Ciws: :)

Next big thing: halo shield for infantry

@@doanutTHEnut future is here

A similar thing just happened to me in Battlefield 4 but in a boat. Feel bad for the crew.

@Russ Olson yea lol

But you see that's where the anti anti rocket rocket that comes from the anti rocket comes in to play. That way the rockets anti rocket rocket will be ineffective against the anti rocket.

The anti anti rocket gets an anti anti anti rocket.

There is solution, RPG-30

Arms race in a nutshell

Why bot just make the rochet faster and smart to dodge?

jager would like to know your location

I think you can still say grenade as in rocket propelled grenade

Make the rocket bigger

Epic Rainbow Jäger B)

Multiple rockets

yes

Russians had this kinds system as early as 1993 with the "arena" system

@@kidddogbites Your point? There’s a reason the Russians have made 3 APS now while most countries have taken their time and got it right the first time. Not a single Russian APS is combat proven in all those years too. The trophy system has seen combat and made combat interceptions

@@cadennorris960 my point was that this kinda technology isnt that new was all. never made any claims about its effectiveness.

@@cadennorris960 How did you get the idea that most countries got right the firtst time? Lol. Have you seen the tests and failures while they were developing their APS? I am not a fan of Russia but all those countries are in principle using the same mechanics which uses Arena or the Drozd. Combat proven? Except Trophy most of the systems did not seem combat but that means nothing because they were often tested under more than realistic circumstances. And Arena is working. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/eXmhp4WmmbBilH0.html

The blast points are to precise for Sand People, only Imperial Storm troopers are so precise.

It's called Counter Ambush for a reason, got to get Ambushed for it to work.

Didn't expect to see Lt. Gen. Armchair to be here

@@Defender78 Star Wars reference lol

Its just a fake scenario for us to see the way it works relax

Kennedy's Locksport lmao

No more cold callers....No more front garden either...thems the breaks.

Fuck men I will made this as my Key Chain.

Frag defenders.

And no more package thieves 😎👌

would be easier anti atm missile

AATGMM(anti anti-tank ground missile missile)

So if the missile has decoy it would be an anti anti anti-tank missille missile missile?

@@LOKSTED _Idk perhaps_

You're wrong! It is Missle Anti Missle Anti-Tank - MAMAT

You can stop worrying about rocket propelled grenades now.

lmao underrated

ADS v420

🤭🤭🤭 you do? Well damn bruh 🤣😂🤣😂

Abe Chodu Gubbe.

i installed this on my greenhouse a few days ago but now it's in tatters because some genius threw a paper plane at it

A Toyota with Iron fist system is called a Showa

Do you guys think it would fit on my Honda civic?

Wafi Hartono There is a video on YT of a ISIS soldier’s POV, and Abu Hajar is one of the fighters and does some weird stuff

Some say he still lies next to that plywood apc

@@yatriengineer7446 scared and alone

@Gregor Heisenhorn ok

They said it could not be quicker and more accurate They were wrong

Who ever said this? o.O Even back in the 80's where Drosd APS was fielded, it was just a question of cost.

@@nikitatarsov5172 Jäger, a operator in a game rainbow6 who uses a gadget similar to the one introduced in the video.

@@abc_8773 O...kay. Well a computer game for sure has all permission to not reflect propper knowledge of technology. I feared someone from teh military or a politican could have said that.

Well then if the aps wasnt there both the infantry and ifv would go kaboom, also shouldnt infantry already keep their distance from an ifv, specially the ones with AGMs, in consideration of backblast or the suppresive fire the IFV will most likely concure?

@@user-pq9gy3fq1q probably, and maybe the animation inconsistency was simply a mistake, it was just something I noticed

So with the same velocity as rocket that shrapnel have chance to penetrate armour? Or anti-tank rocket slow?

@@user-ee9mq3kc2n no as long as the rocket doesn’t explode directly on the armor, it’ll be fine. Its not the metal that causes the damage, its the explosion which was just neutralized.

they arent walking alongside the tank

When any simple rpg hit a target . There is a far worse collateral damage. Inside. But there is always a blast shockwave near an armored vehical. Even a tiny bullet creates such a penetration shock wave when being fired on a car for instance, that can be seen . Granted it’s tiny so we are talking in several cm at best. also...unlike the movies, modern infantry does not run side to side with a column. They are safely tucked inside till they deploy. Even when deployed , they will always deploy at either side that is opposite to the threats.

collateral*

Poor infantry walking by the armored vehicles.

@@gefiltafish2187 imagine this system in a patroling ifv, it passes by a crowded street and some tango has the nerve to fire an rpg at it.

@@flapperf4237 If they're walking, which if they have an IFV like this they probably won't be.

*limited long defense system

Reactive armor and modern armor spacing designs are revolutionary. Add APS to the equation and you’ve got yourself the future of armored warfare. Tanks are becoming useless because of drones and anti tank missiles.

Make the armor explode

@@West_Coast_Gang ...to deflect as much of the inbound explosion / superheated copper stream as possible. (Heavy) armor in general is slowly being replaced by shrapnel/rifle-caliber protection + APS.

Ingenuity in killing each other. Yes, I agree.

This is a pretty old concept , the soviets did it in the 70s i believe, it was like a huge shotgun shell that went off when a rocket was detected.

@sherdil3717 This is correct. It’s called the Drozd, and it saw some service in the Soviet-Afghan War with T-55’s and some T-62’s. Something similar is happening with the Trophy APS concerning how it shoots down the actual missile. The Drozd was replaced by ERA mainly because it had a tendency to cause friendly fire incidents when friendly infantry were nearby.

​@@blackarrow7988It barely worked.

@@ID-8491 It had a 80+% interception rate, it worked just fine.

The Second IFV Would shoot Another one

XFelix- HcSX you stink like Dookey

Either it is Directed by Robert B Weide (Or) 'Only time' by ENYA

He literally said in this video "improving rapid salvo capability". Listen more, talk less.

@Good Bye Mine trawlers, Mine flails, Ground Penetrating Radars, EOD engineers and RF jammers. No boom. If boom, Armoured vehicles have V hull shape at bottom. That plus armour = reduced boom.

Only LASER can do this.

@@WadcaWymiaru yeah

Effective against rockets, particularly explosives, but a solid or discarding sabot round is just gonna keep going, especially when using electromagnetic firing methods

@@ataphelicopter5734 no, it would still be blown out of the way or atleast knocked sideways, effectively neutralizing it. Only some very heavy projectiles could keep going after that.

Like mini iron dome

You're* dead

@@Allahuma.sali.ala.muhammad. Oh, bad luck... *WANNA WATCH A VIDEO TO RESPAWN?!*

@@MacElMasMancoDeTodos YES

@@Allahuma.sali.ala.muhammad. There you have your video: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nIGoaK1wjp2JxIU.html

Warthunder belike

Russia already has these. Russia is more advanced than the USA

They show primitive tech compared to what they actually have... meaning they will never show their real currently used tech which is pure logic

Russia more advance meanwhile they cant even fix their only Aircraft Carriers. How ironic..

Its not a secret, Israelis already have them deployed on their tanks and other countries are working on them.

This is AD for the country that wants to buy this stuff

@Gregor Heisenhorn this is an Israeli system.

Exactly

But upgraded version...

No and yes. Yes in the sense it is an APS like trophy. Also no because trophy fires a wall of explosive pellets like a big shotgun. It also uses an IR emitter for detecting threats. IR is slower than the iron fists radar which makes the trophy struggle agaiant high velocity penetrators. Iron fist fires a projecticle like a grenade with fins at the incoming threat to destroy or divert it. It uses radar over an IR emitter to detect threats wich is far faster at detecting a threat and plotting an intercept which allows the iron fist to reliably knock down even high velocity penetrators.

@@EMAXXMASTER Dude Trophy uses AESA radars AFAIK.

Peter Yim actually they can fire wire guided tow while moving very slowly. I have forgotten what the top end of that was, but it’s a crawl.

Yea, it should be. But like Brian says, they can fire then while moving slowly (less than 10km/h if I'm not wrong) but it's better to have it up and ready

there will be people fighting droids faster than we think

I mean... If anything, the military would buy this. Not many other people would.

It might be the OG-7V, the RPG-7 HE-FRAG round.

APSFDS,yes.

I'm not sure it is possible.

apfsds move really fucking fast so if it did intercept it (which I doubt) then colour me impressed

I agree with your assessment. My thoughts are that unless the discharged unit fired to intercept a LONG way off for an APFSDS, it being really close like it appears in the video, would the detonation be enough to knock the projectile off of its initial trajectory or at least disrupt the projectile enough so that it isn't allowed to strike straight on, thus defeating its ability to penetrate by virtue of the kinetic energy it would possess then lack by skewing the trajectory? Sort of like having a bullet "keyhole" on impact. The delivered energy would be significantly less but from what I could detect in the video the penetrating projectile still seemed to travel straight and not deflected to any great degree. But that is just my $0.02 on the subject matter.

"Their" technologies? It's Israeli

After watch Pentagon War, Bradley pretty much jack of all trades. Put everything on Bradley but does not excel in anything.

@@imranhazim5434 The Pentagon War is actually a movie joking about that Bradley fighting vehicle. The Bradley is actually beast! a they destroyed enemy tanks during the Iraq War.

It is illegal to install own active protection on the civilian vehicicles :((

The better question for this... Why would you need Hardkill aps on your CAR? WHERE DO YOU GO?

@@Rosie.Kawaii if he lives on ohio or chicago i'd say its justified.

dunno looks like they did nuke a fucking sabot round

Yup

I dont think it a APFSDS,there no fin and there seem to be a rocket trail look like some kind of rocket assist 25mm APDS

“They said it was designed for r6 operators”

cringe

As soon as I read the word "magic", I was convinced a mind altering substance was involved.

so we may call it a wounded anti tank rocket

The inertia of the rocket would have been substantialy reduced from the iron fists explosion.

@@poiuqwerty4283 Inertia doesnt matter for anti tank rockets. it's the explosive warhead that's the threat.

Anti tank rockets explode, they have a chemical warhead to form the metal jet, it's a shaped carge

It's HEAT rocket. Well, most of rockets are HEAT. Search it up what that means, becouse it's too complicated for this comment.

Afaik there is a datalink system with the AESA radar equipped so in theory yes they can communicate with each other and closest available takes the shot.

Lol just slavo that shit

Not really but okay

@Phoenix there's several ways to discoering IEDs Ground perforating radar, flails, rollers and so on They're still deadly if they're intelligently concealed however Having a good hull design can leave the crew unharmed, but it would still blow that track and then they'd be fucked Having anything resembling infantry nearby is a big no-no so they can't scout ahead for IEDs

@Phoenix That device is "loud" - when active scream: kill me, i am here!

Or do a salvo of missiles. Like me and my friends did in ArmA. If something works in this bugfest of a game, I till work IRL. At least when terrorists use it.

imean if they fire one at a time they go boom

I don't think the guerilla insurgents are that organised, also realize the fact that the convoy will have over watch support from a uav or some kind of satellite feed to identify event infantry the moment an attack occurs. The convoy will most likely light up the source of incoming fire with retaliatory counter fire.

Or simply bee too fast to get interceptet by this system^^ Or just not fire from the somehwat 90-110° angle it can detect the threat. Seems like a very simle to adapt solution, and somewhat logical as every old Taliban dude knows that tanks/IFV's are thickest and front. But it sounds logically, as in naval and air combat missiles actually deploy active sensors and jammer, and jammer-jammers xD Iron Fist is a low tech solution against an 20 year old problem, so it might have been okay for defense against some oldschool Taliban ... if these not recently had been supportet by the US army with somewhat 5-7 billion dollar of modern military equipment. India atm is complaining that all ther pakistani terrorists have state-of-the-art US military equip and ATGM's xD

No reason. Looks like interceptor grenade equiped with inductive sensor

They'd be toasted by the rocket/missile hitting the vehicle anyways. But generally you wouldn't have your dismounted infantry close enough to the front of the vehicle for that to be a major issue.

They are mostly located behind the vehicla

Maybe but wont the shrapnel damage the plane and miss with flight of it because of the explosion

@@georgewael3278 yeah ig so they should try to increase the reaction time and range of the APS then

Already tested in combat in 2014, israel used a (pretty much) heavier version of this on their tanks to extreme effect.

Already tested. Trophy > Kornet.

​@@adibar9066 Aged like strawberry milk

люблю всякие мультики... Голливуд особенно доставляет.

@@---ng9dc А причём тут мультки? Были же реальные кадры

sir, for your information, you can check rheinmetall Active Protection System

@@panzerjuiceinc.5183 thank you for pointing it out. Rheinmetall is like the Mercedes of the defense industry. I don’t know if Germans are even capable of engineering something badly. But speaking of the APS I still wonder how it’ll defend from something like a Malytka.

i wonder if it works in an urban enviroment tho.

It's one of the worst, but cheap. Also - as you saied - it's against low tech weapons and don't have to do more. One problem might be that this solution is for a 20 year old problem. Today Taliban have Javelin and Kornet, just laughing about IronFist. If you search good approaches, go for StrikeShield or Arena. Tracking and intercepting an object that moves 1750-2050m/s - that is awesome.

Hello, fellow ape enthusiast

Оно и джавелины может сбивать?

@@user-mn7wo9rf4b No, I think APS is designed to defeat older generation rockets; which is why they mentioned assymetrical warfare. I might be wrong, either way.

​@@heavyguy4660 Il principio è il medesimo, con qualche adattamento il sistema potrebbe funzionare anche contro altre armi anticarro compresi i Javelin.

I think the rocket explodes near the target, the explosion will do the job

bruh do you really want antifacists, who fight against corrupt politicians and dictators to be blown up ? if you really want to, shoot your feet, it's more effective

@@l0k048 they're not fighting against fascism. They're punishing average civilians who have nothing to do with corrupt politicians by rioting and burning down cities towns houses apartments and stores. Despite their claim of fighting fascism , their methods are fascistic and they promote fascistic ideologies and systems like communism and anarchy. They have also become a hub for edgy unemployed teenagers who just want to break other people's things and have nothing better to do with their time.