"
content.time.com/time/nation/a...
Number of casinos in the world in 2011: 3,547
www.statista.com/statistics/2...
Roulette records.
www.roulette17.com/stories/re...
CORRECTIONS
- At 09:08 I say “1 in 110 trillion” when I meant to say “1 in 110 billion”. The number on the screen is correct, it was just a verbal slip-up.
- At 25:27 I showed the 118 craps record as “1 in 1.2 × 10^9” when it should be “1 in 2.2 × 10^9”. The voiceover says the correct number.
- I slip and “more likely” instead of “less likely” at 33:47 (I think I may have even been going for “more unlikely”). But everything in the screen is correct.
- Let me know if you spot any more mistakes!
Thanks to my Patreon supporters who mean I can spend [[REDACTED]] hours filming myself trying to achieve improbably things. If you support me, you can get access to all [[REDACTED]] hours of bonus footage from this episode.
/ standupmaths
As always: thanks to Jane Street who support my channel. They're amazing. And I believe they have no opinion on Dream.
www.janestreet.com/
Endless filming by Matt Parker
Editing by Alex Genn-Bash
Some graphics by Ben Sparks
Minecraft consultancy by Oliver Dunk
Music by Howard Carter
Design by Simon Wright and Adam Robinson
MATT PARKER: Stand-up Mathematician
Website: standupmaths.com/
US book: www.penguinrandomhouse.com/bo...
UK book: mathsgear.co.uk/collections/b...

КОМЕНТАРІ: 28 000
@standupmaths
@standupmaths 3 роки тому
I’m not commenting on how many takes that took. But feel free to guess! (And if you must know: the complete footage of every attempt will be uploaded to Patreon. patreon.com/standupmaths )
@hammer313
@hammer313 3 роки тому
I would of had a green screen as a background and rendered a background with a dartboard in post. ;)
@dogruinsmoor
@dogruinsmoor 3 роки тому
I’m impressed that you didn’t screw it up by smiling when it eventually happened... very cool head!
@somerandomweeb4836
@somerandomweeb4836 3 роки тому
I've send you an attempted proof of the collatz conjecture mind checking it out? I need your help with part of the proof.
@TBH_Inc
@TBH_Inc 3 роки тому
It was just one take right? You just got lucky!
@jovaraszigmantas
@jovaraszigmantas 3 роки тому
i assume it is close to 0010(in binary) multiplied by cubic root of parkers square. Right?
@Sparts17
@Sparts17 2 роки тому
"So you're saying there's a chance!" is basically Dream's entire defense, btw. Which is hilarious.
@eldritchbeluga9277
@eldritchbeluga9277 2 роки тому
he's got a better chance at winning the lottery everyday than being innocent
@thenoobypro790
@thenoobypro790 Рік тому
Well… there’s always a chance. Theres a chance that a 1 in 10^1000000000009 will happen to me right now. But it’s not likly to happen
@vwlz8637
@vwlz8637 Рік тому
there's a achance that every particle in my body will quantum tunnel to jupiter but hey
@Sparts17
@Sparts17 Рік тому
@@vwlz8637 BUT IT COULD HAPPEN
@rickysmyth
@rickysmyth Рік тому
Dream is not a Minecraft developer so cant manipulate RNG. He could not change the RNG even if he wanted to. You just don't know the story and how Minecraft works.
@Stonewall42
@Stonewall42 3 роки тому
The missing bracket just means that the rest of the paper, and indeed the rest of all existence after you started reading the formula, is now part of the formula.
@EebstertheGreat
@EebstertheGreat 3 роки тому
)
@nevs0917
@nevs0917 3 роки тому
@@EebstertheGreat THANK YOU
@pvic6959
@pvic6959 3 роки тому
@@nevs0917 _FINALLY_ i can die in peace
@Stonewall42
@Stonewall42 3 роки тому
@@EebstertheGreat (
@QPUNeptune
@QPUNeptune 3 роки тому
@@Stonewall42 ) no
@B3Band
@B3Band 2 роки тому
"I wasn't cheating" "Well, I was cheating, but I didn't know I was cheating" "Well, I knew I was cheating, but I thought someone else set up the cheats for me"
@domenpodlesnik7599
@domenpodlesnik7599 2 роки тому
And people still forgave him.
@mikimosky4109
@mikimosky4109 2 роки тому
🤢
@mhelvens
@mhelvens 2 роки тому
@@domenpodlesnik7599 Sure, it's fine to forgive him, and to enjoy his content. Just from now on, don't trust him to be honest about stuff like this. 🤷‍♂️
@noxXxnocti
@noxXxnocti 2 роки тому
@@mhelvens Dream also has accused another speed runner of cheating. He was proven wrong but to this day has refused to retract his accusation or admit he was wrong.
@ThePenisMan
@ThePenisMan 2 роки тому
@@crypt5129 I really don’t think that video is as definitive as it presented itself to be. Don’t get me wrong, love karl and his work, but this topic is still heavily up for debate. It shed a lot of light on stuff not talked about often, but a lot of the evidence was FROM the guy being accused, hearsay, and inferences. Which is valid pieces of evidence, but there’s still room for plausible doubt I think my biggest problem though is the defense of his reaction to the problem near the end. There is no excuse for how much of a manchild dream was, and the amount of neglect he had for the moderators well being and his fan base’s rabid attacks. He has way too much influence than he knows what to do with and he can’t responsibly handle it
@AlKohaiMusic
@AlKohaiMusic Рік тому
Fun fact; one of the guys who noticed this statical unlikeliness and called dream out got caught cheating by also futsing with the games probability. I guess cheaters recognize cheaters
@m0llux
@m0llux Рік тому
It's all about experience, huh.
@bettercalldelta
@bettercalldelta Рік тому
Since he's a cheater he has in-depth knowledge of the probability stuff so he knows when others do the same
@user-cf9eb7kv5r
@user-cf9eb7kv5r Рік тому
Birds of a feather flock together
@pastashack3517
@pastashack3517 Рік тому
"He just like me fr"
@jimmyjamespwnysux
@jimmyjamespwnysux Рік тому
Takes a cheater to know a cheater
@jes3788
@jes3788 3 роки тому
I feel bad for dream, he can't even go for a 5 minute walk without getting struck by lightning ten times
@imhafzee
@imhafzee 3 роки тому
He struck himself
@mobiusone6994
@mobiusone6994 3 роки тому
If you think that's lucky, wait until you see the five runs that were even luckier than he was by entire minutes
@501thtrooper4
@501thtrooper4 3 роки тому
Dont worry he will win the lottery 10 times in a row to pay for his hospital bills
@semicolon2599
@semicolon2599 3 роки тому
@@mobiusone6994 which ones?
@mobiusone6994
@mobiusone6994 3 роки тому
@@semicolon2599 The top six for the current version of minecraft
@_WhiteMage
@_WhiteMage 3 роки тому
'I'm not saying he's cheating. I'm just saying if the _entire population of Earth played an entire game of minecraft every second for a hundred years,_ he's still many orders of magnitude luckier than any of them would probably have gotten.'
@XCC23
@XCC23 3 роки тому
actually, you're *still kind of understating it* . If the entire population of Earth played *33* games of minecraft every second for a hundred years...
@squibble311
@squibble311 3 роки тому
@@XCC23 why 33?
@XCC23
@XCC23 3 роки тому
@@squibble311 dream had 33 runs in which he started killing blazes.
@XCC23
@XCC23 3 роки тому
@Aquaintence Buddy Yeah. That's mostly just a rounding up to make a better upper limit + making the math nicer, but the speedrun vs series of six streams is an actual difference.
@ghifari77
@ghifari77 3 роки тому
"Well, dream is a god then" - Dream stans
@hoi-polloi1863
@hoi-polloi1863 Рік тому
My probability class did an exercise... they had one student flip a coin 100 times, and another student was told to just write down H&T randomly, without any props. Professor claimed that he could tell which was the true random series from the coin, because the student doing it by hand would be too shy to put in appropriate-length strings of heads (or tails) in a row. It was a neat game!
@lanachiu793
@lanachiu793 Рік тому
ZzZzz
@baritonesax245
@baritonesax245 Рік тому
thats really interesting!
@hoi-polloi1863
@hoi-polloi1863 Рік тому
@@baritonesax245 It's been a while, but as I remember, you expect a string of log base 2(# flips) of heads or tails in a row somewhere in the sequence. The fake random sequences never had more than 2 or 3 HHH or TTT, even for 100 flips.
@helderboymh
@helderboymh Рік тому
Numberphile did a video on this called randomness is random. Where the host does 20 flips in his head and writes the down and the other person tries to predict what he picked.
@EmbeddedSorcery
@EmbeddedSorcery Рік тому
Me: 50x T, 50x H
@FuneFox
@FuneFox Рік тому
that mathematician dream hired is the equivalent of a lawyer having to defend someone who committed murder in front of the judge.
@flouride
@flouride Рік тому
not really
@gyanprakash7445
@gyanprakash7445 Рік тому
@@flouride technoblade is burning in hell btw
@nubs2234
@nubs2234 Рік тому
@@gyanprakash7445 nice bot
@skipelen
@skipelen Рік тому
@@gyanprakash7445 fr
@gyanprakash7445
@gyanprakash7445 Рік тому
@@nubs2234 cope
@keyboardstalker4784
@keyboardstalker4784 3 роки тому
Dream when he’s walking down the street and suddenly wins the lottery while simultaneously getting struck by lightning and then is eaten by a shark:
@davidpark2854
@davidpark2854 3 роки тому
Funnily enough this has similar odds to what dream accomplished in his "speedruns"
@jasonlewis4438
@jasonlewis4438 3 роки тому
Odds of Winning the Lottery: 1 in 302.5 Million Odds of Getting killed by a Shark: 1 in 264.1 Million Odds of Being struck by Lightning: 1 in 500,000 Multiplied Together: 1 in 2.5 * 10^23, which is just 1 order of Magnitude less likely than Dream's luck.
@keyboardstalker4784
@keyboardstalker4784 3 роки тому
@arrsea not by much, it’s actually pretty damn close.
@DennisEldrup
@DennisEldrup 3 роки тому
@@jasonlewis4438 Winning the lottery is definitely not "just" 1 in 302.5 Million, so you could easily pick a lottery with a more favorable chance of winning, making the original statement true. By doing that you would have made the joke better, instead of trying to ruin it :-(
@jasonlewis4438
@jasonlewis4438 3 роки тому
@@moa-wg3bo What if he scratches a lottery ticket out while he's swimming when there's a storm going on?
@TheB3
@TheB3 3 роки тому
"154 dice rolls in a row without getting a 7" Whenever the stupid robber is on my bricks in Catan, it feels like we've broken this record...
@GDColon
@GDColon 3 роки тому
LOL i can totally relate to this one
@Twigpi
@Twigpi 3 роки тому
I feel your pain 😂
@drachenhexer
@drachenhexer 3 роки тому
that's so true
@mcvibing2785
@mcvibing2785 3 роки тому
@@GDColon hello
@elie_
@elie_ 3 роки тому
so glad I read your comment! You're not alone...
@AstrumG2V
@AstrumG2V 2 роки тому
This is my 4th time watching this, and I'm now noticing how hard Matt has to keep down his excitement every time he nailed one of his trick shots 😂
@caspervandenakker
@caspervandenakker 2 роки тому
glad to know I'm not the only one constantly rewatching this
@ArDeeMee
@ArDeeMee Рік тому
Well, that‘s the exact feeling why we even bother with trickshots. The endorphin rush when it finally works. It‘s sooo good. =)
@SuperYoonHo
@SuperYoonHo Рік тому
@@caspervandenakker me 2
@nikolozgilles
@nikolozgilles Рік тому
360 NOSCOPE
@bhaskar08
@bhaskar08 Рік тому
I thought they were two different videos rotascoped together. Because you never see his complete arm. Both are hiding below the frame and then bam, a trick shot.
@priestofsyrinx4931
@priestofsyrinx4931 2 роки тому
Fun fact: 1 in 2.0x10^22 is like 1 millimetre in 2000 light-years.
@uselessdegenerate7565
@uselessdegenerate7565 Рік тому
@@threemetreydog cringe
@DragoX25
@DragoX25 Рік тому
Thanks for the enlightenment
@yourfavoritezoomer9104
@yourfavoritezoomer9104 Рік тому
DAMN. That really put that in perspective. For reference, the diameter of our solar system from one side of the oort cloud to the other is about 1.5 light years. Basically, you could select a millimeter at any point on a line drawn between the surface of the earth and another point hundreds, if not thousands of star systems away, leave a marker on it, and the odds of randomly picking that point out of any other point would be dream's luck.
@bt-a4622
@bt-a4622 Рік тому
is that a green day reference
@fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223
@fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223 Рік тому
jesus 1 millimeter in 2000 lyrs. thats like the visible spectrum visualized as a strand of hair compared to the distance from new york to los angeles
@PracticalEngineeringChannel
@PracticalEngineeringChannel 3 роки тому
Obviously, the talking head scenes were shot in reverse and dubbed.
@standupmaths
@standupmaths 3 роки тому
No comment.
@reddragon3132
@reddragon3132 3 роки тому
Dubbed? Pretty sure Matt just learnt to speak backwards
@awpmerst
@awpmerst 3 роки тому
@@standupmaths commenting 'no comment' :O
@Tom_Tom_Klondike
@Tom_Tom_Klondike 3 роки тому
No reply
@WhoWatchesVideos
@WhoWatchesVideos 3 роки тому
I guess this is why you're Practical Engineering, not Practical Performance Art
@whatdamath
@whatdamath 3 роки тому
If only this video came out about 8 years ago when I was trying to present my thesis on "Teaching Math with Minecraft"
@thefacethatstares
@thefacethatstares 3 роки тому
hi anton :)
@kebeiwjwgseywgw5590
@kebeiwjwgseywgw5590 3 роки тому
hello wonderful person
@Sipwipbip
@Sipwipbip 3 роки тому
Hiii
@hahaplease97
@hahaplease97 3 роки тому
Lol Anton, you're here too. I actually like watching your astronomy videos alot.
@livintolearn7053
@livintolearn7053 3 роки тому
Woah didn't expect to see you here, Mr. Universe Guide
@Packbat
@Packbat 2 роки тому
...why are people in the comments still trying to argue that Dream could have just gotten lucky? He admitted to having run on a modified client months ago.
@NickersonGeneral
@NickersonGeneral 2 роки тому
From what I can tell, it's separated into two camps. Those who didn't know dream admitted to it, and those who know he admitted to it, but think there's still a case to be made that this COULD have been luck.
@grondlegger939
@grondlegger939 2 роки тому
@@NickersonGeneral No, that's impossible.
@milyah
@milyah 2 роки тому
@@grondlegger939 reread the comment 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
@ViceroyoftheDiptera
@ViceroyoftheDiptera 2 роки тому
We should be doxxing dream and trashing their home for this.
@deforesttthompson9299
@deforesttthompson9299 2 роки тому
Weather he admitted it or not, the argument from probability is fallacious. If the video was about how he admitted it, it would be be a different story.
@Living_Murphys_Law
@Living_Murphys_Law Рік тому
As a Minecraft lover, hearing you describe the process to beat the game made me realize just how strange this game is.
@CaptainCuttlefish74
@CaptainCuttlefish74 9 місяців тому
It's like listening to your parents try to explain your hobbies to their friends
@notakirakarakaza2118
@notakirakarakaza2118 7 місяців тому
To be fair, as far as video games go, "get gear, go to hell, get item, make item, go to weird hell, kill dragon" is pretty straight forward. But i do get what you mean.
@ravingtac0896
@ravingtac0896 7 місяців тому
I remember trying to explain the plot of xenoblade to a friend, very difficult
@eldritchomen
@eldritchomen 6 місяців тому
​@@notakirakarakaza2118 errrrm akshually the end is probably heaven 🤓 Say that as a joke since it's up to interpretation but like if you think of it as an interpretation of a barren kinda heaven that can only support strange life truly alien to our dimension it feels way more sensible, especially bc man have you seen the MC Dungeons ender creatures??? Biblically accurate angel lookin asses one of them mfs has a FLAMING HEAD and another is COVERED IN EYES
@NoriMori1992
@NoriMori1992 6 місяців тому
@@notakirakarakaza2118 The _details_ are weird though. Anything can sound normal if you describe it in the broadest possible way.
@faithnfire4769
@faithnfire4769 2 роки тому
And this friends is why you trust mathematicians who will put their name on their papers, rather than random, unnamed, and unknown astrophysicists. Cause only one of them will willingly admit/defend when they bodge a paper.
@calredwine7001
@calredwine7001 2 роки тому
^^^
@mellamojeff458
@mellamojeff458 2 роки тому
this was a reason i gave to his rabid fans when i told them how research and finding reliable sources to work with is the best chance of dream being right however it turned out dream literally just hired someone to do incredibly bad math and came from a wix website made a couple weeks prior to this event that still had its watermark of wix on it
@MrEdrftgyuji
@MrEdrftgyuji 2 роки тому
Wrong. Never trust authority. Trust the rules of mathematics and read what they write, not who they are. Putting blind trust in people just because some university said they can put letters after their name is just stupid. And a cause of a lot of the issues we see in the world. In the dream case , the mathematics is simple. You can work it out yourself with a calculator.
@diekritischestimme
@diekritischestimme 2 роки тому
It's not enough for the scientist to put his name, considering all the potential conflict of interests in the real world, when it is not about Minecraft, but medical statistic justifying lockdowns or the lethality of a virus. In fact, I would say that only independend scientists are real scientists, everyone else is a scientific prostitute creating the numbers which are wanted by his clients. (the people who order the study to prove their ideology correctly)
@Lo33y_
@Lo33y_ 2 роки тому
Funnily enough, the scientist did redact the initial paper saying that there were alot of mistakes, mainly due to not understanding the game. Which makes sense. And btw he didn't want to put his name on the paper cause he didn't want to get public backlash from it, and lets face even if dream was innocent and the paper just proved it, he still would get alot of backlash. And in a time where having a job is so important and finding work is incredibly difficult think it's fair to want to stay anonymous to stop people calling for you to get fired, which does happen.
@doggobind
@doggobind 3 роки тому
To put that kind of "luck" in perspective, flip a penny 13 times, and if it lands on heads on all 13 times, go buy 3 lottery tickets with 1/1000000 chances of winning, if you win all 3 lottery tickets, that's the kind of luck dream would have had to have to pull that off legitimately.
@ccf3294
@ccf3294 2 роки тому
This comment needs more love. Jesus Christ the maths there.
@acxesta2
@acxesta2 2 роки тому
@@binomial3837 No. 1 in 7.5 trillion was actually the upper bound on the chance that ANYONE would ever get Dream's luck on any set of runs. For just a random session of 6 livestreams, to get Dream's luck, it's closer to 1 in 10^22.
@kingofgrim4761
@kingofgrim4761 2 роки тому
@@acxesta2 yeah they made it much “better” luck wise for dream and it was still no where near probable LMAO glad he finally admitted
@leadmaxwellarco2574
@leadmaxwellarco2574 2 роки тому
In a row i assume?
@kingofgrim4761
@kingofgrim4761 2 роки тому
@@leadmaxwellarco2574 yes that’s what it was saying.
@charlesboudreau5350
@charlesboudreau5350 Рік тому
I love the unspoken fact throughout the video that so many shots were filmed in order to get those perfect odds-defying results, like the book throw, the consecutive ball hoops, the dice pairs falling in the results in the right order. Subtle, yet entertainingly on point.
@XCC23
@XCC23 Рік тому
It's a beautiful illustration of the question. Because I note that no one sees this and thinks matt legitimately did all that in one go. But it's way more believable that matt did that than Dream's result.
@Jaburu
@Jaburu 5 місяців тому
how is that subtle? lol
@guildmenu9697
@guildmenu9697 2 роки тому
just for perspective, for the 10 billion human second century thing, it would have to take roughly 650.22 centuries for just a SINGLE occurrence of what happened to dream.
@tes-cl3ru
@tes-cl3ru Рік тому
How did you work that out? (just curious have yet to take a class in statistics)
@XCC23
@XCC23 Рік тому
@@tes-cl3ru it's actually just almost straight arithmetic at that point. The probability of getting Dream's result is about 1:2*10^22. The 10BHSC is about 3*10^19 By multiplying these two numbers (raw probability and number of attempts) you get a new expected value, which is something along the lines of 1:650 (1:666 with the numbers I just provided) So you're going to need 650 of those centuries to expect it to happen once. Or alternately for attempts to be even faster. Or the population to be higher.
@Skorpyotnt
@Skorpyotnt Рік тому
Well and if we factor in that it takes more than 1 second to do all the accounted livestreams it would take a couple trillion years for a single occurence. Considering the age of universe we still have a couple of trillion years to go.
@gladosbutstupid8807
@gladosbutstupid8807 Рік тому
@@XCC23 🤓🤓🤓 Nah i’m joking but still kinda sounds nerdy
@stinkopung2914
@stinkopung2914 Рік тому
@@gladosbutstupid8807 so you mean someone doing maths is sounding nerdy? What are the odds of that?
@yonko_Z
@yonko_Z 3 роки тому
This reminds me of a quote I saw online from a journalism class. “If one source says it’s sunny outside and another says it’s pouring. Your job is not to cite both sources, it’s to look out the f*cking window and find out which is right.”
@penguins4284
@penguins4284 3 роки тому
This is a pretty good quote
@iDeLaYeD_o
@iDeLaYeD_o 3 роки тому
@@penguins4284 It's an old joke. Not a bad joke as it will always be useful to get a point across but still a joke not a quote (unless someone can put a name to who said it)
@iDeLaYeD_o
@iDeLaYeD_o 3 роки тому
From the weather I had driving home my answer would be, Yes.
@Alistair
@Alistair 3 роки тому
@@iDeLaYeD_o technically it's a quote from whoever created the joke
@lambchop3014
@lambchop3014 3 роки тому
and now a new favourite quote! :D
@sinom_00
@sinom_00 3 роки тому
Joke's on you Matt, I'm here for the maths AND the minecraft
@zidanez21
@zidanez21 3 роки тому
Exactly
@XnoobSpeakable
@XnoobSpeakable 3 роки тому
same
@root42
@root42 3 роки тому
I am here for the Matts and the maths! And a bit minecraft...
@fillthedao
@fillthedao 3 роки тому
haha! you got him! ^^
@Humulator
@Humulator 3 роки тому
same. i watch both a lot of minecrafters and this channel
@AMac8311
@AMac8311 8 місяців тому
Fun fact: assuming there are 7.5e^18 grains of sand in the world (google), it is more likely that two people would randomly pick the exact same grain of sand out of every one on earth than what Dream did.
@jacobp8294
@jacobp8294 6 місяців тому
I handed my dumbass cousin the same grain of sand what's that mean genius?
@AshifKhan-sn6jx
@AshifKhan-sn6jx 5 місяців тому
Idk if the above commenter is saying truth but its more like this Imagine two aliens on space looking at earth The first alien closes his eyes And the second alien lands in a random spot in earth in his spaceship and marks it The second alien comes back and blinds himself and the first alien picks the same grain of from the entire earth and mark it
@lord_ozymandias
@lord_ozymandias 5 місяців тому
@@jacobp8294op specified randomly
@ih21180
@ih21180 4 місяці тому
@@jacobp8294 he talked about this principle of what youve said in the video, with the dart out of the plane
@Shehbaz666
@Shehbaz666 22 дні тому
But... what if it does happen?
@hungrybox
@hungrybox 2 місяці тому
One of the best videos on all of UKposts
@DrowningKraken
@DrowningKraken Місяць тому
Not someone I expected to see here at all. Love you Hungrybox!
@snspi1
@snspi1 Місяць тому
yea
@WhirlwindHeatAndFlash
@WhirlwindHeatAndFlash 27 днів тому
JIGGLY! 💮
@CasuallyShadow
@CasuallyShadow 24 дні тому
Truly, one of THE videos of all time
@The_Horizon
@The_Horizon 2 роки тому
Lol, he recently admitted he faked it
@elusivepotato7922
@elusivepotato7922 2 роки тому
Lmao
@yehwat527
@yehwat527 2 роки тому
Lmao I just saw that on google too
@aswinkrishna5042
@aswinkrishna5042 2 роки тому
Yo Go make more dupes
@aidan7913
@aidan7913 2 роки тому
hello gamer, glad to see you here!
@austindurkin8974
@austindurkin8974 2 роки тому
Well it took long enough, but better late than never I suppose
@ChiralCentre3366
@ChiralCentre3366 3 роки тому
I feel like the Venn diagram of "People who watch Matt" and "People who have played Minecraft" has a larger overlap than you might think...
@hellomynameisjoenl
@hellomynameisjoenl 3 роки тому
I wanted to say …
@christophstahl8169
@christophstahl8169 3 роки тому
yea... its probably a circle :)
@Talaxianer
@Talaxianer 3 роки тому
*people who have played and/or still are playing Minecraft
@Hoolahups
@Hoolahups 3 роки тому
Its a circle inside of a bigger circle
@SushiElemental
@SushiElemental 3 роки тому
I was playing it while watching the video. How likely was that? Well, very.. I was playing while browsing my YT subscriptions.
@krisdoesart9643
@krisdoesart9643 Рік тому
I love the concept of the 10 billion human second century, it's a really great way to put kind of abstract seeming, difficult to comprehend odds into perspective
@mimumi3723
@mimumi3723 9 місяців тому
Just the fact that Dream has paid someone to protect him instead of accepting the low chance raises questions
@toycat
@toycat 3 роки тому
I love when you see a Minecraft event so big it hits the wider UKposts world, including educational content
@khoonmane
@khoonmane 3 роки тому
not expecting to see you here man
@tuple5982
@tuple5982 3 роки тому
It's cool isn't it?
@Guillaume_Paczek
@Guillaume_Paczek 3 роки тому
I love to see my fav maths ytbers getting into Minecraft theory 😁
@dixoncider8372
@dixoncider8372 3 роки тому
Yeah but... this ain’t good for the game at all
@tylerdurden629
@tylerdurden629 3 роки тому
@@dixoncider8372 negative publicity is good publicity
@duckface1038
@duckface1038 3 роки тому
The fact that this man actually went to the lengths to understand minecraft is just wonderful
@sakikogookheng
@sakikogookheng 3 роки тому
I dont think he went out and "understood" minecraft in the sense you're suggesting. It's a childs game with a simple premise, not too difficult of a concept to grasp. Not only that he seemed to have only examined the loot tables thoroughly, as that was what was in question. Understanding minecraft, as you seem to mean, isn't as easy as knowing it involves gathering resources and killing a dragon
@acezaro7927
@acezaro7927 3 роки тому
I think it's ironic because the dude understands so much about math XD
@cylvanus8765
@cylvanus8765 3 роки тому
@@sakikogookheng I getcha... but Minecraft wasn't intended to be a kids game. It's a game for everyone. Not even Notch expected so many kids to be constantly playing the game.
@VisionThing
@VisionThing 3 роки тому
Eh... I don’t play it but “get pearls, kill dragon” isn’t exactly the hardest thing to grasp. A quick look at the loot tables and you are set. Come on.
@saintpoli6800
@saintpoli6800 3 роки тому
@@sakikogookheng You clearly have never gotten into redstone, automatic farms, nor sorting machines. Minecraft, on the surface, is simple... Factorio, is simple on its’ surface- you crash landed on a foreign planet, build factories, build a rocket, then you win. But when you actually get into, it’s incredibly complex and requires math.
@oliknight2223
@oliknight2223 8 місяців тому
This video is now mentioned on Dream's wikipedia page!
@expensivecrayon
@expensivecrayon 8 місяців тому
The 10 billion human second century is brilliant. Really illustrated the point so clearly and made it possible to conceptualist such extreme odds
@gaminggeckos4388
@gaminggeckos4388 3 роки тому
Soooo... 10 billion times luckier than the luckiest gambler ever recorded, huh?
@1088lol
@1088lol 3 роки тому
i must be dreaming forsenCD
@thisuserdoesnotexist478
@thisuserdoesnotexist478 3 роки тому
@@1088lol I had a dream forsenCD , welcome to the champion club
@John.Diaper
@John.Diaper 3 роки тому
YES
@jameshollingsworth3005
@jameshollingsworth3005 3 роки тому
Nah, just extremely cracked at the craft. Definitely no cheating here ;)
@technomage6736
@technomage6736 3 роки тому
Lol 🤣 It's terrible!
@GBloxers
@GBloxers 3 роки тому
"What I'm saying is, if every single human in existence was doing a speedrun of Minecraft every single second around the clock-- every human doing it!-- for a century, the odds are still you would never see a result anywhere near what Dream got." That settles it then.
@MCXL1140
@MCXL1140 3 роки тому
It would take a thousand centuries for us to be pretty reasonably confident that it would happen.
@MCXL1140
@MCXL1140 3 роки тому
@@Lowdian welcome to purgatory.
@DemonixTB
@DemonixTB 3 роки тому
@@Lowdian only if they completed each speedrun attempt in 1 second
@Anzuo
@Anzuo 3 роки тому
It's even crazier, because every human would have to produce 6 Livestreams every second too
@chrism45
@chrism45 3 роки тому
@@DemonixTB The fastest current time to leave the nether after completing all trades is 8:45 by Pluginl. It could be improved but that's a bit longer than 1 second.
@GaidinBDJ
@GaidinBDJ 2 роки тому
Just a note on the odds on those craps runs because your math ends up off because of it. The 154 roll streak was without crapping out (losing) *not* without rolling a 7. There could (almost certainly were) 7's in that run. It could have even been literally all 7's. The number for the losing roll varies depending on the phase of the game you're in. One "game" of craps consists of one or two phases. You start with a "coming out" roll. If you roll a 7 or 11 you win immediately. If you roll a 2, 3, or 12, you lose immediately. If you roll 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, or 10 that becomes your "point" and you enter the second phase. In the second phase, you win if you roll your point number before rolling a 7 and lose if you roll a 7.
@villyintheflesh
@villyintheflesh 2 роки тому
Thanks for clearing that up. I remember trying to learn how to play craps once and couldnt get my head around it, but it definitely was more complex than how it was described in the video
@ekki1993
@ekki1993 Рік тому
Wait, so they were counted as 154 rolls, which would be less than 154 rounds, right? And it sounds like every roll has a smaller chance of making you lose immediately than just "not rolling 7", so the real chances would be slightly higher than what Matt calculated.
@vampire-riley
@vampire-riley 11 місяців тому
this video is older now but having the book land when you flip it behind you at 17:15 is SUCH a great touch when you just finished debunking the incredibly low possibilities of this being an honest speedrun lmaooo
@pangalactictuber
@pangalactictuber 3 місяці тому
And he continues with another minute of commentary without even a microexpression of excitement that he got the book to land.
@etymologynerd.
@etymologynerd. 3 роки тому
Theory: This video was just an excuse for Matt to film a Dude Perfect video.
@username-gf1sf
@username-gf1sf 3 роки тому
I calculated the probability of this to around 99.99999899939993999909998889988899779001%
@JamilKhan-hk1wl
@JamilKhan-hk1wl 3 роки тому
Dude perfect are not because of being lucky but skill and taking many many attempts
@macbookpro3098
@macbookpro3098 3 роки тому
@O.W.I what u refer to?
@VUO4E
@VUO4E 3 роки тому
@@JamilKhan-hk1wl skill? LOL. Time to waste, and lot's of it.
@tempest8342
@tempest8342 3 роки тому
@@JamilKhan-hk1wl many many attempts because they need to get lucky
@lfchjort
@lfchjort 3 роки тому
Matt: "If you're here for the Minecraft, I'll explain the math clearly. If you're here for the math, I'll explain the Minecraft clearly." Me: I'm only here for the beard
@ijones36
@ijones36 3 роки тому
The one thing not explained clearly
@asamenechbayissa553
@asamenechbayissa553 3 роки тому
And u can see it clearly :)
@Lord_Phoenix95
@Lord_Phoenix95 3 роки тому
It's a beautiful beard and I only just got recommend this vid.
@thegamematt7536
@thegamematt7536 3 роки тому
Then he’ll explain- oh wait
@mble
@mble 3 роки тому
Me: I'm here for Minecraft and for the math, what then?
@edgykid4041
@edgykid4041 9 місяців тому
dream fans should consider taking a statistics course after they graduate from middle school.
@szilvianagy2410
@szilvianagy2410 2 роки тому
I can't believe whilst procrastinating on tomorrow's advanced math exam I accidentally come across a video that helped me actually learn binomial distribution and probability calculations 😅 a topic which I skipped cause I didn't attend the classes where it was taught LOL Thanks. Will definitely come back for more videos maybe i'll learn some stuff whilst procrastinating 😅😂
@GodZefir
@GodZefir 2 роки тому
There we go, the cheating actually made something good happen.
@warmike
@warmike Рік тому
how did you do on the exam?
@RajasPoorna
@RajasPoorna 6 місяців тому
What was the probability of that happening? 😂
@neku2741
@neku2741 3 роки тому
This video is basically a "Dude Perfect" video with less yelling.
@benp.865
@benp.865 3 роки тому
an more math
@a17waysJackinn
@a17waysJackinn 3 роки тому
*Binomial Distribution*
@duckface1038
@duckface1038 3 роки тому
I came into the comments to see all the dream stans arguing before I watched the video and I was very confused when I saw this comment
@Mirolp7
@Mirolp7 3 роки тому
Just imagine Dude perfect got his perfect shot... AND THEN start doing the maths how likley the stunt whatsoever was to happen. lmao.
@dr.doppeldecker3832
@dr.doppeldecker3832 3 роки тому
And without the obnoxious music...
@RareEarthSeries
@RareEarthSeries 3 роки тому
Amazing that you got all of those on the first try
@tracefleemangarcia8816
@tracefleemangarcia8816 3 роки тому
Rare Earth? What kind of insane crossover episode are we in?
@nicvizor
@nicvizor 3 роки тому
I’m sorting by newest comment... Just finished your video on pyramid schemes. Can someone calculate the chances of that ahaha
@riograndedosulball248
@riograndedosulball248 3 роки тому
Now i never imagined i would see Rare Earth commenting on a film about the probabilities of a minecraft youtuber be cheating on his speedruns
@catleaf
@catleaf 3 роки тому
it was probably not first try...
@SumeaBizarro
@SumeaBizarro 3 роки тому
He will be in the next GDQ!
@LeoTheDarkAngel
@LeoTheDarkAngel 2 роки тому
The fact that a physicist did the math for Dream should tell you everything you need to know. The number of arguments I (mostly jokingly) had with physicists about how to do maths because they couldn't be bothered to do it correctly is _high_ 😂
@jager8148
@jager8148 2 роки тому
He literally admitted to cheating.
@LeoTheDarkAngel
@LeoTheDarkAngel 2 роки тому
@@jager8148 Basically.
@jordanbell4736
@jordanbell4736 4 місяці тому
For something like forensic statistics/probability, you would indeed want a statistician/mathematician. There are possible subtleties that their training is entirely focused on. A more serious issue is that they didn't want their name on it. If I were hired to write a report as devil's advocate, I'd either decline if there is nothing I could say in their defense or accept and write things that are true but selectively in the client's favor and make the conclusions qualified
@VoltisArt
@VoltisArt Місяць тому
@@LeoTheDarkAngel I think this is not a "basically," but an "actually.' Another comment marked for a year previous to yours said Dream admitted cheating months before that. (As in shortly after this video was released.) In regards to physicists, when an entire category of scientists like to begin sentences with "Assume..." they're going to ruffle math people's feathers, lol.
@Paul-et7wt
@Paul-et7wt 6 місяців тому
I think this video is up for ‘most complete content on UKposts’ awards. It’s beautiful. It’s funny. It’s clever. It’s magnificent. Congratulations Matt.
@somedudeok1451
@somedudeok1451 2 роки тому
The fact that he definitely played on an altered version and then paid a mathematician to create a biased paper, is such a disgusting move.
@deadlock852
@deadlock852 2 роки тому
Probably not a mathematician just a person who understands a lot of math
@jarvis6253
@jarvis6253 2 роки тому
This man?
@wonderpunch4984
@wonderpunch4984 2 роки тому
Dream really doesnt deserve all those subs he has
@sam5992
@sam5992 2 роки тому
That astrophysicist/astrostatistician is probably responsible for a rocket or two blowing up.
@Sampopankki
@Sampopankki Рік тому
I just find it very human xD I find it more disgusting that people need this video to even get close to making sense of the truth while it IS very clear. As we see the math show. I would LOVE for this video to be completely unnecessary proof-wise (nothing against Matt of course), but unfortunately it is not. Cheers.
@-42-47
@-42-47 3 роки тому
Dream: Damn those odds are really unlikely *googles "astronomical odds expert"*
@zh9664
@zh9664 3 роки тому
What?
@VideoMask93
@VideoMask93 3 роки тому
@@zh9664 He's supposing Dream found his unnamed mathematician by searching for an expert in "astronomical odds," expecting to get someone who specialized in odds that are astronomical in the sense of being very high, but instead getting a guy who's into odds related to astronomy...because.
@tuxedosteve9556
@tuxedosteve9556 3 роки тому
@@VideoMask93 but the guy only had like two mistakes from what I heard
@him6008
@him6008 3 роки тому
@@tuxedosteve9556 2 mistakes is too much
@Terrik240
@Terrik240 3 роки тому
@@tuxedosteve9556 Mistakes aren't acceptable, and aren't the same as margin of error. Margin of error covers how much your number could differ from reality due to everything from cosmic interference to human error. A mistake is an incorrect calculation, and has no place in a paper.
@littlemissevel3607
@littlemissevel3607 Рік тому
Imagine being the luckiest human that ever existed... And coming fourth... That has gotta sting a bit. 😬😅
@vonriel1822
@vonriel1822 4 місяці тому
I enjoy coming back to this one every so often because of how evergreen this video is. Despite being focused on what is now a years-old, and largely resolved, controversy, the core of what he's teaching us about throughout the entire thing is just as relevant today as it was then. The inherently suspicious nature of maths chaff, a simple tool of comparison for how likely a thing is in our universe, even simple things like how to understand scientific notation. It's a true masterpiece of a video, and the level of effort that must have gone into it really shines through. And not just because of the impossible shots he made in the background - though, every time I come back, I do wonder how the probabilities of the various shots he took match up to Dream's theoretical odds.
@WR_SEA_98
@WR_SEA_98 3 місяці тому
You know I was trying to understand why I keep coming back to this video. Now I know.
@jaideepshekhar4621
@jaideepshekhar4621 3 місяці тому
Same. :)
@rafigoghimarfirman3480
@rafigoghimarfirman3480 2 роки тому
"After considering this, I ended up finding out that I HAD actually been using a disallowed modification during ~6 of my live streams on Twitch.." -Dream
@luk4aaaa
@luk4aaaa 2 роки тому
I like how he can’t just straight up admit he fucked up and has to victimise himself a little too lmao
@dermathze700
@dermathze700 2 роки тому
@Are You Going To Do The 'Ora Ora' Thing? Yeah it takes a 50 paragraph document for him to say "Oops, I used a mod after all".
@coalblack666
@coalblack666 2 роки тому
@@dermathze700 I just hope not too many kids fall for the “oops.” There’s no way it wasn’t intentional
@KonoGufo
@KonoGufo 2 роки тому
@@coalblack666 It already happened. Look at any comment section on videos that Dream fans watch and you'll see them ALL excusing his actions because he's funny. Or trying to say that things were biased to make him look bad and that it was an honest mistake, even though it's logically impossible for him to pay for a mod that boosts his luck and then forget about it when being accused of having impossible high luck.
@badateverything2931
@badateverything2931 2 роки тому
@@KonoGufo tbh im pretty sure he wrote the mod himself gotta give him credit for that
@RealEngineering
@RealEngineering 3 роки тому
Okay, I played minecraft in like 2009-2010 and I did not understand how someone could possibly speed run that game.......turns out it has changed a lot in 10 years
@d3vitron779
@d3vitron779 3 роки тому
You are now a boomer
@evmc1857
@evmc1857 3 роки тому
Believe it or not, a lot of circuits in Minecraft like or and and gates are very similar to circuits in real life.
@samsunguser3148
@samsunguser3148 3 роки тому
wow
@God-ec8ni
@God-ec8ni 3 роки тому
everything can be speed runned some even speed run life
@bluecrab2
@bluecrab2 3 роки тому
Woah that's awesome @Real Engineering, not many people played that far back. Actually, many versions from those years are missing! There's an entire community seeking lost versions of Minecraft mostly from 2009-2010 so if you could find one in you folders that'd be incredible!
@randyc8771
@randyc8771 2 роки тому
This video is especially fun to watch after seeing the one with Hannah Fry on Bayesian statistics where Matt repeatedly fails to throw a ball onto a table. But now, he *very mysteriously* cannot miss a target! Also, the explanation of the math is superb.
@thebe_stone
@thebe_stone 8 місяців тому
Its like if you flip 15 coins, and they all get hit by different meteors.
@Zexx4
@Zexx4 3 роки тому
So using Math, he basically "confirmed" everyones suspicion...the odds of Dream getting pearls and rods that fast are not 0, but boy it's the closest thing to 0
@angelodc1652
@angelodc1652 3 роки тому
Basically, not zero, but it might as well be
@paulsd9255
@paulsd9255 3 роки тому
As close to the asymptote as possible
@MCXL1140
@MCXL1140 3 роки тому
If every person on the planet lived for a thousand centuries, (that's like pre-development of homo sapiens, to 500,000 ad?) And all those billions of vampires did, in a constant purgatory, was speed running Minecraft over and over. we would expect that one of them would have the experience that dream did... Probably. Lol.
@wilandren65
@wilandren65 3 роки тому
I think this is a lot like intelligent life. It is incredibly rare (by what we know) so it would be extremely unlikely for us to be here. But since we ARE here that kind of messes everything up. If the odds are 1/100000000 then that would mean that us being here could look like “cheating” but since we are here no math could dispute the fact.
@Anankin12
@Anankin12 3 роки тому
ε>0 is the closest thing to 0
@PrimerBlobs
@PrimerBlobs 3 роки тому
My level of excitement when seeing a 40-minute video is a testament to how much I love your stuff.
@youtubeuniversity3638
@youtubeuniversity3638 3 роки тому
Primer!!!
@alexismandelias
@alexismandelias 3 роки тому
You should upload stuff after 3b1b brought you 1M subs
@Cleath78
@Cleath78 3 роки тому
Hey love your videos!
@georgecantu856
@georgecantu856 3 роки тому
Yo!
@elijahbuchanan2368
@elijahbuchanan2368 3 роки тому
Well, your videos are pretty similar. Mathematics and computers applied to strange real world systems.
@NoriMori1992
@NoriMori1992 Рік тому
Making this video might be the single smartest thing Matt's ever done on his UKposts channel. It's only a year and a half old but it's his second-most popular video, second only to his Dr. Nim video which is 5 years older. And I'm sure it attracted a ton of newcomers from the Minecraft community.
@tomboomeronacrv
@tomboomeronacrv Рік тому
It’s also perfectly placed in the timeline of events that happened, adding in a purely mathematical perspective to the equation. It served its purpose of helping explain the numbers further, and thats where it shall stay in history
@farshnuke
@farshnuke 2 місяці тому
I failed maths GCSE in secondary school and had to redo it in college where I barely passed. I understand on an intellectual level that maths is genuinely beautiful in its order and magical in its ability to be strange and chaotic. It is the backbone of science that I love and the lore behind scifi sometimes relies upon maths to backfill the details from the stuff made up on the fly to suit stories. I am talking here about how nerds know how warp drive works, how fast the different ships go in different eras and how many shuttles and torpedoes Voyager had and used. The maths isn't what you do but it's there as a background. Then there's the maths of how games like Minecraft are coded. How you can enter the same seed and the world will generate in the same way (at least to a certain extent. I'm not sure if there comes a point where the generation has built on generation enough that two worlds with the same seed are different). I have been watching videos from James Hoffman this past Christmas about coffee and that involves maths, videos about chemistry from Nile red and that involves maths. On a more practical level I've been playing Fallout 4 with mods and had to come up against the mathematical limitations of the code and my machine. All this to say I am bad at maths and while I respect its role in the things I love I hate it because I suck st it. The first time I can remember having a panic attack it was because I was in an advanced GCSE class about some kind of maths and my impression was that we were being told to divide in a way that made numbers bigger and my brain could not cope. In hindsight it was probably phrasing i.e. that if you cut a log in half say you end up with two bits of wood so it's phrasing as dividing but was actually multiplication. At the time my brain just melted down. I came to this video for the Minecraft but not knowing or caring who Dream is and not liking maths. I loved the video and you explained it well. Though my idiot brain still says that it doesn't seem that unlikely to get drops that to my idiot brain don't feel that egregious. I am bad at maths so I know I am wrong but it's interesting that even after my video my brain is going "I don't know though..." Lol i like what you said about it being the difference between deliberately throwing a dart from a plane to hit a bullseye and throwing a dart from the plane, it landing point down and you then drawing a bullseye around it because as someone bad about maths I only know about probability when it's improbable. Stories are not written about the predictable. Videos are not made talking about the usual so to my brain a once in a lifetime occurrence feels like it happens regularly. I've watched ocean liner and engineering disaster videos where the videos are made because the metaphorical dart from the plane landed face down where a bullseye could be drawn. They were random spikes in the broth of chaos that happens all the time but were singled out as different from the broth and my perception of plausibility comes from seeing so many of these rare spikes. Tldr great video subscribed
@Nick-78
@Nick-78 3 роки тому
Dude holy crap. Like, I look at “getting 42/262 when 12/262 is the drop rate” and think “eh that’s lucky but doesn’t seem insane” until you actually do the math on it. That’s bonkers.
@XCC23
@XCC23 3 роки тому
Yeah. The intuition that's important to have is that doubling the amount of trials obviously doubles the mean, but it doesn't double the standard deviation (how much we expect something to vary) It only multiplies that by the *square root* of two. So when if you have *four* times the amount of trials, you only get twice the deviation, even though the mean is four times as big. So suddenly this relatively small deviation (in absolute terms) becomes a completely unsurmountable mountain.
@androsp9105
@androsp9105 3 роки тому
@@XCC23 I know you're right but intuitively it still feels like the odds should be similar to getting 4/26 when you expect 1/26.
@polendri4812
@polendri4812 3 роки тому
Funny thing is, that same intuition is why we know about the cheating: the hacker knew they couldn't make things TOO lucky, but they used their intuition instead of crunching the numbers and they inadvertently made a change drastic enough to expose them. What this makes me wonder about is how many other, smarter cheaters may be out there, manipulating game probabilities just by a standard deviation here and there, gaining an edge while maintaining plausible deniability.
@XCC23
@XCC23 2 роки тому
@@Alec____ how many heads do you expect to get if you flip a coin once? 0.5 If you flip a coin 100 times? 50.
@nyahnyahson523
@nyahnyahson523 2 роки тому
@@polendri4812 Well, you do have to keep in mind that for every game they play they need to make sure the standard deviation is going to even out. If Dream had used the hack for a small amount of runs, it easily could've been chalked down to luck.
@terryrexford6335
@terryrexford6335 3 роки тому
That slight smile he gives when he realizes he got the take.
@cameronvalencia6023
@cameronvalencia6023 3 роки тому
No no as a S-U M stan, I can 100% with certainty confirm that was his first try attempt, he is simply that lucky. Ur a negative h8r looking for clout. It's possible among millions of ppl to throw a dart at a board that one will get it on their first try. Have u not seen endgame? Its possible. (Wow that felt terrible, this is just a joke)
@user-cm1mc4qv1e
@user-cm1mc4qv1e 3 роки тому
@@cameronvalencia6023 had me in the first half.. haha.
@ez_is_bloo
@ez_is_bloo 3 роки тому
@@cameronvalencia6023 I can literally see a 12 year old typing that lmao
@gfehk2528
@gfehk2528 3 роки тому
well its a magnet so
@MrSayines
@MrSayines 3 роки тому
Maybe there is a second person off camera grabbing the ball he throw when it goes offcam and drop a second ball off cam in the basket :D.
@christiansmith8965
@christiansmith8965 2 роки тому
I love how indepth your efforts are in explaining this while managing to keep the over all ideas in layman's terms. Brilliant. I want to make two comments because of it. (Appologize if my first thought isn't well explained but I will attempt to do my best.) 1) It reminds me about highschool math and how if is often harder to add ideas/areas together is often harder than trying to take the larger shape/upper bound and substract from that to prove your result. Your method reminds me of that because I remember always forgeting to think about that option in working an idea out. 2) It makes me wonder what is the LUCKIEST EVER event an individual has achieved (both proven and/or unproven) to have existed. Anyways, thank you for the video.
@BadWebDiver
@BadWebDiver Рік тому
The guy who survived both atom bomb drops in Japan would be up there.
@TheJJZeeman
@TheJJZeeman Місяць тому
Hey I did not expect to sit through the entire video. Now I'm glad I did, and I even ordered a copy of Humble Pi! This year I've been assigned to teach Pre-Calculus/Calculus courses and I've rekindled my love of maths. Thank you for doing what you do!
@Adderkleet
@Adderkleet 3 роки тому
I can't tell if the book-toss was: 1) Good enough to count, no more takes, just move on. 2) Better than intended, since it didn't slot into the others but it's upright and fully visible. 3) Exactly as intended.
@tbpotn
@tbpotn 3 роки тому
I was wondering the same, im gonna go with 2 haha!
@tttITA10
@tttITA10 3 роки тому
1. Definitely. It almost sloted perfectly: should that not be the objective, it should have had become the objective.
@spusho
@spusho 3 роки тому
Its always 3
@thomdendk4478
@thomdendk4478 3 роки тому
@@spusho Exactly
@LadyPelikan
@LadyPelikan 3 роки тому
17:16 if you missed it (like I did...)
@alexfall9622
@alexfall9622 3 роки тому
"As an expert in getting things wrong" The Parker Square will follow this man to his grave.
@olik136
@olik136 3 роки тому
a grave that is almost a perfect rectangle... almost (*not sure what a perfect rectangle actually would be...)
@brendanmccabe8373
@brendanmccabe8373 3 роки тому
@@olik136 a square
@ViliamF.
@ViliamF. 3 роки тому
pretty sure he'll have it on gravestone. either engraved or graffiti-ed.
@Frahamen
@Frahamen 3 роки тому
@@olik136 I'll say it's a plane figure with four perfectly straight sides and four perfectly right angles.
@lichansan1750
@lichansan1750 3 роки тому
And also made him (more) famous
@bilbo_gamers6417
@bilbo_gamers6417 4 місяці тому
I really love the level of detail the speedrunning judges went into for the paper. You call it rambly, I call it Great Effort! genuinely really good work. you did it better but to be fair you are a famous mathematician lol
@ChaossX77
@ChaossX77 Рік тому
The look of pride and satisfaction when he looked to see if he hit the bullseye and saw he finally did is priceless. Plus keeping up the level of expressive narration after that many takes is impressive in and of itself. Just genuinely impressed with this channel especially because I know you do another channel that's way more serious but I can't place atm.
@PersonMan000
@PersonMan000 3 роки тому
Hearing Matt say the words "Ender Pearl" and "Blaze Rods" is a strange phenomenon.
@areh3918
@areh3918 3 роки тому
Gamer grandpa
@theairaccumulator7144
@theairaccumulator7144 3 роки тому
@@areh3918 Stand-up gaming
@Fedico7000
@Fedico7000 3 роки тому
I don't know who this is and even I can tell that it sounds weird when he talks about games.
@Eclipsed_Archon
@Eclipsed_Archon 3 роки тому
what are the chances XD
@JobroskiSwaqqman
@JobroskiSwaqqman 3 роки тому
If you check the description, he has a Minecraft consultant lol.
@kelvinw.1423
@kelvinw.1423 2 роки тому
Respect for the MC Speedrunning Team for making a 29 page formal investigation
@eekee6034
@eekee6034 2 роки тому
Yes, and Matt for understanding why instead of just complaining.
@euanstokes2828
@euanstokes2828 2 роки тому
Yeah it may not be the perfect paper, but man they put the effort in, and that's incredibly admirable.
@ahmednishaal9432
@ahmednishaal9432 2 роки тому
Tbh that first paper was better than what most of us could have provided
@mayo4507
@mayo4507 2 роки тому
That's kinda what you have to do when a UKpostsr has actual stans
@fort809
@fort809 2 роки тому
@@mayo4507 lol the paper didn’t matter to Dream’s fans, he just said “their math is wrong and they’re evil clout chasers” and the 10 year olds believed him. Facts don’t matter to DSMP fans
@AdrianWan
@AdrianWan 8 місяців тому
I appreciated how you made your points without wading into speculation or assigning blame. The human-second-century is a nice way to get some intuition in a very unintuitive range of probabilities. Thanks!
@XCC23
@XCC23 8 місяців тому
One of the beautiful and frustrating things about probability is that everything can look familiar and be strange or look strange and be familiar or look strange and be strange. All you can do is calculate to understand.
@jaydick5344
@jaydick5344 2 роки тому
This is one of my favourites for the simple fact Matt came up with a human second century to make it easily understandable
@RenatoAndrade144
@RenatoAndrade144 2 роки тому
The "10 Billion Human Second Century" is one of the funniest things I've ever heard in mathematics. Also genius in how easy it is to convey to the public at large.
@scientia4866
@scientia4866 2 роки тому
totally agree :D it's a pretty good way to gain intuition!
@jacobburr3570
@jacobburr3570 2 роки тому
What's that mean :o
@javierantoniosilva8477
@javierantoniosilva8477 2 роки тому
Hell, I'm a mathematician and it's really conveying to me.
@kayson971
@kayson971 3 роки тому
It was Dream's big picture all along, he wanted to teach the young people statistics
@irok1
@irok1 3 роки тому
"I'm not very good at statistics myself" -Paraphrase from Dream
@sirjgn4868
@sirjgn4868 3 роки тому
@@irok1 Well, maybe thats why he wanted folks to be more aware than him? :P
@oreoicecream1829
@oreoicecream1829 3 роки тому
@Leonardo #toddyn but the hero we needed?
@The_SOB_II
@The_SOB_II 3 роки тому
Eeuuuuggghhhhh
@kayson971
@kayson971 3 роки тому
@@The_SOB_II Its a joke its a joke xDD
@Gunbudder
@Gunbudder Рік тому
12:20 some added context for those watching this video now, MinecrAvenger was exposed as cheating in the same way! in fact, MinecrAvenger was cheating much more egregiously than Dream and for a much longer time
@Packbat
@Packbat Рік тому
It's bizarre that people are still trying to argue that Dream might have just got lucky when they already confessed to cheating over a year ago. Like, not only are the statistics definitive in proving that they didn't get it by chance, *they themself said* they didn't - Matt Parker is entirely vindicated here. Completely inexplicable. Well, except the part where people are still watching and commenting on the video. That part makes perfect sense, it's great.
@thecuber8784
@thecuber8784 Рік тому
Yeah, it just proves how some people don’t care about facts or research 😪
@frankzander6234
@frankzander6234 Рік тому
@@thecuber8784 also some people actually buy that it was on "accident"
@aorusaki
@aorusaki 11 місяців тому
Yes you're right and I agree. But it's important to note that in general just because something has a chance lower than 1 in 3.1 x 10^19 (like Dream's odds) doesn't necessarily mean it was cheating, but it's extremely powerful evidence if not countered by anything else For example, if Dream performed the Speedrun under supervision, with a publicly audited/reviewed computer with an unmodded version of Minecraft, with etc etc etc security/verification systems in place, then it WOULD have been believable
@aorusaki
@aorusaki 11 місяців тому
And when I say such statistical arguments are extremely powerful, i really do mean extremely. To such an extreme that I'm not even sure if we could design a computer secure enough from any tampering such that the probability of Minecraft being tampered was lower than 1 jn 2.0x 10^22!!! 😂
@aorusaki
@aorusaki 11 місяців тому
So I wouldn't just blindly use this 10 billion human second century argument to try to prove every case of cheating flatout, but use it as a very, VERY good standard that will take a lot of evidence to argue against (which dream clearly had very little of)
@samtarver8446
@samtarver8446 2 роки тому
It's interesting that he probably only increased his odds by a little bit, thinking it wouldn't be noticed, but forgetting that when you do things a lot of times, even a small increase in chances has a large statistical impact
@bruschetta7711
@bruschetta7711 2 роки тому
Excel and taking simple data is so useful, it does make you see how incredibly impossible is what Dream has done
@Packbat
@Packbat 2 роки тому
The funny thing is, the situation in which it *wouldn't* have a large statistical impact is ... the situation in which it wouldn't have any noticeable impact at all. Which, if Dream intentionally modified the game, would make that act of cheating kind of a waste of time - why bother if you can't even tell the difference?
@boiledelephant
@boiledelephant 2 роки тому
I strongly recommend Karl Jobst's video on Dream's semi-confession. It's fascinating. There's a plausible theory that he had modified his Minecraft for practise and didn't know he was *still* using a modified version when he streamed. It raises an eyebrow but honestly he makes a compelling (and very nuanced) argument on the possible interpretations of what is now known.
@zomgneedaname
@zomgneedaname 2 роки тому
Thanks for summarising this video for me
@supernova743
@supernova743 2 роки тому
A slight increase in odds wont go noticed in a single run, the problem he had here was he kept using the mods run after run. In an unmodded game you're going to end up with extremely good luck and extremely bad luck in games. He effectively removed the bad luck games getting to his perfect game much faster and with less effort.
@LittleFifth
@LittleFifth 3 роки тому
I was kinda on dream's side. But then I saw the parenthesis wasn't closed in the papers that sided with him. Unforgivable.
@erronblack308
@erronblack308 3 роки тому
I kinda think he’s stupid
@tiredboard
@tiredboard 3 роки тому
To be fair, even though in this specific context the missing parenthesis doesn't matter, a misplaced parenthesis could result in completely different equations.
@caferace8418
@caferace8418 3 роки тому
@@tiredboard I would assume a professional doing analysis for a paying customer would be more focused on details like that when dealing with math. That's ignoring someone not willing to putting their name on their work.
@kylea.s.5544
@kylea.s.5544 3 роки тому
@@erronblack308 who? Dream?
@brianlam5847
@brianlam5847 3 роки тому
You saying that a world-renowned mathematician would seriously not remember to close a parenthesis? I mean if you dedicated your life to math you would pretty much not make this kind of mistake. Face it; Dream himself wrote it to look better or the "mathematician" does not know what he is talking about.
@Rabid-Bunny
@Rabid-Bunny 13 днів тому
Why is Tom segura explaining Minecraft to me
@tharrock337
@tharrock337 Рік тому
Matt's Method is phenomenal. At least to me as a non mathematician it seems so elegant. Upper bounds are standart in maths I know, but used like this it shows why its useful. There is a fairly brutal dunk in here as well, one that Matt is too nice to go for, but it is completely mercieless. This is too lucky to be true, one person cannot expect to have results anywhere close to this - Well but there is a lot of people trying to get this, maybe if... - No. All of humanity trying wouldn't make this plausible. - But What if people were really dedicated and spent a lot of time trying it? - No, all of humanity wouldn't get this if they spent the next century trying - But speedrunners are really good, they know when a run is not gonna make it, they will just reset, what if Dream was just incredible at optimizing? - No, the model assumes all of humanity is absolutely insane at speedrunning and takes on average a second per run. They aren't taking breaks either btw, not to eat, drink, sleep or work, this is all they do for a full century, and they still only have odds of one in a thousand
@XCC23
@XCC23 Рік тому
It is a fantastically elegant method. But we've gotta remember, it only works because Dream's claimed result is ludicrous. So ludicrous that if we set the upper bound millions of times above the rarest observed event in a game of chance, we still don't catch Dream's result. For anything that's a little bit more reasonable, this method's not going to help.
@claypage1089
@claypage1089 3 роки тому
A mathematician who knows the difference between "uninterested" and "disinterested." That alone is impressive.
@menopriezvisko94
@menopriezvisko94 3 роки тому
hmm what is the difference? sorry i am not native speaker
@augur8261
@augur8261 3 роки тому
Why should that even matter?
@mavenYGO
@mavenYGO 3 роки тому
@@menopriezvisko94 uninterested means your don’t care/not interested. Disinterested means you have no stakes in it, as in he’s not involved in the community whatsoever. Which is why he says he’s disinterested but also interested
@claypage1089
@claypage1089 3 роки тому
@@augur8261 In my experience, most math teachers have poor English skills, and most English teachers are bad at math. Not always the case, but more times than not.
@matthewjohnson5191
@matthewjohnson5191 3 роки тому
@@claypage1089 They might not get structure correct at the same level, but specific words and roots are still essential regardless. Un and Dis are simply useful prefixes rather than anything to do with structure.
@asandax6
@asandax6 3 роки тому
The Dude Perfect team is sweating Nervously right now.
@diogoandre756
@diogoandre756 3 роки тому
Yes, because they changed the probability tables of reality
@bobikoart
@bobikoart 3 роки тому
All trick shots are first try i swear
@Guillaume_Paczek
@Guillaume_Paczek 3 роки тому
LOL
@rungeon83
@rungeon83 3 роки тому
So much yes! Awesome comment :D
@abunchofiguanaswithinterne2186
@abunchofiguanaswithinterne2186 3 роки тому
Unless they say they got it on the first try, they could have had an infinite number of takes before hand.
@kevinelliott50
@kevinelliott50 Місяць тому
This video is like comfort food to me. I've watched it probably 10 times now! It never gets old! Who knew probability and statistics could be so entertaining?
@isamedonnie
@isamedonnie 7 місяців тому
This is such a good video. I still come back and watch the full thing. It’s fun, witty, informative on a nice casual topic. Much love ❤
@Makzul78
@Makzul78 3 роки тому
Can we agree that "10 Billion Human Second Century" should instead be called Parker Odds?
@zidanez21
@zidanez21 3 роки тому
I think we have enough power as an audience to do that
@shambhav9534
@shambhav9534 3 роки тому
Yeah, let's do that. Who will make a Wikipedia page?
@squelchedotter
@squelchedotter 3 роки тому
@@shambhav9534 We'd need someone to publish it in a paper or some other publication
@davidgustavsson4000
@davidgustavsson4000 3 роки тому
@@squelchedotter I suggest that someone takes the opportunity to make it one of those one-word articles: ``` \title{How unlikely would an event have to be to have a 50/50 chance if occuring if every human tried for it once a second for a century?} \subtitle{A new method for judging likelihoods of human accomplishments} \subsubtitle{The Parker probability} \begin{document} \maketitle \begin{equation}\label{p} ... \end{equation} Very (see eq. ef{p}). \end{document}
@davidgustavsson4000
@davidgustavsson4000 3 роки тому
@James R It felt natural. I skipped the actual math though because I'm on my phone.
@Klockorino
@Klockorino 3 роки тому
This controversy has spawned some of the most interesting crossovers I’ve ever watched
@ifyoureplytomeyouregay4293
@ifyoureplytomeyouregay4293 3 роки тому
Next person is Neil degrass Tyson blabbering over it
@jeypi__
@jeypi__ 3 роки тому
u seem familiar
@abrahamlincoln9758
@abrahamlincoln9758 3 роки тому
If it please the court, I would like to admit into evidence, exhibit A: Timothy Dexter read about him. he was the living proof.
@Justaguywholikes69
@Justaguywholikes69 3 роки тому
Why did I read that how yoda talks 🤦
@patavinity1262
@patavinity1262 3 роки тому
What others are there?
@shezario
@shezario 2 роки тому
Had this one on watch later for a while after it kept popping up in the suggestions, completely forgot about it until Steve mold posted today congratulating on the million subs.. well I'm subbed now as well 👍
@andreacazzaniga8488
@andreacazzaniga8488 7 місяців тому
You totally aced it, and you brought back the discussion to the level it belongs. Deep maths and statistics shall not be abused unless necessary.
@SKFSTETSHT
@SKFSTETSHT 3 роки тому
Imagine getting odds better then if ever human for a century speedran the game and only getting 4th fastest run in the world
@danielf.7151
@danielf.7151 3 роки тому
Tbf, he had some bad luck with the end portal. Before that, he was on WR pace.
@xdjrockstar
@xdjrockstar 3 роки тому
@@danielf.7151 that's a shame, he should've set the portal's spawn to be closer
@cheesylasagna823
@cheesylasagna823 3 роки тому
@@danielf.7151 He couldn't have gotten world record even if the eye didn't break, would've been like a 15 or 16 min time
@allesiao
@allesiao 3 роки тому
Thats probably what he wanted, the cheating would be obvious if he would have set the WR
@hunterdog4365
@hunterdog4365 3 роки тому
Lol true
@heloisew4665
@heloisew4665 3 роки тому
As an Astrophysicist I can tell you we shouldn't be allowed to do statistics 🤣
@Kaiasky
@Kaiasky 3 роки тому
Bayesian stats..
@SlavaMironov
@SlavaMironov 3 роки тому
I mean, there's a reason they didn't put their name on there, they knew the paper doesn't hold water
@bubsnicket
@bubsnicket 3 роки тому
Wait, aren't you the people that tell us how likely we are to be wiped out by an asteroid or supernova?! Please check your work right now!
@olivianava5422
@olivianava5422 3 роки тому
My roommate last year was an astrophysicist. Completely agree.
@Supertimegamingify
@Supertimegamingify 3 роки тому
The chances are ASTRONOMICALLY low. That's all that needs to be said.
@ghost20012001
@ghost20012001 20 днів тому
I would be so pissed if the universe gave me that kind of luck for minecraft of all things
@Zeddwolff
@Zeddwolff Рік тому
This video aged very well given that he admitted to having an rng mod
@ighntaemr
@ighntaemr Рік тому
He failed to gaslight his fans now he's force to admit it 😆
@Belial-jv5tq
@Belial-jv5tq 3 роки тому
Thank you Dream for cheating and letting me find this incredible channel which also made Numberphile and Sixty Symbols pop up on my recommended, and now I can't stop watching and learning.
@EmilyYebananapie
@EmilyYebananapie 3 роки тому
This is the best comment I read today. WELCOME TO THE BEST SIDE OF UKposts
@CaseyShontz
@CaseyShontz 3 роки тому
Gotta love a good math communicator
@aji_jacobson
@aji_jacobson 2 роки тому
I found Matt through numberphile a couple years ago and love them both! Would also recommend Steve Mold for more general science vids in a similar style to Matt's. PS Careful about numberphile's video on why 1+2+3...=-1/12, that video has caused more controversy in the math world than Dream could ever hope to.
@mikew1990hello
@mikew1990hello 2 роки тому
Fantastic channels
@TheSuperKingLP
@TheSuperKingLP 2 роки тому
Cry about it.
@Kredige
@Kredige 3 роки тому
Given my watch history of countless Minecraft videos, and every video on both yours and Numberphile's channels, I'm sure the UKposts algorithm positively pissed itself with excitement when recommending this video to me.
@bruciex4574
@bruciex4574 3 роки тому
same
@texasranger7687
@texasranger7687 3 роки тому
same !
@3Ppaatt
@3Ppaatt 3 роки тому
Well put! I love picturing the YT algorithm as an excited little kid handing out videos at random.
@marklemoine1634
@marklemoine1634 3 роки тому
"WE THINK YOU'LL LIKE THIS ONE"
@brooksbryant2478
@brooksbryant2478 3 роки тому
Same
@frizzel4
@frizzel4 Рік тому
For those who think it wasn't on purpose, you're delusional. Why would he at any point have a mod that very slightly modified the spawn rate of speed run specific items? For 6 streams? Obviously he knew and was doing it on purpose.
@isaacmillen8789
@isaacmillen8789 11 місяців тому
For content creation
@NickersonGeneral
@NickersonGeneral 10 місяців тому
There's actually a pretty interesting Karl Jobst video explaining in detail what Dream's official explanation for this is, and honestly it seems somewhat plausible. Long story short the pluggin was for his other videos (the ones where he tried to speedrun minecraft while his friends try to kill him). It was created by a third party Dream had hired to make such pluggins, but Dream never knew of it's existence (because he never instructed the creator to make this specific mod, and the creator realized what happened and got scared their job was in jeopardy if they admitted it to Dream). This leaves out a lot of details that are covered in the Karl Jobst video, so I suggest checking that out.
@spoopsiuwu356
@spoopsiuwu356 9 місяців тому
Im pretty sure it was on purpose but those types of mods are sometimes used for practice runs where you dont want to worry about luck
@redpup112
@redpup112 6 місяців тому
if I remember right (which I haven't followed Dream at all for the past couple years almost entirely because of this fiasco), he said it was for another series he was doing at the time to make sure luck wasn't a problem (as in, ruined the pacing of the video) and forgot he had it on when actually speedrunning. if you ask me, while "I forgot" is essentially a foolproof defense, if I were in a similar scenario, that is probably the first thing that would come to my mind. I'm not saying that it's not true (ask me, I've probably got ADHD and I've forgotten more times than I... remember), I'm just saying that it doesn't feel right to me. I get the same vibe from other defenses, it feels like something I would say on the spot if someone caught me lying or the like. and also, I think that the fact that there are multiple defenses in the first place doesn't seem right.
@madsante
@madsante 4 місяці тому
​​@@redpup112 this is incorrect. He used a plugin for his other series since it was done on a server. Plugins will not modify your game, only that specific server. His speedruns were done locally meaning the mod would have to be a different entity than what changed droprates in his manhunt videos. Ive personally never heard him make this defense either.
@ignus9928
@ignus9928 11 місяців тому
I love the 2x10^22 probability when looking at a "History of the universe dartboard" If you were to throw a dart at a random second on a timeline that spanned between the moment the universe came into existence to today (13.7 billion years), the probability of hitting any particular second of time is 4.3x10^17.... which is still a significantly better odds than the drop rate he got. How much better? well, take the length of the universe and multiply it 50,000 times and throw the same dart. He would have had to hit a specific second of time in a timeline that is 685 TRILLION years long. Another way to look at it, is to pick a grain of sand on the entire globe. There is estimated 7.5x10^21 grains of sand in the world.... Now, double the size of the world and do it again. It's still a better chance to pick that single grain of sand in a world that is twice as large as Earth.
@brunnomenxa
@brunnomenxa 3 роки тому
10:12 The smile of someone who won't need to record the lines again.
@Papaconstantopoulos
@Papaconstantopoulos 3 роки тому
My exact thought
@N.Nocturne
@N.Nocturne 3 роки тому
My exact thought
@dontklickme6455
@dontklickme6455 3 роки тому
My exact thought
@eden7537
@eden7537 3 роки тому
My exact thought
@nonartrachno4900
@nonartrachno4900 3 роки тому
I love potatos
@jayhunter2182
@jayhunter2182 3 роки тому
Dream: "u can't argue with statistics" Statistics: "But we can argue with you"
@muhammadsoleh4725
@muhammadsoleh4725 3 роки тому
Dream Stans: "DO YOU THINK I CARE"
@slimer6023
@slimer6023 3 роки тому
@@muhammadsoleh4725 haha.....
@dmitrygeraskin34
@dmitrygeraskin34 3 роки тому
@@muhammadsoleh4725 true
@vacuostester5828
@vacuostester5828 3 роки тому
@@muhammadsoleh4725 Yeah because they are mentally deficient
@JackoBanon1
@JackoBanon1 3 роки тому
@@vacuostester5828 Dream is?
@JRs_Restoration
@JRs_Restoration Рік тому
Happy 1 million subs ! Great content
@marcocassone5996
@marcocassone5996 9 місяців тому
This video is insanely well done and thorough. Well done!
@VeritasGames
@VeritasGames 3 роки тому
I'm so glad someone finally did a proper, clear, succinct, and entertaining explanation of this. Props mate!
@TRW4.0
@TRW4.0 3 роки тому
its so obv fake same with his man hunt vids ffs i dont hate on him i just enjoy his vids but its obv fake and yall dont want to belive that.
@nikolessard6860
@nikolessard6860 3 роки тому
hi bud just watched all your hot guns vids
@c1a046
@c1a046 3 роки тому
@@TRW4.0 so probability is fake? It was really just pure math, how can it be fake?
@TRW4.0
@TRW4.0 3 роки тому
@@c1a046 he ajusted the probability in the scripts of minecraft?? bit obv
@itsjustleo3371
@itsjustleo3371 3 роки тому
@@TRW4.0 Dream has literally said that they take multiple tries to get the most exciting manhunt, it's not scripted. It's literally left up to probability of about how many tries it takes to get a good take lmao.
@midrangemonroe1
@midrangemonroe1 3 роки тому
"Probability calculations are hard." Q.E.D.
@georgejerry1545
@georgejerry1545 3 роки тому
[insert square]
@mileskuma4448
@mileskuma4448 3 роки тому
⬛️
@arazaratsyan6478
@arazaratsyan6478 3 роки тому
[insert Parker Square]
@alexanderbudianto7794
@alexanderbudianto7794 3 роки тому
Matpat's video be like
@deepstariaenigmatica2601
@deepstariaenigmatica2601 3 роки тому
GEOSQUARE S Q U A S H E D
@georgehelliar
@georgehelliar 2 роки тому
31:00 At a much simpler level, this is like when some very unlikely thing happens and everyone is blown away, thinks it's miraculous, 'what are the chances of that', etc. Yes, but there are an almost infinitesimal number of very unlikely things that could happen, so the chances of one happening start to approach 1. It's only the chance of one particular one happening that are very low.
@morbideddie
@morbideddie 2 роки тому
Good explanation. Probability is a measure of how likely something is and is often expressed as n(successes)/n(attempts). The key thing to consider in these situations is that when you don’t paint the target after throwing the dart you set it so that any result is a success, therefore the probability is 1.
@pabloescobar4029
@pabloescobar4029 5 місяців тому
Because it’s the first time it happens and probably only time it will
Why it’s mathematically impossible to share fair
42:08
Stand-up Maths
Переглядів 1,8 млн
How did the 'impossible' Perfect Bridge Deal happen?
24:55
Stand-up Maths
Переглядів 764 тис.
КАК ГЛОТАЮТ ШПАГУ?😳
00:33
Masomka
Переглядів 2,1 млн
The Biggest Cheating Scandal in Trackmania History
20:30
Wirtual
Переглядів 3,7 млн
The Biggest CHEATER in Pokemon History was Finally Caught
35:55
Abyssoft
Переглядів 2,2 млн
What is the area of a Squircle?
33:51
Stand-up Maths
Переглядів 772 тис.
The Minecraft boat-drop mystery
16:41
Stand-up Maths
Переглядів 807 тис.
Why don't Jigsaw Puzzles have the correct number of pieces?
26:13
Stand-up Maths
Переглядів 1 млн
Why is there no equation for the perimeter of an ellipse‽
21:05
Stand-up Maths
Переглядів 2,1 млн
Illusions of Time
31:08
Vsauce
Переглядів 17 млн
I run untested, viewer-submitted code on my 500-LED christmas tree.
45:17
Dream Reacts To Accusations Of Him Scripting Manhunts and Debunks them
26:20
Dream Team Highlights
Переглядів 4,5 млн
«Хитрый фокус» 🪄 | #shorts
0:52
Филипп
Переглядів 2,1 млн
Как по мнению мамы она добиралась в школу 😂 #shorts
0:23
Владислав Шудейко
Переглядів 1,7 млн
Вихватив собі підкрадулі 😏
0:19
Українські ТікТок-Війська 🇺🇦
Переглядів 123 тис.