Those various organisms have a symbiotic relationship because they co-evolved with one another over millions of years. No god needed at all to explain how nature functions.

William Elliott Why did you capitalize GOD? Similar to IN GOD WE TRUST on dollar bill? Get back to your lodge...

"We are surrounded by a world of incredible complexity, and beauty actually. And everything about the living world screams design. If you look at the way a body works, look at the way a body of any animal or any plant works -- it's clearly designed, you might think." --Richard Dawkins

@@josh2388 the one true GOD. Creater of all things deserves capitals.

@Rebecca P Yeah, like the Corona virus.

100% agree. Got to laugh at a “scientific” community that is incapable of admitting their pet theory has long since outlived any plausible hope of support by physical evidence. 😂 God bless their darling hearts…

What have you done for others?

I love that misinformation is free.

@@GilGTG Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people? This information isn't free, it's funded by tax payers and force fed to us for "free", and we are all uncritically indoctrinated into this atheistic origins mythology as young children. It's even in our cartoons and children's stories.

I plan on purchasing the documentary on DVD. Nothing is free. It wasn't free for these people to make this film. People deserve to be paid for their work and their knowledge, which can take decades to acquire. We should be willing to pay for their expertise.

Religion is a lie, there is no proof of gods

I Love this testimony! Praise the LORD! God bless you & your husband!!!!!

Humanity has worked a long time without divine help to rid ourselves of the worst diseases imaginable: polio, smallpox, measles, mumps, rubella, rsv, flu, diptheria, tetanus, and many more. I hope your husband doesn't have to learn by experience what humanity has had to learn. That being said, I have a deep and abiding hatred for anti vaxxers.

Please explain what is the great unconformity

@@spicyroads unbiased? Oh the irony.

Do you see large boulders embedded in mudflow rocks? some of them are incredibly massive. It took alot of water to throw them around

@@spicyroads secular is the opposite of unbiased

Any scientist unwilling to declare that they do not know is not worth your time. Science is inductive - it can only ever disprove falsities.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Oh boy! I hate to be the bearer of bad news Nicholas but here is Evidence for young Earth; Most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more. Billions of years is story telling.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Also there is no such thing as evolution (No evidence for it). You continue to lie to the students with no science to back it up.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Provide evidence for evolution. I know you can not do it as there is none. All talk and no action. Good Luck!

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just as I thought, NOTHING! You are a liar.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Still Nothing?

Me and my wife give each other sloppy toppy twice a week to it. In the name of the Lord.

That's called reading from a script... But yes, it was well done.

@Boz Scaggs You are literally living surrounded by the evidence you seek. Your thinking causes you to ignore it and explain it away with other explanations. Ask God to open your eyes to the truth.

@Boz Scaggs The real world you live in was created by God. The reason you live in an ordered world, with laws like gravity you can depend upon, is because God is a God of order. Your very existence depends upon His willingness to allow you to continue to exist despite your scoffing at His existence.

@Boz Scaggs Have you watched the video, or just commented below it?

@Boz Scaggs It is/was news world wide! The book you refuse to read is the international best seller every year. Where is the proof it was changed substantially?

@Boz Scaggs Actually, the NYT took the Bible off their bestseller list because it would win every time. Yes, all belief requires faith, including belief in evolution. The origin of the universe cannot be repeated, therefore it cannot be tested as observational science can be. We'd have to have an eyewitness testify as to what happened.

The whole universe and everything in it is a miracle!

(quoted from Einstein)

There ARE two ways...

Best Answer

If we start to believe in ”miracles”, we can never be sure of anything. Just anything can happen any time.

Did you know that even the 4000-5000 year old secular Chinese language contains Biblical imagery in some of its characters? I have yet to see a reasonable secular explanation for this: For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). There are dozens of these, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist for millennia after the Chinese language began? Also *did you know that secular scientists debunked evolutionist claims to "junk DNA"?* We've been lied to. "The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse" (Romans 1:20)

The belief that nothing created everything, that nature created itself (which requires Nature to be Pre-Existent - a *supernatural* quality), that all the right proteins required for life created themselves *in contrast to the known scientific problem of hydrolysis* which prevents protein formation, that the mass quantities of instructions in DNA created themselves *in contrast to the observable evidence* that other instance of information which always has an intelligent source, the belief that fish evolve into philosophers, that we are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can just pop into existence at any moment.... *is incompatible with entire disciplines of science* . *Did you know that secular scientists even recently disproved evolutionist claims to "junk DNA"?*

@@NilsEldor 10 ways? Present them

@@NilsEldor I cannot help you

@@NilsEldor Ignorance is bliss. Any clinical psychologist could see you need help. You contradict yourself within your mind and are oblivious to the action. What's your stance on religion? Humor me. What dictates your life if not God? You claim the idiocy in me originates from a source you don't even believe to exist. I'm perplexed. Then you claim God punishes you while also pointing towards the claim that he doesn't exist? No need to respond

So they lie and you admire them for it.

Krister Andersson Hi! I’m interested in inaccuracies, could you point a few out, please? Thanks!

@D.C. a visit to you local middle school will clear be enough to debunk a whole lot of these lies.

Guia Gaston if they couldn’t comprehend it the first time I doubt it will work the second time. They want to believe this flawed opinion based video instead of you know real science.

Josh Jordison And lies through its teeth. If there was concrete evidence of a god, any of them, it would have been produced by now. However none is forthcoming. We are supposed to believe in myth and hearsay. I prefer solid scientific evidence. We don’t have all the answers yet, but the bible has had to reinterpreted so many times as science moves forward, it makes the bible pointless and irrelevant.

You are very welcome! We're so glad you enjoyed our film.

@@kimhoffmannandersen5477 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* then puddles of chemicals can turn themselves into people?

it does save thinking for yourself doesn't it?

That's literally what christians do with science. They have a narrative paradigm established by the bible and their faith and then cherry pick evidence to support their claims and ignore the evidence that refutes them. I work with a seventh day Adventist that believes in "biblical science" and we get into arguments all the time that end with him throwing up his hands saying "That's what i believe and nothing will change it!". That is the complete opposite of the scientific method

@@nicholaseaves2591 Mr. eaves, that's literally what atheists do with science as well. It's a matter of competing worldview interpretations over the exact same evidence, the difference is that atheistic-Naturalism is demonstrably internally inconsistent, it has an embarrassing history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, it can't explain foundational things that it ought to be able to explain, and it is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). We already discussed how atheistic-Naturalists believe in Supernatural phenomena (and you tried to say that pre-existence is "natural" - God is pre-existent)... you know, for all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... science.

@@michael9237 the religious answer has no explanatory mechanism. Intelligent design can't be tested. It's not even close to comparable with scientific theory

@@michael9237 btw, im not going to reply to all the assertions in your novel of a comment. Try to be more concise. This is a youtube comment thread. Not a college dissertation

Of course everything was created in 6 days. He was so exhausted that he had to have a break and rested on the 7th. This is the creator of the universe which is 92 billion light years in diameter. But you'd know all about this stuff because of your nuclear knowledge.

Thank you for sharing Pierre, you are a blessing for many of us.

The order of creation according to the Bible doesn't trouble you at all? Are you certain a bias is not at play in your post?

“I’ll never question the bible again”...? Well that’s the surest way to prove it’s true, stop questioning and it all makes sense.

@@hippopotamus6765 OK, hippo, if you're so smart, please tell us where all the matter and energy in the universe came from. And please tell us where all the laws of the universe came from. And please tell us where life came from. And the laws of morality. Tell us how evolutionists can defy the laws of science, like biogensis, the conservation of matter, the laws of thermodynamics, the laws of genetics. And finally, give us your proof that God and a spiritual world does NOT exist. Thank you.

That's because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just add *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people. "Kinds" was "invented" long before the Creation vs. Evolution debate my friend - literally thousands of years ago based on tangible manuscript evidence and historical records that we have in our possession. "Kinds" actually does have a defined limitation, it generally includes the reproductive boundaries of a creature. We literally only ever observe biblical speciation within each creature's "kind" (Dogs > dogs, finches > finches, bacteria > bacteria), never once a change between kinds (Coelacanth > Tetrapods, Dinosaurs > Chickens, Fish > philosophers). *"we see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of the ages"* (Charles Darwin) *"we are condemned to live only for a few decades, and that's too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on"* (Richard Dawkins) Whatever "evolution" is, at least we agree it's not actually "observable." The only thing we observe is biblical speciation within each creature's "kind" (Dogs > dogs, finches > finches, etc.) never once a change between kinds (Fish > Philosophers, Coelacanth > Tetrapod, etc.). All the best evidences for evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12, and if you understand "science" (a methodology) then you understand the implications of a competing explanation.

But it's not 67 million old

@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth It's thousands of years old.

Ah, a dam in a place of easily eroded sandstone, known for being easily and rapidly eroded is what exactly? Do you suppose all strata behave that way?

@@ozowen Cavitation will pulverize any rock when flowing at least 100ft/sec.

@@SirDeanosity "Any rock"? So is there a reason why the supposed Grand Canyon impact is not seen everywhere? Oh wait- there isn't. So the comment means what exactly?

@@ozowen It seems your question was answered and yet you pontificate and avoid the answer, which was correct but it didn't back your wrong bias. A global flood would provide the cataclysmic evidence we see today. Science without the bias shows this to be true. Your bias does not change truth but you knew that. There's this thing called a search engine, it will help your vain misconceptions be righted.

@@chrislachat459 The dam in question is placed on highly porous rocks subject to cavitation and easy erosion. Feel free to explain how that is the same as all rock. Reasons why there is no global flood at any time in recent history. 1) No flood strata. After any large flood event, in particular ones where there is tumultuous movement, currents, collisions of currents, concurrent tectonic activity- then any unstable strata are forced into the water, strata destroyed and the resultant strata after everything has settles tends to cruder layering in flood order (sand silt clay). We should see that globally- we do not. 2) Any aerial strata cannot be anywhere in the so called flood sedimentary layers. We have a global one plus plenty of local and regional ones all through the geo strata 3) No dry layers should be anywhere- yet there are also plenty of them. 4) Fragile laminae such as those found in varve strata have no business being in such sediment. Too fragile to survive such activity, especially since they are almost always adjacent to mountains (which were supposedly thrust up in the flood). These are biennial strata and can be manually counted- going uninterrupted, globally, hundreds of thousands or millions of years. They should not even exist. 5) Fossils should always be in muddled order. Drowned carcasses only sink to the bottom when the water is very cold. But the rapid thrust of water from the deep means the water (and air btw) get superheated by the kinetic energy alone. 6) No clear sedimentary strata for the period should exist anywhere near the upthrust mountain ranges. But they predominate. There is much more of course, but that's a start

Have you ever BEEN to the Grand Canyon!!! It is NOT composed of unconsolidated till like shown in this video. The rocks (ROCKS not soil!) are different layers of differing hardness and types that contain embedded fossils that can be seen to be of a specific type in each layer. There are several places where the planes of the sedimentary rock are tilted to extreme angles as well. NOT the result of a quick outflow of debris material but rather a slow sedimentation process that shows that different types of material were laid down at different times. ALSO the bottom of the canyon cuts through many hundreds of feet of very hard IGNEOUS rock! Rock that was molten and then solidified underground. This guy's equating of his little stream and erosion gully to the Grand Canyon is completely ludicrous! Rather than finding someone who supports your pre-conceived ideas and conclusion, why don't you look at the actual evidence first! Understand the parameters that must have existed before the Grand Canyon could have been cut and then get a real and actual conclusion. You obviously have no background in soil geology, rock geology, hydraulic physics, paleontology, geomorphology or any credible science discipline. Grand Canyon's rough dimensions: 1 mile deep, 10 miles wide, 100 miles long. Through SOLID ROCK!

@ megaterang- least 20 feet deep and a half mile long. Multiple that by 10,000 feet at least. Open mindedness. Global not county. Watch the video. If you did you closed your hearing!

megaterang yeah, a global flood! Duh! It only makes sense. I’ve thought about this for a long time. It’s actually annoying how dumb smart people can be. Forgive them God. Strengthen us to love them!

@@jimmyray5524 Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????

Ross Rosco , you wrote, "Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????" None? You must live in a cave. I believed in evolution until I was in my 60's. An examination of the geologic column converted me. There is no way those thick, homogeneous, uneroded, unbioturbated sedimentary rock layers were gradually deposited. A global flood is the only thing that makes scientific sense. Dan

How did you get that from any of this absoute nonsense?

Shane Hughes You’re just ignorant and looking for people to annoy, run along and grow up. Internet trolls really are the equivalent of annoying mosquitoes

@Ezabi ... says some one who believes in talking donkeys, talking snakes, dragons, and probably unicorns all cause "My book says so." Though thats all you have. a book that is wrong about just about everything. Oh and magic. You believe magic real

It's complete nonsense that only someone who's ignorant of science and very gullible would believe. Austin is liar and a coward.

@Kile Not resuppostions these are all things the bible say happened and the fact you still think a donkey talked at any point in time shows exactly what I was talk king about. These things never happened. It's odd the "Miracles' went from separationing the Red Sea to now where people go "I beat cancer. It was a miracle cause of god." Forgetting they took human medicine that cured them and an invisible man did nothing.

***universal time is not the same as our "clock time"***

i agree fascinating

It's more fascinating how in 2020, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary- including the fact homo sapiens behave almost exactly the same as Monkeys - there are still some people who believe Bible stories!

Exactly 😩

@@miketomlin6040 atleast better than believing there is no right or wrong and there is no meaning to life and no reason to do science

@@sathviksidd I don't understand your comment?

So, what happened after? Did you dig out? Or was your property a totaled forever? Does insurance cover anything? Seriously curious as to what happens to you when a volcano erupts on your house.

Woww thanks for sharing !

I was a kid living in Rainier when it erupted. We just had to stay inside for several days. We also had ash on our, everything.I remember looking at the two mountains Rainier and St Helen in the distance and Mount St Helen's top was flat like the top blew off

I was in grade school NYC when Mt. St Helen erupted. If I remember correctly, it was a few days to a week after the eruption. I remember one of the kids in class pointing to the window. Look! It was an overcast day, and we saw what appeared to be snow falling from the sky. It was ash, and it covered everything....Never forgot that day.

We had 1/2 inch of the ash-----Left for home watching the blast getting mommy ready to leave. Air filters were the item in demand.

Your brain is a hundred times more powerful that a modern day chip, you don't need to program your brain, it learns as it goes. What you thought as an impossible coincidence nature has already achieved it right in front of your eyes.

@@JericDacara I don't believe that puddles can turn themselves into people no matter how long you wait. Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can pop into existence at any moment? Do you also believe that 3.5 billion years ago into the unobservable past all the right proteins required for life formed themselves (already an unscientific atheist miracle) allegedly underwater on a geothermal vent with no observable evidence, in a global frozen environment from the faint young sun paradox, and in contrast to the scientific problem of hydrolysis which prevents protein formation? I don't have enough faith to believe in such unscientific assertions... "The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse" (Romans 1:20)

Thousands of publications are out there yet you chose to qoute a book written by nomads.

@@JericDacara Why does the quantity of books matter? That's a lot of scientific evidence above that you just ignored my friend - and a biblical worldview can explain all of it with internal consistency. In contrast, Atheistic-Naturalism (evolution, etc.) is internally inconsistent and self-invalidating, it fails to explain what it ought to, it has an embarrassing history of radical ad-hoc readjustment as it runs into more and more problems, and you just can't live a "meaningless evolved protoplasm" belief system in reality - 4 clear signs of an irrational worldview - none of these are a problem for a biblical worldview. For example, *did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena in order to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our universe, most of them just aren't aware of it?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent, and *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12.* And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just don't know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.

@@michael9237 so, basically you are saying your unfounded, unprovable, unnatural, non-caused, non-temporal, non-material, Omni-.*. being that you feel is real and have a personal (however one suded) relationship with, is a better explanation for the cosmos and all things in it, than something that we, humanity (a tiny blip of existence on the cosmic scale), have yet to learn. We didn't know what caused thunder...invented a god. We didn't know where rain came from... we invented a god. We didn't know...plug anything into this sot...so we created a god. How is your god idea any more justified? It is through learning, exploring, reasoning, and finding the answers that we got rid of those god ideas... this god idea is no different. Thinking you have the answer already poisons any questions you might have about how the cosmos began (if it began) and every other question you might have. Try to see without those (religious) blinders on. You will be able to see much better...and not be worried about offending an imaginary being.

*Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?* In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* ....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard? Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?

@@michael9237 You can copy and paste that garbage all you want, doesn't change the fact that this film is garbage pseudoscience contributing to the dumbing down of education.

@@Roger__Wilco With respect, at least this film presents a worldview that is internally inconsistent. Did you know that atheistic-Naturalists actually believe in *Supernatural* phenomena, they just usually don't realize it? The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

@@michael9237 I don't care about any walls of texts full of complete nonsense that you want to paste or anything from "GotQuestions .org ", again this film is garbage pseudoscience contributing to the dumbing down of education.

@@Roger__Wilco I don't think you understand the problem my friend - it's your religious worldview that is the pseudoscience here, and I say that based on empirical evidence of you misrepresenting your worldview as "science." For example, consider the following which more clearly illustrates the difference: The Creation vs. Evolution (Naturalism) debate is not about "evidence," that is a common misunderstanding. In reality *both sides have the exact same evidence* , but the difference is that both sides interpret all of the evidence very differently. For example: Evidence) Consider DNA. Richard Dawkins said a single cell amoeba has 1000 Encyclopedia Brittanicas worth of information in its DNA. This DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded instructions for building everything in our body. For example, the eye has 40 million nerve endings, 137 million light sensitive cells, a lens, and its focusing muscles move 100,000 times a day to refract light just right in order to send a signal to your brain so you can "see." DNA contains ordered, sequenced, encoded instructions with agency that tell your organs how to grow including your eyes, your reproductive system which is built to interact with the reproductive system of the opposite gender, your voice, skin, hair, and everything else about you. Evolutionist claims of "junk DNA" were recently debunked by secular researchers. *Every single instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source.* Interpretations) Now consider what these two competing worldviews do with this same evidence. Creationists consider the eye an example of deliberate intelligent design, and consistently conclude that the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source: God. Naturalists look at the eye and assert that it is a random chemical reaction that evolved and created itself over billions of years, and the information in DNA somehow created itself out of non-information without an Intelligent Source in contrast to all the rest of the observable evidence. Intelligent human beings can't hope to even begin creating an eye, but naturalists (evolutionists) are okay with believing that an eye randomly spawned itself out of a puddle or off a geothermal vent at some point in history. Creationists accept the evidence at face value as evidence of an Intelligent Creator. Naturalists deny the observable evidence (information always has an intelligent source), and/or the ordered, sequenced, encoded nature of DNA, and/or that it contains instructions and acts with agency to tell an eye how to grow. Wouldn't it be more consistent with the observable evidence to conclude that the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source? Or maybe we should just deny that it's information at all as naturalists often do... the eye's lens, 137 million light sensitive cells, 40 million nerve endings, and precise muscles to focus this system are the product of fizzing chemicals over time. And meanwhile, *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12* . Creationists and evolutionists both agree on speciation and environmental adaptation, but we disagree on macroevolution. Creationists believe that everything is created according to its kind, and this is why they recognize that we have no conclusive evidence of one "kind" changing into another "kind." It's also why Charles Darwin said "we see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of the ages" and Richard Dawkins said "we are condemned to live only for a few decades, and that's too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on" (they're talking about "macroevolution"). Evolutionists overcome this by denying "kinds" altogether - fish evolve into philosophers and we are all related to bananas. This is not a debate over "evidence" ; it's a debate over worldviews concerning the exact same evidence, and that misunderstanding (on the evolutionist side) is part of the reason it's so hard for both sides to communicate with each other on this controversial topic. When creationists see the 122 anthropic constants, the problems concerning the Faint Young Sun Paradox, a long history of radical ad-hoc readjustment in the naturalist theories, the problem of hydrolysis if life emerged on a geothermal vent, geologically active Enceladus and Pluto which should long be dead celestial objects if billions of years old, the fact that the moon would have been touching the earth within the last 1.5 billion years based on calculations concerning the tidal recession of the moon, 100,000 year old max comets, the complex interdependent male and female reproductive systems and what it would have taken for them to evolve, young Carbon-14 in billions of year old sources, fully developed vertebrate creatures in the cambrian explosion, the fact that the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics don't allow the universe to "naturally" create itself, dozens of living fossils including wasps dragonflies salamanders the 70 million year extinct coelacanth, etc. etc. etc. Creationists see a solid case for creationism, and the plausibility of naturalism diminishes. Naturalists ignore the evidence, deny design, invoke supernatural phenomena like *Infinite* alternate universes to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our origins, fabricate entire celestial objects (Oort clouds), or erroneously argue "we don't know and that's okay" when the evidence actually seems to point to a natural impossibility or absurd probabilities (formation of the universe, formation of the earth) and/or an intelligent source (DNA)... and then they call it "science." Anyone who disagrees with them is a "science-denier." See the problem? Which worldview is really honestly evaluating the evidence, and which is selectively throwing out and stretching the evidence to fit their worldview? Two worldviews, two interpretations, exact same evidence.

Thank you @Biblical_Mystery! There is much more to come!

This is laughable to anybody with a proper education in the sciences and geology.

@@The-Butcher-Jaegerkorpset Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance if you just wait a long enough *time,* and that planets can randomly clump together to meet 122 precise anthropic constants (conditions required for life) - a 1 in 10^138 probability - from a "Big Bang" by chance? Science is a methodology. What you're talking about is an Ideology, and I just don't have enough faith to believe that these unscientific beliefs happened by chance, never mind the many scientific problems with them. *"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)

I Thank YOU All" SO Much", For That Christian program Of (GENESIS History"!). The only Things). They didn't talk about Was THE Many "Earthquakes". Of "THAT'S HAPPENED"😳." THROUGHOUT The Many HUNDREDS OF YEARS".

@@The-Butcher-Jaegerkorpset okay my bulle, gaan huil by jou ma.

Well knowing that water came from beneath the earth also would assume that there was somewhat a cavern to store the water. Much like an aquifer, the water likely just made its way back to where it came. I'm no professional, it is honestly my best guess. Hope this at least gives an idea for you

Earth is still 70% covered in water today. According to NOAA, if our earth had a smooth flat "outer shell" surface (ie. no mountains, etc.), the water would be 8200 feet deep worldwide. I don't know if that measurement is accurate because I haven't verified it myself, but I do know this... Secular scientists believe Mars was once covered in water, which would explain how it has its canyons throughout - yet there is no observable liquid water on Mars. Earth is 70% covered in water, with marine fossils on mountain tops, and even solid layers of rocks bent at vertical 90 degree angles with no breakage - indicating they were soft, pliable, and *wet* when they folded - plenty of evidence for a global flood, but we say "there's no way earth could have been covered in water by a global flood." Why do we have such a double standard here? It's because of our Atheistic/Evolutionary biases in interpreting the evidence.

They evaporated!

Yeah, He found me in His written word June 18th last year. God is good.

ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz....

Indeed❤️✝️❤️

@Jimbo Bell We collectively are God my friend. We are the only creatures on earth that can combine information into formulating new ideas. We also have the ability to heal ourselves and have supernatural abilities just like "Ice Man".

Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find useful, from one Christian to another: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find of interest: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

@@IIrandhandleII Ignoring evidence is a normal atheistic-Naturalist response... *Did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena to "naturally" explain our universe?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just because their interpretation of the data don't line up with your worldview doesn't distract that they have good cinematography and screenwriting. (which is the point of my comment). Have a good day anyway ;)

@@IIrandhandleII That's a very poor response (resorting to personal insult) ...

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 That's not true, I read everything you post and have always honestly considered it - but what you post is usually unsubstantiated claims, and when it is substantiated it is always based on worldview assumptions that are demonstrably internally inconsistent, which have a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, which cannot explain things it ought to be able to explain, and which is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). 4 clear signs of a faulty worldview, none of which are a problem for a biblical worldview. Meanwhile you are the atheistic-Naturalist trolling under a Creationist UKposts video my friend, so you're also being hypocritical, with respect. Quote: "Why do I care? Were you to keep your beliefs to yourselves, I wouldn't. But in the United States today, people of faith insist on imposing their beliefs on everyone else. On social policy. On the law. On education. Religion is backward, an impediment to progress, dishonest, manipulative, the longest running scam in human history. And I am going to do whatever I can to promote its destruction." ~Nicholas Christie-Blick, 3/29/2021

What evidence?

Evidence? We’re waiting nicely

@@douglaspearce1187 Did you miss the part about the sedimentary layers and marine life? How about fossils? They shouldn't exist, they will just decompose, unless they are buried rapidly.

This seems to be an attempt to use scientific facts to involve religious beliefs and failing. The ice age is known now to come in cycles, flooding also is no stranger, Heatwave, Tsunamis, Earthquakes ain't divine intervention.

@@douglaspearce1187 Watch the video again. What’s your evidence? I like historical evidence like the 200 stories of a worldwide flood for one.

Our pleasure! We're so glad you enjoyed our film!

Notice something! Exhaustive observations? Ohhhh science? " Hebrew. "My expert has, after all his experiences and observations and explanations deep thoughts that influenced his mind. The wow factor that is the science. Thankyou Lord for the wow factor and ability to be after so many years to be impressed anew.

Thankyou Lord for my friend Noel Weeks who went through so much to have the privilege to study Hebrew ancient and modern. That over his life felt the need to write down despite all opposition and You Lord made his zeal possible I'm very late in appreciation for his efforts because he's long buried and in that place prepared for him to wait for You Lord. Thankyou Lord for Life and the wow factor I experience daily.

WOW factor

Nicholas, everyone in this film, including the host, is doctorate level educated. Which science are you referring to?…Everyone, including those scientists you choose to agree with, are giving opinions. They’re giving hypotheses. Carbon dating, at best, is highly inaccurate and unreliable. No one, including those scientists 200 years ago, was around to validate any claims. This representation, to me, has indeed met the standard to be given consideration.

@Nicholas Christie-Blick you aren't a good scientist you actually believe in fairy tales and lies, I'm sorry for your lack of faith, and also hate for Christianity and God, you must be a big sinner

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 "They are contradicted by things we learnt" or false narratives that are pushed? No... no... cant quesiton things

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 HaHaHa you are a funny person! You have been decieved just like I was and talking dillusional! God created it in six literal days in bc time we now live in ad time in a matter of about 7000 years old and Jesus will return soon to prove it as we are in the days of Noah!

@@zaney1956 No. There is no scientific evidence of that. None.

are you jooo ish?

@@danielthomas5212 White American!

Amen brother

That is, If he exist

@Jake Lloyd free will

@Jake Lloyd non, we follow scientific facts

@@joelbachmann10 It is not scientific fact if it is not repeatable. "Replenish the earth" says God.

@@fredkilian4049 --- You must be a scientist. What is your specialty?

It absolutely does say something about the age of the fossils - but the atheistic-Naturalist is in a predicament here because their a priori old-earth assumptions contradict this young evidence. They believe the earth is 4.5 +/- billion years old, they already "concluded" that dinosaurs were 65+ million years extinct, but now they have soft tissues some of which can't last for more than 650k-900k years. Biblical creationists happily accept this as evidence of a young creation at face value, but atheistic-Naturalists had to invoke a rescuing device to *stretch this evidence to fit their worldview* . What this shows us is that atheistic-Naturalism is a religion, not "science," and that their geologic assumptions about the unobservable past are unreliable.

*Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?* In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* ....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard? Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 With respect I could say the same about what you're doing Dr. Nick... but then again you're attacking the person rather than the scientific issues, so your assertion of "lies" is unsubstantiated and biased. You're also being disingenuous again: Quote: "Why do I care? Were you to keep your beliefs to yourselves, I wouldn't. But in the United States today, people of faith insist on imposing their beliefs on everyone else. On social policy. On the law. On education. Religion is backward, an impediment to progress, dishonest, manipulative, the longest running scam in human history. And I am going to do whatever I can to promote its destruction." ~Nicholas Christie-Blick, 3/29/2021

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 With respect, for all your anti-God assertions you sure do suspiciously live exactly in accordance with everything God said about you Dr. Nick, and in contrast to your own atheistic-Naturalist beliefs. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 QED indeed. Also did you know that all of your assertions are based on internally inconsistent and self-invalidating atheistic-Naturalist assumptions about the unobservable past? For example, *did you know that even atheistic-Naturalists have to unavoidably invoke Supernatural phenomena in order to "naturally" explain our universe?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just don't know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.

Helen, here is another piece of evidence that corroborates Genesis, and I hope you find it of interest: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. *The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood.* If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

@@michael9237 Wow!! I didn’t know any of those details. I am a card carrying Christian would you email that to me? I’ll send it when you respond back just don’t want to have my email out there.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 You sir have over a thousand posts on this channel. Seems to me that you are on a mission. What else do you do during the day other than hate God for creating you??

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I left you a longer comment and question on another post but quickly as a Scientist how then does soft tissue last for millions and of years in Dinosaur bones in the wild in extreme conditions?

@@Captain-Awesome Amen !!! You have to keep in mind that his Father is Satan and he will live in Hell with him if he doesn't repent.

" in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary" I disagree I watched a couple of sections and groaned at the rubbish. Like the part were they say that "you have to look at the text" about the Bible then they lie about what the Bible says about genealogy of Joseph. So a challenge pick any section of this post it here and we will look at this evidence together.

DD DDD Do you presuppose that there is no Creator, despite a creation? Awkward.

@@alphatav3733 Are you presupposing that all acts of creation require a thinking being some how? Where did you get that from? A volcano explodes creating a hole and new landscape do you think that means the volcano is an intentional being?

DD DDD so you presuppose that there isn't a Creator because you don't believe something is created? I see a building, a assume there was an architect and builder. That is my point. You believe that nothing created/formed/made/produced everything. That is also a presupposition, but it is disingenuous. The truth is that people don't want to believe in a God, because then we would be held morally accountable for all the sin in our life. Atheism allows us to make god in our image. Therefore nothing is wrong and there is no reason to argue about it. Why would you argue about something when there is no ultimate meaning to it?

Chris Young How did the volcano get there in the first place?

For more archeology from a Biblical perspective, check out the Expedition Bible channel. He discussed found cities, etc. It's another really good channel, like this one.

Gracefellowship9494 Maybe You can’t find the remains of people from the Bible, because those are just stories made up in the minds of the writers, like most books?

Yup, I had the same thought. Also, the Bible doesn't state how old the earth was before the first day. Creation doesn't start with the first day. So even with a literal reading of the text, it doesn't say how long the creation really was.

But your god doesn't exist. Fact. So the rocks you're babbling about don't declare anything. Who wrote Luke? Hint: not Luke.

@@patrickvanbaal2837 That's because you put your Faith in the modern mythology that puddles can turn themselves into people if you wait a real long time, fish evolve into philosophers, and entire mathematically ordered universes can pop themselves into existence at any moment... we just don't have enough faith to believe in that. For all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

@@patrickvanbaal2837 You'll be surprise when you see God with your own eyes in spiritual body.

@@michael9237 "we just don't have enough faith" Yes....creationists are extremely lacking in faith, that's why they're all liars!

Interesting. That complies with the conclusions presented here as well of large water-borne depositions and the bit about the underwater sand dunes locked in the upper limestone layer.

I did as well‼️I’m a born again believer & have watched a UKposts channel called “Hope Through Prophecy,” which is basically 7th Day Adventist, & have learned a great deal. After reading through quite a few mostly negative comments posted here, l was immediately uplifted when l got to yours & read it❗️l found this video well-presented & very enjoyable. CHECK THIS OUT ➡️ UKposts has an official trailer for the new Biblically based movie called “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” being released 3/20&21/2024 & shown in select theaters around the country (dates may vary, depending on your location). May God richly bless you & your husband‼️

Me too. It is a pity the presenters don't understand that the Universe is much older than the surface of this earth. The comment in day 4 is an aside (He made the stars also). It does not state that the stars were spoken into existence on Day 4 of the creation week.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 lol , the vast greatness of God cannot be questioned by mortal man, God is Spirit. I trust the word of God over any science, we could not have science if not for God and His Bible. I believe the Bible and take every word of it literally and if that makes me a fool then I’m a fool for the Lord God. This explanation makes perfect sense on how it was all done by God. But then Gods word tells us God will confound the wisest. Thanks for your input, I will pray that your heart will open your mind to God and not so much on man. God bless

are you an ethnic jew?

which god??

@@bicycleutopia , there is only one true God. LOL

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 A bit late, but excellent post, dude.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 outstanding ego my friend!👏👏👏

@@matman4464 Or he is speaking truth. Which is far more likely- ego or not.

I applaud you for not giving in to the scientifically ludicrous mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles can literally turn themselves into people if you just wait a really really long time, and that "nothing created everything accidentally." Unfortunately you fell into the militant atheist troll trap on this page... but amen sister. Look up GotQuestions if you need answers to hard Bible questions. Your kids are not "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you - they are valuable human beings made in the image of God. *"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord"* (Romans 6:23) *"It is appointed for man to die once, then comes Judgment"* (Hebrews 9:27)

@@michael9237 Mikey will actually try to encourage you to lie to your kids. The "science" on this video is nonsense. Your kids might start by being fooled, but when they eventually learn actual science, and the actual scientific method, then this fetid BS will necessarily fall by the wayside. Then you will need to deal with the fact that your kids will regard all that you "explained" to them as nonsense. That's a normal parent thing- so no worries. But the fact that they will likely turn away from God because the limited and nonsensical version preached here- well that will be a sad thing indeed.

I just don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers and that puddles can turn themselves into people if you just wait a really long time. Here's an observation/question: 1-) DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded information that "tells" your body how to grow, including instructions for your eye. 2-) Every single observable instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source (the words on this screen, in a book, programming in your computer, etc.) Conclusion) Therefore, consistently interpreted, the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source (a Creator - God). How do you handle this observable evidence? Do you: A) Consistently interpret this evidence - the information in DNA had an intelligent source like the rest of the observable evidence. B) Inconsistently interpret the evidence - information in DNA Unscientifically must be the exception to all the rest of the observable evidence. Information created itself from non-information just that one time. C) Deny that it's information, it's just chemicals - chemicals just fizz into your eye's concave light-refracting lens, 137M light sensitive cells, 40M nerve endings, and precise muscles that auto-focus this complex optical system 100,000 times a day. D) Ignore the evidence, say "well science just doesn't know yet," insist on an Atheistic/Naturalistic explanation. *Wouldn't it be more scientifically consistent to interpret the information in DNA as also having an Intelligent Source, like all the rest of the observable evidence...?* Your answer speaks volumes about your scientific/unscientific worldview assumptions/biases.

Is the earth..flat ? Since curvature can't be proven

Mabuhay! We're in Davao City. What place are you in?

Define factual i mean Jesus Christ you people are living in a fantasy land lol grow up

You set the bar for critical thinking far too low.

@@profphilbell2075 Maybe or maybe not.

Amazing, praise God

@@profphilbell2075 it's called faith and reasoning. I don't have to see something to know it exists or it's true. I've seen more in my life than anyone would understand and it's all God.

And if you’re a true believer of Christ you must watch Tovia Singer’s Isaiah 53 video, you’’ll love it! G-d bless you 🤗

@@maylingng4107 With respect, what's miraculous is that evolutionists literally believe that mass quantities of ordered and sequenced instructions (DNA) can come into existence out of non-information without an intelligent source in contrast to every other observable instance of information in existence which always has an intelligent source . It's sad that when they run into a problem like young comets that don't fit in their billions of years atheistic religion (evolution, Big Bang, etc.), they are willing to fabricate entire celestial objects like Oort clouds without a shred of observable evidence . When we find young soft tissues in dinosaur fossils, or young C-14 inside of diamonds, coal deposits all across the US, and in fossils from every geologic layer, evolutionists just reject it and twist the evidence to fit their atheistic religious beliefs concerning our origins. Then when the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and other laws of physics contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (making it naturally impossible) they invoke infinite alternate universes... a supernatural solution that supersedes our observable laws of nature, and btw, *infinite alternate universes and realities mean that there is inevitably an alternate universe that is run by magical fairies and with T-Rex's driving tanks down the street... that means that this popular atheist theory requires atheists to concede that their beliefs include the possibilities of magical fairies and other absurd fictional ideas.* And all along the way, you literally believe that we are distantly related to a banana, among so many other problems.... and then they call it "science." Evolution - the internally inconsistent, existentially unviable atheistic religion with a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, and which cannot explain basic things that it should be able to explain. These things are not a problem for a biblical worldview. I'm not sure you have any grounds to mock Christians May Ling Ng. "It is appointed for man to die once, then comes judgment" (Hebrews 9:27).

In the end almost every atheist will argue that there are thousands of universes and we happen to live in the one where life could exist the way it has and is now. So where exactly is the machine that's spitting out thousands of universes and where does it get the mass and energy to do so? People often criticize any religious belief strictly because they do not want to answer for anything and live as they see fit. Don't judge them for that show them love, hate and blood profits mankind nothing

@May Ling This isn't a question of evidence, it's a matter of competing worldviews over the exact same evidence. For example, please consider the following observations from your belief system (several of which you have personally championed here): The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

@@michael9237 MICHAEL you are a absolute Menace to atheist in this comment section and I’ve read so meny of your comments, I’m a brother in Christ is there any way I could get in contact with you, Facebook ,snap chat email, phone number anything man, I’m very Shook by your intellect and I would like to talk to you farther brother

@@maylingng4107 There is a word for people who fail to see life for the precious gift it is...bigoted or hateful.

Never heard of orogenesis?

@@h.gonyaulax2190 They probably don't understand tectonic plate movement either.

@@Fairburne69 you can understand plate tectonics without agreeing in old age Earth.

@@quix66hiya22 Ah no you can't. Clearly you don't understand.

As the ice age glaciers crawled over the land it picked up sea shells as it worked it's way south, then when the ice age melted it left sea shells scattered here and there. I've picked up sea shells in Kentucky. The glaciers changed the earth"s surface such as the Grand Canyon.

Please show me how I may record it to watch later. I am elderly.

@@rosefenton3005 There may be a way to record but I use a software that I purchased. Sorry.

@@javiermgtaoism5702 What is the software, stuff like this is invaluable, but I have a lot of gray hair so it has to be relatively simple, thanks in advance.

@@robertashcraft1360 I am not an advertiser and hope it will not be interpreted as spam. The software is called 'Wondershare Uniconverter'. It costs about 39 US dollars for a years subscription. I have downloaded hundreds of videos and movies with it.

Please pay the Author guys, Thou Shalt Not Steal.

Maybe God created evolution.

@@WildPhotoShooter Look in the mirror.

@@WildPhotoShooter Exactly. Faith is the belief in the unknown. If it was known we wouldn't need to use our faith.

@@immar1075 That's not entirely accurate. You have faith in the pilot every time you step onto an airplane, faith in a doctor every time they operate on you, faith in your teacher every time you uncritically accept what they are teaching you as true (evolution?). That's what faith is. Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough *faith* to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend....

@@michael9237 " Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough faith to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend...." Where did you ever get the idea that I believe any of which you spoke above. You assume much my friend....

good job Scott.

@@tpstrat14 you are blind. I pray God will open your eyes. But Tim you got to want the truth no matter where it leads. Even if it means that you are wrong. Do you want the truth ? Here how... In your heart call out for God to reveal it to you. Humble yourself before him and harden not your heart to Him. Change

@@tpstrat14 I don't know about you, but when I see a painting,I know there was a painter. When I look at a building I know there is a builder. When I look at creation.....guess what?

Billy Baker you imagine it requires a creator. The variety of species doesn’t need anything except time.

@4 Hounds Who Heal Evolution is a fairytale, fairy!

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. . .. ..

@JESUS slaves, it's a shame none of it is true.

@@Gamefan86 behind me Satan! I researched it all and found the Truth. I won’t give you counterarguments because you won’t read them but continue searching the Truth and you will find it.

I know you will come back here someday and say you found Jesus. Because all that search for Truth sincerely will find it. Meanwhile I’m praying for you

I lived in Baton Rouge, where is the lake drilled you are talking about? Is it Avery Island? I would like to look it up on Google Earth. Thanks.

@@markterzano8962 Lake Peigneur, 1980

@@markterzano8962 Lake Peigneur, there's an episode on Engineering Disasters about the accident with video. Pretty wild stuff, glad no one was hurt.

I would too, but that's a very exegetically in-depth topic and I'd be wary of searching for something like that on UKposts. Dr. Michael Heiser wrote a couple books on the subject: "The Unseen Realm" and "Reversing Hermon" which both dive deep into what the fine details of the text in light of ancient Near Eastern culture say about that particular topic.

@@Steven-ff4wl Agreed Creationism is not science because it invokes supernatural phenomena that cannot be tested. Read more: www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128335-100-geology-will-survive-creationist-undermining/#ixzz6U7ZSTKQs

@@Steven-ff4wl Exactly.

@@pauljeffries2069 I don't know who you are replying to. Who's Steven? As far as Creationism not being science, your understanding of it is wrong. #1 - Creationists that are scientists see scientific problems with Naturalism and Materialism, which are also not science, when it comes to origins. #2 - Creationism uses the supernatural event of creation as a fundamental starting point, then does the science to see if what we see and observe backs up the event, by what is observed and tested. Observation, testing, and making predictions is part of creationism as much as any other realm of science. NOBODY was there. NOBODY can recreate the origin of the universe in a laboratory. NOBODY has any empirical evidence for proof. Both sides have a model. Both rely on faith for the origin of the model. It is just as supernatural to say the universe came forth from nothing by natural means. What natural means can be observed that ANYTHING can come forth from nothing, let alone, EVERYTHING. You have more faith in your story than I have in mine. Hence, Naturalism is not science. The is zero empirical evidence everything came from nothing by natural means. Everybody IN science DOES science but, when it comes to origins, who says you have the floor to demand the biblical supernatural cannot be a starting point for origins? Plenty of the world's great scientists down through time had no problem with that starting point. Because you do, you think you can refer to PhD scientists that choose another model for origins, as not practicing science in their chosen fields? Please, do let us have common sense.

@@REFondrums ignoring half of the evidence to come to a conclusion you already believe isn't science 😂

@@SchiwiM Ditto. What is your evidence for everything from nothing by natural, material means? You ignore evidence for the impossibility but, you are content to believe and start there. Some would call that hypocrisy. I would. Laughing to tears does not help your side, at all. It shows its basic emptiness of anything but ridicule, which is not science, as you well know, looking back through the history of scientific discovery through actual, scientific methods. Ridicule is a poor man's evidence. So are trolls, for that matter.

These videos spew total rubbish.. Creationism & Genesis are completely false. Evolution is real!

@@Paul-hl8yg There are missing links. This video states changes via evolution, but only changes within a species. The thing I'm confused by is the Earth being 6000 years old when ancient trees exist that have rings showing 20,000 years. So Bible says 6000 years yet there is clear proof of 20,000 years at the very least. I know carbon 14 dating is a mess for dates beyond 20,000 years.

@@martinwoodworth3715 Creationism is false, utterly & completely false! .. The Earth is millions of years old, the sun older than the Earth & the Universe 13.7 billion years old. All these are facts, that have been studied. The data that makes these figures, come from many sources. Evolution is completely true & again, many sciences all come together for this. The whale, for instance.. We have found fossil evidence that they once walked on land. We have found transitional fossils, creatures that once lived & were ancestors of the whales. Whales are mammals, they breath air, like all mammals. Even their tail bones show, that they once walked, not swam! All fish have gills & do not breath air like mammals. Fish tails always go from side to side. Yet all the mammals in the seas, their tales go up & down. The bones in those aquatic mammal, show ankles, knees etc, that have elongated & changed for swimming. There are microscopic creatures living on our eyelashes, which clean them. They eat the debris on the lashes. Since the invention of mascara, these creatures have evolved. Everytime someone uses mascara, the creatures start to die off. However before they do, the last eggs laid, hatch with their digestive systems changed, to only eat mascara! Then, when the person stops using mascara, the same happens again, but the creatures have adapted their digestive system, to only eat the normal debris again. This is evolution in action, a creature adapting to its environment physically, for existence. There is no proof or verifiable evidence for any of the worlds deities, none, zero! Yet an abundance of data, proof & verified evidence for the old Earth & for Evolution!

@@Paul-hl8yg If carbon 14 dating can't be trusted beyond 20,000 years I want to know how they date rocks to be 4.5 billion years. I'm very open minded & not a Christian. I am spiritual & love science. Science is our ability to understand our surroundings. Bible talks of beings living 800 years, these were aliens. They messed with our dna theory is very interesting theory too.

@@martinwoodworth3715 Also, always always remember.. Anything that claims to be a "god", is not worthy of that title! And, if such a great being actually existed, surely it couldn't just exist? Surely 'it' had to have a beginning? Surely 'it' had a parent/s or species to belong to itself? Firstly Man invented gods, then they decided there must only be 'one'. Why? The Pharaoh Akhanaten was the first in recorded history to claim, there was only One (the Aten) & the word spread. Then people, later to become "Jews", carried that forth, making their own religion, with their own "one god". Plagiarism is rife within religion!

Shame it is not science nor factual.

@@globalcoupledances Yes, creationists deliberately misinterpret the data.

@@globalcoupledances Actually, the data isn't even correct. It isn't a matter of misinterpreting it, it's a matter of ignoring well known facts in order to 'prove' your own biases.

True love = the love of God! *God himself went to the cross for you out of love for you as a human being* Philippians 2:5-8

@@Hannestv4607 Absolutely and totally incorrect FALSE information. Jesus died on the cross.....NOT God. However, Jesus claimed to be the son of God.

I didn't think anyone had seen it more than me. That might count.

You must check out Brian Nickels Hydroplate theory here on UKposts. It's an amazing look at the evidence from a scientific approach. It's a 6 part vid you can't miss it.

@@ourlifeinwashington4114 Sounds awesome... thanks

Have you seen Evolutions Achilles Heel by ICR?

@@knightclan4 no but I'm about too. Tyvm

Amen!! Amen and Amen!!!!

Amen !

Why would an all loving being require that we worship them? It's soooo egotistical!

@@bluenose7984 He never told nobody, you mast warship Him. Who you love , you warship too. But one rebel love only himself and nobody ellse. This person is really egoistic . By the way ,do you love your parents ?

@@no-yp4ts Worship is not love, we love our family and friends but this being needs to be worshipped which is fanatical love!

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. .

The meaning of life is to survive and have offspring.

AHA which sun died for 3 days?? TO which Jesus died at the Pasa! So what does this have to do with December?

Watch zeitgeist the movie, the religious part, you can find it here on YT.

@@Gamefan86 the "meaning" of life is procreate one's own competitors to survival? where do you thoughtless cretans come up with this stuff?

@@bartbannister394 I would be very interested in reading any book you could recommend considering the discrepancies in age of these dating methods which I found to be a perplexing issue as I continue to investigate. Thanks!

Yes Great description; i agree with your commebt

'what holds the sun in place and the earth and moon on the tightly controlled orbit.'? Err... that would be gravity! The moon used to be much closer to the Earth. The moon's distance from the Earth is increasing by 4cm per year. Earth is 91.40 million miles from the Sun in January and 94.51million miles away in July. The Sun and the Solar System are travelling in the Milky Way galaxy and their speed around the centre of the Milky Way is about 220 km/s.