Yep ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qJx6dn2ciGqUp3k.html Fax.

Hiii

safiya ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bWCFnXxtr4BjlKc.html

Seems so cool to me honestly, thanks for all the content you :)

This was such a cool video

As someone who did 3 years of photoshop in high school, I COULD DO BETTER.

especially the final dress? the texture on the chest is so flat and low rez what the heck

as a person w just eyes, it looks very obviously photoshopped

For me the first one wasn’t too too bad (I still could see that it was photoshoped) but after that it became more and more obvious…I do understand tho people saying it looked good in the sense that if she did have the real clothes it’d be cute but the editing itself was awful 🥴

They didn’t even do any shadows. And the sharp edges hurt my eyes

The thing with that is like, if you don't come into it knowing there's photoshop involved then it's just like there's something weird here but Idk what it is

I think on social media people are wont to overlook shoddy/ unprofessional photoshop since everyone edits the photos they post. But yeah as a graphic designer i can totally tell especially with the lighting angles and shadows, and the different resolutions between the photos and the 3D render. The shadows and blending the edges of the render into the photo are just atrocious

@@Rose-jz6sx definitely! Of course that happens with many people. It’s just easier to spot specific reasons why it looks “off” when you’ve done similar things yourself. :)

@@k80_ oh yeah, I totally agree XD I wonder what sort of pipeline they have for all of this, professional editing is expensive and time consuming, I don’t know how these price points are lining up with a big company involved, either o.O

I think there’s a possibility that people who are online more consume so many edited images it just doesn’t occur to them to question things as much anymore-There’s a possibility they know that everything is retouched to some level or another, so they just assumed that it was a bad retouch job as opposed to an actual fake outfit. I think there’s also a culture of it being almost rude or mean to point out when someone you like is retouching their photos, which might keep people from saying something. I was pretty disturbed by some of the photoshop jobs though-it worries me that this company is contracting out the editing to some kind of digital sweatshop where an artist gets paid 2 cents an image or something. That’s the only reason I can think some of these would have been done in such a mediocre fashion. That would also match generally with how we know the tech industry treats creatives-They love to middleman between us and our customers so that they can make most of the money and deliver a suboptimal experience to people on both ends. (Edited for spelling error).

This hit it right on the head. This is a symptom of how there's more effort into looking happy than actually being happy.

These are the exact words to describe the feeling of dread I had watching the video

Absolutely. Dread is the word.

Word.

It's not that social media is more important than real life sometimes it's just for the fun of it lol

@@Juanmaligno if it was just for fun it wouldn't cost 30-1000 dollars.

hopefully that will be fixed as they work on it more-

This is EXACTLY what i was thinking of.. I saw it instantly and I am just kind of mediocre in skill. It is pretty bad photoshopping imo. Looks like a rushed job to me. Or maybe done by people not very familiar with the surrounding tones, lighting and shadow.

They should shade it to match the surroundings. Shadows aren’t just black

I think as an artist everything kills you

FRRR THIS IS WHAT I THINK ABOUT. Like, why don't they give at least som shading to safiya's skin, or whatever 😩

sewing is harddd!!!

@@jester42069 but extremely worth it, I'd say

What a great idea! We'd be like the punks in the 70s/80s, but even weirder!!

lol that’d be hilarious 11/10 would participate

What if ur blind deaf paralyzed and have no Limbs? How will U SEW

The lighting in the pictures isn't exactly right. I feel like they should ask for a panorama of the environment you're taking photos in: in order to get better lighting and reflections on the clothes.

Too few ping-pong balls for real-time, I'm betting. And, they're never going to get a true skin tight look at this level. It's always going to look like something stretched over a plastic mannequin. That ping-pong ball technology is desperately going to need an upgrade.

@@minipop1032 They are a long way away from matching lighting to the environment. I just watched how VFX experts do that over on the Corridor channel, and it's a labor intensive process involving multiple stages of captures. It's just not going to happen in the next decade. That said, the flouncy stuff looks pretty good, at least at the places where you expect to be flowing away from the body.

Why don't people use the actual word "though"?

@@englishatheart why don't people use the actual words "do not"?

I’d be friends with anyone who wore that outfit tbh

Yeah I need those

Virtual friends 🥰

@@astrokitten9323 perfect :D

@@catlvr-kg9ol Maybe you can buy a digital character. How shallow and dumb.

Actual cheap dresses are 30 bucks nowadays.... they must buy some expensive rich people brands in the most luxurious places of new york to think 30 bucks is "cheaper"

@@LilyUnicorn If they're new, yes. But at least you get to wear them more than once.

that’s the price for a pretty cheap dress nowadays tho. Some of the clothes on this website is like 200 bucks tho. maybe that’s a better example?

SMH. These people literally make it into a whole different thing on its own.

$35 for a single *PHOTO* of a dress

I don't think these are NFTs (or at least were sold to Safiya as NFTs).

@@isabellamorris7902 What Safiya bought was not an nft, they are talking about when she mentioned it

can you explain it better? I don't understand why NFTs would be bad for environments, since it's virtual

@@MariaPaula-uw3ds they way they are bought uses the same amount of electricity a house would use in a day.

@@MariaPaula-uw3ds ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kYGQrI2tj2efmps.html

Totally. They make you feel like you're buying the flashy fashion, but what you're actually purchasing is a digitally altered photo of yourself, and that product appears to be rather sub-par.

zayummmm shitting on teenagers smh i see how it is😔

I totally agree! none of the photos looked realistic at all, and it bugged me to no end that she kept saying they're so realistic even when i can see it from a tiny thumbnail and KNOW its photoshopped on badly. its so bad i really hope this isnt what fashion turns into

@@Rubarbleh Nah, you misread me; I was saying most teenagers are probably better at photoshop than the companies she paid. The average teen knows far more about photo editing/etc than older generations. I said that people would be better off paying their teenagers to do this because they'd do a better job 😂

As a digital artist shouldn’t you be in on this too? This can be profitable for your line of work. I don’t understand why you creat digital art and hate photo bashing simultaneously

I really like this idea. Of course you will still run into the issue of the item simply not being made the way you thought in some instances, but likely far less often. I would really love some new pants, for instance, but at 4'11" buying pants in the actual store is just as much of a struggle as online.

@@411blah411 Are you also 4'11" or does your name stand for the actual term 411? The former would be such a coincidence.

Amazon does have this SORT OF already, for like TV's and some furniture and such, so it's not too far fetched tbh

Yes!!!! 100% agree!!! ✨🖤✨ I love this idea!!!

fast fashion sites like shein and fashion nova would benefit greatly with this

Tbh, this is one of the dumbest things i’ve ever heard

Why is it so mind blowing to you? It can make sense for a lot of stuff. People who make a living out of fashion pictures could use this instead of overconsuming, and since it doesn't exist there's no limit to the creativity. One comment mentioned that in the movie industry it's pretty common to dress up actors in virtual clothes. I just think it's a super cool thing

@@giuliad223 But wouldn't it be cheaper to pay professional photoshop artists to draw clothes for you? Not to mention that they could photoshop it properly with all the shading etc. Paying thousand of dollar (Some of them) seems a bit much to me.

I couldn't agree more. I don't see the point in it either. People are letting technology run their lives way too much. We need to get back to the simpler life we had like in the 80s and 90s. Those were much happier times, and not so complicated. (Jan Griffiths).

@@Scrizal you're forgetting the design. That's what you're actually paying. Yes you can ask a photoshop expert to do it and it would be cheaper but it would be a graphic tee and that's not the point. I will agree that the photoshop on the cheap ones looks botched, what can you expect though? You can't have an original design and a good photoshop job for only 30$

safiya ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bWCFnXxtr4BjlKc.html

Yep ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qJx6dn2ciGqUp3k.html Fax.

O

I need this in my life

Pls put iced/cold coffee in the face mask maker (Eve) 🥰

TV, digital books, any in person entertainment.... all things where you don't get a physical product. This isn't really different.

Well there is definitely someone out there who is taking the time to (questionably) Photoshop these garments in, so they need to get paid for their work haha

@@savannahleslie3515 Yes but you can watch a TV and you can read a book...seriously are you really trying to defend this con ?

@@drewukdrew I don't really see it as a con if it's delivering exactly what it says it is.

Rush Hour!!

VOUCH

Agreed, as a regular human, I would be smacked by my mom for buying something like this and for what? An instagram pic

Thing is, why do they even feel the need to show off? Even if digital clothing is more sustainable (we still waste electricity), it still supports their low self-esteem, shopping addiction or any worse mental illness.

@@Offensive_Username I suppose it’s their ‘job’ and they make money off of it, however this is far better than buying off bloody shein or Ali express

@@KF-tq2df one of them at least tries to help poor people that needs clothing. the other is just a playground for rich people

YES

That's actually genius

Idk. The way it's photoshopped on is not necessarily the way it would fit in real life. It would definitely need to be disclosed at the very least that it's digital. So people aren't mislead.

Or influencers get a “green screen” outfit that can be used for several different outfits several times. The opportunities are endless!

@@karleighelizabethlust4994 they never wear the same thing twice though

😹😹😹😹😹😹

More like hold my merkin *WHEEZE*

You where blessed to have your comment hearted in the sea of hogwash but now the bots decend upon it like vultures with the rotting carcus of a sellout link to fill the now foul air.

lol

Hi 👋😹😻

I'll just screen shot a pick of the item and do it myself. Free and would turn out better than what they did. This is ludicrous. I know Saf is super polite, but all of this was garbage for the price it demanded. A few bucks? Sure, pay 5 dollars to photoshop on for one picture (and badly for that matter) to wear an outfit that would likely not actually work on a human body or be wearable. But 35 dollars? I can go have a nice meal, or get a new jacket for that price. I'd get it if we lived mainly in VR wherein your avatar actually wears the outfit and you pay for the 3-D model and it's permenantly on your account or something, but this? This feels like the world went mad. I don't understand why people aren't calling it out for what it is, a scam. You get nothing you couldn't of done/gotten yourself.

@Phoenix 𝙾𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝙼𝚢 PROFILE It's commissioned art, price depends on the expected creativity and beauty of the result. This level of service used to be for really rich people only.

I agree with you, but to a certian extend. For fast fashion, modelling and high off brands like LV , this would be a great substitute for real clothes. Since these companies create millions of waste by only creating cheap clothing that is trending and then throwing it away once a new trend arrives. It's less wasteful and less exploitive. And let's be real here. Fashion is fueled by blood. Sweat shops, millions of underpaid, "workers" slaving away in a factory for fast fashion, only for their product which they made 0.20 cent from to be worn 2 times and then added to the waste and pollution the world is already facing.

In the future VR and real life will be one

This is equivalent to just paying for someone to photoshop something for you. I mean it is. I don't really see the parallel of not owning it as you are mostly just doing it to post on social media which is the only use case for it

Unfortunately the process of making the files for virtual clothing uses up so much energy that it is actively harming our environment. NFTs are not sustainable.

@@toadfrend3490 these aren't NFTs though, just 3d models photoshopped onto pictures.

Absolutely

@Megan Ryan the fashion industry isn't sustainable either, that hasnt stopped anyone from wearing clothes.

I think it’s very, very sad…like….you’re paying to have a fake dress put on you so you can post a picture on Instagram…? How can someone be so obsessed with socials and self-image to reach such a level? It’s honestly scary…

@Julia - 𝙾𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝙼𝚢 PROFILE oh wow a supposedly bot account is commenting a serious post

Thank you, for real, thank you. I pretty much just a few days ago learned about NFT's... and why they're harmful, and it's just so crazy to me that even on that level, we can fuck the environment. Like, I learned from this acrylic pouring artist that did a few of those, just what those were, and I'm just here wondering... why? And I wonder if this is going to be the next generation (if theres one by the time we reach our older years...) technology that will just confuse us immensely when we get older. I doubt it, I think that the impact they have is just too much, but at the same time, when have they ever cared about it? I still havent been able to grasp the concept fully as of now, specially since many of the people that talk about them just absolutely dismiss the impact that they have, but, time will tell I guess.

There are much more efficient NFT minting options than ETH that relies on proof of work. Proof-of-stake tokens are like 100x more efficient

☝☝☝ NFTs can also die

Yeah its a dumb scam, they never cared about the environment if they are planning to use NFTs

Exactly! Why the heck would anyone do this over just wearing normal clothes

Yeah I'll be honest I don't understand digital clothing because you can't wear it out anywhere for its price TwT like we still gotta wear clothes

@@elizatoponce9375 for me it seems that it's just a thing for rich people who don't have space in their closets for new clothes, but want cute photos to post 😁

It costs less to actually make many of these clothes in real life, this feels honestly like some money laundering scheme

Using the argument of "Not wanting to create clothing waste" is complete garbage to me, for sure a "we are a 100% waste-free company" kind of thing. Total bullshit marketing thing. lol

I feel the same about this whole digital art thing, when I first learned about it I felt pranked and still kinda think I'm in crazy town anytime I see someone selling NFTs for hundreds of dollars.

No no you’re right

@@sonjapersch6074 digital clothes vs digital art is completely different.. the clothes make actually no sense-like you still need clothes whether we’re a digital age or not. digital art, however, is something so needed in our also digital society. believe it or not, the computer doesn’t do shit for you when it comes to drawing (unless you use stamps and stuff which i very much hate). art (i’m referring to painting and digital painting and such medias) will always require creativity, talent, and effort, all of which digital art still requires. i don’t understand how people can criticize digital when other art like abstract exist (which i know you didn’t say that, i’m just putting that out there). nfts are a great way for artists work to not go unappreciated in this digital age, since people harness the idea that digital =/= art, which just isn’t true. i can definitely see how it looks that way though, considering things like digital clothes exist, but once you become more accustomed to digital art, you can understand the effort behind it.

@@sophie6744 there's no way you're trying to justify digital art while saying that digital clothing - which is a form of digital art - is ridiculous? At least with the digital clothes no one else can use it, so I'd argue NFTs are even stupider. I'm not saying digital artists shouldn't be paid, I mean: good for them! But it's just unbelievable anyone WOULD spend money on a jpg.

so im not the only one who immediately thought of that story??? at the risk of sounding like a boomer its 2021 and i can still barely stomach the concept of paying for reusable cosmetics in a video game...... and now we're paying for single use cosmetics for our actual selves ???? for what??? insta likes???

True and either ways it looks fake I don’t think it’s worth it

And that you can only "photograph" once

You basically paying the artist who created the clothes and the photo editor.

i guess it makes sense for influencers tho :/

seriously, I was confused. you pay for the clothes to be photoshopped on you but you can't have the item? 😭

Yeah I think with some advancements it could be as simple as like using a program to do it for you. Similar to how people create vtubers and such. You sort of buy a 3D render of just clothing items and you can change it. Which this could actually come in handy for things other than just pictures.. as I said, you could use it for vtubers, VR avatars, etc. Like literally buying a digital wardrobe you could use in many ways.

100%

Do you really think someone that spends money just to have a picture with a different outfit is going to have a small sustainable wardrobe in real life? Someone shallow enough to do this is going to continue to buy multiples of everything People like talking about being sustainable while always using the latest technology. Is switching your phone every few months or even a year sustainable? Traveling all the time? Eating avocado toast that has to travel a long way to you, etc?

Would be awesome to be able to use these outfits on VR platforms that you can make your avatar wear.

Very true! My thought is that once it catches on, cheaper alternatives will be around and likely more advanced technology too, sort of like face filters. Maybe even free! Which would be great for the environment.

NTF’s just as bad for the environment as plastics. I was the one who “Berated” Saf on YT. One evil is not worse than the other. There is still a huge Carbon footprint when making e fashion.

@@jennifercriss1897 these arent NFTs its 3d models photoshopped onto people

@@jennifercriss1897 The energy issues with NFTs only happen with the blockchain/cryptocurrency aspect that makes them "exclusive". This digital fashion is not exclusive, it's just photoshop - no more energy than digitally drawing something or editing a video. Actual crypto/NFTs suck ass, but this isn't them.

@@jennifercriss1897 but e fashion isn't being sold through crypto is it?

@@jennifercriss1897 girl calm down

its a modern twist on the emperors new clothes! lol

This summarizes everything I feel about this lol

@@safiya The one biggest thought i had running through my head watching it was our future descendants living in VR thinking "aww, look how cute they are with their shitty tech" 😂 Yeah I'm not totally opposed to this, I just feel like we're still in our infancy stage with technology and we're all trying new and wacky things to see what works lol

You're basically paying for the photoshopping. If you add in the cost for the design itself, the 30 to 40 Dollar tier isn't even that expensive. I mean, you probably don't whip that up in an hour. That being said: yeah, for us 'normal' people it is indeed a lot of money for nothing.

ive seen better cc than some of the clothes tho. like what was the texture of the first one how did people think its real

Nah, a CC creator could probably do better

How dare you, sims fashion was MUCH better 😂😂😂

Sims CC creators have been slaying though, even their announcements of new creations are better than the advertisement of these digital clothes

So accurate!

I know, I'm sitting here thinking being able to show the awesomeness of her commenters is the only reason this has any real benefit

money does not measure worth. it measures how much someone, somewhere is willing to pay for it

we live in a society

For $1000 it better come with an actual dress

RIGHT???!?! no one is talking about it💀💀💀 I'm acually scared. Fahrenheit 451 anyone????👀👀👀👀

I just read about FB groups that are recommending people not go to Emergency Rooms & to take their loved ones out of ICUs in favor of home treatment. Not to mention that some people believe in the "crisis actor" thing - to the point of harassing families. Yes, people are that disconnected from reality.

Yup. Reminds me more of stuff like SAO and digital reality is just going to be used as another escape people focus on instead of improving their habits in reality

This is literally the emperor having no clothes. Very disturbing. Fun, but disturbing.

@@aina3387 exactly what I was thinking

Agree

exactly! All of those outfits would've looked better if they added some shadowing. Honestly, for 40-60$ per pic, they could've at least done that...

it's way too much money for someone in their basement. It's a scam.

I feel the exact same way, too expensive for such average photoshop skills-

Yeah i thought the shadows were off for all the photos

I understand how it seems expensive from the outside POV, when you only get one photo for that money. But you also have to consider the cost of 3d software that was used to model, texture, pose and render that 3d garment PLUS photoshop. The amount of labour that goes into making one photo is sadly something that people who are outside 3d industry do not consider. YES its not best edit, and YES it is on a pricier side, but honestly paying 40$ for 2 - 4 hours of work is not that much.

Absolutely, it's one of the thing si love about her 😂

i was thinking like a subscription would make sense!! i think they are pretty new so we shall see how they end up addressing that lol

Yeah, because I get that you pay for both the design and the photoshop-job, but logically you should only have to pay for the design once.

subscription makes sense to me, maybe with a "per month" cap so the photoshoppers dont get overworked

I'm thinking they should sell by sets of pictures, like, pay for 3, 5, 7 or 10 pictures, with basically no expiration limit. If the piece is really basic, in the sense that the model wont change that much, like sunglasses, earrings, or shoes, maybe sell by the dozen, but if the garment is harder to model and adjust, then sell by smalled bulks. It would be more like renting an outfit but instead of hours, it's pictures.

Until the end of the video, I expected the outfits to be added to a virtual closet to be reworn

idk about the new designers thing, digital arts programs can be pretty expensive specially 3d ones. I agree with everything else though, it's a tool for artists as well as a good way for fashion influencers to get to show and try a lot of clothes without contributing to the giant mountains of clothing trash we've been having a problem with in the last decade or so

I guess its more for influencers who take lots of photos and cant repeat outfits

I could envision a near future where they finally nail AR glasses and businesses pop up where you buy clothing that shows up in AR. Like you sell clothing with qr codes on it that link up to a digital clothing brand and you can digitally wear the clothes irl. It's hard to explain lol

This concept is cool for a digital spin on high fashion, all the guests watch the models with VRs and such. But even that can be considered problematic because haute couture is quiet prominently about breaking through the challenges and limitations imposed by the materials, that's why it's a form of Art.

Oh my god. Okay so i work in quinceañera, and currently because of the pandemic there's been an uptick of people wanting those huge poofy ball gowns solely for photos. I can imagine using that for. The girls that only want to do a photoshoot and don't want/can't do the huge party. It would be so useful.

This is such a good comparison

😂😂 I feel like I’m seeing a glimpse into the future…

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/o3Ron7Cae6Fj1aM.html

This idea is great for special effects in movies!

@@chrisbailey7384 also they could make fashion shows/runaways with this kinda of stuff

@@chrisbailey7384 Cgi already exists though? Most movies have a separate team for it. A movie would literally never use this kind of app for its special effects and neither would a runway.

The AR-thing could be used as a virtual changing room to let you try before buying online, in fact that's been a thing for ages. The actual service seems more like a service for influensers and they already upload obviously doctored photos so I don't think quality is much of a concern there.

Yes omg I almost just made the same comment verbatim lol

if i’m spending $40 on clothes, they better be real lol

You’re paying 40 dollars for a photoshopped picture that YOU took. Ridiculous !!

i dont think this is the real intention tho. this looks to be targeted mainly at influences (and art fans) and if we can do anything to stop them from buying and throwing away so many clothes im a supporter. Also technically yes anyone can learn anything if they put the time and effort in but the reason we hire services and artisans is BECAUSE not everyone has the time or effort or desire to learn these skills. Also this isnt just photoshop, its 3d modelling, rigging, lighting, texturing, editing etc. another point is, a lot of these look more like art projects than meant to be anything practical. And sometimes art can just exist for the sake of being art. I get very frustatred when people shit on modern tech based art "not practical or sooo fake" because that's not the point of it? the point of it is to look cool and to push technology. (this is not including nfts tho lol those are dumb)

@@Heliocanix sure. But the photos are just poorly done. The shadows are way off in every pic. If I was an influencer I would not be pleased with the outcome

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/o3Ron7Cae6Fj1aM.html

*AISURU.TOKYO/TOKYO?[JK-osanpo]* *(◍•ᴗ•◍)✧*。18 *years and over* 🍎🍑 UKposts: This is fine Someone: Says "heck" UKposts: Be gone #однако #я #люблю #таких #рыбаков #Интересно #забавно #девушка #смешная #垃圾🎦

AISURU.TOKYO/shizumi 💞 (◍•ᴗ•◍)✧*18歳以上の場合🎦 UKposts: This is fine Someone: Says "heck" UKposts: Be gone #однако #я #люблю #таких #рыбаков #Интересно #забавно #девушка #смешная #垃圾

AISURU.TOKYO/shizumi 💞 (◍•ᴗ•◍)✧*18歳以上の場合🎦 UKposts: This is fine Someone: Says "heck" UKposts: Be gone #однако #я #люблю #таких #рыбаков #Интересно #забавно #девушка #смешная #垃圾

AISURU.TOKYO/shizumi 💞 (◍•ᴗ•◍)✧*18歳以上の場合🎦 UKposts: This is fine Someone: Says "heck" UKposts: Be gone #однако #я #люблю #таких #рыбаков #Интересно #забавно #девушка #смешная #垃圾

That's what I was thinking, it just doesn't make sense for the general public. Why pay $40 for a single photoshopped picture?

@@weatherboyderogatory5054 To be honest a lot of influencers have some photoshop experience, so they'd probably do a better job. Buying the assets normally would probably be cheaper.

Yeah!! I wouldn’t even say some, I’ve heard from a lot haha I have a photographer friend and she told me about one who just returns hundreds of outfits per month just to take photos

@@Stettafire Honestly, yeah, I think I agree.

YES great point!

I think it's the start of everyone wearing Distopian eye visors and actually wearing all grey but we exist as avatars to eachother

Digital fashion has many applications. We are creating digital samples to approve look before production and creating look books as digital campaigns and I believe that we all will be able to use more digital clothing in our day to day as we are expending so much time in digital worlds !!

Hey are u an army? Coz ur pfp is chimmy!!! 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜

Yeah, and in those cases their pool of clients would be very limited.

I know of a rising project that is doing just that.

Them in a board meeting “okay guys. We need to cut costs. Any ideas?” High guy in the back “OH OH OH! I know! Let’s sell the clothes, without actually giving them the clothes”

@@Tornmacaroon well, but you're not an influencer. There's people who buy tens of outfits every month that they never use again, i think for someone like that this would make sence (if the pivtures were more believable though, they all kind of looked photoshoped) Not every service has to be for everyone

@@pamelaguerra3768 Dude, you do realise how much NFTs and stuff pollute the environment, right? it's way worse then buying ten fashion items in a month. Plus the photoshop jobs on these is terrible and a lot of influences have a decent set of photoshop skills.

that would be cool

@Julieta Demi wait did you just copy and paste a comment or something because the one right under the one you replied to says the exact same thing

@@sivor20 lol yeah i’m confused

Yes! I think it's great that saf was willing to evidently step so far out of her comfort zone and have more skin exposed. She's gorgeous and I can't love her enough

Yeah ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qJx6dn2ciGqUp3k.html Fax

I was thinking the exact same thing.

Omg yes!

Deep cut.

Yes! Although I guess you're basically paying for a Photoshop job so, from that perspective, if it's well done, I'd say it's worth it if you're into fashion.

Yes, it definitely feels done by a machine with very mild tweaks rather than even a half way adequate graphic designer. The neck and arms were often particularly bad. With some work and extra customisation, the avant garde pieces could look really good

Yeah. It's very obvious that the sample pictures of them photoshopped onto models had a lot of care put into them. They probably employ a decent amount of photoshop artists to do this stuff, and $35 dollars to edit a picture is honestly crap pay(that's like friends and family price), so you're not gonna get even close to the kind of quality they have on the sale page. That definitely shows in the price of the items, as well. the $1000 dress was obviously done by someone much more skilled, while the long longsleeve edit was something I could have pulled off in like 20 minutes. Because of that, I feel it's a bit of false advertising in the state it's currently in, since most of the people looking to buy this stuff are obviously not going to know what's really required(work load/price/posing/etc) to pull this off at such a high level.

@@J_Lynn yeah, it’s a very bad rate, and that doesn’t even include the commission to the designer, who I presume gets a percentage, probably in the 20-30% range, I’m guessing, then the company takes their cut, THEN the retoucher gets paid. It’s possible they’re not even paying based on commission and could be outsourcing to a retouching house, which could be essentially an unregulated sweatshop depending on where it’s located.

I make little edits like this for my job, where I make mockups. I know how long this would take, and where corners were cut. This makes me think they have a full time design staff - no way else they would be able to charge this low. They likely have a 3d "person" template which they pose over the photo and then do some minor retouching. I bet the expensive one went to the lead designer.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/e2KEoKV8qnmgwHk.html

You said it exactly how I was thinking. It’s cool as a concept, but it’s also not worth it for people who aren’t rich and famous.

💯

Thank you! all I could think of with that $1000 dress was Ready Player One

100% agreed! Since I began sewing and making/upcycling clothes I've learned to appreciate the craftsmanship of garments, and this feels... somehow insulting? Especially since the Photoshop is sooo bad sometimes.

Sounds like a great business opportunity for you and others. Imagine what people would pay for high-quality photoshopped designer wear.

Honest to God if I'm not actually able to wear something I spend money on, designer or dollar store, I would blow a gasket, all 12 cylinders and my brains blood vessels because if I'm gonna not be able to fit something and argue with people on return shipping. I would still rather that than missing looking that way in real life because I want the REAL asset. Digital try on, ok kool, digital assessing/ Photoshop remixing for 30$ pluss? 🤷🏾‍♂️ As much as y'all paying for this and poopy shadows/ no actual blending in photo for INSTA?!?!?! Huhhhhhh..... Idk I'm lost, I'ma just join the Boomer club now lmao.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/o3Ron7Cae6Fj1aM.html

@Phoenix 𝙾𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝙼𝚢 PROFILE I truly don’t know enough about nfts besides the fact I find them confusing to understand so I can’t comment on that part

Or a plastic tablecloth.

and stick on some baloons

I laughed so hard! This made my day, thank you!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/pJmQbHmAe6yclJ8.html

It honestly just seems like a scam :/

@@rhianonmorris5367 yes exactly! Like the only way I feel like it would be a good deal is if it’s your job to take photos in strange clothes for clout.

@@Tornmacaroon safyia is our whale, trying the weird and impractical so we don’t have to

@@rhianonmorris5367 The frustrating thing about it is the prices, even like $30 for a digital outfit seems too much. How can they charge similar prices to real clothing that can be worn again and again?

Same here, especially seeing just how fake these looked in the video. She looked so cute but these look like worse version of that game covet

it’s 100% for rich influencers and people with a large social media platform! i wouldn’t benefit at all from this since i never post pictures of my full body anywhere 🤣

This caters to a very specific crowd. If you buy clothes solely to take pictures, I think this is a wonderful option to reduce waste. So what if people want to "hide online"? This doesn't affect you or me really, and it is better for the environment compared to fast fashion options. Its a really creative idea and I think including an estimate of how much water, and power could be saved buy purchasing one versus online would be a good impact and condition people to make better environmental choices when purchasing clothing. There isn't a single way to save the environment, and if this is genuinely more beneficial, why not? I am getting elitist vibes from this comment tbh which is ironic considering the people who would probably purchase these.

If they're paying the designers fairly then this seems like a good thing for digital artists and fashion designers whose work is usually undervalued. Otherwise, I agree with everything else.

It does feel like this company is actually encouraging waste rather than combatting it (regardless of their attempt to convince people otherwise). It's just a different kind of waste. It might even be encouraging people to adopt more of a single-use mentality when it comes to products and fashion by encouraging this "do it for the gram" mindset.

@@AkiraChan24 At this point this company isn't really encouraging it. It's already a thing. "Fast Fashion" has been a thing for decades now. People wearing something for a single "season" and then throwing it out because it is no longer "in style", no longer fashionable. I've personally never been in that crowd, I have clothes I've owned for 15 years, but it's a very real thing and causes a ton of waste. People have also been wearing things once or twice and then tossing it for years. Hell even that one can be said "for decades" to an extent. What is a wedding dress? An article of clothing meant to be worn once. Sure people usually keep them... but eventually that dress you wore a single time has to go somewhere? A thrift store? Most expensive wedding dresses are made to measurement and won't fit the average person going to a thrift shop and if you are buying a wedding dress at a thrift store chances are you aren't going to pay the high price of having a dress made of expensive fabric adjusted to be your size. Though sometimes these dress do go on to be bought by people who give it a second life as something other than a dress. Or if you're lucky and know someone who can adjust the dress for you that is family, buying a second hand wedding dress can be a very viable option. It's just not common that these dresses get bought. Prom dresses and highschool tuxedos land in this same area. Though at least these items are a little easier to find new homes for through second hand stores... but even then... most teenagers don't want to wear something used to their homecoming or prom. What about the amazing dresses and suits you see at red carpet events? How often do you see those items be worn again by those celebrities? What do you think happens to those? In a less "for the gram" kind of sense... there is also the tons of waste caused by people throwing out clothes because they don't know how to repair a damaged article of clothing or how to remove a deep stain. So they donate it.... and because it's damaged it gets tossed by the store... or they just throw it away themselves. Do I think digital fashion is dumb? Yes, absolutely. Do I think it could make an enviromental impact? Maybe. Do I think they are "encouraging" the fast fashion or single wear mindset? No. Because this mindset has been around long before instagram.