Totally agree

Tell that to chucky

Hahaha, many great comments here :))

*kasparov moves pawn* Me *resigns*

@@mewmannamwem6087 Yes because you see that line is un-winnable for whatever color you're playing 😂

underrated comment

Lmao this should be on like 10k likes

That will earn you thousands of likes in the future. You had mine before writing this

Well done. Very good comment. 10/10

I liked this comment before 10k likes. Cheers.

I think he means he didn't expect Karpov Qe8?

When you do something so many times your brain starts to calculate things even if you don't feel like you aren't paying attention to it.

​@@manuman5319 In the end, intuition in chess cames down to pattern recognition. You saw many different positions many times, and u know what positions should be winning for u and just play a move based on that. Often, there is no need to ACTUALLY calculate, which is actually see what are gonna be the next possible moves and lines that derive from your candidate move. If you always calculated every single move you do on the board with a good depth of maybe 10 moves ahead, you would be an engine. It's very tiring to calculate with a good precision, and therefore no human can do it ALWAYS, for long periods of time. And let's not forget that we often make mistakes or miss something on the spot, and that time management on a match is a big factor too. Often times when you play chess, you just think "I think this is a fine move, let me see if there is an immidiate threath... Uh... Yea, seems good, let's do it." This feeling is much more accurate and much more profound at GM level, and even greater at Super GM level. Kasparov was a beast at many things on the board, and his "intuition" is one of the most remarkable things about him. More than World Champion, Garry is chess legend - there is no discussion about that.

@@manuman5319 more like humans are bad at calculation. When you just play so much you have intuitive pattern recognition and that's where humans are actually good . Every humans sucks at pure calculation even a super grandmaster , they are not inhunan geniuses who can calculate like a computer

@@manuman5319 you dont have to do something so many times... your brain calculating and deciding things all the time without your consciousness, not only in chess.

Number 1 Kasparov has natural talent for the game. Number 2 Kasparov has most likely devoted a significantly larger amount of time to chess than you, if I were to take a guess I'd say you are an occasional chess player. Number 3 This game was part of the Kasparov-Karpov match for the World Title, so he probably spent a good deal of time mulling over each possible move and combination before going for it. So my point is that you shouldn't feel like an idiot in view of the fact Kasparov is the exception and not the rule.

Truth hurts

@@jacoboribilik3253 :)

Not trying to flatter anyone. Simply pointing out that he rapidly shows a number of outcomes in the same amount of time it takes me to decide my opening move as I originally stated; i.e. he's a lot better at chess than I am. Whether or not it's normal for him is irrelevant as it's not normal for me.

@@jacoboribilik3253 I have never seen such a beautifully crafted comment in my history of scrolling through youtube comments

huh

ahahahah

Me too 😄

I do analyzing game every won game with 1100 rate 😄 🤣

😂👍🏻👍🏻

i think Fisher can be compared to Kasporov, Carlsen is a genius without a doubt, but he seems slower in this thinking compared to what kasporov shows.. i wanted to meet each other on their peaks.. would be nice to see

I think fischer very much understood his positions as well as kasparov. He was an excellent calculator

Carlsen said same thing, they all are talking about subconscious mind.

as expected from Botvinnik's apprentice

True

Hahahahahahahha

😁👌

Or card tricks too

Heh, with his lack of poker face, he’d not be a very good pick pocket hahaha. Watch some footage of his reactions to blunders, and you’ll see why Kasparov had to retire from his career as a professional poker player prematurely.

He was tho, in mother rusia

2 absolute geniuses

Right. And karpov is like +10 years. Both goats

Karpov and Fischer was the great match the world of chess missed out on.

@@andymullarx6365 yes the world missed that, I don't think Karpov could have defited Fischer, but it's possible that Karpov would have grown in that match enough to later beat Kasparov.

@@cristiangamboa2037 please don't underestimate Karpov. He was world champ and won Candidates many times to challenge Kasparov later on

don't think so

Best comment :D

Surodeep Sheth This man.

Not even funny..

Surodeep Sheth he can't

Man, if u study a lane u know the position

I had the same opinion when I first saw this some years ago. But after studying chess everyday, it is not as remarkable as it appears. Gary also said, “I found some of these later.” Clearly he looked at this for a long while before the interview. Chess players also use technical memorization tricks like chunking and retrograde analysis. Check out GM Maurice Ashley’s Ted Talk on the subject. I never thought I could do this. Now I have several games committed to memory and I’m 46. In summation, you def can do this with some effort.

@@wiredog771 Oh, come on! If you had progress in chess good for you, if must have take effort and dedication. If the case of a GM like Kasparov that effort and dedication is just out of reach for most ordinary men. So please refrain next time you have the urge to say "oh i can do that too, is easy" or "is not remarkable". It makes you look as a dbag, plus is not truth: nothing is easy, everything takes dedication.

@@jaconova No it does not make him look like a 'd-bag', it makes you look very weak for not believing in yourself.

J.C Rodríguez I’m not saying I can do that. Jesus, I was at the chess forum in nyc last night and lost 13 games in a row. I’m only 1500 elo but I was 950 two years ago. All I was trying to do was to encourage those who watch this who don’t study chess and will be scared off the game completely or from trying to get better because to the untrained eye, this looks super human when, after you get a coach and study a single position or game for a period of time, these calculations don’t seem impossible. Most 2000s I know have dozens of games memorized. I’m not a d bag. But thanks for the encouragement.

He did cover this game in the video, Karpov is the challenger

Nobody: Agadmator: well hello guys

Captures Captures...

Somewhere looking at an engine and being a shit player.

@@tedsretardretardium6174 He is rated above 2000

+Mojjj Wait. If you move white pawn to E5 at the start you make imposible move and you will be suspended. And in this case the oponent automaticly wins.

+DarkEssence kasparov must have given away the first move (being the better player)

+Mojjj lol 1 e5 is illigal :D so u would just lose right away no need to resign :)

Hahaha

+Mojjj this is funny anyway

They did in most Kasparov, Karpov games.

🤣

you should try moving pieces on a high quality set. Weighted pieces are a pleasure to move on a smooth board

The fact thet he said cofee😂😂

ahhh the rare Coffee gambit hahaha

And he was speaking in English, lol

His English is also quite good here.Usually Russians have a very thick English accent

@@jamesmarshall4364 Yeah he's so natural at speaking English in a time when it wasn't common ,even Carlsen's English isn't that good as Kasparov.

@pianist1408 lol, i know fish trap, but Kasparov literally stayed nr 1 for decades... Nakamura hasnt even reach number one, further Kasparov literally was battling chess and fighting everything, the other guy is a narcissist that used is overconfidence to make is opponents insecure and used his cheater aura and cheating scandals to get a edge vs his opponents. Once he got discovered his wins suddenly disappeared...

@@pianist-yx6ot niemann?🤣🤣this better be a troll comment

Lol 🤣

Jason Jewell agreed lol

Jason Jewell so true lmao

SAAAAAAME ;-;

Was just about to say the sane thing . Lol

@@edmondt848 Thats all good but you wont ever be Fishers level just by doing those things. After a certain time you will hit the ceilling after which your rating wont ever increase. Fisher had a deep understanding of chess and he was able was able to find best moves even in abosolutely new positions you would never be able to do that just by doing the things you said.

I laughed all knight to that lol

+Robertushka Tea That was a really bad pawn.

+JJJMMM1 A rookie pun, you need to check yourself mate :D (click)

+CDATA Most excellent! Have a like good sir or ma'am.

Raymond Dudley I'm a guy and thx, glad you weren't board. haha

True. I think their score against eachother is Kasparov 27-21 Karpov with like 130 draws or something :D That's a very close matchup

Karwan Nouri I think its 21-19,with 100 draws,I can be wrong tho

Definitely one of the greatest rivalry of all time. Their rivalry is reminds us of Capablanca against Alekhine. Whose scores were also very close. According to chessgames.com.. Capablanca beat Alekhine 9 to 7, with 33 draws.. very close

And Kasparov is much younger than Karpov.

He did see the lines, only it was too late

Amazing story, cheers for sharing it

Yeah that's a cool anecdote.

Yasser's always that cool dude, he made the chess atmosphere a little lighter

@@nza1804 Thanks to you, but my best advice is to read "Chess duels", one of the best chess books ever written. Very, very entertaining anecdotes and stories of the enconunters between Seirawan and the world champions (Smyslov, Tahl, Petrosian, Spassky, Fischer, Kárpov and Kaspárov).

@@corkystorky Yeah, he is a wonderful commentator, but his relationship with Gari has improved a lot since both retired from professional chess

Paul Doyle It shows amazing memory

*It’s Rewind Time*

i'd call that "trolling smile",; but whatevar!

He smiled because he realized the guy had no clue what was going on.

Also that he had a problem by not washing his teeth

@@aitorjara100 Who cares?

@@Elixir6 Not you or him, that's for sure

Yeah but today's markets are based on easy information 24/7, executives use statistics combined with their databases, memory is not a problem because information is stored today in a greater level and it's easily accessed. Big data also is very important in the decision making process. About Kasparov, he is the GOAT, in my opinion.

makes sense. xDD

🤣🤣

+Alex Bonesteel A dead bishop is the best bishop.

+ChaoYun yeah and that's make you a good person by saying that...

+Alex Bonesteel Reminds me of Jose Mourinho

The only important piece is a King. The others are a means to the W

"So what?" If he kills _that_ particular bishop, then at least five choirboys won't be molested.* [*] Although one bishop is fully capable of molesting thousands of choirboys in just one year, I'd used the cardinal number "five" to avoid scaring children. Another reason was because Father McKenzie, for instance, was only proven to _molest_ seven choirboys in his lifetime; after that, he began brutally raping them instead.

I have 2200 on lichess, and it's still incredibly difficult to find all these options, despite the fact that tactics are my strong point. I think you overestimate people.

@@user-ct1cx5gj9u 2200 lichess is 1400 otb lmao

@@rawrxd4919 2200 rapid lichess is about 2000 FIDE.

@@user-ct1cx5gj9u no it fucking isnt lmao

@@rawrxd4919 Do you have any arguments or something? Where did you get 1400? Or you can only shit with words.

Oh man, u made my day

Is this for the voice or for the face ?

B GDouff face

B GDouff Voico to

I heff nussing to say

Steven Yourke indeed. Think we'd seen a very much lower frequency of draws than what is common nowadays.

Don't u think Karpov is strong too? We don't know if Fischer can defense the title against Karpov

@@tuankietnguyen1252 Fisher’s Elo rating was significantly higher than was Karpov’s. Fischer, 2780, Karpov, 2705.

@@tuankietnguyen1252 Of course it is not said that Fischer would have beaten Karpov. But I think S Y is referring to the interesting clash of (similar?) styles a match between Fischer and Kasparov would have given.

fischer would be old and kasparov will be in his prime

That's why he didn't calculate them. He was able to intuit that he had an overwhelming force without having to actually calculate it. By now computers are far better than humans at chess because they can calculate so much deeper and with perfect accuracy, but humans are still a lot better than computers at doing exactly what Kasparov did in this game: Intuitively recognizing advantageous patterns.

lol

How can you play e5 at the first move? sorry for my english

+Carlos Alberto Well, you can play e5 first move if you're black

+arsenalfanrichi But normally whites play first

+arsenalfanrichi Well is possible play with black first but...

Ludi DaVinci LOL... :D

can someone explain why is that not a stalemate?

nevermind i see it

Wonderful.

Lol stupid

No really

I don't even know those ones. Here they are called The Lunatic and The Horse Then you have The Tower, and instead of Queen, it is literally called "The B*tch" xD

lol where is that?

I know inly one. Check mate

+Guillaume Huet Chess rating goes up to low 3000's

No. 1

Красава))

Fun fact, you get that Elo from surrendering at your first game, so just play Kasparov and do that :D

Elo, not ELO. It's a surname, not an acronym.

An ultimate nerd

10.000 would be autistic.

@@sebaba001 Dude.. try one. Just try to play a full game and memorise all the moves. Remembering over 50 is autistic level.

@@GreyZonex Not if you study it and its your life. Concert classical pianists can play a 45 min symphony and longer from memory. You would be surprised what your mind can hold. Think of how many songs you can sing along with. Ill bet its in the 100s. Word for word and hear the melody and guitar and bass.

@@Yngsatchvai music is a language, its different

@@sfgox10 Chess is a language too. It all makes a lot of sense when it's connected. It's not just "he can memorize it". No. He UNDERSTANDS IT, and use it in his advantage.

Tennis fan

agreeded

both champions!

quantity PLUS quality (think about 2x Knights vs 1x Queen).

skyrim no wait for your business

actually the score between them is really close,i think 2 point difference,so their competitive strength was about equal..Karpov was really good at countering your strategies,thats why Kasparov tried to win by tactics and complications,otherwise it would be like 98 draws 1 win and 1 loss

You seem to be forgetting that Karpov became World Champion by default. Fischer would have whooped his ass if his requirements had been met.

Karpov after he got the title when crazy on tourney he had a record or still have winning most tourney in the history of chess just to proof he earned that tile. Karpov was great chess champion. @@sadboitimes9012

@@sadboitimes9012 Fischer refused to play; that's a loss in my book

+irelandbloke That's not chess. ..haha

ireland,you can beat Kasparov but not Karpov...

..... anyone COULD, no one CAN

Chutes and Ladders?

LeftMeNot same game, different names

nah mann u wrong afffg

@@thunder9793 about what?

@@Count.Dracula46 about not including neither fisher, magnus, morphy, nor lasker in the list these are the true greatest players of thier times they were unmatcheble in their primes, lasker was a champ for 27 years, morphy probably had the greatest gap between him and other players of his time, fisher litteraly managed to defeat one of the biggest countries in history, tens of USSR 's best players were helping boris to prepare while fisher only had himself and his trainer, and lastly magnus carlsen currently demonstrates the level of chess understanding that has never been seen before, he is without a doubt the best player that ever existed, he is the true mozart of chess, especially the endgames, the are super accurate and Carlsen doesn't blunder, maybe alekhine and capablanca were geniuses but the guys I listed were much better. (P. S. I agree about Kasparov, he is also one of the goats)

@@thunder9793 Fischer was amazing too, and I love his playstyle a lot. About Carlsen, he had and has the chess engines and database of millions of games and openings available to him. Capablanca had engine level accuracy a whole century before. As much as I love and respect Morphy and Dr Lasker, nothing comes even close to the beauty of Alekhine's chess. And btw, Malik Mir Sultan Khan was hands down the most amazing and genius chess player of recorded history.

@@Count.Dracula46 Don't underestimate Carlsen just for him havimg engines, engines can't help in the endgame or in the late middlegame, they do help you with openings and also show you your mistakes but blaming magnus's success solely on engines and databases is wrong cause every other player today also has it but magnus still manages to dominate and had 5 world titles which is a very serious feat, also I agree that alekhine was a great tactician but mikhail tal's games are much more beautiful and interesting to watch and can youbplease explaine by which logic you put malik sultan khan above all the players that i have listed

I think Petrosian was the best of all time

+elijah shypitsyn his sharpness of mind is underestimated by many because of his draw before loss attitude but when the big games were on the line he brought out one of the best attackers to play the game

+elijah shypitsyn draw before win* is what I meant he didn't go for the throat till his opponent messed up for the most part

I have a problem with your statement . Computers have changed the history of chess ,as means of transport did . Bobby Fischer ,for me ,is still the best ,because he became the WC all by himself ,without our actual technology .

to me..Kasparov played a lot of moves that , by being taught by the book, would have lost the game. However, he 'knew' it should work and it more than less did. It was just a master at work. I still think RJF would beat him in a match, though. Just because of RJF masterful knowledge of theory.

David Nantz *hold my beer*

David Nantz 😄😄😄😄😄

I was searching for someone who noticed!

Haha

İ am laughing with same way

The other way around actually.

First he'll mate your king, then he'll mate your queen.

@hagard hagards whoa chill out Einstein

@Czterdziestysiódmy okay Gaylord

For the same reason you would watch an orchestra even tho you don't play any instrument :)

He's a GM

Azeroth Gthotel GM = Grand Master in chess, game master is for games like MMOs

Azeroth Gthotel lol, so you call me idiot because you made a terrible and unfunny joke and I couldn't see it? okay...

Azeroth Gthotel I don't know of anyone that has called someone an idiot and meant "facepalm" lol, when I call someone an idiot I mean idiot. But if you say so.

Mike Porter Which guy of them? I don't know who won! :(

Hey that's cheating. If he didn't have the queen he couldn't have blundered it

At the start, the rook and queen are hardly used