Lol even so I don't think Elon would had been happy with what he found once he unwrapped that ICBM.

Yup, Musk is the major reason for destruction of Russia's space program. With Oil revenue drying up & very few commercial customers, Russia would be hard pressed to develop next gen architectures

Ironically, purchasing that ICBM probably would have set spacex back.

@@sebione3576 Purchasing that ICBM would have meant no SpaceX to begin with.

Arunava Ghatak Trump for Prison 2021 🐉

You do reálie, that Musk is a good marketer. Better applaud the hundreds of overworked engineers.

@@Spectification yeah ...Boeing also have workers but they are not the one succeeding ... Leadership does play a major role. It did throughout history in the battlefields, sports, politics, business ... And it still does to this day.

@@Spectification Elon himself is a design engineer too. In fact he is one of the few CEOs who have been directly involved in engineering the product of the company (and not just managing others).

SpaceX got less money because they already had the dragon capsule which was already funded by nasa funding. Boeing had to start from scratch.

@@MrPbhuh Boeing was getting funded for years wdym......Not just for their capsule but all the failed projects........If that's Boeing's "start from scratch " to compete with such a company like SpaceX. That's sad because the dragon capsule has twice as much space with way less funding, and actually made it to the ISS...

CEILING GANG yeah I agree.

I agree with that!!

The point is to encourage competiton so then relying on only one is exactly against the goal

​@@catgirl3581 yes agree, but it looks like boeing does not given result as a competitor either ( no spacecraft on time , double cost)

@@Cars-N-Jets Nooooo!!! FLOOR GANG AAUUH!!

Also USA = President is Businessman = USA Ruined

@@chaisowunn6038 RENT FREE

Elon isnt an engineer

Being a engineer is a board certified thing you must take tests for (FE and the PE) you can look up engineers on google and find them. My uncle my brother and me are all board certified electrical engineers you can look us up. Elon musk is not an engineer. He has a physics degree and is very smart

@@Coolgiy67 Lol. Have you been to engineering school? My classes so far have been math and physics only. A physicist will actually know more details intricately than an Engineer would. Engineering and Physics go hand and in hand. They aren't entirely different because we use the principles that Physics has set in stone and build upon them. Anyone who has been through engineering school would be confident in a Physicist's ability to transfer into engineering. If you think that a certification is what makes a good engineer then I think I'd have to take you back thousands of years when there were amazing engineers but no degrees or certifications lol.

Arunava Ghatak please shut up, this video has literally nothing to do with Trump.

Yeah... not sure where trump came into this but... sure...

@@spotlizard0374 he is just spamming on all comments with the stupid song. Just report this as a spamming.

@@spotlizard0374 There is no rule that prohibits us from making comments on UKposts that has nothing to do with the video.

@Anish Mulchandani Thanks, I will.

SpaceX designs of that type would make Werhner Von Braun squirm in his grave. I would call it 21st Century designs.

What r U tokin about ?:))

1950's science fiction was trying to foresee what space travel would actually look like. Landing a rocket on its tail is by far the easiest way to do it, because there are support points and an engine conveniently already installed there. It was obvious even back then.

You mean this ? ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fHp_nY9spame130.html

@@josephastier7421 No, no that's not true at all. Vertical landing of a vehicle with a high fineness ratio (tall and thin as opposed to short and squat) requires control systems almost undreamed of until about ten years ago. There is nothing easy about it.

well said hahaha

Losing money now in Covid area as far as contracts and lack of plane orders

Boeing just want fight for the future of space flights, they have planes....so.... it doesn`t matters spent money, just earn it, SpaceX is the little boy of Elon, he had a dream and it going to make happen, is not money, it´s ambition for him.

You hit the nail on the head there.. Dreams are the only place anyone ever goes to FAKE SPACE!

Boeing is busy making money?? By my back of the envelope calculation, they made a loss of $2.8 Billion over the lst 12 months and with most of the world's airlines putting a freeze on aircraft purchases, it is only going to get worse.

Genius

I'd think long and hard before betting against this guy. In some ways he reminds me of a young Howard Hughes. Both were genius level minds and ran into heavy resistance to their ideas. Both also leaned into that resistance and continued to push forward. The results, while not always quick to bear fruit, have been very impressive.

How the times have changed though. SpaceX/Tesla has even overtaken Google as the top choice of young talents.

@@kunalsingh4418 really??

@@kunalsingh4418 yeah, Elon said this during their development of the first SpaceX rocket, the Falcon 1

That's 36 Billion of 1960's money, more like 500 billion today's money. Boeing is a criminal organization.

Lol good one

@@15past2 It's not just Boeing that's at fault. The reason these hugely overpriced contracts keep being given out is the military industrial complex's control of congress. Boeing, Northrup Grumman, Lockheed ect lobby the representatives for the areas where they employ people, the representatives lobby congress and then congress gives out huge overvalued contracts in the name of 'job protection'. Of course this is not limited to the aerospace industry but effects pretty much every aspect of the US economy.

@@ddandymann Yes agree, It is a web that stretches to all aspects of society including the right to manufacture money as they please. I am afraid we are at the end of our rope.

Yeah trying to set their clocks to the right time.

VW CEO just praised the heck out of Tesla ^_^ on all fronts.

Tesla now has a bigger market cap than all 3 of them combined.

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

@@ironmantis25 Not a particularly meaningful metric to compare the companies.

and it's a shame really, since once upon a time, THEY were the innovators. The 747, and the ford GT were both hugely innovative for their time, and now, they're much more commercial.

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

Boeing is used to big bloated massively lucrative defense budget contracts. They have no idea how to produce at a high level for a reasonable budget.

@@arunavaghatak8614 you really gotta be spamming the song on every video right?

@@blablaelgore I didn't bother to click. I just reported it. You should try the same to get his account suspended. Since I didn't bother checking it, what was the video about? Pro-Trump propaganda? or the opposite?

triadwarfare Pro-Trump propaganda

and some russian general spit at his shoes.

They say ( i don't who exactly! 😅😅) "Success is the best revenge"

@@arunavaghatak8614 this isn't about trump moron

@@arunavaghatak8614 the video you linked proves this entire country is a meme and we're living in it 👽

@@smaronboruah1921 Why? He did a lot for the country before the pandemic. And now people are blaming Trump for the coronavirus deaths, while clearly it is the fault of the people for taking the lockdown lightly. So many Americans don't even want to wear a mask.

In 2 years time we should see SpaceX launch the lunar lander for NASA.

Yes and no. Its is true that this is getting embarresing for Boeing, but when it comes to the price difference, dont forget that NASA also paid SpaceX to develop the (non crew) Dragon capsule and the F9 rocket outside of the Crew dragon pricetag.. So they did kind of have a head start that was also paid by NASA.

Yeah, he said in an interview that he spends 80% of his time on engineering and design.

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

@@arunavaghatak8614 bot?

@@protocnic3772 No. I am not a bot.

@@protocnic3772 just report for spam

With MARS grown potatoes for dinner ;)

the way spaceX operates they will still be Nasa astronauts.

What will they then do on mars? I'll tell you what they will want is to go home straight away.

Elon will have a Cybertruck converted into a limo, with champagne and hors d'oeuvres waiting for them, and then autopilot drive them to the airbnb cabin for dinner.

Nasa employee:wait you beat us at the race Space x engineer:always have been

AHHHHHH.....the good old days with werner von braun

@Neel Javia you should not underestimate the supreme leaders powers

@Neel Javia What is that supposed to mean?

@@josephastier7421 come back when you're older

@@theboontz58321 I didn't ask you.

@徐哈哈 Try harder.

EXACTLY...

Spacex isnt a mamas boy

Exactly. The biggest issue here isn't SpaceX vs Boeing. It's Fixed Price vs Cost Plus contracting. 10:36 Even Boeing can do an okay job for the taxpayer when the Cost Plus cookie jar is taken off the table. (Keep this up for a decade or so and they might even catch up with SpaceX.) Human behaviour is mostly driven by incentives, so you *have* to get your structures right.

@Tony Wilson KEEP SHARING STORIES. I want to hear more from you.

Tony Wilson I’m Aussie as well. My 12 year old niece is doing very well at school and is VERY keen on being involved somewhere in the space industry. Whether it is research or more likely tourism. We were thinking aerospace engineering would be a good path. Do you have any opinion on aerospace engineering as a career path in general and any insights in general if space is the path she wants to pursue?

@@user-gl9mf3zo7r There will always be billionaires. At least Elon is trying to advance mankind. All the other billionaires are just your typical billionaires.

He is now the 3rd Richest man in the world,just surpassing mark zuckerberg

@@mosalah8551 Ya, and we're going back to the moon and Mars because of it.

@@user-gl9mf3zo7r some billionaires have signed the giving pledge so they aren’t all bad

@@user-gl9mf3zo7r Why is it inhumane? Because he could cure world hunger with it, or eliminate poverty? How? If it was that easy, everybody would do it, and we wouldn't have world hunger anymore. Buying a bunch of food or consumable resources for everyone might be a temporary fix, but is unsustainable. It's worse - it makes the receiver think that they can get free food for doing *nothing*, and they begin depending on something that's unsustainable. Oh then, maybe give it to a charity? Are charities really the most efficient at converting capital into solving the world's problems? If so - which ones, and would it permanently solve the problem at hand? (and why aren't more engineers/smart people going to charities if it's so important) Maybe a more efficient and sustainable means of capital allocation is placing it towards an infrastructure that doesn't pollute the climate (i.e. mass-manufacturing electric vehicles), or makes sure humanity prevails during a catastrophic event on Earth (i.e. living on Mars) Also - if you think spending money is so easy as a billionaire, why doesn't Elon just take its $120B net worth and make 24 gigafactories simultaneously? The moment Elon starts cashing out, the value of Tesla will tank as others jump ship. Please provide a solution that you think Elon should take which is more humane, I'm really curious

Rocky Ugsod that makes sense

Boeing and Lockheed

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

:D

Well it did but the capsule got confused and didn’t know what time it was

Ryan Novakovic well I guess the capsule should keep both time and air sealed inside.

Ryan Novakovic Starline is confused, it hit itself in confusion

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

Elon also wants money

@@nousername8162 he would rather have advancements

@@nousername8162 he wants money for SpaceX, he doesn't care about personal wealth. These contracts get SpaceX closer to Mars.

GaLoS if you genuinely think Elon musk doesn’t want money for personal gain you are delusional.

At least the oranges are worth something

Sylas, or apples and rotten apples

@@thetinker167 everything is worth *something*

Elon vs Jeff ? Yeah Oranges ….

Well, he's more of a founder at this point. If you want to see the people working behind the scenes, look up Gwynne Shotwell. She's the one who manages almost everything SpaceX.

@@zualapips1638 thats not true

This. An engineer leading the way instead of engineers trying to convince bean counters which way to go wins everytime.

Exactly! Back in the 60s when Boeing revolutionized the airline industry with the 707, 727, 747, etc, they were led by ENGINEERS! Now they hire people like Dennis Muilenburg; and look where that got them...

​​ @Hammer of Davey Well, he did have the bases well covered by Physics degree. That is like half of any engineering course. And he also learns from all the people he hired, not just books alone. Still impressive, of course.

I constantly draw parallels between Boeing and Intel. Just look at NVIDIA and AMD's CEOs vs Intel and where each company is being taken.

Not always true, SAAB was lead by engineers and was put out of business because they over engineered their cars and spent way too much on r&d. Ya they are great engineering wise but nkt profitable. Im sure bean counters (CFO’s, controllers and VP’s of finance are in musks ears

To be fair, Elon Musk almost crashed a few times. He almost didn't make payment in Tesla, but Christmas sales were so robust, that Tesla got the financial foundation needed to never be in want again. Elon Musk plays the game of high risk, high rewards. Elon Musk is incredibly successful due in no small amount to luck when luck was needed the most.

@@lambertlum1087 ok but he still did it

You can’t call numerous occasions of repeated success in low odds situations pure luck. Not in in the slightest. He’s had a continual cascade of obstacles, yet has proved again and again that he could do what he sets out for.

@@josephgomez2249 He's passionate, driven, clever, scrappy, and forward-thinking.

State of Opportunity and a narcissistic personality of which the depths we’ve not explored, he’s still young there’s plenty of time to fall off the wagon...until, then look spaceships!

that's optimistic but possible.

The race was actually between Falcon Heavy and SLS, though. Back in the days, the possibility that the MCT (the original concept for Starship) is going to be developed in the same time frame as SLS only existed in one's wildest dream.

@@maxiumlin6705 Falcon Heavy and SLS are not comparable

@@TheBest14184 Yes, but it's close. Lack of super heavy lift capability in the commercial sector was once the main excuse Congress made to justify dumping a huge chunk of NASA's budget towards Shuttle derived heavy launcher (We all know it's just pork in their eyes). Now that there's an increasing among of missions directed away because of cost, delays, and availability, it's getting clear that SLS isn't even a good super heavy launcher.

It will. The only problems they are facing is landing while NASA does Hotfires on their 6 engine rocket.

This is not surprising. At the time, Boeing was the dominating player in the industry with all the history with NASA. SpaceX only had limited success to show for. Things will be different from now on though.

SpaceX has Cargo Dragon to piggy back off of, Boeing had nothing to start off with from space.

And some of the design is suppose to "reuse existing technology so cut even more cost". Ares I/V and SLS is perfect example, When proposed, they are literally Shuttle tech lined up differently.

Sam H Boeing also got twice more money because SpaceX didn’t know they could bid that high to. I forgot where they said that I’ll try to find the article source.

@@dummyjoe7895 Their Starliner capsule shape is an upscaled Apollo command module; they didn't have to do any aerodynamic modeling for a much higher price awarded

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

@@arunavaghatak8614 absolutely nothing to do with SpaceX and commercial astronaut flights but ok...?

@@SargentH12121 Son just report him for spam

@@arunavaghatak8614 Trump for jail 2021

Actually Elon Musk want to start Universal Century with Tesla and SpaceX Colony in mars.

...This is CNBC

Tesla charges $300 to activate heated seats that's locked in software. STFU. Teslas are notoriously unreliable and poorly manufactured. They literally put them together in parking lots surrounded by tents due to a lack of trained labor force, because Musk refuses to offer decent working conditions for factory workers or allow them to unionize.

@@NUCLEARARMAMENT That's the rear seats, not the front and if you get the premium package it's all included + more. Tech isn't unreliable, the fit and finish is (for now). Tents were only a temporary measure during the M3 production issues in 2019. Lack of trained labor force, decent working conditions? Wrong, they only accept those with talent, their factory isn't worse than other places. People can unionize but Tesla don't like it. Because they are focused to 100% on transitioning humanity to sustainability. If people don't like it just find another job, simple as that.

@@DecepticonLeader The only people who can afford Teslas are rich and upper-middle-class people with decent credit ratings. It's always been a government-subsidized company, it's been that way since day one, which wouldn't be such a bad thing, if the cars they sold were as reliable as Toyotas. When a $40,000 Lexus from 1990 is more reliable and still capable of driving down the road with no major repairs than your 2020 Tesla Model S/X for $100k, even though it's fully electric, you have a serious problem. How long do you think Teslas will last?

@@NUCLEARARMAMENT They already paid back that money + interest. Can GM and Ford say the same for the money they got from the government? Lol Electric cars have less parts and thus less need for service. You fail to explain what you mean with reliable. The most common problems Tesla have is how they are a bit too technical and customers ask for help with their features even though they are found in the manual. Tesla have sent the legacy automakers into a scare where they are now scrambling to get batteries and make compelling competition at affordable price. How long it will last? Let's ask that about the other automakers. Tesla have over a decade of experience with electric cars. The others are stuck with their unreliable compliance cars and hybrids which will cost a fortune to service. They've barely started. Some will go bankrupt.

It's about damn time

I think this was more an attack on Boeing, and SpaceX just happened to be the foil lol

Jeff bezos owns blue origin not Boeing

why do people hate on Blue Origin so much? It's has such an amazing and important goal, alongside SpaceX (tho boeing is just trash)

@@BirdTurdMemes Because their whole goal to get to space is driven by corporate greed and money.

@@lakersin5260 nah not really, you do know their goals right?

@@BirdTurdMemes because, bezos is copy cat

I believe that Spacex almost went bankrupt. The Fourth test, and FIRST landing of their test rocket (Falcon 1) was the make or break of the company.

@@ChannelReuploads9451 Na it was because the falcon 1 kept failing and they relied on the fourth launch to work

well said hahahah

How can you say that? The people who work on spacecraft at Boeing are a completely separate team from those who work on commercial aircraft.

Milosz Ostrow lead by the same management.

@@Milosz_Ostrow 1, is a joke 2, they are the same company

@@ryyichy @epicollision - I know you're joking, but neither of you seem to understand how divisions work in large corporations, especially when such divisions may have been acquired businesses with their own cultures.

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

Starlink. And SpaceX have already launched military satellites on both F9 and FH. Follow the US military and you'll know who's doing the best tech.

@@ChristianHedman I'm talking more about aircrafts, missiles and so on. They aren't hurting

can't wait to see a spacex ICBM capable of delivering 10 nukes into russia and safely landing on a barge.

Zywl war is so unnecessary

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

They just can't get views, gotta change tactics.

@@aaronstone6183 An average youtuber Joe has already replaced them with better content.

@@arunavaghatak8614 shut up trump supporter. This is rockets not propaganda

@@aloiye5470 forget replying to the spam, just report the user and report the posts

He could start a company about anything today and in 5-10 years it would be 1st on innovation and results!

don't think he wants to do it for the win. he just wants to create and create and create other than retire with his billions.

Well that's what he doesn't expect, in underdog challenging his empire

Tesla's 5+ years ahead on EV and battery technology. Every electric vehicle produced by other auto manufacturers is demonstrably inferior to Tesla's lineup in range, quality, price, or any combination of those factors. Many brand new competing electric vehicles aren't even as good as the 2012 Model S. SpaceX has the launch market by the throat. Falcon 9 (and Heavy) is the only reusable orbital booster in service. Nobody else has even attempted a propulsive landing, much less a reuse, while there are F9 cores with 5+ trips to space. When Starship starts flying, it will be the first and only fully reusable heavy lift launcher. Every other option will be technically and financially obsolete. Space X is also the world's largest satellite operator by number of spacecraft. Elon's not some super greedy anti competitive robber baron. He wants widespread adoption of the technologies his companies are developing. So why is nobody competing with him? Car companies are mostly making token gestures toward EVs, while still focusing on ICE development. Every other launch provider in the world is still pushing ahead with a next generation of expendable launchers (not counting Blue Origin, but they haven't sent a single kg to orbit on one of their own vehicles.) Even China hasn't managed to copy Tesla/SpaceX to any significant degree. The lack of serious competition is mind boggling, especially considering what we've seen in tech industries in the last 20 years. These companies are ending up in pseudo monopolistic positions because of pure technological advantage through constant innovation. That should not be sustainable, but somehow they're doing it. The world needs to catch up and compete. It will be good for Elon, and better for everyone.

@Stuffzz "many failures",other than solar roof which has been slow to take off,i can't think of a failure,i hope you're not counting a couple of rockets failing because that is normal,NASA has lost not only rockets but a lot of people killed as well

@K B no someday you will have to use mph I don't know why the rest of the world uses km / h

@@mclilzenthepoet2331 because the rest of the world isn't stuck in the 19th century

Peter Metric or uscu is irrelevant. Silliest argument I've ever seen. If you want to know why SpaceX is more successful have the patience to watch this video.

@@huskydogable you take that pretty serious right? Of course that's not the reason why they are more successful. By the way the first comment wasn't mine. But it's just that handshaking feeling that a country that wants to be modern still uses a system like this in general.

@@huskydogable you must be amazing at parties, or are you the kind of person that isn't invited?

Alexander Kenway yes

Alexander Kenway - And NASA just admitted they favored Boeing & ignored shortcomings on the part of Boeing because they were used to dealing with Boeing... 😱🤦🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

SpaceX had Cargo dragon to piggy off of to help with crew dragon, Boeing has nothing they are starting from scratch with this.

DummyJoe - Boeing was given more money to develop Starliner than SpaceX was given to develop both Cargo Dragon & Crew Dragon, had the plans from both the Apollo Command Module & the Orion MPCV, & had nearly a century of experience building aircraft. And, you’re telling me that wasn’t enough to beat an upstart like SpaceX?!? Maybe we should’ve included Sierra Nevada & the Dream Chaser so Boeing could have been beaten by someone else!! 😱😂🤦🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️ Maybe Boeing & NASA should FIX the problems that probably would’ve killed the crew if one had been aboard instead of thinking up excuses as to why that spacecraft couldn’t even get itself into orbit without the aid of a Seeing Eye Dog! 🤦🏼‍♂️🤣🤷🏼‍♂️

Yu

Only if the legacy companies change up their businesses and if the electorate forces Congress to not fund space the old way.

I really don't get Richard Branson. The guy is a business mogul, not a space engineer.

Blue Origin has a really good engine that they're selling to ULA. That alone is probably more profitable than the suborbital joyrides. Then they have a massive orbital rocket in development. Meanwhile Virgin Orbit is a tiny thing.

Timothy Fargo 737 MAX accidents lead to them losing there way.

It's probably what they put a bid in for. If NASA's goal was to fund two companies so there isn't a single supplier, they have to also fund the second cheapest bid with the second highest chance of success.

The article says that SpaceX did not understand the tender process and opted to tender the 2.something billion that they did against boeings 4.something Billion, ans SpaceX still got to the ISS before them.

Probably because Musk isn’t greedy, He started SpaceX for the advancement of human space travel. Human travel being interplanetary. Boeing obviously higher their bid because their the familiar service provider plus their company is obviously being ran by greedy old men who doesn’t know the first thing about making a rocket.

Because they are able to lobby congress, it's simple really.

The answer is SpaceX had the cargo Dragon already to base the Crew Dragon off of. They said Boeing would have to start from scratch. Take from that what you will but it was the reason.

Depends on the people inside them and leading them. Private companies can be profoundly good as well as profoundly evil. Just like governments.

State of Opportunity You are right. However there is one key difference, a bad government has no reason to change. A bad government will simply stay there, while a bad company will not last very long. Sure some last an additional few years but looking at history, no company that focuses on anything other than the consumer lasts that long. One thing that has happened recently with tech companies is they started out amazing, consumer focused and experienced tremendous growth because of it. However once they achieve the majority of the market share they stagnate and go bad. This doesn’t mean they immediately collapse, they can coast for a good while on their market share and previous success.

Mark ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aoFjao6AgqqouYU.html

Boeing is a private company.

I’d be surprised if it even flys by 2022

@@Vincent20309 They will have to retire it eventually. Maybe give it a fly first.

It hasn't even flown and it's already hilariously out of date.

Well predicted about SLS and 2022

Billions*

Bryan MMZ true

lol funny. billions

And continue to lose billions more

And they keep bleeding money...

Well said, it wasn’t an accident. People were guilty.

It was the engine that exploded

NASA is corporation of Elon Musk family, brother and sister because NASA is owned by thier parents and Space x owner is Elon Musk that's why Elon Musk he occupy to contract the Nasa to manage in his space X company to sending materials into the international space station of NASA and the other rockets companys in America is alliance to upgrade the international space station and it's came from Musk family a rocket companys in America and to the other nations rocket companys and specially in Russia to support to upgrade the international space station because it's came from Musk family a rocket companys to the nations it's came from car manufacturer company's a rocket companys to the other nations, and that international space station is game watcher of inter contental ballistic missiles wars🤣🤣🤣 about game of Elon Musk in his space X company 🤣🤣 about the dragon ball anime wars of inter contental ballistic missiles wars🤣🤣 before a American government they support to Elon Musk in his game of dragon ball anime, before the American government they agree to create Elon Musk with the President of America to support in his game to upgrade the international space station because it's game watcher of ICBM wars that big camera in Space station 🤣🤣 but a American government they left it support to Elon Musk because they realize it's bad wars🤣🤣 there's many songs about it against of that wars and specially a Humanity song of scorpions 🤣🤣 that's why a American government they left it to support to Elon Musk 🤣🤣 but now a American government they support again to Elon Musk to create wealth in his space X company about a wars of inter contental ballistic wars because of the one person, but I don't want to happen that wars because all I want is to create wealth to stablish buildings near in the sea🤣🤣...

Trump 2020 m.ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fnGnenyQrGeDqIE.html

Arunava Ghatak no

Let’s all hope Blue Origin gives them some with New Glenn

Maybe it's like the IE stuff. Here's a pun: Hopefully their motivation will BOE high, and SpaceX will fly further.

That's why Ariane in Europe is now a massive fail lol Europeans are not even close to what space x or even Amazon shuttles are doing yet they've been in the industry for centuries.

Haha go to Germany you need a "Bulding permission" to put up a tent in your garden!

Are the train's on time and you still can get Yeagermister at ever station and poor quality cigarettes + a hot dog?

@@chrisduhaime5689 Maybe once in a million years a Train is on time, IDK about the Jägermeister, don' t like it, don' t ask me about cigarette quality I have (and will) never try. xD

Cigarettes are bad habits cough syrup was good in the cold. But that was a while back early 80s NewUlm 1/81 FA 56th brigade C Battery. Fun times

NASA is corporation of Elon Musk family brother and sister because NASA is owned by thier parents and Space x owner is Elon Musk thats why he occupy the contact that NASA to manage in his space X company to sending material's to the international space station and the other rockets companys in America it's alliance to upgrade the space station because it's came from Musk family and also to the other nation rocket companys in Russia and the other nations it's came from Musk family to support to upgrade the international space station...it's came from car manufacturer company's of musk family that rocket companys...and the American government they support it Nasa company they agree to Elon Musk to create wealth to the President of America to support the Nasa and space of Elon Musk, international space station is game watcher of inter contental ballistic missiles wars🤣🤣🤣 about game of Elon Musk of the dragon ball anime 🤣🤣🤣 and before a Americans government they support it that international space station but the Americans government they left it to support it because they realize that's bad wars🤣🤣 there's many songs about it wars and specially a Humanity songs of scorpions band, that's why a American government they left to support to Elon Musk bin his game🤣🤣 but now a American government support again to Elon Musk in his space X company because of the one person about a wars of inter contental ballistic missiles 🤣🤣🤣 but I want to Elon Musk to left it because all I want to create wealth for stablish building near in the sea🤣🤣🤣

Ha! So true.

If You Want Peace Prepare For War definitely

Please give an example of such embezzlement?

Odysseus Rex the space shuttle program

@Kumari Sah Giarisha None of which has anything to do with embezzlement. Do you know what that word means?

@@joejoey7272 Hmm, I worked on the Space Shuttle program. When was there embezzlement?

@@odysseusrex5908 No you didn't you low effort shill

Yes much of what was in Cargo Dragon went into Crew Dragon but Boeing did have the X-37B to draw upon but didn't due to ITAR restrictions.

i thought the SEC had forced him to step away from direct management of the company because he had had the temerity to make a public statement about future stock prices or something. That is why he is working to take the company private again. Am I wrong?

Odysseus Rex he is still the CEO so my statement has validity. So does yours.

@@odysseusrex5908 That actually made Elon richer than he would have been. He had to buy back some stock and of course it went way up.

There used to be a saying (Probably started by Boeing), "If it aint a Boeing, i aint going".. But now with the Max aircraft, it has turned in to "Ïf its a Boeing, I aint going"

And the 777Max, 787.... (the 777 Max prototype blew in half on the ground during a cabin pressurisation test).

“Done for” Is not a Financial term they use to illuminate Competitors in this industry. Any competition is good competition in business. Also it’s Lockheed.

Until he turns into the ultimate Billionaire Villain and we are all done for

Haha dont say that too loud.....you know he will....