"Maybe it's not different. Maybe I was wrong." This is probably the most respectable response anyone could give and it says so much about the person.

I felt Jim may have been too far onto the protester's side until that last bit he did with the airhorn, stopping her from speaking. Nice to see he's pointing out hypocrisy and faulty reasoning no matter who is behind it.

"Any comment on the Nazi presence?" "Yeah I don't like Nazis" absolutely solid reply

"I'm using my free speech to criticize them" Yes, the airhorn and white noise are quite compelling arguments. 😂

Gotta respect a man who's able to admit when he thinks he's wrong.

i loved the airhorn bit at the end

You should post the entire interview.

The air horn move at the end with that PC girl was priceless!! 😂 😂 😂

So this is why people are scared of video edits, they can make you seem however they want

That girl needs to learn that random loud noises are not considered "speech".

I would love to see a Jim Jefferies interview like this with a clock in the background

The air horn on the girl was comedy gold 😂

The face when he pulled out the air horn 😂

The air horn bit was GOLD. her face 😂

Shutting down Peterson's events and then calling yourself a supporter of free speech is hypocrisy at its best.

The last part with the air horn was hilarious!!!

"maybe I was wrong" That's a good man. When was the last time any of us had the guts to say that?

Anyone else remember when Jim and Comedy Central deceptively altered Avi Yemini's interview, then Yemini posted the uncut version?

Jeff is mouthpiece for whoever provides milk to his table

Let's take all of his quotes out of context and make a funny - comedy central guy

Honestly, Peterson was open to the idea that he may be wrong and was willing to hear the opposing argument. The lady wasn't and wouldn't even acknowledge Jim's POV. I think this is mainly shows the issues on tribalism.

"you're not going to force me to respect you..." I couldn't agree more

Conservatives didn't eat it up. All reasonable people ate it up

Really disappointed with that interview. There's plenty of things you can disagree with on Peterson without misrepresenting him.

Every single clip was taken out of context... For fucks sake. When will these people learn. Every time they do this, people see right through it.

Avi Yemini just exposed you bro lmao

"why does the noise have to be white" Jpb: "😐😐😐😐.... Hahaha" 🤣🤣🤣 Same

"I'm using my right to criticize them" What you're doing is not criticism, it's censorship.

UNEDITED VERSION IMMIDIATELY ! ....please

this was... a lot less of a shitshow than i thought it would be

Even For Jim I thought this was a little sleezy to cut up his arguments and put words in his mouth to paint a picture. Im sure the conversation was great the editing was foul tho

If you actually listen to even one of Jordan Peterson's full interviews or lectures you'd realize he's the most reasonable person with a platform. Its a shame people just hear he's phobic or whatever and right him off as far right. The people who do this should be ashamed of themselves

"it's like stand up, but instead of laughs..." as laugh tracks back this video 😂

5:16 This type of behavior is why young people aren't watching TV anymore. We're tired of producers manipulating interviews in a manner that feels disingenuous and dishonest. What was his next sentence? Was the reply shown lifted from a 3 minute explanation in which Peterson clarified his views? No thanks, CC.

A comic as a journalist is the funniest thing about this video. 🤣

The airhorn was the best!!!😂😂

There are plenty of reasonable criticisms that can be levelled at Peterson. And this video touches on a few of them. But I really don't think he can be accused of flirting with the alt-right. He's spent much of his career lecturing about the dangers of radical far-right ideology. There are videos of him dismantling their core principles in quite some detail. But he engages with them rather than just insulting them, because he wants to change their minds, and pull them back to a moderate individualism.

The moment JP admitted that his conclusion about not serving gay people was too fast, and that hes was wrong about it (because it was a spontaneous question/answer that needed more thoughts) made me respect him even more.

Wonder how many people here would look if we edited together clips of your life. Especially Jim.

"Why do you care what they call themselves?" "I don't care. I care when people tell me what I have to say." Bingo!

The air horn piece was priceless. It’s like when a kid plugs his ears and makes noise when a parent is talking.

They should do a segment on how much of a sell out Jim Jefferies is.

4:24 "i'm using free speech to criticize them" Really i did not hear many arguments from the airhorn.

Whoa, he got so OWNED because he thoughtfully considered the counterpoint and was willing to admit he was wrong/change his stance? I guess we need some legislation that forcefully changes the definition of owned.

Hey Jim, release the 40 min full interview so you can get respect from your fans.

Nice edits there jimmy. Why dont you release the full interview?

Don't trust anything this Jim guy does, he just edits to get fake answers.

The airhorn was epic 😎

I love how he was faced with a good point, reconsidering his own and changed his opinon. What an adult thing to do

Peterson: maybe i was wrong about that. This made me like him more. A true sign of a scientific thinking person is the ability to change his mind.

I like that Jim Jeffries airhorned the feminist at the end, because it really drove home the horrible irony I see with people forcing others to use words they don't want to use while rallying around our charter of human rights. On the other hand, it's sad to see Peterson have the current free speech argument compared to the civil rights movement. The problem I find with that comparison is that there's a big difference between open hatred for a skin color and people simply refusing to be forced by law to use preferred pronouns. Personally, I think there is no harm in attempting to help a trans person feel safer or more welcome by asking them what they like to be called, but I also don't think it should a chargeable offense NOT to accomodate a person with their preferred gender. Why not, you ask? Here's a better question: how would they enforce it anyway? You can bet there will be full on lynch mobs and witch hunts that will all boil down to "he said she said" court cases that will never see any tangible result in sentencing. The whole legal system will have to change.

The air horn part at the end was hilarious 🤣

only clicked for Jordan Peterson, back to living my life without comedy central

"Fuher " lol. I would love to see the WHOLE UNEDITED interview

This aged like cottage cheese left on a roof in Death Valley in mid July.

It's not just "conservatives" that like Jordan Peterson

How to misrepresent someone in 6 shite minutes.

Jim Jeffries the islamophobe.

This was actually really well done and I loved how he blew that air horn to point out the hypocrisy

The government can be looked at as an overlooking body that maintains peace within a region. To do that fairness is very important. In this modern day and age there are a lot of ideas on right and wrong circulating within regions the government overlooks. The best way to maintain fairness must be to establish common ground and come to an agreement on what to be used to implement laws. So far the scientific and logical basis has worked to create peace as its reasoning is followable and doesn’t have cracks, or at least is the least cracked logical flow that can be followed. So as the government sets rules to be followed there must be concrete reasoning for imposing them. Using the baker analogy, refusing to give someone service for a specific reason must mean that it’s more costly to provide this service because of that reason. Assuming two exactly similar orders came in from two people who only differ in race, there is the insinuation that one race is less valuable than another if one customer is is denied service. Government intervention is based off of concrete scientific proof that the two people are actually equal, and therefore it would seem sort of fair to force someone to operate according to the logic provided by provable science in order to maintain the peace. With the exact same scenario with sexuality being the difference now, it seems as though the government’s reasoning is based on the idea that their sexuality doesn’t make them scientifically any less human, any political stance held wouldn’t do so either, so you can’t deny someone service simply bc they’re homosexual or even completely racist. Like a customer could probably walk in with a swastika tattooed on their forehead and you wouldn’t be allowed to deny them service. When it comes to the type of cake to be made however, the government has established that some ideas can be worth more than others, because it uses ideas it has chosen and therefore must be able to identify which ones are “the best”. Some cakes would be used to push certain ideas or atleast act as though they’re true. To demand a baker bake any cake demanded of them would be to demand they treat all ideas as equal. The government doesn’t believe that itself which is why I think you would be allowed to deny service to a customer requesting you decorate a cake with swastikas and the words “kill all Jews”. So making a cake congratulating a homosexual couple on their wedding probably isn’t a must if requested, or even a straight couple. The government would need proof that heterosexuality and homosexuality are inherent in human beings so that they aren’t considered ideas but rather similar to race. Or proof that there are absolutely no effects on a person’s life to being either so that the two “ideas” are scientifically and logically equal. With the pronouns issue, the “logic” behind it isn’t concrete. There are clear holes in the logic behind why gender lies on a spectrum and all the info behind why such preferences should be considered this heavily. It’s not following the scientific method, isn’t concrete enough for government implementation and is clearly a pov held by one of the many groups protected by the government. It seems as though the fairness of the government that is very important in order to maintain peace is withering away because of the lack of keenness of those working in government, and speaking out about it should be looked at as an attempt to keep the region together rather than letting it break apart into smaller ones controlled by their own smaller governments, bc that collapse would be a very bloody scene. We need to wait for the science to develop to an extent that these issues can be studied accurately, seeing as though that’s the government’s to for reasoning, before using the government to implement laws that aren’t based on concrete ground, bc otherwise you get a fairly unreasonable government and usually when that’s the case the situation doesn’t tend to be resolved peacefully.

I hope people don't take this interview as a serious disscussion, way too many quick cut-aways from Petersons talks without proper context.

full Peterson interview?

First and last time I've seen and heard of Jim Jeffries. "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." -Confucius

Jim Jefferies is a comedian and comedy is what he do, if you came here waiting to watch a full non edited debate, you are in the wrong channel

The guy changed his mind or at least stopped to think when confronted with a good argument. I don't know him, but that is a better sigh than college girls that don't want to hear anything that confront them.

Lol, as slanted as the edits are, the moment when he air horned that chick made it all worth it *dying*

That was really good Jim.

I don’t even care about the out of context edits anymore, 5:30 was just too hilarious

"I'm a good liberal" Is easily your best joke Jim.

That airhorn bit...

Jim is woke af

"Freedom" of speech is the last refuge of the scoundrel. Not just "freedom" of speech, but also "freedom" of association and "freedom" of religion. What the drivers of...you know...loudly yelp when you try to improve society.

Havent seen JJ in some time. What a puppet. Shame. Next

The Comedy Central editing to make the guest look bad and the host look good gets old. I would rather see a unedited interview.

Even with all this out of context edits I still like Jordan

Going by all the comments, I'm going to guess a bunch of Peterson-fanlobsters have watched this video and downvoted it ... even though Jim showed the college anti-free speech protesters as wrong, did that whole gag with the airhorn and mostly agreed with that one thing Peterson said .... because he also showed how illogical Peterson's point is, for a brief moment of the video?

i'm a left leaning liberal and love peterson. So does Russell Brand ffs. You don't have to be a conservative to enjoy thought provoking ideas!

It's sick how they edited together 100 clips from different contexts and didn't even manage to make Peterson look all that bad.

Jordan Peterson admitting 'maybe i was wrong about that' after Jim made a very valid point that Jordan could not just dismiss. I respect that a lot. You gotta take something from this. It shows Jordan is someone that truly wants to move forward in the name of fact and science and is able to stick true to what he believes in. He is not just someone that wants to win the argument or puts his ego before his beliefs.

Jim should get a Oscar for editing interviews there's no one better

4:25 but you’re not criticizing. You’re shouting him down.

The airhorn at the end was just brilliant hahaha.

Kinda wish it was actually a full interview

Did they edit this interview as well?

The airhorn part lol

Ah crap, I liked Jim Jefferies until now

I'm so happy he pulled out the airp-horn!!!! Perfect point made!!!!!!

Jordan Peterson condemned white supremacy, he made a video called, “Why Hitler is worse than you think.”

I cannot wait when joe rogan or crowder interviews dr. Peterson on this interview and well hear the real story

Dissappointed with this. I like Jim Jefferies and I don't necessarily disagree with some of his criticism however this a cheap shot at Peterson and an attempt to frame him as more extremist than he is through video editing. Whats more Jim Jefferies is a comedian and there wasn't a single joke in it. Russell Brand is about as Left wing as it gets and he clearly was able to agree on a lot of things with Peterson and they had an intelligent exchange. Peterson can hardly be considered far right.

wow. u have to watch it until the end! it's worth it!

”I hate this video it's biased!....I love the part at the end with the blowhorn hurdur!”

man, what's with the editing... lotta hack bits here

"maybe it's not, maybe I was wrong about that" that moment is stunning. I actually think the cake thing is a bit different, but what is amazing is how he didn't hesitate to admit he may have been wrong. it's so clear that truth and not winning the argument is Peterson's goal.

Jim: “but unlike comedy, it shuts down college campuses” Actually Jim - that, too shuts down plenty of them as well!

Thanks Avi Yemeni for showing me what Jim is really like.

Jim was losing me on this one till the air horn, then I remembered the true nature of satire.

Where can you see the whole show?

At the heart of it all he is correct. The government should not be enforcing rules about speech or telling me what I have to say. On that I think we can all agree

A couple bits of Comedic misrepresentation, a very good challenge on the Cake issue (maybe you need to have a long form chat together) and the Airhorn part was absolutely inspired. A solid 8/10