Honestly this problem can simply fixed by a toggle to turn on/off the fast charging, which is already there in samsung, but samsung doesn't have crazy fast charging, i don't know about other phone manufacturer. You don't need to fast charge every time, but its still great feature to use when you forget to charge, and you're in hurry

@@hid4 still charging is charging

@@0SIGMA yes, and?

@@hid4 and less charging cycle result to better overall battery health

@@0SIGMA true

No USB C no sale

@@RobertK1993 You right usb c more inportant than having almost 4 hours more screen on time😂😂

IPhone 13 pros A15

The A15 bionic on IPhone is soo powerfull tht the Phone cant maintain its peak performance so its Useless cos u barely touch its peak performance

With less screen resolution, anyone can win a test

"who cares about fast charging if you charge overnight?" To not let it overcharge, it's healthier to charge ur phone to 80 90 percent not to 100 so u can just leave ur phone not charging overnight and just charge it in the morning for 20 30 mins and get enough battery, and besides, it's not bad at all to have especially if the phone is preventing overheating very well

@@speedypopoff its safe to overcharge nowdays

@@arbernuka3679 yes but that's not what he said

@@speedypopoff iPhones wait at 80% overnight an are finished charging when you get up.

@@speedypopoff iPhones have a optimized charging option you know

Well even in Oneplus it goes with your alarm. It charge to 80% and then continue when the alarm is getting closer. By this the battery wont overcharge. Also it has 2 separate batteries so the power wont degrade the battery as fast as charging one cell with such a power.

OnePlus has a feature where if you set an alarm and put it to charge overnight will slowly charge. It'll finish charging to 100% when the alarm goes off so that saves the battery from degrading as fast. 65w isn't always the same whether you charge overnight or during the day, many people don't know this and start crying about it

@@bAssisTowo yeah the iphone 13 pro max has the same except it has to learn when you normally stop charging. Not sure how well it works yet

I don't

That's so mediocre, according to which study do most people charge at night? When I go out of my house at around 1 pm my battery is around 60-70% I prefer to leave with 100% and with real fast charging I can get it in 15 minutesm with apple it takes two hours to fully charge

2 days on 80% is impossible. More like 1 day and some leftovers

@@defnotatroll it can. I’ve been using my phone for For over 16 hours and I have 50%. I’m about to go to sleep and I bet It can last me all day tmrw

it is NOT the charging speed that dmg the battery, but the heat generated. you just need to keep the phone cool while charging, no matter how slow or fast

@@justaguyfromreddit The fast charging speed is heating up the battery so it is the charging speed

@@defnotatroll It is absolutely possible. On lightweight use you can go up to 2 days

👍👍

Your battery pack heat the battery and only refill 30% of 13pm's battery

that just shows you how much Apple is better lol

@@ArthArmani don’t say that, you’ll trigger the android fans

Samsung screen has at least 1 million pixels more to push , also larger screen area. Old galaxy s6 has more screen resolution than current iphone.

Yes

Yep, with that battery life charging it overnight is what someone would do so it’s ok

You're best kind of right

@@tech_glide iphone 12 pro max beat the s21 wdym waiting for s22🤣

@@tech_glide lol then iphone 14 coming lol.

@@tech_glide never saw such a fanboy xD

@@exkinggameplay8433 samsung galaxy s21 ultra better camera than iphone 12 pro max and 13 pro max

@@mateuszkalkowski4264 The fact that you can zoom 100x times it doesn’t mean the camera is better. ProRes, Dolby Vision HDR, much better stabilization camera and video quality.

Yeah I’ve got to order one of those, you’re using oem usb c to lightning cable or another brand?

@@marceljohnson2215 yeah using jsaux usb-c to lightning and it does not even heat up one bit unlike my oneplus 7t pro and lg velvet 5g, both of them charge up only a little bit faster, but with a lot more wear on the battery and sometimes even makes the phones hot

Nope, fast charging and good battery like OnePlus is better, while you take a bath the phone is completely charged and this is insane

@@joaoduarte12 the iphone has a 2 day battery. in 48 hours you will find time to charge it easily. iphone is huge winnner here

its recommended also to buy anker chargers, but apple please get type C

Best thing to do is keep it between 20 and 80 your battery Wil last at least 3 times as long. So cycling as much doesn't really matter.

By that logic every Tesla would be literal problem waste by now.

你说的有一定道理，但是实际情况并不会有那么严重。在中国像oneplus的充电技术已经落后了，最新的120瓦充电技术在15-18分钟就可以充满，他们一般是采用2块电池类似于并联，并且里面有很多连接点，它们叫做"多级耳"的技术来解决充电速度问题，而且发热量很低。有一部分中国人已经习惯了出门带充电器，而不是带充电宝的行为。因为在中国大部分地方都可以可轻松接到交流电的，比如去咖啡厅，餐厅，甚至买一杯奶茶，冲10多分钟20分钟就解决了用电焦虑的情况。苹果和oneplus采用的是完全不同的策略，他们的策略都很值得尊重。苹果想尽办法优化，尽量省电，oneplus尽可能省电的情况下让充电速度提升很大。都是为了让人们更方便的技术，没有对错，只需要选择适合自己的使用场景即可。要知道，像苹果这么强势要求供应链的企业全世界来看并不多，就算是索尼又如何，自己制作屏幕的三星又如何，都无法满足所有供应链产品是最优化解决方案。反过来说电池寿命，我自己是oppo用户，使用的find x3 pro（和oneplus 9pro属于姐妹机，oppo是oneplus的母公司）身边还有使用小米 vivo 华为等品牌手机的朋友，他们的手机最慢的也是有45瓦充电性能的，这种充电性能的手机其实在中国大陆已经非常普遍，甚至45瓦已经是淘汰技术，他们的手机电池寿命并没有明显下降，有的甚至已经用了2年多。而且在中国更换一块官方正品电池，不会影响售后质保的，只需要129人民币，也就是20美金。绝大部分手机2年之内电池寿命不会降低到百分之80，所以在一个手机正常使用寿命的情况下，基本只有1次更换电池的可能，付出的成本并不是很高。在中国人们更换手机的频率基本在2-3年，如果是我这样的电子产品发烧友，我可能一年更换1-3不手机。所以电池寿命我个人认为已经不在考虑范围之内了，因为他的更换成本很低。

If your battery lasts a day you can just charge it overnight. Ez

@@nekogaming8461 我个人已经没有晚上充电的习惯了，因为车里，工作地点，家里到处都有快速充电器，所以目前已经没有晚上充满电的习惯，更何况0-100只需要15-30分钟就可以充满，所以就没必要太纠结电池剩余电量了。更何况极少情况下会出现用到0在充电的情况，基本都是百分之30-50就充电了，此时的充电时间一般只有10-20分钟就可以充满。在充电速度方面苹果确实太过于保守，更先进的充电技术其实已经有了，并且有很多种方案还很成熟，不知道为什么他一直没有使用。

otherwise you can buy a power bank for around 30€

I suggest you to buy a power bank !!!!!!

@@sanjoysamanta4277 but what if he forgot or loses it it’s better to have a iPhone.

@@iamtheone2292 there is always exception everywhere in this world, but you can't drag in this as a logic

@@iamtheone2292 what if he forgot or lost jus iphone, it’s better to have a compass

I don't think they are afraid to show . And talking about charging speed , it doesn't harm battery life that much that's why they are doing it . Plus they know most people change phones after 2 to 3 years .

@@abhaymhatre8534 "doesn't harm the battery that much"? How do you know this? Even charging at 18w after 2yrs on iPhones which show their health % avg about 80-85%. Now that's 15-20% reduced capacity which I or anyone else would notice. Most other companies don't want to share that sort of information. They would rather their users keep ignorantly "Warp" or "Super Vooc" charging away their batteries. It's all a gimic and Apple keeps out selling them all. Btw I own both a Samsung and iPhone, but will be trading away the Samsung soon.

@@seekerj1643 battery health on iPhone is not reliable

@@alexandregouge6075 as compared to what though? Anecdotally everyone says that it drops after every new update but Apple has already said that the battery recalibration is done at that point in time. I can choose to believe them or not but atleast they show you something vs these other companies that won't even give you that. They would rather you be confounded by how less usage you are getting over time.

@@seekerj1643 there is a ytb channel that made a video about that

Agreed👍

Agreed as well, had iPhone 7 Plus until two weeks ago as well and trust me haha the upgrade to 13 pro is just insane in battery life literally still at 90% right now after using it for one hour and having it unplugged for 4

This is true, one of my friends is still using an iPhone SE to this day and gets a good battery life with his daily usage.

Agree, I have my Xperia XZ Premium since 2017 and even though the charging is slow (takes almost two hours) the battery health is still at 92% which is incredible

so much ignorance. It is NOT the charging speed that's damage the battery. But the heat generated in the process. That's mean that if you keep your phone cool even at 300watt you WON'T damage the battery more than using a 1 watt charger. If ever, the opposite

I agree with this, also if you only charge to 50% while the others are fully charged, that is still the same usability. Not to mention the chemical based battery is decrease the max capacity based on the amount of heat, so if you do the same test after 2 years, the different is even bigger. Which is pretty sad if you still don't want to spend another $1000 to buy a new one.

Agree

i think its very debatable to prefer either fast charging or longevity. I am a sucker for fast charging because its very convenient in situations of hurry, like topping up just before going to the office. Maybe because i am not a heavy user therefore i am able to make it through the day with around 10-15% with my oneplus 9. But its impressive to see what apple is able to do through their software optimization to prolong battery life and i think it very evident in real usage. But speaking of battery health i am very doubtful of that because i had to change my iphone 7 battery twice from apple service centres and boy they aren't cheap. After that experience i shifted to android starting with my oneplus 5t which had amazing battery life, coupled with fast charging was a cherry on top. I just had to charge just before to office and easily end up with more 25%. All i am trying to say is to have a balance between fast charging and battery life. I had my eyes on the iphone 11 but the transition from 7 to 11pro wasnt drastic in terms of experience except ofcourse the cameras whereas it was tangible from onplus 5t to 9. I am saying this because my parents own iphone 11 pros. I am not trying to degrade any company here, i mean come on, apple is a trillion dollar company for a reason, but i rather look through the hype. Well this was my personal experience. Apple still creates amazing products but its time to get more innovative.

@@sandystrom7569 agree, needs to be more innovative, asap.

Not to mention these superfast fast chargers do degrade the battery quicker. Batteryuniversity did a study on this. Basically, if you want to increase the lifespan of your battery you should avoid those superfast fast chargers.

Did you have a hard time getting one the new iPhone 13’’s? Are some of the models out of stock? I plan to upgrade to the iPhone 13 Pro Max, once my 2 year iphone contract ends this November.

@@bretttanton328 what carrier do you use

@@hazadoor my phone carrier is Thumb Cellular. When I get the iPhone 13 Pro Max, I’ll switch to Verizon. Maybe T-Mobile

@@bretttanton328 nice what phone u got currently. Also i dont reccomend tmobile as i have it. Also atat is giving 800 dollars trade in if i give my samsung s10. They are giving really high numbers for trade in. I recommend u see how much u can get

@@hazadoor I have an iPhone XR. It’s trade in value is $230. Why don’t you recommend T-Mobile?

It’s a beast, best decision every buying it

Most people who say that rarely ever think about practical, real world scenarios. Electricity is everywhere, only TIME is limited. I never, ever had a problem with not being able to find a power outlet. But I've had problem with not having time to charge. Say, you have an iPhone at 10% left, and your friend asks you to join a mobile gaming session with them, do you: A. Tell them to wait TWO FUCKING HOURS, or B. Charge as you play and degrade the battery 10 times as fast? Because with the fast charging, by the time everybody joined the match, you'd probably at 80% by then. This goes on for when you need to leave the house urgently, or...basically any scenarios where you don't have time to wait for something to charge. It's easy to lay on bed and think "oh longer battery is better because less charging" when you don't have a life. People who have shit to do, will pay any price for every single second they can save. Also, let's do some maths. iPhone: 2 hours charging, 12 hours of use. OnePlus: 30 minutes charging, 7 hours of use. You do the math. Imagine how much time you'd save.

@@dxkhoi I agree with u

@@dxkhoi also this wasn’t a fair comparison.the Samsung’s display was set to the max brightness while the iPhone had the lowest brightness of the bunch(lower power consumption) At 4:40 he said that iPhone decreased the brightness due to the benchmark test but u can notice that the iphones brightness is lower than the bunch from the very beginning

@@dxkhoi just charge overnight lol

more like 3 loooool

Every charge cycle ages the battery. If I have to charge a battery twice as often, it also breaks down twice as fast. And with a 30 watt power supply, the iPhone charges much faster. So no advantage for the OnePlus.

@@holgerwinkler9278 Sadly you won't change his mind. He thinks it's a gift that OnePlus is handing out but they will never be as bold as Apple to share the battery health % They'll only continue to crank up the watts every new model year. Unless he's planning on buying a new OnePlus every year he better get used to carrying about that charger with him.

@@holgerwinkler9278 so much ignorance. It is NOT the charging speed that's damage the battery. But the heat generated in the process. That's mean that if you keep your phone cool even at 300watt you WON'T damage the battery more than using a 1 watt charger. If ever, the opposite

@@holgerwinkler9278 The IPhone 13 phones have been proven to not charge faster at 30 watts. Apple throttles the battery so no matter what wattage you use, the system will adjust and still slow down the process. Probably why Apple never advertised the fast charging speed capabilities. It simply does not matter with their phones. Also modern fast charging batteries are split in half so that neither cell can charge at as high a temperature. So 65 watt charging will be cut to 33/32 watts on either side. Now at 120-125 watts, I think there can be real issues later on. We'll see though.

@@holgerwinkler9278 you know that you can charge a phone which can support a 120W with just 10W if you want to. It's kinda good to have that option if you need it imo

Yea

9hrs is more than enough if u dont play games i dont know why some fanbois are so angry and so happy about these fanbois are toxic bruh 😂

Ikr I can't wait till Sammy does a 4k panel

No 4k. Only works on video rest is 1080p

@@abhiabzz7564 no. The 4k on the sony cannot be scaled down to 1080p or any other quality.

@@abhiabzz7564 watch the reviews of it

Sony is the most powerful and fast. The battery doesn't matter so much to me, especially since it's not at all weak.

And idiot people say "suck battery iphone"

Even mini has better battery life 😁

Almost 2x more pixels than iphone. That is difference.

Iphone Mini doesn't have a 4k display.

@@artdogg50 full HD plus

Its prtically 1080p 4k works on 4k videos

@@abhiabzz7564 It downscales to 1096p, not upscale to 4K. Even if an app runs at 1096p, all the 6,5 million pixels are working. Screens do not change resolution, can only limit apps to HD or Full. Like watching Full HD movie on 4K screen. Otherwise, 1iii would use similar amount of power compared to 5iii. And it does not happen.

It is not fully 4k. but has 37% more pixel than s21 ultra, although the screen area is significantly smaller than s21 ultra, means less battery usage.

@@OmarSS87 Pixel count is the matter of rendering that pixel not displaying it in terms of the battery usage. So, if you have a 4k display, but the content is rendered in 1080p, the battery usage is lower than another display rendering that content in 1440p. Upscaling is not taxing that much on the graphics if it doesn't improve the quality of the contenty when upscaling it.

Yes

its the samsung software fault, they can't optimize their software, apple optimization with hardware & software is amazing

Yes, if they stop using QHD screen. The main difference. S21+ would perform better here.

@@OmarSS87 nah bro. QHD doesn't make a 3 hour difference to battery life

The Snapdragon 888 has proven to be a huge battery hog with a tendency to overheat. Qualcomm will probably have a new chip out before the end of the year.

@@archie7288 It is because of most hi end android phone has 10W TDP chipset. Only Huawei and Apple has 6W TDP chipset.

Low power mode just makes the screen darker and turns off your iPhone when you’re not using it. Not really much

@@masternoobjunior3486 and it turns it to 60hz since that probably help the battery alot

@@masternoobjunior3486 It does so much more. It scales screen down to 60Hz, power throttles the CPU and shuts down the Avalanche cores, limits the GPU to 3W power draw, turns off background app refresh and reduces screen animations.

2 3 days damn, do u just use it to chat and call ppl

@@speedypopoff I could get 48 hours on a charge. That's browsing internet and watching videos and twitch.

@@mimperial1982 oh that’s great performance

@@mimperial1982 Amazing

nope it does ot make ay difference

Doesn't matter, Apple just throttles it more to slow down the process.

@@artdogg50 no. It does make a difference. The pro max charges at 27 watts. There’s multiple other videos showing the difference

yup, so true...

That's why Iphone 13 Pro Max can be charged with 27 watts and beats S21 Ultra's 25 watts of charging and Iphone 13 Pro Max doesen't even heat!

Modern batteries are split into 2 separate modems, which takes a lot of the strain off. Of course 120 watt chargers probably lose that advantage.

they debunked it, it won't work

That's been proven to not happen. Apple throttles the battery making it incapable of charging faster no matter what.

exactly, and the real metric should really be time of charge / hour of battery life in order to normalize the data.

@@jimmysyar889 yeah

Just got it. You will LOVE it!

Exactly. There’s a direct relationship between current into and out of a lithium battery and degradation of the battery compounds. Fast charging or discharging is hard on batteries. So is charging them to 100% (which is why electric vehicles never charge to 100% and the battery is larger than the usable capacity). Charging at higher current when they battery is almost fully charged is also much worse than when it’s discharged. Bottom line: Companies claiming they can fast charge without degrading the battery are lying. They can’t change the laws of physics.

Who cares ? Most people change their phone every 2-3 years, it will easily last that time...Wont be good in 5+ years but who cares all your data will be backup anyways it will just be old hardware either way.

@@CaptainLettuce when you are paying 1000’s of dollars for a phone you should care. You must be an android user because they would only talk like this

@@byronbarnett1340 Actually I use both, I'm a developer. So I have most android devices to come out in the last 5 years and all iPhones from the last 5y because i have to test my software. You assume a lot and also write in a very ignorant and dismissive manner. The turth is statistically people will change their phone every 2-3 years, as the majority of people have 2 years contracts, some change straight away others wait a bit. Not to mention that quick charge doesn't damage the battery, heat damages the battery. Plus there is software on everry phone that restricts the charging power when the phone gets above a certain %. So from a utility prespective atleast for myself, havng fast charge is better. Even if all the software fails and reduces my battery life, the upside of having unlimited battery, by charging it for 20m every couple of hours..still feels better for me. Now thats not for every one, some prefer the longer battery and thats fine. Each to their own. However, maybe dont assume shit all the time like who is or isn't an android user and dont assume that you understand some one just becaue of their prefered phone operating system. LIke assuming that only android users will talk in a certain way or that just because something charges fast it will automatically generate heat...The oneplus runs pretty cool.

Full HD vs QHD. 30% resolution difference at least.

@@OmarSS87 yeah but iphone is the middle of full hd and Qhd+ see the resolution

The Moto G Power matches it, Pro Max is the flagship king though

@@BC08 Are you seriously comparing a SD665 phone to the A15 beast?

@@chrisak49 No, hence my comment that Pro Max is the flagship king.

@@BC08 it has a 14% bigger battery and slightly smaller screen,only 1080p LCD display which isn’t worth it at all

@@BC08 that’s a phone where the only selling point is the battery and the price. The camera is shit, the processor is shit, the screen is a dim, lower res, lower refresh rate LCD panel. Not even remotely comparable to a flagship phone experience.

He actually tested it. Where have you been? He has 3 great videos about iPhone 13

@@samuelmanny6231 where have you been ? i said S21 ultra vs iphone 13 pro max. read the sentence (facepalm)

Probably waiting for the pixel 6 to do a flagship battery life test

Yes. I always buy apple for the CPU, I wish you could do more though with the chip it's so powerful but limited by software imagine something like Dex on a A series chip, second they need to work on the thermals the performance is high even after thermal throttling but if they could sustain it that would be sweet. I am Glad they are back to Qualcomm modems it makes a huge difference in Cellular connectivity.

@@thetechlibrarian These chips are used on the upcoming Macs so Apple does do more, though their business model is horizontal integration, rather then hybrid. That will never change as it works for most users. I like having an iPad, iPhone and MacBook and do not want cross pollination.

Sony's 4K screen is probably a big factor here. Not sure if it was tested on 4K or 1080p, but even with 1080p those extra pixels with their own OLEDs would still end up drawing more power I guess.

I think the adaptive display is what trumps here and the proper solution to use 120 hz and 4k. The iphone trumps here because it's constantly switching the refresh rate, the lower resolution also helps (Plus optimization). Samsung could have a really similar experience but the haven't improved the adaptive resolution, very rarely lowers from 120 even when the phone doesn't needs it. Maybe the other companies will improve this in the future but they mostly focus on new features instead of improving existing ones.

@@C3lloman it's 4k all the time

Exactly! Unfortunately Xperia used to have excellent battery life, since Android 11 battery has been terrible across the range

finally back in track Sony... just missing battery life 🙁 i have been using xperia 1 iii just over a month not loving how fast the battery drains.

@@tt-px9xw Exactly. Xperia 5 here battery life turned to a disaster since android 11. Sony should really address this. Used to have best stand by time.

@@xperiaz8557 5 series are by far the best in terms of features and battery life. well balanced. i just couldnt wait for 5 iii.

Take a 30 Watt power supply for the iPhone.

Dont get this test, the 13 pro max charges 50% in 30 min on other tests,?

To me it's about even if you factor in both sides of the scale. Most are saying they simply charge at night, which proves or disproves nothing. I'm not trying to wait 2 hours for my phone to fully charge if I can help it.

@@artdogg50 charge for 30 mins and got all day battery. And slow charging is good for batteryhealth

I rarely see Sony phones. I see people mostly use iPhones

Not the battery, but software I guess

S21 take 1 hour to chage and iphone 13 2 hour it means s21 70% better

No it is not. Chemistry. Faster charging accelerate chemicals reactions inside battery and make degradation faster. Nothing changes as long batteries use Lithium.

@@OmarSS87 We used to have 5w charging, and battery degradation is pretty much the same compared to now. Just increasing charging power is not an innovation, Increasing power while using new technology to keep battery longevity at the same level is, if not better. The heat affects the reaction speed way more than the charging speed, and there are already tons of technology to reduce it. Otherwise, those 120W charging phones will simply burst into flame.

@@oMega-sm1eg I am using 12 pro max for 10 months and I use 5 watts charger from my Xr, until now I have 99% battery health.

@@dlanodnoco2197 Apple's battery health percentage is extremely unreliable. The precise way of measuring battery health percentage is by a third-party charging monitor(Oops Apple does not allow that) like Accubattery, or by an external current sensor to record a few full charging cycles.

theres nothing wrong with the iphone charging, its completely normal for it to take around 2 hours and 15 minutes (yes i know the iphone charged in 2 hours and 8 minutes but average should be 2 hours and 15 minutes from what i know)

@@Light-ct9ot normal it gets over 50% in 30 mins, it slows down to protect the battery from 80% i think its the cables or the chargers.

Yeh and with 4300 mah =))

Vdd 🤣🤣