We in the UK must have got the Aliexpress version

The 1940's usa belt was not fastened properly

On UK belt package: DO NOT FART WHILE WEARING!

In soviet Russia , belt breaks you

I like how the modern America belt is likely strong enough for conceivable uses but then breaks away without breaking the buckle. It seems like a pretty good design even though the buckle is plastic. The old Russian and America ones were pretty good because bending the clip restored them to full operation.

The 1940's American buckle was NOT properly closed up.

Пояс Советской Армии ещё использовался как оружие рукопашного боя.

The newer USA LBE belt quick release buckle is designed to release without breaking between 1.78 and 2 kilonewtons (10g shock at 40-45#) to reduce injuries and entanglement. Parachute buckles and adjusters are not designed to release or slip under load. When I was a paratrooper, we did not jump with the belt buckled, but would unbuckle the belt, loosen the shoulder straps, fold the ends in and pull the two sides through the diagonal back-straps of the parachute harness. When we rappelled, we used a harness or Swiss Seat but kept the belt buckled.

Russia 841 kg! Great Brittain 38 kg 🤣

Amazingly made by Stalinium! With a simple design, the holder is small but able to withstand very heavy loads. With just a little damage, even old designs can still be repaired

The 1940 US belt is actually a UK 1944 pattern belt, initially issued for jungle warfare, then onward after the war until 1958 until the pattern changed, great channel, captivating, great UKposts thanks

За тему из Холмса отдельное спасибо! Смешно. Думаю, англичане не поймут.

Good to see the UK upholding tradition. 👍

To the British soldiers watching this, you should be proud to defend your country!

the belt of the 40th year was connected incorrectly, let's do it again

That new Russian belt could be easily used as improvised rigger belt. I use belt that was meant to hold fully grown bull in place. I think it has around 3 tonnes breaking point. Not useful as trousers belt, but darn awesome for gear carry.

You didn't have the 1940 USA buckled correctly.

It’s a belt buckle u wear for equipment. If it gets caught on something do I want my body to separate into 2 pieces or the buckle?

Where do you get that chinese one?

US 40 belt is actually a UK pat 58

Dammit Great Britain ! You are my brother and I expect more from you !

Horses for courses - there are times you don't want a belt to break (when you need it to work as a belt in most circumstances) and there are times you want the belt to break (entanglement) rather than let the belt break you. A compromise has to be reached, and each country has their own tolerance to risk, different risk appetite and mindset for dealing with people. I personally want a belt to be a belt and not to kill people, not to be the strongest item on the planet and lift huge weights that are reserved for cranes and chains, but other perople may want that capability, just in case they need it. When you are in a jam, you don't want your belt to hold you back, get caught on something that ensnares you and cut you in half. It is a belt, if it breaks you get another one or improvise with something until you get a new one. If a belt breaks, you can still carry on. The great thing about the British Forces is the ability to constantly improvise when things go wrong (and they always do go wrong in war). There is no such thing as fail-safe, 100% guaranteed or full reliability on everything. There are only three things the British Forces rely upon, themselves, their buddies and their ability to complete their mission, everything else is really inconsequential. It is a mindset issue - don't delude people thinking they have 'super human' equipment, they invariably have to rely on themselves and their initiative a lot of the time. Not everything is fastened properly in life - just accept it and move on. Russia may have the strongest belts in the world, but when it comes to warfare, we are seeing in real-time how quickly they buckle. When you are measuring belts instead of bravery, you are measuring the wrong thing.

The american 1940's belt you closed the wrong way. Look at your own vid (5:25) how to close it properly. I think it will test even much better

I used an East German web belt to pull a side by side out of deep sand . Thank you Erik Hoeneker and friends .

The so called " USA 1940 " belt is actually a 1944 Pattern British Army belt and not latched properly. This 44 Pattern webbing was issued to British Army late 1944-45 to troops in the CBI theatre, included revised aluminium water bottle similar to USGI and also a holster for the Browning HP 9mm pistol which saw eervice among the Paras in 1945 .

38 KG😅

Помню как иголкой стирали зеленую краску с бляхи, и полировали пастогоем до блеска. Особенно когда делать нехрен😂

Great channel

Nice 👍

What is this song call in Astria part ?

Old russian and american belts - very sturdy and if it breaks, just use some basic tools to fix it and make it like new. New russian belt - can be used to tow trucks stuck in the mud. British belt - will break if the soldier tries to hang more than 2 teabags on it.

There is an earlier version of the UK belt that has a very similar brass buckle to the 1940's US belt that you need to try.

I used a 58 pattern webbing belt that I required from my dad's reserve kit. Did me for my 8yr service from 1998 to 2006 and a roll pin belt on my PLCE webbing.

The Austrian belt is a stylish copy of the Canadian 1964 Pattern and 1990s Garrison Dress buckle. I suspect the Canadian Velcro would have slid as fast as back bacon in a hot frying pan.

The UK use a belt similar to the USA old one without holes in it

5:25 The “1940 USA” belt isn’t from the United States or is it from 1940, It’s a P58 British belt, you can tell from the buckle and the 2 buckles at the back.

I wonder how an automotive seat belt buckle would have compared?

The belt is a part of uniform which have to perform it's functions. What is a weight of Russian ammunition suspended on a belt?

軍用の耐久性テストは大事です!特に開閉動作点検、外観点検等確認ですね😉

The US 1940 belt is actually a Netherlands Army M 52 belt, that was closed improperly. The UK 1944 and 1958 pattern belts are distinctly different.

143 kg, é o peso de 2 chineses armados

“WW2” Fortunate son playing in the background

Your so called US belt @5.30 is actually a Dutch M53 pattern belt used from 1953 untill 1993, that one is probably from the '70's as it still has Brass fittings. Later ones would have anodised Ally.

isnt the 1940 usa belt mounted wrong?

You should test French Belt Famas first génération 😉

In the UK we use a belt similar to the 1940 american belt. Some people use plastic buckled ones but the majority wear something similar to the 1940 american belt

a’Belt time we learned

therefor you normally carry a spare buckle an clips with you (learned the hard way in the middle of nowhere) in Austria 😁

That ratnik belt be holding good...

По нашим стандартам замок защёлка на страховочных поясах не должен открываться при минимальной нагрузке 200 кг -это тот что защелкивается, тот что с с двумя шпильками как на офицерском замке минимально 700кг,а сама лента -пояс рвется при нагрузке не менее 1тонны и то в месте соединения в основном рвутся нитки которыми прострочена лента одна половинка к другой где петля для замка.

The 1940’s usa belt is actually a dutch belt used by the army from i think the late forties to about 1990. It looks a lot like the US belt because it was based on the same design. And you used it wrong, i am amazed at how much it still holds

Much stronger than I thought.

This is interesting. I understand why the buckle would need to be able to be able to bear loads up to a certain point but then break afterward. If you made an indestructible buckle with a strong ass fabric, and the soldier's belt was caught on something, that's life threatening potentially. You'd want it to break away to save your life and a belt is designed to secure your clothes/uniform and hold things. It is interesting to see which buckle breaks first though. I'd like to see a video of the fabric strength tested as well.

Very cool.

Even though it wasn’t fastened right it still held that’s a win in my book still

Very nice

That new russian belt is the best..🤔🇷🇺👍841kg is very good..

I learn how turn a press into a expander thanks.

The land of VERY HEAVY pants!🎉🎉

Its shame you don't test Polish army belts old and new. This will be interesting

🍒 très intéressante vidéo Dommage,il manquait la Française 😭

So what does it mean in practical way?

also i would say it depents on how old the belts were ,spezialy the plastic clips usualy become brittle over time

Nice Gasper

I would pick US or CN, because it can hold my weight with all I can carry and have reserve, yet brake before my spine does would it catch (or anything I have on it catch) say on passing vehicle. I would definitely avoid both extremes (RU and GB).

the vintage American you locked up wrong way

This will be interesting.

So I guess this lets us know which belts to use as cargo lifting straps. They are all more than strong enough to do what they were meant for.

Any meaning for the compared result！

Not really of any significance but I found it very interesting.

the uk one oopsies

The old Russian belt looks so simple to make, compared to all the riveted modern belts. But the result is still pretty good and completely adequate.

La ceinture américaine des années 1940 n’était pas attachée correctement

Would of been cool to see a modern US belt with the Cobra buckle

thanks

Turkish or Ottoman products could also be tested

1:19 music from russian sherlock holms )))

That block of wood has done really well though …..

The "1940s USA" one was not a USA one. US Military had a different fastener. Speaking of which, it was not fastened right when tested.

Try the ALICE belt post Viet Nam.

but you are putting the kilos on a second-generation lever arm, which multiplies the force, the belts are being subjected to greater stresses than those indicated by the press

Nie ma pasa US 1940,to brytyjski pattern 58!

The 1940s belt is a British P44 oattern, is ntot from the US, and the buckle was fastened wrong.

Thks

Russians in their own style. "This shit is heavy, durable, mended with a hammer,"

2:01 deutsch Musik 😂

Što mi krivo kad ljudi unište dobar komad opreme ili oružja,da bi pokazao koliko je jak i kvalitetan.🤣👍

I'm not sure if having a belt that would rip through your guts if caught on machinery is ideal. If I got trapped I would want to be able to break free

Was not a 1940s U.S. belt because it would have been a m1936 pistol belt that should be dated somewhere in the 40s. You could have at least gotten a m1956 they are relatively the same belt and are easier to get.

You dont have tested the French belt named "ceinturon FAMAS F2" For me its the best, with this belt you can also open beer bottles

WW2 belt outperformed most of the modern ones and was only half fastened.

What do your intro comments mean: "Do not repeat at home then what you saw in this video?" Is this written by bots, or just poor grammar?

So basically Russian belt for battle and towing your neighbors car. Austian belt for battle and style bonus

1940s USA battle belt was not fastened correctly.

The UK one isn't issued anymore the one shown is from the 90s

7:48 new russian belt, the hydraulic press broke at 841 KG 😅

They probably all met their respective specifications (and cost 180 times the commercial model)

You need to redo a 1940s usa type bcs it wasnt coupled as it ahould have been

Nice but try french army belt F1 !!!

That was really interesting. Hahaha poor old Poms 😢. How embarrassing