🤮

As always

he is among top 3-5 political spokespeople across any party today

He is Chona wala

मोदी अपने लिए वीडियो बनाने वालों को 2 लाख रुपए दे रहे हैं मोदी ने लोकतंत्र की हत्या कर दी

He'd Be Too Much For Them

Machar marne ke liye kamaan kew laye?

Ya log sirf dharm ke name pe hi debate kar sakta hai . Kam ke nae per koi debate nehi kar sakta Issliye india ka press index itna kharab hai😡😡

​@@RoniDattaChoudhurytu baat karna sandeshkhali me development ka

@@gyanibaba25 sale jail me chala gaya or bjp ke member jo wrestlers ke protest ke main waja tha o abhi bhi khula ghum raha hai or modi khula ghumkebhi manipur nehi jaraha. Kya andhbhakt hai be tera malik log case huya bolte hai but main jo culprits hai uska kya huya o nehi batata kya

Shezad and Ashutosh

@@bharatdave6288Ashutosh is 1st place from the bottom 😂 😂 😂

only lol 😅😅​@@elborrador333

@@elborrador333womp womp…

@@bharatdave6288 Andhabhakta...

He never said or implied this, but distortions are all too common these days. This is the consequence of the विकृति that Mr Savarkar's ideology has brought.

Ashutosh did say like this. While responding to a question he said, in earlier days Hindu Muslim riots even if Muslims killed or raped Hindus, nobody took names, but nowadays media is taking Muslim name. This means if Muslim rapes its ok. He is secular. But if media questions as to why did he rape, then they are communal. According to him even if Muslim does riots, he remains secular, but if media says he was the person who started riots, then media is communal. Understood now??​@@MrPeaceGuy54

​@@MrPeaceGuy54Savarkar is not विकृत, but the Nehru family labeling him as anti-national and British agent is विकृत. Savarkar was a Hindu, but did not believe in rituals. He faced Kala Pani for 50 years. But still Nehru demeaned him, because Nehru was a Muslim and Sawarkar strongly opposed Muslims, because they killed Hindus. Therefore Nehru family is विकृत and not Sawarkar.

@@ajitnadgouda6079 That was equally applicable. The media usually used to say that there was violence between two communities, which was done to ensure that people unnecessarily did not develop prejudices towards someone. However, nowadays, the media is quite keen to take the name of some people. You can check how a reputable news agency like ANI shared fake news in its hurry to take the name of a particular person, and the same is true for media outlets like OpIndia. None of this implies that someone doing evil is secular or that they should not be questioned. However, their identity is not one-sided.

@@ajitnadgouda6079 No, he did not spend 50 years in prison. He was released and confined to Ratnagiri. I do agree that he was once Veer, but the man who came out of prison (do keep in mind that he deliberately chose the path of violence, and there were others who chose to remain instead of writing six mercy petitions) had been corrupted morally and intellectually. His idea of a Hindu is almost entirely political. As an atheist, he obviously found little value in spirituality. All he did was to conveniently link nationality with a particular religion and then claim that there was another nation that had to be compelled to live in the same territory. Dr Ambedkar rightly called his position "illogical" and "dangerous" for the safety and security of India ('Pakistan, or, The Partition of India'). Mr Savarkar's divisive ideology contributed to the partition of India. While he was busy doing things like conspiring to assassinate the Mahatma, asking the Hindus to help the British during the second World War to crush the Quit India movement, people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru were in prison. Both of them willingly gave up lives of comfort and luxury. Mahatma Gandhi risked his own life to save people in Noakhali and Calcutta, and Pandit Nehru did the same in Delhi. However, Mr Savarkar was not there. Mr Savarkar's ideology will cause unimaginable damage to both Bharat and Sanatana Dharma. While people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru fought for the Vedāntic pluralism of Swami Vivekananda, Mr Savarkar did everything he could to undo it. Sadly, our so-called liberal opposition parties have reduced people like Pandit Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi to mere statues. Their ideas have been neglected in favour of appeasement, corruption, and an unending thirst for power. Mrs Gandhi started all of this, and the rot has not been fixed yet. Nevertheless, it remains my conviction that Mr Savarkar is India's (and Hinduism's) most dangerous विकृति. If we don't wake up, then we will pay a heavy price (if people openly praising Mr Godse, a centuries-old place of worship being demolished in Delhi, young children being encouraged to say hateful things, an RPF constable specifically targeting some people, some immoral individuals being garlanded, and a man in Haridwar openly calling for harming others not being punished for years is not enough). This does not mean that we can ignore the other side. Abrahamic religions do need reforms. But we will not do anything meaningful by becoming what we once opposed. Kabir, Maulana Madani (whose descendant recently spoke about the unity of Allah and Om), Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Raskhan, and Maulana Azad also existed. May you have a good day!

Godi media ki kamai ki tareef karo Jhuth bolke paisa banata hai.

​@@ratanbhattacharjee7233kaunsa jhoot?

@@ratanbhattacharjee7233tereko G maartha hai raat ko abdul

​@@ratanbhattacharjee7233bro you are ostrich 😂😂😂

Shehzad was good in first part. But I think it would have been better to come up with stats to show it is actually secularism is flourishing in India.

Joke. They are minority by choice. They chose partition. They chose to be jihadis where more. They chose to leave. Noone pushed them out. Just having Muslims in every seat is not secularism We want meritocracy. We want equality, no appeasement. Only meritocracy should rule. Hindus are forced to celebrate all festivals. Do muskims celebrate diwali,holi? Thats secularism. Do muslims say they are Indians first? No. Do muskims respect idols? Hindus say Allah. Will they say bhagwan? Noone can claim any rights on basis of religion. That is secularism. Has anyone heard Owaissi ask hindu voters right of his constituency. He only talks of muslims Muslims. Thats communal. He is communal. No hindu demands rights for being hindu

Perfectly said

India has been designated as the most dangerous place for Christian’s with the mass slaughter of Christians in manipur. Don’t forget how Sikhs are labeled khalistanis

According to Indian constitution, Buddhism, Sikh and Jainism are considered Hindu already.

Par buddhist aur jain to hindu hai na

He was the easiest of the lot. All of his points could be proven wrong by simple facts and concepts. He never seemed competent to hold up on his arguments even for a minute

We ashamed as a bengali

Bjp should be ashamed for what they are doing in Manipur

@@shubhankarhalder9044 you should be ashamed for Manipur

What tmc is doing bjp anti bengali party doing nothing drama

National spokesperson of bjp

@@fuse8354 THANKS we appreciate his clear and frank account

He is choona wala

He has brains

A Stooge

​@@manzoorahmadlone6552behead him or what???

@@faultlines3399 54 year old Mohammed rap^d 6 year old Ayesha #exmuslim sahil youtube Chanel

@@faultlines3399 6 saal ki bachchi se 🤡🤡🤡 #exmuslim sahil

@@faultlines3399what hard evidence you have that God actually spoke to Muhammad? 😂 flying donkey?

​@@faultlines3399 ?

@@faultlines3399 hinduism precedes ram by thousands of years. pisslam started with popat

#FreeHinduTemples

👍👏🏼👏🏼💐‼️

Which party is saying that? Bro its 2024 not 1947.

@@imanand11Are you uneducated… Go and at least do a simple google search, it was said by our ex-prime minister Mr. Manmohan Singh..

@@Karthikeyansundar-rl5ym I dont edorse quota in religion and caste... The current form of Wuota itself is injustice.

What About So called RSS which is terrorist organisation!!!

What about your so called RSS that is terrorist organisation ...

Thanks Sure,🙏🙇 Fir your Super Comment. 🙏🙏 ❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩" OUR NATION'S DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY, IS OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST PRIORITY, FIR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY. 🙏🙏❤🇮🇳🇮🇳" OUR NATION FIRST☝

I agree.

I agree

Temple money Temple gold is nations wealth. Taken by govt. Used for all citizens. But masjid money is not for all. Which govt has touched it. Which govt has taken money from masjids? How much money comes from church? How much money comes from gurdwara?

​@@induchopra3014 to church or masjid ko kyu de rahe hai 😡🤬😠 baap ka maal hai

He is always logical

Utopian genre of secularism goinn on..still some complaining about it

C🎉🎉perfect

Their only reply will be Brahmin patriarchy or Andhbhakt and running away. No Liberandu will have answers to your slapping questions.

Did u ever see PM inaugurate mosque or church, but he did for ram madir , so securlism don't apply there

​@@unknown00808 I don't know... Is a non Muslim allowed to inaugurate a mosque? (Curious. Not trying to prove a point.)

LeLis can't debate, they can only say Andhbhakt when someone calls them out and feel proud of their stupidity.

Truly 💯

We don't need this we have our bengali nationalism

​@@gauravdey4163😂

Then Brother say Abki bar 400 par 😊🔥

Bengal = Bhikaris

There's one more state in the South.

@@atokimruk937 up bihar cow belts is bimaru bikhari producing population

@@gauravdey4163 did Momtaz bano kept her ROZA today?

​@@gauravdey4163look at the U.P where bjp is ruling specialy the great monk...and Bihar is not a cow belt it is totally controlled by lallua corrupt and mullas

My dirty mind thoughts about 57 Muslim countries and their secularism 🤣🤣🤣

I thought it was the constitution of India..

​@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usDo you know the history of constitution? You think Muslims were allowed in India after partition because of constitution?You think Pakistan was formed because of constitution? Are you delusional?

@@funfactz5605 Bro chill..I was just talking about this debate..

​@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usconvert detected opinion rejected!

ticket chahiye 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Shehla Rashid? Read her tweets on Mother Sita and Lord Rama! It is beyond disgusting comments that she made. Now for political ambitions she is acting secular! The snake!

I'm totally agree with you 👍

​@@sumantkumar7079Haan, de

He is extremely prejudiced and always on an one way street and this speaks volumes for his cussed attitude and we can hardly call him a political analyst.

There are crores of such people😂😂

😂😂

Even Delhi mayor Kejriwal couldn't stand Ashutosh, kicked him out of AAP😂😂

@@chanakyabharat756 Spot on. Those who are sleeping need to be woken up. They most likely suffer from inferiority mindset. They will never answer: If Hindus are no more a majority, will India still be secular??? They need to answer: There are 57 muslim countries that follow Islamic laws, there is 1 country for Jews, there are 117 countries that lean Christian. Hindus have NONE. Why????

They won’t , because they cannot face truth, the bitter truth. The film Kerala story and Kashmir files threw some light on the peaceful community activities in these states. 3 or 300 doesn’t make much difference ,when innocents become victims of treachery . Only the parents of victim dies , but for the doers it is Jihad in the name of religion. Shama Muhammed though being from Kerala fails to see eye to eye , because religion comes first for them and not innocent girls cheated and thrown into gutter.

What is secularism? Will u please define?😂

If secularism is dying it’s only because the tolerant are tired of appeasement of the intolerants.

​@@atulkumar-pr4yosecularism is majority ko chutiya bnao

Sahi kaha bhai, Rahul doesn't seem to be very happy with the result. 😂😂

👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏

why

Why not

@@k45rt789jh he should answer first as he wants to remove something that is already included in constitution. So.. why remove the word secularism? You want the nation to include only one religion?

@@ashishdhiwar6226 'secular' term was not present in Original Constitution. It was added during Emergency by 42nd CAA. Similar is the word "socialist'. These are token terms for appeasement, nothing else. If you read Fundamental Rights, DPSPs - you will realize our Constitution already has the essence of being secular and socialist. Also, Originally, certain segments of Constitutional provisions were meant for that purpose -- that too socialist tendencies were in DPSPs, left to govt to implement when appropriate. Forcefully putting them in Preamble is a desperate vote catching attempt. The illusion these terms have created is astounding. Numerous Religion-specific laws have been created and their existence justified by holding these terms to ransom. Wakf Act, Places of Worship Act, Muslim Personal Law and so on. Today distortion has exceeded so much that 'secularism' is loosely translated as of Muslim nature, due to un-counted appeasements.

​@@raghvendrasingh9675 *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.* *Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan* *Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.* *Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.* *There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.* *No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.* *All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.* *All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.* *Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.* *Follow only Science and Humanism.* *Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.* *"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."* *-Christopher Hitchens* *"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."* *-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism* *Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram* *These poor people, who are so fond of religion, they don't understand that it's the religion, the very religion they're defending, it's that religion that kills people.* *All Humanists are friends of all humanists. Sanatani, Sikh, Christian, Musalman these all are hoax. All these religions and religious identities are fabricated. Find the human in you, and in the other person, even if it's Kaffir or Musalman.* *Leave Religion, accept Humanism. Don't be a Musalman, be a Human.*

Sai ok but Ranganath is bluff

Why shoot a brahmastra on a sparrow?

Captains for the finals😅

​@@chanakyabharat756 How is he a bluff, please elaborate...🤔🤔

Godse was a terrorist. This is known to Everyone, nothing new.

Yupp he would have raised the bar of this debate really highh

It's not about good or bad debaters when you don't have anything truth to say.

Exactly

Yes 💪✊😌🥰🇮🇳✊❤️🕉️

That is very secular