that is nokia Symbian phone

Unneeded Over Processing

I love the nostalgia of the Nokia 808 but the results are dark and "solid" looking (meaning lack of detail). The iPhone has different processing but it does have an arguably better sensor than the old 808.

Comparison of heavily edited and lightly edited photos by a button-pressing photographer. In low light he didn't know how to configure the Nokia.

Respect. Nokia's color science is a total pureview ❤️

not quite enough in these days, everybody shows their best camera system

is that windows phone?

thats must be yours Secondary Phone...

I m missing lumia , i want to get one but cannot find now 😢

Sí, la calidad de la imagen y la temperatura del color en el NOKIA 808 son siniguales!

They can, but is not what social media is into. That's why these new phones have RAW capabilities, for people really interested in photography.

@@jorgeescudero5034 it's not quite the same as having it output a JPG straight up. And many phones still include some of the processing in the raw output.

​@@RennieAsh that's very bad.

Imagine what the modern Nokia 808 would do today.

Even though I like natural colours and sharpness, I think the default values on the Nokia 808 are just too muted and conservative. On mine I bump up saturation by +1 and sharpness by +2 and the results are much more to my liking.

It's not crazy. It's the incredible difference it had back then in sensor size.

Same tech in 1020 mostly...I think the iPhone would beat it in lower lit shots without a tripod

my only issue is night time mode is there any updates on that regard

what is better for camera 1020 or 950xl? or 950

There is no RAW in the Nokia 808.

Ip is oversharpening

@@culacgiontan7680 perhaps due to the masses love already enhanced photos albeit of the purity concept that should be considered here. People nowadays love oversaturated and over-sharpened photos as they look popping on the screen. Can’t blame them though.

@@kosztaz87 noted.

@@kosztaz87 ok, then bring lumia 1020 against iPhone 14.

The Lumia will win on distortion (it hasn't), corner sharpness, flare, and most noticable: macro. The fake bokeh output of the 13mm lens on the 14 Pro Max for macro is obnoxious.

@@lovemadeinjapan ? That's probably just an effect of changing the focus to be that close. At minimal distance You get a small area of focus right in the middle and around it blurs fast. I had one of those lumias once and wasn't as impressed as I was hoping

@@RennieAsh The iPhone makes a macro shot with a 13mm equivalent lens, that has a very deep sharpness depth, not blurring the background like a normal macro lens would do. So they apply an effect to achieve something similar. The 950XL makes the shot with the 26mm lens, and the natural sharpness depth is rougly 1/4rd and has background blur by nature. What is also annoying on the iPhone is that because the angle is so wide, there are way more objects in the background. Even a 26mm is not good for this, but again, it has 1/4rd the background objects. My 85mm full frame macro has only 2% of the background objects compared to the iPhone as the background cone is so much smaller.

*colors

I don’t think he was cheating. We know that the current/latest iPhones are known for their aggressive AI processing towards sharpness, exposure, HDR etc. Even my old iPhone XS Max produced some over-sharpened photos than my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Hope this clarifies the issue.