Maybe the evolution stopped him 🤯

and Shakespeare

@@lit22006you dont need to have 100% info in a subject in order to talk about it. none of us is perfect, its the progress that counts.

What are you blathering about@@lit22006

He is active on github

Seems to be working, 140k views. It's an extremely well put together video

UKposts algo took me here from a video about WW1 lol They really want people to see it again

The algorithm has called us.

Count me in for the algorithm summons

boost

inventive

did not skip

Attention span passed ✅

Shut up bro

i did

😂😂😂😂

304 thumbs up, and here I am to leave the very first comment. People are getting silent these days, tired of violence.

Someone, think about the children!

What GOD must feel as well.

He’s the God we need lol

At least it now has a bit more but still not enough

Soon...soon. It just showed up in my suggestion feed _two days in a row_ ...The algorithm is speaking.

Still only 12600 views. This guy still has less than 500 subscribers. YT's algorithm is seriously broken. It recommends tons of mindless junk and doesn't prioritize anything of educational value. I guess it makes sense though, considering YT is more concerned with disabling useful features than they are with enabling people... *Cough* *Cough* "dislike buttons" *Cough*

16k now

@@flyingsquirrelfpv4866 17K

I did the same but even if i did not want to because i was so brainwashed by the tv i still qould have ended up this way because of how much truth can be proven and how everyone has more then 7 brainrotting seconds to open your mind to new worlds

I’m now convinced, we are all in a simulation

And I guess for people who believe in God, God is just doing a David move with all of us

@@AratjaUjotOurstories and the kill gene was always on!

Evolution lol. Show me creating life from non life. You dont get that as a gimme. Evolution trying to explain what happens AFTER life is already there is fun to think about....but its not science without showing life can just happen out of nowhere.

@@perrystuart8035 he lied. There are lots of explanations for making life from non-life.

@@KWifler Explanations are not science. You have to do it physically or it isnt in reality, just in your brain. Which is the entire point of my comment lol.

Really? I found it sort of sad. Poor guy is doing a simulation that proves the value of death, yet it is lost on him. What he should do is give the creatures compassion and hatred and then hardwire them so that hatred and, ultimately kill signals, are generated proportional to the product of the creatures compassion, the genetic similarity of any death in front of it and are directed at the assailant. Then he might learn something.

@@benearhart1224 thank god your not smart enough to this

@@ecko5541 oh man that just made my day. Insults about intelligent in screwed up English - the best.

@@benearhart1224 oh nooo i forgot a word and damn life must be sad then

@@benearhart1224 i too am disappointed in the conclusion of the video. Author's own simulation tells him that violence works as good as peace, if not better, but he still associates it with feral instincts and regards it only as a tool of injustice and disharmony.

Are you a progammer

@@cookoreo6890 no, he es a football player

@@MartinPirizDrums thought he was an astronaut in the ocean 😒

@@MartinPirizDrums Really? I got more of an artistic vibe from him

a engineering student

Jim: Billy the weather channel said we are gonna be hit by a meteor within a few day Billy: God Dammit not again

@@BoomBoomMushroom Just another day in Florida

I think that both perspectives must be taken into consideration. The simulations one exclude that fact and by doing this it isolate somehow the brain from the nature so in that way we can study much faster the brain development related to itself. If we also study the brain by adding the missing factor we emulate better the development in real life (where we are passing information not only by genes but also by environment) which is also very important. We can even learn more by studying both sides and compare them.

@@olarmariusalex I agree. It all depends on the end goal: if you want to study one particular feature isolating factors might help narrowing down the amount of information that you’ll have to process but it will make the model less accurate. Adding factors will make processing harder but the model will be closer to reality. And there’s one catch - in real life all factors could be connected and it might be that in order to get some kind of result you would need to simulate all of them because with just one of those missing we might not have the right conditions!

Note, that it's a simple simulation. But you're right. Another issue: generations don't born at the same day, don't live same duration and don't die together. Generations overlap. Also, a gene should control the lenght of their lifes, another should define the age when they make children. Another issue: they should use and consume energy (by eating each other). Who runs out of energy, he or she should die. Can't stop: they should produce, waste (shit). Others should consume it, it would fill the energy, but not as much as if he or she eating other. A gene should control whether the particle can kill other ones (predator), or just eat, well, other's waste (vegan).

This model is simple about how early single cell organisms could interact and swim away from hot dangerous places. Food could passively diffuse into them can be assumed. Overlapping generations would maybe only relevant when the age sense is enabled and when age variable has some useful functionality.

Unfortunately, that wouldn't work here. The simulation is set up to see if the population can navigate to a certain area. If they generated close to their parents you would introduce a bias. For example, in the first simulation, all generations that began in the east would just keep reproducing regardless of their genome. You could change the selection criteria, but I think the way it is now lets you see what's happening clearly.

viewers habits evolved to share it?

TRUE STORY: Our owners like to steer us for a reason. I don't know where the journey ends, but the ride is very enjoyable. Long live Our Owners!

He lost me at being the first person to ever claim breeders are evolved an focusing on breeding is evolution. I don't think anything outside of this software he programmed to act this way supports this. Even breeders hate being called breeders yet according to this software it would be like being Kobe Bryant.

@@willyreeves319 youtube algorithm evolved to feed it to the right crowd

That's pretty quick for UKposts tbh

If only he added tiktok sped up music

Facts

​@@Lemjanmusicbruh 🌚

@@Lemjanmusichell no

@@soulslip 😂💀

Can we please see this program simulated?

Great insight

you could either get a mob mentality that swarm the killers, (without consequences, ie 'legal kill') OR a couple of 'sherifs' evolve that seek out the killers........

just what I was thinking, you should try to set it up to see if you can promote cooperation. One thought: if you have the kill gene, other individuals can see that and kill you ahead of time, you can call that the self defense gene. Another idea: Maybe then add Size gene to make individuals more likely to win a fight, However, being bigger will require you to collect more resources in order to survive. You can show it graphically by altering the actual size of the dots!

@@mattsowerbutts4163 That's a great idea! mob swarm love it

If you want more, check out carykh evolution on UKposts

Facts

My guy wrote a whole paragraph

Zimmerman St. Charles is dead

@@KitchenSinkGaming73 Holy shit a few words are an entire paragraph to you? This says a lot about you...

i knew a lot of this bc ive watched a LOOOOOT of evolution vids. but im soo happy he assumes nothing. i would prefer that. this is a grade A video for people who know nothing about this thing! And he keeps it engaging too

He has a few more on Vimeo...

I am an old Irishman and can safely say this is a highly evolved and sophisticated individual who ain't got time for no youtube shenanigans! LoL Imagine them as like the hottest woman in the room. They ain't got no time for my silly shenanigans! It would take something special to draw their attention, or you must be lucky and witness their magnificence as it unfolds, as it did here with this video. Just discovering this myself, I imagine he works doing interesting things and, much like in this video, I imagine him doing these types of fun things in a world that doesn't involve youtube overly much. My own world doesn't include those things either. I am aware of this youtube thing right here, obviously, and love exploring the knowledge contained herein, but it isn't a priority. I am often busy just living life, in a world far far away, powered by an infinitely small, very subtle and basically nonexistent, singularity, within the singularity. It's something I fondly call the duality, the duality actually is Within the singularity. My world is like a black hole trapped inside a black hole, event horizon within event horizon. I couldn't make this up if I tried. How deep can we go? Perhaps not objectively real like the singularity, nor as magnificent, but my world is real enough for this old Irishman, and still magnificent because it was derived from such a perfect hottie of a singularity! Wow, what a babe, that source of my world. Can you imagine the magnificence of a hottie that is powerful enough to be the source of universes? Now THAT is a total babe right THAR! Right Thar! LoL haha sorry, shenanigans!

@@QuantumElectroDynamic why are you so thirsty for this man lol

@@QuantumElectroDynamic one of the best binary drinks I had

@@QuantumElectroDynamic lmao 😭

But isn't Argentina south west of Germany?

@@ianmeade7441 goated reply

@@ianmeade7441 it's north-east if you go far enough

Fake you must be Russian

@@ianmeade7441 wow

yes. riveting.

@@VickMcbread I know right!

Just like us

let him cook

agreed need a super computer for sure

Watch carefully what happens around 40 minute 🙂 increased capabilities doesn’t really affect organisms performance already, not nearly as much as going from 2 to 8 neurons. You can have whole computation power in the world, but it wont really unfold any discoveries. Regular computers are already very capable of doing very complex simulations, even what’s shown is amazing. Having more power is cool, but I guess what I want to say is that you can do a lot even with mediocre hardware, don’t think you need a supercomputer to carry those experiments.

Thanks

Thank you! This should be top comment

yeah the next step of those might be a cool scenario where mutation can change the number of connections and having "food" factor, maybe making creatures that found more food, then they consume survive and reproduce. then having something like 1 food is worth like 10 connections. so a creature that have like 300 connections need 30 food to survive.

A big brain is definitely evolved and maintained in a population only when life is a challenge that requires a brain. When survival is simple and intelligence is not required, a brain is an expensive luxury. There are primitive chordates called ascidians that have a brain as free-swimming larvae and lose most of it when they become stationary adults.

One way to sort of simulate the effect of a larger brain could be to add a delay of one simulation step to each internal neuron. It would enable more complex behaviors with loops but cause more complex networks to potentially move slower. It would require modifying the simulation code quite a bit though as the state of each network would have to be carried over to the next simulation step.

Add a consume action, so they can potentially cannibalize each other

@@reyariass I think that would result in the population splitting into a "herbivore" majority and a "carnivore" minority.

Not exactly a video game and I'm not sure how much/where it is still available but there used to be a pretty neat 3D evo sim called 3DVCE that evolved 3D creatures composed of evolved physical bodies that moved with simple, evolved neural networks. The selection options were pretty limited but you could get some really really interesting results if you ran the sim long enough.

brainlet redditor take

@@ayylmao394 cut them some slack

@@ayylmao394 This video but interactive. Who wouldn't want that?

The closest thing that I know of is bibits (check it out on UKposts)

Same

Shut

According to Vid-IQ UKposts wasn't really promoting this year-old video until two months ago and then suddenly - Boom! Tons of views.

You should explore complex systems

This is really good. You need a Patreon!

fr like why we all getting this suggested now 😭

Fr. Amazing work. The world needs more.

@@VanyaTheSlavic are you okay

@@VanyaTheSlavic He could be dead for all we know.

​@@VanyaTheSlavic that.. was a joke. you need help?

Sin leads to hell, keep focused, the devil is on earth to destroy your soul. But God wants to give you everlasting Joy. But our sin is keeping this from happening. You must stop sinning and turn to Jesus Christ he is your only hope. He can save you from eternal suffering under the Earth, where hell is hot.. Not everyone who calls me their Lord will get into the kingdom of heaven. Only the ones who obey my Father in heaven will get in. Matthew 7:21.....

@@SINLEADSTOHELL Bro that's way off topic

anyhow i loved when he just went to onto gen 50 and said "those are the great great- oh never mind"

@@SINLEADSTOHELL uh what? what does this have to do with the topic of the vid?

@@Mark-Wilson your average extreme zealot I guess

hardest quote 2021

Your evolved!

@@User-ed5tg But what the hell this is all about? 😂 I don't understand anything

Sussy

@@lorenzo689 Sussy Begula

That's amazing. I'm happy for you, friend

What's pretty interesting to me is that this exact method of programming neural net AIs is currently one of the most successful and promising machine learning models for many applications. It's a pretty perfect (and cool) example of the NEAT algorithm and a great illustration of how it works as a general method to make neural net AIs that are effective at solving all kinds of problems..

😂

That’s amazing, what’s even more interesting is he hasn’t uploaded in 3 years. Bro probably has no clue he just changed the trajectory of your entire life

You should be making videogames bro! At least one indie game from you would probably rock

There is a similar algorithm used to train neural net AIs called NEAT. Genetic algorithms that work like this (testing groups of nets, keeping the survivors, replicate and either combine or mutate) are turning out to be one of the most successful AI machine learning models.

Being socially adept to find a mate, if included in the simm, it would yelled much different results in the Kill switch simm.

Sad fuck

ALL THEORY...Look up outa the tv mandates...g..trainz hew man isum..

@@paulmillard9535 “g trainz hew man isum” - please articulate if you want anyone to appreciate what you may have to say

its all bull shit data in dna is not undersude i believe in nateral satlicion but not evelution mutions are damiage

@@stanleydavidson6543 though the credibility of your belief lacks legibility or factual reference, I’d dedicate time to follow up any sources you have if you can provide links as a counterpoint to this extremely detailed and widely respected area of study. Much more worthwhile to share links and peer reviewed scientific data than argue our relative understanding of this phenomenon

For real, is any of the comments on this comment real?

He's using radioactive Cytosine already. @3:42 The Nitrogen has 5 bonds rather than the usual 3 NH3= :-)

Hopefully he programming the software made him able to explain how it works

Couldn't agree more!

I love how he calles his community "friends"

I kid you not that is the same exact route I took to get here, Minecraft, TrackMania and then this beauty

im actually confused, i watched someone build a computer in minecraft, watched a video about cheating in trackmania speedruns and then ended up here

1pqqq

@@larafields5169 I agree! Couldn't have said it better myself.

Evolution and AI seems to be barred from games as an intelligence inhibitor.. which really sucks.. a game such as worldbox would be a great starting point but it, an many like it are run by.. evil. I'm not sure on the best strategy to fight this yet. Suggestions welcome.

@@richardward6747 The ol' "if you want something done right, you gotta do it yourself" seems like the simplest way. Find some people that aren't greedy and evil and who share the same passion and do it. I'd help but... Today i was wrecking my brains trying to understand how to create classes and to count how many times a number occured in a list... In python... So yeah, good luck. I'd love a video game with hyper realistic characters and consequences. Also a great crafting, harvesting/gathering and skills system. But then again, if you were to acomplish what i imagine... You'd create a whole new, real world with real people, although seen as npcs by many of us (and i think we all know how gamers treat npcs)

@@migolan6606 thanks man.. I would love to program a good game, while I ain't a great programmer I probably could.. but more important things require my attention at this time.. maybe eventually.

@@richardward6747 do give me notice when you start, if you still remember. If i survive the wars, the ¥|RU$ and whatever else this decade throws at us and we still live in a 'peaceful' world, i'd love to make such a game too

@@richardward6747 also good luck with whatever requires your attention

Thank you

There wasn’t a minute i wanted to skip.

The conditions for evolution. 1 = create an intelligently designed software program. haha. the irony.

I was just stamping for myself originally. thanks for the likes though 😀

lel

@@flueepwrien6587 lel? a french lol?

I was hoping they would use the pheromone for reproduction but also so the kill population can track them down. So the selection would be did they move to adjacent squares and were they similar enough to reproduce and the selection out of population would be did you get killed (eaten), or age > 100. run and see how long the eaters have before cannibalism and highlander (there can be only one) sets in or as it would be difficult to reproduce when you want to kill those beside you how long until the eaters die out. A hunger number would also be good. No more resetting the population to a known quantity just let it rock.

Hi David I may have a simple solution for the kill neuron: change the scenery :) Most of the comments here assume that the genenpool needs (rather complex) additions to solve the problem of the kill gene. But that is not how evolution works. Evolution is blind, but is perfectly able to “control” the kill gene, probably even with as few as 2 existing genes and a few connections. Also David reasons backwards when he wonders about his kill gene. He forgets to think about one of the 5 key features that drives evolution. Selection. David creates selective environments, but wonders why evolution is so cruel to allow for a killer gene to kill so many, even when none of these environments selects for traits related to killing, because there is space enough for everyone to fit in the box. What does it mean?! It means that evolution is blind. His environments don’t select for killers, but they also don’t select for non killers. Evolution is blind. If the environment doesn’t care about killers, then evolution doesn’t care (that is.. as long as there is at least one survivor at the end of the generation to fulfill reproduction) To solve (control) the “issue” of the killer gene, create a selective environment that selects for it. The kill gene works by bumping into each other, right? Create a selective environment based upon bumping into each other for reproduction. If the kill gene is active they are not able to reproduce. 2 genes organisms in this environment would quickly select for not having a kill gene active. To maintain a kill gene but not use it always (control urge to kill) needs more intelligence, but could be achieved with maybe 3 to 5 genes already and a lot of connections. And of course a selective environment; by using the first rule (Mating) + an area too small to fit the whole population (competition for space) should do the trick. David thanx for the video! Hope you will continue making videos and research evolution. I’ll follow you

I see you want to create cat girls

@@lollidomoni9523 Don't we all?

@@fatitankeris6327 Lmao. Underrated comment.

Thanks, and good wishes for your journey in the world of biology.

Marine biology I assume?

Is this a jojo reference!!!

@@howlu9086 maybe...

Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont make a joke about marine biology Dont

I like this one

well if it makes you feel better, mutations are just another word for cancer and vice versa.

@@mikkirefur No??😂 Mutations don't necessarily result in cancer.

@@timr3621 no that is right. Usually the hardware & software and self repairing nature of programmed dna can fix itself. What a design !

Or they choose career over family and hit he "wall".

Yes! Amen to the video, and amen to you for noticing and appreciating the greatness of the video! Kudos all around!! 😁👍

These mfing bots in the comment section having coversation 😭😭

38:30 How it works is when N0 activates, N1 suppresses N0, and suppresses itself as well. This little solution here has this result: N0 triggers, triggering N1, which suppresses N0 and itself, effectively resetting the neural network.

Don't be discouraged by your level of understanding of coding. I've been a developer for 10 years and 95% of my work is very rudamentary. It will also get better as you build new things. Take python and your best ideas and run with it! I took lots of biology classes in college and there's plenty of work to do in your field!

I hope you didn't waste your time on the learn to code meme since chatgpt can do all the stuff for you now lmao

​@@Noqtisyou are why idiocracy is a documentary not a comedy smh

Good catch. It works similar to a computer memory latch

40:18 lol you should check this one out, it looks extremely impressive however if we compare that to our brains its not even like 0.001%

I'm trying to make my own (much simpler) project following the same ideas, but I'm stuck at the internal neurons. I don't understand what I want from them, and it seems like you might. I tried poking around in the linked code, but haven't found it yet. If you could point me in the right direction, or share a resource that explains the concept, I'd appreciate it :)

@@Dnallohes They're just there to be generic intermediate nodes that are able to connect to each other and pass signals around. Just having them available for this increases the number of different possible ways that the input signals can flow through the brain and be linked to each other, and therefore the possible complexity of the AIs behavior. If you're familiar with electrical engineering, you'll see quickly that one of the things neurons can do, just by being connected to each other in certain ways with signals going through them, is form various kinds of circuits, including things like logic gates (AND/OR/XOR/NOT, etc), timers, and memory circuits. The signals from the inputs going through these circuits allow the neural net brains to hold and act on more possible informational states, process the inputs in more complex ways, and even learn to correlate them (since the internal neurons can connect to each other as well). The more neurons & connections available in a neural network, the more complex its circuitry, and therefore its processing, can ultimately get. It can develop memory, learn to recognize patterns, adapt to changing conditions, get and use feedback on the sensory results of its previous actions, etc, ALL just depending on precisely how the neural circuits in its brain are connected. The neat thing is you don't have to understand what it's doing or program the neurons to do any of this, just let them connect however they want and mutate randomly. Over generations of selection, the successful surviving neural networks will become smarter and smarter (up to their capacity), evolving the right wiring to succeed (and/or call down SkyNet... but that's what you get for activating the 'kill' neuron...)

@@blissful4992 it’s insane, the idea that their brains are that complicated for them to do something so simple makes me appreciate us as people

This should be a movie

@@jinminetics599 I mean, it's more or less the plot of gurren lagann.

@@UKpostsTookMyNickname.WhyNot You do sound drunk indeed xD hopefully you can clarify when you sober up cause I have no clue what you're trying to say

@@Laezar1 😂

An interesting related idea is the observation that brain size changes tend to lag behind body size changes, that is to say, if your body is growing in size over evolutionary history, your brain size doesn't increase at a proportional rate. This had led to the hypothesis that reduction or gain in body size primarily leads to disparities between brain and body sizes. I seem to recall reading about size reductions in our primate evolutionary history for instance. Non-migratory birds tend to have more encephalization when compared to migratory birds - likely because nervous tissue is too energetically costly when competing with similarly expensive migration patterns where birds might have to fly thousands of kilometers. Our large brained non migratory birds dont have to worry with competing costs, they just need to support their larger brains. It's hypothesized that larger brained birds are more behaviorally flexible and can capitalize on niches that aren't available to smaller brained individuals. This would stratify where certain individuals of a species can survive (based on individual brain differences), acting as a soft reproductive isolation. Which may have contributed to the diversity of avians fauna today

When you do can you link it? im genuinely wanting to run this for myself. Ill pay

​@@tylermanning4321I'm thinking about it too 😂

how far did u get

Since this isn't happening I'll just make it. Give me like a week tops.

@@hellvet3 u got thisss

adoption?

@@TheElectricalls Thank you for pointing that out.

@@brandonmidkiff8200 o>

You, Sir, are a gentleman and a scholar

@@ChaineYTXF You are certainly most welcome.

Starvation, or it's equivalent.

800 generations at max and then drops nearly 1000x in 100 generations? and you are not doubting at all? :D im sorry to pull you back into reality but Jesus Christ is on the throne and the world is about to get judged.

@@lt3742 uh?

@@matteosposato9448 seek for Jesus Christ of Nazareth while He may be found

@@lt3742 Errrm, what the heck has this to do with my reply. Nothing is what.

@@lt3742 wtf are you on about? If God is real, he's a psychopath. I'll step to the left if his bastard son shows up, no way in hell would I spend an eternity with an emotional maniac like that.

I was so disappointed when I went to his channel and couldn't binge years worth of content...damn it

he quit? whered you find that info? did he say why he quit?

Men in black took him in as a researcher. Now doing top secret work.

"two and one half" never understood this americanism. wonder if you ever say "two and two halves" or "two and three halves"? plus it just sounds wrong

​@@artanaillazentujin3449 he only has 2 videos on his channel and hasnt posted in 2 years, pretty safe to say he either quit or died or something

Don't you mean this was "great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great" to watch?

worked in his "favor"? Shouldn't it be subjective, unbiased??

I’m sure there will be iPhone apps for this in a few years

@@Ty-mf3vz the term worked in someone's favour doesn't imply that it isn't subjective or unbiased. It means exactly what you want it to mean. It basically means that despite the inherent randomness he got lucky that it worked out the way it did.

@@Ty-mf3vz Unbiased? What makes you think the UKposts algorithm is unbiased? In fact, they make a point of telling us of at least some of the biases they employ.

Can I colab?

Indeed so do i, too bad we were too scared to fail and copy pasted everything instead of being inspired to learn more!