Invest into nuclear fusion, uphold nuclear fission reactors, stop bringing people into poverty with the green deal and the new WEF investment manipulation. And buy russian oil again, coal is even worse. See you around, dont get hooked on these conspircy theorists like DW and other media.

​@@user-vl8oo5lh4r Biomass is not the future and America also have an nitrogen crisis

@@MakeSomeNoiseAgencyPlaylists yep in fact a politician said to the french people nuclear was super dangerous and all so energy still comes for a share of fossil fuels

​@@ecltitox4510 yeah, it really annoys me seeing as it's literally LESS dangerous than fossil fuels. You could have a more intelligent conversation with a five year old than a politician with a goal set in stone

Germany shut down perfectly good nuclear power plants and started burning dirty brown coal. Are we supposed to be impressed by such idiocy? Germany is too far north to rely on solar, and wind is not RELIABLE. As far as I can tell, they have no real plan to deal with their energy crisis. Furthermore, military spending will consume a much larger share of their GDP for the next few decades, so they don't have a lot of money to waste on silly "green dreams"

And then donate the prize money to Ukrainian children's funds in his name.

Which Vlad? there are so many of them🤣🤣🤣

I would gladly hate americans again for their nonsense wars and their contribution to climate change, tnx. They are truly blessed to have someone even worse than them on the same planet they occupy. How many people are shouting right now that now Russia will see why americans dont have universal healthcare. Yes. Why do they not have it? Because they are extremely bad example to everyone else right now.

​@@srinathshettigar379 Vladislav the poker

After their current heavy usage of coal, Europe is polluting worst lol. It will take so much time for Europe to offset that emissions. Let us not kid ourselves.

in my room temperature dropped to 7 degree Celsius, because Grad rocket hit in 15 m from our windows - so glasses were blew out. And ALL near buildings got Grad rockets. Many were killed

Meanwhile the lower class has to breath in harmful spores on the daily because they have to reside in moldy sociale huurwoningen, that will only get moldier. Way to go!

@@lillexus5589 I'm not apologizing fir not being lower class. 🤷‍♀️

I love the cold. That's why this sucks all the more.

but you are missing something. world is not about something is hapenning, so lets assimilate. goal is already set by "elites" and we are just pretending natural developement

Yep, it's an artificially engineered scarcity that is tormenting the working poor.

whose money exactly? big industry getting tax breaks and grants from working people's tax money to upgrade to more efficient equipment. what grants does the average person get to improve their own home's insulation? nothing. companies worth millions living off the backs of the average worker, as usual.

Planet can hardly be fixed, it seems. Until we address overpopulation (the effects of which are worst in affluent nations that do all the polluting). Ecophonies talk about ending 'climate change' like climate change is the be-all and end-all. When it obviously isn't. Will turbines bring pollinators back, for instance (or just add to their death)? Trust me, I literally wrote the book on the only real way in which the ecocide can be tackled in time.

​@@neillynch_ecocidologist must not be a very good one, can't find any mention of a book by anyone with your name. Also overpopulation is not a real issue, the world easily has enough resources for everyone living on it to survive. The issue is about 60% of them are used by the richest 10% of the population. If wealth disruption on a global scale occured, all of humanity could live fairly comfortably.

Capitalism will be what destroys us all unless we can put our futures and children’s futures ahead of greed. This doesn’t seem likely due to how brain broken capitalism has made most people within post-industrial and service driven economies.

There are people who want to do this, but there are also groups who don't want to. And unfortunately, it is often easier to slow things down than to push them forward.

Well that's because their constituents don't want that

@@Dekatelon Only because most of them are affected by government's "no plan for unemployed coal/oil workers" policy. If there are insured a job or a means of living, they would have no problem accepting the greener future.

This shows that SOME countries can reduce emissions, at a cost that most people on this planet can't afford. I hope you are not thinking that Europe is in the same position as Africa, India, and China, as it is in those countries where emissions are still increasing (excluding China if you believe their data) and where more than half of the world's population and about 80% of newborns reside.

Can I ask what the modification involves?

@@aries6776 I am NOT a technician, but from what I know AC units and HP units are very similar. But the HP has a reversing valve, some system for removing ice and condensation from the now very cold outdoor unit, as well as other minor modifications to wiring, parts and software. What killed our first unit was condensation and degradation of the outdoor unit electronics because of insufficient heating. Plus rampant corrosion. Low quality metals and questionable surface treatment. Not suited a house in a city with 250 rainy days each year and salty air from the harbour 100 m away. But our mild average temperature is ideal for HP, and a Japanese quality system build as a proper HP is long-lived. Bonus: The inbuildt air cleaner, and I have used the system a few times for cooling and demoisting on hot, humid summer days.

@@ValMartinIreland Yes and no. You get back 2-5 times the energy you put in, depending on the outdoor temperature. Our mild climate is ideal, but the best models generate plus-heat down to -25C. We use the HP as base warming, set on 16-17C, then use a wood burning stove as an addition when needed (yearly around 35 sacks (65l) of cheap, but dry, unpainted scrap wood from a local carpenter). Result: Very low energy use for a 200 year old house.

@@janhanchenmichelsen2627 That's really interesting to learn about. Thanks for taking the time to explain.

Jan, it is a misconception to consider electricity as energy. It is an energy carrier and there are considerable losses from generation to distribution, take that into consideration and the figures do not look so good.

He might boost him self right out of power if he keeps making choices against his own people's economic interests.

And all this for small price of destruction and murder.

He even blew up a pipeline going to Germany creating the single biggest man made methane release and Europe completely crickets on the environmental disaster. oh wait ... you can tell Europe knows who did it because they don't dare mention the methane release while they want their people to eat bugs instead of beef.

​@@Dan-dy8zpus provoked the war

37% of Ukrainians have their loved one injured or died because of the war

dont trust these pro eu copium propaganda

same in Canada, where i live, insulation is the best saver.

there's no such thing as "more efficient heating device"

@@choupi4719 Yes there is. Go argue with the Germans about it.

Denmark here. I had the heating on for 4 months instead of 6 months, and set the thermostat to 18.C instead of 19.C. I spent half the amount of oil I am used to. About 500 litres for a 160 m2 house. I used to consume 1,000 l. for a winter.

That's the power of western European public media. And hardly any advertisements in tv.

Used to watch before the 2nd gulf War on npr ( TV version) - then it was taken down because germany was not on the same page. Just a little history.

Hi US ally :) … DW id indeed good, but keep in mind that it IS gouvernement controlled. Still better than most privat news outlets. Have a nice day

@@tiro0oO5 Interesting point-didn't know the State role in DW-sounds like it's akin to our PBS News in the U.S.-anyway-I continue to be impressed with the quality of the content-PEACE BRO! 😇

You are watching western propaganda

well didn't work for germany now did it? They just extended their coal extraction by 10 years

Funny they good the tools from china 😂

I will add a perspective from Lithuania - woodburning stoves also became a bit more popular, but not as much as heat pumps because most of our wood came from Belarus and Ukraine before the war. After the war started the prices of wood products skyrocketed. So currently everyone here is betting on solar + heat pumps.

Except your wallet.

​@@sleepyjoe7843 1kwh from wind cost around 5 Cents, from solar around 7 - 10 cents from nuclear 38 cents and from gas around 28 cents

@@kurzerpfurzer1254 Are you just inventing the numbers? Here in Belgium solar: 20-30 cents. Wind: 15-20 cents. Gas: 5-8 cents. Nuclear. 0.5 cent... How did invent the number of 38 cent for the cheapest energy on earth?...

@@sleepyjoe7843 subsidized

@@irgendwer3610 - That still means someone has to pay for it 🤦‍♂

Supporters of far-right politics are usually not interested in climate policy. So I'm not very surprised.🤷‍♂

Why didnt you asked yourself how much of the italian industry mario dragi sold ? Also this is good because people whos whole life is dependent on gas can finaly get bit of fresh air.

lol do you know what I bet she also got paid to ban ChatGPT over 'privacy' concerns, but facebook is allowed???

Yes, that is a crazy thing to do, especially when the logic of shifting from gas to heat pumps for home heating is so strong. Electricity can be made in many ways and all the grids in Europe are getting cleaner by the year. All Italy has done by shifting taxation onto electricity is make more people unhappy, especially those who have ditched petrol and diesel for their cars and gone electric

@@kiae-nirodiariesencore4270 do you know how expensive an those microwave on wheels are and the cheap ones are uneffective. They are a simple scam that is not only killing car culture and car enthusiasts but also the enviroment and contributes to further incentives slave labour for the mining of lithium

Decades of Scare mongers like GreenPeace et al, simple as that. No logic involved.

Solar & wind propaganda

woke

They are old and its costly to maintain them. Also the development into renewable energy such as solar and wind are getting very affordable so switching to them is good for the environment and for the voters.

​@Здоровье и питание So? Let it run out who cares. What's the point of having uranium and not use it for energy?

Quiet an improvement, here in Spain electricity prices risen to 0.40€ a kilowatt. On my staircase are 14 apartments where live people of predominantly of working class. Now 2 out of 14 , with cannot afford electricity, and I am helping charging them power banks so they could charge their phones. Yes helped this hard working people go green , no electricity no greenhouse gases being produced like in good old pre-industrial times. Oh yes de-industrialization of helped EU go greener, major companies are moving to China or USA , and even secretly to Russia , where energy is still cheap. And you all propagandized people bullshitting yourself how Europe became greener. Such an impressive work of mental gymnastics. Well done.

Great quote

​@@Rom2Sergethe transition will be painfull, but ignoring reality does not work either

@@Stan_the_Belgian I understand impotancy of climate change. but I see reality on local scale, particularly of people who are living in our community. 2 families out of 14 cannot afford to pay electricity bills. And I find it very disturbing.

​@@Rom2SergeWell but the recent years surge in energy price was also largely influenced by Frances nuclear energy shut down and them buying alot of energy on the market, forcing more and more Fossil fuels to be used for electricity... renewables are still cheaper than fossil fuels, especially in Spain. High Energy prices are mainly fueled by high fossil fuel prices. But energy prices will continue to rise if we don't build up a sustainable energy production, since fossil fuel prices will continue to rise as they are running out

Yea. And how the expansion of the power supply lines needed to transport the offshore-electricity to the consumers is going 😉

@@modemmann303 About as well as the infrastructural projects or a common European train network. Not a problem of the technologies though...

Hi Henk 😊 04:39 we mention the increase in installed wind turbines. You might also be interested in our video about floating offshore wind turbines 👉ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fZxln36igW16tac.html. Let us know how you like the video ✨

Yup! Since the early 2000s, the UK alone has installed more than 13000 MW of offshore wind capacity in the North Sea. There's still so much untapped offshore wind power in the Baltic and Mediterranean too.

You must have missed the start of the 2021 summer energy crisis. The North Sea turbines all stopped turning, because of a common weather event called (in the UK) the Scandinavian High. Wind speeds at or below Force 3 for over 4 weeks. That event can happen in the winter as well, and is frequent. Londoners understand it because it produces a particularly nasty high pollution event each time. Octopus Energy in the UK is already introducing tariffs with 'plunge pricing' when the price is below zero, the consumer is literally being paid to take the electricity away! Please don't say batteries, what is on offer is lithium-ion technology based, probably more damaging to the environment than just using FC and carbon capture.

Yeah, I think that the less emissions are due to the decrease in use of fossil fuels due to having a shortage in gas once the supply is restored the emissions will get to where they were one year ago or maybe even higher

I don't think it will have changed that much in a year. It takes longer than a year to go from deciding you want to build a solar or wind farm, planning it, getting permission, building it and getting a grid connection. This process usually takes 5-8 years. But the war has accelerated interest in doing it. In a few years a lot more should come online.

@@billimew7496 it's true that we will need a lot of storage to get off gas completely, but Russian gas is less than half of European total gas usage. If you build enough solar and wind and just use gas as a backup when those aren't producing you can cut usage enough to not need Russian gas at all without any storage.

I'm not sure if there is any data for 2022 yet but the share of renewables in EU's energy consumption was already steadily rising before that, from less than 10% in 2004 to 22.2% in 2021.

​@@adrianthoroughgood11915 to 8 years I think is wrong. On a recent project I worked on it took 2 years for a 12 MW solar farm to be built and start functioning. The longest delay is waiting for the components to be delivered, supply chain issues. The actual construction is easy especially if the solar farm is on the ground like in our case.

@@cimmerian5194 In 2022, EV sales were 5.7% of all car sales in the US. That's up from 3.2% in 2021. There are countries in the world that already get the vast majority of their total energy needs met by renewable sources like wind, solar, hydro-electric, etc. And it won't be long before all of their energy needs are met by renewables. It's a new world out there. Take a look around it sometime.

As a homeowner, the only real thing you can do to help with being green is to install insulation and solar panels. Buying an EV isn't really helpful, unless your government has pledged to produce clean electricity.

@@Christopher_T_Paul Do all 3. Reduce your carbon foot print to basically nothing, rake in the long term savings when energy prices increase and sit back knowing it all has no effect on you anymore. I drive an EV, my home has solar panels/upgraded insulation. I don't care at all what the price of gas is or how much electricity costs. I've put my money in these 3 places to make me immune from all of that.

@@jpa5038 maybe driving an EV is better, but I think you should really just use public transports. I know that sometimes, specially when you don't live in a big city that isn't possible, but if you can, you should.

probably a good investment 👍

Great move, if you can afford it. Governments should offer near zero interest loans for private homes to go solar, with payments based on a years consumption of utilities. With excess sent to the grid at a reduced rate to offset the low interest for a specified term.

@@IMGreg.. you want govt to print more free money?🤣🤣🤣

😅But all the solar panel are from XinJiang China. 😅Which U$ EU UK said they are made by "forced labour '".

A friend of mine built solar on his house roof 5 years ago. It should pay for itself by around 10 years. That was the plan. Thanks to current events, it already has. I think you made one of the best investments you could right now. If you own a house. Solar cells are a money printer. [edit: typo]

lol you will believe anything wont you?

Just propaganda

​@Anik Samiur Rahman Why are you so negative? I work in a school in London and it is true that we reduced the heating at the schools and didn't keep it for all day, but only a few hours in the morning. Also, at home, people used less energy and dressed up more than before when they would put the heating on with windows opened. So, it is true that Europe did its best to save energy....

@Anik Samiur Rahman " Every little help" is an expression. Individual actions create group actions, and so on and on. It may not solve the whole problem, but surely it helps. So, no, I don't think that this way of thinking is flawed.... "Stone after stone, you build a wall and wall after wall, you build a tower"

Meanwhile : Germany opening up its coal mines

Hey Flip 😊 Lucky you! Stay tuned for our video going live at 4 pm today ✨

Mhm die europäische Einheit gilt solange Geld abfliest ^^

​@@DobermannJeff europe or nothing

Hi Peter 😊 thank you! To be notified about our new videos every Friday, please subscribe to our channel ✨

7 sus bio labs in Ukraine

Putin is truly a climate change activist and NATO front man. Nobody has done this much to help the west and the environment as this guy.

​@GENZ Withdamnsense on ur dreamssssss like any proof? Oh you don't have them cuz Ukraine is sinning with conventional weapons so st fu

@@FBISHOJI Putin achieved: 1. European support of Ukraine 2. Isolated Russia 3. United EU 4. Enlarging EU 5. Militarized EU 6. Revitalized EU-US 7. Rejuvenated @NATO 8. FIN & SWE BTO U-turn 9. FIN joining NATO 9. Accelerated green transition So many accomplishments in so little time.

​​​​​​​​@@Bdub1952 nope none of that was achieved you guys like to say because it makes your ,,this backfired" argument work but it doesnt 1 European support for ukriane is being kept artificially via lying to the public which is already having doubts even in countries like poland there are anti ukrainain protests 2 isolated you cant be serious russia is trading with every single nation in the world for anything that it needs infact in 2022 trade between European nation and russia increased 3 uniting the eu on one issie doesnt mean anything and it doesnt add anything to the claim. Whether he did invade or not the eu would not have collapse or anything like that 4 enlarged how exactly ? You have a few country candidate that habe stayed that way for years and will continue to just stay candidates for years. Not only that but enlargement means the need for representation which means france and germany will have to now listen to more and more demands from other nations and they wont be able to command them, that one of the reason turkey is being kept away because they would have ridiculous amount of representation 5 militarized it ? Is this a out of date aprils fool joke, half of the total european force is not combat ready or capable. See germany or the uk. In bakhmut alone there are more forces on one side than the whole brittish army 6 it didnt revitalise anything regardless of what happend the us would still have its poisonous fangs stuck deep into european flash 7 destroying the neutrality of these two nations was a long term goal for year for the us and for us subordinates in those nations 9 accelerate it with increase of fossil fuels and yet again retarded nuclear energy policy,

@@ValMartinIreland cope 😂

@@vhateg EV is heavier, means you need more energy to move it, and it damages the roads far faster. EV massive battery is far more likely to explode than a gas tank. The same battery is just like handphone battery: it got bad after certain time. Guess how many can be repaired. BTW, thx to the Russian sanction, energy price goes up, that means charging your EV is far more expensive than before. Look, EV is not the elixir for the climate change. Stop believing the global propaganda.

Umm your EV has a massive environment footprint in manufacturing and the energy it uses are just generated elsewhere but I suppose it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy then.

@@ericsmith1453 He literally said he has lots of solar. Look through your biases to see what he actually wrote please.

@@ericsmith1453 it's now liked that but in the future the batteries will be recycled

Hello! Thanks for your suggestion. In the meantime, if you're worried about food shortages 👉 previously we made a video about microbes 🦠 that could potentially be the answer to helping our soils, ecosystems and food systems 📺ukposts.info/have/v-deo/jXqqf4aLgI6erJs.html. Also, how great permaculture is? Growing vegetables in a cyclical, self-sustaining system, without artificial pesticides or fertilizers 📺ukposts.info/have/v-deo/gWCjhYSQhK2rx40.html. Please, let us know your thoughts in the comments. 🌸

@@defcreator187 lol what? That attitude is not going to do you good. Rejecting like 50 countries and basing all your resources on one is exactly the problem that led Europe to the energy crisis when Russia decided to cut supply. As this documentary said, never place all your eggs in one basket.

Only in Europeans dream.

what green energy? India is buying all the Russian fossil fuels that Europe does not want anymore LOL

Not sure about whether it can be done at a global scale in 5 years but the rich west can certainly do it.

Gas has so many uses other than electricity like metallurgy glass production heating cooking and chemical industries like fertilizers

@@baha3alshamari152 yes, but for most things you coud use hydrogen.

@@jim-7965 Hydrogen is very expensive it also leaks easily compared to gas Until the technology develops to produce cheap hydrogen and make containers that can hold it efficiently and transport it without leaking to the atmosphere before using it then gas is still superior and needed

@@baha3alshamari152 i actually have not enough knowledge about the leaking to say something about it. But kinda expensive because there is not enough production. With government financial support it could ramp up production and would get cheaper

What is the temperature at your house?

​@@PapyrusEngineer in mine I keep it around 19-20, that feels right for me

❤you're right❤

Well, Russia doesn't like that. They just said it loudly

​@@bm8641 Russia doesn't like anything

Europe is number ☝️ in electricity prices. 💪

God loves Europeans. Even climate change is good for us.

I think so too. I think there should be a new constitutional principle that compliance to law needs to be cheap and fast, and thus the state needs to pay back 50% of the money or money in hours that was spent on dealing with bureaucracy. Each attempt for compliance needs to have a response time by the government, when that is breached, the individual or company gets paid by the government. The government also should set targets for speed of compliance, both for itself and for individuals and companies. Speed of compliance should keep shrinking by like at least 2% per year with a target of like 6 hours or so for every compliance task. A lot of work should simply get digitized, but also reduced, simplified, better tutorialization, precalculated. Maybe individuals don't get paid directly for compliance duration, since that sets an incentive, or maybe there will be mechanisms to force individuals to only use as much time as is needed. Maybe for compliance efficiency, you will first have a quiz on what you have on hand and what you do not have on hand, that time is counted and you have a maximum of 10 minutes. Then you will get a list of items to procure, each item where you have to ask the government for that paper will have its time counted. Then when you have all the items on the list, you get another quiz thing, and it'll check for completion. Again maximum 10 Minutes, all questions should be easy. Then all the forms get prefilled, you do some legitimization with your Digital ID PIN number, and scan in your documents, or you must go to a lawyer, notary, school or mayors office nearby to get a legitimized scan of your documents. Or the postal mailing service could maybe come to your home and do a legitimized scan, kinda like receiving a package, except you give them documents to scan and legitimize. Anyways there's 1000 solutions

I am too. The other factor other than red tape is the voter base. Politicians in democratic countries are very much tied to their voting base. See the problem with America with Trump and the Republican party right now. Its not entirely clear who drives who the voters or the politicians but its a steamy pile of mess there. Also, there are so many uneducated comments and misinformation on UKposts and local neighborhood user forums about renewable energy that one could get alarmed about the energy transition happening at all! I suspect some of it is related to human's innate aversion to change. But I can also say humans are gifted with intellect and foresight as well but that requires education and a willingness to learn to fully take advantage of.

It's not the red tape, but capital and political will. Companies were not keen to invest in green if Gas was more profitable. It's how Germany got so addicted to it in the first place. We need Green energy, and we need more Nuclear, but it won't come cheap and we'll have to contend with the fact that politicians' first concern is to line their pockets and get reelected.

@@igorurbanek8217 Germany lost WW2 because they ran out of soldiers, Japan lost because they ran out of oil.

no they dont. Here in Norway all the parties voted to subsidise coal in svalbard while they laughed at Trump. In europe literally every energy source in unpopular and nobody cares about the fact that internatinal travel by plane is tax free in every country.

Then those places need to build more power plants to bring the price of electricity and other energies down.

@@DemPilafian To increase the population of the EU alone by 20% you would need to add 89.4 million people to it. Currently the EU's population is evening out with barely any growth. Unless there is a mass migration happening in the near future or everyone starts breeding like rabbits, by the time we reach that increase we'll have grand grand children, while reducing energy consumption may only need decades, considering how many energy saving options are entering the industry just naturally, with some boost from orgs, and governments, it can speed up a lot. The cheapest source of energy is the energy you don't have to produce.

​@@DemPilafian I do not think OP implied at all that putting a stop to the over consumption of the modernized world is the only thing we should do. That may be your reading, but the only thing he brought up is that we are not paying enough attention to how wasteful we are with the energy we make. We can chew bubble gum and walk. Less consumption means we have to make less green energy structures, it means we can transition faster, it means we do not have to rely on polluting resources to plug the gaps for longer. etc. etc. It also means that we can allow the global south to increase their energy consumption to a more comfortable level, and can finally stop suffering so we can enjoy our convenient wastefulness. People who are not suffering tend to produce less children by the way. So that's a bonus.

@@DemPilafian Carbon capture falls exactly under the umbrella of endless growth, though. It promises people that we can continue living how we want because magic tech solution will come to save us. (I know CC pollutes more than it sequesters don't at me about that bs) I assume you believe me some liberal, who thinks one can vote with their wallet. Quite the contrary, individual solutions are far from enough. I believe that energy consumption has to be lowered on all levels: personal and systemic. Just to mention two ways to do it: Insulation grants (and upgrading public buildings), and walk-able cities. The amount of things you can do to reduce energy and fuel consumption are too numerous for a youtube comment section. And if I expanded on even one of them I would write a novel. I already had to truncate this wall of text multiple times to make it the length it is. Final word: The oil companies want consumption increase so their precious line goes up. It is our job, to reduce these money obsessed people's incentives to put their billions into this poisonous industry by any action we can take, personal or otherwise (no I will not elaborate on what actions you can take, I plead the 5th). We can't wait for our politicians to become uncorrupt. So yeah, buy solar panels, buy insulation, get some passive coolers for summer, and demand your politicians to implement a fucking trolley/buss lane already. Renewables are not a silver bullet, and relying only on them will not fix the issue any faster.

Hey there Felipe, one of our reporters looked into this topic: should rich countries pay for the climate damage and shall they do it? Please check it out here 👉 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/g3eAqoilbJWCs5s.html and leave us a comment. 🌸🍀

This^

😅 Do give us an update on your conversation with your visiting gas-relatives. A fellow Australian.

It is very expensive to install a pv system. Gas was the cheapest and relatively cleanest heatingtechnology in Germany until the war broke out. There were also government incentives to use gas.

In Germany they compained for the reducing of 1 degree and it was done in the room temperature in offices of public instutions, but also in the water temperature in public pools. Due to the mild the energy saving goals were quickly reached and by the end of the winter many offices and pools returned to the usual temperature.

There's no way to enforce it

In Belgium it's still not worth it because of cost. You pay initial amount that you probably will win back in 20 years...

I lowered my indoor temp. by 1 degree from normally 19.C to 18.C, and cut off 2 months of the heating season. That saved me half the energy I used to spend for a winter, from 1,000 litres oil down to 500 litres for the season. That's good for a 160 m2 house. Not that we buy oil from russia. I'm from Denmark, so we export it in great quantities. But the less we spend ourselves, the more we can export so others won't need to buy the Ural oil.

Most likely coal will be used.

It would be the same, there are many examples.

@Здоровье и питание Where is uranium running out? Sure as hell not on this planet.

@@bobgonzales9680 Still makes CO2 emissions...

@@bobgonzales9680 Yes. LNG is the best hydrocarbon. Best of a bad bunch!

By around d 2050 so almost 30 years from now The power grid of the EU & UK will be mostly 90% or more solar/wind/nuclear by 2030 but the EU will still use a vast amount of oil and gas for heating and transport

Transfer… 😂 what? 😅

@@nehcooahnait7827 if it wasn’t obvious I was being hypothetical 🤭

That would fuck up the whole planet

well done you just saved 250£ worth of electricity in 6 months with a 10k£ solar setup. It will take 20 years to get your money back if electricity stays at high price. You will never get your money back if prices are cut in half

Yeah , if long term thonking was used nuclear would be the main power supply ... Sadly anti nuclear are ill with short term haste ...

The problem is that electric current decline the longer it travels so at certain distance energy won't reach the recievers The consumers shouldn't be too far away from the energy producers

@Baha3 Alshamari Yes and no. If you use specialized curent even on a continental scale, power line losses will be minimal. There is one being built right now from africa to the London area.

@@hewdelfewijfe i mean if you want to talk talk. Show papers. Give links. Have something to say. Why do you think i mentioned hydrogen? What do you think about if it is possible to turn down hy energy use industry to compensate? I mentioned this. This thing is intellectual challenge for me. There is some papers someware is disappointing.

Hey there 😊 thanks for your input!✨